Skip to main content
Log in

Adam Smith’s theory of knowledge and international business theory and practice

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that Adam Smith’s insights and reasoning can improve the theory of international business, and shed light on its academic practices. Smith was a system builder; his theory of knowledge underpinned his entire oeuvre, and understanding his systematic approach can help current international business to achieve a similarly coherent body of theory. Smith’s approach sheds direct light on decision-making in multinational enterprises, and on cultural distance (the “liability of foreignness”). Combining these two areas yields new Smithian insights into multinational enterprises from emerging countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This “again demonstrates Smith’s privileging empirical observation as a source, perhaps the source, of human knowledge” (Otteson, 2011: 30).

References

  • Boulding, K. E. 1966. The economics of knowledge and the knowledge of economics. American Economic Review, 56 (2): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1988. A theory of cooperation in international business. In F. J. Contractor, & P. Lorange (Eds), Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M.C. 1998. Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (1): 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 2001. Strategic complexity in international business. In A. M. Rugman, & T. L. Brewer (Eds), The Oxford handbook of international business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Hashai, N. 2004. A global system view of firm boundaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (1): 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Casson, M. C., & Gulamhussen, M. A. 2002. Internationalisation – Real options, knowledge management and the Uppsala approach. In V. Havila, M. Forsgren, & H. Hakansson (Eds), Critical perspectives on internationalisation. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A., Zheng, P., Voss, H., & Liu, X. 2007a. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. 2007b. Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice-theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision-making. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (7): 1069–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Forsans, N., & Munjal, S. 2012. Host–home country linkages and host–home country specific advantages as determinants of foreign acquisitions by Indian firms. International Business Review, 21 (5): 878–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (16): 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S. 2009. Smith’s philosophy and economic methodology. In J. T. Young (Ed), Elgar companion to Adam Smith. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. O. Hesselborn, & P. M. Wijkmon (Eds), The international allocation of economic activity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in the age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3): 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 2000. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9 (2): 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman-Barzilai, F. 2010. Adam Smith and the circles of sympathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1997. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S. 1999. Michael Polanyi’s theory of spontaneous orders. Review of Austrian Economics, 11 (1–2): 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (9): 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. 2008. Adam Smith: A moral philosopher and his political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75 (4): 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1999. Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: Evidence from Chile and India. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8 (2): 271–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. 2005. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83 (6): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. George J. Stigler (Ed), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. P. 1969. American business abroad. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. 1994. Operating flexibility, global manufacturing and the option value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40 (1): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. M. 1986. The market as an economic process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 2003. Closed models and open systems. Journal of Economic Methodology, 10 (3): 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2000. Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35 (4): 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Rui, H. 2009. An ambidexterity perspective towards multinational enterprises from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (1): 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J. 1968. Economics of inquiring, communicating, deciding. American Economic Review, 58 (2): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, Y., & De Cieri, H. 2011. Global mobility in the 21st century: Conceptualising expatriate return on investment in global firms. Management International Review, 51 (6): 897–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. 2008. Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (3): 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otteson, J. R. 2002. Adam Smith’s market place of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Otteson, J. R. 2011. Adam Smith. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. 1959. Theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D. D., & Skinner, A. S. 1980. “General introduction” by Adam Smith (1976–1980) Volume III. In W. P. D. Wightman, & J. C. Bryce (Eds), Essays on philosophical subjects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Li, J. 2007. Will China’s multinationals succeed globally or regionally? European Management Journal, 25 (5): 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, D. 2012. In the shadow of Adam Smith: Founders of Scottish economics 1700–1900. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. 2011. Erasing the invisible hand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1911. The theory of economic development. Translated by R. Opie. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Toward a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1965. Administrative behaviour. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2011. World investment report 2011: Non-equity modes of international production and development. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

  • von Mises, L. 1949. Human action: A treatise on economics, 4th revised edn. San Francisco, CA: Fox & Wilkes, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as an escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted by John Cantwell, Editor-in-Chief, 22 July 2013. This paper has been with the author for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckley, P. Adam Smith’s theory of knowledge and international business theory and practice. J Int Bus Stud 45, 102–109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.44

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.44

Keywords

Navigation