Abstract
Scholars increasingly emphasize the impact of institutions on multinational enterprises (MNEs), but the opposite relationship has attracted less research – that is, MNE agency in relation to institutions. Based on a comparative case study of six MNEs from the United States and Sweden, this paper remedies this. It explores and explicates MNE subunits’ strategic responses to host country institutional constraints and opportunities in five different regions. A new-institutional approach is adopted, which allows for an investigation of MNE subunit agency in relation to normative and cognitive institutions, as well as regulative ones. This fine-grained analysis reveals not only what kinds of responses MNE subunits invoke, but why and how they are able to respond. We identify four strategic responses by which subunits shape, transpose and evade institutions in the pursuit of competitive advantage: Innovation, Arbitrage, Circumvention and Adaptation. These responses are driven by three key enablers: multinationality, foreignness and institutional ambiguity – that serve to enhance and heighten three mechanisms: reflexivity, role expectations and resources. By linking the enablers and the mechanisms to specific types of strategic responses in a framework and typology, the paper not only contributes to emerging research on the interplay between MNEs, institutions and strategy, but to strategy practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adcock, R., & Collier, D. 2001. Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. The American Political Science Review, 95 (3): 529–546.
Almeida, P., & Phene, A. 2004. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (8–9): 847–864.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (11): 979–996.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (5): 802–818.
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. 1997. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18 (1): 93–117.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99–120.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. 2009. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization, 31–58. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3 (1): 65–107.
Beckert, J. 1999. Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20 (5): 777–799.
Behrman, J. N., & Grosse, R. E. 1990. International business and governments: Issues and institutions. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Binder, A. 2007. For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36 (6): 547–571.
Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (3): 207–229.
Birkinshaw, J., & Morrison, A. J. 1996. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (4): 729–794.
Birkinshaw, J., Brannen, M. Y., & Tung, R. L. 2011. Introduction to the Special Issue: From a distance and generalizable to up-close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (5): 573–581.
Boubakri, N., Mansi, S. A., & Saffar, W. 2013. Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate risk-taking. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (3): 195–215.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brockman, P., Rui, O. M., & Zou, H. 2013. Institutions and the performance of politically connected M&As. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (8): 833–852.
Bromiley, P., & Papenhausen, C. 2003. Assumptions of rationality and equilibrium in strategy research: The limits of traditional economic analysis. Strategic Organization, 1 (4): 413–438.
Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 203–221.
Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. 2000. Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (1): 89–97.
Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London, UK: Macmillan Press.
Cantwell, J., & Brannen, M. Y. 2011. Positioning JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (1): 1–9.
Cantwell, J., Dunning, J., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4): 567–586.
Chacar, A. S., Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. 2010. Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (7): 1119–1140.
Chan, C., & Makino, S. 2007. Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 621–638.
Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. 2005. The impact of institutional reforms on characteristics and survival of foreign subsidiaries in emerging economies. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 35–62.
Clark, E., & Geppert, M. 2011. Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: A political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (2): 395–416.
Coeurderoy, R. G., & Gordon, M. 2008. Regulatory environments and the location decision: Evidence from the early foreign market entries of new-technology-based firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 670–687.
Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. 1993. Conceptual “stretching” revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87 (4): 845–855.
Creed, W. E. D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. 2010. Being the change: Resolving institutional contradition through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6): 1336–1364.
D’Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. H. 1991. Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3): 636–661.
Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., & Francis, J. D. 2000. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2): 239–258.
de Vaus, D. A. 2001. Research design in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, 3–21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.
Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. 2003. Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. 2002. Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55 (7): 553–560.
Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. 2004. Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In M. A. Hitt, & J. L. C. Cheng (Eds), Advances in international management: The evolving theory of the multinational firm. Vol. 16 Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Edman, J. 2009. The paradox of foreignness: Norm-breaking MNEs in the Japanese banking industry. PhD Dissertation, Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103 (4): 962–1023.
Ferner, A., Almond, P., & Colling, T. 2005. Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: The case of ‘workforce diversity’ in US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 304–321.
Fernö. 1994. Conversation with Ove Fernö. Addiction, 89 (10): 1215–1226.
Fligstein, N. 1997. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (4): 397–405.
Gerring, J. 2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? The American Political Science Review, 98 (2): 341–354.
Ghoshal, S. 1988. Environmental scanning in Korean firms: Organizational isomorphism in action. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1): 65–86.
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4): 603–626.
Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (4): 323–337.
Giddens, A. 1976. New rules of sociological method. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Gooderham, P., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. 1998. When in Rome, do they do as the Romans? HRM practices of US subsidiaries in Europe. MIR: Management International Review, 38 (1): 47–64.
Grant, R. M. 1987. Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 18 (3): 79–89.
Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 27–48.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. 2008. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London, UK: Sage.
Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21 (2): 521–539.
Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V. 1994. Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review, 3 (4): 443–457.
Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (3): 443–475.
Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. 2002. Learning about the institutional environment. In P. Ingram, & B. S. Silverman (Eds), The new institutionalism in strategic management (Advances in strategic management, volume 19), 399–372. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Henisz, W., & Swaminathan, A. 2008. Institutions and international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 537–539.
Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. 2008. Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 540.
Jonsson, S., & Regnér, P. 2009. Normative barriers to imitation: Social complexity of core competences in a mutual fund industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (5): 517–536.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (4): 625–645.
Kostova, T. 1997. Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 215–233.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24 (1): 64–81.
Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 994–1006.
Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2009. Theorizing on MNCs: A promise for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 34 (1): 171–173.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 243–275. London, UK: Sage.
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 691–710.
Lawrence, T. B. 1999. Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25 (2): 161–187.
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds), The sage handbook of organizational studies, 215–252. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. 2009. Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. 1991. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (3): 333–363.
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. 2007. New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28 (7): 993–1012.
Lu, J. 2002. Intra- and inter-organizational imitative behavior: Institutional influences on Japanese firms’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1): 19–37.
Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Nyaw, M.-K. 2002. Mitigating liabilities of foreignness: Defensive versus offensive approaches. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 283–300.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. 2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal,, 47 (5): 657–679.
Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. 2004. Handbook of qualitative methods for international business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2): 340–363.
Meyer, K. E. 2001. Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (2): 357–367.
Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. 2005. Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 63–93.
Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S., & Peng, M. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (1): 61–80.
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (2): 235–252.
Mezias, J. M. 2002. Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (3): 229–244.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Molina, C. 2012. Understanding institutional plurality in multinational enterprises: The roles of institutional logic and social identification. In L. Tihanyi, T. M. Devinney, & T. Pedersen (Eds), Institutional theory in international business and management. Advances in International Management, Vol. 25. 399–423. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H., & Whitley, R. 2001. The multinational firm: Organizing across institutional and national divides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2002. Institutions and internation business: A theoretical overview. International Business Review, 11 (6): 635–646.
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–179.
Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9): 697–713.
Orr, R. J., & Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutional exceptions on global projects: A process model. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 562–589.
Peng, M., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5): 920–936.
Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. 2002. Coping with liability of foreignness: Different learning engagements of entrant firms. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 339–350.
Phillips, N., & Tracey, P. 2009. Institutional theory and the MNC. The Academy of Management Review, 34 (1): 169–173.
Phillips, N., Tracey, P., & Karra, N. 2009. Rethinking institutional distance: Strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management. Strategic Organization, 7 (3): 339–348.
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. 2008. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational Institutionalism, 78–98. London, UK: Sage.
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. 2003. Institutional change in Touque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108 (4): 795–843.
Regnér, P. 2001. Complexity and multiple rationalities in strategy processes. In H. W. Volberda, & T. Elfring (Eds), Rethinking strategy, 43–56. London, UK: Sage.
Regnér, P. 2003. Strategy making in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy making. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (1): 57–82.
Regnér, P. 2008. Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities – Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy. Human Relations, 61 (4): 565–588.
Regnér, P. 2010. Strategy process research and the RBV: Social barriers to imitation. In F.W. Kellermanns, & P. Mazzola (Eds), Handbook of research on strategy process, 90–108. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Regnér, P. 2012. Strategy as practice – Untangling the emergence of competitive positions. In G. B. Dagnino (Ed), Handbook of research on competitive strategy, 182–200. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Regnér, P., & Zander, U. 2011. Knowledge and strategy creation in multinational companies. Management International Review, 51 (6): 821–850.
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Nohria, N. 1994. Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (2): 229–251.
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. 1991. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 340–361.
Roth, K., & Kostova, T. 2003. The use of the multinational corporation as a research context. Journal of Management, 29 (6): 883–902.
Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (4): 715–735.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3): 237–250.
Saka-Helmhout, A., & Geppert, M. 2011. Different forms of agency and institutional influences within multinational enterprises. Management International Review, 51 (5): 567–592.
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2009. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (4): 643–671.
Sauder, M. 2008. Interlopers and field change: The entry of US News into the field of legal education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53 (2): 209–234.
Scher, M. J. 1998. Japanese interfirm networks and their main banks. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. 2006. The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24 (3): 195–227.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1990. Strategy, complexity and economic rent. Management Science, 36 (10): 1178–1192.
Scott, R. W. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 222–247.
Sewell, W. H. J. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1): 1–29.
Shi, W., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2012. Advantages of foreignness: Benefits of creative institutional deviance. Advances in International Management, 25: 99–125.
Spiggle, S. 1994. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3): 491–503.
Stake, R. E. 1994. Case studies. In N. Denizen, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, 236–247. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vernon, R. 1979. The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41 (4): 255–267.
Wan, W. P. 2005. Country resource environments, firm capabilities, and corporate diversification strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 161–182.
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mantymaki, E. 2011. Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business, 42 (5): 740–762.
Westney, D. E. 1993. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal, & D. E. Westney (Eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation. London: Macmillan Press.
Whittington, R. 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27 (5): 613–634.
Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27 (4): 608–618.
Yin, R. E. 1994. Case study research: Design & methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.
Zuckerman, E. W. 1999. The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5): 1398–1438.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Ulf Andersson and Ishtiaq Mahmood, 22 October 2013. This paper has been with the authors for four revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Regnér, P., Edman, J. MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. J Int Bus Stud 45, 275–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.66
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.66