Advertisement

Eastern Economic Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 352–361 | Cite as

Abortion, Contraception, and Non-Marital Births: Re-Interpreting the Akerlof-Yellen-Katz Model of Pre-Marital Sex and Shotgun Marriage

  • Saul D Hoffman
Original Article

Abstract

In a well-known paper, Akerlof, Yellen, and Katz proposed a counter-intuitive explanation for the rise of non-marital births in the United States that emphasized how birth control and abortion weakened the responsibility of men to their unmarried partner’s pregnancy. The paper is regularly cited by social conservatives to support measures to restrict sex education and access to contraception and abortion. I argue that this use of the paper’s findings stems from specific modeling assumptions about “types” of women. I present a reformulation of the model using more reasonable “types” that generates precisely the same results, but with radically different policy implications.

Keywords

non-marital birth contraception abortion 

Keywords

J12 J13 J16 

References

  1. Aisch, Gregor, and Bill Marsh. 2014. How Likely is it that Birth Control could Let You Down? The New York Times (September 13).Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, George A., Janet L. Yellen, and Michael L. Katz. 1996. An Analysis of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2): 277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachu, Amara. 1999. Trends in Premarital Childbearing: 1930 to 1994. Current Population Reports, Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 23–197.Google Scholar
  4. Boonstra, Heather D., and Elizabeth Nash. 2014. A Surge of State Abortion Restrictions Puts Providers — and the Women they Serve — in the Crosshairs. Guttmacher Policy Review, 17(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  5. Daniels, Kimberly, Jill Daugherty, and Jo Jones. 2014. Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. NCHS Data Brief, National Center for Health Statistics (No. 173), Washington DC.Google Scholar
  6. Duncan, Greg J., and Saul D. Hoffman. 1990. Welfare Benefits, Economic Opportunities, and Out-of-Wedlock Births among Black Teenage Girls. Demography, 27(4): 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eberstadt, Mary. 2014. Adam and Eve After the Pill: Paradoxes of the Sexual Revolution. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Guttmacher Institute. 2015. Fact Sheet: Contraceptive Use in the United States, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html.
  10. Jaccard, James. 2010. Careful, Current, and Consistent: Tips to Improve Contraceptive Use. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, R. K., L. B. Finer, and S. Singh. 2010. Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients, 2008. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, R. K., and J. Dreweke. 2011. Countering Conventional Wisdom: New Evidence on Religion and Contraceptive Use. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Kaye, Kelleen, Katherine Suellentrop, and Corinna Sloup. 2009. The Fog Zone: How Misperceptions, Magical Thinking, and Ambivalence Put Young Adults at Risk for Unplanned Pregnancy. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.Google Scholar
  14. Lundberg, Shelly, and Robert D. Plotnick. 1995. Adolescent Premarital Childbearing: Do Economic Incentives Matter? Journal of Labor Economics, 13(2): 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moffitt, Robert. 1992. Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(1): 1–61.Google Scholar
  16. Murray, Charles. 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Nash, Elizabeth, Rachel Benson Gold, Andrea Rowan, Gwendolynl Rathbun, and Yana Vierboom. 2014. Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2013 State Policy Review. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  18. New, Michael. 2013. Should Pro-Lifers be Held Accountable for Single-Parent Families? National Review (February 15).Google Scholar
  19. Peipert, Jeffrey F., Tessa Madden, Jenifer E. Allsworth, and Gina M. Secura. 2012. Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing no-Cost Contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 120(6): 1291–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfundstein, Greg. 2011. The Misguided Birth-Control Crusade Continues. National Review (August 2).Google Scholar
  21. Phelps, Scott. 2013. Prepared Testimony for the Illinois State Legislative Hearings on HB 2675. Mt. Prospect, IL: Abstinence & Marriage Education Partnership.Google Scholar
  22. Shattuck, Rachel M., and Rose M. Kreider. 2013. Social and Economic Characteristics of Currently Unmarried Women with a Recent Birth: 2011. American Community Survey Reports. Vol. ACS-21, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  23. Sullivan, Gail. 2014. How Colorado’s Teen Birthrate Dropped 40% in Four Years. Washington Post.Google Scholar
  24. Trussell, James. 2011. Contraceptive Failure in the United States. Contraception, 83(5): 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilcox, W. Bradford. 2005. The Fact of Life and Marriage: Social Science and the Vindication of Christian Moral Teaching. Touchstone (January/February).Google Scholar
  26. Wilcox, W. Bradford. 2008. A Scientific Review of Abstinence and Abstinence Programs, Technical Assistance Module for Abstinence Education Grantees. Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EEA 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saul D Hoffman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics, University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations