Abstract
Background
Improvement in gene modifications of donor pigs has led to the prevention of early cardiac xenograft rejection and significantly prolonged cardiac xenograft survival in both heterotopic and orthotopic preclinical non-human primate (NHP) models. This progress formed the basis for FDA approval for compassionate use transplants in two patients.
Methods
Based on our earlier report of 9-month survival of seven gene-edited (7-GE) hearts transplanted (life-supporting orthotopic) in baboons, we transplanted 10 gene-edited pig hearts into baboons (n = 4) using non-ischemic continuous perfusion preservation (NICP) and immunosuppression regimen based on co-stimulation blockade by anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This pivotal study expands on the 7-GE backbone, with 3 additional gene edits, using 10-GE pigs as donors to baboon recipients.
Results
10 GE cardiac xenografts provide life-supporting function up to 225 days (mean 128 ± 36 days) in a non-human primate model. Undetectable or latent porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) does not influence cardiac xenograft survival in this study but still needs more exploration with a larger cohort. Xenograft histology demonstrates adipose (Fat) deposition (n = 1), chronic vasculopathy (n = 1), micro and macro thrombosis, and acute cellular rejection (n = 1).
Conclusions
These data demonstrate that 10 GE cardiac xenografts have variable cardiac xenograft survival in NHP due to perhaps presence of 4th antigen and require further study. However, these 10GE organs may be suitable for clinical cardiac xenotransplantation and have already been utilized in two human cases.
Plain language summary
There is a shortage of organs donated for use in transplantation. Instead, animal organs could potentially be used for people with end-stage organ failure. We modified pig hearts to make them more like human organs and transplanted them into non-human primates. The pig hearts functioned in the non-human primates for up to 225 days. These hearts could also potentially be used in people with heart failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Clinical cardiac xenotransplantation could provide a solution for end-stage heart failure patients waiting for heart transplantation who die waiting for a suitable donor or do not otherwise qualify. Two genetically engineered (GE) pig hearts, with ten gene edits (10GE), were recently transplanted into two human recipients. One survived 60 days; the other recipient survived forty1,2,3. This is a great promise to alleviate the shortage of donor organs for transplantation. Earlier, we reported the 9-month survival of a multi-gene pig heart with 7-GE in a non-human primate ((NHP) using co-stimulation blockade-(anti-CD40 antibody) based immunosuppressive (IS) (Mohiuddin Regimen)4. 7GE includes the deletion of two carbohydrate antigens (i.e., GGTA1 and β4GalNT2) along with the expression of five human genes (i.e., TBM, EPCR CD46, and CD47). In addition, three additional modifications, including the deletion of growth hormone receptors and overexpression of DAF and HO1, were made in 10GE pig hearts. Längin et al. have also reported successful life-supporting porcine cardiac xenotransplantation (XTx) in NHP5. A combination of gene modifications of donor pigs and non-ischemic cardiac preservation (NICP) improves cardiac xenograft survival significantly and prevents xenograft rejection.
The immunobiology of cardiac xenotransplantation and justification for using each gene edit have been comprehensively reviewed elsewhere but are briefly summarized below6,7.
Xenograft rejection occurs primarily due to endothelial cell activation by preformed antibodies against porcine donor antigens in the recipient8,9. Preformed and elicited antibodies also promote coagulation and activate platelets, contributing to graft loss due to thrombotic microangiopathy10. Three carbohydrate antigens (i.e., α1,3-galactose (Gal), B4GALNT2KO, and CMAHKO) required knockout based on the evidence of extensive research over the past 30 years11,12.
Studies have suggested a complex interplay between blood pressure, growth hormone receptor, and cardiac xenograft growth (or hypertrophy)13,14,15. To control the intrinsic growth of pigs and their organs (in anticipation of implantation into a non-growing chest of an adult recipient), the growth hormone receptor gene (GHR) has been knocked out4. Mini pigs, which naturally have a slow growth rate, have also been suggested for xenotransplantation16. We used the option of GHR knockout to improve our ability to size-match the donor hearts with the recipient organ4. However, in prior studies, we have shown that the cause of the growth of porcine organs after transplantation is likely multifactorial15.
Complement can activate the clotting cascade by binding complement-fixing antibodies onto endothelium. Human complement regulatory proteins like CD46, decay-accelerating factor (DAF), and CD59 have been used to prevent complement activation, with synergistic effects in combination4. In this study, we used two human complement regulatory genes (i.e., hDAF and hCD46) expression of the xenograft along a C1 Esterase inhibitor to suppress complement activation. C1 Esterase inhibitors, in contrast to the cobra venom factor used in prior studies, are already US Food and Drug Administration-approved and more readily translatable to the clinic.
