Skip to main content
Log in

‘Human nature’, science and international political theory

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Post-War rise in importance of the individual in international political theory, as evidenced by the development of the international human rights regime, International Criminal Law and theories of global justice, has, paradoxically, been accompanied by an highly critical approach to the concept of human nature. Criticisms of human nature largely rest on the association of the concept of with social Darwinism, racism, sexism and eugenics, but, understood properly and at the right level of generality, the concept of human nature need not attract such undesirable, pseudo-scientific bedfellows. The modern science of evolutionary psychology is in the process of changing our understanding of the social implications of our genetic inheritance, and social and political theorists ought not to resist this change, and international relations scholars should not leave the field to realist scholars. Premature generalisations based on the findings of evolutionary psychology should certainly be resisted, but so should blanket rejections of the new knowledge. The task for international political theorists is to find a way of integrating the findings of the new human sciences into a humane understanding of the human animal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The suggestion that the UP are necessarily heterosexual is unfortunate — had Brown been writing 20 years later, I suspect he would have referred to winning the attention of sexual partners.

References

  • Akerlof, George and Robert Schiller (2009) Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why it Matters for Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, John, ed. (1994) Male Violence, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardrey, Robert (1966) The Territorial Imperative, New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnhart, Larry (1998) Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert and Robert O. Keohane (1985) ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics 38 (1): 226–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, Jerome H., Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, eds (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Duncan (2006) ‘Beware of False Prophets: Biology, Human Nature and the Future of International Relations Theory’, International Affairs 82 (3): 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, Ken (2005) Natural Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, Ken (2009) ‘Fairness as a Natural Phenomenon’, http://else.econ.ucl.ac.uk/papers/uploaded/332.pdf (accessed 1 June, 2012).

  • Boas, Frank (1982) Race, Language and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Douglas (1991) Human Universals, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G.A. (2001) Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, William E. (2002) Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, Leda and John Tooby (1992) ‘Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange’, in Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby, eds, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, 163–228, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1998) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. in Paul Ekman, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard (1976) The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel (2004) Freedom Evolves, Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R.I.M. and Barrett Louise, eds (2007) Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method, New York: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Dennis (1983) Margaret Mead and Samoa, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Dennis (1999) The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert (2006) ‘Behavioural Ethics Meets Natural Justice’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert (2009) Game Theory Evolving, 2nd edn., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Steven Jay (1981) The Mismeasure of Man, New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Mike (2008) Social Darwinism in European and North American Thought, 1860–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herodotus (2008) The Histories, The Landmark Herodotus. Andrea L. Purvis, trans. London: Quercus.

  • Holder, Cindy and David Reidy, eds (2013) Human Rights: The Hard Questions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Dominic D.P. (2004) Overconfidence in War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Dominic D.P. et al. (2006) ‘Overconfidence in Wargames: Experimental Evidence on Expectations, Aggression, Gender and Testosterone’, Proceeding of the Royal Society B 273 (2006): 2513–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L.H. (1996) War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven (2003) Liberals and Cannibals: The Implications of Diversity, London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catherine A. (2007) Are Women Human? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, Ian (2005) Saturday, London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, Ian (2006) ‘Literature, Science and Human Nature’, in Robin Headlam Wells and Johnjoe McFadden, eds, Human Nature: Fact and Fiction, 40–60, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, Ian (2010) Solar, London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl (1992) Early Writings, in Lucio Colletti, ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Margaret (1928) Coming of Age in Samoa, New York: Blue Ribbon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgely, Mary (1991) Can’t We Make Moral Judgements? Bristol: Bristol Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Desmond (1967) The Naked Ape, London: Corgi Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha (2000) Women and Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagden, Anthony (2008) Worlds at War: The 2,500 Year Struggle Between East and West, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven (2002) The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971/1999) A Theory of Justice, 1st and 2nd revised edns., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Matt (2004) Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes us Human, New York: HarperPerennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1981) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Steven, Leon J. Kamin and Richard C. Lewontin (1984) Not in Out Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Stephen Peter (2005) War and Human Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagarin, Raphael D. and Terence Taylor, eds (2008) Natural Security: A Darwinian Approach to a Dangerous World. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrale, Ullica (2000) Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall (1977) The Use and Abuse of Biology, Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall (2008) The Western Illusion of Human Nature, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seville Statement on Violence (1990) American Psychologist 45 (10): 1167–68.

  • Singer, Peter (1999) A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution and Co-operation, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, Gordy (2007) ‘I Feel Your Pain: New Proof of “Mirror Neurons” Explains Why We Experience the Grief and Joy of Others, and Maybe Why Humans are Altruistic. But Don’t Call us Gandhi Yet’, Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/11/05/mirror_neurons/ (accessed 5 November, 2007).

  • Spencer, Herbert (1992) The Man Versus the State and Other Essays, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, Bradley (2004) Darwin and International Relations; On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, Tsvetan (1987) The Conquest of America, New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Patrick and Laura Chrisman, eds (1993) Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter (1970) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, New edn., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, Theodore (1999) An Intimate History of Humanity, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A much earlier version of some of the ideas presented in this essay appears in ‘Human Rights and Human Nature’ in Holder and Reidy (2013). This essay was originally presented as the Keynote Address at the 9th Central and East European International Studies Association Convention, Krakow, Poland, 20 September 2012. I have had the advantage of very helpful criticisms from three readers, but in the interests of stimulating debate, I have left the body of the argument unchanged, making only marginal clarifications and corrections; more than is usually the case, all errors are indeed my responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, C. ‘Human nature’, science and international political theory. J Int Relat Dev 16, 435–454 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.17

Keywords

Navigation