Skip to main content
Log in

Individual Perceptions of Distributional Fairness in China

  • Article
  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the wake of China’s enormous success transitioning to a market economy there is a widely held belief among researchers and policymakers that the country’s income distribution has become excessively unfair. Previous authors have argued ‘the perception of inequality is one of the key elements of the attitudes toward reforms’. We hypothesize that reform ‘winners’ (educated, high income, higher ranking Party officials) will express less dissatisfaction with the current income distribution and reform ‘losers’ (less educated, lower income, lower ranking Party members) will express greater dissatisfaction with the current income distribution. To test this hypothesis we use two unique data sets, the 2002 Chinese Household Income Project and the World Values Survey. We find that the perception of unfairness is highly correlated with actual or perceived income, current prospects, attitude toward corruption, and status of Party membership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Lee (2000) for an explanation for the dip in the Gini between 1995 and 2000.

  2. We consider the urban households only as they provide a more reliable measure of household income. We examine only the ‘inequality in the nation’ responses as the city responses are quite similar.

  3. See Appendix for a description of ordered logit.

  4. In Table 7 we compare CHIP results with WVS data, which lacks a subjective income variable. In this case education is statistically significant.

References

  • Alesina, A and Angeletos, G-M . 2005: Fairness and redistribution. The American Economic Review 95 (4): 960–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP). 2002: ICPSR21741-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2009-08-14. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR21741.v1.

  • Greene, W . 2012: Econometric analysis, 7th Edition. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfeld, I and Senik, C . 2010: The emerging aversion to inequality: Evidence from subjective data. Economics of Transition 18 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, C and Whyte, MK . 2008: Popular attitudes toward distributive justice: Beijing and Warsaw compared. Journal of Chinese Political Science 13 (1): 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, C and Whyte, MK . 2009: The social contours of distributive injustice feelings in contemporary China. In: Davis, DS and Wang, F (eds) Creating Wealth and Poverty in Post-Socialist China. Stanford University Press: Palo Alto, CA. pp., 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J . 2005: People’s Daily (Renmin Ribao), 27 June.

  • Knight, J, Song, L and Gunaatilaka, R . 2009: Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review 20 (4): 635–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, HY . 2000: Xiagang, the Chinese style of laying off workers. Asian Survey 40 (6): 914–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2000: Chinese Urban Household Survey, Beijing, China.

  • Riskin, C, Zhao, R and Li, S . 2002: China’s retreat from equality: Income distribution and economic transition. New York: Studies of the East Asian Institute, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey, P and Teksoz, U . 2007: Does transition make you happy? Economics of Transition 15 (4): 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. 2012: China|Data|Economic Indicators. The World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/country/china, accessed 23 February.

  • The Xinhua News Agency. 2005: Widening income gap, the most serious social problem in China. People’s Daily Online. 9 July, http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200507/09/eng20050709_195106.html, accessed 23 Feburary 2012.

  • Wang, F and Davis, DS . 2008: Creating wealth and poverty in postsocialist china. Stanford University Press: Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, M . 2010: Fair versus unfair: How do Chinese citizens view current inequalities? In: Oi, J, Rozelle, S and Zhou, X (eds) Growing Pains: Tensions and Opportunity in China’sTransformation. Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center: Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Values Study Group. 2008: World values survey, 1995–2008. ICPSR: Ann Arbor, MI.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Ordered logit specifications used in this paper

In this paper, we adopt a parsimonious logit specification and all the slope parameters are the same for different outcomes while each level of outcome is allowed to have a different intercept term. Suppose the unconditional probability of each outcome is denoted as p k =Prob(outcome=k), k=1, 2, 3, then the logit specification is given by the following:

This specification assumes proportional odds, as the odds ratio of the outcome Yk is independent of the category k. The odds ratio is assumed to be constant for all categories.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, J., Liu, H. & Qu, Z. Individual Perceptions of Distributional Fairness in China. Comp Econ Stud 56, 25–41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2013.27

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2013.27

Keywords

Navigation