Skip to main content
Log in

Imagining the Truth. Discussion of Prince's “The Self in Pain: The Paradox of Memory. The Paradox of Testimony”

  • Special Section
  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The discussion highlights the significant role played by imagination in representing the horrors that resist representation. It is Dr. Tylim's position that imagination assists patient and analyst in overcoming the limitations of memory. Imagination is the gateway to truth. In working with survivors, the therapeutic encounter may become a stage where unspeakable experiences attain presence in their absence. The silence or the gaps are then the victim's testimony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Moises Kaufman's play Gross Indecency. The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde is another example of documentary theater.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1999). Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive, D. Heller-Roazen (Trans.). New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (2007). The political aesthetics of Holocaust literature: Peter Weiss and its critics. History and Memory, 10 (2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, R. (2003). Critica y Sospecha. Buenos Aires: Paidos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, S. (2007). When the third is dead: Memory, mourning and witnessing in the aftermath of the Holocaust. Unpublished paper.

  • Green, A. (1986). On private madness. Madison: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. (1999). Gross indecency. The three trials of Oscar Wilde. New York: Dramatis Play Service Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, L.L. (1991). Holocaust Testimonies. The Ruins of Memort. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinar, M. (2003). Subjectivity under extreme conditions. In J.A. Cancelmo, I. Tylim, J. Hoffenberg & H. Myers (Eds.), Terrorism and the psychoanalytic space: Perspectives from ground zero. New York: Pace University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. (1998a). Marat-Sade (Vol. 92, pp. 41–116). New York: The German Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. (1998b). The Investigation (Vol. 92, pp. 117–298). New York: The German Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel, E. (1990). From the kingdom of memory. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Tylim.

Additional information

This paper was first presented as the inaugural colloquium of the Specialization Training in Trauma and Disaster Studies of the New York University Post Doctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy on January 25, 2008 and again as part of a panel at the Division 39 Convention “Viva Psychoanalysis” in San Antonio, Texas on April 25, 2009.

1Psy.D., ABPP, Faculty, New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Faculty, Institute for Psychoanalytic Training and Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tylim, I. Imagining the Truth. Discussion of Prince's “The Self in Pain: The Paradox of Memory. The Paradox of Testimony”. Am J Psychoanal 69, 304–310 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2009.22

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2009.22

Keywords

Navigation