Skip to main content
Log in

Media Reputation of a Firm and Extent of Trade Credit Supply

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A positive corporate reputation is generally taken to be a valuable intangible resource leading to competitive advantage. In this paper we examine the association between a firm's media reputation and the amount of trade credit given in a sample of listed UK firms. We argue that media reputation is instrumental in mitigating customer information asymmetry. Consistent with expectations, our results show that a firm's willingness to extend trade credit to its customers is inversely related to its media reputation. The better its reputation, the less trade credit it allows. Moreover, the effect of media reputation on trade credit supply is stronger for younger firms and smaller firms, suggesting that media reputation is more effective in reducing trade credit given for firms lacking a well-established product performance reputation. These results document one of the ways in which corporate reputation, as an intangible resource, creates value for a firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The reputation literature is quite equivocal on the cognitive dimensions used to describe reputation content. A common (literature review-based) attribute list is offered by Gardberg and Fombrun (2002), comprising six attributes of reputation: Overall corporate appeal, Products and services, Vision and leadership, Financial performance, Workplace environment and Social responsibility. Overall corporate appeal would coincide with the overall affective dimension, whereas product reputation (Products and services) would be one of the five cognitive dimensions.

  2. In this regard, Fombrun and Shanley (1990) show that firms with more positive and non-negative news coverage enjoyed higher rankings in Fortune Magazine’s ‘Most Admired of the Year’ special issue.

  3. Other-referencing refers to cases where firm names are mentioned in a subsidiary role, as a kind of comparison to the featured main firm.

  4. The random effects procedure assumes that individual effects are uncorrelated with the independent variables. If the random effects assumption holds, the random effects model is more efficient than the fixed effects model. However, if this assumption does not hold (ie, if the Hausman test fails), the random effects model is not consistent. The Hausman test compares a more efficient model with a less efficient but consistent one, to make sure that the results of the more efficient model are also consistent. The Hausman test results in an insignificant p-value, which means that it is safe to use random effects.

References

  • Abrahamson, E. and Amir, E. (1996) ‘The information content of the president’s letter to shareholders’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23 (8), 1157–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, W., Cormier, D. and Magnan, M. (2008) ‘Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective’, Ecological Economics, 64 (3), 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanasova, C. and Wilson, N. (2004) ‘Disequilibrium in the UK corporate loan market’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 28 (3), 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. and Clelland, I. (2004) ‘Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment’, The Academy of Management Journal, 47 (3), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastos, R. and Pindado, J. (2013) ‘Trade credit during a financial crisis: A panel data analysis’, Journal of Business Research, 66 (5), 614–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista Delgado-García, J., de Quevedo-Puente, E. and Díez-Esteban, J. M. (2013) ‘The impact of corporate reputation on firm risk: A panel data analysis of Spanish quoted firms’, British Journal of Management, 24 (1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. B. (1993) Reputation, Image, and Impression Management, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. E. (2004) ‘How the mass media influence perceptions of corporate reputation: Exploring agenda-setting effects within business news coverage’, PhD thesis, University of Southern California, LA.

  • Carroll, C. E. and McCombs, M. E. (2003) ‘Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations’, Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (1), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., Cohen, C. and Krentler, K. A. (2006) ‘Corporate reputation and shareholders’ intentions: An attitudinal perspective’, Brand Management, 13 (6), 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, W. G. and Kim, Y. (2003) ‘Trade credit and the effect of macro-financial shocks: Evidence from US panel data’, Washington, US International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper.

  • Deegan, C. and Gordon, B (1996) ‘A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations’, Accounting and Business Research, 26 (3), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (2000) ‘Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories’, Journal of Management, 26 (6), 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloof, M. and Jegers, M. (1996) ‘Trade credit, product quality, and intragroup trade: Some European evidence’, The Journal of Financial Management Association, 25 (3), Autumn 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einwiller, S. A., Carroll, C. E. and Korn, K. (2010) ‘Under what conditions do the news media influence corporate reputation? The role of media dependency and need for orientation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 12 (4), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. and Kramer, R. M. (1996) ‘Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (3), 442–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, G. (1988) ‘Positive theories of trade credit’, Advances in Working Capital Management, 1, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L. and Peress, J. (2009) ‘Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns’, Journal of Finance, 64 (5), 2023–2052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. and Shanley, M. (1990) ‘What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, N. A. and Fombrun, C. J. (2002) ‘The global reputation quotient project: First steps towards a cross-nationally valid measure of corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (4), 303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., Burkart, M. and Ellingsen, T. (2011) ‘What you sell is what you lend? Explaining trade credit contracts’, The Review of Financial Studies, 24 (4), 1261–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1992) ‘The strategic analysis of intangible resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 13 (2), 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. (1977) ‘Mere exposure’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 39–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, S. A. and Hoch, S. J. (1992) ‘Low-involvement learning: Memory without evaluation’, Journal of Customer Research, 19 (2), 212–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. and Tversky, A. (1991) ‘Preferences and beliefs: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4 (1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1976) ‘The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator of such models’, The Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5 (4), 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979) ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica, 47 (1), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. and Fadner, R. (1965) ‘The coefficient of imbalance’, in H. Lasswell and N. Leites Associates (eds.), Language of Politics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. and Michela, J. L. (1980) ‘Attribution theory and research’, Annual Review of Psychology, 31 (February), 457–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestens, K., Van Cauwenberge, P. and Vander Bauwhede, H. (2012) ‘Trade credit and company performance during the 2008 financial crisis’, Accounting and Finance, 52 (4), 1125–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A. and Kinder, D. R. (1990) ‘Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming’, American Political Science Review, 84 (2), 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. and Sunstein, C. (1999) ‘Availability cascades and risk regulation’, Stanford Law Review, 51 (4), 683–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D., Lee, P. M. and Dai, Y. (2011) ‘Organizational reputation: A review’, Journal of Management, 37 (1), 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., Ya, P. S. and Li, X. (2002) ‘Partially supervised classification of text documents’, Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2002), Sydney, Australia.

