Abstract
Betting markets have drawn much attention in the economics, finance and operational research literature because they provide a valuable window on the manner in which individuals use information in wider financial markets. One question that has received particular attention is to what extent individuals discount information in market prices. The predominant approach to explore this issue involves predictive modeling to forecast market outcomes and examining empirically whether abnormal returns can be made by employing these forecasts. It is argued here that present practices to assess such forecasting models, including the use of point estimates and information, which would not be available in practice (at the forecasting stage) and failing to update forecasting models with information from the recent past, may give rise to misleading conclusions regarding a market's informational efficiency. Hypotheses are developed to conceptualize these views and are tested by means of extensive empirical experimentation using real-world data from the Hong Kong horserace betting market. Our study identifies several sources of bias and confirms that current practices may not be relied upon. A more appropriate modeling procedure for assessing the true degree of market efficiency is then proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Measuring the true degree of market efficiency requires that practical considerations for exploiting information are considered. Consequently, a day-wise rather than a race-wise jackknife is employed because the latter would imply that individual forecasting models could be built for each race. This is practically impossible given that informative odds, which form an important part of these models, are only available at most 5 min before the start of a race.
Equivalent to the homogeneity of variance assumption in ordinary (ie, between-subjects) ANOVA.
This follows from the fact that the results observed for a training-set size of 100 racing days (ie, ∼700 races) does not differ significantly from those observed for any larger setting.
References
Asch P and Quandt RE (1987). Efficiency and profitability in exotic bets. Economica 59 (215): 289–298.
Benter W (1994). Computer based horse race handicapping and wagering systems: A report. In: Hausch DB, Lo VSY and Ziemba WT (eds). Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets. Academic Press: New York, pp 183–198.
Bolton RN and Chapman RG (1986). Searching for positive returns at the track: A multinomial logit model for handicapping horse races. Mngt Sci 32 : 1040–1060.
Breiman L (1961). Optimal gambling systems for favourable games. In: Neyman J (ed). Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University California Press: Berkeley, pp 63–68.
Brown KH and Abraham FJ (2002). Testing market efficiency in the major league baseball over-under betting market. J Sport Econ 3 : 311–319.
Buraimo B, Forrest D and Simmons R (2009). Insights for clubs from modelling match attendance in football. J Opl Res Soc 60 : 147–155.
Chapman RG (1994). Still searching for positive returns at the track: Empirical results from 2000 Hong Kong races. In: Hausch DB, Lo VSY and Ziemba WT (eds). Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets. Academic Press: New York, pp 173–181.
Clarke SR and Allsopp P (2001). Fair measures of performance: The World Cup of cricket. J Opl Res Soc 52 : 471–479.
Crafts NFR (1985). Some evidence of insider knowledge in horse race betting in Britain. Economica 52 (207): 295–304.
Dawson P, Morley B, Paton D and Thomas D (2008). To bat or not to bat: An examination of match outcomes in day-night limited overs cricket. J Opl Res Soc 60 : 1786–1793.
Deschamps B and Gergaud O (2007). Efficiency in betting markets: Evidence from English football. J Pred Markets 1 (1): 61–73.
Dixon MJ and Coles SG (1997). Modelling association football scores and inefficiencies in the football betting market. Appl Stat 46 : 265–280.
Dixon MJ and Pope P (2004). The value of statistical forecasts in the UK association football betting market. Int J Forecasting 20 : 697–711.
Dowie J (1976). On the efficiency and equity of betting markets. Economica 43 (17): 139–150.
Dyte D and Clarke SR (2000). A ratings based Poisson model for World Cup soccer simulation. J Opl Res Soc 51 : 993–998.
Edelman D (2007). Adapting support vector machine methods for horserace odds prediction. Ann Opns Res 151 : 325–336.
Figlewski S (1979). Subjective information and market efficiency in a betting market. J Polit Econ 87 (1): 75–89.
Forrest D and Simmons R (2000). Forecasting sport: The behaviour and performance of football tipsters. Int J Forecasting 16 : 317–331.
Forrest D and Simmons R (2002). Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: The case of English soccer. J Roy Stat Soc D-Sta 51 : 229–241.
Forrest D and Simmons R (2008). Sentiment in the betting market on Spanish football. Appl Econ 40 (1): 119–126.
Forrest D, Goddard J and Simmons R (2005). Odds-setters as forecasters: The case of English football. Int J Forecasting 21 : 551–564.
Goddard J and Asimakopoulos I (2004). Forecasting football results and the efficiency of fixed-odds betting. J Forecasting 23 (1): 51–66.
Greenhough J, Birch PC, Chapman SC and Rowlands G (2002). Football goal distributions and extremal statistics. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 316 : 615–624.
Gu MG, Huang C and Benter W (2003). Multinomial probit models for competitive horse racing. Working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Hastie T, Tibshirani R and Friedman J (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2nd edn, Springer: New York.
Hausch DB and Ziemba WT (1985). Transactions costs, market inefficiencies and entries in a racetrack betting model. Mngt Sci 31 : 381–394.
Hirotsu N and Wright M (2002). Using a Markov process model of an association football match to determine the optimal timing of substitution and tactical decisions. J Opl Res Soc 53 : 88–96.
Hong Y and Chiu C (1988). Sex, locus of control, and illusion of control in Hong Kong as correlates of gambling involvement. J Soc Psychol 128 : 667–673.
Hope C (2003). When should you sack a football manager? Results from a simple model applied to the English Premiership. J Opl Res Soc 54 : 1167–1176.
Johnson JEV and Bruce AC (2001). Calibration of subjective probability judgements in a naturalistic setting. J Organ Behav Hum Dec 85 : 265–290.
Johnson JEV, Jones O and Tang L (2006). Exploring decision makers’ use of price information in a speculative market. Mngt Sci 52 : 897–908.
Kelly JL (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Tech J 35: 917–926.
Law D and Peel DA (2002). Insider trading, herding behaviour and market plungers in the British horse-race betting market. Economica 69 (274): 327–338.
Leong SM and Lim KG (1994). Cross-track betting: Is the grass greener on the other side? In: Hausch DB, Lo VSY and Ziemba WT (eds). Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets. Academic Press: New York, pp 617–629.
Lessmann S, Sung M-C and Johnson JEV (2009). Identifying winners of competitive events: A SVM-based classification model for horserace prediction. Eur J Opl Res 196 : 569–577.
Lessmann S, Sung M-C and Johnson JEV (2010). Alternative methods of predicting competitive events: An application in horserace betting markets. Int J Forecasting 26 : 518–536.
Levitt SD (2004). Why are gambling markets organised so differently from financial markets? Econ J 114 (495): 223–246.
Maddala GS (1983). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press: New York.
McFadden D (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed). Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press: New York, pp 105–142.
McGlothlin WH (1956). Stability of choices among uncertain alternatives. Am J Psychol 69 : 604–615.
McHale I and Forrest D (2005). The importance of recent scores in a forecasting model for professional golf tournaments. IMA J Mngt Math 16 : 131–140.
Paton D and Vaughan Williams L (2005). Forecasting outcomes in spread betting markets: Can bettors use ‘quarbs’ to beat the book? J Forecasting 24 : 139–154.
Paul R and Weinbach A (2005). Market efficiency and NCAA college basketball gambling. J Econ Financ 29 : 403–408.
Percy DF (2009). A mathematical analysis of badminton scoring systems. J Opl Res Soc 60 : 63–71.
Perlich C, Provost F, Simonoff JS and Cohen WW (2003). Tree induction vs. logistic regression: A learning-curve analysis. J Mach Learn Res 4 : 211–255.
Pope PF and Peel DA (1988). Information, prices and efficiency in a fixed-odds betting market. Economica 56 (223): 323–341.
Russell RA and Leung JMY (1994). Devising a cost effective schedule for a baseball league. Opns Res 42 : 614–625.
Sauer RD (1998). The economics of wagering markets. J Econ Lit 36 : 2021–2064.
Schnytzer A and Shilony Y (1995). Inside information in a betting market. Econ J 105 : 963–971.
Shin HS (1992). Prices of state contingent claims with insider traders, and the favourite-longshot bias. Econ J 102 : 426–435.
Snyder WW (1978). Horse racing: Testing the efficient markets model. J Financ 33 : 1109–1118.
Sung M-C and Johnson JEV (2010). Revealing weak form inefficiency in a market for state contingent claims: The importance of market ecology, modelling procedures and investment strategies. Economica 77 (305): 128–147.
Suzuki AK, Salasar LEB, Leite JG and Louzada-Neto F (2009). A Bayesian approach for predicting match outcomes: The 2006 (Association) Football World Cup. J Opl Res Soc 61 : 1530–1539.
Tena JD and Forrest D (2007). Within-season dismissal of football coaches: Statistical analysis of causes and consequences. Eur J Opl Res 181 : 362–373.
Thaler RH and Ziemba WT (1988). Anomalies: Parimutuel betting markets: Racetracks and lotteries. J Econ Perspect 2 : 161–174.
Van Zijl T (1984). Returns and weak form efficiency: Betting markets. Working paper, Victoria University of Wellington.
Vaughan Williams L and Paton D (1997). Why is there a favourite-longshot bias in British racetrack betting markets? Econ J 107 : 150–158.
Vlastakis N, Dotsis G and Markellos RN (2008). Nonlinear modelling of European football scores using support vector machines. Appl Econ 40 (1): 111–118.
White EM, Dattero R and Flores B (1992). Combining vector forecasts to predict thoroughbred horse race outcomes. Int J Forecasting 8 : 595–611.
Woodland LM and Woodland BM (1994). Market efficiency and the favourite-longshot bias: The baseball betting market. J Financ XLIX (1): 269–279.
Wright MB (2006). Scheduling fixtures for Basketball New Zealand. Comput Opns Res 33 : 1875–1893.
Zar JH (2007). Biostatistical Analysis. 5th edn, Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
Data characteristics and independent variables
The data set employed in the study embraces 4276 races with 55 690 runners. The data set incorporates a rich set of different types of horseraces, varying in, for example, distance, race class, track conditions and surface, as well as time of race (ie, day or night) or race type (ie, handicap versus non-handicap). Table A1 summarizes the distribution of races across these factors as well as their evolution over time.
In order to construct CL forecasting models, a set of 40 fundamental variables has been employed, which are designed to capture each runner's winning potential. Whereas the precise nature of the variables is not important here (since our aim is to demonstrate that different methodologies associated with model training and testing, and associated wagering strategies, have a significant effect on the degree of efficiency identified in a market), a brief summary of their definition is given in Table A2. In addition to these fundamental variables, all forecasting models also incorporate runners’ market odds.
Appendix B
Detailed results of the learning curve analysis
See Table B1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lessmann, S., Sung, MC. & Johnson, J. Towards a methodology for measuring the true degree of efficiency in a speculative market. J Oper Res Soc 62, 2120–2132 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.192
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.192