Skip to main content
Log in

From Brezhnev to Brussels: Transformations of sovereignty in Eastern Europe

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The year 1989 is widely fêted as a turning point in the history of Eastern Europe: nation-states were liberated from the tyranny of Soviet rule and regained their sovereign independence. This article challenges the conventional wisdom by arguing that the ‘limited sovereignty’ of the pre-1989 period, formally declared by Leonid Brezhnev in 1968, has been replaced by a new form of domination, this time from Brussels. However, while Eastern European states still face constraints on their political autonomy and self-government, the nature of this domination is different. Specifically, it coincides with the post-Cold War revision of the concept of sovereignty itself, where the attachment to the formal rights of sovereign independence and equality is lost. Eastern European states have found that continued limitations upon their sovereignty are today celebrated as the realization of the essence of sovereignty itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Judt (1994) usefully differentiates between Western and Eastern European illusions about 1989 and its aftermath.

  2. See, for instance, Marx and Engels’ lament on Poland's retreat from its own strength and vitality in the course of the eighteenth century (1953, p. 102).

  3. In 1526, at the battle of Mohacs, then in 1541 with the occupation of Pecs, Hungary was overrun by the Ottomans and Transylvania became a vassal of the Sultan.

  4. A poem by Polish poet, Rózewicz, on post-1989 transition. Cited in Davies (2001, p. 430).

References

  • Agh, A. (1999) Europeanisation of policmaking in East Central Europe: The Hungarian approach to EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (5): 839–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albi, A. (2005) EU Enlargement and The Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1974) Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranovsky, V. and Spanger, H.J. (1992) In from the Cold: Germany, Russia and the Future of Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2003) Chirac sparks ‘New Europe’ ire. BBC Media Review, April.

  • Bickerton, C.J. (2008) Europe's union of disenchantment. Le Monde DiplomatiqueJuly.

  • Bickerton, C., Cunliffe, P. and Gourevitch, A. (eds.) (2007) Politics without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. (1997) Divided Europe: The New Domination of the East. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. (ed.) (2006) My Dear Mr Stalin: The Complete Correspondence of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph V. Stalin. Yale, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T. (1858) Chartism. Past and Present. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. (1995) The Twenty Years’ Crisis: 1919-1939. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2004) The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. London: Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H. (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Regimes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csepeli, G. (1998) Not known, only felt: Representations of national sovereignty in Hungarian society today. In: C. Gomber, E. Hankiss, L. Lengyel and G. Varnai (eds.) The Appeal of Sovereignty: Hungary, Austria and Russia. Boulder, CO: Atlantic Research and Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. (2001) Heart of Europe: The Past in Poland's Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A. (2002) Enlargement, Institution-buidling and the EU's administrative capacity requirement. Western European Politics 25 (4): 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djilas, M. (2000) Tito: The Story from Inside. London: The Phoenix Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2008) Trust me. 29 May.

  • Economist. (2009) A new colonialism. 21 March, p. 43.

  • Furedi, F. (1986) Soviet Union Demystified: A Materialist Analysis. London: Junius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton Ash, T. (1990) La chaudiere: Europe centrale 1980-1990. Paris, France: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton Ash, T. (1999) History of the Present. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombar, C. (1998) By the time sovereignty fell into our laps it had become obsolete. In: C. Gomber, E. Hankiss, L. Lengyel and G. Varnai (eds.) The Appeal of Sovereignty: Hungary, Austria and Russia. Boulder, CO: Atlantic Research and Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2001) How does Europeanisation affect CEE governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 1013–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, A.M. (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, A. and Innes, A. (2003) Great expectations: The EU and domestic political competition in East Central Europe. East European Politics and Societies 17: 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. (2008) EU censures Bulgaria by freezing aid. 24 July.

  • Havel, V. (1988) Anti-political politics. In: J. Keane (ed.) Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heartfield, J. (2002) The ‘Death of the Subject’ Explained. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Hallam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley, F.H. (1966) Sovereignty. London: C.A. Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1953) Leviathan. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1994) Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Sassen, G. and Gordon, C. (2002) Saying ‘Maybe’ to the return to Europe. European Union Politics 3 (3): 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R.H. (1990) Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (1988) The dilemmas of dissidence: The politics of opposition in East-Central Europe. Eastern European Politics and Societies 2 (2): 185–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (1994) Nineteen eighty-nine: The end of which European era? Daedalus 123 (3): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2005) Postwar. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kende, P. (2004) Le Défi Hongrois: de Trianon à Bruxelles. Paris, France: Buchet Chastel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1995) Hobbes’ Dilemma and institutional change in world politics: Sovereignty in international society. In: H.H. Holm and G. Sorensen (eds.) Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the New World Order. Oxford: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. (1991) Stalinism in Crisis. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, G. (1969) The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943–45. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Chichester, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, I. (2007) The strange death of the liberal consensus. Journal of Democracy 18 (4): 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. (1982) On the notion of ‘Interest’ in international relations. International Organization 36 (1): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacqueur, W. (1992) Europe in Our Time. A History 1945-1992. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laïdi, Z. (2004) La Grande Perturbation. Paris, France: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (1987) The Truce. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, K. (1996) The Meaning of Race: Race, History and Culture in Western Society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malova, D. and Haughton, T. (2002) Making institutions in Central and Eastern Europe, and the impact of Europe. Western European Politics 25 (2): 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1974) One Dimensional Man. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1953) The Russian Menace in Europe. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A.J. (1968) Politics and Diplomacy of Peacemaking: Containment and Counterrevolution at Versailles, 1918-1919. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazower, M. (1998) Dark Continent: Europe's Twentieth Century. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazower, M. (2008) Hitler's Empire: Nazi Rule in Occupied Europe. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michnik, A. (1999) The Return of History. Speech at Forum 2000 Conference. Prague, 12 October.

  • Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2007) EU accession is no ‘End of History’. Journal of Democracy 18 (4): 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, F. (1983) Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism 1933-1944. New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1996) Varieties of Capitalism: The East European and East German Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ost, D. (2005) The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raik, K. (2004) EU accession of Central and Eastern European Countries: Democracy and integration as conflicting logics. East European Politics and Societies 18 (4): 567–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosdolsky, R. (1986) Engels and the ‘Nonhistoric’ Peoples: The National Question in the Revolutions of 1848. Glasgow, UK: Critique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (1994) The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2006) Democracy Past and Future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008) Counter-democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. (2004) Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.M. (2004) A New World Order. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.J.P. (1991) The Origins of the Second World War. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachudova, M.A. (2005) Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vulliamy, E. (2004) In from the cold. Guardian 11 April.

  • Whitehead, L. (2001) Democracy and decolonization: East-Central Europe. In: L. Whitehead (ed.) The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000) Ready for Europe: Public Administration Reform and European Union Accession in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Žižek, S. (2008) In Defence of Lost Causes. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bickerton, C. From Brezhnev to Brussels: Transformations of sovereignty in Eastern Europe. Int Polit 46, 732–752 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.20

Keywords

Navigation