  • Liu, B., Dai, X., Li, W. S. and Yo, P. (2003) ‘Building text classifiers using positive and unlabeled examples’, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’03), Melbourne, Florida.

  • Long, M. S., Ileen, B. M. and Ravid, S. A. (1993) ‘Trade credit, quality guarantees, and product marketability’, Financial Management, 22 (4), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, I., Preve, L. A. and Sarria-Allende, V. (2007) ‘Trade credit and bank credit: Evidence from recent financial crises’, Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L. (1998) ‘The very visible hand of reputational rankings in US business schools’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (3), 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. H. (1960) ‘Mercantile credit, monetary policy and size of firms’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 42 (4), 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. L. and Smith Jr. C. W. (1992) ‘Accounts receivable management policy: Theory and evidence’, Journal of Finance, 47 (1), 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C., Smith, J. and Smith, R. (1999) ‘Evidence on the determinants of credit terms used in interfirm trade’, Journal of Finance, 54 (3), 1109–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. and Boden, R. (2008) ‘The secret life of UK trade credit supply: Setting a new research agenda’, The British Accounting Review, 40 (3), 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A. and Rajan, R. G. (1994) ‘The benefit of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data’, Journal of Finance, 49 (1), 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A. and Rajan, R. G. (1995) ‘The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2), 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A. and Rajan, R. G. (1997) ‘Trade credit: Theories and evidence’, The Review of Financial Studies, 10 (3), 661–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R. H., Cheng, N. S. and Chadwick, L. (1998) Managing Trade Credit for Competitive Advantage: A Study of Large UK Companies, CIMA Publishing, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R, Cheng, N. S., Cravens, K. and Lamminmaki, D. (2005) ‘Trade credit terms: Asymmetric information and price discrimination evidence from three continents’, Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, 32 (5-6), 1197–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. G. and Rindova, V. (2003) ‘Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings’, Academy of Management Journal, 46 (5), 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1994) ‘The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895-1912’, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (S1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1998) ‘Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit customer watchdog organizations’, American Journal of Sociology, 103 (4), 912–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Morrill, C. and Mayer, N.Z. (2000) ‘Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Greve, H.R. and Davis, G.F. (2001) ‘Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (3), 502–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P. and Sever, J. M. (2005) ‘Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation’, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (6), 1033–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W. P. and Dowling, G. R. (2002) ‘Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. A. (1974) ‘An economic model of trade credit’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9 (4), 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. A. and Whitcomb, D. K. (1978) ‘Implicit transfers in the extension of trade credit’, in K. E. Boulding and T. F. Wilson (eds.), Redistribution Through the Financial System: The Grants Economics of Money and Credit, Boulding, Praeger Special Studies, New York, pp. 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1982) ‘Consumer information, product quality, and seller reputation’, Journal of Economics, 13 (1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, P. G. (1992) Reputation Risk Management, Pitman Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K. (1987) ‘Trade credit and informational asymmetry’, Journal of Finance, 42 (4), 863–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, B. and Wilson, N. (1997) ‘An empirical study of the demand for trade credit in UK manufacturing firms’, UK: University of Bradford Management Centre, Working paper no. 9717.

  • Summers, B. and Wilson, N. (1999) ‘An empirical investigation of trade credit extension’, Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual PACAP/FMA Finance Conference, Singapore.

  • Van den Bogaerd, M. and Aerts, W. (2011) ‘Applying machine learning in accounting research’, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (10), 13414–13424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horen, N. (2007) ‘Customer market power and the provision of trade credit: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Central Asia’, Germany: University Library of Munich, MPRA paper 3378.

  • Vella, F. (2000) ‘Estimating models with sample selection bias: A survey’, Journal of Human Resources, 33 (1), 127–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K. and Camerer, C. (1988) ‘Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications’, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B. and Zuo, B. (2009) ‘Reliable negative extracting based on kNN for learning from positive and unlabeled examples’, Journal of Computers, 4 (1), 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van den Bogaerd, M., Aerts, W. Media Reputation of a Firm and Extent of Trade Credit Supply. Corp Reputation Rev 17, 28–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2013.24

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2013.24

Keywords

Navigation