Abstract
Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) is an oscillatory synchronization of 15–35 Hz (β-band) between electroencephalogram (EEG) of the sensorimotor cortex and electromyogram of contracting muscles. Although we reported that the magnitude of CMC varies among individuals, the physiological mechanisms underlying this variation are still unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the associations between CMC and intracortical inhibition (ICI) in the primary motor cortex (M1)/recurrent inhibition (RI) in the spinal cord, which probably affect oscillatory neural activities. Firstly, we quantified ICI from changes in motor-evoked potentials induced by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in M1 during tonic isometric voluntary contraction of the first dorsal interosseous. ICI showed a significant, negative correlation with the strength of EEG β-oscillation, but not with the magnitude of CMC across individuals. Next, we quantified RI from changes in H-reflexes induced by paired-pulse electrical nerve stimulation to the posterior tibial nerve during isometric contraction of the soleus muscle. We observed a significant, positive correlation between RI and peak CMC across individuals. These results suggest that the local inhibitory interneuron networks in cortical and spinal levels are associated with the oscillatory activity in corticospinal loop.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Significant coherence between the sensorimotor cortex activity (measured by electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetoencephalogram in humans, and local field potential in monkeys) and muscle activity, measured by electromyogram (EMG) of contracting muscles, was first reported ~20 years ago1,2. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) has been considered to reflect the mutual interaction between the sensorimotor cortex and contracting muscles via descending motor pathways and ascending somatosensory pathways3,4,5,6,7. Recently, we have reported that the magnitude of CMC varies among individuals even in healthy young adults8,9,10. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying the inter-individual differences in CMC are still unclear. Although the inter-individual differences include some technical limitations for EEG/EMG, we believe that it is valuable to examine the physiological mechanisms behind inter-individual differences in CMC, since CMC is associated with insensible personal behaviour such as force steadiness10 and reaction time11.
Negative-feedback systems are known to generate oscillatory output12,13,14,15; this implies that inhibitory neural circuits are associated with CMC. A pharmacological study reported that 20 Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex are partially produced by local cortical circuits relying on GABAA-mediated intracortical inhibition (ICI)16. Thus, we hypothesised that ICI is a factor of individual differences in cortical β-oscillation, and also in CMC if oscillatory descending drives are directly transmitted to the periphery. However, the oscillations can be modulated at the spinal level. Renshaw cells are known to regulate oscillations in muscle activity by preventing synchronization of spinal motoneuron activity17,18,19. Therefore, we formulated the second hypothesis that recurrent inhibition (RI) of Renshaw cells is a second factor of individual differences in CMC.
The present study aimed to test the two aforementioned hypotheses. Firstly, we examined the relationship between CMC and ICI using the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) method among healthy participants. We measured the surface EMGs from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle in ICI experiments because motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are detected from finger muscles in TMS. Secondly, we examined the relationship between CMC and RI using the paired-pulse H-reflex method among healthy participants. We measured the surface EMGs from the soleus (SOL) in RI experiments, because RI, which can be quantitated by H-reflex method20, has been mostly evaluated from SOL21,22. We integrated the results from the two experiments and evaluated cortical and spinal factors related to inter-individual differences in CMC.
Results
ICI and CMC during FDI contraction
We calculated CMC from the EEG/EMG data during the isometric contraction of FDI without TMS and observed that the magnitude of CMC differed among the present participants. We also calculated values of ICI from the MEPs during the contractions with TMS. Figure 1 shows raw EEG and EMG signals, EEG and rectified EMG-power spectrum densities (PSDs), CMC, and MEPs recorded from 2 representative participants showing significant CMC (CMC+) and non-significant CMC (CMC−). Grouped discharges were observed in raw EMG waves of the CMC + participant, and β-peak was remarkable in the rectified EMG-PSD of the CMC+ participant than in that of the CMC− participant. However, MEP reduction because of the paired-pulse method was observed more clearly in the CMC− participant than in the CMC+ participant. These comparisons between CMC+ and CMC− participants were in contrast with our first hypothesis that the stronger the ICI, the greater the CMC. No significant correlation was detected between the peak values of ICI and CMC across all participants (p = 0.197) (Fig. 2A). However, EEG β-PSD correlated significantly and negatively with ICI (Fig. 2B) (r = −0.559, p = 0.037) (i.e. the stronger the ICI, the more prominent the EEG β-oscillations). As shown in Fig. 1, the CMC− participant had a more distinct β-band power in EEG PSD than the CMC− participant, although β-oscillations were observed in raw EEG waves of both participants.
RI and CMC during SOL contraction
We calculated CMC from the EEG/EMG data during isometric contraction of SOL without electrical nerve stimulation and observed that the magnitude of CMC in SOL differed among the present participants. We also calculated values of RI from H-reflex amplitudes measured in RI experiment (EXPRI). Figure 3 shows the raw EEG and EMG signals, EEG and rectified EMG-PSDs, CMC, and H-reflexes recorded from 2 representative participants (they are different individuals from the representative participants shown in Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 3, the CMC+ participant showed remarkable peaks at 22 Hz in EEG, rectified EMG and CMC, and oscillatory activities were observed in raw EEG/EMG in contrast with the CMC− participant. An amplitude reduction from H to H′ was much more prominent in the CMC− participant than in the CMC+ participant, a certain level of reduction was observed between both groups of participants. This difference between participants implies that RI is stronger in CMC− participants than in CMC+ participants. To confirm whether the correlation between CMC and RI was significant, we plotted the peak values of CMC and RI during contraction task for all participants (Fig. 4A). According to the difference between representative participants, there was a significant positive correlation between them (r = 0.663, p = 0.009) (i.e. the stronger the RI, the weaker the CMC). On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between RI and EEG β-PSD (p = 0.26) (Fig. 4B).
Inter-individual correlation between CMCs recorded from FDI and SOL
We plotted the association between peak values of CMC recorded from FDI and SOL for 7 individuals who participated in both ICI experiment (EXPICI) and EXPRI. A significant positive correlation was observed between them (r = 0.882, p = 0.004) (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Firstly, we demonstrated that there is a distinct variation in EEG β-PSD across participants, similar to our previous study including 100 participants10, and a significant negative correlation between the strength of ICI and EEG β-PSD (note that the stronger the ICI, the larger the EEG β-PSD) (Fig. 2B). The value of ICI measured by a paired-pulse TMS method represents the strength of inhibition of GABAA-mediated interneurons23. Thus, our results suggest that the greater the inhibition of GABAA-mediated interneurons, the more prominent the β-band-synchronized activities of neurons within the sensorimotor cortex. Oscillations occur by the reverberation around feedback loop with a conduction delay. An intracortical circuit was shown that generated oscillations as an emergent network property arising from their local circuit connectivity15,24,25,26. A modelling study showed that the inhibitory interneurons played a key role in determining the oscillation frequency and amplitude, such that increase in the inhibitory connections lead to increase in the strength of oscillations15. Concurrently, a pharmacological study reported that 20 Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex were strengthened by administration of a drug enhancing GABAA-mediated inhibition16. In addition, a genetic study identified a significant linkage between β-oscillation in EEG and a set of GABAA receptor genes27. Taken together, this indicates that the strength of intracortical inhibitory interneuron activities might be determined by genetic variation of GABA receptor, and this might be a factor determining the inter-individual differences in the magnitude of EEG β-oscillation.
However, as shown in Fig. 2B, the obtained correlation between ICI and EEG β-oscillation was not strong but moderate (r = −0.559; p = 0.037). Not only ICI, but also other neural activities might be associated with producing oscillatory neural activities in the sensorimotor cortex. Neurons in the primary motor cortex are known to exhibit an intrinsic tendency to fire rhythmically28,29. It has been suggested that cell populations tend to synchronize repetitive firing at rates close to β-band because the probability of firing increases at ~30 ms after the previous action potential. Furthermore, Roopun et al.30 reported that layer V pyramidal neurons have gap-junctional connections between their axons, which lead to strong electrical coupling in the absence of synaptic activity. Therefore, althou ICI should be a determinant of individual strength of the β-oscillation in the sensorimotor cortex during isometric contraction, there might be other neural factors associated with cortical oscillations.
Significant correlation was observed only between the value of ICI and EEG β-oscillation but not between ICI and magnitude of CMC among participants (Fig. 2A). β-band CMC is considered to be a bidirectional phenomenon including descending and ascending neural signal flow3,6,7. Thus, oscillation descending from sensorimotor cortex to muscles is not the sole determinant of the magnitude of CMC. Comparing the power spectra of representative individuals (Fig. 1), the CMC+ participant showed more prominent EMG PSD in β-band than the CMC− participant, in agreement with the positive correlation between CMC and EMG β-PSD among individuals reported in our previous study 10, the CMC− participant had more distinct β-PSD in EEG rather than the CMC + participant. It is difficult to consider that the cortical oscillation is simply transmitted to the muscle.
Next, we focused on the spinal modulation of oscillatory corticospinal loop activity. The spinal cord is not only a relay point between the motor cortex and muscles, but also a regulator of activation of spinal motoneurons by its neural circuits. It is known that RI produced by Renshaw cells regulates motoneuron excitability and stabilizes firing rate. Moreover, this negative feedback system has been reported as a mechanism for reduction of oscillatory muscle activation by preventing motoneuron synchronization17,18,19. Therefore, to determine whether the RI is associated with the individual magnitude of CMC, we performed EXPRI using H-reflex method20.
The result from the RI experiment demonstrated a significant positive correlation between the strength of RI and the magnitude of CMC (Fig. 4A). This indicates that the greater the RI generated by spinal Renshaw cells, the weaker the magnitude of CMC. Recently, Williams and Baker31 reported that this inhibitory feedback plays a role as ‘neural filter’ and improves physiological tremor by reducing the magnitude of CMC at 10 and 20 Hz.
In addition, we considered the possibility that the spinal oscillation modulated by RI may influence cortical β-oscillation via ascending feedback. However, no significant correlation was detected between the RI and EEG β-oscillation across the individuals (Fig. 4B). This implies that some cortical-specific modifications have greater influences on the cortical oscillation than the effect of modulation by RI via ascending feedback. Thus, we suggest that the modulation by Renshaw cell activity works to weaken the oscillation derived from the cortex as ‘neural filter’, although the effect of modulation by RI may not be transmitted to a great extent; therefore, the strength of the RI was positively correlated with the magnitude of CMC.
In the ICI experiment, we recorded EMG from FDI; however, in the RI experiment, EMG was recorded from SOL. As we reported previously9, a remarkable inter-participant difference in CMC was observed from distal lower limb muscles than from those of upper limb. Therefore, we used mainly the TA or SOL for EEG-EMG assessments10,11,32. Moreover, H-reflex is usually recorded from SOL21,22, and in our experience, it is very difficult to record H-reflex from upper limb muscles in East Asian population. Therefore, we decided to record EMG from SOL in EXPRI. However, it is not easy to detect MEPs from lower limb muscles because representative area of the lower limb in the motor cortex is located deep in the longitudinal fissure. Thus, most of the ICI studies using TMS method would have used upper limb muscles to recorded MEPs33,34. Hence, we selected FDI that has been widely used to detect MEPs as a target muscle in EXPICI.
While this difference in recorded muscles between two experiments was unavoidable because of the aforementioned technical limitations, one might claim that background neural networks vary between motor areas of different muscles. As shown in Fig. 5, we observed a strong significant correlation between peak values of CMC for these muscles, although the strength of CMC for FDI was much weaker than that for SOL. Thus, the inter-individual variations in CMC seem to be retained across muscles. This strong correlation led us to speculate that the tendency of cortical and/or spinal motoneurons to fire synchronously is partially common among skeletal muscles.
However, we should not discuss physiological mechanisms underlying “CMC variation among muscles” and “CMC variation among individuals” in a similar way. For example, the significant positive correlation between CMC and RI in the SOL suggests that the strength of RI is a factor of individual difference in CMC recorded from the SOL. However, CMC in FDI is weaker than that in the SOL, although it is generally assumed that RI is absent in intrinsic hand muscles35,36. Thus, we cannot explain the difference in the magnitude of CMC between FDI and SOL from the view point of RI at the spinal level. Difference in CMC across individuals and/or muscles would be enmeshed with physiological factors such as density of cortical projection37,38, or the strength of local inhibitory circuits such as ICI and RI and other historical factors such as development, aging, and frequency of muscle use.