Incompatibilities between primate and pig coagulation and anticoagulation factors can alter their function, contributing to coagulation dysfunction. Notable proteins include tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), thrombin, thrombomodulin (TBM), endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), and CD39. Systemic proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-a, etc.) upregulate or recruit recipient tissue factors (TF) on platelets and monocytes by interacting with porcine vascular endothelial cells, which can lead to coagulation through thrombin production. Therefore, donor 10-GE pigs used overexpression of two coagulation regulatory proteins (TBM and EPCR).
Several gene modifications have been incorporated to control inflammation, including CD47, which provides a “don’t eat me” signal to macrophages and anti-apoptotic genes like heme oxygenase 1 (HO1) and A207. Our 10 GE pigs expressed hCD47 and hHO1 in this study.
This study demonstrates the successful transplantation of 10-GE pig hearts with carbohydrate antigen knockout and overexpression of human genes to avoid rejection in non-human primates. These 10 GE pigs’ hearts are transplanted into humans without immediate rejections and we believe they will be suitable for providing donor organs and alleviate the donor shortage for end-stage organ failure patients who may not get human organs.
Methods
Animals
Specific pathogen-free Papio anubis baboons (Southwest National Primate Center, San Antonio, TX or MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX) both male and or female weighing 15–30 kg were selected based on the absence of specific pathogens of interest and used as recipients. Weight-matched GE German Landrace pigs (Revivicor Inc., Blacksburg, VA) either male or female were used as xenograft donors. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) were conducted to ensure adequate cardiac function and free of anatomic abnormalities. All animals were used in compliance with guidelines provided by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. The husbandry facility was certified by both the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AALAC) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and is frequently inspected by these agencies. The social and nutritional enrichment for these animals was provided as per institutional behaviorist recommendations.
Multi-gene modifications and health status of donor pig
The pig heart used as cardiac xenograft was produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer as previously described1,4,17, which was clonally derived from fibroblasts that included ten gene edits. Gene edits included the deletion of 4 genes (i.e., a galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (GGTA1), SDa blood group antigen (B4GALNT2), and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (CMAH) and growth hormone receptor (GHR)) and overexpression of six human genes (hCD46, hDAF, hTBM, hEPCR, CD47 HO-1). Deletion and overexpression of multi-gene were confirmed using flow cytometry western blot analysis, described previously1,18. All animals were housed in a HEPA filter-equipped clean facility and were used in compliance with guidelines provided by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Revivicor, Inc.
Immunosuppression (IS)
Previously reported costimulation-based IS was used4. IS regimen for all recipient baboons included induction which included Anti CD20 antibody, ATG, Berinert (C1 Esterase Inhibitor) primatized anti-CD40 (2C10R), and maintenance therapy (Mycophenolate (MMF) and primatized Anti-CD40 (2C10R), which has been summarized in Supplementary Table 1 (ST1)4,15.
Procurement of the donor heart and non-ischemic cardiac preservation (NICP)
Donor pig hearts were used from 8- to 12-week-old 10-GE GE pigs. Heart procurement was performed using blood cardioplegia with XVIVO© heart solution (XHS) from XVIVO© Perfusion, Gothenburg, Sweden19. A perfusion pressure of 20 mmHg and a physiological pH range of 7.2–7.6 was maintained in the aortic root. 10-GE pig hearts were NICP in the XVIVO© Perfusion system for at least 90 min.
Orthotopic transplantation and postoperative care
10-GE pig heart was transplanted into to baboon recipient (n = 4) in an orthotopic position using a modified Shumway procedure of atrial anastomosis technique19. Transplant without a 10-GE pig heart was not performed, however, pig hearts with different genetic modifications (3, 7, and 9-GE) were published before by us4 and others5. This is a non-human primate study and a large number of experiments could not be performed due to the scarcity of GE pigs and baboons. Therefore prior sample size calculations were not performed.
A cardiac telemetry device (Data Sciences International (DSI) St. Paul, MN) was used to monitor hemodynamics, heart rhythm, and temperature postoperatively. Baboons were extubated after hemodynamic stability was achieved on minimal ionotropic support, and adequate cardiac function was demonstrated by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Drug administration, ionotropic support, and other supplemental drugs (if needed) were administered through a tunneled central line tethered through the recipient’s cage. Critical care nurses and physicians provided ICU-level monitoring and management for the first 48–72 h postoperatively. As soon as deemed surgically appropriate, all baboons were placed on systemic heparin for an ACT goal of twice the baseline level. Recipient blood pressure and heart rate thresholds were not used to guide the use of any afterload reduction or chronotropic controlling agents.
