Abstract
Among all types of cancer, breast cancer is the most aggressive, as it is responsible for most of the cancer related death of women. Though several medical therapies are available, the scenario of curing such disease is not favorable. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find alternatives to deal with it. The knowledge of ethnopharmacy might give some better solution to mitigate such deadly diseases. Here, we are using the rhizome of Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Black turmeric), as well as gold nanoparticles (GNPs) synthesized with it to check their specific cytotoxic potentiality against breast cancer cell lines. In our study, ethanolic extract was used to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of the rhizome. GNPs were synthesized by using the same extract and characterized by UV–Vis spectroscopy (UV–Vis), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA). The TEM, XRD, FTIR and TGA results revealed the successful synthesis and capping of GNPs. The UV–Vis Spectrum showed a sharp and narrow absorption peak at 550 nm and HRTEM confirmed both the stability and successful synthesis of the nanoparticles. The MTT assay of the crude extract revealed strong cytotoxicity against breast cancer cell lines viz. MCF-7 (ER+) and MDA MB-231 (Triple Negative Breast Cancer, TNBC) by showing IC50 values as 15.70 ± 0.029 and 21.57 ± 0.031 μg/mL respectively. For extract mediated GNPs, the IC50 values were found to be 6.44 ± 0.045 and 5.87 ± 0.031μg/mL respectively in both breast cancer cell lines. As the IC50 value for GNPs was found to be much lower than that of crude extract, it indicates a higher efficiency of the GNP. However, both the rhizome extract and its mediated GNPs showed more toxicity towards MDA MB-231 (TNBC) cell lines. It was also observed that the GNPs showed more toxicity towards TNBC cell lines compared to the rhizome extract. No toxicity was found in case of other cell lines such as L 929 and HeLa for both crude extract as well as for GNPs. These observations suggests that both the crude rhizome extract and its derived GNPs exhibit selective cytotoxic potential against breast cancer cell lines, which might be exploited for target specific treatment. Moreover, with an understanding of the mechanism behind the GNPs therapeutic efficiency, it can be developed as a personalized therapy to treat such type of cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Black turmeric) is a perennial herb and is endemic to North East and central India1. It is widely cultivated in South East Asian countries and the rhizome of this plant is extensively used in folk medicine in this region2,3. The rhizome of black turmeric contain sar-turmerone,(Z)-ocimene,camphor,1, 8-cineole, borneol, elemene, bornyl acetate, curcuzederonear-curcumene,and curcumin as the mainelements4,5. It is used for curing myriad of ailments including cancer, haemorrhoids, epilepsy, leprosy, impotency, gonorrhoea and asthma etc. It is also used as central nervous system (CNS) depressant, locomotor depressant and smooth muscle relaxant6,7,8,9. Curcuminoid and curcuzederone, which are the major component of the rhizome of this species, are used particularly in breast cancer treatment10,11,12,13. The in-vivo antitumor activity of ethanolic extract of Curcuma caesia rhizome and cucurzederone (one of its compound) has already been reported against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma and triple negative breast cancer14,15,16. Though this plant has enough potentiality in pharmaceutical and therapeutic value this plant is now categorised as critically endangered species due to over exploitation17.Therefore, this plant is quite important from the conservation and medicinal point of view. Again, exploration of its potentiality towards cytotoxic in breast cancer might help in developing new horizon in treatment of such aggressive disease.
In recent years, nanotechnology has gained attention in various fields including textiles, electronics, energy, defence, catalysis, agriculture, food, water treatment and medicine18. Now, the use of nanomaterials in healthcare is considered as one of the most promising approach. As the nanoparticles are biocompatible, highly bioavailable and more precise, it has been drawing huge attention in the field of biomedical sciences specifically in bioimaging, drug delivery and cancer therapy18,19. Moreover, functionalization of such particles promote the interactions with different biomolecules thereby enhances its efficacy and reactivity20,21,22. Among different techniques of synthesis, green method has gained a wider acceptance as it is cost-effective, eco-friendly, stable and easy to store23. However, apart from its ample advantages, due to its smaller size and high surface-volume ratio, it exhibits high toxic effects to human health and to the environment24. As the adsorption of biomolecules and ions is determined by the surface area of the particles, it elicits the cell responses and thereby induces toxicity8. Furthermore, the shapes and structures also contribute to nanotoxicity. Certain nanopartilces, such ceramic particles used in drug delivery, have been reported to induce oxidative stress in liver, lungs, brain and heart as well as carcinogenic activities25. It also affects the environment due to rapid release of nanoparticles to it. Yet, the toxicity mechanism and the assessment of such particle are still not clear26.
