Skip to main content
Log in

Planning Under Uncertainty: 1. The Inflexibility of Methodologies

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The inflexibility of plans and planning has been much criticised. While there are certain material factors in the structures of developed societies which promote such inflexibility, the criticism, if substantiated, clearly represents a major failing of planning methodology. In this paper the two most prominent planning methodologies—rational comprehensive and incrementalist—are reviewed, and found to incorporate inflexibility in distinctive ways into their procedures. Other approaches to planning which stress the importance of flexibility and attempt to make it operational are then critically surveyed; from these certain desirable characteristics of a methodology for flexible planning are distilled. Finally, the urgency of the problem is illustrated with examples both from theorists of planning and from the practice of planning in a wide range of application areas. (An alternative methodology is proposed in a companion paper.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenhead, J. Planning Under Uncertainty: 1. The Inflexibility of Methodologies. J Oper Res Soc 31, 209–216 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1980.38

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1980.38

Navigation