Abstract
Light-matter interaction in optomechanical systems is the foundation for ultra-sensitive detection schemes as well as the generation of phononic and photonic quantum states. Electromechanical systems realize this optomechanical interaction in the microwave regime. In this context, capacitive coupling arrangements demonstrated interaction rates of up to 280 Hz. Complementary, early proposals and experiments suggest that inductive coupling schemes are tunable and have the potential to reach the single-photon strong-coupling regime. Here, we follow the latter approach by integrating a partly suspended superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) into a microwave resonator. The mechanical displacement translates into a time varying flux in the SQUID loop, thereby providing an inductive electromechanical coupling. We demonstrate a sideband-resolved electromechanical system with a tunable vacuum coupling rate of up to 1.62 kHz, realizing sub-aN Hz−1/2 force sensitivities. The presented inductive coupling scheme shows the high potential of SQUID-based electromechanics for targeting the full wealth of the intrinsically nonlinear optomechanics Hamiltonian.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Designing, investigating, and understanding the optomechanical interaction plays a key role in tailoring the light-matter interaction and hence for testing quantum mechanics1,2,3,4. In addition, optomechanics is also the basis for detection schemes with extreme sensitivity used in gravitational wave detection5, mechanical sensing6 as well as the creation of mechanical quantum states7,8. This potential triggered a multitude of realizations of optomechanical systems4,9 including systems based on superconducting circuits, which define the field of nano-electromechanics10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Here, the photonic cavity is implemented as a microwave resonator and the electromechanical interaction is typically realized using a mechanically compliant capacitance, which transfers a mechanical displacement into a change of the resonance frequency of the microwave circuit10,11,12,13,14,17. It was proposed early on that inductive coupling schemes can allow for higher coupling rates than capacitive ones18,19,20,21.
SQUID tunable microwave resonators can be designed to realize qubits or effective two-level systems22,23. In this context, electromechanical interactions have also been studied15,24,25,26,27 enabling large optomechanical couplings with the potential to realize quantum interference of massive objects’ trajectories28. In addition, they provide a route to implement even more complex coupled quantum systems, which, e.g., allow to create photon–phonon entanglement, phonon Fock state generation, and three partite entanglement29,30,31. However, these systems employ the effective two-level character and hence go beyond the traditional optomechanical system.
Only recently, an electromechanical coupling on-par with capacitive approaches was demonstrated by using an inductive coupling scheme based on a lumped-element microwave resonator and a mechanically compliant Josephson inductance32. By design, the linear inductance of the resonator was chosen much larger than the Josephson inductance, limiting the coupling strength in favor of tolerating large photon numbers. Complementary, it was shown that a distributed resonator with an embedded Josephson inductance allows to design arbitrarily large nonlinearities and can be used to realize two-level systems33.
Here, we present such an inductive coupling scheme based on a Josephson nonlinearity integrated into a coplanar waveguide resonator (CPW). For this device, we find a magnetic field tunable electromechanical vacuum coupling of up to 1.62 kHz. Moreover, we find a proportionality factor of 3.1 MHz T−1, between the coupling rate and the applied magnetic field, exceeding the one reported in ref. 32 by a factor of 120. In addition, the high coupling rate allows us to detect the mechanical motion with probe powers of 2.7 fW corresponding to an occupation of the microwave resonator with only a few photons. Hence, our device concept is naturally compatible with quantum microwave sources, which typically offer only a limited output power, and quantum-limited amplifiers with low saturation powers. These benefits make the device class ideally suited to act as a building block for the realization of inductively coupled devices integrated in more complex quantum circuits. Our results represent a significant step toward reaching the single-photon strong-coupling regime in electromechanics, allowing the investigation of quantum mechanical effects such as single-photon single-phonon blockade4,34, the creation of mechanical quantum states35, and the generation of non-classical light36.
Results and discussion
Circuit concept and fabrication
The nano-electromechanical device discussed here is based on a λ/4 superconducting CPW resonator which is shunted to ground at one of its ends via a direct-current superconducting quantum interference device (dc-SQUID) (cf. Fig. 1). As the SQUID acts as a flux-dependent inductance, the resonance frequency of the microwave circuit becomes flux sensitive. In addition, the SQUID loop is partly suspended and contains two nanomechanical string oscillators. Any displacement x of the strings translates into a change of the magnetic flux Φ threading the SQUID loop and, in turn, into the microwave resonance frequency ωc. The mechanically induced frequency shift can be described by the electromechanical interaction Hamiltonian \({\hat{H}}_{{\rm{int}}}=\hslash {g}_{0}{\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\hat{a}({\hat{b}}^{\dagger }+\hat{b})\), where \(\hat{a}\) (\(\hat{b}\)) are the ladder operators of the microwave resonator (mechanical oscillator). The electromechanical coupling constant18,19,21,37
scales with the length l of the string, the zero-point displacement \({x}_{{\rm{zpm}}}=\sqrt{\hslash /2{m}_{{\rm{eff}}}{\Omega }_{{\rm{m}}}}\), and the mode-shape γ of the mechanical resonator. Note, that g0 is tunable as the applied magnetic field Bext and the flux to resonance frequency transfer function ∂ωc/∂Φ, which we call in the following flux responsivity, can be controlled in situ.
We fabricate the electromechanical system as an all-aluminum superconducting circuit using electron beam lithography, double-layer shadow evaporation, and reactive ion etching (cf. Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 3 for details). The SQUID contains two freely suspended mechanical string oscillators as well as the two Josephson junctions. Each string has a length l = 20 μm, a width w = 200 nm, and a thickness t = 110 nm, corresponding to an effective mass of meff = 0.6 pg (all parameters of the device are summarized in Table 1). During the device fabrication, we anneal the entire chip at 350 ∘C resulting in tensile stressed aluminum strings with mechanical resonance frequencies Ωm ≃ 6.3 MHz at millikelvin temperatures. Thus, we obtain a zero-point fluctuation of xzpm = 47 fm. The microwave resonator is coupled capacitively at one of its ends to a microwave CPW feed-line, enabling the microwave spectroscopy of the device. The other end, is shunted to ground via the SQUID. In this way, we obtain a flux-tunable resonator with large flux responsivity ∂ωc/∂Φ, which is essential for the realization of a large electromechanical coupling strength.
Microwave resonator characterization
We start the characterization of the microwave circuit by performing microwave transmission measurements as shown in Fig. 2 (see Supplementary Note 1 B for details). Figure 2a shows the data as a function of the applied flux Φ, where the resonator appears as an absorption signature in dark blue. Figure 2b, c shows transmission data for two selected flux bias. For a quantitative analysis of the evolution of the microwave resonance frequency ωc, we locate the transmission minimum for each flux bias and plot ωc as well as ∂ωc/∂Φ versus the applied flux in Fig. 2d, e. We find that ∂ωc/∂Φ reaches values of up to 10 GHz/Φ0, underlining the performance of this coupling scheme. In addition, the ωc(Φ) dependence allows us to extract the single-junction critical current of the SQUID, Ic = 0.44 μA, and the minimum Josephson inductance, LJ = 0.36 nH, at ∂ωc/∂Φ = 0 (see Supplementary Note 2). Recording transmission data for selected flux bias points with higher frequency resolution (as shown in Fig. 2b, c) allows to determine the external coupling rate κext between the resonator and the feed-line as well as the internal loss rate κint of the microwave circuit. At ∂ωc/∂Φ = 0, we find a total linewidth of κ/2π = (κint + κext)/2π = 2.5 MHz. Figure 2f shows κext and κint as a function of the flux responsivity. While κext remains nearly constant, κint increases for large ∂ωc/∂Φ, which is attributed to the increased sensitivity of the circuit to flux noise. However, even at the bias point K, the device remains in the resolved sideband regime (Ωm > κ).
Quantification of the electromechanical readout performance
Next, we investigate the mechanical properties including the electromechanical coupling rate. For this experiment, we probe the microwave sideband fluctuations originating from the interaction of the incident probe tone with the mechanics. The probe tone is set to a blue sideband configuration (ωp = ωc + Ωm) to enable a sensitive detection of the scattered photons4. The resulting signal is down-converted with ωp. Figure 3a shows the voltage power spectral density SUU(Ω) detected using a spectrum analyzer (cf. Supplementary Note 1) for a temperature of 185 mK, when the microwave resonator is biased to working point K at ωc/2π = 6.887 GHz with Bext = −470 μT. We find a mechanical signature with a resonance frequency Ωm/2π = 6.34311 MHz and a full-width at half-maximum linewidth of Γm/2π = 33.6 Hz. In addition, we modulate the frequency of the incident microwave probe tone resulting in a calibration peak visible in panel a at ~−2 kHz. Similar to refs. 12,38, the comparison of the calibration tone amplitude \({S}_{{\rm{UU}}}({\Omega }_{{\rm{mod}}})\) with the mechanical response SUU(Ωm)Γm/2 allows us to quantify the electromechanical coupling rate g0. Due to the specific detection scheme used for this experiment, we need to account for an additional factor \({\mathcal{Y}}\), which relates the transfer function of the mechanical motion to the transmission function of the calibration tone (refer to Supplementary Note 4 for details). From this data, we obtain g0/2π = (1.62 ± 0.12) kHz. This value exceeds the highest coupling rate of 280 Hz17 achieved for capacitive coupling by a factor of 5.8 and corresponds to a single-photon cooperativity C0 of about 0.1. This large coupling strength allows us to use ultra-low probe powers for the detection of the mechanical sidebands. In fact, we use a probe power corresponding to an average photon number of \({\bar{n}}_{{\rm{r}}}=1.6\) in the microwave resonator for the spectrum shown in Fig. 3a. At this power level, we suppress back-action induced heating of the mechanical mode. In particular, for the parameters used in our experiment, we estimate an electromechanically induced damping rate of ∣Γem = −2.6 Hz∣ ≪ Γm, resulting in an increase in the thermal phonon occupation by 4%4, as we probe with a cooperativity of C ≃ C0 ≃ 0.1. This contribution is already accounted for in the stated value of g0 (for details see Supplementary Note 5). The background of SUU(Ω) shows the experimental imprecision noise \({S}_{{\rm{UU}}}^{{\rm{imp}}}\) of the experiment, which is presently limited by the performance of the cryogenic microwave amplifier used as the first amplification stage.
Our calibration technique allows us to express SUU(Ω) as the mechanical displacement spectrum Sxx(Ω) (see Supplementary Note 4). Figure 3b displays these spectra for various temperatures. We observe the expected increase in the phonon number with temperature in the form of an enlarged peak area. This manifests itself as an enhancement of the linewidth Γm with temperature (cf. Supplementary Information, Fig. S10a). This behavior has been observed for aluminum nano-strings and is attributed to the reduced dimensionality (1D) of the phonon mode39. In addition, we find a non-monotonic dependence of the imprecision noise floor on the environmental temperature. This behavior correlates with the temperature-dependent quality factor of the microwave resonator, which decreases above 185 mK. We speculate that this observation is connected to its population with thermal microwave photons, the presence of quasiparticles, and the motion of flux vortices (for details see Supplementary Note 4B).