Nanomaterial like the gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have drawn more interest due to its unique properties such as high optoelectrical as well as surface plasmon scattering properties, flexibility in tuning sizes, ease of modification. The unique physico-chemical properties of GNPs make them a potential agent in drug delivery system, cell imaging as well as in curing cancer27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) properties of GNPs make them an attractive contender in radiation therapy for cancer35,36. Although it is an attractive candidate to resolve different therapeutic issues, it has been reported that such particles have certain potential impact on environment and heath37,38. Its size and shape as well as its surface coating play a crucial role in determining toxicity39. Additionally, its small size and high surface area-volume ratio helps it to cross any physical barrier of the body system and thereby interact with different organs such as spleen, liver, brain40,41. In this context, an elevated level of accumulation and oxidative damages has already been reported in liver, spleen and other organs. Due to exposure during synthesis, applications and disposal it also accumulates in the environment and thus affects the whole food chain42. Generally, in therapeutic application, non-toxic, inert and easily dispersible GNPs are preferred43. Here, green chemistry method has been found to be advantageous over other available physical and chemical method of GNPs synthesis since it is eco-friendly and cost-effective44,45. Natural source, plant materials are preferentially used as reducing and capping agent in green synthesis of GNPs. Phytochemicals of plants such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tarpenoids and steroids are mainly responsible for the reduction of metal ion to its stable oxidative state46. The functional groups, basically carboxylic (–COOH), amide (–NH2C=O), hydroxyl (–OH) and carbonyl (C=O) etc. present in different phytochemicals have the ability to reduce and stabilize the ions through their hydrogen bonding, π–π bonding and electrostatic interactions capacity47.
The overall mechanism of synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plant extract mainly consists of four steps. In the first activation phase, ionization of the metal takes place in aqueous medium and these ions are trapped by the functional groups of the phytochemicals through electrostatic interactions between metal ions and the functional groups. In the next step, nucleation (metal nuclei) takes place through reduction of the metal ions attracted by the functional groups with the help of electron transfer. This second step is followed by the growth phase, where adjoining nanoparticles coalesce to form large sized particles through heterogenous nucleation process (Ostwald ripening process). In this step, the large sized nanoparticles also become thermodynamically stable. The last growth termination step involves capping of accumulate nanoparticles by the functional groups present in the phytochemiclas48,49,50. However, as different phytochemicals are involved to reduce mono or divalent metal ion into zero valent state (nano form), the particular mechanism of reduction is yet to be explained.
Plant derived GNPs have shown various functions in biomedical field such as antiviral, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities51. Recently, the plant mediated GNPs have brought different significant advancement in diagnosis and treatment of cancer52. Different plant species have been exploited to synthesize GNPs and to verify their biomedical applications. Curcumin encapsulated with GNPs as well as other polymeric nanoparticles have been reported to exhibit enhanced bioavailability53. However, the efficacy of the crude rhizome extract and its mediated synthesized GNPs of Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Black turmeric), which is endemic to North East India has been not studied so far. In our study, we investigated the specific in-vitro anticancer activity of ethanolic extract of its rhizome (EER) as well as EER mediated synthesized GNPs (synthesized at room temperature) on ER+ and TNBC cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA MB-231) as well as on different mammalian cell lines including HeLa and L929.
Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death in woman which accounts 22.9% of all cancer54,55. In developing country, the survival rate of the breast cancer patients is very poor. In India, one in 22 women has the possibility to be suffered from breast cancer during her lifetime56. The GNPs, synthesized using the rhizome extract of this plant might be a potential candidate in the treatment of breast cancer.
Results and discussion
Cytotoxic potential of EER
The anticancerous property of the EER was tested against four different cell lines including one normal cell line (L929) through tetrazolium assay (MTT). Different concentrations of the drugs ranging from 0.5 to 200 µg/mL were used for the test. The EER showed no cytotoxic effects for cell lines L929 and HeLa (Fig. 1). A high viability of the cells was observed for both these cell lines (93.83 ± 4.2% and 96.71 ± 3.9% respectively). IC50 values for both the cell lines were obtained as 91.27 ± 0.046 and 94.80 ± 0.038 μg/mL respectively (Table 1). But, interestingly, the MTT assay revealed strong cytotoxicity against the breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 (ER+) and MDA MB-231 (TNBC) respectively (Fig. 1). The IC50 values for both MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 were found as 15.70 ± 0.029 and 21.57 ± 0.031 μg/mL respectively (Table 1). In our investigation, the cell viability was observed to be decreased with the increase of concentrations of EER (Fig. 2). Similar result was observed for zerumbone, one of the major constituents of Curcuma caesia. The IC50 value for zerumbone in case of MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 was found as 13.0 ± 0.8, 25.2 ± 1.5 mM57. Significant antimigratory effect against MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 was also shown by the bark extract of Albizia lebbeck58. The ethanolic leaf extract of Annona muricata and Lantana camara showed similar result on MCF-7 as well as on MDA MB-231 respectively59,60. Extract of Sambucus ebulus showed a satisfactory antiproliferative effect against triple negative breast cancer61. IC50 value less than 30 µg/mL is considered as the highly cytotoxic according to the guidelines of National Cancer Institute (NCI)62,63. However, in our study, the EER showed more toxicity towards MDA-MB 231 (TNBC) cell lines (Figs. 1 and 2). This is might be due to the presence of functional groups of the rhizome which are more specific in action towards the TNBC cell lines. Thus, the present study indicates the potential breast cancer specificity of EER. Strong cytotoxicity of EER of this plant against triple negative breast cancer (MDA MB-231) was in accordance with the findings of earlier reports12,64. The understanding of the exact mechanism behind the specificity of the rhizome extract towards TBNC toxicity might help in formulating traditional medicine in near future.
Synthesis of GNPs
The EER mediated synthesized GNPs were characterized by UV–vis spectroscopy, Transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and Thermo gravimetric analysis.
UV–VIS absorbance spectroscopy
The synthesis of GNPs was ensured from the colour change of the reaction mixture from yellow to ruby red colour. Synthesis of GNPs was confirmed with a UV–vis spectrophotometer. A distinct surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band with sharp and narrow peak was observed centred at around 550 nm (Supplementary Information, S1). Optimum condition for synthesis of GNPs were observed as 1.2% (v/v) EER, 1.5 h reaction time and 0.875 mM gold solution as shown in the Supplementary Information, S1.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
TEM analysis of the optimized reaction mixture revealed that nanoparticles were of spherical and hexagonal in shape (Fig. 3). The ultra high-resolution TEM (UHRTEM) image and selected area electron diffraction (SAED)pattern showed clear lattice fringes and bright rings corresponding to (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0) and (3 1 1) respectively which confirmed the crystal nature of GNPs (Figs. 4, 5). The size of the particles varied from10 to 26 nm (Fig. 3). The average particle size was found to be 18 ± 2.095 nm.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
XRD pattern of synthesized GNPs showed four prominent Bragg reflections at the intensities of (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0) and (3 1 1) which were indexed on the basis of fcc structure of gold crystal planes (Fig. 5).
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
The FTIR spectrum of EER revealed characteristic IR bands for C=O stretching vibration for ester group (1049.3 cm−1,1095.6 cm−1), for C–H stretching for alkanes (2981.0 cm−1), hydrogen bonded O–H stretch for phenols/alcohols (3479.6 cm−1) functional groups. Band at 1714.7 cm−1 indicates the vibration of carbonyl group (Curve 1, Fig. 6A). All these bands were likely originated from different phytochemicals present in the EER. Appearance of IR band at 1049, 1095and 2981.0 cm−1 unveiled the distinctive absorption of polysaccharides present in the endangered plant species. Polysaccharides are generally responsible for the enhancement of body immunity, antitumor activity and confronting damage due to radiation34. FTIR spectrum of lyophilized GNPs showed almost common IR bands to EER (Curve 2, Fig. 6A). Distinct IR bands corresponding to ester, alkanes, as well as carbonyl functional groups were found to be observed for GNPs. The FTIR analysis gives the strong evidence of capping behaviour of EER which makes GNPs highly stable.
Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis
The temperature of the TGA spectra ranged from 158 to 725 °C. TGA spectral analysis revealed substantial weight loss of GNPs which suggests the degradation of the bioactive molecules capped on GNPs due to high temperature (Fig. 6B).
Cytotoxicity of GNPs
MTT assay was performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the synthesized GNPs for the same four cancer cell lines using different concentrations (0.5 to 200 µg/mL). Similar result was found to be observed as that of EER. The MTT assay revealed strong cytotoxicity against both breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and MDA MB-231, but no toxic effect for L929 as well as HeLa (Fig. 7). Similar result was observed for iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by methanolic extract of Moringa oleifera. The spherical M. oleifera mediated iron oxide NPs showed potential antiproliferative and cytotoxic effect against MDA MB-23165. Similarly, aqueous leaf extracts of Cordia myxa L. and Ziphus spina-christi showed a significant anticancer activity against MCF-7 cell line66. Here, the IC50 value for both the breast cancer cell lines (6.44 ± 0.045 and 5.87 ± 0.031 μg/mL respectively) was much lower than as that found in case of EER, which indicates more efficacy of GNPs than EER. The overview of the IC50 value is presented in the Table 1. In this study, it was found that similar to EER, GNPs also showed stronger toxicity to MDA-MB 231 (TNBC) cell lines (Figs. 7 and 8). However, as that of EER, the cell viability decreased with the increase of concentrations of GNPs (Fig. 8). The cytotoxic efficiency of GNPs might be more due to their surface properties and small size. Due to the charge differences between cell membrane (negatively charged) and the GNPs (positively charged) it can interact with the cell membrane of the cancerous cells and interferes the cell permeability. Thereby, it enters into the mitochondria and damage the electron transport system. It also produces a high-level of ROS and ultimately through DNA damage and apoptosis, the cells death occurs (52). In our investigation, as GNPs showed more potential towards TNBC cell lines, with further exploration of its effectiveness, specificity and underlying molecular mechanism might help in development of personalised medicine for treatment of this deleterious disease.
Conclusion
In the present investigation, we aimed to demonstrate the selective cytotoxicity of Curcuma caesia rhizome extract and its mediated gold nanoparticles towards breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA MB-231), while assessing their general cytotoxic potential on other cancerous and non-cancerous cell lines (HeLa, L929). In our study, it was found that the extract and the synthesized GNPs showed no cytotoxic effect on both HeLa, L929 cell lines. The extract and the GNPs epitomized specific potentiality against breast cancer cell lines. However, compared to the extract, GNPs showed more cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 cell lines. Moreover, compared to MCF-7, both the extract and the GNPs were found to be more toxic for MDA-MB 231. In our study, it was also observed that the synthesized GNPs showed more potentiality towards MDA-MB 231 toxicity compared to the extract. Therefore, the synthesized GNPs might be used for target specific cancer treatment. Combination of traditional medicine with such nanomaterial might provide a better opportunity for development of new anti-breast cancer agents. Nevertheless, based on this preliminary data, further investigation is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism behind the breast cancer specificity (especially for TNBC) of the rhizome of this endangered species and GNPs synthesized by its extract.
Materials and methods
Materials
All chemicals required to carry out this experiment such as Ethanol, HAuCl4 aqueous solution, Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) [MTT], Dimethylsulphoxide were obtained from Sigma (Bangalore, India) and Merk (Mumbai, India) and were of analytical grade and of high purity (more than 99%). Cell lines used in this study were procured from National Centre for Cell Sciences (Pune, India). The rhizome of Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Black turmeric) was collected from R&D division, NEDFi, Khetri (Assam, India) following the guidelines of National Biodiversity Authority, India. The rhizome was collected during the month of April and was authenticated by Dr. Sauravjyoti Borah, Curator, Department of Botany, Gauhati University, Assam, India. The voucher specimen had been submitted to the herbarium of Department of Botany, Gauhati University and the Accession No. of the specimen is GUBH20605.
Methods
Preparation of ethanolic extract of rhizome (EER)
The collected rhizome of Curcuma caesia Roxb. was thoroughly washed with double distilled water for several times to remove dust and sliced into small pieces. The sliced pieces were shade dried in a dust free condition for about two months at room temperature. Dried pieces were grinded using a mixer grinder (Model: Bajaj GX 11, Mumbai, India) and strained 3–4 times to get fine powder. For preparation of extract, the fine powders were dissolved in ethanol in the ratio of 1:3(w/v) and incubated in a shaking incubator (100 rpm, 25 °C and 72 h.). The ethanolic extract of the rhizome (EER) was obtained by filtering the mixture. The filtered extract was dried by using rotary evaporator (Rotera Equitron, Make: MedicaInstrument Mfg. Co., Mumbai, India) and lyophilizer. The lyophilized powder was stored at 4°Cfor further study.
Cytotoxicity of EER
Sample preparation
Stock solution of EER was prepared by mixing 160 mg of lyophilized powder in 1 mL of DMSO (Dimethylsulphoxide).The stock solution was filter sterilized and different concentrations of the extract(ranging from 0.5 to 500 µg/mL) were prepared from it. These concentrations were used for cytotoxic analysis.
In case of GNPs, stock solution was prepared for cytotoxic study by mixing the lyophilized powder of GNPs with plain DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium). Different concentrations of GNPs were prepared from the filter sterilized stock solution using plain DMEM and used for toxicity study.
Cell culture
Different cell lines such as HeLa (human cervical cancer), L 929 (normal rat fibroblast), MCF-7 (human breast cancer) and MDA MB-231 (triple negative breast cancer) were maintained in complete DMEM containing 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 2 mM l-glutamine and 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; heat inactivated) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution (1000 U/mL penicillin G, 10 mg/mL streptomycin sulphate, 5 mg/mL gentamycin and 25 µg/mL amphotericin B) in 25 and 75 cm2 mammalian cell culture flasks. The cells were cultured by keeping the flasks in a CO2incubator (Heal Force, HF 160 W, Shanghai, China) at 37 °C, 90% relative humidity, 5% CO2 and 95% air. When the cells approached 70–80% confluency, they were sub-cultured (passaged) with trypsin–EDTA and fresh medium into 25cm2 culture flasks.
Cytotoxicity assay
For cytotoxic assay of the EER, HeLa, L 929, MCF-7 and MDA MB-231cells were seeded (100 µL each) in each well of four different 96-well flat bottom tissue culture plate (Cell Bind, Corning, Germany) and incubated in complete medium for 24 h in a CO2 incubator under conventional culture condition (37 °C, 5% CO2 and 90% relative humidity). After 24 h of incubation, the complete medium was replaced from each well with100 µl of plain medium (serum free) that contained varied concentration of EER (except the control) such that DMSO content in each well was 1%. This was done to minimize the cytotoxic effects of DMSO. In case of control, 100 µL of plain medium without drug was added. For each concentration, four replications were maintained in every case. The plates were then incubated for another 24 h. After 24 h, the plain medium from each and every well was removed and the cells were washed with PBS (Phosphate buffer solution). Following this, 100 µL of MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] prepared in plain medium(0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well and all the plates were incubated for 4 h. After incubation, the medium was removed without disturbing the formazan crystals (the living cells converted the soluble MTT salt into insoluble purple coloured formazan). After removal of the medium, 100 µL of DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance of formazan solution at 570 nm was determined by using a multiwell plate reader (Tecan microplate reader, model 680, California, USA). Cell viability was calculated by using the following formula.
where, Nt and Nc are the mean absorbance of treated and untreated cells respectively.
The IC50 (inhibition concentration) was determined from the graph of the number of viable cells against drug concentration.
Synthesis of GNPs
To synthesize GNPs, 0.8% (v/v) of EER was mixed with 0.875 mM HAuCl4 (chlorauric acid) aqueous solution. The whole mixture was allowed to run for constant magnetic stirring (C-MAG-HS7, IKA®) at room temperature (25 °C) and observed for any colour change. The concentration of EER was optimized by mixing varying concentration of EER (0.2 to 1.2%, v/v) with 0.875 mM HAuCl4 aqueous solution. The concentration of HAuCl4 was optimized by reacting varying concentration of HAuCl4 (0.250–1.125 mM) with 0.8% (v/v) of EER. Optimization of reaction time was done by stirring the reaction mixture of 0.8% (v/v) of EER and 0.875 mM HAuCl4aqueous solution for different time period (1–4 h.). The final reaction volume was made up to 2 mL with double distilled water in each case.
Characterization of GNPs
UV–VIS absorbance spectroscopy
The absorption spectra of the reaction mixture were scanned at the wavelength between 200 and 900 nm on a Tecan Infinite M200 UV–VIS spectrophotometer and thus synthesis of GNPs was confirmed.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
TEM analysis was carried out on a JEOL 2100 UHRTEM microscope. For TEM analysis, samples were prepared by drying a carbon coated copper grid on which the GNPs solution coated by putting two or three drops over it. Morphology, crystalline nature and size distribution of GNPs were analysed by TEM.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
Crystalline nature of the synthesized GNPs was confirmed from X-ray diffractograms (XRD). XRD was studied on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray powder diffractometer (Bruker AXS Inc.) operating at 45 kV and 45 mA with Cu source at 1.54 Å wavelength.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
Interactions of EER with GNPs were analysed in the range of 450–4000 cm−1 by using a FT-IR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu IR Affinity 1).
Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis
Capping behaviour of the phytochemicals present in EER with GNPs were studied using Thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) (Model: TGA-7, Perkin-Elmer).
