Skip to main content

Determinants of a Successful Regional Trade Agreement in West Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regional Economic Integration in West Africa

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the determinants of effectiveness of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) at promoting regional trade in West Africa between 1995 and 2010. We employ the modified gravity model (GM) that allows for the inclusion of country specific and country-pair characteristics in addition to the traditional GM variables (income and distance). Our findings reveal that economic size, distance, geographical factors such as common border, landmass, landlockedness of countries and socioeconomic variables like common language, political stability and availability of infrastructure significantly influence intra-regional trade within the ECOWAS region. We also find that the francophones dominated region (WAEMU) is exports trade creating while the anglophones dominated region (WAMZ) is trade diverting. Therefore, for ECOWAS to be successful in terms of facilitating intra-regional trade, current efforts at forming a synergy between WAEMU and ECOWAS should take cognizance of promoting trade between members, irrespective of colonial origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unlike Africa, the contribution of other regions like Asia has been on the increase during the same period. This is partly due to the increasing competitiveness of the region and its transition to production of value added goods via improved technology.

  2. 2.

    Bundu Abass is a former Executive Secretary of ECOWAS.

  3. 3.

    This section on intra-regional trade excludes four countries namely Liberia, Guinea Bissau, Sierra Leone and Cape Verde because of lack of sufficient data.

  4. 4.

    It is important to note that the total value of intra-ECOWAS trade (both exports and imports) used here excludes those of Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Cape Verde because of lack of sufficient data. However, the results obtained are not expected to differ significantly from those in this section since this countries exert little influence on the total (precisely less than 10 % of the total).

  5. 5.

    For the sake of intellectual transparency, it is salient to note that this section gains extensively from the brilliant work done by Kepaptsoglou et al. 2010 especially in getting access to literatures and opinions that were hitherto beyond the reach of the author.

  6. 6.

    The authors deliberately selected the reviewed studies bearing in mind the fact that they adopted different methodologies. So we attempt to compare results when different methods were used.

  7. 7.

    The language dummy in Eq. 4 has been dropped in subsequent estimations involving RTAs to prevent a case of multicollinearity.

  8. 8.

    Variables adopted find their basis in some of the literatures reviewed in the third section above.

  9. 9.

    Other countries in the ECOWAS region (i.e. Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea Bissau and Cape Verde) were excluded because of lack of sufficient data as most of them faced problems of social unrest for a long period. However, we are confident that their exclusion will not significantly affect the estimation results as these countries have relatively small contributions to the region.

  10. 10.

    Find data at: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx

  11. 11.

    Find data at: http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm

  12. 12.

    This position is formed based on the level of FDI inflow into these countries from rational investors over the years of which Nigeria and Ghana account for about 54 % and 22 % respectively of total FDI into the countries in 2010.

  13. 13.

    The results of the variants of the RTA model that span 1995 to 2004, 2005 to 2010 and the pooled for 1995 to 2010 were found to be very similar in magnitude and signs. Although WAMZ was formed in the year 2000, since the result of the variant for 2005 to 2010 does not differ from other periods, it is safe to draw the afore-stated conclusions. Moreover, WAMZ and WAEMU are used here to check the effect of the dichotomy between Francophone and Anglophone West African countries.

References

  • Abbott P, Bentzen J, Tarp F (2008) Trade and development: lessons from Vietnam’s past trade agreements. World Dev 37(2):341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athukorala P (2012) Asian trade flows: trends, patterns and prospects. Jpn World Econ (forthcoming). doi:10.1016/j.japwor.2012.01.003, JAPWOR 760

