Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating colony locations of bumble bees with moving average model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 September 2002

It is very difficult to find natural colonies of bumble bees in the field. In this study, the yearly dynamics of floral resources and foraging bumble bee workers were investigated. The optimal colony locations were estimated from the data using moving average on the assumption that bumble bee queens and workers were omniscient. Fortunately, a colony of Bombus ardens was found, and the true location of the colony was evaluated with the estimated optimal locations. The true location was optimal at the latter half of the breeding season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bowers M. A. (1985) Bumblebee colonization, extinction, and reproduction in subalpine meadows in Northeastern Utah. Ecology 17: 914–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell J. E., Osborne J. L. & Goulson D. (2000) An economic model of the limits to foraging range in central place foragers with numerical solutions for bumblebees. Ecological Entomology 17: 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad W. E. (1996) Do bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) really forage close to their nests? Journal of Insect Behavior 17: 163– 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukas R. & Edelstein-Keshet L. (1998) The spatial distribution of colonial food provisioners. Journal of Theoretical Biology 17: 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell S. D. & Lucas H. L. Jr (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 17: 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B. (1976) Foraging specialisations of individual bumblebees. Ecological Monographs 17: 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B. (1979) Bumblebee Economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katayama E. & Ochiai H. (1980) [On the locating and collecting techniques of bumblebee nests.] Seibutsu-Kyozai 17: 45–63 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato M., Matsumoto M. & Kato T. (1993) Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community in the cool-temperate subalpine forests and meadows at Mt. Kushigata in the central part of Japan. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 17: 119–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells C. M. & Stephens D. W. (1983) Central place foraging: Single-prey loaders again. Animal Behaviour 17: 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld J. T. (1989) Central place foraging: Optimal load size for net and gross energy maximizers. Oikos 17: 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M. & Parker G. A. (1991) Competition for resources. In: Behavioral Ecology, 3rd edn (eds J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies) pp. 137–168. Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J. L., Clark S. J., Morris R. J., Williams I. H., Riley J. R., Smith A. D., Reynolds D. R. & Edwards A. S. (1999) A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology 17: 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley J. R., Reynolds D. R., Smith A. D., Edwards A. S., Osborne J. L., Williams I. H. & McCartney H. A. (1999) Compensation for wind drift by bumble-bees. Nature 17: 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami S. F. (1976) Specific differences in the bionomic characters of bumblebees. A comparatative review. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 6, Zoology. 17: 390–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville N. M., Dramstad W. E., Fry G. L. A. & Corbet S. A. (1997) Bumblebee movement in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 17: 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P., Kacelnik A. & Houston A. I. (1985) Honeybees maximise efficiency by not filling their crop. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17: 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T. W. (1979) Generality of the size-distance relation in models of optimal foraging. American Naturalist 17: 902–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sota T. (1993) Flower-visit by bumblebees in the alpine zone of Mt. Shiroumadake. New Entomologist 17: 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner D. L. (2000) Do you see what I mean? Indices of central tendency. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 17: 833–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomono T. & Sota T. (1997) The life history and pollination ecology of bumblebees in the alpine zone of central Japan. Japanese Journal of Entomology 17: 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther-Hellwig K. & Frankl R. (2000) Foraging distances of Bombus muscorum, Bombus lapidarius, and Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 17: 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yumoto T. (1986) The ecological pollination syndromes of insect-pollinated plants in an alpine meadow. Ecological Research 17: 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Nakamura.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11284-002-0457-9

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamura, H., Toquenaga, Y. Estimating colony locations of bumble bees with moving average model. Ecol Res 17, 39–48 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00461.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00461.x

Key words

Navigation