Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 123–152 | Cite as

Language friction and partner selection in cross-border R&D alliance formation

  • Amol M JoshiEmail author
  • Nandini Lahiri
Article

Abstract

How does language friction affect alliance formation? Language friction is a form of cultural friction arising from structural differences in the respective languages used by potential partners to reason and solve problems together. A little language friction may prompt partners to rethink solutions, thereby enhancing collaboration, but excessive friction may impede collaboration. We develop a Language Friction Index (LFI) to quantify relative differences in linguistic structure for any language pair. Utilizing a unique data set of semiconductor design activities (1988–2001), our empirical analysis finds an inverted U-shaped relationship between partners’ LFI and the likelihood of cross-border research and development (R&D) alliance formation. This relationship is further moderated by prior ties and technological distance. Our findings have several important implications, including: (1) language differences are a measurable and discernible source of cultural friction; (2) the effects of language friction are economically significant and strategically consequential; (3) certain aspects of language friction occur independent of language proficiency and persist despite the use of lingua franca to reduce language barriers; (4) linguistic diversity is an indirect marker of cognitive diversity, which is useful in boosting creativity, especially in first-time collaborations; (5) beyond R&D alliances, language friction may also influence other types of strategic interactions and organizational processes.

Keywords

language friction alliances and joint ventures innovation and R&D linguistics cross-cultural research/measurement issues 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has benefited from data support by the Global Semiconductor Alliance (GSA) and is funded in part by a grant from UNC’s CIBER. We thank seminar participants at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, three anonymous referees, and Area Editor Jaeyong Song for their insightful comments and helpful feedback. A previous version of this article was awarded Runner-Up for the 2012 AIB Best Conference Paper Prize.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Croson, R., & Mahoney, J. T. 2010. The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: An experimental investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (4): 413–437.Google Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G. 2000. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkermans, A. P. D., Harzing, A.-W., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2010. Cultural accommodation and language priming. Management International Review, 50 (5): 559–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8 (2): 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambos, T. C., & Ambos, B. 2009. The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 15 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. 1990. Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (4): 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. 2013. Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (2): 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Björkman, I. 2005. Surmounting interunit barriers factors associated with interunit communication intensity in the multinational corporation. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35 (1): 28–46.Google Scholar
  9. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beamish, P. W., & Banks, J. C. 1987. Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 18 (2): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bierly, III., P. E., & Gallagher, S. 2007. Explaining alliance partner selection: Fit, trust and strategic expediency. Long Range Planning, 40 (2): 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Björkman, A., & Piekkari, R. 2009. Language and foreign subsidiary control: An empirical test. Journal of International Management, 15 (1): 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloom, A. H. 1984. Caution – The words you use may affect what you say: A response to Au. Cognition, 17 (3): 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bloom, P., & Keil, F. C. 2001. Thinking through language. Mind & Language, 16 (4): 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boroditsky, L. 2010a. Lost in translation. The Wall Street Journal, 23 July, http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703467304575383131592767868.
  17. Boroditsky, L. 2010b. How the languages we speak shape the ways we think: The FAQs. In M. J. Spivey, K. McRae, L. Nadel, & M.F. Joanisse (Eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 615–632, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Boroditsky, L. 2011. How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304 (2): 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. 2003. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, 61–79, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bowerman, M. 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Goldin-Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds), Language and Space, 385–436, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Brannen, M. Y., & Doz, Y. L. 2012. Corporate languages and strategic agility: Trapped in your jargon or lost in translation? California Management Review, 54 (3): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Casasanto, D. 2008. Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58 (S1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106 (2): 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Casasola, M. 2005. Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants’ categorization of support spatial relations. Developmental Psychology, 41 (1): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, J., Sokal, R. R., & Ruhlen, M. 1995. Worldwide analysis of genetic and linguistic relationships of human populations. Human Biology, 67 (4): 595–612.Google Scholar
  27. Chen, M. K. 2013. The effect of language on economic behavior: Evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. The American Economic Review, 103 (2): 690–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Choi, S. 2006. Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment. First Language, 26 (2): 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41 (1): 83–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coff, R. W. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10 (2): 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Costa, A., Foucart, A., Arnon, I., Aparici, M., & Apesteguia, J. 2014. “Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition, 130 (2): 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Culpan, R., & Kucukemiroglu, O. 1993. A comparison of US and Japanese management styles and unit effectiveness. Management International Review, 33 (1): 27–43.Google Scholar
  34. Davidson, W. H. 1980. The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 11 (2): 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dewey, A., & de Geus, A. J. 1992. VHDL: toward a unified view of design. Design & Test of Computers, IEEE, 9 (2): 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diestre, L., & Rajagopalan, N. 2012. Are all ‘sharks’ dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 33 (10): 1115–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Drogendijk, R., & Zander, L. 2010. Walking the cultural distance: In search of direction beyond friction. In T. Devinney, P. Torben, & T. Laszlo (Eds), The Past, Present and Future of International Business & Management: Advances in International Management, Volume 23, 189–212, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. 2011. The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
  39. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 660–679.Google Scholar
  40. Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. 2001. Strategic alliances work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42 (4): 37–43.Google Scholar
  41. Evans, V. 2003. The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Feely, A. J., & Harzing, A.-W. 2003. Language management in multinational companies. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10 (2): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ferner, A., Almond, P., & Colling, T. 2005. Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: The case of ‘workforce diversity’ in US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. 2008. Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108 (3): 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fredriksson, R., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Piekkari, R. 2006. The multinational corporation as a multilingual organization: The notion of a common corporate language. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11 (4): 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Freyd, J. J., Pantzer, T. M., & Cheng, J. L. 1988. Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117 (4): 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gallistel, C. R. 2002. Language and spatial frames of reference in mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (8): 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83 (1): 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ghosh, A., & Rosenkopf, L. 2014. Shrouded in structure: Challenges and opportunities for a friction-based view of network research. Organization Science. published online 11 July. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0922.Google Scholar
  51. Gimeno, J. 2004. Competition within and between networks: The contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6): 820–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ginsburgh, V., & Weber, S. 2011. How many languages do we need? The economics of linguistic diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Gordon, P. 2004. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306 (5695): 496–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gordon, P. 2010. Worlds without words: Commensurability and causality in language, culture, and cognition. In B. C. Malt, & P. Wolff (Eds), Words and the mind, 199–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. 2011. Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1 (3–4): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gray, R. D., & Atkinson, Q. D. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature, 426 (6965): 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Greenberg, J. H. 1956. The measurement of linguistic diversity. Language, 32 (1): 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1): 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5): 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Hagel, J., & Brown, J. S. 2005. Productive friction: How difficult business partnerships can accelerate innovation. Harvard Business Review, 83 (2): 82–91.Google Scholar
  62. Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1): 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2005. Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1): 16–38.Google Scholar
  65. Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (S1): 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Harbison, J. R., & Pekar, P. 1997. Cross-border alliances in the age of collaboration. Los Angeles: Booz-Allen & Hamilton.Google Scholar