EEG and EMG assessments also include technical limitations derived from non-physiological factors. For example, the electrical field depends on thickness of scalp and skull in case of EEG39,40,41,42, and spatial filter design of EMG is influenced by fat/skin tissues43 and electrode locations44,45. These factors influence the EEG/EMG amplitudes. However, the magnitude of coherence is known to reflect the constancy of the amplitude ratio and/or the phase difference between 2 signals throughout data. Thus, the influence of aforementioned factors is considered limited. Moreover, the present study succeeded in detecting significant correlations between the neural inhibitions and β-band oscillatory activities in the corticospinal pathway using electrophysiological methods and indicated that the inter-individual difference in CMC presumably derives from the physiological factors. Therefore, the finding that neural factors associated with β-band CMC were found physiologically is even more significant. These data demonstrate that individual magnitude of CMC is associated with inner physiological factors in both cortical and spinal levels. Taking the present two main findings on ICI and RI together, we suggest that the magnitude of CMC includes the effects of cortical and spinal inhibitory circuits, such as ICI and RI, on synchronous neural activities. Cortical inhibitory circuits should have a role to generate cortical β-oscillations. On the other hand, spinal inhibitory circuits presumably modulate synchronizations of spinal α-motoneurons (Fig. 6). Previous studies have regarded CMC not only as the phenomenon reflecting the descending information flow but also as the bidirectional interaction between sensorimotor cortex and contralateral muscles. The present study would provide additional speculations that CMC is associated not only with the neural loop including efferent and afferent pathways, but also the local loops at the cortical and spinal levels.
Methods
The experiments were approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan, and were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided their informed consent for the study after receiving a detailed explanation of the purpose, potential benefits, and risks involved.
Participants
In total, 16 healthy young adults (11 male and 5 female participants; aged 21–35 years) with no history of neurological disorders voluntarily participated in this study. Eleven participants (6 male and 5 female participants; aged 21–24 years) attended the ICI experiment (EXPICI), and 12 participants (8 male and 4 female participants; aged 22–35 years) attended the RI experiment (EXPRI). Seven individuals (3 male and 4 female participants) participated in both of EXPICI and EXPRI.
Recordings
EEG was recorded from the scalp region overlying the sensorimotor cortex using 5 Ag/AgCl electrodes of 10 mm in diameter, placed at areas representative of the muscles to be investigated in each experiment (i.e. C3 and 20 mm frontal, back, left, and right positions in EXPICI; Cz and 4 surrounding positions in EXPRI, defined by the International 10–20 system). We placed the reference electrode for EEG at A1 (left earlobe) and the ground electrode on the forehead. EEG signals were derived using the spatial Laplacian filter46. Surface EMG was recorded from right FDI in EXPICI or from right SOL and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in EXPRI. The bipolar Ag/AgCl electrodes were attached to the belly of each muscle with an inter-electrode distance of 20 mm.
In EXPICI, EEG/EMG signals were amplified, band-pass filtered (EEG, 1–200 Hz; EMG, 10–500 Hz), and digitised at 1200 Hz using an EEG/EMG recording system (gUSB amp, Gugaer Technologies, Graz, Austria). The force signal was recorded with a strain gauge (DPM711B, Kyowa Electronic Instruments, Japan), and digitised at 1200 Hz by an analogue-to-digital converter (DAQCard-6062E; National Instruments Inc., Austin, TX, USA). In EXPRI, EEG signals were amplified, band-pass filtered (2–500 Hz), and digitised at 2400 Hz using the same recording system. EMG signals were amplified and band-pass filtered (20–1000 Hz) using a bio-signal recording system (Neuropack X1 MEB-2306; Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Plantar flexion force was recorded with an ankle-dynamometer (MK-808052; ME incorporated, Nagano, Japan) and low-pass filtered at 50 Hz. EMG and force signals were digitised at 2400 Hz by an analogue-to-digital converter (NIUSB-6259 BNC, National Instruments Inc.). We originally designed measurement programs using MATLAB software (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
Stimulation
TMS
TMS was applied using a figure-eight shaped coil connected to the two Magstim 200 magnetic stimulators (Magstim, Whitland, UK). The optimal coil position where MEPs in FDI could be evoked with the lowest stimulus was marked with ink to ensure an exact repositioning of the coil throughout the experiment. The handle of the coil oriented backward so that the induced current was directed from posterior to anterior. At this position, the motor threshold (MT) intensity was defined as the lowest stimulator output intensity, capable of inducing an MEP of at least 50 μV peak-to-peak amplitude in relaxed muscles in at least half of the 10 trials. A sub-threshold conditioning stimulus (CS) was set at 80% of the MT, and a supra-threshold test stimulus (TS) was set at 120% of the MT47. Only TS was delivered for the single-pulse, and CS was applied through the same coil at 3 ms prior to TS for the paired-pulse33. Before the experiment, we confirmed that MEPs were not evoked by only CS during weak contractions.