Methods for evaluating xenograft function
A wireless continuous telemetry device (DSI, St. Paul, MN USA) with an implant was used to monitor the 10GE pig heart’s systolic and diastolic pressures, electrocardiogram (ECG), and the recipient’s temperature. Telemetry data from the implant was transmitted to a receiver attached and data was analyzed using Ponemah® Software (DSI, St. Paul, MN, USA)4,20.
Ultrasonography of the cardiac xenograft
TTEs were obtained on a GE Vivid I (GE Healthcare Chicago, IL) portable ultrasound machine whenever the recipient was sedated or as needed to investigate clinical status change. Color and pulse-wave Doppler were obtained across all visible native valves according to standard methods. Atrial mass was not quantified as a bi-atrial approach was utilized for transplantation. The ejection fraction was estimated visually, given the limitation in obtaining apical two-chamber views, as noted above, due to the rotation of the xenograft, preventing biplane measurements.
The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines were used to measure the left ventricular (LV) volumetric measurements As per ASE, LV mass was calculated by using the formulas (0.8 × 1.04 [(IVS + LVID + PWT)3 – LVID3] + 0.6.16)15. IVS refers to interventricular septum thickness. LVID and PWT is left ventricular internal diameter and posterior wall thickness, respectively. Due to the nature of this calculation, we acknowledge the limitations of the calculated LV mass measurements, as even small differences in the data can lead to considerable variations in LV mass. As a result, we conducted additional calculations to account for these discrepancies.
Laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry
Hematology, chemistry, and coagulation parameters were analyzed on peripheral blood and serum of the baboon recipients weekly for the first two months and then biweekly until the 10GE pig heart was explanted4,15.
Immune monitoring assays
Measurements of Non-Gal IgG, IgM serum antibodies, and CDC were performed as previously described to determine the antibody binding and activity with donor-specific cultured PAEC retrospectively4,21,22. Immune phenotyping for T and B cells was done by immunostaining using flow cytometry techniques. Different cell subtypes of T and B cell populations were identified using fluorochrome-labeled anti-human CD45 (Cat#563530; BD Biosciences) CD3 (Cat#552852; BD Biosciences), and CD20 (Cat#302322; Biolegend). Serum cytokine levels were measured with a Biolegend plex kit (Cat#740389; Biolegend) using flow cytometry.
Histological evaluation of biopsies and explants of xenografts
For light microscopy, paraffin sections of explanted cardiac xenografts and endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Sections were analyzed semi-quantitatively for hemorrhage, necrosis, thrombosis, and cellular infiltrates. Immunostaining for immunoglobulins (IgG (Cat# 760-2653), IgM (Cat# 760-2654) and complement (C3d (Cat#760-4522) and C4d (Cat# 760-4436) (Roche Tissue Diagnostics Indianapolis, IN) on paraffin section were performed. An independent pathologist examined all the specimens. Aperio Digital Pathology Slide Scanner (Leica Biosystems Wetzlar, Germany) was used with 20× magnification, resulting in a field of approximately 870 microns field size. Fields with the least amount of necrosis were chosen to prevent secondary deposition of IgG and then examined for capillary staining for IgG, IgM, and C4d. The intensity was measured for C4d staining as 0: negative or equivocal staining, 1+: faint positive staining, 2+: strong positive staining per the Society of Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP), Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology (AECVP) and the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Additionally, specimens were graded for microthrombi on a scale of 0–4+, where 1 + = >0 capillaries stained; 2 + = >1–5 capillaries stained; 3 + = >5–10 capillaries stained, 4 + = >10 capillaries stained, per high power field.
Statistics and reproducibility data analysis
All statistical analysis and graph tabulations, including Kaplan–Meyer curves and line graph plots, were performed on GraphPad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Results
Verification of donor pig gene expression
Genome editing was done to produce 10 gene edits pigs. Deletion of GGTA1, B4GALNT2, and CMAH was confirmed by flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) stained with IB4 lectin and DBA lectin. Growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene deletion was confirmed by Next-Gen DNA sequencing (MiSeq, Illumina). Variable human gene expression of individual transgenes (i.e., hCD46, hDAF, hTBM, EPCR, hHO-1, and hCD47) was observed in non-transplanted kidney tissue samples (Supplementary Fig. S1), porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAECs) and explanted heart by flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. S2) and by IHC (Supplementary Fig. S3), and western blot respectively (Supplementary Fig. S4)1,18. Expression of hCD47, hCD46, and hHO1 transgenes was weak in explanted xenograft while hTBM and hEPCR genes expression was increased in IHCs.
10 gene edit cardiac xenograft survival
Cardiac xenografts with ten gene edits (i.e., GGTA1KO, B4GalNT2, CMAHKO, GHRKO, hTBM, hEPCR, hCD46, hDAF, hCD47, hHO1) were successfully harvested from GE pigs (Sus scrofa) and were preserved with non-ischemic continuous perfusion cardiac preservation (NICP)in the XVIVO© Perfusion system for up to 2 h before orthotopic implantation into adult baboons (Papio anubis). Table 1 describes the exact times of cardiac perfusion in all transplanted animals. All recipient baboons (n = 4) were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, promptly extubated, and without the need for inotropic support after successful life-supporting orthotopic cardiac xenotransplantation (OHTx). With 10-GE donors, NHP recipient survival was 128 ± 36 days (55, 105, 127, and 225 days). This survival was less than previously reported using 7-GE xenografts (10-GE minus CMAHKO, hDAF, and HO-1) but longer than reported using 9-GE xenografts (10-GE minus GHRKO)4 (Fig. 1). Human transgene expression levels of each gene varied in 10-GE donor animals and no correlation was observed with xenograft survival.
Kaplan–Meir survival curve of cardiac xenograft recipients receiving 7, 9, and 10 GE edit donor pigs.
Hematological and immune monitoring of 10 gene edit cardiac xenograft
WBC, hematocrit, and platelet counts are shown in Fig. 2. After an initial drop immediately after surgery, the platelet count recovered. Troponin release was increased as an indicator of myocardial damage for all recipients receiving 10 GE cardiac xenografts but ultimately decreased to a consistent low-level background—similar to prior studies.
Hematology (A) White blood counts (WBC), hematocrit (HCT), platelets, and coagulation parameter of cardiac xenograft recipient receiving from 10GE donor pig.
T and B-cell lymphocytes were depleted with ATG and Rituxan and confirmed by flow cytometry. CD3+ lymphocytes were reconstituted within 48 h of transplantation (Fig. 3A). However, CD20+ lymphocyte depletion lasted for several weeks after induction and did not correlate with increased anti-pig IgG and IgM antibody titers (Fig. 3B). Flow cytometry gating strategy to determine CD3+ and CD20+ has been shown in Supplementary Methods SM1.
A Immunophenotyping of T and B cells. B Non‐Gal IgG and IgM levels; anti‐pig non‐Gal IgG and IgM antibodies levels in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were measured in cardiac xenograft grafts baboon recipient’s serum by flow cytometry using 10GE porcine endothelial cells.
There did not appear to be any significant trends in proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, except in the case of recipient B33500, where acute kidney injury and intra-abdominal sepsis were also present. In this specific case, there was an increase in IL-6, IFN-b, IFN-g, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and IL-10, with notable sparing of IL-1b (Fig. 4).
IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12p40, IL-17, IL-23, IL-1β, IFN-β, IP-10 (CXCL10) levels in the serum of cardiac xenotransplant recipients.
Ultrasonography examination of 10 gene edit cardiac xenograft
Xenograft ejection fraction was preserved similarly to prior orthotopic xenografts (Fig. 5A). Similar to other GHRKO xenografts, as previously published, LV dimensions in diastole, septal, and posterior wall thicknesses stayed relatively stable throughout the post-transplantation course (Fig. 5B). However, LV mass increased in all 10-GE xenografts over time. The most notable increases in LV mass were in those with interstitial cellular infiltrate or artery intimal thickening, similarly seen in prior publications15.
A LV ejection fraction was measured longitudinally after transplantation. B Septal thickness, left ventricular (LV) dimension in end-diastole, relative wall thickness (rWT), posterior wall thickness, LV mass. LV mass percent change was calculated according to the average LV mass in the 30 days after transplantation and 30 days before euthanasia.
Postmortem histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of xenografts
A summary of histopathological findings after explantation is summarized in Tables 2 & 3 and Fig. 6A, B. Recipient B9314 underwent cellular rejection on POD # 55, characterized by mononuclear cellular infiltrate (Fig. 6A.i). B5317 experienced sudden v-fib arrest on POD #127 from a progressive right ventricular outflow gradient seen on echocardiography. This xenograft demonstrated patchy subendocardial necrosis and arterial intimal thickening (Fig. 6A.ii).
A Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining of a section from the explanted heart from the necropsy demonstrating mononuclear cell infiltrate (i), arterial intimal thickening (ii), chronic vasculopathy (iii), and microvascular thrombosis (iv). B Immunohistochemistry of right ventricle (RV) section demonstrating complement (C4d & C3) and immunoglobulin (IgG&IgM) staining.
B32651 experienced a respiratory infection, requiring euthanasia on POD #105. The xenograft was functioning normally, and the final pathology demonstrated arterial intimal thickening without necrosis (Fig. 6A.iii). B33500 was euthanized on POD #225 for acute kidney insufficiency, and on the final autopsy, there was small bowel chronic serositis with granulation tissue and expansion of the submucosa. The xenograft demonstrated patchy myodegeneration and mild microthrombi but an otherwise normal-appearing xenograft (Fig. 6A.iv).
PCMV status of donor animals and its relationship to graft survival
Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) has been shown by other groups to reduce xenograft survival in non-human primates23,24,25. We have retrospectively tested 10-GE cardiac xenografts used in our study by PCR and western blot analysis18. Three out of four cardiac xenografts were found to be positive for PCMV, and their xenograft survivals were 225, 127, and 55 days. One of them (B9314) had demonstrated cellular rejection with evidence of extensive chronic mononuclear infiltrate, and immunostaining of IgG (20%), IgM (10%), and C3, C4d (<5%) antibodies in the capillaries (Fig. 6B). Micro and macrovascular thrombosis was observed in the H&E staining of the explanted xenograft (Fig. 6A). However, despite the presence of PCMV positivity, no viral inclusions were found at the time of necropsy.
The role of CMAH and GHR knockout in 10 gene graft survival
Cumulative anti-pig non-gal antibodies after transplantation in recipients receiving cardiac xenografts from 10GE were higher (Fig. 7A) than in serum from recipients with 7-GE, which do not have CMAHKO (mean normalized MFI for IgG and IgM: 3.6 vs 2.5 and 6.3 vs 3.3 respectively; Unpaired t-test p-value 0.0011 and 0.0002). However, no significant difference in cumulative anti-pig non-gal antibodies after transplantation was found when the recipient received CMAHKO xenograft from both (9-GE and 10-GE). Longitudinally, anti-pig antibodies (IgG and IgM) are shown in Supplementary Fig. S5) after cardiac xenotransplantation. We have also retrospectively analyzed the pre-existing donor-specific anti-pig IgG and IgM antibodies in the baboon recipient before transplantation (−7 days), and no correlation (r2 value 0.46 and 0.36, respectively) was found with 10 GE cardiac xenograft outcomes (Fig. 7B).
A Cumulative mean non-gal anti-pig antibodies (IgG and IgM antibodies) after cardiac xenotransplantation in cardiac xenograft recipients receiving 7, 9, and 10GE donor pig xenograft. B Pre-existing donor-specific anti-pig IgG and IgM antibodies in the baboon recipient before transplantation and cardiac xenograft outcomes.
Discussion
Multi-gene edited donor organs from genetically engineered pigs have improved xenograft survival and have overcome hyperacute and acute xenograft rejection. Several studies, including ours, from heterotopic21,22,26,27,28,29 and life-supporting (orthotopic)4,5,29,30,31 xenotransplantations have demonstrated that iterative and progressive gene edits have yielded prolonged xenograft survival. Recently, we have reported the longest cardiac xenotransplantation from 7-GE pig donors. These included the deletion of two carbohydrate antigens (GGTA1KO, B4GalNT2), i.e., double knockout (DKO), GHR KO, and overexpression of two human anticoagulation (hTBM & hEPCR) proteins, one complement regulatory protein (hCD46), and anti-phagocytosis protein (hCD47). In contrast, 9-GE pigs contain an additional carbohydrate antigen deletion (Neu5Gc, through CMAHKO), but without GHRKO. These did not perform well as the 7-GE recipients in this limited study. Reduced xenograft survival in the recipient from the 9 GE heart may have been attributed to CMAHKO in the xenograft. Cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) gene encodes N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5GcUnlike humans, Old World monkeys (OWM), including baboons, have a functional CMAH gene and so do not have antibodies that bind to anti-Neu5Gc. Exposure to a 10GE inactive CMAH reveals new epitopes, “4th xenoantigen,” and presents new targets for Nab-binding32,33,34. 10-GE also expresses six human transgenes which include complement inhibitors (CD46 & DAF), anticoagulation (EPCR &TBM), anti-phagocytosis/apoptotic (CD47), and anti-inflammatory genes (HO-1). As reported by us earlier, human multi-transgene in genetically engineered pigs appears to confer superior xenograft outcomes and reduce prevailing immediate postoperative xenotransplantation challenges35. In this study, human transgene expression of each gene varied among 10GE donor animals, and they did not correlate with xenograft survival. A larger cohort is needed to elucidate the potential effect of the expression level of each gene on xenograft survival. This investigation is not possible with a limited number of transplants reported here.
Here, we demonstrate the prolonged survival of 10-GE cardiac xenografts in baboons, up to 225 days, which is more than 9-GE but less than 7 GE xenografts. Both 9 and 10 GE xenografts employed deletion of a third carbohydrate antigen (CMAHKO), which may have contributed to the shorter survival. We and others have demonstrated that PAECs from TKO have higher IgM binding than DKO PAECs in NHP serum36,37. Yamamoto et al. have also reported that TKO PAECs have less IgM binding and lower cytotoxicity with human serum than baboons or other old-word monkey serum34.
We have also demonstrated successful cardiac xenotransplantation from 10 GE donor pigs into humans, extending human life to 60 and 40 days1. No hyperacute rejection or increased anti-pig antibodies were detected in these human patients until IVIg treatment was given to one of two patients as a rescue therapy for infections. Later on, lVIg was found to be reactive with PAECs. Porret et al. and Moazami et al. have also reported xenotransplantation of 10 GE porcine grafts to brain-dead decedent humans in separate renal and cardiac transplant experiments. A decedent human recipient who received 10 GE pig hearts survived for up to 66 hours until the termination of the experiment38. None of these studies reported a cellular or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) assessed by conventional histology and flow cytometry, but deeper molecular analysis indicates AMR may have been present39. These studies suggest that 10 GE donor pigs have sufficient gene modifications to prevent hyperacute rejection and human xenotransplantation barriers.
The pig-to-non-human primate (NHP) model is crucial for xenotransplantation, but due to exposure to “4th xenoantigen” arising after CMAH knockout, the NHP model is less than ideal for testing 10GE xenografts. Pre-existing anti-pig antibodies in the recipient may also have contributed to the xenograft outcome. 7 GE xenografts that did not have CMAHKO and their recipients had lower anti-pig IgG and IgM antibodies and survived longer. In our first clinical case, the recipient did not show anti-pig IgG and IgM antibodies until 40 days despite CMAHKO in 10GE pig hearts. These results suggest that CMAHKO grafts may not be very suitable for NHPs.
PCMV is a DNA virus widely distributed in pigs, belongs to the roseolovirus family, and has also shown reduced xenograft survival. It is acquired early in porcine life, and its infection stays lifelong and latent. Some earlier studies have reported a short survival of xenotransplant recipients, and the cause of poor outcomes was attributed to the inadvertent reactivation of pCMV infection23,40. Morozov et al. reported a 29 and 14-day survival of a 3GE heart and GTKO kidney of PCMV-positive pigs, respectively23,41. Denner et al. reported that PCMV reactivation in orthotopic pig heart xenotransplantation was associated with reduced xenograft survival and increased levels of IL-6 and TNFα40. This limited study demonstrates that 10GE heart transplants in baboons survived long-term, irrespective of the donor’s PCMV status, and no difference in the increase of inflammatory cytokines was found, however, a larger cohort is needed to investigate the role of PCMV’s on the xenograft survival. We hypothesize that overexpression of the human inflammatory gene (HO1 and CD47) may have suppressed the effect.
Lastly, the effect of physiologic mismatch between the pig donor heart and the recipient may lead to remodeling of the myocardium (as demonstrated by hypertrophy), and how to address this in our model is controversial. Prior studies have demonstrated support for both blood pressure and heart rate control pharmacologically and by non-pharmacological means5,15,42. This study again demonstrates a lack of graft-limiting hypertrophy, but there is some hypertrophy that peaks at 2 weeks and then plateaus. Further studies need to elucidate the cause from this study and others.
This study demonstrates long-term cardiac xenotransplant survival from 10 GE donor pigs into baboons but also highlights the detrimental effect of CMAHKO on NHP models. However, an additional human gene expression (CD46, TBM, EPCR, hDAF, CD47, and HO-1) may have protected and helped prolong xenograft survival. Therefore, 10GE xenografts might be more suitable for clinical xenotransplantation than in NHPs. Therefore, further human experiments are needed to answer these questions, besides the two human compassionate use cases and decedent model experiments, for demonstrating proof-of-principle.
Data availability
The source data for Fig. 1 is in Supplementary Data 1, the source data for Fig. 2 is in Supplementary Data 2, the source data for Fig. 3 is in Supplementary Data 3, the source data for Fig. 4 is in Supplementary Data 4, the source data for Fig. 4 is in Supplementary Data 5, the source data for Fig. 7 is in Supplementary Data 6, the source data for Supplementary Fig. S2 is in Supplementary Data 7, and the source data for Supplementary Fig. S5 is in Supplementary Data 8,
References
Griffith, B. P. et al. Genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 35–44 (2022).
Neergarard, L. Surgeons Perform Second Pig Heart Transplant, Trying to Save a Dying Man (Associated Press, 2023).
Mohiuddin, M. et al. The second GE pig heart transplant in a living human offers great hope for xenotransplantation. In Amertican Transplnat Congress (ed. Transplantation AJo) (2024).
Mohiuddin, M. M. et al. Progressive genetic modifications of porcine cardiac xenografts extend survival to 9 months. Xenotransplantation 29, e12744 (2022).
Langin, M. et al. Consistent success in life-supporting porcine cardiac xenotransplantation. Nature 564, 430–433 (2018).
Goerlich, C. E., Singh, A. K., Griffith, B. P. & Mohiuddin, M. M. The immunobiology and clinical use of genetically engineered porcine hearts for cardiac xenotransplantation. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 1, 715–726 (2022).
Singireddy, S. et al. Genetic engineering of donor pig for the first human cardiac xenotransplantation: combatting rejection, coagulopathy, inflammation, and excessive growth. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 25, 1649–1656 (2023).
Rose, A. G., Cooper, D. K., Human, P. A., Reichenspurner, H. & Reichart, B. Histopathology of hyperacute rejection of the heart: experimental and clinical observations in allografts and xenografts. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 10, 223–234 (1991).
Mohiuddin, M. M. Clinical xenotransplantation of organs: why aren’t we there yet? PLoS Med. 4, e75 (2007).
Singh, A. K. et al. Cardiac xenotransplantation: progress in preclinical models and prospects for clinical translation. Transpl. Int. 35, 10171 (2022).
Phimister, E. G. Genetic modification in pig-to-human transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 79–82 (2022).
Platt, J. L. & Cascalho, M. The future of transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 77–78 (2022).
Hinrichs, A. et al. Growth hormone receptor knockout to reduce the size of donor pigs for preclinical xenotransplantation studies. Xenotransplantation 28, e12664 (2021).
Iwase, H. et al. Growth hormone receptor knockout: relevance to xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 28, e12652 (2021).
Goerlich, C. E. et al. The growth of xenotransplanted hearts can be reduced with growth hormone receptor knockout pig donors. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 165, e69–81 (2023).
Firl, D. J. et al. Clinical and molecular correlation defines activity of physiological pathways in life-sustaining kidney xenotransplantation. Nat. Commun. 14, 3022 (2023).
Eyestone, W. et al. Gene-edited pigs for xenotransplantation. In Clinical Xenotransplantation (eds Cooper, D. K. C. & Byrne, G.) 121–140 (Springer, 2020).
Mohiuddin, M. M. et al. Graft dysfunction in compassionate use of genetically engineered pig-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation: a case report. Lancet 402, 397–410 (2023).
Goerlich, C. E. et al. A standardized approach to orthotopic (life-supporting) porcine cardiac xenotransplantation in a nonhuman primate model. Transplantation 107, 1718–1728 (2023).
Goerlich, C. E. et al. Blood cardioplegia induction, perfusion storage and graft dysfunction in cardiac xenotransplantation. Front Immunol. 12, 667093 (2021).
Mohiuddin, M. M. et al. Chimeric 2C10R4 anti-CD40 antibody therapy is critical for long-term survival of GTKO.hCD46.hTBM pig-to-primate cardiac xenograft. Nat. Commun. 7, 11138 (2016).
Mohiuddin, M. M. et al. B-cell depletion extends the survival of GTKO.hCD46Tg pig heart xenografts in baboons for up to 8 months. Am. J. Transpl. 12, 763–771 (2012).
Yamada, K. et al. Porcine cytomegalovirus infection is associated with early rejection of kidney grafts in a pig to baboon xenotransplantation model. Transplantation 98, 411–418 (2014).
Mueller, N. J. & Denner, J. Porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV): a threat for xenotransplantation? Xenotransplantation 29, e12775 (2022).
Fiebig, U. et al. Distribution of porcine cytomegalovirus in infected donor pigs and in baboon recipients of pig heart transplantation. Viruses 10, 66 (2018).
Iwase, H. et al. Pig-to-baboon heterotopic heart transplantation–exploratory preliminary experience with pigs transgenic for human thrombomodulin and comparison of three costimulation blockade-based regimens. Xenotransplantation 22, 211–220 (2015).
Kuwaki, K. et al. Heart transplantation in baboons using alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs as donors: initial experience. Nat. Med. 11, 29–31 (2005).
Mohiuddin, M. M. et al. Genetically engineered pigs and target-specific immunomodulation provide significant graft survival and hope for clinical cardiac xenotransplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 148, 1106–1113 (2014).
Singh, A. K., Griffith, B. P., Goerlich, C. E., Ayares, D. & Mohiuddin, M. M. The road to the first FDA-approved genetically engineered pig heart transplantation into human. Xenotransplantation 29, e12776 (2022).
Iwase, H. et al. Pig kidney graft survival in a baboon for 136 days: longest life-supporting organ graft survival to date. Xenotransplantation 22, 302–309 (2015).
McGregor, C. G. et al. Recovery of cardiac function after pig-to-primate orthotopic heart transplant. Am. J. Transplant. 8, 205–206 (2008).
Estrada, J. L. et al. Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/beta4GalNT2 genes. Xenotransplantation 22, 194–202 (2015).
Li, Q. et al. Carbohydrate antigen expression and anti-pig antibodies in New World capuchin monkeys: relevance to studies of xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 26, e12498 (2019).
Yamamoto, T. et al. Old World Monkeys are less than ideal transplantation models for testing pig organs lacking three carbohydrate antigens (Triple-Knockout). Sci. Rep. 10, 9771 (2020).
Chan, J. L. et al. Encouraging experience using multi-transgenic xenografts in a pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantation model. Xenotransplantation 24, https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.12330 (2017).
Hara, H., Yamamoto, T., Wei, H. J. & Cooper, D. K. C. What have we learned from in vitro studies about pig-to-primate organ transplantation? Transplantation 107, 1265–1277 (2022).
Lin, S. S. et al. The role of antibodies in acute vascular rejection of pig-to-baboon cardiac transplants. J. Clin. Investig. 101, 1745–1756 (1998).
Porrett, P. M. et al. First clinical-grade porcine kidney xenotransplant using a human decedent model. Am. J. Transpl. 22, 1037–1053 (2022).
Loupy, A. et al. Immune response after pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation: a multimodal phenotyping study. Lancet 402, 1158–1169 (2023).
Denner, J. et al. Impact of porcine cytomegalovirus on long-term orthotopic cardiac xenotransplant survival. Sci. Rep. 10, 17531 (2020).
Morozov, V. A. Active replication of porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) following transplantation of a pig heart into a baboon despite undetected virus in the donor pig. Ann. Virol. Res. 2, 1018 (2016).
Langin, M. et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of anesthetized baboons and piglets by transpulmonary thermodilution: Normal values and interspecies differences with respect to xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 27, e12576 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank our core laboratories, including the University of Maryland School of Medicine Center for Innovative Biomedical Resources (CIBR), Veterinary Resources, and Flow Cytometry Facility (FCC). We thank Ms Patricia Jackson for her administrative help. We thank Revivicor, Inc. for providing donor pigs, and financial support from United Therapeutics. Funding for this study is generously provided by public funding-NIAID/NIH U19 AI090959 “Genetically-engineered Pig Organ Transplantation into Non-Human Primates” and private funding by United Therapeutics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.S., C.G., B.G., and M.M. designed, and supervised the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the paper. C.G., B.G., M.M., T.Z., and A.G. contributed to surgical procedures and collected the data. P.O., E.S., and B.W. contributed to anesthesia procedures during the surgery. A.S., A.H., G.B., and K.K. contributed to in vitro experiments and molecular assays. B.L., F.S., and S.M. contributed to day-to-day animal care. D.A. provided the genetically engineered pigs. K.R., A.B., and C.B.D. analyzed and interpreted histology slides.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All other authors except K.K. and D.A. declare no competing interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article. K.K. and D.A. are employees of Revivicor Inc., Blacksburg, VA, USA, and got a salary, as part of the data acquisition for this study but their role could not have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Medicine thanks Christoph Knosalla and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: [EBM name(s)] and [Internal Editor name(s)]. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, A.K., Goerlich, C.E., Zhang, T. et al. Genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in non-human primates. Commun Med 5, 6 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00731-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00731-y
- Springer Nature Limited