The detected displacement power spectral density Sxx directly relates to the force sensitivity \({S}_{{\rm{FF}}}^{\det }\) via \({S}_{{\rm{FF}}}^{\det }=2{S}_{{\rm{xx}}}(\Omega )/| \chi {| }^{2}\)40 with the mechanical susceptibility \(\chi ={[{m}_{{\rm{eff}}}({\Omega }^{2}-{\Omega }_{{\rm{m}}}^{2}-i{\Gamma }_{{\rm{m}}}\Omega )]}^{-1}\) (cf. Supplementary Note 6). For T = 126 mK, we find an on-resonance force sensitivity of \({({S}_{{\rm{FF}}}^{\det })}^{1/2}=\,\text{0.70}\) aN Hz−1/2 (0.98 aN Hz−1/2) for a probe tone power of 5.3 fW (2.7 fW) corresponding to \({\bar{n}}_{{\rm{r}}}=1.7\) (0.86) photons. Here, the large electromechanical coupling rate (cf. Fig. 3c) allows to operate the device at much lower power compared to capacitive electromechanical devices having demonstrated 0.54 aN Hz−1/2 at probe powers of 1 pW40.
Tuning of the vacuum coupling strength
Next, we investigate the scaling of the electromechanical coupling strength with the applied magnetic field Bext and the flux responsivity ∂ωc/∂Φ, cf. Eq. (1). To this end, we excite the mechanical motion using an oscillatory mechanical force provided by piezo actuators resulting in a controlled oscillating displacement of the nano-strings. Under these conditions, the displacement amplitude is much larger compared to the thermal noise-driven measurements and hence much easier to detect (details are found in Supplementary Note 7). Figure 4a shows the measured resonance frequency shift of the microwave resonator δωc for various flux responsivities using a coherent excitation force at an approximately constant magnetic field of Bext ≈ −440 μT. As the frequency shift δωc is proportional to the product (∂ωc/∂Φ)δΦ, we observe a large δωc for large flux responsivity ∂ωc/∂Φ. Figure 4b summarizes the coupling rates derived from the peak amplitudes presented in Fig. 4a (dark green triangles) as well as the results of further experiments with a lower piezo actuator drive power (light green triangles) and links them to displacement noise measurements of g0 (red cross). The data corroborate the predicted linear scaling of the electromechanical coupling with the flux responsivity of up to 10 GHz/Φ0.
In a similar fashion, we measure the electromechanical response as a function of the applied magnetic field for a fixed flux responsivity of ∂(ωc/2π)/∂Φ = 6.6 GHz/Φ0 (bias point K) and present the data in Fig. 4c. Again, we link these data points to the thermal displacement measurements (red circles) and corroborate the linear scaling with Bext.
From Fig. 4c, we extract a scaling factor of (3.13 ± 0.20) MHz T−1 for the electromechanical coupling with respect to the applied magnetic field Bext. This value exceeds those of previous reports by two orders of magnitude32 and represents an important figure of merit as it allows one to estimate g0 at the given physical parameters of the device. For example, for the 70 nm thin aluminum film, we expect an in-plane critical field of 130 mT41 which extrapolates to g0/2π = 410 kHz. This coupling rate does not yet satisfy the single-photon strong coupling condition. However, improved microwave decoherence rates of up to 400 kHz as reported for superconducting quantum circuits42 in combination with an optimized critical current Ic of the SQUID will allow to reach the strong-coupling regime (see Supplementary Note 9). Nevertheless, ground-state cooling for \({\bar{n}}_{{\rm{r}}}=1\) is expected to be within reach for this device using moderate fields of Bext = 20 mT applied in parallel to the superconducting layer. Overall, we find an improvement of the vacuum coupling strength by a factor of 7 in comparison to previous inductive coupling schemes32.
Finally, Eq. (1) includes a mode-shape factor γ. With our experimental parameters outlined so far, we find γ = 0.99, which is in good agreement with previous findings16,32.
Besides electromechanically induced transparency (EMIT), which can be used to measure g0 given quantitative knowledge of the photon number12,32,43,44,45, one can utilize the signature of a modification of the microwave resonator absorption lineshape, using the strong binding condition δωc > Ωm46 to confirm g0. Given our parameters (see Table 1), we use the second strategy. Here, a large amplitude coherent oscillation of the displacement is excited by a coherent mechanical drive causing the characteristic pattern of the microwave resonator absorption lineshape. When combined with the nonlinear response of the string-oscillator, we can quantify the displacement and hence g0. Corresponding data (shown in Supplementary Information, Fig. S12) corroborates the coupling strengths determined via thermal displacement noise (data analysis is presented in Supplementary Note 8).
Conclusions
In summary, we present a device implementing an inductive electromechanical coupling scheme based on a superconducting coplanar waveguide resonator and a dc-SQUID operating in the resolved sideband regime. We demonstrate an electromechanical coupling rate of 1.62 kHz, exceeding values of capacitive coupling schemes by almost an order of magnitude. This high coupling rate enables an ultra-high force sensitivity of 0.70 aN Hz−1/2 at an ultra-low microwave readout power of 5.4 fW, making this device a very promising low-power force sensor. In addition, the maximum electromechanical coupling of 1.62 kHz in combination with the investigated tuning of the electromechanical coupling indicates that this coupling strategy has the potential to reach the single-photon strong-coupling regime of electromechanics. Moreover, the tunability of the coupling provides the access to new features of electromechanical systems such as state amplification and readout techniques using the resonator as a parametric amplifier.
During the review process, we became aware of similar works by refs. 47,48.
Methods
Calibration of the electromechanical coupling via thermal motion
For the determination of the electromechanical coupling constant, we use a scheme similar to the calibration tone technique discussed by Gorodetsky et al. in ref. 38. In particular, we use the microwave detection scheme where the frequency modulates the microwave source to generate the calibration tone. We down-convert the signal coming from the dilution fridge with an unmodulated local oscillator and perform a spectrum analysis of the down-converted signal. This results in the spectra shown in Fig. 3a. Via this scheme, the vacuum coupling strength is determined by
This is derived in full detail in Supplementary Note 4
Determination of the resonator transfer function
For a quantitative analysis of Eq. (2), we need to obtain information about the transfer functions \({\mathcal{Y}}\) involved as well. For our case, we find the transfer function depending in general on the microwave resonator characteristics and the employed probe tone configuration
as we derive in more detail in Supplementary Note 4A.
Scaling of the electromechanical coupling
Due to the nature of the inductive coupling, the electromechanical coupling rate is flux tunable (see Eq. (1)). Thus, we expect a linear scaling of the electromechanical coupling rate with ∂ωc/∂Φ and Bext. As discussed in the main text, one option to explore the scaling of g0 are thermal displacement noise experiments. Alternatively, and more time efficiently, one can measure the frequency shift of the microwave resonator for a fixed mechanical excitation amplitude. In this experiment, the signal amplitudes are significantly larger resulting in a faster data acquisition. In detail, we use a piezo actuator mounted on the outside of the sample enclosure to excite the nanostring. The piezo actuator is addressed using a fixed excitation voltage. As the displacement strength is independent of ∂ωc/∂Φ and Bext, the piezo actuator induces a displacement of constant amplitude. Thus, the recorded frequency shift δωc is determined only by the coupling strength, without the need for a calibration of the piezo susceptibility. If a quantification of the vacuum coupling strength is desired, the extracted frequency shift has to be calibrated independently. For that purpose, we use the spectroscopy of the nanostring’s thermal motion.
Data availability
Experimental data are available upon reasonable request at the corresponding author.
References
Leggett, A. J. Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 14, 415 (2002).
Poot, M. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Mechanical systems in the quantum regime. Phys. Rep. 511, 273 (2012).
Ockeloen-Korppi, C. F. et al. Noiseless quantum measurement and squeezing of microwave fields utilizing mechanical vibrations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 103601 (2017).
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
Abbott, B. P. et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
Moser, J. et al. Ultrasensitive force detection with a nanotube mechanical resonator. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 493 (2013).