H-reflex
H-reflex of the SOL was evoked by electrically stimulating the posterior tibial nerve. The cathode shaped as a half-ball (2 cm diameter; TF-98003, Unique Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was placed over the popliteal fossa. The anode Ag/AgCl electrode (2000 mm2; 019-768500, VIASYS Healthcare, Woking, UK) was placed immediately proximal to the patella. Two stimuli with different intensities (Stim1 and Stim2) as a 1 ms rectangular pulse were delivered by an electronic stimulation system (SEN-3301/SS-104J, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). Stim1 was adjusted so that maximal amplitude of H-reflex was observed, and Stim2 was defined to elicit maximal M-wave (Mmax) followed by no H-reflex during the contraction (about 110% of the stimulus intensity at which we first elicited Mmax). Only Stim1 was provided for the single-pulse, while Stim1 and Stim2 were given together with an interval of 10 ms for the paired-pulse20. The preceding Stim1 not only elicits H-reflex, but also activates Renshaw cells which feedback inhibition to the same α-motoneuron pool. When Stim2 is applied just 10 ms after Stim1, the H-reflex discharge evoked by Stim1 collides an antidromic motor volley caused by the following Stim2. However, Ia inputs caused by Stim2 can activate the α-motoneurons, evoking the second H-reflex (H′). As this H′-reflex is affected by an inhibitory input from RI, which is activated by Stim1, its amplitude is smaller than the H-reflex evoked by single pulse method. Because of such mechanism, the H-reflex inhibited by RI can be detected by the paired-pulse H-reflex method.
Experimental protocol
EXPICI
Each participant was comfortably seated on a chair, and the right hand was supported by the splint with the strain gauge. Before the experiment, we measured force levels of the FDI during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Firstly, the participants performed isometric voluntary contraction tasks of the FDI at 5% of MVC without stimulation. The participants repeated FDI contraction for 15 s with a rest interval of 5 s for 35 times in total48. During this task, participants were given a visual feedback about the level of abduction force provided via a level meter on a computer screen positioned 0.5 m in front of them, and were instructed to maintain their exerted force with accuracy.
Next, TMS was applied over the hand area of the left primary motor cortex 60 times (single-pulse, 30 times; paired-pulse, 30 times) in a random order during the isometric contraction. The participants were instructed to perform 5% MVC abduction for 15 s and were provided the stimuli twice in a trial at unpredictable times within 5 s ± 500 ms and 13 s ± 500 ms after an onset of contraction. The task included a series of 30 trials of 15 s each with a rest interval of 5 s.
EXPRI
Each participant was comfortably seated on a chair with an ankle dynamometer. Before the experiment, we measured MVC of SOL. Firstly, participants performed isometric voluntary contraction task of SOL at 15% MVC for 60 s without stimulation. The participants were given the feedback of plantar flexion force level provided on the screen positioned 1.2 m front of them, and were instructed to keep their force levels.
Next, the stimulus was provided to the participants during the contraction. Before the measurement, we determined the intensity of Stim1 and Stim2 during the isometric contraction at 15% MVC. The participants repeated the contraction for 7 s with a rest interval of 15 s for 40 times in total, and were provided the stimulus (single-pulse or paired-pulse) at unpredictable times within 6 s ± 500 ms after an onset of the contraction (i.e. single-pulse, 20 times; paired-pulse, 20 times in total). After the experiment, the participants were instructed to perform additional contractions and were provided only S2, to obtain Mmax responses.
Data analysis
Coherence analysis
For the data of the no-stimulation tasks, we evaluated power spectral density using Welch’s method for EEG and rectified EMG signals and CMC. Before the following analyses, EEG signals were band-pass filtered (2–100 Hz), and Laplacian-filtered signals at C3 were calculated for EXPICI or at Cz for EXPRI. To detect the motor unit grouped discharge, we used the rectification for EMG. This pre-processing is necessary to extract the envelope of the modulation wave49,50,51,52. Raw EEG and rectified EMG signals were segmented into artefact-free epochs including 2048 data points. We obtained non-overlapped 245 epochs in total (7 epochs per contraction for 15 s) in EXPICI and 70 epochs from contraction for 60 s in EXPRI. Each epoch was convoluted with Hanning-window to reduce spectral leakage2,53,54. We determined correlations between EEG and rectified EMG using coherence function55 (see Appendix A), and estimated the 95% significant level (SL)55,56,57 (see Appendix B). We also determined the ratio of the sum of the PSD within the β-band (15–30 Hz) to that of 3–50 Hz frequency range for EEG-PSD, and these values were defined as EEG β-PSD.
