Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing workforce turnover in Asian factories using a mixed-mode modelling approach

  • Case-oriented Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

While many studies have been conducted into labour productivity in Western countries, similar analysis is just beginning in their Asian counterparts. In this paper, the problem of workforce turnover is examined in the context of three case study companies (two Chinese and one Singaporean), all being outsource suppliers of manufactured products with relatively similar cultural and environmental influences. The cost of turnover is examined through a simple costing model that includes the indirect effects of lower-output rate and increased scrap because of worker inexperience, as well as the well-recognised direct costs. In addition, the model used extends the costing analysis by recognising the multiplier impact on the value-added lost by this inexperience. Having established the significance of the cost of workforce turnover on the performance of the companies studied, company data were utilised to undertake an analysis of the causes of the turnover to be undertaken, bearing in mind the existing findings reported in Western case studies. While the core reasons for the workforce turnover in the factories studied are consistent with findings elsewhere in the world, the weightings of individual contributing factors vary. This understanding provides the foundations for the development of proactive programs to reduce the incidence of labour turnover in the Asian context, thereby leading to considerable cost savings and other competitive benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham S (2007). Employee retention requires a plan . Construction Bulletin pp 106–108.

  • Aminpour S and Woetzel JR (2006). Applying lean manufacturing in China. McKinsey Quarterly, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Applying_lean_manufacturing_in_China_1792, accessed 16 June 2006.

  • Barsh J Capozzi MM and Davidson J (2008). Leadership and innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Leadership_and_innovation_2089, accessed 25 January 2008, pp 2–9.

  • Bassi LJ and Van Buren ME (1997). Sustaining high performance in bad times . Training Dev 51: 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchfield R (2007). Keeping in sync. Management, New Zealand Institute of Management, http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=36&did=1391983931&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1254796383&clientId=16532, accessed 20 January 2008, pp 28–29.

  • Borton G (2007). Managing productivity: Measuring the business impact of employee proficiency and the employee job life cycle . Mngt Serv Autumn: 28–33.

  • Charkiewicz T (2004). Efficiency is key to competing globally . Manuf Eng 132: 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A and Brown A (1998). HRM strategies and labour turnover in the hotel industry: A comparative study of Australia and Singapore . Int J Hum Resour Mngt 9: 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles M, Lanfranchi J, Skalli A and Treble J (2007). Pay, technology, and the cost of worker absence . Econ Enquiry 45: 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Computer Weekly (2001). Employers learn to look after their staff, May, 24: p 94.

  • Conlin M (2007). Shirking working: the war on hooky. Business Week, 11 December, Issue 4058, pp 72–75.

  • Dauch RE (2006). Preparing tomorrow's manufacturing workforce . Manuf Eng 136: 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorgan SJ Dowdy JJ Rippin TM (2006). The link between management and productivity. McKinsey Quarterly, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_link_between_management_and_productivity_1725, accessed 13 September 2006.

  • Drickhamer D (2004). Manufacturers like us . Ind Week November: 35–42.

  • Finlay S (2007). High employee turnovers hurt: The revolving door at dealerships goes round and round . Ward's Dealer Business November: 34.

  • Harmon J, Scotti D, Behson S, Farias G, Petzel R, Neuman J and Keashly L (2003). Effects of high-involvement work systems on employee satisfaction and service costs in veterans healthcare . J Healthc Mngt 48: 293–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg F (1966). Work and the Nature of Man . Cleveland, OH: Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexter JR (2006). Better manufacturing in China: An interview with two of PLP's top executives. McKinsey Quarterly, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Better_manufacturing_in_China_An_interview_with_two_of_PLPs_top_executives_1865, accessed 13 November 2006.

  • HR Focus (2006a). The present and future job market: Top trends and how to prepare. 83: 8.

  • HR Focus (2006b). How do your turnover rates compare?. August: 10–13.

  • Institute of Management and Adminstration (2005). Surveys reveal turnover rates are on the rise. Report on Salary Surveys May: 11–14.

  • Karamally L (2004). Overlooked keys to productivity . Workforce Mngt 83: 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketler P (2008). Chinese employers fight retention battle . Train Dev J January: 16–17.

  • Kindler NB Krishnakanthan V and Tinaikar R (2007). Applying lean to application development and maintenance. McKinsey Quarterly, http://mckinseyquarterly.com/Applying_lean_to_application_development_and_maintenance_1979, accessed 30 May 2007.

  • Kling J (1995). High performance work systems and firm performance . Mon Labor Rev May: 29–36.

  • Lehaney B and Clarke S (1997). Soft systems methodology (and simulation) for mixed-mode modelling . In: O'Brien F and Orman A (eds). Operations Research Keynote Papers 1997. Operational Research Society: Birmingham, pp. 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell CR (2007). Analysis and control of employee turnover . The Heath Care Manager 26: 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1943). A theory of human motivation . Psych Rev 50: 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Manpower, Manpower Research and Statistics Department (2005). Labour Market, First Quarter 2005, Singapore, June,http://www.mom.gov.sg/publish/momportal/en/press_room/press_releases/2005/20050615-LabourMarketFirstQuarter2005Report.html, accessed 26 October 2007.

  • Morrell K and Arnold J (2007). Look after they leap: Illustrating the value of retrospective reports in employee turnover . Int J Hum Resour Mngt 18: 1683–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls MG and Cargill BJ (2001). The use of mixed mode modelling in determining best practice for a business. In: Nicholls MG, Clarke S and Lehaney B (eds). Mixed-model Modelling: Mixing Methodologies for Organisational Intervention Applied Optimisation, Vol. 58. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht; Boston; London, pp. 259–292.

  • O'Connell M and Mei-Chuan K (2007). The cost of employee turnover . Ind Mngt January/February: 14–19.

  • Porter ME (1980). Competitive Strategy—Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors . The Free Press, Simon and Schuster: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queripel T (1987). Hotel management grapples with high turnover . Train Dev J April: 14–15.

  • Rubin DK, Powers MB, Illia T, Krizan WG and Korman R (2006). Drain on the bottom line . Eng News-Rec 256: 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm T, Levine D, Concordia M, Martyn P, Hughes R, Jacobs J and Begg D (2006). Changing the game in strategic sourcing at Procter & Gamble: Expressive competition enabled by optimization . Interfaces 36: 55–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherkenbach WW (1991). Deming's Road to Continual Improvement . SPC Press Inc: Knoxville, Tennessee, USA pp 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil S (2008). The factory of factories . Newsweek International January 21, dfp 151.

  • Trailer-Body Builders Newsletter (2007). Employee retention: Investing in your employees may boost your bottom line. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=12&did=1322634671&SrchMode=3&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1254795149&clientId=16532&aid=1, accessed 25 September 2007, pp 317–318.

  • Wilson DD and Collier DD (2000). An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Causal Model . Decision Sci 31: 361–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman P (2005). Asia Wall Street Journal, 12th April.

  • Withiam G (2007). Study examines unexpected costs of turnover . Hotel and Motel Management 222: 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Based on an earlier paper delivered at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute, Hawaii, USA, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eady, J., Nicholls, M. Reducing workforce turnover in Asian factories using a mixed-mode modelling approach. J Oper Res Soc 62, 651–661 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.17

Keywords

Navigation