This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
My thanks go to Jonathan Davies for organizing the roundtable on Mark Bevir's Democratic Governance at the Critical Governance Conference, University of Warwick, 13–14 December 2010.
For an in-depth analysis of this work, see the special issue of Intellectual History Review, ‘Post-Analytic Hermeneutics: Themes from Mark Bevir's Philosophy of History’, 21(1) (2011).
For their various responses to critics, see Bevir (2006); Bevir and Rhodes (2006a); Bevir and Rhodes (2006b); Bevir and Rhodes (2008a); Bevir and Rhodes (2008b). And alternatively, a systematic argument in favour of the continued relevance of the state-centric approach to governance is provided by Bell and Hindmoor (2009).
This critical contrast between political irrationality and scientific rationality is also found in broad critiques of the social sciences’ common cause with the modern state and the goal of a science of policy making; see, for example, Fay (1975) and Wolin (1961).
For a defence of aspects of institutionalism, see McAnulla (2007).
Elsewhere, in The Logic of the History of Ideas, Bevir states that sociology might contribute to the study of how traditions develop and decline, postulating that ‘open traditions, which recognize our capacity for agency and actively encourage innovation, are likely to develop more rapidly than those that do not do so’ (Bevir, 1999, p. 317).
For an overview, see Schatzki et al (2001).
Bourdieu's example is of a tennis player who, in response to rapid movements of the ball, positions himself instinctively on the court without making rational calculations regarding the alternatives (Bourdieu, 1998).
For a strident critique of Beck's claim that methodological nationalism is endemic in social theory, see Chernilo (2007).
See also the alternative edition (Bourdieu, 1999).
Bale (2006) argues that the influence of new institutionalists on New Labour policy is far less clear than argued by Bevir.
References
Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Bale, T. (2006) All poke and no soak?’: Interpreting the Labour Party. History of the Human Sciences 19 (1): 101–106.
Beck, U. (2007) Cosmopolitanism: A critical theory for the twenty-first century. In: G. Ritzer (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Globalization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 162–176.
Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. (2009) Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Bevir, M. (1999) Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bevir, M. (2006) Social democracy and social science: Author's reply. History of the Human Sciences 19 (1): 113–120.
Bevir, M. (2010) Democratic Governance. Princeton, NJ; Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R. (2001) Interpretive Theory. In: D. Marsh & G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 131–152.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003) Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2006a) Defending interpretation. European Political Science 5 (1): 69–83.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2006b) Disaggregating structures as an agenda for critical realism: A reply to McAnulla. British Politics 1 (3): 397–403.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2006c) Governance Stories. London: Routledge.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2008a) Authors’ response: Politics as cultural practice. Political Studies Review 6 (2): 170–177.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2008b) The differentiated polity as narrative. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 10 (4): 729–734.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1999) Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. In: G. Steinmetz (ed.) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, pp. 53–75.
Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Cameron, D. (2010) Big society speech. Liverpool 19 July, http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/07/big-society-speech-53572, accessed 10 March 2011.
Chernilo, D. (2007) A Social Theory of the Nation-State: The Political Forms of Modernity Beyond Methodological Nationalism. London and New York: Routledge.
Day, G. and Thompson, A. (2004) Theorizing Nationalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Fay, B. (1975) Social Theory and Political Practice. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Finlayson, A., Bevir, M., Rhodes, R.A.W., Dowding, K. and Hay, C. (2004) The interpretive approach to political science: A symposium. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6 (2): 129–164.
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. (2008) Structure, agency and power in political analysis: Beyond contextualised self-interpretations. Political Studies Review 6 (2): 155–169.
Held, D. and McGrew, A. (2007) Globalization/Anti-Globalization: Beyond the Great Divide. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Marsh, D. (2008a) Understanding British government: Analysing competing models. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 10 (2): 251–268.
Marsh, D. (2008b) What is at stake? A response to Bevir and Rhodes. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 10 (4): 735–739.
McAnulla, S. (2006a) Challenging the new interpretivist approach: Towards a critical realist alternative. British Politics 1 (1): 113–138.
McAnulla, S. (2006b) Critical realism, social structure and political analysis: A reply to Bevir and Rhodes. British Politics 1 (3): 404–412.
McAnulla, S. (2007) New labour, old epistemology? Reflections on political science, new institutionalism and The Blair Government. Parliamentary Affairs 60 (2): 313–331.
Richards, I.A. (1936) The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roshwald, A. (2006) The Endurance of Nationalism: Ancient Roots and Modern Dilemmas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds.) (2001) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
Smith, M. (2008) Re-centring British government: Beliefs, traditions and dilemmas in political science. Political Studies Review 6 (2): 143–154.
Thornhill, C. (2010) Legality, legitimacy and the constitution: A historical-functionalist approach. In: C. Thornhill and S. Ashenden (eds.) Legality and Legitimacy: Normative and Sociological Approaches.. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, pp. 29–56.
Wolin, S.S. (1961) Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turnbull, N. Interpretivism and practice in governance studies: The critique of methodological institutionalism. Br Polit 6, 252–264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2011.8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2011.8