ICI estimation
Firstly, we performed signals averaging for 30 EMG responses obtained from each of single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS methods, and defined peak-to-peak amplitudes of the averaged waves as MEPs. Next, to confirm that ICI was elicited by the present paired-pulse TMS method, we examined differences in MEP between single-pulse and paired-pulse methods, using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (single = 3.05 ± 1.98 mV, paired = 1.85 ± 1.40 mV, p = 0.008). The ratio of the conditioned MEP to the unconditioned MEP was determined as a measure of ICI. Accordingly, a smaller value indicated greater inhibition.
RI estimation
Firstly, as in ICI estimation, we provided signals averaging for 20 EMG responses obtained from each stimulation, and defined peak-to-peak amplitudes of the averaged waves as H or H′. Next, to confirm that RI was elicited by the present paired-pulse H-reflex method, we examined differences between H and H′ using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (single = 6.75 ± 2.99 mV, paired = 0.88 ± 0.72 mV, p = 0.002). The ratio of H′ to H was determined as a measure of RI, and smaller RI meant greater inhibition.
Statistical analyses
Coherence was normalized using the arc hyperbolic tangent transformation for statistical analyses55. To confirm whether there were significant correlations between ICI and the peak magnitude of CMC between ICI and EEG β-PSD between RI and the peak value of CMC and between RI and EEG β-PSD, Pearson correlation coefficients between these values were determined. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Inc., Armonk, New York, USA).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Matsuya, R. et al. Inhibitory interneuron circuits at cortical and spinal levels are associated with individual differences in corticomuscular coherence during isometric voluntary contraction. Sci. Rep. 7, 44417; doi: 10.1038/srep44417 (2017).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Conway, B. A. et al. Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man. J. Physiol. 489, 917–924 (1995).
Baker, S. N., Olivier, E. & Lemon, R. N. Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task-dependent modulation. J. Physiol. 501(1), 225–41 (1997).
Kilner, J. M., Fisher, R. J. & Lemon, R. N. Coupling of oscillatory activity between muscles is strikingly reduced in a deafferented subject compared with normal controls. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 790–796 (2004).
Mima, T., Steger, J., Schulman, A. E., Gerloff, C. & Hallett, M. Electroencephalographic measurement of motor cortex control of muscle activity in humans. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111, 326–337 (2000).
Ohara, S. et al. Electrocorticogram-electromyogram coherence during isometric contraction of hand muscle in human. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111, 2014–2024 (2000).
Pohja, M. & Salenius, S. Modulation of cortex-muscle oscillatory interaction by ischaemia-induced deafferentation. Neuroreport 14, 321–324 (2003).
Riddle, C. N. & Baker, S. N. Manipulation of peripheral neural feedback loops alters human corticomuscular coherence. J. Physiol. 566, 625–639 (2005).
Hashimoto, Y., Ushiba, J., Kimura, A., Liu, M. & Tomita, Y. Correlation between EEG-EMG coherence during isometric contraction and its imaginary execution. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars). 70, 76–85 (2010).
Ushiyama, J., Takahashi, Y. & Ushiba, J. Muscle dependency of corticomuscular coherence in upper and lower limb muscles and training-related alterations in ballet dancers and weightlifters. J. Appl. Physiol. 109, 1086–1095 (2010).
Ushiyama, J. et al. Between-subject variance in the magnitude of corticomuscular coherence during tonic isometric contraction of the tibialis anterior muscle in healthy young adults. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1379–1388 (2011).
Matsuya, R., Ushiyama, J. & Ushiba, J. Prolonged reaction time during episodes of elevated β-band corticomuscular coupling and associated oscillatory muscle activity. J. Appl. Physiol. 114, 896–904 (2013).
Bressloff, P. C. & Coombes, S. Dynamics of Strongly Coupled Spiking Neurons. Neural Comput. 12, 91–129 (2000).
Destexhe, A., Contreras, D. & Steriade, M. Mechanisms underlying the synchronizing action of corticothalamic feedback through inhibition of thalamic relay cells. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 999–1016 (1998).