Wollman, E. E. et al. Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator. Science 349, 952 (2015).
Lei, C. U. et al. Quantum nondemolition measurement of a quantum squeezed state beyond the 3 db limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 100801 (2016).
Aspelmeyer, M., Meystre, P. & Schwab, K. Quantum optomechanics. Phys. Today 65, 29 (2012).
Regal, C. A., Teufel, J. D. & Lehnert, K. W. Measuring nanomechanical motion with a microwave cavity interferometer. Nat. Phys. 4, 555 (2008).
Teufel, J. D. et al. Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state. Nature 475, 359 (2011).
Zhou, X. et al. Slowing, advancing and switching of microwave signals using circuit nanoelectromechanics. Nat. Phys. 9, 179 (2013).
Weber, P., Güttinger, J., Tsioutsios, I., Chang, D. E. & Bachtold, A. Coupling graphene mechanical resonators to superconducting microwave cavities. Nano Lett. 14, 2854 (2014).
Singh, V. et al. Optomechanical coupling between a multilayer graphene mechanical resonator and a superconducting microwave cavity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 820 (2014).
Pirkkalainen, J.-M. et al. Cavity optomechanics mediated by a quantum two-level system. Nat. Commun. 6, 6981 (2015).
Etaki, S. et al. Motion detection of a micromechanical resonator embedded in a d.c. SQUID. Nat. Phys. 4, 785 (2008).
Reed, A. P. et al. Faithful conversion of propagating quantum information to mechanical motion. Nat. Phys. 13, 1163 (2017).
Blencowe, M. P. & Buks, E. Quantum analysis of a linear dc SQUID mechanical displacement detector. Phys. Rev. B 76, 014511 (2007).
Nation, P., Blencowe, M. & Buks, E. Quantum analysis of a nonlinear microwave cavity-embedded dc SQUID displacement detector. Phys. Rev. B 78, 104516 (2008).
Nation, P. D., Suh, J. & Blencowe, M. P. Ultrastrong optomechanics incorporating the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 93, 022510 (2016).
Shevchuk, O., Steele, G. A. & Blanter, Y. M. Strong and tunable couplings in flux-mediated optomechanics. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014508 (2017).
Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162 (2004).
Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
Pirkkalainen, J.-M. et al. Hybrid circuit cavity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical resonator. Nature 494, 211 (2013).
Viennot, J. J., Ma, X. & Lehnert, K. W. Phonon-number-sensitive electromechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 183601 (2018).
Sletten, L. R., Moores, B. A., Viennot, J. J. & Lehnert, K. W. Resolving phonon Fock states in a multimode cavity with a double-slit qubit. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021056 (2019).
Moores, B. A., Sletten, L. R., Viennot, J. J. & Lehnert, K. W. Cavity quantum acoustic device in the multimode strong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 227701 (2018).
Khosla, K. E., Vanner, M. R., Ares, N. & Laird, E. A. Displacemon electromechanics: how to detect quantum interference in a nanomechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021052 (2018).
Abdi, M., Pernpeintner, M., Gross, R., Huebl, H. & Hartmann, M. J. Quantum state engineering with circuit electromechanical three-body interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173602 (2015).
Kounalakis, M., Blanter, Y. M. & Steele, G. A. Synthesizing multi-phonon quantum superposition states using flux-mediated three-body interactions with superconducting qubits. NPJ Quant. Inf. 5, 100 (2019).
Wang, Y.-D., Chesi, S. & Clerk, A. A. Bipartite and tripartite output entanglement in three-mode optomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. A 91, 013807 (2015).
Rodrigues, I. C., Bothner, D. & Steele, G. A. Coupling microwave photons to a mechanical resonator using quantum interference. Nat. Commun. 10, 5359 (2019).
Bourassa, J., Beaudoin, F., Gambetta, J. M. & Blais, A. Josephson-junction-embedded transmission-line resonators: from Kerr medium to in-line transmon. Phys. Rev. A 86, 013814 (2012).
