Skip to main content
Log in

Halfway to Infinity: Systems Theorizing for the Practitioners?

  • Special Conference Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Systems theory is seen as stressing the rational mind (what we think about) to the detriment of the transactional mind (which we use day-to-day). This stress can be harmful to practitioners who must work in practical, transactional worlds. Rather than attempting to be infinitely rational, we propose a position halfway to infinity-rational and transactional combined.

Much of systems theory is pleasing to hear and difficult to contradict. Much of the theory is about design of systems, but it is in the often non-rational process of implementation that the real system emerges. Also the theory tells us about systems but not how to identify the `correct' system that our O.R. efforts are impacting. The theory also tells about complexity, but the tools presented for handling it do not seem related to the theory.

The halfway position is to build a body of contingent theory from reflection on experience, using systems theory as a framework for thinking rather than a guide for action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eden, C., Graham, R. Halfway to Infinity: Systems Theorizing for the Practitioners?. J Oper Res Soc 34, 723–728 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1983.166

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1983.166

Keywords

Navigation