Cytotoxicity of GNPs
Same procedure was followed for the cytotoxicity study of GNPs as that of EER. In this case also four different cell lines (HeLa, L 929, MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 respectively) were used. The drug used was different concentrations of GNPs.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this manuscript [and its supplementary information files].
References
Ravindran, P. N., Nirmal, B. K. & Sivaraman, K. Turmeric: The Genus Curcuma 11 (CRC Press, 2007).
Sasikumar, B. Genetic resources of Curcuma: Diversity, characterization and utilization. Plant Genet. Resour. 3(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1079/PGR200574 (2005).
Charles, S. V., Elias, U. M., Ramachandram, T. R. & Kamada, T. Secondary metabolites from rhizome of Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Zingiberaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 48, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BSE.2012.11.008 (2013).
Mahato, D. & Sharma, H. P. Kali Haldi, an ethnomedicinal plant of Jharkhand state: A review. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 17(2), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.133520 (2018).
Devi, H. P., Mazumder, P. B. & Devi, L. P. Antioxidant and antimutagenic activity of Curcuma caesia Roxb. rhizome extracts. Toxicol. Rep. 2, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.12.018 (2015).
Baghel, S. S., Baghel, R. S., Sharma, K. & Sikarwar, I. Pharmacological activities of Curcuma caesia. Int. J. Green Pharm. 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-8258.111590 (2013).
Karmakar, I., Dolai, N., Bala, A. & Haldar, P. K. Anxiolytic and CNS depressant activities of methanol extract of Curcuma caesia rhizome. Pharmacology 2, 738–747. https://doi.org/10.1300/J157v06n03_06 (2011).
Arulmozhi, D. K., Sridhar, N., Veeranjaneyulu, A. & Arora, S. K. Preliminary mechanistic studies on the smooth muscle relaxant effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Curcuma caesia. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 6, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/j157v06n03_06 (2006).
National Medicinal Plants Board. Agro-Techniques if Selected Medicinal Plants (The Energy and Resources Institute Press, 2008).
Chiu, T. L. & Su, C. C. Curcumin inhibits proliferation and migration by increasing the Bax to Bcl-2 ratio and decreasing NF-kappaBp65 expression in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 23, 469–475. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm_00000153 (2009).
Liu, Q., Loo, W. T., Sze, S. C. & Tong, Y. Curcumin inhibits cell proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and BT-483 breast cancer cells mediated by down-regulation of NFkappaB, cyclinD and MMP-1 transcription. Phytomedicine 16, 916–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2009.04.008 (2009).
Mohammad, A. A., Eltayeb, N. M., Khairuddean, M. & Salhimia, S. M. Bioactive chemical constituents from Curcuma caesia Roxb. rhizomes and inhibitory effect of curcuzederone on the migration of triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Nat. Res. Prod. 35(18), 3166–3170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1690489 (2019).
Liu, H. T. & Ho, Y. S. Anticancer effect of curcumin on breast cancer and stem cells. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 7(2), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.06.001 (2018).
Krmakar, L., Dolai, N., Suresh, K. R. B. & Halder, P. K. Antitumer activity and antioxidant property of Curcuma caesia against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma bearing mice. Pharma Biol. 51(6), 753–759. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.764538 (2013).
Kumar, S., Dubey, K. K., Tripathi, S., Fujii, M. & Misra, K. Design and synthesis of curcumin-bioconjugates to improve systemic delivery. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 44, 75–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/nass/44.1.75 (2000).
Hadem, K. L. H., Sharan, R. N. & Kma, L. Phytochemicals of Aristolochiatagala and Curcuma caesia exert anticancer effect by tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated decrease in nuclear factor kappa B binding activity. J Basic Clin. Pharm. 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.170585 (2015).
Prasad, R.; Patnaik, S. Conservation Assessment and Management Planning. Proceeding of the Conservation Assessment and Management Planning (CAMP) Workshop for Non timber forest products in Madhya Pradesh 1–99 (Indian Institute of Forest Management, 1998).
Salem, S. S. A mini review on green nanotechnology and its development in biological effects. Arch. Microbiol. 205, 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-023-03467-2 (2023).
Ventola, C. L. The nanomedicine revolution: Part 1: Emerging concepts. Pharm. Ther. 37(9), 512–525 (2012).
Afzal, O., Altamimi, A. S. A. & Nadeem, M. S. Nanoparticles in drug delivery: From history to therapeutic applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 12(24), 4494. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244494 (2022).
Vollath, D., Fischer, F. D. & Holec, D. Surface energy of nanoparticles: Influence of particle size and structure. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 9, 2265–2276. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.211 (2018).
