Abstract
Hydrogen peroxide is considered deleterious molecule that cause cellular damage integrity and function. Its key redox signaling molecule in oxidative stress and exerts toxicity on a wide range of organisms. Thus, to understand whether oxidative stress alters visual development, zebrafish embryos were exposed to H2O2 at concentration of 0.02 to 62.5 mM for 7 days. Eye to body length ratio (EBR) and apoptosis in retina at 48 hpf, and optomotor response (OMR) at 7 dpf were all measured. To investigate whether hydrogen peroxide-induced effects were mediated by oxidative stress, embryos were co-incubated with the antioxidant, glutathione (GSH) at 50 μM. Results revealed that concentrations of H2O2 at or above 0.1 mM induced developmental toxicity, leading to increased mortality and hatching delay. Furthermore, exposure to 0.1 mM H2O2 decreased EBR at 48 hpf and impaired OMR visual behavior at 7 dpf. Additionally, exposure increased the area of apoptotic cells in the retina at 48 hpf. The addition of GSH reversed the effects of H2O2, suggesting the involvement of oxidative stress. H2O2 decreased the expression of eye development-related genes, pax6α and pax6β. The expression of apoptosis-related genes, tp53, casp3 and bax, significantly increased, while bcl2α expression decreased. Antioxidant-related genes sod1, cat and gpx1a showed decreased expression. Expression levels of estrogen receptors (ERs) (esr1, esr2α, and esr2β) and ovarian and brain aromatase genes (cyp19a1a and cyp19a1b, respectively) were also significantly reduced. Interestingly, co-incubation of GSH effectivity reversed the impact of H2O2 on most parameters. Overall, these results demonstrate that H2O2 induces adverse effects on visual development via oxidative stress, which leads to alter apoptosis, diminished antioxidant defenses and reduced estrogen production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
There is a growing recognition that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is also involved in genuine physiological processes1. This compound is notable as a highly stable and widespread reactive oxygen species (ROS) in aquatic ecosystems, arising not only as an unintentional toxic byproduct of metabolic processes within aquatic organisms but also from photochemical reactions occurring in natural water environments2,3. Additionally, atmospheric wet deposition has been identified as another significant source of H2O2 in aquatic ecosystems4,5. Aquatic environments may directly accumulate H2O2 due to anthropogenic activities like aquaculture, soil remediation, and wastewater treatment6,7. The concentration of H2O2 in natural water ranges widely, from 0.004 to 199 μM. These diverse concentrations have been extensively documented across various aquatic environments such as rivers (0.09–3.2 μM)8, lakes (0.00–5.31 μM)9, estuaries (0.01–0.35 μM)10, open oceans (0.06–0.45 μM)11, and rain (0–199 μM)12. High concentrations of H2O2 in aquatic environments can have detrimental effects on aquatic organisms, leading to abnormal physiological responses, altered behaviors, and compromised immune systems in species such as rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)13, sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)14, sea bream (Sparus aurata)15. This highlights the critical need for further research and monitoring to understand and mitigate the potential negative effects of H2O2 levels on aquatic ecosystem.
H2O2 acting as a cell damaging agent that is produced during normal cellular metabolism, particularly during processes such as oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria of aerobic organisms16. This includes a wide range of organisms, from microbes to plants and animals, all of which are capable of generating H2O2 as part of their regular cellular functions17. However, the excessive production of oxygen metabolites, including H2O2, results in oxidative stress and diseases18. Interestingly, recent research has unveiled a new perspective on H2O2. Despite its reputation as a harmful oxidant, H2O2 has been found to serve as a crucial signaling molecule with beneficial effects in specific cellular contexts16. Oxidative stress arises when oxidizing agents, free radicals, and reactive oxygen species surpass cellular antioxidant capacity19. ROS, byproducts of oxygen metabolism, play essential roles in physiological functions, including cell signaling. However, environmental stressors (such as UV radiation, ionising radiations, pollutants, and heavy metals) and xenobiotics (such as anticancer medications) significantly elevate ROS production, causing imbalance and cellular damage, also called oxidative stress20. Elevated ROS production induces adverse effects on crucial cellular structures, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids21. Evidence suggests oxidative stress's involvement in various diseases, including cancer, diabetes, metabolic disorders, atherosclerosis, endocrine dysfunction, infertility, neurological, and cardiovascular diseases22,23,24.
Increased ROS levels, coupled with normal antioxidant levels, induce oxidative stress in the brain, triggering apoptosis, cellular damage, and cell death. Elevated cell death often correlates with severe developmental abnormalities. Apoptosis, a common type of programmed cell death25, involves two main pathways in mammals and zebrafish: the intrinsic (also known as the mitochondrial pathway) and the cell-extrinsic pathway (death receptor pathway)26. The intrinsic pathway responds to various cellular stresses, including oxidative stress, and is regulated by pro-apoptotic genes like tp5327 and bax28, along with the suppression of anti-apoptotic members of the bcl-2 gene family. It can be activated by numerous triggers including growth factor withdrawal and cellular damage29. Conversely, the extrinsic pathway begins with death receptor binding on the cell surface, initiating apoptosis through a death-inducing signalling complex. Both pathways ultimately converge on a shared group of effector caspases, such as caspase-3, which execute programmed cell death30.
Antioxidants protect organisms against the adverse impacts of free radicals, preventing or repairing damage. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) stands out among enzymatic antioxidants, scavenging superoxide radicals (O2•−) by converting them into less harmful molecules31. Various isoforms of SOD are present in distinct cellular compartments. SOD1 (CuZnSOD) serves as the primary superoxide scavenger in the cytoplasm, mitochondrial intermembrane spaces, nuclei, and lysosomes, while SOD2 (MnSOD) is located within the mitochondria32. Catalase, another crucial enzyme in intracellular defense against oxidative stress, is predominantly located in peroxisomes and cardiac mitochondria. It plays a vital role in breaking down H2O2 into water and oxygen, thus preventing its accumulation33. Additionally, glutathione peroxidases (GPXs) and peroxiredoxins (PRDXs) contribute to intracellular defenses against H2O2. These enzymes catalyze the reduction of H2O2 using reduced glutathione (GSH) as a cofactor, thereby detoxifying it and protecting cells from oxidative damage34. Hence, the coordinated action of these intracellular defense mechanisms helps to maintain cellular redox neutralisation and the protection of cells against oxidative stress-induced damage, which is implicated in various diseases.