Nunnenkamp, A., Borkje, K. & Girvin, S. Single-photon optomechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 063602 (2011).
Lü, X.-Y. et al. Squeezed optomechanics with phase-matched amplification and dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093602 (2015).
Qian, J., Clerk, A., Hammerer, K. & Marquardt, F. Quantum signatures of the optomechanical instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 253601 (2012).
Buks, E., Zaitsev, S., Segev, E., Abdo, B. & Blencowe, M. Displacement detection with a vibrating rf superconducting interference device: beating the standard linear limit. Phys. Rev. E 76, 026217 (2007).
Gorodetsky, M. L., Schliesser, A., Anetsberger, G., Deleglise, S. & Kippenberg, T. J. Determination of the vacuum optomechanical coupling rate using frequency noise calibration. Opt. Express 18, 23236 (2010).
Hoehne, F. et al. Damping in high-frequency metallic nanomechanical resonators. Phys. Rev. B 81, 231 (2010).
Teufel, J. D., Donner, T., Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Harlow, J. W. & Lehnert, K. W. Nanomechanical motion measured with an imprecision below that at the standard quantum limit. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 820 (2009).
Meservey, R. & Tedrow, P. M. Properties of very thin aluminum films. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 51 (1971).
Schneider, A. et al. Transmon qubit in a magnetic field: evolution of coherence and transition frequency. Phys. Rev. Res 1, 023003 (2019).
Weis, S. et al. Optomechanical induced transparency. Science 330, 1520 (2010).
Hocke, F. et al. Electromechanically induced absorption in a circuit nano-electromechanical system. New J. Phys. 14, 123037 (2012).
Yuan, M., Singh, V., Blanter, Y. M. & Steele, G. A. Large cooperativity and microkelvin cooling with a three-dimensional optomechanical cavity. Nat. Commun. 6, 8491 (2015).
Schliesser, A., Rivière, R., Anetsberger, G., Arcizet, O. & Kippenberg, T. J. Resolved-sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator. Nat. Phys. 4, 415 (2008).
Zoepfl, D., Juan, M. L., Schneider, C. M. F. & Kirchmair, G. Single-photon cooling in microwave magnetomechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 023601 (2020).
Bera, T., Majunder, S., Kumar, S. & Singh, V. Large flux-mediated coupling in hybrid electromechanical system with a transmon qubit. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.05700.pdf (2020).
Sulkko, J. et al. Strong gate coupling of high-Q nanomechanical resonators. Nano Lett. 10, 4884 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This project is funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 736943 and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy - EXC-2111 - 390814868. We gratefully acknowledge valuable scientific discussions with M. Aspelmeyer, K. Fedorov, M. Juan, G. Kirchmair, T. Poeschl, D. Schwienbacher, C. Utschick, S. Weichselbaumer, and D. Zoepfl.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.A. and P.S. designed and fabricated the sample. P.S. performed the experiments. H.H. and P.S. build the measurement setup. S.P., P.S., and H.H. performed theoretical modeling and analysis of the data. H.H., P.S., and R.G. wrote the paper. H.H. and R.G. conceived the experiment. F.D. and A.M. supported the SQUID fabrication. H.H., R.G., F.D., and A.M. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, P., T. Amawi, M., Pogorzalek, S. et al. Sideband-resolved resonator electromechanics based on a nonlinear Josephson inductance probed on the single-photon level. Commun Phys 3, 233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00501-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00501-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Nano-assembled open quantum dot nanotube devices
Communications Materials (2024)
-
Mechanical frequency control in inductively coupled electromechanical systems
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Four-wave-cooling to the single phonon level in Kerr optomechanics
Communications Physics (2022)
-
Large flux-mediated coupling in hybrid electromechanical system with a transmon qubit
Communications Physics (2021)