Ernst, U., Pawelzik, K. & Geisel, T. Sychronization Induced by Temporal Delays in Pulse-Coupled Oscillators. Phsical Rev. Lett. 74, 1570–1573 (1995).
Pauluis, Q., Baker, S. N. & Olivier, E. Emergent oscillations in a realistic network: The role of inhibition and the effect of the spatiotemporal distribution of the input. J. Comput. Neurosci. 6, 27–48 (1999).
Baker, M. R. & Baker, S. N. The effect of diazepam on motor cortical oscillations and corticomuscular coherence studied in man. J. Physiol. 546, 931–42 (2003).
Stein, R. B. & Oguztoreli, M. N. Modification of muscle responses by spinal circuitry. Neuroscience 11, 231–240 (1984).
Windhorst, U. On the role of recurrent inhibitory feedback in motor control. Prog. Neurobiol. 49, 517–587 (1996).
Matthews, P. B. Spindle and motoneuronal contributions to the phase advance of the human stretch reflex and the reduction of tremor. J. Physiol. 498(1), 249–275 (1997).
Bussel, B. & Pierrot-Deseilligny, E. Inhibition of human motoneurons, probably of Renshaw origin, elicited by an orthodromic motor discharge. J. Physiol. 269, 319–339 (1977).
Capaday, B. Y. C. & Stein, R. B. Difference in the amplitude of the human soleus H reflex during walking and running. J. Physiol. 392, 513–522 (1987).
Crone, C. & Nielsen, J. Methodological implications of the post activation depression of the soleus H-reflex in man. Exp. Brain Res. 78, 28–32 (1989).
Ziemann, U., Lönnecker, S., Steinhoff, B. J. & Paulus, W. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann. Neurol. 40, 367–378 (1996).
Traub, R. D., Whittington, M. a., Colling, S. B., Buzsáki, G. & Jefferys, J. G. Analysis of gamma rhythms in the rat hippocampus in vitro and in vivo . J. Physiol. 493, 471–484 (1996).
Bush, P. & Sejnowski, T. Inhibition synchronizes sparsely connected cortical neurons within and between columns in realistic network models. J. Comput. Neurosci. 3, 91–110 (1996).
Wang, X. J. & Buzsáki, G. Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J. Neurosci. 16, 6402–6413 (1996).
Porjesz, B. et al. Linkage disequilibrium between the beta frequency of the human EEG and a GABAA receptor gene locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3729–33 (2002).
Wetmore, D. Z. & Baker, S. N. Post-spike distance-to-threshold trajectories of neurones in monkey motor cortex. J. Physiol. 555, 831–50 (2004).
Chen, D. & Fetz, E. E. Characteristic membrane potential trajectories in primate sensorimotor cortex neurons recorded in vivo . J. Neurophysiol. 94, 2713–25 (2005).
Roopun, A. K. et al. A beta2-frequency (20–30 Hz) oscillation in nonsynaptic networks of somatosensory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15646–15650 (2006).
Williams, E. R. & Baker, S. N. Renshaw cell recurrent inhibition improves physiological tremor by reducing corticomuscular coupling at 10 Hz. J. Neurosci. 29, 6616–6624 (2009).
Ushiyama, J. et al. Contraction level-related modulation of corticomuscular coherence differs between the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 112, 1258–1267 (2012).
Kujirai, T. et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 471, 501–519 (1993).
Münchau, A. et al. Functional connectivity of human premotor and motor cortex explored with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci. 22(2), 554–61 (2002).
Katz, R., Mazzocchio, R., Penicaud, A. & Rossi, A. Distribution of recurrent inhibition in the human upper limb. Acta Physiol. Scand. 149, 183–198 (1993).
Illert, M. & Kümmel, H. Reflex pathways from large muscle spindle afferents and recurrent axon collaterals to motoneurones of wrist and digit muscles: A comparison in cats, monkeys and humans. Exp. Brain Res. 128, 13–19 (1999).
Jankowska, E., Padel, Y. & Tanaka, R. Projections of pyramidal tract cells to α-motoneurones innervating hind-limb muscles in the monkey. J. Physiol. 249, 637–667 (1975).
Asanuma, H. et al. Pattern of projections of individual pyramidal tract neurons to the spinal cord of the monkey. J. Physiol. (Paris). 74, 235–6 (1978).
