Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of online social value on satisfaction and continued use of social media

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Social media offers customers a unique service value proposition. Recognizing service value as a pivotal concept, this study develops an aggregate construct of online social value, whereby customers evaluate utilitarian and hedonic benefits relative to what they must sacrifice in effort and risk in deriving a value calculation of online social networking services which predicts satisfaction and continued use of online social media, such as Facebook. By empirically testing a model that explains online social value, this research contributes to information systems (IS) theory by introducing a customer value perspective in the social media context and helps service providers by identifying factors predicting satisfaction and continued use that might be employed to improve offerings to keep customers coming back.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal R and Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 (4), 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algesheimer R, Dhalakia UM and Herrmann A (2005) The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing 69 (1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2013) Google to take home half of $16.65 billion worldwide mobile ad market. http://www.eMarketer.com [WWW document] http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Facebook-Sees-Big-Gains-Global-Mobile-Ad-Market-Share/1010171 (accessed 2 January 2012).

  • Aral S, Dellarocas C and Godes D (2013) Social media and business transformation: a framework for research. Information Systems Research 24 (1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurier P and N’Goala G (2010) The differing and mediating roles of trust and relationship commitment in service relationship maintenance and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38 (2), 303–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R and Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker J, Parasuraman D and Grewal D (2002) The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing 66 (2), 120–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki H, Titah R and Boffo C (2007) Information systems use-related activity: an expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information systems use. Information Systems Research 18 (2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM and Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer J (2011) Google versus facebook. Canadian Business 84 (14), 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25 (3), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau P (1994) Structural Contexts of Opportunities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blocker CP, Flint DJ, Myers MB and Slater SF (2011) Proactive customer orientation and its role for creating customer value in global markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39 (2), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau M, Gefen D and Straub D (2001) Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly 25 (1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P and Wacquant L (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd D and Ellison N (2007) Social network sites: definition, history and scholarship. [WWW document] http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html (accessed 5 May 2008).

  • Brady MK, Knight GA, Cronin JJ, Tomas G, Hult M and Keillor BD (2005) Removing the contextual lens: a multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models. Journal of Retailing 81 (3), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J and Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social practice perspective. Organization Science 12 (2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno A (2011) Whither Google plus. Billboard 123 (35), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones A and Straub DW (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research 17 (3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenfetelli RT and Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 33 (4), 689–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandon P, Morwitz VG and Reinartz WL (2005) Do intention really predict behavior? self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing 69 (1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen I (2007) The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communities: a longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science 33 (4), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin W (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (Marcoulidea G, Ed), pp 295–336, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Mahwah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin W, Marcolin B and Newsted P (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 (2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin W, Thatcher J and Wright R (2012) Assessing common method bias: problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly 36 (3), 1003–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitturi R, Raghunatha R and Mahajan V (2008) Delight by design: the role of hedonic and utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing 72 (1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill G (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook K (2000) Charting futures for sociology: structure and action. Contemporary Sociology 29 (5), 685–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos A and Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management 17 (4), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos A and Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinev T and Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research 17 (1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath J (2007) Signals in social supernets. [WWW document] http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donath.html (accessed 5 May 2008).

  • Ellemers N, Kortekaas P and Ouwerkerk WJ (1999) Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identify. European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (2–3), 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison N, Steinfield C and Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook friends: exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. [WWW document] http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html (accessed 5 May 2008).

  • Emerson R (1969) Operant psychology and exchange theory. In Behavioral Sociology (Burgess R and Don B, Eds), pp 379–708, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson R (1976) Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 2, 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders A, Hungenberg H, Denker H and Mauch S (2008) The long tail of social networking: revenue models of social networking sites. European Management Journal 26 (3), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint DJ, Woodruff RB and Gardial SF (2002) Exploring the phenomenon of customers’ desired value change in a business-to-business context. Journal of Marketing 66 (1), 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C and Larcker VF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frommer D (2012) How does facebook make money? [WWW document] http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/how-does-facebook-make-money.php (accessed 22 May 2012).

  • Gefen D (2002) Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 3 (1), 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D and Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the AIS 16 (1), 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani A and Deshpande S (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. Journal of Psychology 128 (4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strong of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath TB, Chatterjee S and France R (1995) Mental accounting and changes in price: the frame dependence of reference dependence. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1), 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook MB (1994) The nature of customer value: an axiology of services in the consumption experience. In Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice (Roland TR and Richard LO, Eds), pp 21–71, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Homans G (1961) Social Behavior. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston FS and Gassenheimer JB (1987) Marketing and exchange. Journal of Marketing 51 (4), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istrategylabs.com (2010) Facebook demographics and statistics report 2010. [WWW document] http://www.istrategylabs.com/2010/01/facebook-demographics-and-statistics-report-2010-145-growth-in-1-year (accessed 2 February 2011).

  • Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB and Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MD, Herrmann A and Huber F (2006) The evolution of loyalty intentions. Journal of Marketing 70 (2), 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli A, Yan B and Wei K (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 29 (1), 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna E, Straub D and Chervany N (1999) Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23 (2), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettinger WJ, Park S and Smith J (2009) Understanding the consequences of information systems service quality in IS service reuse: a behavioral intentions model. Information & Management 46 (6), 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa M and Liu V (2007) Online customer retention: contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (6), 780–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S and Son J (2009) Out of dedication or constraint? a dual model of post-adoption phenomena and its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quarterly 33 (1), 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen M, Ruyter K and Wetzels M (2007) An assessment of value creation in mobile service to delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. Journal of Retailing 83 (1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnova H, Spiekermann S, Koroleva K and Hildebrand T (2010) Online social networks: why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology 25 (2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EJ (2001) An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology 107 (2), 321–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A and Zickuhr K (2010) Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. [WWW document] http://uploadi.www.ris.org/editor/1267315614PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report.pdf (accessed 6 August 2014).

  • Li C and Bernoff J (2008) Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Harvard Business Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmoller JB (1989) Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physical-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM and JARVIS CB (2005) The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioural and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (4), 710–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathwick C, Malhortra C and Rigdon E (2001) Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing 77 (1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal V, Kumar P and Tsiros M (1999) Attribute level performance, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions over time: a consumption-system approach. Journal of Marketing 63 (2), 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschis GP (2007) Life course perspectives on consumer behavior. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 35 (2), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunally J and Bernstein I (1994) Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1993) Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (3), 418–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1999) Whence consumer loyalty. Journal of Marketing 63 (4), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivera F, Goodman PS and Tan SS (2008) Contribution behaviors in distributed environment. MIS Quarterly 32 (1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A (1997) Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (2), 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou P and Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research 15 (1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou P, Liang H and Xue Y (2007) Understanding and migrating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly 31 (1), 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter S, Straub D and Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs information systems research. MIS Quarterly 31 (4), 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Lee J and Podsakoff N (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM and Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4), 531–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravald A and Gronroos C (1996) The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing 30 (2), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen C (2007) Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. New Atlantis 17 (Summer), 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton G (1980) A progress report on information privacy and data security. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 31 (2), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J and Sabol B (2002) Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing 66 (1), 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D (1989) Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly 13 (2), 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D, Boudreau M and Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of Association for Information Systems 13 (1), 380–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney JC and Soutar GN (2001) Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing 77 (2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S and Todd PA (1995a) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 (2), 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S and Todd PA (1995b) Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19 (4), 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M, Vinzi EV, Chatelin YM and Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48 (1), 159–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science 4 (3), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R (1999) Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 (3), 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong J, Vekatesh V, Xu X, Hong S and Tam K (2011) Consumer acceptance of personal information and communication technology services. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58 (4), 613–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusov M, Bucklin RE and Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings form and internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing 73 (5), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuunainen V, Pitkanen O and Hovi M (2009) Users’ awareness of privacy on online social networking sites – case Facebook. In Proceedings of the 22nd Bled eConference on eEnablement: Facilitating an Open, Effective, and Representative eSociety, 14–17 June, Bled, Slovenia.

  • Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 (4), 695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Slyke C, Ilie V, Lou H and Stafford T (2007) Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (3), 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance A (2011) It’s war! Bloomberg Businessweek 42 (60), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL and Akaka MA (2009) Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Service Science 1 (1), 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL and Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68 (1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varki S and Colgate M (2001) The role of price perceptions in an integrated model of behavioral intentions. Journal of Service Research 3 (3), 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM and Bala H (2008) Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly 32 (3), 483–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G and Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Hu PJ and Brown SA (2011) Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Information Systems Journal 21 (6), 527–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Thong JYL and Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly 36 (1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield RL and Whitten D (2006) Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3), 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LC, Baker J, Wagner JA and Wakefield K (2007) Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing 71 (3), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward S (2007) MySpace discovery. ABA Journal 93 (34), 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schroder G and Van Oppen C (2009) Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly 33 (1), 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Teo H, Tan BCY and Agarwal R (2009) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (3), 135–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z and Peterson RT (2004) Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing 21 (10), 799–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafirovski M (2003) Some amendments to Social Exchange Theory: a sociological perspective. Theory & Science. [WWW document] http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol004.002/01_zafirovski.html (accessed 19 April 2008).