For years, estrogen (E2) has been primarily produced in the gonads, occasionally in the adrenal cortex, under brain signaling. Estradiol, or E2, the primary type of estrogen, forms when testosterone is converted by aromatase, mainly in the ovaries and other glands. E2 enters the bloodstream, known for its reproductive role as a gonadal sex hormone35. However, it has become evident that the synthesis and impacts of E2 extend beyond reproductive tissues. E2 is synthesized locally through aromatase in various non-reproductive tissues and across the nervous system, induces significant, diverse effects on the development, maturation, and function within the nervous system36. Indeed, E2 has neuroprotective properties in the retina, protecting against excitotoxic cell death and retinal damage in humans. Furthermore, E2 influences eye anatomy, function, and the development of numerous ocular conditions37. Alteration in E2 levels caused by ageing or hormone therapy are linked to neurodegenerative retinal disorders and visual impairments38. Interference with estrogenic whether through medical interventions or exposure to environmental endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs), can directly or indirectly impact the visual system. Early exposure to these disruptors during development may result in long-term adverse effects39.
To achieve this, the zebrafish has been considered a suitable vertebrate animal model to study oxidative stress dynamics40 and visual neuroscience41. Due to its genetic conservation and similarity in retinal structure with other vertebrate species, the zebrafish is an ideal model for studying the human visual system42.. The zebrafish, a prolific breeder, lays transparent embryos that remain see-through until 7 days post-fertilization (dpf), enabling real-time observation of neurogenesis. Consequently, the early development of the zebrafish visual system, including the retina, is extensively documented43. The zebrafish serves as a model system offering numerous advantages for studying cellular and genetic processes throughout vertebrate development and disease44.
In this study, our objective was to investigate the impact of H2O2 exposure on zebrafish visual development system, encompassing both morphological and molecular parameters. Through our research, we sought to elucidate whether these effects are primarily mediated by oxidative stress, aiming to gain deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms involved in these processes.
Materials and methods
Maintenance of zebrafish
Zebrafish wildtypes (Danio rerio) were obtained from Academia Sinica and housed in 40-L tanks at a constant temperature of 28 °C, following a light cycle of 14 h of light and 10 h of darkness. They were fed a standard diet of commercial pellets daily and supplemented with brine shrimp twice a day at 9:00 am and 5:00 pm. To facilitate mating, adult wild-type females and males were placed in a mating box at a ratio of 2:1 and separated by a partition to acclimate to their environment. The following day at 9:00 am, the partition was removed, allowing the zebrafish to mate under light stimulation. Eggs were harvested 30 min post-spawning, subjected to washing in circulating system water to remove dead embryos and impurities. Fertilized eggs were then rinsed in embryo medium (EM) containing 0.004% CaCl2, 0.163% MgSO4, 0.1% NaCl, and 0.003% KCl. Subsequently, they were evenly distributed into 6-well plates, with 30 embryos placed in each well containing 8 mL of EM, and maintained at a constant temperature of 28 °C. All procedures involving zebrafish were conducted in accordance with local animal welfare regulations and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of NPUST (approval No. NPUST-105–067).
Exposure experiments
H2O2 and glutathione (GSH) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and prepared as stock solutions at concentrations of 100 mM and 10 mM, respectively, in distilled water. These stock solutions were then diluted with embryo medium (EM) to achieve the desired concentrations of H2O2 (0.02, 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 12.5, and 62.5 mM) for the experiment. Zebrafish embryos were exposed from 2 h post-fertilization (hpf) to 7 days post-fertilization (dpf) in 6-well plates, with 30 embryos in each well and three replicates per group. The exposed embryos were maintained at 28 °C, with exposure solutions changed daily. Dead embryos were removed immediately and zebrafish survival and hatching rates were observed every 24 h.
Eye and body length measurement
Zebrafish embryos at 48 hpf were used for eye to body length measurement. At 48 hpf, the zebrafish eye undergoes crucial development, forming key structures such as the lens, retina, and optic nerve. This stage is vital for early eye development and the detection of abnormalities45. According to published protocol46, the entire eye diameter was assessed as the distance between the pigmented epithelium of one pole to the opposite pole, aligned with the spine. Body length was measured from the snout tip to the end of the spine before the caudal. The eye-to-body length ratio was assessed under a microscope (Leica 58APO) from the lateral view, and the data were converted into millimeters (mm). Each group was examined with ten embryos, and the experiments were replicated three times using eggs obtained from distinct spawns.
Apoptosis cell assay
Apoptosis in the retina was conducted by using acridine orange (AO) staining at 48 hpf. Embryos were immersed in 5 µg/ml acridine orange (acridinium chloride hemi-[zinc chloride], Sigma Aldrich) in EM for 30 min and kept in the dark at 28 °C. Subsequently, embryos were rinsed repeatedly with EM, anesthetized with 0.016% tricaine, and positioned laterally before being mounted on a slide glass with 0.5% gel agarose. Apoptosis was examined using a fluorescent microscope (Leica M165 FC), with a focus on the eyes. The areas of apoptosis cell with fluorescent AO positivity were quantified using ImageJ software. Each group was examined with ten embryos, and the experiments were replicated three times using eggs obtained from distinct spawns.
Visual behavior assay
The optomotor response (OMR) was conducted for the visual behavior, which involves the movement of the head or body. OMR is effective in detecting abnormalities in visual function47. At 7 dpf, zebrafish larvae have developed enough to perform coordinated swimming movements, which makes it a suitable time point to assess motor activity and behavioral responses48. This method was adapted from a previously published protocol49. Zebrafish at 7 dpf were positioned in a specially designed petri dish containing five tracks (0.5 cm × 7 cm per track; Fig. 1) and were then incubated on a white screen for 30 s with light intensity at 825 nm. A study revealed that the visual behavior observed in zebrafish assays was responsive to light wavelengths spanning from 825 to 910 nm50. During the test, a white and black bars animation was presented moving both upward and downward at the same set of fixed speeds as a stimulus for the zebrafish, and the response was recorded for 30 s before and after measurement. All individuals moving in the following direction of the stimulus during the measurement are considered to demonstrate a positive OMR. The response of the zebrafish following the animation as indicated as positive OMR then measured in terms of swimming distance. Each group was examined with ten embryos, and the experiments were replicated three times using eggs obtained from different spawns.
Real-time PCR
Zebrafish embryos were exposed to nitrate and nitrite, and total RNA was extracted at 48 hpf (n = 20 per treatment group). Quantitative PCR was utilized to assess the expression levels of pair box protein (pax6α and pax6β), tumor protein 53 (tp53), caspase 3 (casp3), BCL2 associated X, apoptosis regulator a (bax), b-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2α (bcl2α), superoxide dismutase-1 (sod1), catalase (cat), glutathione peroxidase 1a (gpx1a), estrogen receptor (ERs) (esr1, esr2α, and esr2β), ovarian and brain aromatases (cyp19a1a and cyp19a1b, respectively), and elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (eef1a1) were determined using quantitative PCR. The eef1a1 was used as an internal control. The specific primer used in this experiment are detailed in Table 1. Real-time PCR was carried out using KAPA SYBR FAST PCR reagent and an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system. The cycling profile included enzyme activation at 95 °C for 3 min, denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s, followed by annealing/primer extension for 40 cycles with denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s.
Ethics approval
The protocols for fish experiments were implemented according to local animal welfare regulations and approved (approval No. NPUST-105–067) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of NPUST. The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of all data was conducted through one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post hoc test, utilizing the SigmaPlot 12.5 package for Windows. A significance level of P < 0.05 was applied in all analyses to identify significant differences between the treatments.
Results
Effects of H2O2 on survival and hatching rate
The study investigated the impact of different concentrations of H2O2 on the survival of zebrafish embryos and larvae over time, as depicted in Fig. 2A. While 0.02 mM showed no toxicity, 0.1 mM and 0.5 mM H2O2 showed toxicity, resulting in mortality rates of 14.4% and 37.8%, respectively, at 168 hpf. Higher concentrations of H2O2 (2.5 mM, 12.5 mM, and 62.5 mM) resulted in 100% mortality, with survival declining rapidly from 24 to 168 hpf. Consequently, 0.02 mM, 0.1 mM, and 0.5 mM of H2O2 will be further examined for their impact on zebrafish visual development. These results indicate that zebrafish development is sensitive to H2O2 in a time- and dose-dependent manner.
The hatching rates of zebrafish embryos exposed to varying concentrations of H2O2 at different developmental stages are presented in Fig. 2B. The results indicated a dose-dependent effect of H2O2 on the hatching rate under laboratory conditions. Compared to the control group, 0.02 mM of H2O2 did not impact the hatching rate up to 168 hpf. However, 0.1 mM and 0.5 mM H2O2 significantly delayed embryo hatching and exhibited toxicity.
Effects of H2O2 on the eye to body length ratio
To determine whether H2O2 has a deleterious effect on zebrafish visual development, embryos were exposed to varying concentrations of H2O2 (0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 mM). As shown in Fig. 3A, exposure to 0.1 and 0.5 mM of H2O2 significantly decreased the eye-to-body length ratio at 48 hpf, Interestingly, the reduction induced by 0.1 mM of H2O2 was fully reversed upon the addition of GSH (Fig. 3B).
Effects of exposure to H2O2 and co-exposure to GSH on visual system. Eye to body length ratio was measured at 48 hpf: exposure to 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 mM H2O2 (A), and co-exposure to 50 μM GSH with 0.1 mM H2O2 (B) (n = 10). Representative image of lateral views of apoptotic cells within the retina of live zebrafish embryos was observed at 48 hpf using AO staining: exposure to 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 mM H2O2 (C), and co-exposure to 50 μM GSH with 0.1 mM H2O2 (D). Apoptosis signals were indicated by green fluorescent spotted (dot) on the retina. Area of apoptotic cells in the retina was measured at 48 hpf: exposure to 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 mM H2O2 (E), and co-exposure to 50 μM GSH with 0.1 mM H2O2 (F) (n = 10). Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. Different symbols in each graph indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). The experiments were repeated 3 times with different cohorts of eggs.
Effects of H2O2 on the apoptosis in retina
An increase in fluorescence in the GFP channel correlates with increased AO staining and increased cell death in the embryo. Exposure to H2O2 at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.5 mM resulted in an increased the fluorescent AO positive cells (Fig. 3C) and area of apoptotic cells in the retina at 48 hpf (Fig. 3E). Notably, the augmentation induced by 0.1 mM of H2O2 was completely reversed upon the addition of GSH, as depicted in Fig. 3D,F.
Effects of H2O2 on visual behavior
Exposure to H2O2 affected zebrafish visual development at 48 hpf. To evaluate whether this change influenced visual behavior, OMR testing was conducted at 7 dpf. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in OMR swimming distance following exposure to 0.1 and 0.5 mM of H2O2, as depicted in Fig. 4A. The decrease induced by 0.1 mM of H2O2 was completely reversed by the addition of GSH (Fig. 4B).
Effects of exposure to H2O2 and co-exposure to GSH on OMR assay. OMR was measured at 7 dpf: exposure to 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 mM H2O2 (A), and co-exposure to 50 μM GSH with 0.1 mM H2O2 (B) (n = 10). Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. Different symbols in each graph indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). The experiments were repeated 3 times with different cohorts of eggs.
Effects of H2O2 on gene expression
Exposure to H2O2 at 0.1 mM significantly decreased the relative expression of genes associated with visual development, pax6α and pax6β at 48 hpf, and these effects were significantly reversed by addition of GSH (Fig. 5A,B). The relative gene expression of tp53, casp3 and bax significantly increased, while bcl2a was decreased, and these effects were also significantly reversed by the addition of GSH (Fig. 5C–F). As for antioxidant-related genes, exposure led to a significant decrease in the relative expression of sod1, cat and gpx1α, and these effects were significantly reversed by the addition of GSH (Fig. 5G–I). In terms of ERs, exposure to H2O2 significantly reduced the relative expression levels of esr1, esr2α, and esr2β, with the effects reversed upon GSH addition (Fig. 5J–L). Similarly, exposure resulted in a significant reduction in the relative expression levels of aromatase genes, cyp19a1a and cyp19a1b, which were also reversed by the addition of GSH (Fig. 5M,N).
Effects of exposure to H2O2 and co-exposure to GSH on gene expression at 48 hpf measured by real-time PCR. Embryos were exposed to 0.1 mM H2O2 alone, or together with 50 μM GSH (n = 20 per treatment group). Relative expressions of genes related to eye development (A and B), apoptosis (C–F), antioxidant (G and I), ERs (J–L), aromatases (M and N). Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. Different symbols in each graph indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). The experiments were repeated 3 times with different cohorts of eggs.
Discussion
Our study demonstrated the adverse impacts of H2O2 exposure on various aspects of zebrafish visual development. We observed detrimental effects on survival and hatching rate, eye to body length ratio, apoptotic cell in the retina, OMR swimming behaviour and genes related to eye development, apoptosis, antioxidant and estrogen signalling. Notably, our findings revealed a dose-dependent relationship, with significant effects observed starting from a concentration of 0.1 mM H2O2. Another study in common carp showed tissue-specific responses to H2O2 exposure, affecting immune, inflammatory, autophagic, and DNA damage pathways at 0.2 mM to 1 mM H2O2 concentrations51. Additionally, exposure to H2O2 concentrations ranging from 0 to 100,000 nM impacted the locomotion and metabolism of both zebrafish larvae and adults52. It's noteworthy that this concentration range falls within the spectrum of H2O2 levels found in aquatic environments such as lake, river, rain, estuary, and open ocean, ranging from 0.004 μM to 199 μM9. During the algal bloom period, levels exceeding 10,000 nM of H2O2 have been observed53. These results indicate the potential ecological relevance and implications of H2O2-induced toxicity in aquatic organisms like zebrafish.
To ascertain whether an eye is proportionally large relative to the subject's overall body size, eye to body length ratio were measured. Exposure to H2O2 resulted in a reduction of the eye-to-body length ratio in zebrafish at 48 hpf. This aligns with our observations, as previous research has utilized zebrafish to assess body length ratios, indicating that eye size is indeed proportionally correlation to overall body size46. Similarly, in other species, eye size has been shown to be tightly regulated relative to overall body size54,55, yet many animal models with eye defects exhibit abnormal body sizes56. Therefore, the decrease in eye size observed in zebrafish exposed to H2O2 may be correlated with a reduction in body length. This correlation suggests that the effects of H2O2 exposure extend beyond the visual system, potentially impacting overall growth and development in zebrafish. It's plausible that the oxidative stress induced by H2O2 could disrupt normal physiological processes, leading to alterations in both eye size and body length.
Apart from its significance as a biological phenomenon, the detection of apoptotic processes has been implicated in a wide range of diseases. Our research findings indicate that exposure to H2O2 resulted in an increase in the positive area of apoptotic cells in the retina of zebrafish at 48 hpf, as observed through AO staining. AO is a fluorescent dye binds to nucleic acids, specifically DNA and RNA, by intercalating between the base pairs and is utilized to investigate apoptosis in zebrafish and other model organisms. This property allows AO to stain DNA and RNA molecules, making them visible under a fluorescence microscope57. The observed increase in the positive area of AO fluorescence cells following exposure to H2O2 is correlated with elevated cell death. Thus, our study demonstrates that exposure to H2O2 leads to increased apoptotis in zebrafish retina at 48 hpf.
To investigate the impact of H2O2 exposure on visual behavior, we conducted the OMR assay. The OMR is an innate visuomotor reflex observed in zebrafish, where the fish aligns its swimming direction with a high-contrast visual stimulus to stabilize its position relative to the stimulus. This assay is commonly employed to assess changes in vision-related behaviors58. Utilizing the OMR task in zebrafish has proven effective in detecting visual abnormalities induced by genetic mutations and toxin exposure59,60. Our study revealed that exposure to H2O2 resulted in reduced swimming behavior in response to the positive directions of the OMR stimulus. This finding implies that defects caused by H2O2 exposure may contribute to abnormal visual behavior, suggesting a potential association between H2O2 exposure and visual impairments.
Exposure significantly altered relative genes expression involved in eye development, apoptosis, antioxidant and estrogen signalling were assessed by qPCR at 48 hpf. Pax6 is essential for the development of the eye in numerous species, including flies, zebrafish, mice, and humans61. Furthermore, pax6 is expressed in neuronal progenitor cells within the regeneration process of the adult zebrafish retina62,63. Zebrafish possess two paralogous pax6 genes, pax6α and pax6β, which encode functionally redundant proteins responsible for regulating the formation and differentiation of the retina and lens64. The knockdown of either pax6α and pax6β resulted in the disruption of retinal regeneration in zebrafish65. Reduced expression of pax6 has been associated with the loss of eye function66. Our results align with this finding, demonstrating a significant decrease in the expression of both pax6α and pax6β following exposure to H2O2. This suggests that the exposure may impair eye function, potentially contributing to the abnormalities observed in visual behavior as detected by the OMR assay.