Sharma, K. P. et al. Nanotechnology and its application: A review nanotechnology. In Cancer Management Precise Diagnostics Toward Personalized Health Care 1–33 (Elsevier, 2021).
Das, A. K. et al. Papaya latex mediated synthesis of prism shaped proteolytic gold nanozymes. Sci. Rep. 13, 5965. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32409-7 (2023).
Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E. & Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 113, 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7339 (2005).
Cui, D., Tian, F., Ozkan, C. S., Wang, M. & Gao, H. Effect of single wall carbon nanotubes on human HEK293 cells. Toxicol. Lett. 155, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.08.015 (2005).
Gupta, D., Yadav, P., Garg, D. & Gupta, T. K. Pathways of nanotoxicity: Modes of detection, impact, and challenges. Front. Mater. Sci. 15, 512–542 (2021).
Li, J. J., Hartono, D., Ong, C. N., Bay, B. H. & Yung, L. Y. Autophagy and oxidative stress associated with gold nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31(23), 5996–6003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.014 (2010).
Wei, P., Zhang, L., Lu, Y., Man, N. & Wen, L. C60(Nd) nanoparticles enhance chemotherapeutic susceptibility of cancer cells by modulation of autophagy. Nanotechnology 21(49), 495101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/49/495101 (2010).
Yamawaki, H. & Iwai, N. Cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerene in vascular endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290, 1495. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00481.2005 (2006).
Zhang, Q. et al. Autophagy-mediated chemosensitization in cancer cells by fullerene C60 nanocrystal. Autophagy 5(8), 1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.5.8.9842 (2009).
Seleverstov, O. et al. Quantum dots for human mesenchymal stem cells labelling. A size-dependent autophagy activation. Nano Lett. 6, 2826–2832. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0619711 (2006).
Stern, S. T. et al. McNeil induction of autophagy in porcine kidney cells by quantum dots: A common cellular response to nanomaterials?. Toxicol. Sci. 106(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn137 (2008).
Ankamwar, B. et al. Biocompatibility of Fe3O4 nanoparticles evaluated by in vitro cytotoxicity assays using normal, glia and breast cancer cells. Nanotechnology 21, 075102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/7/075102 (2010).
Hong, H. et al. Cancer-targeted optical imaging with fluorescent zinc oxide nanowires. Nano Lett. 11(9), 3744–3750. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201782m (2011).
Dreaden, E. C., Mackey, M. A., Huang, X., Kang, B. & El-Sayed, M. A. Beating cancer in multiple ways using nanogold. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3391–3404. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00180E (2011).
El-Sayed, M. A. Some interesting properties of metals confined in time and nanometer space of different shapes. AccChem Res. 34(4), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar960016n (2001).
Pan, Y. et al. Gold nanoparticles of diameter 1.4 Nm trigger necrosis by oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Small 5, 2067–2076. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200900466 (2009).
Chen, Y. S., Hung, Y. C., Liau, I. & Huang, G. S. Assessment of the in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 4, 858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9334-6 (2009).
Sani, A., Cao, C. & Cui, D. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): A review. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 26, 10991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100991 (2021).
Zhang, X. D. et al. In vivo renal clearance, biodistribution, toxicity of gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials 33, 4628–4638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.020 (2012).
Meng, J. et al. Using gold nanorods core/silver shell nanostructures as model material to probe biodistribution and toxic effects of silver nanoparticles in mice. Nanotoxicology. 8, 686–696. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.822593 (2014).
Chan, H. & Král, P. Nanoparticles self-assembly within lipid bilayers. ACS Omega 3, 10631–10637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b01445 (2018).
Joshi, P. et al. The anticancer activity of chloroquine-gold nanoparticles against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Colloids Surf. B 95, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.02.039 (2012).
Das, R. K., Sharma, P., Nahar, P. & Bora, U. Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Calotropisprocera latex. Mater. Lett. 65, 610–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.11.040 (2011).
Bar, H. et al. synthesis of silver nanoparticles using latex of Jatropha curcas. Colloids Surf. A 339, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.02.008 (2009).
Khan, F. et al. Green nanotechnology: Plant-mediated nanoparticle synthesis and application. Nanomaterials 12, 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12040673 (2022).
Swilam, N. & Khaled, A. N. Polyphenols profile of pomegranate leaves and their role in green synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 10, 14851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71847-5 (2020).
