Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational level and friendship expectation at work

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on interpersonal interactions/relationships in work organizations indicates that personnel at higher organizational levels are more sociable and yet have workplace impersonality. This study unravels previous inconsistencies by examining employees’ friendship expectations across organizational levels. Data were collected from 222 full-time employees with a variety of occupational backgrounds in Taiwan. The results indicated that expectations of instrumental friendship at work did not differ across organizational levels. However, higher-level employees had lower expectations of expressive friendship at work, which provides personal emotional satisfaction, while detracting from workplace competitive advantage. The findings of this study shed new light on previous inconsistencies and the mutually contradictory organizational stances on workplace friendship. Significant implications are provided for dilemmas concerning isolated offices, ‘management by walking around’ and workplace relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. and Balfour, D. (1998) Unmasking Administrative Evil. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, S. (2007) Friendship and work: A good or bad partnership? USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2007-08-01-work-friends_N.htm, accessed 7 August 2007.

  • Armstrong, S.J. and Overton, T.S. (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Wyatt, T. and Stone, R. (1996) Early career outcomes of graduate employees: The effect of mentoring and ingratiation. Journal of Management Studies 33 (1): 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. and Crant, J.M. (2000) Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science 11 (6): 648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. (1981) Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership, Revised edn. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T.M., Lee, C. and Hui, C. (2006) Organizational level as a moderator of the relationship between justice perceptions and work-related reactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (6): 705–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R.A., Roloff, M.E., Camp, K.V. and Karol, S.H. (1990) Is it lonely at the top? Career success and personal relationships. Journal of Communication 40 (1): 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E.M., West, J.P. and Richter, M.N. (2002) Workplace relationships: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review 62 (2): 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernikow, L. (1986) Lonely in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, K. and Baxter, L.A. (1992) Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication 56 (Summer): 200–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusman, M. (2007) Human relationships at work: The untapped frontier. Working Resources. http://www.workingresources.com/professionaleffectivenessarticles/article.nhtml?uid=10062, accessed 5 September 2007.