  • Zeithaml V (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52 (3), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Bolton R, Deighton J, Keiningham TL, Lemon KN and Petersen JA (2006) Forward-looking focus: can firms have adaptive foresight? Journal of Service Research 9 (2), 168–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendix A

Respondent demographics

Table A1

Table A1 Demographics of respondents (N=518)

Appendix B

Measurement scales

Table B1

Table B1 Definitions and sources of constructs

Appendix C

Formative construct of continued use

Three measurement indicators of continued use were usage duration, frequency, and intensity (Venkatesh et al, 2008; Aurier & N’Goala, 2010). On the basis of the decision rules outlined in Jarvis et al (2003) and our analysis of measurement characteristics of continued use, we utilize a formative construct conceptualization. With relatively high correlations for duration and frequency (0.57), duration and intensity (0.50), and frequency and intensity (0.55), the conceptualization of continued use allows us to examine the structural effect of the given latent construct as opposed to that of multiple individual variables, enhancing the theoretical parsimony of the research model (Cenfetelli & Bassellier, 2009), reflecting a richer, higher-order construct (Burton-Jones & Straub, 2006).

Following established guidelines for testing indicator collinearity and validity of formative constructs, we conducted PLS analysis and presented a validity test model for the measurement of continued use as shown in Figure C1. We find maximum variance inflation factor of 1.37 is below the recommended cut-off value of 3.33 (Diamantopoulos & Siguaw, 2006; Petter et al, 2007). Thus, no indication of multicollinearity exists. Figure C1 illustrates the measurement validity of the formative construct using the weight or partial effect of the indicators on the intended construct (Cenfetelli & Bassellier, 2009). Each indictor’s effect on continued use (β=0.40 for duration, 0.41 for frequency, and 0.39 for intensity) are significant (P<0.001), supporting its formative nature (Barki et al, 2007). Finally, in validating the external validity of continued use, we examined the proposed nomological relationships (Diamantopoulos & Winklhofer, 2001), finding acceptable model fit (APC=0.349, P<0.001; ARS=0.251, P=<0.001; AVIF=1.372). The PLS results in Figure C1 demonstrate the significant relationships between online social value and continued use (β=0.11, P<0.001), and satisfaction and continued use (β=0.43, P<0.001), with online social value and satisfaction explaining 24% of the variance in continued use. This supports the external validity of continued use as a formative construct.

Figure C1
figure 4

Validity test for continued use.

Appendix D

Second-order reflective constructs of utilitarian and hedonic benefits

For the utilitarian benefits construct, we estimated the first-order measurement model with eight relational and informational benefit indictors. For hedonic benefits, we also estimated the first-order measurement model with seven enjoyment and curiosity fulfillment indicators. Both estimations illustrate support for the models. We used a hierarchical components approach to estimate the second-order reflective constructs (Lohmoller, 1989; Tenenhaus et al, 2005), and created a reflective hierarchical construct model (Wetzels et al, 2009). As illustrated in Figure D1, the CR, AVE, and Cronbach’s α of the two second-order reflective measures show that the internal reliability of the two second-order constructs is greater than the recommended threshold of 0.70, and the AVEs are equal to or greater than the recommended threshold of 0.50 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981; Bagozzi & Yi, 1988; Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994; Chin, 1998). Also demonstrated in Figure C1, the loadings of the first-order latent variables on the second-order constructs are all significant. The analyses support that the first-order dimensions are reflective indicators of the second-order constructs.

Figure D1
figure 5

PLS results of second-order reflective constructs.

Notes: AVE=Average Variance Extracted and CR=Composite Reliability

Figure D1

Appendix E

Mediation of satisfaction

To illustrate the partial mediating effect of satisfaction on the influence of online social value to continued use, we follow the three-step analysis espoused by Baron & Kenny (1986). First, we found that online social value alone had a positive direct effect on continued use (β=0.53, R2=0.28, P<0.001); second, we found that online social value had a positive direct effect on the mediator, satisfaction (β=0.67, R2=0.47, P<0.001). Finally, we found that online social value and satisfaction jointly had a positive significant effect on continued use (β=0.37, P<0.001; β=0.26, P<0.001, respectively; R2=0.32). These results support that the influence of value calculations on continued use is partially mediated by satisfaction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, T., Kettinger, W. & Poston, R. The effect of online social value on satisfaction and continued use of social media. Eur J Inf Syst 24, 391–410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.22

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.22

Keywords

Navigation