  67. Harzing, A.-W. 2003. The role of culture in entry-mode studies: From neglect to myopia? In J. L. C. Cheng, & M. A. Hitt (Eds), Managing Multinationals in a Knowledge Economy: Economics, Culture Advances in International Management, Volume 15, 75–127. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Harzing, A.-W., & Feely, A. J. 2008. The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15 (1): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Harzing, A.-W., & Pudelko, M. 2013. Language competencies, policies and practices in multinational corporations: A comprehensive review and comparison of Anglophone, Asian, Continental European and Nordic MNCs. Journal of World Business, 48 (1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Harzing, A.-W., & Pudelko, M. 2014. Hablas vielleicht un peu la mia language? A comprehensive overview of the role of language differences in headquarters–subsidiary communication. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (5): 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Haun, D. B., Rapold, C. J., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S. C. 2006. Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (46): 568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Henderson, A. D., & Stern, I. 2004. Selection-based learning: The coevolution of internal and external selection in high-velocity environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49 (1): 39–75.Google Scholar
  73. Higgins, M. J., & Rodriguez, D. 2006. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2): 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hill, J. H., & Mannheim, B. 1992. Language and world view. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21: 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2005. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2): 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Hoetker, G. 2007. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (4): 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hofstede, G. 1983. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14 (2): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hofstede, G. H. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Holmes, K. J., & Wolff, P. 2010. Simulation from schematics: Dorsal stream processing and the perception of implied motion. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  80. Holmes, K. J., & Wolff, P. 2011. Simulating realism in language comprehension. Paper presented the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  81. Howson, P. 2003. Due diligence: The critical stage in mergers and acquisitions. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  82. Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F. 1991. The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98 (3): 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Imai, M., & Gentner, D. 1997. A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62 (2): 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Inkpen, A. C. 1998. Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Executive, 12 (4): 69–80.Google Scholar
  85. Isphording, I. E., & Otten, S. 2011. Linguistic distance and the language fluency of immigrants. Working Paper, Ruhr Economic Paper No. 274.Google Scholar
  86. Isphording, I. E., & Otten, S. 2014. Linguistic barriers in the destination language acquisition of immigrants. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 105 (1): 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kale, P., & Singh, H. 2007. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (10): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kay, P., & Kempton, W. 1984. What is the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86 (1): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. 2012. The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23 (6): 661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. 1992. Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1): 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. King, G., & Zeng, L. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9 (2): 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ku, H., & Zussman, A. 2010. Lingua franca: The role of English in international trade. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 75 (2): 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (5): 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Leonard, D., & Straus, S. 1997. Putting your company’s whole brain to work. Harvard Business Review, 75 (4): 110–122.Google Scholar
  96. Levinson, S. C. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds), Language and Space, 109–169. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  97. Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D., & Rasch, B. H. 2002. Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition, 84 (2): 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fenning, C.D. 2014. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
  99. Li, D. 2006. Chinese as a lingua franca in greater China. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26: 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Li, P., & Gleitman, L. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83 (3): 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Lieberson, S. 1964. An extension of Greenberg’s linguistic diversity measures. Language, 40 (4): 526–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Lightfoot, D. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Liu, C. C., & Watanabe, T. 2012. Accounting for speed–accuracy tradeoff in perceptual learning. Vision Research, 61 (1): 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. 2005. Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50 (4): 315–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Lohmann, J. 2011. Do language barriers affect trade? Economics Letters, 110 (2): 159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Lucy, J. A. 2001. Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 13486–13490. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Lucy, J. A., & Gaskins, S. 2001. Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 257–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. 2006. The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (3): 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. 2011. Toward a perspective of cultural friction in international business. Journal of International Management, 17 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. 2007. Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18 (12): 1077–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Macher, J. T., Mowery, D. C., & Di Minin, A. 2007. The “non-globalization” of innovation in the semiconductor industry. California Management Review, 50 (1): 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Malt, B., & Wolff, P. 2010. Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Marschan, R., Welch, D., & Welch, L. 1997. Language: The forgotten factor in multinational management. European Management Journal, 15 (5): 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. McClain, L., & Huang, J. Y. S. 1982. Speed of simple arithmetic in bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 10 (6): 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. McDonough, L., Choi, S., & Mandler, J. M. 2003. Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology, 46 (3): 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. McElree, B., Jia, G., & Litvak, A. 2000. The time course of conceptual processing in three bilingual populations. Journal of Memory and Language, 42 (2): 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Mitsuhashi, H. 2002. Uncertainty in selecting alliance partners: The three reduction mechanisms and alliance formation processes. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10 (2): 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27 (5): 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Neeley, T. 2012. Global business speaks English: Why you need a language strategy now. Harvard Business Review, 90 (5): 116–124.Google Scholar
