Abstract
Experimental methods are on the rise in Political Science, and we have a growing demand for teaching experimental methods within university courses. This article is an update on an article published in European Political Science (EPS) in 2012 titled ‘Teaching Experimental Political Science’. It presents an alternative teaching concept, where experiments are not just experienced but also designed by students. Consequently, this article argues that teaching experimental methods in Political Science should include students working on their own research projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adriaensen, J., Coremans, E., and Kerremans, B. (2014) ‘Overcoming statistics anxiety. Towards the incorporation of quantitative methods in non-methodological courses’, European Political Science 13(3): 251–265.
Adriaensen, J., Kerremans, B., and Slootmaeckers, K. (2015) ‘Editors’ introduction to the thematic issue: Mad about methods? Teaching research methods in political science’, Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 1–10.
Blair, A., Curtis, S., and McGinty, S. (2013a) ‘Is peer feedback an effective approach for creating dialogue in politics?’, European Political Science 12(1): 86–101.
Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M. and Shields, S. (2013b) ‘What Feedback do students want?’, Politics 33(1): 66–79.
Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J. and Lupia, A. (2011) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J. and Lupia, A. (2006) ‘The growth and development of experimental research in political science’, American Political Science Review 100(4): 627–635.
Dunning, T. (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., Marshall, S. (2009) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Enhancing Academic Practice, London: Routledge.
Hamenstädt, U. (2012a) ‘Teaching experimental political science: Experiences from a seminar on methods’, European Political Science 11(1): 114–127.
Hamenstädt, U. (2012b) Die Logik des politikwissenschaftlichen Experiments, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Holt, C. and Laury, S (1997) ‘Classroom games: Voluntary provision of a public good’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 209–215.
Morton, R. and Williams, K. (2010) Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. From Nature to the Lab, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nikolopoulos, I. and Zettl, C. (2014) ‘Research as a teen: First-year obligatory undergraduate research programme in political science’, ECPR General Conference 2014, Glasgow.
Page, E. (2015) ‘Undergraduate research: An apprenticeship approach to teaching political science methods’, European Political Science 14(3): 340–354.
Ryan, M., Saunders, C., Rainsford E. and Thompson E. (2013) ‘Improving research methods teaching and learning in politics and international relations: A ‘Reality Show’ approach’, Politics 34(1): 85–97.
Shadish, W., Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (2002) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Touchton, M. (2015) ‘Flipping the classroom and student performance in advanced statistics. Evidence from a quasi-experiment’, Special issue: Teaching research methods in political science, Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 28–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supplementary information accompanies this article on the European Political Science website (www.palgrave-journals.com/eps)
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamenstädt, U. teaching experimental political science: reloaded. Eur Polit Sci 17, 486–493 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0117-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0117-8