Skip to main content
Log in

On entropy and portfolio diversification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entropy, a term used in Physics to quantify the degree of randomness in a complex system, is shown to be relevant for portfolio diversification. The link between entropy and diversification lies in the notion of uncertainty. We introduce the concept of available diversification in an investment universe and of diversification curves. We build a framework for assembling a fully diversified risk parity-like portfolio with a fundamental-based high-conviction strategy, through a constrained entropy-maximisation process by which a portion of potential portfolio return is swapped for extra diversification. The main results of this study are:• mean-variance optimised portfolios are highly concentrated and scarcely related to the asset return assumptions;• few basis points of expected returns can be converted into a huge amount of extra diversification that making the portfolio allocation more robust to parameter uncertainty;• on a more conceptual ground, we investigate the relationship between portfolio risk and diversification concluding that they should be managed distinctly.The empirical analysis presented in this work shows that entropy is a useful means to alleviate the lack of diversification of portfolios on the efficient frontier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bera, A.K. and Park, S.Y. (2008) Optimal portfolio diversification using maximum entropy. Econometric Reviews 27 (4–6): 484–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, M.J. and Grauer, R.R. (1991) On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: Some analytical and computational results. Review of Financial Studies 4 (2): 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and Litterman, R. (1991) Asset allocation combining investor views with market equilibrium. Journal of Fixed Income 1 (2): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, V. and Ziemba, W.T. (1993) The effects of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Portfolio Management 19 (2): 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choueifaty, Y. and Coignard, Y. (2008) Towards maximum diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management 35 (1): 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., De Silva, H. and Thorley, S. (2013) Risk parity, maximum diversification, and minimum variance: An analytic perspective. The Journal of Portfolio Management 39 (3): 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cover, T.M. and Thomas, J.A. (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing.

  • de Laguiche, S. and Pola, G. (2012) Unexpected Returns. Methodological considerations on Expected Returns in Uncertainty, Amundi Working Paper WP-032-2012.

  • Ilmanen, A. (2011) Expected Returns. An Investor’s Guide to Harvesting Market Rewards. Wiley Finance.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jobson, J.D. and Korkie, B. (1980) Estimation for Markowitz efficient portfolios. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (371): 544–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, G.M. (2007) Battle for Investment Survival. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillard, S., Roncalli, T. and Teiletche, J. (2010) The Properties of equally weighted risk contribution portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management 36 (4): 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1952) Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martellini, L. (2008) Towards the design of better equity benchmarks. Journal of Portfolio Management 34 (4): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meucci, A. (2007) Risk and Asset Allocation. Springer Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meucci, A. (2009) Managing diversification. Risk 22 (5): 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meucci, A., Santangelo, A. and Deguest, R. (2014) Measuring Portfolio Diversification Based on Optimised Uncorrelated Factors, working paper, www.symmys.com.

  • Partovi, M.H. and Caputo, M. (2004) Principal portfolios: Recasting the efficient frontier. Economic Bulletin 7 (3): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pola, G. (2013) Diversification measures for portfolio selection. In: F. Petroni, F. Prattico and G. D’Amico (eds.) Stock Markets: Emergence, Macroeconomic Factors and Recent Developments, New York: NOVA publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pola, G. and Zerrad, A. (2014) Entropy, Diversification, and the Inefficient Frontier, Amundi Cross Asset Special Focus, April, www.amundi.com.

  • Roncalli, T. (2013) Introduction to risk parity and budgeting. Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series.

  • Rudin, M.A. and Morgan, J.S. (2006) A portfolio diversification index. The Journal of Portfolio Management 32 (2): 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The article is based on a series of lectures on quantitative finance, which the author gave at the Milan Polytechnic (MIP School of Management) since 2011, and hence he would like to thank all the students for their feedback, which helped him to further refine the subject. Moreover, he would like to thank Simone Facchinato, Sylvie de Laguiche and Ali Zerrad for very useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Pola.

Additional information

1PhD is Senior Portfolio Manager at ANIMA SGR in the Multiasset & Multimanager Division and Lecturer on Quantitative Finance at the MIP School of Management (Milan Polytechnic). Previously he worked in AMUNDI Group as Senior Quantitative Analyst (until July 2015) in Milan and Paris working on the diversified business line and advisory to international clients including Central Banks & Sovereign Wealth Funds. He holds a PhD in Computational Neuroscience from the University of Newcastle (UK) and a first class honours degree in Theoretical Physics from the University of L’Aquila (Italy).

Appendix

Appendix

Time-series details and risk-return parameters

The investment universe is composed of 12 assets: 4 bonds, 4 equities and 4 alternatives as detailed in Table A1. Risk-return parameters are given in tables A2 and A3.

Table A1 Time series details
Table A2 Expected return and Sharpe
Table A3 Ex ante risk figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pola, G. On entropy and portfolio diversification. J Asset Manag 17, 218–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2016.10

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2016.10

Keywords

Navigation