Our study demonstrated that exposure to H2O2 elevated cell death in the retina at 48 hpf. The tp53 gene is a well-known tumor suppressor gene responsible for regulating both cell proliferation and cell death in response to DNA damage67. Various DNA-damaging agents have been demonstrated to elevate zebrafish tp53 transcription68 and enhance tp53 protein levels69. There is substantial evidence indicating that death signals triggered by tp53 lead to the activation of caspases. Multiple studies have been carried out to clarify the function of caspase activation in cell death mediated by tp5370,71,72,73. Transcripts for caspase-3 are present during early embryogenesis74. Additionally, caspase-3 is a key player in the advancement of apoptosis, resulting in changes in cell morphology and DNA fragmentation. Our study demonstrated that exposure to H2O2 increased tp53 and caps3, indicating that cell death induced by H2O2 follows an apoptotic mechanism. This implies that the cellular response to H2O2 involves the activation of apoptotic pathways mediated by tp53 and caps3, which play crucial roles in regulating programmed cell death. Moreover, mitochondria play a significant role in one of the primary pathways for caspase activation. Bcl-2 suppresses apoptosis and enhances cell survival, while bax operates within the mitochondria to trigger the production of cytochrome c, initiating the caspases activation75. In the present study, H2O2 reduced bcl2α expression and increased bax, indicating the involvement of mitochondria in H2O2-induced apoptosis, leading to developmental defects in the visual system of zebrafish.
H2O2 has the capacity to initiate apoptosis via diverse mechanisms through generating oxidative stress76. Oxidative stress arises from an imbalance between ROS production and the ability of the body's antioxidant defenses to neutralize them. In this study, H2O2 exposure induced alterations in antioxidant-related genes such as sod1, cat, and gpx1a. SOD1, part of the SOD family, crucial endogenous antioxidant enzymes that serve as the primary defense against ROS within cells. It catalyses the dismutation of superoxide into H2O2 and oxygen, thus reducing the harmful effects of superoxide anion. Catalase or glutathione peroxidase detoxify H2O2 and convert it into water. Catalase efficiently breaks down H2O2, while glutathione peroxidase also aids in converting H2O2 into water and oxygen. Glutathione peroxidases, particularly GPx1, have been associated with both the onset and prevention of various common and complex diseases77. Studies have shown that gpx1 provide protection against apoptosis triggered by oxidative stress78, while also decreasing the expression bax (pro-apoptotic protein)79. We demonstrated that H2O2 reduced the expression of sod1, cat, and gpx1a, while increased the pro-apoptotic gene. This suggests a decrease in antioxidant capacity and an increased vulnerability to oxidative stress, which could trigger apoptosis, or programmed cell death, potentially contributing to visual dysfunction during zebrafish development.
Oxidative stress plays a significant role in influencing E2 signaling pathways by modulating the activity of estrogen receptors (ERs)80. E2, crucial for various physiological functions, is synthesized from testosterone through the action of the aromatase enzyme81. In zebrafish, two distinct aromatase genes are present: cyp19a1a, which encodes ovarian aromatase found in the gonads, and cyp19a1b, which encodes brain aromatase found in neural tissues such as the brain and retina36,82. The physiological effects of estrogen primarily occur through its binding to two types of ERs. Zebrafish possess two types of ERs, namely Erα and Erβ, which are encoded by three distinct genes: esr1, esr2α, and esr2β83. While E2 might possess an essential role in maintaining eye health, the exact mechanisms are still not fully understood. Nevertheless, hormone replacement therapies have been linked to lower rates of eye diseases like glaucoma, AMD, and cataracts, indicating that estrogen could be important for eye health84. The impact of oxidative stress induced by H2O2 exposure on the expression of ERs (esr1, esr2α, and esr2β) and aromatases (cyp19a1a and cyp19a1b) in zebrafish was examined. Our results demonstrated that H2O2 decreased the expression of ERs (esr1, esr2α, and esr2β) and aromatases (cyp19a1a and cyp19a1b), likely due to the influence of excessive oxidative stress production induced by H2O2. Previous studies have highlighted the pivotal role of E2 in eye development and function, as evidenced by the presence of aromatase in the retina and ERs distributed across various retinal layers in different vertebrate species85,86. The oxidative stress induced by H2O2 exposure may lead to decreased estrogen production, potentially impacting visual function in zebrafish, given the importance of estrogen for maintaining visual development. Therefore, understanding the impact of oxidative stress on estrogen-related pathways is critical for elucidating the mechanisms underlying visual development and potential implications for visual disorders.
Interestingly, co-incubation of GSH effectivity reversed the impact of H2O2 on most parameters, suggesting that oxidative stress mediates these effects. Glutathione serves as a vital antioxidant pivotal in mitigating oxidative stress within cellular environments. Its principal function involves the neutralization of ROS and shielding cells from oxidative damage77. This principal function of GSH involves the scavenging of ROS, including hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide radicals (O2•-), and peroxyl radicals (ROO•), which are generated during oxidative stress conditions. By donating an electron to these highly reactive species, GSH effectively neutralizes them and prevents them from causing oxidative damage to cellular structures such as lipids, proteins, and DNA87. Prior research indicates that providing glutathione helps protect cells from oxidative stress-induced damage88. Conversely, reduced levels of glutathione, which lead to the impairment of the glutathione-dependent enzyme pathway, are linked to the development and advancement of numerous diseases89. Therefore, the addition of GSH unequivocally illustrated that the impact of H2O2 on zebrafish visual development is mediated through oxidative stress. In some cases, GSH alone alter genes expression, suggesting that antioxidants might affect gene regulation by modulating pathways associated with the response to oxidative stress. Numerous investigations have also demonstrated that bursts of oxidant generation, as well as significant variations in the responses of several antioxidant defences, are strongly related with changes in gene expression across a range of tissues from genetically distinct organisms90,91. GSH effectively mitigates oxidative stress and reduces the risk of cellular damage and apoptosis77. Therefore, the protective effects of GSH in zebrafish exposed to H2O2 are attributed to its dual role in free radical quenching and antioxidant activity, which collectively help maintain cellular integrity and promote survival under oxidative stress conditions.
Conclusion
In summary, our study showed that exposure to H2O2 triggers oxidative stress, resulting in adverse effects on the visual development of zebrafish, including changes in eye-to-body length ratios, apoptotic activity in the retina, and altered OMR responses. These alterations are linked to the excessive oxidative stress, resulting in apoptosis, antioxidant imbalance, reduced estrogen production, and impaired zebrafish visual development. These findings demonstrate the critical role of oxidative stress in mediating adverse effects on visual function and development, emphasising the importance of antioxidant defenses in protecting against such harmful effects.
Data availability
Data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Ray, P. D., Huang, B. W. & Tsuji, Y. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell. Signal. 24, 981–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.008 (2012).
Scully, N. M., McQueen, D. J. & Lean, D. R. S. Hydrogen peroxide formation: The interaction of ultraviolet radiation and dissolved organic carbon in lake waters along a 43–75°N gradient. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 540–548. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.3.0540 (1996).
Petasne, R. G. & Zika, R. G. Hydrogen peroxide lifetimes in south Florida coastal and offshore waters. Mar. Chem. 56, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(96)00072-2 (1997).
Kang, C.-M., Han, J.-S. & Sunwoo, Y. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations in the ambient air of Seoul Korea. Atmos. Environ. 36, 5509–5516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00667-2 (2002).
Cooper, W. J., Saltzman, E. S. & Zika, R. G. The contribution of rainwater to variability in surface ocean hydrogen peroxide. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 92, 2970–2980. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC03p02970 (1987).
Jawad, A., Chen, Z. & Yin, G. Bicarbonate activation of hydrogen peroxide: A new emerging technology for wastewater treatment. Chin. J. Catal. 37, 810–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61100-7 (2016).
Overton, K. et al. The use and effects of hydrogen peroxide on salmon lice and post-smolt Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 486, 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.041 (2018).
Cooper, W. J. & Zika, R. G. Photochemical formation of hydrogen peroxide in surface and ground waters exposed to sunlight. Science 220, 711–712. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.711 (1983).
Ndungu, L. K. et al. Hydrogen peroxide measurements in subtropical aquatic systems and their implications for cyanobacterial blooms. Ecol. Eng. 138, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.011 (2019).
Kieber, R. J. & Helz, G. R. Temporal and seasonal variations of hydrogen peroxide levels in estuarine waters. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 40, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1995.0034 (1995).
Fujiwara, K., Ushiroda, T., Takeda, K., Kumamoto, Y.-I. & Tsubota, H. Diurnal and seasonal distribution of hydrogen peroxide in seawater of the Seto Inland Sea. Geochem. J. 27, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.27.103 (1993).
Sakugawa, H., Kaplan, I. R., Tsai, W. & Cohen, Y. Atmospheric hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24, 1452–1462. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00080a002 (1990).
Tort, M. J., Jennings-Bashore, C., Wilson, D., Wooster, G. A. & Bowser, P. R. Assessing the effects of increasing hydrogen peroxide dosage on rainbow trout gills utilizing a digitized scoring methodology. J. Aquatic Animal Health 14, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8667(2002)014%3c0095:ATEOIH%3e2.0.CO;2 (2002).
Roque, A., Yildiz, H. Y., Carazo, I. & Duncan, N. Physiological stress responses of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) exposure. Aquaculture 304, 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.024 (2010).
Mansour, A. T. et al. Dietary supplementation of drumstick tree, Moringa oleifera, improves mucosal immune response in skin and gills of seabream, Sparus aurata, and attenuates the effect of hydrogen peroxide exposure. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 46, 981–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-020-00763-2 (2020).
Nindl, G., Peterson, N. R., Hughes, E. F., Waite, L. R. & Johnson, M. T. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on proliferation, apoptosis and interleukin-2 production of Jurkat T cells. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 40, 123–128 (2004).
Foyer, C. H. & Noctor, G. Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: Signaling, acclimation, and practical implications. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11, 861–905. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2008.2177 (2009).
Lubos, E., Loscalzo, J. & Handy, D. E. Glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antiox. Redox Signal. 15, 1957–1997. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3586 (2010).
Wijeratne, S. S., Cuppett, S. L. & Schlegel, V. Hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative stress damage and antioxidant enzyme response in Caco-2 human colon cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 8768–8774. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0512003 (2005).
Pizzino, G. et al. Oxidative stress: Harms and benefits for human health. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 8416763. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8416763 (2017).
Wu, J. Q., Kosten, T. R. & Zhang, X. Y. Free radicals, antioxidant defense systems, and schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 46, 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.02.015 (2013).
Taniyama, Y. & Griendling, K. K. Reactive oxygen species in the vasculature. Hypertension 42, 1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000100443.09293.4F (2003).
Aydemir, D., Sarayloo, E. & Nuray, U. N. Rosiglitazone-induced changes in the oxidative stress metabolism and fatty acid composition in relation with trace element status in the primary adipocytes. J. Med. Biochem. 39, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.2478/jomb-2019-0041 (2020).
Aydemir, D. et al. Impact of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease on the biomechanical properties and oxidative stress metabolism of the lung tissue correlated with the human mutant sod1g93a protein accumulation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.810243 (2022).
Yamashita, M. Apoptosis in zebrafish development. Compar. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 136, 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2003.08.013 (2003).
Eimon, P. M. & Ashkenazi, A. The zebrafish as a model organism for the study of apoptosis. Apoptosis 15, 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-009-0432-9 (2010).
Storer, N. Y. & Zon, L. I. Zebrafish models of p53 functions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001123 (2010).
Kim, R. Recent advances in understanding the cell death pathways activated by anticancer therapy. Cancer 103, 1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20947 (2005).
Cory, S. & Adams, J. M. The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc883 (2002).
Negron, J. F. & Lockshin, R. A. Activation of apoptosis and caspase-3 in zebrafish early gastrulae. Dev. Dynam. 231, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20124 (2004).
Forman, H. J. & Zhang, H. Targeting oxidative stress in disease: Promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 20, 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00233-1 (2021).
Faraci, F. M. & Didion, S. P. Vascular protection: superoxide dismutase isoforms in the vessel wall. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24, 1367–1373. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000133604.20182.cf (2004).
Sharifi-Rad, M. et al. Lifestyle, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Back and forth in the pathophysiology of chronic diseases. Front. Physiol. 11, 694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00694 (2020).
Brigelius-Flohé, R. & Maiorino, M. Glutathione peroxidases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1830, 3289–3303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.11.020 (2013).
McCarthy, M. M. Estradiol and the developing brain. Physiol. Rev. 88, 91–124. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00010.2007 (2008).
Menuet, A. et al. Expression and estrogen-dependent regulation of the zebrafish brain aromatase gene. J. Comp. Neurol. 485, 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20497 (2005).
Cascio, C. et al. 17beta-estradiol synthesis in the adult male rat retina. Exp. Eye Res. 85, 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2007.02.008 (2007).
Cascio, C., Deidda, I., Russo, D. & Guarneri, P. The estrogenic retina: The potential contribution to healthy aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases of the retina. Steroids 103, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2015.08.002 (2015).
Cohen, A., Popowitz, J., Delbridge-Perry, M., Rowe, C. J. & Connaughton, V. P. The role of Estrogen and thyroid hormones in zebrafish visual system function. Front. Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.837687 (2022).
Fang, L. & Miller, Y. I. Emerging applications for zebrafish as a model organism to study oxidative mechanisms and their roles in inflammation and vascular accumulation of oxidized lipids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 53, 1411–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.004 (2012).
Xie, J., Jusuf, P. R., Bui, B. V. & Goodbourn, P. T. Experience-dependent development of visual sensitivity in larval zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 9, 18931. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54958-6 (2019).
Gestri, G., Link, B. A. & Neuhauss, S. C. The visual system of zebrafish and its use to model human ocular diseases. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 302–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20919 (2012).
Bilotta, J. & Saszik, S. The zebrafish as a model visual system. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 19, 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-5748(01)00050-8 (2001).
Chhetri, J., Jacobson, G. & Gueven, N. Zebrafish–on the move towards ophthalmological research. Eye 28, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.19 (2014).
Richardson, R., Tracey-White, D., Webster, A. & Moosajee, M. The zebrafish eye—a paradigm for investigating human ocular genetics. Eye 31, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.198 (2017).
Collery, R. F., Veth, K. N., Dubis, A. M., Carroll, J. & Link, B. A. Rapid, Accurate, and Non-Invasive Measurement of Zebrafish Axial Length and Other Eye Dimensions Using SD-OCT Allows Longitudinal Analysis of Myopia and Emmetropization. PLOS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110699 (2014).
Najafian, M., Alerasool, N. & Moshtaghian, J. The effect of motion aftereffect on optomotor response in larva and adult zebrafish. Neurosci. Lett. 559, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.072 (2014).
Basnet, R. M., Zizioli, D., Taweedet, S., Finazzi, D. & Memo, M. Zebrafish Larvae as a Behavioral Model in Neuropharmacology. Biomedicines 22, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7010023 (2019).
Neuhauss, S. C. Behavioral genetic approaches to visual system development and function in zebrafish. J. Neurobiol. 54, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10165 (2003).
Shcherbakov, D. et al. Sensitivity differences in fish offer near-infrared vision as an adaptable evolutionary trait. PLoS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064429 (2013).
Jia, R. et al. Immune, inflammatory, autophagic and DNA damage responses to long-term H2O2 exposure in different tissues of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Sci. Total Environ. 757, 143831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143831 (2021).
Yoon, H. et al. Toxicity impact of hydrogen peroxide on the fate of zebrafish and antibiotic resistant bacteria. J. Environ. Manag. 302, 114072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114072 (2022).
Yoon, H., Kim, H.-C. & Kim, S. Long-term seasonal and temporal changes of hydrogen peroxide from cyanobacterial blooms in fresh waters. J. Environ. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113515 (2021).
Yin, G. et al. Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: the Beijing Eye Study. PLoS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043172 (2012).
Prashar, A. et al. Common determinants of body size and eye size in chickens from an advanced intercross line. Exp. Eye Res. 89, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2009.02.008 (2009).
Ritchey, E. R. et al. Vision-guided ocular growth in a mutant chicken model with diminished visual acuity. Exp. Eye Res. 102, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2012.07.001 (2012).
Smirnova, A. et al. Increased apoptosis, reduced Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and altered tail development in zebrafish embryos exposed to a human-relevant chemical mixture. Chemosphere 264, 128467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128467 (2021).
Orger, M. B., Smear, M. C., Anstis, S. M. & Baier, H. Perception of Fourier and non-Fourier motion by larval zebrafish. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1128–1133. https://doi.org/10.1038/80649 (2000).
Gould, C. J., Wiegand, J. L. & Connaughton, V. P. Acute developmental exposure to 4-hydroxyandrostenedione has a long-term effect on visually-guided behaviors. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 64, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2017.10.003 (2017).
LeFauve, M. K. et al. Using a variant of the optomotor response as a visual defect detection assay in zebrafish. J. Biol. Methods https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2021.341 (2021).
Xu, S. et al. The proliferation and expansion of retinal stem cells require functional Pax6. Dev. Biol. 304, 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.021 (2007).