Malmivuo, J., Suihko, V. & Eskola, H. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44, 196–208 (1997).
Nunez, P. L. Generation of human EEG by a combination of long and short range neocortical interactions. Brain Topogr. 1, 199–215 (1989).
Olejniczak, P. Neurophysiologic basis of the EEG. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 23, 186–189 (2006).
Yan, Y., Nunez, P. L. & Hart, R. T. Finite-element model of the human head: scalp potentials due to dipole sources. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 29, 475–481 (1991).
Farina, D., Cescon, C. & Merletti, R. Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol. Cybern. 86, 445–456 (2002).
Jensen, C., Vasseljen, O. & Westgaard, R. H. The influence of electrode position on bipolar surface electromyogram recordings of the upper trapezius muscle. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 67, 266–273 (1993).
Roy, S. H., De Luca, C. J. & Schneider, J. Effects of electrode location on myoelectric conduction velocity and median frequency estimates. J. Appl. Physiol. 61, 1510–1517 (1986).
Hjorth, B. An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39, 526–530 (1975).
Christova, M. I. et al. Motor cortex excitability during unilateral muscle activity. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 16, 477–484 (2006).
Kristeva, R., Patino, L. & Omlor, W. Beta-range cortical motor spectral power and corticomuscular coherence as a mechanism for effective corticospinal interaction during steady-state motor output. Neuroimage 36, 785–792 (2007).
Halliday, D. M. & Farmer, S. F. On the need for rectification of surface EMG. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 3547; author reply 3548–3549 (2010).
Boonstra, T. W. & Breakspear, M. Neural mechanisms of intermuscular coherence: implications for the rectification of surface electromyography. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 796–807 (2012).
Ward, N. J., Farmer, S. F., Berthouze, L. & Halliday, D. M. Rectification of EMG in low force contractions improves detection of motor unit coherence in the beta-frequency band. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 1744–50 (2013).
Dakin, C. J., Dalton, B. H., Luu, B. L. & Blouin, J.-S. Rectification is required to extract oscillatory envelope modulation from surface electromyographic signals. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 1685–91 (2014).
Farmer, S. F., Bremner, F. D., Halliday, D. M., Rosenberg, J. R. & Stephens, J. A. The frequency content of common synaptic inputs to motoneurones studied during voluntary isometric contraction in man. J. Physiol. 470, 127–155 (1993).
Gross, J. et al. Cortico-muscular synchronization during isometric muscle contraction in humans as revealed by magnetoencephalography. J. Physiol. 527(3), 623–631 (2000).
Halliday, D. M. et al. A framework for the analysis of mixed time series/point process data—theory and application to the study of physiological tremor, single motor unit discharges and electromyograms. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 64, 237–278 (1995).
Rosenberg, J. R., Amjad, a. M., Breeze, P., Brillinger, D. R. & Halliday, D. M. The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 53, 1–31 (1989).
Kilner, J. M., Baker, S. N., Salenius, S., Hari, R. & Lemon, R. N. Human cortical muscle coherence is directly related to specific motor parameters. J. Neurosci. 20, 8838–8845 (2000).
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by Keio Gijuku Academic Development Funds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R. Matsuya, J. Ushiyama, and J. Ushiba designed the experiments; R. Matsuya performed the experiments; R. Matsuya analysed the data; R. Matsuya, J. Ushiyama, and J. Ushiba interpreted the results; R. Matsuya drafted the manuscript; and J. Ushiyama and J. Ushiba edited the manuscript. All authors approved of the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuya, R., Ushiyama, J. & Ushiba, J. Inhibitory interneuron circuits at cortical and spinal levels are associated with individual differences in corticomuscular coherence during isometric voluntary contraction. Sci Rep 7, 44417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44417
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44417
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Controlled delivery of a neurotransmitter–agonist conjugate for functional recovery after severe spinal cord injury
Nature Nanotechnology (2023)
-
Feature stability and setup minimization for EEG-EMG-enabled monitoring systems
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (2022)
-
Combined effect of contraction type and intensity on corticomuscular coherence during isokinetic plantar flexions
European Journal of Applied Physiology (2022)
-
Specific modulation of corticomuscular coherence during submaximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Age-specific modulation of intermuscular beta coherence during gait before and after experimentally induced fatigue
Scientific Reports (2020)