Skip to main content
Log in

Meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin-loaded liposomes sterically stabilised with poly(ethylene glycol) of different length and density: characterisation, in vitro cellular uptake and phototoxicity

  • Paper
  • Published:
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the effects of density and thickness of PEG coating on in vitro cellular uptake, and dark- and photo-toxicity of liposomal formulations (Fospeg) of the photodynamic agent meta-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin (m-THPC). The cellular uptake of various Fospeg formulations was determined by flow cytometry in CCD-34Lu human normal fibroblasts and A549 lung cancer cells. Dark and light-induced cytotoxicity was measured by MTS assay after exposure to increasing concentrations of Fospeg only and followed by irradiation with red light. Intracellular localization of m-THPC delivered by Fospeg was determined by fluorescence microscopy. The studies were carried out in comparison with m-THPC delivered by the standard solvent. In the dark all Fospeg formulations were less cytotoxic than m-THPC in standard solvent (ethanol/poly(ethylene glycol 400/water; 20:30:50 by vol.) and cytotoxicity decreased by increasing PEGylation. m-THPC delivered as Fospeg was internalised by endocytosis and localised mainly in the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum. The efficiency of cellular uptake of Fospeg was reduced by 30-40% with respect to m-THPC in standard solution causing a slight reduction of the phototoxicity but without serious impairment of the efficacy of the treatment. Our study suggests that PEGylated liposomes are promising nanocarriers for the delivery of photosensitisers for photodynamic therapy because they reduce dark cytotoxicity while preserving therapeutic efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. E. Dolmans, D. Fukumura and R. K. Jain, Photodynamic therapy for cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2003, 3, 380–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. J. N. Silva, P. Filipe, P. Morlière, J. C. Mazière, J. P. Freitas, M. M. Gomes and R. Santus, Photodynamic therapy: dermatology and ophthalmology as main fields of current applications in clinic, Biomed. Mater. Eng., 2008, 18, 319–327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. N. L. Oleinick and H. H. Evans, The photobiology of photodynamic therapy: cellular targets and mechanisms, Radiat. Res., 1998, 150, S146–S156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K. J. Lorenz and H. Maier, Photodynamic therapy with meta-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorine (Foscan) in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: experience with 35 patients, Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol., 2009, 266, 1937–1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. S. Betz, W. Rauschning, E. P. Stranadko, M. V. Riavow, V. Albrecht, N. E. Nifantiev and C. Hopper, Optimization of treatment parameters for Foscan-PDT of basal cell carcinomas, Lasers Surg. Med., 2008, 40, 300–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Baas, A. E. Saarnak, H. Oppelaar, H. Neering and F. A. Stewart, Photodynamic therapy with meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin for basal cell carcinoma: a phase I/II study, Br. J. Dermatol, 2001, 145, 75–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S. G. Bown, A. Z. Rogowska, D. E. Whitelaw, W R. Lees, L. B. Lovat, P. Ripley, L. Jones, P. Wyld, A. Gillams and A. W R. Hatfield, Photodynamic therapy for cancer of the pancreas, Gut, 2002, 50, 549–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. C. M. Moore, T. R. Nathan, W. R. Lees, C. A. Mosse, A. Freeman, M. Emberton and S. G. Bown, Photodynamic therapy using meso tetra hydroxyl phenyl chlorine (m-THPC) in early prostate cancer, Lasers Surg. Med., 2006, 38, 356–363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Reddi, Role of delivery vehicles for photosensitizers in the photodynamic therapy of tumours, J. Photochem. Photobiol, B, 1997, 37, 189–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G L. Scherphof, Uptake and intracellular processing of targeted and non targeted liposomes by rat Kupffer cells in vivo and in vitro, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1985, 446, 368–384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D. C. Drummond, O. Meyer, K. Hong, D. B. Kirpotin and D. Papahadjopoulos, Optimizing liposomes for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to solid tumours, Pharmacol. Rev., 1999, 51, 691–743.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Maeda, J. Wu, T. Sawa, Y. Matsumura and K. Hori, Tumour vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review, J. Controlled Release, 2000, 65, 271–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Romberg, W. E. Hennink and G. Storm, Sheddable coating for long-circulating nanoparticles, Pharm. Res., 2008, 25, 55–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Pegaz, E. Debefve, J. P. Ballini, G. Wagnieres, S. Spaniol, V Albrecht, D. V. Scheglmann, N. E. Nifantiev, H. van den Bergh and Y N Konan-Kouakou, Photothrombic activity of m-THPC-loaded liposomal formulations: pre-clinical assessment on chick chorioallantoic membrane model, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2006, 28, 134–140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Hansch, O. Frey, M. Gajda, S. Graefe, J. Boettcher, R. Bräuer and W A. Kaiser, Photodynamic treatment as a novel approach in the therapy of arthritic joints, Lasers Surg. Med., 2008, 40, 265–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Buchholz, B. Kaser-Hotz, T. Khan, B. C. Rohrer, K Melzer, R. A. Schwendener, M. Roos and H. Walt, Optimizing photodynamic therapy: in vivo pharmacokinetics of liposomal meta-(tetrahydroxyphenyl)chlorin in feline squamous cell carcinoma, Clin. Cancer Res., 2005, 11, 7538–7544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Compagnin, L. Bau, M. Mognato, L. Celotti, G. Miotto, M. Arduini, F. Moret, C. Fede, F. Selvestrel, I. M. Rio Echevarria, F. Mancin and E. Reddi, The cellular uptake of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin entrapped in organically modified silica nanoparticles is mediated by serum proteins, Nanotechnology, 2009, 20, 345101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Kesslich, J. Berlanda, K Plaetzer, B. Krammer and F. Berr, Comparative characterisation of the efficiency and cellular pharmacokinetics of Foscan®- and Foslip®-based photodynamic treatment in human biliary tract cancer cell lines, Photochem. Photobiol Sci., 2007, 6, 619–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Berlanda, T. Kesslich, V Engelhardt, B. Krammer and K. Plaetzer, Comparative in vitro study on the characteristics of different photosensitizers employed in PDT, J. Photochem. Photobiol, B, 2010, 100, 173–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Reshetov, D. Kachatkou, T. Shmigol, V Zorin, M. A. D’Hallewin, F. Guillemin and L. Bezdetnaya, Redistribution of metatetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (m-THPC) from conventional and PEGy-lated liposomes to biological substrates, Photochem. Photobiol Sci., 2011, 10, 911–919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. M. H. Teiten, L. Bezdetnaya, P. Morliere, R. Santus and F. Guillemin, Endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus are the preferential sites of Foscan® localisation in cultured tumour cells, Br. J. Cancer, 2003, 88, 146–152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Compagnin, C., Moret, F., Celotti, L. et al. Meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin-loaded liposomes sterically stabilised with poly(ethylene glycol) of different length and density: characterisation, in vitro cellular uptake and phototoxicity. Photochem Photobiol Sci 10, 1751–1759 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1pp05163f

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c1pp05163f

Navigation