Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of enablers of knowledge creation in Japan and US-based firms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports the results of a study of knowledge creation systems in Japanese and American firms in Japan and the United States. The research was performed inside automotive and information appliance firms with primarily managerial employees from functional areas outside production. Through field interviews, a model was constructed of factors that drive successful knowledge creation, and a subsequent survey compared the use of these factors and their perceived utility among Japan-based and US-based respondents in these two knowledge-intensive industries. Our results show there is broad agreement regarding which practices help create knowledge, but they also suggest that Japan-based firms excel at implementing a distinctive, integrated system of organisational practices that promote organisational learning and stimulate knowledge creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A problem-solving methodology utilised in Japan that examines situations through three stages of investigation: (a) What is the actual scene? (b) What is our actual understanding? (c) What is reality?

References

  • Argote, L. (1999) Organisational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (2002) Building competitive advantage through people. Sloan Management Review 43 (2): 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998) Working Knowledge: How Organisations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2007) Innovation: Transforming the Way Business Creates. London: Economist.

  • Enkel, E., Gibbert, M., Makarevitch, A. and Vassiliadis, S. (2002) Innovation/Knowledge Creation, Customer Integration and Entering New Ventures. University of St. Gallen. Institute of Management Discussion Paper 44.

  • Garvin, D.A. (1993) Building learning organisations. Harvard Business Review 71 (4): 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg von, K., Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innovation 25. (2007) Creating the future, challenging unlimited possibilities. Japanese government interim report, http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/innovation/interim_e.html, accessed 4 October 2010.

  • Ito, K. (1999) Kigyo-Kachi o Keiei Suru, (Management of Corporate Value) Tokyo: Toyo Keizai, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K. (2000) Koporeito Varyu, (Management of Corporate Brand) Tokyo: Nihon Keizai, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrar, Y. (2002) Knowledge management: Learning for organisational experience. Managerial Auditing Journal 17 (6): 322–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. and Nielsen, P. (2007) Knowledge management and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower 28 (3/4): 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. (2003) The New Knowledge Management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merx-Chermin, M. and Nijhof, W. (2005) Factors influencing knowledge creation and innovation in an organisation. Journal of European Industrial Training 29 (2/3): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (ed.) (2005) Knowledge Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Hirata, T. (2008) Managing Flow: A Process Theory of the Knowledge-based Firm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P. and Finkelstein, S. (1996) Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review 74 (2): 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P. and Finkelstein, S. (2004) Leveraging intellect. Academy of Management Executive 10 (3): 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. London: Century Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soo, C.W., Devinney, T.M. and Midgley, D.F. (2007) External knowledge acquisition, creativity and learning in organisational problem-solving. International Journal of Technology Management 38 (1/2): 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, H., Osono, E. and Shimizu, N. (2008) The contradictions that drive Toyota's success. Harvard Business Review 86 (6): 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueki, H. and Ueki, M. (2008) Dainamiku na Ba ga Chi o Sozo suru (Dynamic Ba enables knowledge creation). In: Japan Society of Knowledge Management (ed.) Kata to Ba no Manejimento, (Management of Style and Ba) Tokyo: Kanki Shuppan, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueki, H., Ueki, M., Saito, T. and Miyashita, K. (2007) Nichibei-jidosha-kigyo niokeru narejji-manejimento (Knowledge creation in Japan – U.S. automobile firms). Annual Bulletin of Japan Academy of International Business Studies 13: 83–95, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. (1998) A new mandate for human resources. Harvard Business Review 76 (1): 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, N. and Kase, R. (2007) The role of HR actors in knowledge networks. International Journal of Manpower 28 (3/4): 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was awarded a grant for scientific research by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science during 2004–2008 (Rep. Prof. Ueki). We appreciate the assistance of all the relevant corporate people who have kindly co-operated in this study, and comments from scholars such as Prof. T. Saito, Prof. K. Miyashita and Prof. F. Tuggle. The authors are also grateful to the referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideo Ueki.

Appendix

Appendix

Enablers of knowledge creation

Environment and strategy

Pursue organisational changes Ensure shared management philosophy and vision Share knowledge Enhance brand value Attach importance to customer satisfaction Participate in strategic alliances

Information sharing

Implement Balanced Scorecard Practice strong top-management leadership Pursue systematisation of operating processes Develop two-way information sharing inside the organisation Develop two-way information sharing between organisations Attach importance to three actual principlesFootnote 1 Use communication tools (eg, knowledge portal) Share best practices Tolerate failures and then share experience Practice Frequently Asked Questions Commend sharing information and creating knowledge Organisational unit supporting knowledge creation

Corporate culture, learning and structure

Do cross-functional projects Make organisation flat Promote delegation of authority Attach importance to employee-challenging initiatives Use Total Quality Management (TQM)

Personnel training

Provide cross-functional and cross-organisational training Encourage long length of service Support system for career development Implement HRM based on competency model Use job rotation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ueki, H., Ueki, M., Linowes, R. et al. A comparative study of enablers of knowledge creation in Japan and US-based firms. Asian Bus Manage 10, 113–132 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2010.33

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2010.33

Keywords

Navigation