Raymond, P. A., Barthel, L. K., Bernardos, R. L. & Perkowski, J. J. Molecular characterization of retinal stem cells and their niches in adult zebrafish. BMC Dev. Biol. 6, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213x-6-36 (2006).
Thummel, R. et al. Characterization of Müller glia and neuronal progenitors during adult zebrafish retinal regeneration. Exp. Eye Res. 87, 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.07.009 (2008).
Blader, P. et al. Conserved and acquired features of neurogenin1 regulation. Development 131, 5627–5637. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01455 (2004).
Thummel, R. et al. Pax6a and Pax6b are required at different points in neuronal progenitor cell proliferation during zebrafish photoreceptor regeneration. Exp. Eye Res. 90, 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2010.02.001 (2010).
Klann, M. & Seaver, E. C. Functional role of pax6 during eye and nervous system development in the annelid Capitella teleta. Dev. Biol. 456, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.08.011 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. p53 regulates apoptotic retinal ganglion cell death induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate. Mol. Vis. 8, 341–350 (2002).
Langheinrich, U., Hennen, E., Stott, G. & Vacun, G. Zebrafish as a model organism for the identification and characterization of drugs and genes affecting p53 signaling. Curr. Biol. 12, 2023–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01319-2 (2002).
Lee, K. C. et al. Detection of the p53 response in zebrafish embryos using new monoclonal antibodies. Oncogene 27, 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210695 (2008).
Müller, M. et al. p53 activates the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) gene in response to DNA damage by anticancer drugs. J. Exp. Med. 188, 2033–2045. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.188.11.2033 (1998).
Ding, H. F. et al. Oncogene-dependent regulation of caspase activation by p53 protein in a cell-free system. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28378–28383. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.43.28378 (1998).
Yu, Y. & Little, J. B. p53 Is involved in but not required for ionizing radiation-induced caspase-3 activation and apoptosis in human lymphoblast cell lines1. Cancer Res. 58, 4277–4281 (1998).
Henkels, K. M. & Turchi, J. J. Cisplatin-induced apoptosis proceeds by caspase-3-dependent and -independent pathways in cisplatin-resistant and -sensitive human ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 59, 3077–3083 (1999).
Yabu, T., Kishi, S., Okazaki, T. & Yamashita, M. Characterization of zebrafish caspase-3 and induction of apoptosis through ceramide generation in fish fathead minnow tailbud cells and zebrafish embryo. Biochem. J. 360, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3600039 (2001).
Colman, M. S., Afshari, C. A. & Barrett, J. C. Regulation of p53 stability and activity in response to genotoxic stress. Mutat. Res. 462, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5742(00)00035-1 (2000).
Xin, X., Gong, T. & Hong, Y. Hydrogen peroxide initiates oxidative stress and proteomic alterations in meningothelial cells. Scientific Reports 12, 14519. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18548-3 (2022).
Handy, D. E. & Loscalzo, J. The role of glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 188, 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.06.004 (2022).
Kayanoki, Y. et al. The protective role of glutathione peroxidase in apoptosis induced by reactive oxygen species. J. Biochem. 119, 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021313 (1996).
Faucher, K. et al. Overexpression of human GPX1 modifies Bax to Bcl-2 apoptotic ratio in human endothelial cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 277, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-005-5075-8 (2005).
Yau, C. & Benz, C. C. Genes responsive to both oxidant stress and loss of estrogen receptor function identify a poor prognosis group of estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R61. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2120 (2008).
Simpson, E. R. & Davis, S. R. Minireview: Aromatase and the Regulation of Estrogen Biosynthesis—Some New Perspectives. Endocrinology 142, 4589–4594. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.11.8547 (2001).
Kishida, M. & Callard, G. V. Distinct cytochrome P450 aromatase isoforms in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain and ovary are differentially programmed and estrogen regulated during early development. Endocrinology 142, 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.2.7928 (2001).
Bardet, P. L., Horard, B., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Laudet, V. & Vanacker, J. M. Characterization of oestrogen receptors in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 28, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1677/jme.0.0280153 (2002).
Ogueta, S. B., Schwartz, S. D., Yamashita, C. K. & Farber, D. B. Estrogen receptor in the human eye: influence of gender and age on gene expression. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 1906–1911 (1999).
Callard, G. V., Tchoudakova, A. V., Kishida, M. & Wood, E. Differential tissue distribution, developmental programming, estrogen regulation and promoter characteristics of cyp19 genes in teleost fish. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 79, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0760(01)00147-9 (2001).
Gelinas, D. & Callard, G. V. Immunocytochemical and biochemical evidence for aromatase in neurons of the retina, optic tectum and retinotectal pathways in goldfish. J. Neuroendocrinol. 5, 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.1993.tb00533.x (1993).
Lu, S. C. Glutathione synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1830, 3143–3153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.008 (2013).
Ballatori, N. et al. Glutathione dysregulation and the etiology and progression of human diseases. Biol. Chem. 390, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/bc.2009.033 (2009).
Deponte, M. The incomplete glutathione puzzle: just guessing at numbers and figures?. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 27, 1130–1161. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7123 (2017).
Espinosa-Diez, C. et al. Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 6, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.008 (2015).
Hammad, M. et al. Roles of oxidative stress and nrf2 Signaling in pathogenic and non-pathogenic cells: A possible general mechanism of resistance to therapy. Antioxidants 12, 1371 (2023).
Acknowledgements
F. Saputra was supported by MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology, Japan) scholarship.
Funding
This study was partially supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) 108-2313-B-020-005-MY3, Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FS, SYH, and MK contributed to the study conception and design. FS conducted experimental work and data analysis. SYH and MK supervised and reviewed the data. The first draft was written by FS. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Saputra, F., Kishida, M. & Hu, SY. Oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide disrupts zebrafish visual development by altering apoptosis, antioxidant and estrogen related genes. Sci Rep 14, 14454 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64933-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64933-5
- Springer Nature Limited