Glusker, J., Katz, A., Bock, C. & Rigaku, J. Metal ions in biological systems. Chem. Biol. 16(2), 8–16 (1999).
Si, S. & Mandal, T. K. Tryptophan-based peptides to synthesize gold and silver nanoparticles: A mechanistic and kinetic study. Chemistry 13(11), 3160–3168. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200601492 (2007).
Akinfenwa, A. O. & Hussein, A. A. Phyto-metallic nanoparticles: Biosynthesis, mechanism, therapeutics, and cytotoxicity. In Toxicity of Nanoparticles: Recent Advances and New Perspectives (IntechOpen, 2023).
Kavaz, D., Huzaifa, U. & Zimuto, T. Biosynthesis of Gold nanoparticles using Scytosiphon lomentaria (Brown algae) and Spyridia filamentosa (Red algae) from Kyrenia Region and evaluation of their antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem. 47(4), 367–382 (2019).
Bharadwaj, K. K. et al. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plant extracts as beneficial prospect for cancer theranostics. Molecules 26, 6389. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216389 (2021).
Rahimi, H. R., Nedaeinia, R., Shamloo, A. S., Nikdoust, S. & Oskuee, R. K. Novel delivery system for natural products: Nano-curcumin formulations. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 6(4), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.22038/AJP.2016.6187 (2016).
Lesner, S. & Cotran, R. Breast cancer. In Robbins Pathologic Basis of Diseases (eds Cotran, R. et al.) 1093–1120 (. Sounders, 1999).
World Cancer Report. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2008).
Ferlay, J. et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann. Oncol. 18(3), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdl498 (2007).
Abdelhamed, S. et al. Identification of plant extracts sensitizing breast cancer cells to TRAIL. Oncol. Rep 29(5), 1991–1998. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2293 (2013).
Umar, H. et al. Prediction of cell migration potential on human breast cancer cells treated with Albizia lebbeck ethanolic extract using extreme machine learning. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 22242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49363-z (2023).
Hadisaputri, Y. E. et al. Antiproliferation activity and apoptotic mechanism of soursop (Annona muricata L.) leaves extract and fractions on MCF7 breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer 16(13), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S317682 (2021).
Pal, A., Sanyal, S., Das, S. & Sengupta, T. K. Effect of Lantana camara ethanolic leaf extract on survival and migration of MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cell line. J. Herb. Med. 43, 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2023.100837 (2024).
Omrani, V. F. et al. Effects of sambucus ebulus extract on cell proliferation and viability of triple-negative breast cancer: An in vitro and in vivo study. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 22(7), 1386–1396. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520621666210412113944 (2022).
Suffness, M. & Pezzuto, J. M. Assays related to cancer drug discovery. In Assays for Bioactivity (Methods in Plant Biochemistry Vol. 6 (ed. Hostettmann, K.) 71–133 (Academic Press, 1990).
Abdel-Hameed, E. S., Salih, A., Bazaid, S. A. & El-Sayed, M. M. Phytochemical studies and evaluation of antioxidant, anticancer and antimicrobial properties of Conocarpus erectus L. growing in Taif. Saudi Arabia. Eur. J. Med. Plants 2, 93–112. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJMP/2012/1040 (2012).
Abdelhamed, S. et al. Identification of plant extracts sensitizing breast cancer cells to TRAIL. Oncol. Rep. 29(5), 2293. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2293 (2013).
Umar, H. & Aliyu, M. R. Moringa oleifera-mediated iron oxide nanoparticles, characterization and their anti-proliferative potential on MDA-MB 231 human breast cancer cells. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 36(6), 1875–1883 (2023).
Abed, S. A., Mohammed, M. A. & Khalaf, H. Y. Novel photothermal therapy using platinum nanoparticles in synergy with near-infrared radiation (NIR) against human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line. Results Chem. 4(1–2), 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100591 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We thank and acknowledge Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for providing funding support for this work. AKD would like to thank Biotech Hub, Centre for Environment, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati for providing necessary facilities for carrying out the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: Ajoy K Das, Utpal Bora. Performed the experiments: Ajoy K Das. Analyzed the data: Ajoy K Das, Maina Borah, Jon Jyoti Kalita and Utpal Bora. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Utpal Bora, Ajoy K Das, Maina Borah and Jon Jyoti Kalita.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Das, A.K., Borah, M., Kalita, J.J. et al. Cytotoxic potential of Curcuma caesia rhizome extract and derived gold nanoparticles in targeting breast cancer cell lines. Sci Rep 14, 17223 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66175-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66175-x
- Springer Nature Limited