Abstract
There is a long tradition in comparative research on industrial relations of analysis concentrating on differences and similarities between countries, that is, focusing on aggregates measured at the national level. But what happens if there are no (more) differences in industrial relations systems between countries? If there are not differences the question arises if comparative research is becoming meaningless? Concentrating predominantly on statistical and methodological aspects, it is argued in this article that over recent decades industrial relations systems have changed in such a way that the national level has become less relevant as a unit of analysis. It is explained that this development in the nature of the field affects the measurement of its indicators which form the backbone of any comparison. On the basis of an empirical comparison of key industrial relations indicators in the European Union member states, it is concluded that comparative research has not reached a dead end, but rather that the field might have to reconsider the relevant unit for analysis. It is shown that the relevant unit for analysis has shifted increasingly from the national towards the sectoral level. One consequence of this shift is that from a methodological perspective comparisons between sectors, rather than between countries, are nowadays often more informative.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a recent and comprehensive overview of reforms and changes see for example European Commission (2015).
Good examples are the theoretical and empirical debates on the role of the institutional structures of collective bargaining by Calmfors and Driffill (1988), Soskice (1990), and Traxler (1995). For more information see Brandl (2012) and for the political implications see Aumayr-Pintar et al (2014).
For reasons of availability of data Croatia was not considered in the study so that only the remaining twenty-seven EU member states were analysed.
For an overview and discussions on the impact of the NPMP in various sectors and in particular in the railway and in other sectors see for example European Commission (2013) and Vaughan-Whitehead (2013).
See for example Doellgast and Greer (2007) for evidence of German industrial relations.
For details see Eurofound (2015).
For the robustness tests various additional (sets of) sectors available by Eurofound (2015) were investigated.
For such a data structure and research question the use of a Multilevel Analysis would be advantageous.
References
Arrowsmith, J. and Pulignano, V. (eds.) (2013) The Transformation of Employment Relations in Europe. Institutions and Outcomes in the Age of Globalization, Abingdon: Routledge.
Aumayr-Pintar, C., Cabrita, J., Fernández-Macías, E. and Vacas-Soriano, C. (2014) Pay in Europe in the 21st Century, Dublin: Eurofound.
Bach, S. and Bordogna, L. (2011) ‘Varieties of new public management or alternative models? The reform of public service employment relations in industrialized democracies’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22 (11): 2281–2394.
Bamber, G., Lansbury, R. and Wailes, N. (2010) International and Comparative Employment Relations, London: SAGE.
Bechter, B., Brandl, B. and Meardi, G. (2011a) From National to Sectoral Industrial Relations: Developments in Sectoral Industrial Relations in the EU, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
Bechter, B., Brandl, B. and Meardi, G. (2011b) ‘Die Bestimmungsgründe der (Re-) Sektoralisierung der industriellen Beziehungen in der Europäischen Union’, Industrielle Beziehungen 18 (3): 143–166.
Bechter, B., Brandl, B. and Meardi, G. (2012) ‘Sectors or countries? Typologies and levels of analysis in comparative industrial relations’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 18 (3): 185–202.
Brandl, B. (2012) ‘Successful wage concertation: The economic effects of wage pacts and their alternatives’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 50 (3): 482–501.
Brandl, B. and Traxler, F. (2011) ‘Labour relations, economic governance and the crisis: Turning again the tide?’ Labor History 52 (1): 1–22.
Calmfors, L. and Driffill, J. (1988) ‘Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic performance’, Economic Policy 3 (6): 13–61.
Clegg, H. (1976) Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining: A Theory Based on Comparisons of Six Countries, Oxford: Blackwell.
Crouch, C. (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doellgast, V. and Greer, I. (2007) ‘Vertical disintegration and the disorganization of German industrial relations’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 45 (1): 55–76.
Eurofound. (2015) European representativeness studies, available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/representativeness.htm, accessed 12 March 2015.
European Commission. (2009) Industrial Relations in Europe Report 2008, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2013) Industrial Relations in Europe Report 2012, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2015) Industrial Relations in Europe Report 2014, Brussels: European Commission.
Ferner, A. and Hyman, R. (eds.) (1998) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, Oxford: Blackwell.
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyman, R. (2001) ‘The Europeanisation – Or the erosion – Of industrial relations?’ Industrial Relations Journal 32 (4): 280–294.
Katz, H. and Darbishire, O. (2000) Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems, Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Marginson, P. and Sisson, K. (2004) European Integration and Industrial Relations. Multi-level Governance in the Making, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Meardi, G. (2004) ‘Modelli o stili di sindacalismo in Europa?’ Stato e Mercato 71 (2): 207–235.
Meardi, G. (2013) ‘Systems of Employment Relations in Central Eastern Europe’, in J. Arrowsmith and V. Pulignano (eds.) The Transformation of Employment Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 69–87.
Soskice, D. (1990) ‘Wage determination: The changing role of institutions in advanced industrialized countries’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6 (4): 36–61.
Traxler, F. (1995) ‘Farewell to labour market associations? Organized versus disorganized decentralization as a map for industrial relations’, in C. Crouch and F. Traxler (eds.) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?, Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 3–19.
Traxler, F. (2010) ‘The long-term development of organized business and its implications for corporatism: A cross-national comparison of membership, activities and governing capacities of business interest associations’, European Journal of Political Research 49 (2): 151–173.
Traxler, F., Kittel, B. and Blaschke, S. (2001) National Labour Relations in Internationalized Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (ed.) (2013) Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Vernon, G. (2006) ‘Does density matter? The significance of comparative historical variation in unionization’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 12 (2): 189–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
bechter, b., brandl, b. measurement and analysis of industrial relations aggregates: what is the relevant unit of analysis in comparative research?. Eur Polit Sci 14, 422–438 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.65
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.65