Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multi-scale approach of public space networks in the scattered city

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scattered metropolitan cities are characterized by new urban realities that offer a variety of typologies and services – new centrality areas – that function as cores of attraction, but show a lack of integration between local and wider territorial scales, triggering problems of fragmentation and polarization. In addition, public space is often reduced to its minimal and infrastructural function, ensuring critical connections but lacking design qualities. In this article we will try to understand how it is possible to articulate these multi-scale centralities with local urban fabrics, focusing on the role of public space. We will analyse, within the scope of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, the South Bank, and in more detail, a number of areas of the Almada municipality developing an analysis methodology for identifying problems and opportunities. The hypothesis we place is that public space, in a systemic and multi-scale perspective, as ‘the connecting element’, can link different territorial scales, forming a coherent structure and acting as a reference for scattered urban contexts. We discuss how public spaces as multi-scale connectors can work as binding elements, proposing some design actions and strategies to tackle these urban problems, contributing for the urban design practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The original scale of the cartographic imagery corresponds to the usual representation of 1:25.000.

  2. Lisbon Metropolitan Area Regional Plan, PROTAML, 2009.

References

  • Ajuntament de Barcelona. (1987) Areas de nova centralitat=New downtowns in Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain: Ajuntament de Barcelona.

  • Amendola, G. (1997) La città postmoderna. Rome, Italy: Laterza & Figli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antunes Ferreira, J., Condessa, B, Castro e Almeida, J. and Pinto, P. (2010) Urban settlements delimitation in low-density areas: An application to the municipality of Tomar (Portugal). Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (3): 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, F. (1995) Metapolis ou l’avenir des villes. Paris, France: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanfy, L. (1968 [1976]) General System theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, revised edn. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja, J. and Muxi, Z. (2003) El Espacio Público: Ciudad y Ciudadanía. Barcelona, Spain: Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, P. (2008) O software, o espaço público. In: AAVV. Manual de Metodologia e Boas Práticas para a Elaboração de um Plano de Mobilidade Sustentável. Moita: Câmaras Municipais da Moita, Barreiro e Loures e Transitec Portugal, pp. 89-96.

  • Brandão, P., Carrelo, M. and Águas, S. (2002) O Chão da Cidade – Guia de Avaliação do Design de espaço público. Lisboa, Portugal: Centro Português de Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, A. and Brandão, P. (2012) Do industrial ao pós-industrial: Transição e diversidade urbana – LX/BCN, On the w@terfront (22): 105–121, http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Waterfront/article/view/252059.

  • Buchanan, P. (1988) What city? A plea for place in the public realm. Architectural Review 184 (1101): 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Câmara Municipal de Almada. (2007) Estudo Estratégico de Almada Poente. Almada, Portugal: CM Almada.

  • Cambra, P. (2012) Pedestrian accessibility and attractiveness indicators for walkability assessment. Master thesis, Technical Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon https://fenix.ist.utl.pt/publico/showDegreeTheses.do;jsessionid=F46D33D677673241148D0C144E0582E5.as3?method=showThesisDetails&degreeID=null&thesisID=345845&contentContextPath_PATH=/cursos/muot/dissertacoes&_request_checksum_=6953ccc93b37ddeb88c674ee725edf2d60f80d62.

  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003) Public Places – Urban Spaces: The Dimension of Urban Design. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., Magalhães, C. and Hammond, L. (2008) Public Space, The Management Dimension. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2010) Contemporary public space, part two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design 15 (2): 157–173, doi: 10.1080/13574801003638111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, C. and Tiwari, R. (2008) Transitioning urban arterial roads to activity corridors. Urban Design International 13 (2): 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeucht, R. and Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2010) Planning Urban sidewalks: Infrastructure, daily life and destinations. Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESPON. (2005) ESPON 1.1.1 potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Stockholm: Nordregio, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/ThematicProjects/Polycentricity/fr-1.1.1_revised-full.pdf.

  • Friedman, Y. (2006) Pro Domo. Barcelona, Spain: Actar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, J. (1991) Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. and Gemozoe, L. (2001) New City Spaces. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, D. and Maitland, R.B. (1984) Concepts of Urban Design. London: Academy Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. and Reijndorp, A. (2001) In Search of New Public Domain. Retterdam, The Netherlands: NAI Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. M. and Page, S. J. (1999) The Geography of Tourism and Recreation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2008) Towards shared space. Urban Design International 13 (2): 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1974) La production de l’Espace. Paris, France: Edition Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukez, P. (2007) Suburban Transformations. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandanipour, A., Cars, G. and Allen, J. eds. (1998) Social Exclusion in European Cities: Processes, Experiences and Responses. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. and Remesar, A. (2012) Public space networks as a support for urban diversity. Open House International 37 (2): 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J., Remesar, A., Brandão, P. and Nunes da Silva, F. (2010) Towards urban cohesion: Planning public space networks. In: 46th ISOCARP International Congress. Nairobi: Internacional Society of City and Regional Planners. http://www.isocarp.net/data/case_studies/1798.pdf.

  • Portas, N. (1999) Espacio público y ciudad emergente. In: A.A.V.V. (ed.) La arquitectura del espacio público. Formas del pasado, formas del presente. Milan, Italy: Junta de Andalucia and Triennale di Milano, pp. 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portas, N., Domingues, A. and Cabral, J. (2011) Políticas urbanas II – Transformação, Regulação e projectos. Lisboa, Portugal: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P. and Latora, V. (2008) Multiple centrality assessment in Parma: A network analysis of paths and open spaces. Urban Design International 13 (1): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piorr, A., Ravetz, J. and Tosics, I (2010) Peri-urbanisation in Europe: Towards European Policies to Sustain Urban-Rural Futures – A Synthesis Report. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen/Academic Books Life Sciences, http://www.plurel.net/images/Peri_Urbanisation_in_Europe_printversion.pdf.

  • Project for Public Spaces. (2000) How to Turn a Place Around. New York: Project for Public Spaces.

  • PROTAML. (2009) PROTAML: Diagnóstico Sectorial Sistema Urbano. Habitação e Equipamentos. Lisboa: CCDRLVT, http://www.ccdr-lvt.pt/content/index.php?action=detailfo&rec=54.

  • Remesar, A. (2007) Public space is not dead. On the Waterfront (10): 5–6http://www.raco.cat/index.php/Waterfront/article/view/218359/29745.

  • Roberts, M, Lloyd-Jones, T and Nice, S (1999) Place and space in the networked city: Conceptualizing the integrated metropolis. Journal of Urban Design 4 (1): 51–66. doi: 10.1080/13574809908724438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (2000) Postmetropolis. Massachussetts: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, M. (1992) Variations on the Theme Park. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. and Owens, P. M. (1993) The evolving metropolis: Studies of community, neighborhood, and street form at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (3): 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vall-Casas, P., Koschinsky, J. and Mendoza, C. (2011) Retrofitting suburbia through pre-urban patterns: Introducing a European perspective. Urban Design International 16 (3): 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1963) Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In: L. Wingo (ed.) Cities and Space: The Future use of Urban Land. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 23–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Almada Municipality for the information and cartographic bases, of Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under the PhD grant SFRH / BD / 62640 / 2009 and PhD grant SFRH / BD / 69911 / 2010, and to the funding of the projects HAR2009-13989-C02-01 (Spanish Government) and 2009SGR0903 (Catalan Government).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CR POLIS, Universitat de Barcelona, CESUR, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av Rovisco Pais, 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal

    Ana Júlia Pinto & Ana Luísa Brandão

Authors
  1. Ana Júlia Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Luísa Brandão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Júlia Pinto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinto, A., Brandão, A. A multi-scale approach of public space networks in the scattered city. Urban Des Int 20, 175–194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.4

Keywords

Search

Navigation