  • Carroll, G.R. and Teo, A.C. (1996) On the social networks of managers. Academy of Management Review 39 (2): 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadsey, J. and Beyer, S. (2001) Social relationships in the workplace. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 7 (2): 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, S.M. and Wagner, J.A. (1994) Percept-percept inflation in micro-organizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (1): 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, W.B., Giuliano, T. and Archer, R.L. (1983) Lonely at the top: The effect of power on information flow in the dyad. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9 (4): 629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J.H. (1997) Men's and women's organizational peer relationships: A comparison. Journal of Business Communication 34 (1): 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J.B., Marler, L.E. and Hester, K. (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (8): 1089–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guld, M. (2007) Recruitment: Number two priority. Receivables Report for America's Health Care Financial Managers 22 (11): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, D., Robert, C. and Rose, A. (2011) Co-rumination in the workplace: Adjustment trade-offs for men and women who engage in excessive discussions of workplace problems. Journal of Business & Psychology 26 (1): 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.B. (2007) Management: Experience speaks. Paper, File and Foil Converter 81 (1): 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, A.P. (1976) Handbook of Small Group Research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S.E. and Slocum, J.W. (1999) Management, 8th edn. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C.M. (1998) How your employee communications programs can boost productivity and pride. Public Relations Quarterly 43 (3): 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.H., Cunningham, D.A. and Rechnitzer, P.A. (1977) Work patterns associated with type-A behavior: A managerial population. Human Relations 30 (9): 825–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review 18 (1): 58–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1995) Race, opportunity and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal 38 (3): 673–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. and Hunter, M. (2007) How leaders create and use networks. Harvard Business Review 85 (1): 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1990) In praise of hierarchy. Harvard Business Review 68 (1): 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T.A. and Bretz, R.D. (1994) Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management 20 (1): 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, K.E. and Kendall, J.E. (1981) Observing organizational environments: A systematic approach for information analysts. MIS Quarterly 5 (1): 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N.L. and Seok, D.H. (2011) … with a little help from my friends: Friendship, effort norms and group motivation gain. Journal of Managerial Psychology 26 (3): 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. and Mueller, C.W. (1978) Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Vol. 14. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M.L. (1978) Non-verbal Communication in Human Interaction, 2nd edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1982) Social resources and instrumental action. In: P.V. Marsden and N. Lin (eds.) Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J.R. (1982) Inter- and inter-organizational networks. In: S.B. Bacharach (ed.) Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. and Konar, E. (1984) An investigation of sex differences in pay expectations and their possible causes. Academy of Management Journal 27 (4): 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, D., Devine, I. and Kausilas, D. (2000) Friendships of woman and men at work: Job satisfaction and resource implications. Journal of Managerial Psychology 15 (2): 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P.V. (1988) Homogeneity in confiding relations. Journal of Social Networks 10 (1): 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1990) Structural determinants of men's and women's personal networks. American Sociological Review 55 (October): 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R.L. (2009) Are women tending and befriending in the workplace? Gender differences in the relationship between workplace friendships and organizational outcomes. Sex Roles 60 (1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R.L. and Wright, S.L. (2009) Friends and Enemies in Organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parise, S. and Rollag, K. (2010) Emergent network structure and initial group performance: The moderating role of pre-existing relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31 (6): 877–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and Austin, N. (1985) MBWA (Managing by walking around). California Management Review 28 (1): 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pile, J. (1978) Open Office Planning. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986) Self-report problems in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4): 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, K. and Bell, R.A. (1991) Relationships among loneliness, communication competence and career success in a state bureaucracy: A field study of the ‘lonely at the top’ maxim. Communication Quarterly 39 (4): 358–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, L.E. and Mitchell, T.R. (1973) Structural determinants of individual behavior in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 18 (1): 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal, R. and King, W.R. (1995) An empirical taxonomy of the decision-making processes concerning strategic application of information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (4): 177–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapadin, L.A. (1988) Friendship and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 5 (4): 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sias, P.M. and Cahill, D.J. (1998) From co-workers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication 62 (3): 273–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sias, P.M. and Perry, T. (2004) Disengaging from workplace relationships. Human Communication Research 30 (4): 589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sias, P.M., Smith, G. and Avdeyeva, T. (2003) Sex and sex-composition differences and similarities in peer workplace friendship development. Communication Studies 54 (3): 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, S.H. (2006) Workplace friendship and employees’ productivity: LMX theory and the case of the Seoul city government. International Review of Public Administration 11 (1): 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N.A., Ashleigh, M.J., Roberts, A.D. and Xu, F. (2003) Virtuality in human supervisory control: Assessing the effects of psychological and social remoteness. Ergonomics 46 (12): 1215–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tachibanaki, T. (1987) The determination of the promotion process in organizations and of earnings differentials. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 8 (4): 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J. (2010) The influence of position and gender on personal networks in a UK professional service. Industrial Marketing Management 39 (3): 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, H.H.M. and Dasborough, M.T. (2008) A study of exchange and emotions in team member relationships. Group and Organization Management 33 (2): 194–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S.S., DeSanctics, G. and Staudenmayer, N. (2007) The relationship between task interdependency and role stress: A revisit of the job demands-control model. Journal of Management Studies 44 (2): 284–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank three anonymous reviewers and John Billingsley for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Trade, College of Business, Chinese Culture University, 55, Hwa-Kang Road, Yang-Ming-Shan, 11114, Taipei, Taiwan

    Hsiao-Yen Mao

  2. PhD Programme, College of Management, Da Yeh University, 168, University Road, Dacun, 51591, Changhua, Taiwan

    An-Tien Hsieh

Authors
  1. Hsiao-Yen Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. An-Tien Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, HY., Hsieh, AT. Organizational level and friendship expectation at work. Asian Bus Manage 11, 485–506 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2012.14

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2012.14

Keywords

Search

Navigation