  120. Neeley, T., & Kaplan, R. S. 2014. What’s your language strategy? Harvard Business Review, 92 (9): 70–76.Google Scholar
  121. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  122. Newcombe, N. S. 2005. Language as destiny? Or not. Human Development, 48 (5): 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Nickerson, C. 2005. English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (4): 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. 2004. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. STATA Journal, 4 (2): 154–167.Google Scholar
  125. Olofin, S., Salisu, A., Ademuyiwa, I., & Owuru, J. 2014. Determinants of a successful regional trade agreement in West Africa. In D. Seck (Ed), Regional economic integration in West Africa, 181–211. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Orr, R. J., & Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutional exceptions on global projects: A process model. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 562–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. 2008. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108 (1): 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. 2002. Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. Journal of Finance, 57 (6): 2533–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Porac, J. F., Wade, J. B., Fischer, H. M., Brown, J., Kanfer, A., & Bowker, G. 2004. Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy, 33 (4): 661–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen‐Smith, J. 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4): 1132–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Repkine, A. 2014. Ethnic diversity, political stability and productive efficiency: Empirical evidence from the African countries. South African Journal of Economics, 82 (3): 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Reuer, J. J., & Ragozzino, R. 2014. Signals and international alliance formation: The roles of affiliations and international activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (3): 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Rhodes, I., Nelson, C., & Berman, G. 2003. The key to successful collaborations: Rigorous and independent due diligence. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 9 (4): 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49 (6): 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (4): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Rothaermel, F. T., & Boeker, W. 2008. Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (1): 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Santacreu-Vasut, E., Shenkar, O., & Shoham, A. 2014. Linguistic gender marking and its international business ramifications. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (9): 1170–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sapir, E. 1929. The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5 (4): 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Sapir, E. 1949. Culture, language, and personality: Selected essays. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  141. Saxenian, A. 1994. Lessons from Silicon Valley. Technology Review, 97 (5): 42–51.Google Scholar
  142. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  143. Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Shenkar, O. 2012. Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (1): 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Yeheskel, O. 2008. From “distance” to “friction”: Substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 905–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Skilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. 2010. The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review, 35 (1): 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, Vol. 17, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  148. Smith, L. B., Colunga, E., & Yoshida, H. 2003. Making an ontology: Cross-linguistic evidence. In D. H. Rakison, & L. M. Oakes (Eds), Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion, 275–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Song, J., & Shin, J. 2008. The paradox of technological capabilities: A study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. The American Journal of Sociology, 106 (6): 1546–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Spear, S., & Bowen, H. K. 1999. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review, 77 (5): 96–108.Google Scholar
  152. Staats, B. R., & Upton, D. M. 2011. Lean knowledge work. Harvard Business Review, 89 (10): 100–110.Google Scholar
  153. Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., Weaver, K. M., & Dickson, P. H. 2000. The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 951–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Stuart, T. E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (3): 668–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Triandis, H. C. 2000. Culture and conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35 (2): 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Tung, R. L., & Verbeke, A. 2010. Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (8): 1259–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Noorderhaven, N. 2002. External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13 (6): 714–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Vasudeva, G., Spencer, J. W., & Teegen, H. J. 2012. Bringing the institutional context back in: A cross-national comparison of alliance partner selection and knowledge acquisition. Organization Science, 24 (2): 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. 2005. Grammatical gender effects on cognition: implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (4): 501–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Volkema, R. J. 1995. Creativity in MS/OR: Managing the process of formulating the problem. Interfaces, 25 (3): 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Waxman, S. R. 1999. Specifying the scope of 13-month-olds’ expectations for novel words. Cognition, 70 (3): B35–B50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. 1995. Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29 (3): 257–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Welch, D. E., Welch, L. S., & Marschan-Piekkari, R. 2001. The persistent impact of language on global operations. Prometheus, 19 (3): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. West, J., & Graham, J. L. 2004. A linguistic-based measure of cultural distance and its relationship to managerial values. Management International Review, 44 (3): 239–260.Google Scholar
  166. Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: Wiley: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  167. Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. 2007. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (19): 7780–7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Wolff, P., & Holmes, K. J. 2011. Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2 (3): 253–265.Google Scholar
  169. Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. 2012. Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (1): 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Zelner, B. A. 2009. Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (12): 1335–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business, Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Fox School of Business, Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations