Skip to main content
Log in

Information Sharing in Credit Markets: Incentives for Incorrect Information Reporting

  • Symposium Paper
  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of institutions of credit information sharing – private credit bureaus and public credit registries – in the market for bank loans represents a possible solution of the information asymmetry problem which most creditors face. However, the possibility of information sharing influences the bank's incentives in two different ways. While it disciplines the borrowers, and therefore reduces the share of bad loans, a bank loses a competitive advantage, the monopolistic knowledge about the data in its clients' credit histories. Does the bank have an opportunity to use the benefits of information sharing without losing its competitive advantage and its clientele? One way to do so is to report false data on borrowers. In this paper, we analyse the bank's incentives to misreport given the bank cannot refuse to participate in the information sharing system, as membership is obligatory. Our main result is that the opportunity to get extra profit and to offer less-expensive credit to new clients explain why banks may prefer a strategy of dishonest behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The case of public credit registry is not the only example of obligatory information sharing. There is no credit registry in Russia, for example, but according to Russian legislation each bank must report the information on its borrowers at least to one private credit bureau.

  2. Positive or negative, depending on the external regulator's requirements.

  3. Analysed in Padilla and Pagano (1999).

  4. Derived by putting (13) or (14) into the corresponding modification of (4), equal to zero.

  5. The chains are constructed just to make the logic clearer; in our set-up banks make the offers one by one, but cannot observe the offers of competitors and adjust their own ones using this information.

  6. Analysed in Padilla and Pagano (1999).

  7. Because of the symmetry, the results for dishonest bank B will be the same, accurate to the proportion of borrowers who chose the bank in the first period, other things equal.

  8. Extracted by putting (38), (39), (42) or (43) into (32).

  9. ‘Unlocking Credit. The Quest for Deep and Stable Bank Lending’, The 2005 Report on Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, Inter-American Development Bank, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, Chapter 13.

  10. According to ‘Unlocking Credit. The Quest for Deep and Stable Bank Lending’, The 2005 Report on Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, Inter-American Development Bank.

  11. For more details on credit reporting systems in Latin America see Luna, 2001, Luoto et al., 2004.

  12. The confirmation of this idea may be found in the release of the speech of chief national bank regulator, Comptroller of the Currency John D. Hawke, Jr.: ‘…borrowers may be rudely surprised when they discover that their good credit history as a subprime borrower isn't reflected in their credit files when they seek credit in the future and that they are unable to obtain better rates based on their good credit record’.

  13. Including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) amendments introduced in 1996 and the enactment of Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACT Act) in December 2003 among other things aimed to enhance the accuracy of information in credit reports.

  14. Gazeta.ru, August, 2005.

References

  • Akerlof, GA . 1970: The market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S . 2005: Fixing errors in credit report is no small task. USA Today, (www.usatoday.com).

  • Cassady, A and Mierzwinski, E . 2004: Mistakes do happen: A look at errors in consumer credit reports. National Association of State PIRGs, June 2004.

  • Comptroller Urges Industry to End Abusive Practices And Elevate Customer Service Standards, release of the speech by Comptroller of the Currency John D. Hawke, Jr, San-Francisco, (httpwww.occ.treas.gov/ftp/release/99-51.txt). 1999.

  • Jappelli, T and Pagano, M . 1993: Information sharing in credit markets. The Journal of Finance 48 (5): 1693–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jappelli, T and Pagano, M . 1999: Information sharing, lending and defaults: cross-country evidence CSEF Working Paper No 22.

  • Jappelli, T and Pagano, M . 2000a: Information sharing in credit markets: the European experience CSEF Working Paper No 22.

  • Jappelli, T and Pagano, M . 2000b: Information sharing in credit markets: A survey CSEF Working Paper No 36, March 2000.

  • Luna, SA . 2001: Case studies of selected credit bureaus in several Latin American countries. J.E. Austin Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoto, J, McIntosh, C and Wydick, B . 2004: Credit information systems in less-developed countries: Recent history and a test Mimeo, UC Berkeley.

  • Olegario, R . 2000: Credit-reporting agencies: their historical roots, current status, and role in market development Mimeo, University of Michigan Business School.

  • Padilla, AJ and Pagano, M . 1997: Endogenous communication among lenders and entrepreneurial incentives. The Review of Financial Studies 10 (1): 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, AJ and Pagano, M . 1999: Sharing default information as a borrower discipline device CSEF Working Paper. No 21.

  • POCCNRHe He BepRT KpeSNTHbIM dipo, Gazeta.ru, (2005).

  • Stiglitz, JE and Weiss, A . 1981: Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review 71 (3): 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unlocking Credit. The Quest for Deep and Stable Bank Lending. The 2005 report on economic and social progress in Latin America, Inter-American Development Bank, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, Ch.13.

  • Vercammen, JA . 1995: Credit bureau policy and sustainable reputation effects in credit markets. Economica, New Series, 62 (248): 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Hans Degryse and all participants at the Conference on ‘Risk, Regulation and Competition: Banking in Transition Economies’, 1–2 September 2006, Ghent, Belgium, for comments on a previous version of this paper. I am grateful to anonymous referees for recommendations on how to improve the paper. I am especially indebted to David Kemme for editing the paper and to Maria Yudkevich and Koen Schoors for helpful advice and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semenova, M. Information Sharing in Credit Markets: Incentives for Incorrect Information Reporting. Comp Econ Stud 50, 381–415 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2008.10

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2008.10

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation