Abstract
Size is a fundamental quantity of magnetic skyrmions. A magnetic skyrmion can be a local circular object and in an isolated form. A skyrmion can also coexist with a group of its siblings in a condensed phase. Each skyrmion in a condensed phase takes a stripe shape at low skyrmion density and a circular shape at high skyrmion density. Skyrmions at high density form a skyrmion crystal (SkX). So far, skyrmion size in an SkX has not been seriously studied. Here, by using a generic chiral magnetic film, it is found that skyrmion size in an SkX has a different parameter dependence as those for isolated skyrmions and stripes. A size formula and a good spin profile for skyrmions in SkXs are proposed. These findings have important implications in searching for stable smaller skyrmions at the room temperature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Magnetic skyrmions, topological spin structures that have non-zero skyrmion number of \(Q=\frac{1}{4\pi }\iint {{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}\cdot ({\partial }_{{{{\rm{x}}}}}{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}\times {\partial }_{{{{\rm{y}}}}}{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}})\ {{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}x{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}y\), where m is the unit vector of magnetization, have received intensive and extensive studies in magnetics for their academic interest and promising applications in information technology1,2,3,4,5. These studies include skyrmion formation and creation6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, skyrmion imaging16,17,18,19,20, skyrmion manipulation13,14,15,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, and skyrmion dynamics28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35. Our knowledge about magnetic skyrmions has been greatly advanced in recent years4,36,37. It is known34 that the size of isolated skyrmions increases with the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) strength, and decreases with the exchange stiffness coefficient and magnetic anisotropy27,34. Recently, we unambiguously showed that various stripes observed in helical phase in chiral magnetic films are spin textures of skyrmion number 136. The stripe width36 increases with exchange stiffness coefficient and decreases with the DMI strength. Many fundamental properties of skyrmions are inadequately known despite of all those advances4. The underlying physics of isolated skyrmions and skyrmion crystals (SkXs) is different, but people do not distinguish the size of an isolated skyrmion from the ones in an SkX to date. How skyrmion size in SkXs depends on material parameters is an unsolved problem.
In this paper, a generic chiral magnetic film with exchange stiffness constant A, the DMI strength D, and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy K is used to show that κ ≡ π2D2/(16AK) = 1 separates isolated skyrmions (κ < 1) from condensed skyrmion states (κ > 1). In contrast to isolated skyrmions whose size increases with D/K and is insensitive to κ ≪ 1 and stripes whose width increases with A/D and is insensitive to κ ≫ 1, the skyrmion size in SkXs is inversely proportional to the square root of skyrmion number density and decreases with A/D. This finding provides general guidance for skyrmion size manipulation.
Results
Model
A two-dimensional (2D) chiral magnetic film of thickness d in the xy-plane is modelled by the following energy
where Ku, Ms, μ0, and Hd are perpendicular uniaxial crystalline anisotropy constant, the saturation magnetization, the vacuum permeability and demagnetization field, respectively. The energy is set to zero, E = 0, for ferromagnetic state of ∣mz∣ = 1. In a theoretical analysis, the demagnetization effect can be included through the effective perpendicular anisotropy constant \(K={K}_{{{{{{\rm{u}}}}}}}-{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{2}/2\). This is a good approximation when the film thickness d is much smaller than the exchange length34. Films with κ ≡ π2D2/(16AK) < 1 support isolated skyrmions that are metastable spin textures of energy \(8\pi {{{\rm{Ad}}}}\sqrt{1-\kappa }\)34.
Demagnetization field as an effective anisotropy
In order to prove that demagnetization field can accurately be included in the effective anisotropy \(K={K}_{{{{{{\rm{u}}}}}}}-{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{2}/2\) even for highly inhomogeneous spin structures, we consider a 300 nm × 300 nm × 0.4 nm film with A = 10 pJ m−1, D = 6 mJ m−2, \(K={K}_{{{{{{\rm{u}}}}}}}-{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{2}/2=0.7\ {{{{{\rm{MJ}}}}}}\ {{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-3}\), Ms = 0.58 MA m−1. Starting from a nucleation domain of 10 nm in diameter and under the dynamics of the LLG equation, a stable ramified stripe has the same skyrmion number as an isolated skyrmion or a skyrmion in an SkX, (see “Methods” section). The stable ramified stripe from MuMax3 is presented in Fig. 1a. In MuMax338 simulations, the unit-cell size is 1 nm × 1 nm × 0.4 nm. The black and red dots (90,000 in total) in Fig. 1b denote the crystalline anisotropy energy Ea and the sum of the anisotropy and demagnetization energies Ea + Ed for each cell from an MuMax3 simulation, respectively. Data are sorted by mz. The blue curve is the effective anisotropy energy \({E}_{{{{{{\rm{a,eff}}}}}}}=V\left({K}_{{{{{{\rm{u}}}}}}}-\frac{1}{2}{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{2}\right)(1-{m}_{{{{\rm{z}}}}}^{2})+\frac{1}{2}V{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{2}\), where V is the volume of each cell. The red dots are almost on the blue curve, demonstrating the excellence of the approximation.
Phase diagram of an isolated skyrmion and a ramified stripe
Figure 2 a plots the energy of one skyrmion in chiral magnets as a function of κ. The squares and diamonds, circles and stars, up-triangles and pentagons, are respectively from three groups of model parameters listed in “Methods” section. E is plotted in \({{{{{\rm{arcsinh}}}}}}(E)\) scale because E covers a huge range of values on both sides of zero, and κ is in \({{{{\mathrm{log}}}}}\,(\kappa )\) scale. Clearly, κ = 1 separates metastable isolated skyrmions from ramified stripes36.
a Energy (in \({{{{{\rm{arcsinh}}}}}}(E)\) scale) as a function of κ ≡ π2D2/(16AK) (in \({{{{\mathrm{log}}}}}\,(\kappa )\) scale) for various model parameters with very different exchange stiffness constant A, the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction coefficient D, and the effective perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant K. E changes sign at κ = 1 that separate an isolated skyrmion from stripes and skyrmion crystals. b mz(r) is the z-component of magnetization at position r measured from the centre of an isolated skyrmion shown in the inset. Symbols are simulation data and the solid curve are theoretical fit with skyrmion size R = 4.513 nm and skyrmion wall width w = 1.356 nm. c Spin profile mz(x) of a stripe. Symbols are simulation data for stripes ①–④ in the inset and the solid curve is the theoretical fit with stripe width L = 8.95 nm and stripe wall width w = 1.82 nm. x is measured across the stripes and x = 0 is at the stripe centres.
For a better comparison, earlier results on spin profile of isolated skyrmions and stripes are summarized first. The spin profile of isolated skyrmions can be approximated by \({{\Theta }}(r)=2\arctan \left[\frac{\sinh (r/w)}{\sinh (R/w)}\right]\)34. Θ is the polar angle of the magnetization at position r measured from the center of a skyrmion where mz = 1. R and w measure respectively the skyrmion size and skyrmion wall thickness. Figure 2b shows the excellent agreement between the theoretical spin profile (the solid curve) with R = 4.513 nm and w = 1.356 nm with numerical simulations from MuMax3 (the symbols) for an isolated skyrmion. Model parameters are A = 0.4 pJ m−1, D = 0.15 mJ m−2, Ku = 0.214 MJ m−3 (K = 0.2 MJ m−3), Ms = 0.15 MA m−1. The inset shows the skyrmion structure. This profile leads to the skyrmion size formula of \(R=w/\sqrt{1-\kappa }\) and w = πD/(4K)34.
The spin profile of stripes can be approximated by \({{\Theta }}(x)=2\arctan \left[\frac{\sinh (L/2w)}{\sinh (| x| /w)}\right]\) for mz < 0 and \({{\Theta }}(x)=2\arctan \left[\frac{\sinh (| x| /w)}{\sinh (L/2w)}\right]\) for mz > 036. x is measured across a stripe and x = 0 is at the stripe centre (mz = 1). L is the stripe width that is the distance between two parallel contour lines of mz = 0. w measures skyrmion wall thickness. Figure 2c is spin profile of stripes with model parameters of A = 0.3 pJ m−1, D = 0.24 mJ m−2, Ku = 0.110 MJ m−3 (K = 0.096 MJ m−3), Ms = 0.15 MA m−1. The symbols are the numerical data from various locations of stripes shown in the inset and the solid curve is the theoretical fit with L = 8.95 nm and w = 1.82 nm. The excellent agreements between the numerical data and the approximate profiles demonstrate that one can use this theoretical profile to extract the skyrmion size accurately. Data from different stripes, falling on the same curve, demonstrate that stripes, building blocks of irregular spin textures of skyrmion number 1, are identical. The stripe profile leads to the stripe width formula of L = g(κ)A/D, where g(κ) is about 2π for κ ≫ 136, opposite dependence on D as that for an isolated skyrmion.
From an earlier study36, it is known that skyrmion–skyrmion interaction is important in SkX formation unlike isolated skyrmions and stripes that do not rely on the interaction. Thus, one should expect a different spin profile and parameter dependence of skyrmion size for an SkX. This is the main issue in this study.
SkX and spin profile
In order to study skyrmions in SkXs, we consider model parameters satisfying κ > 1 below. All initial configurations have sufficient number of nucleation domains in triangular lattices. Each domain of mz = 1 is a disk of 10 nm in diameter. Each initial configuration leads to an SkX in a triangular lattice as shown in Fig. 3a–c respectively with 324, 400, and 484 skyrmions in a film of 400 nm × 346 nm × 1 nm. The model parameters are A = 5 pJ m−1, D = 3 mJ m−2, Ku = 30 kJ m−3 (K = 4.88 kJ m−3), Ms = 0.2 MA m−1. Figure 3a–c show that the areas of mz > 0 and mz < 0 are different, and have different spin distribution. Lattice constant and skyrmion size are two obvious length scales. A new spin profile of \({{\Theta }}(r)=2\arctan \left\{\frac{\tan \left[\frac{\pi }{2}\cos (\frac{\pi R}{L})\right]}{\tan \left[\frac{\pi }{2}\cos (\frac{\pi r}{L})\right]}\right\}\) along three triangular lattice directions, (1,0), (1/2, \(\sqrt{3}/2\)), and (1/2, \(-\sqrt{3}/2\)), is proposed, where r labels the points on the yellow lines in Fig. 3a–c with r = 0 being the centre of a chosen skyrmion. R and L are respectively the skyrmion size (the radius of mz = 0 contour) and the lattice constant. L relates to skyrmion number density n of an SkX in a triangular lattice as \(L\approx 1.07/\sqrt{n}=22.11\ \) nm for Fig. 3a, 19.90 nm for Fig. 3b, and 18.09 nm for Fig. 3c, where n is defined as the total skyrmion number divided by the total film area. Figure 3d–f are mz(r) along the yellow lines in Fig. 3a–c, respectively. Symbols are numerical data from MuMax3 simulations while the curves are \({m}_{{{{\rm{z}}}}}(r)=\cos {{\Theta }}\) with fitting parameter R = 7.042 nm for Fig. 3d, 6.144 nm for Fig. 3e, 5.399 nm for Fig. 3f. R depends only on n, A/D, and κ. Numerical evidences of this claim is given in Supplementary Note 1.
a–c Spin configurations of skyrmion crystals with skyrmion density n = 2.34 × 10−3 nm−2 (a), 2.89 × 10−3nm−2 (b), and 3.50 × 10−3nm−2 (c). mz is the z-component of magnetization. d–f Spin profiles mz(r) along the yellow lines in (a–c), respectively. The symbols are numerical data and the solid lines are the theoretical fits with skyrmion size R = 7.042 nm (d), 6.144 nm (e), and 5.399 nm (f).
Skyrmion size in SkXs
If energy per skyrmion in an SkX is from a skyrmion whose spin texture is described by Θ(r) for 0 ≤ r ≤ L/2, then energy per skyrmion can be expressed as a function of variable R,
where \(\varepsilon =\frac{2R}{L}\), fi(x) (i = 1, 2, 3) are defined in the “Methods” section. The skyrmion size is then the solution of \(\frac{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}E}{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}R}=0\). Under certain reasonable assumptions (see Supplementary Note 2), one has
Unlike stripe width that does not depend on n and increases with A/D, Eq. (3) says that R is almost inversely proportional to \(\sqrt{n}\) and decreases with A/D. The interesting dependences agree with the underlying physics of SkXs that result from the balance of skyrmion–skyrmion repulsion and intrinsic stripe nature of skyrmions. R should then be proportional to the lattice constant of an SkX that is the skyrmion–skyrmion distance and, in turn, is inversely proportional to \(\sqrt{n}\). Since skyrmions in an SkX come from the squeeze of stripe skyrmions, the amount of width deduction from the squeeze should be proportional to the original stripe width proportional to A/D. Thus, R should not only be smaller than the natural stripe width, but also decreases with A/D as what Eq. (3) says. Of course, one should not expect coefficients of \(1/\sqrt{n}\) and A/D to be very accurate because the obvious approximations involved. For example, it is impossible to fill a plane by disks of radius L/2. Eq. (2) completely neglects energy from unfilled regions although their contributions are very small (because of mz ≃ −1 there).
We carried out MuMax3 simulations with very different n, A, D, K in three different parameter regions. For each fixed parameters, skyrmion size R in the corresponding SkX can be obtained either from the size of mz = 0 contour or through fitting of numerical spin profile to the new spin profile. The difference between two extracted values is negligible (see Supplementary Fig. 1), and all data shown below is from contour measurement. One can test our theoretical predictions of Eq. (3) against numerical simulations. As mentioned above, simulations show that R depends only on n, A/D, and κ. Figure 4a plots R vs. \(1/\sqrt{n}\) for various fixed A/D and κ from three groups of model parameters. Simulation results (the symbols) are well described by our formula (the solid curves) of Eq. (3) without any fitting parameter. R is almost linear in \(1/\sqrt{n}\). The A/D dependence and κ dependence of R can also be well captured by Eq. (3) as shown by good agreement between simulation data (the symbols) and theoretical formula of Eq. (3) (the solid curve) in Fig. 4b (A/D) and Fig. 4c (κ), respectively. Equation (3) says that R does not depend on anisotropy K for κ ≫ 1. Our new spin profile captures successfully the skyrmion–skyrmion repulsion effect that requires R to be proportional to the lattice constant, the inverse of the skyrmion number density n.
Skyrmion size in skyrmion crystals as a function of skyrmion number density n for various A/D and fixed κ (a); as a function of A/D for various fixed n and κ (b), and as a function of κ for various n and A/D (c). A is exchange stiffness constant, D is the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction coefficient D, and κ ≡ π2D2/(16AK), where K is the effective perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. The symbols are numerical data from MuMax3 simulations. The solid curves are the formula of Eq. (3).
Discussion
Although most previous studies39,40,41 investigate the lattice constant of SkXs rather than skyrmion size in an SkX, ref. 42 measured experimentally the skyrmion size of FeGe film. Parameters of FeGe are A ~ 18 pJ m−1, D ~ 2.8 mJ m−2, K ~ 0.01 MJ m−343, skyrmion number density in ref. 42 is around 209 μm−2 [estimated from Fig. 2h in ref. 42]. Thus, according to our theory, the skyrmion size should be around 22.7 nm that agrees well with the measured value of ~21 nm [estimated from Fig. 2h in ref. 42]. One should also note that the presence of magnetic field can also affect the size of skyrmions that explains the small discrepancy.
According to the current results, magnetic skyrmions can be isolated, or condensed regular or irregular stripes distributed randomly or arranged as helical states of one-dimensional stripe lattices, or condensed circular skyrmions in crystal forms. The irregular stripes can even be in ramified, or in dendrite or maze forms36. The underlying physics of skyrmion size are different for isolated skyrmions, stripes in different morphologies and structures, and skyrmions in an SkX. It is known that skyrmion formation energies are positive for isolated skyrmions and negative (with respect to the energy of a ferromagentic state) for stripes and SkXs. Positive formation energy results in an extra energy for skyrmion surfaces, similar to the surface tension of a liquid droplet, that favours a circular shape. Negative skyrmion formation energy is similar to a negative surface tension of a liquid droplet that prefers to wet its contacts and to spread out. From this viewpoint, it may not be surprising to see different parameter dependences of skyrmion size for isolated skyrmions and skyrmions in SkXs or stripes, each with skyrmion number 1. It is also not surprising that spin profile of skyrmions in SkXs has little similarity to those of isolated skyrmions and stripes because their shape comes from the balance of the skyrmion squeeze and their stripe nature. Two nearby skyrmions start to repel each other when their distance is order of L ≈ 13A/D. Thus, the critical skyrmion number density for SkX formation is about nc ≈ D2/(169A2). For n > nc, skyrmions tend to form a closely packed triangular lattice of lattice constant \(1.07/\sqrt{n}\). The skyrmion squeeze leads to Eq. (3) in which skyrmion size decreases with A/D, opposite to the parameter dependence of the width of stripe skyrmions. There is a maximal skyrmion number density beyond which an SkX is not stable any more. The physics around the maximal skyrmion number density surely deserves a study, but it is not an issue in this work.
In applications, creating stable skyrmions of smaller size at the room temperature is a goal. According to current results, one needs to distinguish an isolated skyrmion (κ < 1) from a skyrmion in a condensed skyrmion phase (κ > 1). In the case of κ < 1, materials with large A and smaller D are preferred since larger A and smaller D imply a higher Tc and smaller skyrmion size. On the other hand, in the case of κ > 1, materials with larger A and larger D are required so that one may have both higher Tc and smaller skyrmion size. Interestingly, the same critical value of κ = 1 was also obtained by many people from comparing energy difference between a one-dimensional magnetic domain wall and the ferromagnetic state8,28,44,45.
In conclusion, material parameter dependences of skyrmion size are very different for circular isolated skyrmions, stripes, and circular skyrmions in SkXs. Unlike an isolated skyrmion whose size increases with D/K and κ < 1, or a stripe whose size increases with A/D and decreases with κ > 1, the size of a circular skyrmion in SkXs is inversely proportional to the square root of skyrmion number density and decreases with A/D. Skyrmion size is a very important quantity, and high-density data storage requires, in general, smaller skyrmions. The findings here provide a practical guidance for searching proper materials in different applications.
Methods
Numerical simulations
The dynamics of m is governed by the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert (LLG) equation,
where γ and α are respectively gyromagnetic ratio and the Gilbert damping constant. The effective magnetic field \({{{{{{\bf{H}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{eff}}}}}}}=\frac{2A}{{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}}{\nabla }^{2}{{{{{\bf{m}}}}}}+\frac{2{K}_{{{{{{\rm{u}}}}}}}}{{\mu }_{0}{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}}{m}_{{{{\rm{z}}}}}\hat{z}+{{{{{{\bf{H}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{H}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{DM}}}}}}}\) includes the exchange field, the crystalline magnetic anisotropy field, the demagnetization field Hd, and the DMI field HDM respectively.
Previous studies36,37 demonstrate that a small nucleation domain of mz = 1 in the background of ferromagnetic phase of mz = − 1 can develop into a skyrmion in a chiral magnetic film. In the absence of energy source such as an electric current and at zero temperature, the LLG equation describes a dissipative system whose energy can only decrease46,47. Thus, the long-time solution of the LLG equation with any initial configuration must be a stable steady spin texture of Hamiltonian Eq. (1). α does not change the stable steady spin structures of the LLG equation. However, α can change spin dynamics and which stable spin texture to pick because the evolution path and energy dissipation rate depend on damping. This is similar to the sensitiveness of attractor basins to the damping in a macro spin system48. In this work, we use a large α = 0.25 to speed up our simulations.
In this study, we choose three groups of model parameters to simulate those chiral magnets of MnSi with A = 0.27–0.4 pJ m−1, D = 0.15–0.33 mJ m−2, Ku = 0.02–0.2 MJ m−3, Ms = 0.15–0.5 MA m−121; Co–Zn–Mn with A = 5–11 pJ m−1, D = 0.5–2 mJ m−2, Ku = 20–80 kJ m−3, Ms = 0.15–0.35 MA m−129; and PdFe/Ir and W/Co20Fe60B20/MgO1,2,13,15,22,23,25 with A = 2–10 pJ m−1, D = 0.68–4 mJ m−2, Ku = 228–2500 kJ m−3, Ms = 650–1160 kA m−1. Periodic boundary conditions are used to eliminate boundary effects and the MuMax3 package38 is employed to numerically solve the LLG equation with mesh size of 1 nm × 1 nm × 1 nm.
To obtain the energy of one static isolated skyrmion or one static ramified stripe, we start with one small domain of mz = 1 of 10 nm in diameter. After a few nanoseconds, one can obtain a stable steady spin structure as well as quantities like Q and E from MuMax3 simulator.
In order to obtain an SkX, many small domains of mz = 1 of 10 nm in diameter each are initially arranged in a triangular lattice in the background of mz = −1. Under the dynamics of the LLG equation, each small domain of zero skyrmion number becomes a skyrmion of Q = 1. For each giving n > nc, an SkX in triangular lattice is obtained. We can obtain SkXs with different density n by varying the number of domains in a film of a fixed-size.
Derivation of energy expressions
Substituting new spin profile Θ(r) into Eq. (1) and in the absence of an external field, energy per skyrmion E(R) consists of exchange Eex, DMI EDM, and anisotropy Ean energies
where ξ = 2r/L, \(\varepsilon =\frac{2R}{L}\), \(f(\varepsilon )=\tan \left[\frac{\pi }{2}\cos (\frac{\pi }{2}\varepsilon )\right]\). One can obtain Eq. (2) by suming up the three energies. Skyrmion size R is the solution of \(\frac{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}E(R)}{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}R}=0\), or
where \({f}_{{{{\rm{i}}}}}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )\) denotes derivatives of fi(ε) (i = 1, 2, 3) with respect to ε. Since \({f}_{2}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )\) are non-zero in ε ∈ (0, 1), one can divide Eq. (8) by \(D{f}_{2}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )\) to have
where \({p}_{1}(\varepsilon )={f}_{1}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )/{f}_{2}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )\) and \({p}_{2}(\varepsilon )={f}_{3}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )/{f}_{2}^{\prime}(\varepsilon )\). p1 and p2 can be approximated by two analytical functions.
and
Thus one has
\(\frac{{\pi }^{2}DL}{16A}{p}_{2}(\varepsilon )\frac{1}{\kappa }\) in the denominator is very small for ε > 0.5. Replacing p2(ε) by p2(0.5), skyrmion size R, is then Eq.(3).
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 152 (2013).
Sampaio, J., Cros, V., Rohart, S., Thiaville, A. & Fert, A. Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839 (2013).
Krause, S. & Wiesendanger, R. Spintronics: skyrmionics gets hot. Nat. Mater. 15, 493–494 (2016).
Back, C. et al. The 2020 skyrmionics roadmap. J. Phys. D 53, 363001 (2020).
Litzius, K. & Kläui, M. in Magnetic Skyrmions and Their Applications (eds. Finocchio, G. & Panagopoulos, C.) (Woodhead Publishing, 2021).
Rößler, U. K., Bogdanov, A. N. & Pfleiderer, C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 442, 797–801 (2006).
Heinze, S. et al. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 7, 713–718 (2011).
Rohart, S. & Thiaville, A. Skyrmion confinement in ultrathin film nanostructures in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 88, 184422 (2013).
Zhou, Y. & Ezawa, M. A. Reversible conversion between a skyrmion and a domain-wall pair in a junction geometry. Nat. Commun. 5, 4652 (2014).
Du, H. et al. Edge-mediated skyrmion chain and its collective dynamics in a confined geometry. Nat. Commun. 6, 8504 (2015).
Yuan, H. Y. & Wang, X. R. Skyrmion creation and manipulation by nano-second current pulses. Sci. Rep. 6, 22638 (2016).
Dürrenfeld, P., Xu, Y., Åkerman, J. & Zhou, Y. Controlled skyrmion nucleation in extended magnetic layers using a nanocontact geometry. Phys. Rev. B 96, 054430 (2017).
Romming, N. et al. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 341, 636–639 (2013).
Li, J. et al. Tailoring the topology of an artificial magnetic skyrmion. Nat. Commun. 5, 4704 (2014).
Jiang, W. et al. Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles. Science 349, 283 (2015).
Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).
Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010).
Onose, Y., Okamura, Y., Seki, S., Ishiwata, S. & Tokura, Y. Observation of magnetic excitations of skyrmion crystal in a helimagnetic insulator Cu2 OSeO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 037603 (2012).
Park, H. S. et al. Observation of the magnetic flux and three-dimensional structure of skyrmion lattices by electron holography. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 337 (2014).
Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 15, 501–506 (2016).
Karhu, E. A. et al. Chiral modulations and reorientation effects in MnSi thin films. Phys. Rev. B 85, 094429 (2012).
Jaiswal, S. et al. Investigation of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and room temperature skyrmions in W/CoFeB/MgO thin films and microwires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 022409 (2017).
Simon, E., Palotás, K., Rózsa, L., Udvardi, L. & Szunyogh, L. Formation of magnetic skyrmions with tunable properties in PdFe bilayer deposited on Ir(111). Phys. Rev. B 90, 094410 (2014).
Kong, L. & Zang, J. Dynamics of an insulating Skyrmion under a temperature gradient. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 067203 (2013).
Romming, N., Kubetzka, A., Hanneken, C., von Bergmann, K. & Wiesendanger, R. Field-dependent size and shape of single magnetic Skyrmions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 177203 (2015).
Siemens, A., Zhang, Y., Hagemeister, J., Vedmedenko, E. Y. & Wiesendanger, R. Minimal radius of magnetic skyrmions: statics and dynamics. N. J. Phys. 18, 045021 (2016).
Cortés-Ortuño, D. et al. Nanoscale magnetic skyrmions and target states in confined geometries. Phys. Rev. B 99, 214408 (2019).
Wilson, M. N., Butenko, A. B., Bogdanov, A. N. & Monchesky, T. L. Chiral skyrmions in cubic helimagnet films: the role of uniaxial anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094411 (2014).
Ukleev, V. et al. Element-specific soft x-ray spectroscopy, scattering, and imaging studies of the skyrmion-hosting compound Co8 Zn8 Mn4. Phys. Rev. B 99, 144408 (2019).
Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets. Nat. Commun. 4, 1463 (2013).
Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013).
Yuan, H. Y., Wang, X. S., Yung, M. H. & Wang, X. R. Wiggling skyrmion propagation under parametric pumping. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014428 (2019).
Gong, X., Yuan, H. Y. & Wang, X. R. Current-driven skyrmion motion in granular films. Phys. Rev. B 101, 064421 (2020).
Wang, X. S., Yuan, H. Y. & Wang, X. R. A theory on skyrmion size. Commun. Phys. 1, 31 (2018).
Khoshlahni, R., Qaiumzadeh, A., Bergman, A. & Brataas, A. Ultrafast generation and dynamics of isolated skyrmions in antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B 99, 054423 (2019).
Wang, X. R., Hu, X. C. & Wu, H. T. Stripe skyrmions and skyrmion crystals. Commun. Phys. 4, 142 (2021).
Hu, X. C., Wu, H. T. & Wang, X. R. A generic theory of skyrmion crystal formation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10104v2.
Vansteenkiste, A. et al. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP. Adv. 4, 107133 (2014).
Balkind, E., Isidori, A. & Eschrig, M. Magnetic skyrmion lattice by the Fourier transform method. Phys. Rev. B 99, 134446 (2019).
Teixeira, A. W. et al. Motion-induced inertial effects and topological phase transitions in skyrmion transport. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 265403 (2021).
Yang, C.-C., Jian, Z.-A., Chen, Y.-J. & Chen, Y.-Y. Effect of size on magnetic properties of NdMn2 O5 nanorods. IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1 (2014).
McGrouther, D. et al. Internal structure of hexagonal skyrmion lattices in cubic helimagnets. N. J. Phys. 18, 095004 (2016).
Takagi, R. et al. Spin-wave spectroscopy of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in room-temperature chiral magnets hosting skyrmions. Phys. Rev. B 95, 220406(R) (2017).
Leonov, A. O. et al. The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films. N. J. Phys. 18, 065003 (2016).
Bogdanov, A. & Hubert, A. Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 138, 255–269 (1994).
Wang, X. R., Yan, P., Lu, J. & He, C. Magnetic field driven domain-wall propagation in magnetic nanowires. Ann. Phys. 324, 1815 (2009).
Wang, X. R., Yan, P. & Lu, J. High-field domain wall propagation velocity in magnetic nanowires. Europhys. Lett. 86, 67001 (2009).
Sun, Z. Z. & Wang, X. R. Fast magnetization switching of Stoner particles: a nonlinear dynamics picture. Phys. Rev. B 71, 174430 (2005).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2020YFA0309600 and 2018YFB0407600), the NSFC Grant (No. 11974296 and 11774296) and Hong Kong RGC Grants (No. 16301518, 16301619, and 16302321).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.R. Wang planned the project and wrote the manuscript. H.T. Wu, X.C. Hu and K.Y. Jing performed theoretical calculations and numerical simulations, and prepared the figures. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests. X. R. Wang is an Editorial Board Member for Communications Physics, but was not involved in the editorial review of, or the decision to publish this article.
Additional information
Peer review information Communications Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Hu, X., Jing, K. et al. Size and profile of skyrmions in skyrmion crystals. Commun Phys 4, 210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00716-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00716-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Spin-wave-driven tornado-like dynamics of three-dimensional topological magnetic textures
Communications Physics (2024)
-
All-optical control of skyrmion configuration in CrI\(_3\) monolayer
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Advancing space-based gravitational wave astronomy: Rapid parameter estimation via normalizing flows
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2024)
-
Probing dark matter spikes via gravitational waves of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2022)
-
Nematic and smectic stripe phases and stripe-SkX transformations
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2022)