  • Baier S, Bergstrand J (2004) Economic determinants of free trade agreements. J Int Econ 64(1):29–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier S, Bergstrand J (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? J Int Econ 71(1):72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi D, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2003) A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Econ Lett 80:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharyay B (2007) An empirical analysis on prospects and challenges of BIMSTEC-Japan trade integration. J f Asian Econ 18(3):509–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundu A (1995) ECOWAS and the future of regional integration in West Africa. In: Lavergne R (ed) Regional integration and cooperation in West Africa: a multidimensional perspective. International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrere C (2006) Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. Eur Econ Rev 50:223–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassim R (2001) The determinants of intra-regional trade in Southern Africa with specific references to South African and the rest of the region. DPRU working paper. Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Joshi S (2010) Third country effects on the formation of free trade agreements. J Int Econ 82:238–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly S (2009) Evaluating the trade effect of developing RTAs: a semi-parametric approach. J Econ Integr 24(4):709–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger P, Larch M (2011) An assessment of Europe agreement’s effect on bilateral trade GDP, and welfare. Eur Econ Rev 55:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger H, Egger P, Greenaway D (2008) The trade structure effects of endogenous regional trade agreements. J Int Econ 74:278–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi I (1997) The impact of regional trade and monetary schemes on intra-Sub Saharan Africa trade. In: Ademola O, Elbadawi I, Collier P (eds) Regional integration and trade liberalization in sub-Saharan Africa. Macmillan, London, pp 210–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippini C, Molini V (2003) The determinants of East Asian trade flows: a gravity equation approach. J Asian Econ 14(5):695–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster N, Poeschl J, Stehrer R (2011) The impact of preferential trade agreements on margin of international trade. Econ Syst 35:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004) Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. J Int Econ 63:369–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head K (2003) Gravity for beginners. University of British Columbia, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur J, Alba J, Park D (2010) Effects of hub-and-spoke free trade agreement on trade: A panel data analysis. World Dev 38(8):1105–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayathilaka R, Keembiyahetti N (2009) Adverse selection effect for South Asian countries in FTA formation: an empirical study on the determinants of FTA among the bilateral trading partners. South Asia Econ J 10(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jugurnath B, Stewart M, Brooks R (2007) Asia/Pacific regional trade agreements: an empirical study. J Asian Econ 18:974–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (2006) West African integration: a new development paradigm? The Wash Q 29(4): 81–97. The Centre for Strategic and International Studies and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepaptsoglou K, Karlaftis M, Tsamboulas D (2010) The gravity model specification for modeling international trade flows and free trade agreement effects: a 10-year review of empirical studies. Open Econ J 3:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Park I (2007) In search of optimized regional trade agreements and applications to East Asia. World Econ 30(5):783–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Owen R, van der Mensbrugghe D (2009) Regional integration in Asia and its effects on the EU and North America. J Asian Econ 20:240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnermann H (1966) An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann J (2011) Do language barriers affect trade? Econ Lett 110:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo R, Sekkat K (2004) Economic obstacles to expanding intra-African trade. World Dev 32(8):1309–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee C (2008) New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. J Int Econ 75:349–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Zarzoso I, Felicitas N, Horsewood N (2009) Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models. North Am J Econ Finance 20:46–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musila J (2005) The intensity of trade creation and trade diversion in COMESA, ECCAS and ECOWAS: a comparative analysis. J Afr Econ 14(1):117–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunkola O (1998) An empirical evaluation of trade potential in the economic community of West African states, vol 84, AERC research paper. African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyejide A (2003) Trade reforms for economic growth and poverty reduction. Dev Outreach 5(3):4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazoglou C (2007) Greece’s potential trade flows: a gravity model approach. Int Adv Econ Res 13(4):403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert R (2004) The social dimension of regional integration in ECOWAS, vol 49, Working paper. Policy Integration Department, International Labour Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisu A, Ademuyiwa I, Owuru J (2012) Intra-regional trade in WAEMU: an empirical study, Unpublished Manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloaga I, Winters A (2001) How has regionalism in the 1990s affected trade? North Am J Econ Finance 12:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international trade policy. Twentieth Century Fund Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD Statistics (database) (2011) Bilateral exports and imports merchandise trade by partners. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx

  • Vicard V (2009) Determinants of successful regional trade agreements, Paris School of Economics, University Paris i Pantheon-Sorbonne & Banque de Francey

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner J (1950) The customs union issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley J (2006) Recent regional agreements: why so many, why so much variance in form, why coming so fast, and where are they headed?, CESifo working paper no 1790. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25835

  • World Development Indicators (database). http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • Yang Y, Gupta S (2005) Regional trade agreements in Africa: past performance and the way forward, IMF working paper 5:36. IMF, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Idris Ademuyiwa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Tables

Appendix: Tables

Table 3 Percentage share of ECOWAS countries in intra-regional trade (1995–2010)
Table 4 Percentage share of developing and developed countries in ECOWAS’ total trade (1995–2010)
Table 5 Percentage share of African regions in ECOWAS’ trade (1995–2010)
Table 6 Percentage share of some major RTAs in ECOWAS’ total trade (1995–2010)
Table 7 Percentage share of intra-ECOWAS and extra-ECOWAS trade in total trade (1995–2010)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olofin, S., Salisu, A., Ademuyiwa, I., Owuru, J. (2014). Determinants of a Successful Regional Trade Agreement in West Africa. In: Seck, D. (eds) Regional Economic Integration in West Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01282-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics