Abstract
Despite the historical position of the F-expansion method as a method for acquiring exact solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs), this study highlights its superiority over alternative auxiliary equation methods. The efficacy of this method is demonstrated through its application to solve the convective–diffusive Cahn–Hilliard (cdCH) equation, describing the dynamic of the separation phase for ternary iron alloys (Fe–Cr–Mo) and (Fe–X–Cu). Significantly, this research introduces an extensive collection of exact solutions by the auxiliary equation, comprising fifty-two distinct types. Six of these are associated with Weierstrass-elliptic function solutions, while the remaining solutions are expressed in Jacobi-elliptic functions. I think it is important to emphasize that, exercising caution regarding the statement of the term ’new,’ the solutions presented in this context are not entirely unprecedented. The paper examines numerous examples to substantiate this perspective. Furthermore, the study broadens its scope to include soliton-like and trigonometric-function solutions as special cases. This underscores that the antecedently obtained outcomes through the recently specific cases encompassed within the more comprehensive scope of the present findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nonlinear equations constitute a pivotal tool in the modeling of intricate phenomena within the domain of nonlinear sciences. In recent decades, the scientific community, comprising physicists and mathematicians, has elucidated the proficiency of nonlinear differential equations in representing a myriad of nonlinear occurrences across a spectrum of applied sciences. These encompass optics, optical fibers, birefringent fibers, plasma physics, elastic media, geology, human biology, fluid dynamics, ecology, engineering, fluid mechanics, applied mathematics, computer science, medicine, and diverse other disciplines1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. The Cahn–Hilliard (CH) model10,11,12,13,14 assumes a fundamental role in elucidating phase separation phenomena within physical systems, notably in the context of alloys. Noteworthy is the recent resurgence of interest in the CH equation, as it demonstrates applicability in modeling the dynamics of fluid separation under specific conditions. This resurgence underscores the universal applicability and scientific significance of nonlinear equations in capturing intricate phenomena across diverse scientific domains.
This investigation focuses on scrutinizing Weierstrass-elliptic function solutions and Jacobi-elliptic function solutions applicable to the CH equation. The methodology employed involves the utilization of the F-expansion method15,16,17. Our analysis encompasses the derivation of soliton-like solutions, Weierstrass-elliptic functions, and solutions characterized by hyperbolic and trigonometric functions within the framework of the cdCH equation. The mathematical expression governing the CH equation is presented according to the formula19,20,21
where \(N_x(x,t)\) and \(N_{Cr}(x,t)\) represent the attractive regions of features X and Cr respectively, the system (1) takes on the following form
The regular solution model facilitates the expression of indigenous free energy through the following relation
where the symbols \(M^{*}\), \(M^{**}\), and \(M^{***}\) represent the energies associated with Fe, Cr, and X respectively, while \(\Theta _{FeCr}, \Theta _{FeX},\) and \(\Theta _{CrX}\) serve as integration parameters. Additionally, T denotes absolute temperature, and R stands for the gas constant. The formulation (3) is a direct outcome of this framework
The assessment of gradient energy and mobility entails employing the cdCH equation for binary iron alloys, exemplified by (Fe-Cr) and (Fe-X). Subsequently, these equations can undergo a linearization process for further analysis as
The cdCH equation can be expressed as
Following Eq. (6), the cdCH equation can be formulated as follows
Here, \(F(\Psi )\), \(\Psi (x,t)\), and \(g(\Psi )\) signify the mobility, attentiveness, and homogeneous free energy, respectively. Eq. (7) can be expressed as
In this context, the term \(A(\Psi (x,t))\) signifies the chemical potential, \(\Psi (x,t)\) denotes the concentration of one of the two phases in a system undergoing phase separation, and \(\nu D(x,t)\) characterizes the phase transition influenced by the continuous fluid flow.
Utilizing the subsequent traveling wave transformation to Eq. (8) given by
with the wave velocity denoted as c, the result is the following ordinary differential equation (ODE)
Twice integration of (10) reveals
An overview of the F-expansion method
To explore exact solutions for nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs), we state an algorithm for the F-expansion method15,16,17,18. For a given nonlinear PDE with independent variables x and t, and dependent variable \(\Psi\)
Assuming \(\Psi (x,t)=W(\delta )\), where the wave variable \(\delta =x-ct\), the nonlinear PDE in Eq. (12) is thereby reduced to an ODE
Next, we seek solutions for the ODE in the following form
Here, \(\eta _i\), (where \(i=0,1,\,2,\ldots ,\phi\)) represents constants to be determined, and \(\phi\) is a positive integer that can be determined by balancing the nonlinear terms \(W^3\) with linear term \(W''\). Additionally, \(G(\delta )\) satisfies the following auxiliary equation
where \(\sigma =\pm 1\), and \(X,\,Y,\) and Z are constants. Consequently, the last equation is satisfied for \(G(\delta )\)
In Tables 1 and 2, we present fifty two types of exact solutions for Eq. (15) (refer to15,16,17,18 for detailed information). Notably, these exact solutions can be employed to systematically construct additional exact solutions for Eq. (7).mobility, attentiveness, and homogeneous free
Exact Jacobi-elliptic function solutions
Balancing the nonlinear term \(W^3\) with the linear term \(W''\) results in \(\phi =1\). Thus, based on Eq. (14), we can make the following selection
where \(\eta _0\) and \(\eta _1\) represent undetermined constants. By substituting Eqs. (17) and (15) into Eq. (7) and subsequently equating the coefficients of \(G^j(\delta )G'(\delta )\), \(j=0,1,2,\ldots ,5,\) a system of algebraic equations for \(\eta _0,\,\,\eta _1,~\eta _2\) and \(\alpha\) is followed
Upon solving the aforementioned overdetermined system with the assistance of Mathematica, the solutions are determined as follows
Substituting these results into Eq. (17), we have the following formal solution of Eq. (7)
Utilizing Table 1 and the formal solution (20), it becomes possible to deduce more comprehensive combined Jacobian-elliptic function solutions for Eq. (7). Consequently, the following exact solutions are derived.
Class 1: \(X=\varrho ^2,\,\,Y=-(1+\varrho ^2),\,\,Z=1,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {sn}}\delta ,\)
Class 2: \(X=\varrho ^2,\,\,Y=-(1+\varrho ^2),\,\,Z=1,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {cd}}\delta ,\)
Class 3: \(X=-\varrho ^2,\,\,Y=2\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Z=1-\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {cn}}\delta ,\)
Class 4: \(X=-1,\,\,Y=2-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=\varrho ^2-1,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {dn}}\delta\)
Class 5: \(X=1,\,\,Y=-(1+\varrho ^2),\,\,Z=\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {ns}}\delta ,\)
Class 6: \(X=1,\,\,Y=-(1+\varrho ^2),\,\,Z=\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {dc}}\delta ,\)
Class 7: \(X=1-\varrho ^2,\,\,Y=2\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Z=-\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {nc}}\delta ,\)
Class 8: \(X=\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Y=2-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=-1,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {nd}}\delta ,\)
Class 9: \(X=1-\varrho ^2,\,\,Y=2-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=1,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {sc}}\delta ,\)
Class 10: \(X=-\varrho ^2(1-\varrho ^2),\,\,Y=2\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Z=1,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {sd}}\delta ,\)
Class 11: \(X=1,\,\,Y=2-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=1-\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {cs}}\delta ,\)
Class 12: \(X=1,\,\,Y=2\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Z=-\varrho ^2(1-\varrho ^2),\,\,G(\delta )={\text {ds}}\delta ,\)
Class 13: \(X=1/4,\,\,Y=(1-2\varrho ^2)/2,\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {ns}}\delta \pm {\text {cs}}\delta ,\)
Class 14: \(X=(1-\varrho ^2)/4,\,\,Y=(1+\varrho ^2)/2,\,\,Z=(1-\varrho ^2)/4,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {nc}}\delta \pm {\text {sc}}\delta ,\)
Class 15: \(X=1/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2-2)/2,\,\,Z=\varrho ^2/4,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {ns}}\delta \pm {\text {ds}}\delta ,\)
Class 16: \(X=\varrho ^2/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2-2)/2,\,\,Z=\varrho ^2/4,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {sn}}\delta \pm i\,{\text {cn}}\delta ,\)
Class 17: \(X=\varrho ^2/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2-2)/2,\,\,Z=\varrho ^2/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{1-\varrho ^2}{\text {sd}}\delta \pm {\text {cd}}\delta ,\)
Class 18: \(X=1/4,\,\,Y=(1-\varrho ^2)/2,\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\varrho \,{\text {cd}}\delta \pm i\,\sqrt{1-\varrho ^2}{\text {nd}}\delta ,\)
Class 19: \(X=1/4,\,\,Y=(1-2\varrho ^2)/2,\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\varrho \,{\text {sn}}\delta \pm i\,{\text {dn}}\delta ,\)
Class 20: \(X=1/4,\,\,Y=(1-\varrho ^2)/2,\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{1-\varrho ^2}{\text {sc}}\delta \pm i\,{\text {dc}}\delta ,\)
Class 21: \(X=(\varrho ^2-1)/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2+1)/2,\,\,Z=(\varrho ^2-1)/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\varrho \,{\text {sd}}\delta \pm {\text {nd}}\delta ,\)
Class 22: \(X=\varrho ^2/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2-2)/2,\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {sn}}\delta }{1\pm {\text {dn}}\delta },\)
Class 23: \(X=-1/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2+1)/2,\,\,Z=(1-\varrho ^2)^2/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\varrho \,{\text {cn}}\delta \pm {\text {dn}}\delta ,\)
Class 24: \(X=(1-\varrho ^2)^2/4,\,\,Y=(\varrho ^2+1)/2,\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )={\text {ds}}\delta \pm {\text {cs}}\delta ,\)
Class 25: \(X=\frac{\varrho ^4(1-\varrho ^2)}{2(2-\varrho ^2)},\,\,Y=\frac{2(1-\varrho ^2)}{\varrho ^2-2},\,\,Z=\frac{1-\varrho ^2}{\varrho ^2-1},\,\,G(\delta )={\text {dc}}\delta \pm \sqrt{1-\varrho ^2}{\text {nc}}\delta ,\)
Class 26: \(Z=\frac{\varrho ^2Y^2}{(\varrho ^2+1)^2X},\,\,Y<0,\,\,X>0,\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{\frac{-\varrho ^2Y}{(\varrho ^2+1)X}}{\text {sn}}\bigg (\sqrt{\frac{-Y}{\varrho ^2+1}}\delta \bigg ),\)
Class 27: \(Z=\frac{(1-\varrho ^2)Y^2}{(\varrho ^2-2)^2X},\,\,Y>0,\,\,X<0,\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{\frac{Y}{(2-\varrho ^2)X}}{\text {dn}}\bigg (\sqrt{\frac{Y}{2-\varrho ^2}}\delta \bigg ),\)
Class 28: \(Z=\frac{\varrho ^2(\varrho ^2-1)Y^2}{(2\varrho ^2-1)^2X},\,\,Y>0,\,\,X<0,\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{\frac{-\varrho ^2Y}{(2\varrho ^2-1)X}}{\text {cn}} \bigg (\sqrt{\frac{Y}{2\varrho ^2-1}}\delta \bigg ),\)
Class 29: \(X=1,\,\,Y=2-4\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=1,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {sn}}\delta \,{\text {dn}}\delta }{{\text {cn}}\delta },\)
Class 30: \(X=\varrho ^2,\,\,Y=2,\,\,Z=1,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {sn}}\delta \,{\text {cn}}\delta }{{\text {dn}}\delta },\)
Class 31: \(X=1,\,\,Y=\varrho ^2+2,\,\,Z=1-2\varrho ^2+\varrho ^4,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {cn}}\delta \,{\text {dn}}\delta }{{\text {sn}}\delta },\)
Class 32: \(X=\frac{A^2(\varrho -1)^2}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{\varrho ^2+1}{2},\,\,Z=\frac{(\varrho -1)^2}{4A^2},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {dn}}\delta \, {\text {cn}}\delta }{A(1+{\text {sn}}\delta )(1+\varrho \,{\text {sn}}\delta )},\)
Class 33: \(X=\frac{A^2(\varrho +1)^2}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{\varrho ^2+1}{2}-3\varrho ,\,\,Z=\frac{(\varrho +1)^2}{4A^2},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {dn}}\delta \, {\text {cn}}\delta }{A(1+{\text {sn}}\delta )(1-\varrho \,{\text {sn}}\delta )},\)
Class 34: \(X=\frac{-4}{\varrho },\,\,Y=6\varrho -\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Z=-2\varrho ^3+\varrho ^4+\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho \,{\text {cn}}\delta \,{\text {dn}}\delta }{\varrho \,{\text {sn}}^2\delta +1},\)
Class 35:\(X=\frac{4}{\varrho },\,\,Y=-6\varrho -\varrho ^2-1,\,\,Z=2\varrho ^3+\varrho ^4+\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho \,{\text {cn}}\delta \,{\text {dn}}\delta }{\varrho \,{\text {sn}}^2\delta -1},\)
Class 36: \(X=1/4,\,\,Y=\frac{1-2\varrho ^2}{2},\,\,Z=1/4,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {sn}}\delta }{1\pm {\text {cn}}\delta },\)
Class 37: \(X=\frac{1-\varrho ^2}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{1+\varrho ^2}{2},\,\,Z=\frac{1-\varrho ^2}{4},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{{\text {cn}}\delta }{1\pm {\text {sn}}\delta },\)
Class 38: \(X=4\varrho _1,\,\,Y=2+6\varrho _1-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=2+2\varrho _1-\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho ^2\,{\text {sn}}\delta \,{\text {cn}}\delta }{\varrho _1-{\text {dn}}^2\delta },\)
Class 39: \(X=-4\varrho _1,\,\,Y=2-6\varrho _1-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=2-2\varrho _1-\varrho ^2,\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{-\varrho ^2\,{\text {sn}}\delta \,{\text {cn}}\delta }{\varrho _1+{\text {dn}}^2\delta },\)
Class 40: \(X=\frac{2-\varrho ^2-2\varrho _1}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{\varrho ^2}{2}-1-3\varrho _1,\,\,Z=\frac{2-\varrho ^2-2\varrho _1}{4},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho ^2{\text {sn}}\delta \,{\text {cn}} \delta }{{\text {sn}}^2\delta +(1+\varrho _1){\text {dn}}\delta -1-\varrho _1},\)
Class 41: \(X=\frac{2-\varrho ^2+2\varrho _1}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{\varrho ^2}{2}-1+3\varrho _1,\,\,Z=\frac{2-\varrho ^2+2\varrho _1}{4},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho ^2{\text {sn}}\delta \,{\text {cn}} \delta }{{\text {sn}}^2\delta +(-1+\varrho _1){\text {dn}}\delta -1-\varrho _1},\)
Class 42: \(X=\frac{C^2\varrho ^4-(B^2+C^2)\varrho ^2+B^2}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{\varrho ^2+1}{2},\,\,Z=\frac{\varrho ^2-1}{4(C^2\varrho ^2-B^2)},\,\, G(\delta )=\frac{\sqrt{\frac{B^2-C^2}{B^2-C^2\varrho ^2}}+{\text {sn}}\delta }{B\,{\text {cn}}\delta +C\,\,{\text {dn}}\delta }.\)
Class 43: \(X=\frac{B^2+C^2\varrho ^2}{4},\,\,Y=\frac{1}{2}-\varrho ^2,\,\,Z=\frac{1}{4(C^2\varrho ^2+B^2)},\,\, G(\delta )=\frac{\sqrt{\frac{B^2+C^2\varrho ^2-C^2}{B^2+C^2\varrho ^2}}+{\text {cn}}\delta }{B\,{\text {sn}}\delta +C\,\,{\text {dn}}\delta }\).
Class 44: \(X=\frac{B^2+C^2}{4} ,\,\,Y=\frac{\varrho ^2}{2}-1,\,\,Z=\frac{\varrho ^4}{4(C^2+B^2)},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\sqrt{\frac{B^2+C^2-C^2\varrho ^2}{B^2+C^2}}+ {\text {dn}}\delta }{B\,{\text {sn}}\delta +C\,\,{\text {cn}}\delta },\)
Class 45: \(X=-(\varrho ^2+2\varrho +1)B^2,\,\,Y=2\varrho ^2+2,\,\,Z=\frac{2\varrho -\varrho ^2-1}{B^2},\,\, G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho \,{\text {sn}}^2\delta -1}{B(\varrho \,{\text {sn}}^2\delta +1)},\)
Class 46: \(X=-(\varrho ^2-2\varrho +1)B^2,\,\,Y=2\varrho ^2+2,\,\,Z=-\frac{2\varrho +\varrho ^2+1}{B^2},\,\, G(\delta )=\frac{\varrho \,{\text {sn}}^2\delta +1}{B(\varrho \,{\text {sn}}^2\delta -1)},\)
Weiestrass-elliptic function solutions
By incorporating the solutions provided in22, as outlined in Table 2, and utilizing Eq. (20), the resulting set of exact solutions is as follows; Class 47: \(f_2=\frac{4}{3}(Y^2-3XZ),\,\,f_3=\frac{4Y}{27}(-2Y^2+9XZ),\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{\frac{1}{X}(\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)-\frac{1}{3}Y)},\)
Class 48: \(f_2=\frac{4}{3}(Y^2-3XZ),\,\,f_3=\frac{4Y}{27}(-2Y^2+9XZ),\,\,G(\delta )=\sqrt{\frac{3Z}{3\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)-Y}},\)
Class 49: \(f_2=\frac{-(5YD+4Y^2+33XYZ)}{12},\,\,f_3=\frac{21Y^2D-63XZD+20Y^3-27XYZ}{216},\,\, G(\delta )=\frac{\sqrt{12Z\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)+2Z(2Y+D)}}{12\wp (x-ct; f_2,f_3)+D},\)
Class 50: \(f_2=\frac{1}{12}Y^2+XZ,\,\,f_3=\frac{1}{216}Y(36XZ-Y^2),\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{\sqrt{Z}[6\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)+Y]}{3\wp '(\delta ; f_2,f_3)},\)
Class 51: \(f_2=\frac{1}{12}Y^2+XZ,\,\,f_3=\frac{1}{216}Y(36XZ-Y^2),\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{3\wp '(\delta ; f_2,f_3)}{\sqrt{X}[6\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)+Y]},\)
Class 52: \(f_2=\frac{2Y^2}{9},\,\,f_3=\frac{Y^3}{54},\,\,G(\delta )=\frac{Y\sqrt{-15Y/2X}\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)}{3\wp (\delta ; f_2,f_3)+Y},\,\,\,Z=\frac{5Y^2}{36X},\)
Soliton-type solutions
Soliton-like solutions of Eq. (7) can be derived in the specific scenario where the modulus \(\varrho\) approaches 1. This is exemplified as follows
It is pertinent to note that the exact solutions \(\Psi _{1}\), \(\Psi _{2},~\cdots \Psi _{52}\) are derived and presented in Eqs. (21)–(72), where the choice of the positive (+ve) and negative (−ve) signs leads to distinct solutions. Additionally, it is worth highlighting that each exact solution provided in Eqs. (21)–(72) can be bifurcated into two solutions by selecting the positive and negative signs, although these variations have not been explicitly computed. Moreover, it should be emphasized that all the exact solutions outlined in Eqs. (21)–(72) can be validated through substitution. Notably, some of these solutions exhibit the incorporation of free parameters, namely X, Y, and Z.
Trigonometric-function solutions
Trigonometric-function solutions for Eq. (7) can be derived in the specific scenario where the modulus \(\varrho\) approaches 0. For instance,
Solitonic dynamics of the cdCH Eq. (7)
This section incorporates a graphical depiction of the attained results and corresponding physical explanations. The determination of exact solutions for the proposed model holds pivotal importance in elucidating diverse waveform manifestations within nonlinear complex structures. Utilizing the prescribed methodologies, the exact solutions are extracted and visually represented in multiple-soliton, soliton, trigonometric, hyperbolic, periodic, Jacobi’s elliptic, and singular wave functions. A soliton23, alternatively designated as a solitary wave, manifests as a self-sustaining wave packet that preserves its configuration during uniform propagation. The genesis of solitons is contingent upon the equilibrium of nonlinear and dispersive influences within the medium. These solitons serve as solutions to a broad category of weakly nonlinear dispersive partial differential equations integral to the modeling of physical and engineering systems. Conversely, a periodic traveling wave emerges as a periodic function in one dimension progressing at a consistent velocity, representing a distinctive spatiotemporal oscillation wherein both spatial and temporal dimensions exhibit periodic behavior. Diverse mathematical equations rely on periodic traveling waves, encompassing self-oscillatory, excitable, and reaction-diffusion-advection systems. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the parameter selection significantly influences the physical characteristics of the derived solutions. To provide a visual insight into these physical properties, 3D, and 2D graphs are generated. These graphical representations contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the observed phenomena.
Figures 1 and 2, contingent upon the judicious selection of parameters, delineate the kink-type and bell-type soliton solutions, respectively. Figure 3 explicates the explicit representation of solitary waves, while Fig. 4 illustrates the singular soliton solution. Moreover, Fig. 5 presents the composite singular soliton solution, and Fig. 6 showcases the complex combo soliton solution. The outcomes of this endeavor are poised to serve as a fount of inspiration and motivation for forthcoming discussions spanning diverse research domains, particularly within the purview of solids engineering.
Conclusions
The F-expansion method has been adeptly employed to derive fifty-two distinct exact solutions classified by the auxiliary equation \(G'(\delta ) = XG^4(\delta ) +YG^2(\delta )+Z\) for the cdCH equation. This mathematical technique holds a notable advantage over alternative methods by encompassing all categories of exact solutions, encompassing Jacobi-elliptic and Weierstrass-elliptic functions. Moreover, it has yielded soliton-like solutions and trigonometric-function solutions as particular instances. The efficacy of the method in offering a diverse array of exact solutions, including those rooted in advanced mathematical functions, underscores its utility in addressing complex nonlinear PDEs, particularly in modeling phase separation dynamics in materials science.
The paper expanded its scope to encompass soliton-like and trigonometric-function solutions as special cases. This demonstrated that the outcomes previously achieved using the recently extended direct algebraic method (Rehman et al.)24, the modified auxiliary equation method (Lu et al.)25, the unified method (Adel et al.)26, and the modified simple equation method (Riaz et al.)27 were specific instances that fell within the more comprehensive context of the current findings. This method can also be further applied to certain NLEEs.
Data availibility
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Nasreen, N., Naveed Rafiq, M., Younas, U. & Lu, D. Sensitivity analysis and solitary wave solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation in dispersive media. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 38(03), 2350227 (2024).
Nasreen, N., Lu, D., Zhang, Z., Akgül, A., Younas, U., Nasreen, S. & Al-Ahmadi, A.N. Propagation of optical pulses in fiber optics modelled by coupled space-time fractional dynamical system. Alex. Eng. J. 73, 173–187 (2023).
Nasreen, N., Younas, U., Sulaiman, T. A., Zhang, Z. & Lu, D. A variety of M-truncated optical solitons to a nonlinear extended classical dynamical model. Results Phys. 51, 106722 (2023).
Hussain, A., Usman, M., Zaman, F. D. & Almalki, Y. Lie group analysis for obtaining the abundant group invariant solutions and dynamics of solitons for the Lonngren-wave equation. Chin. J. Phys. 86, 447–57 (2023).
Hussain, A., Usman, M. & Zaman, F. Lie group analysis, solitons, self-adjointness and conservation laws of the nonlinear elastic structural element equation. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 18(1), 2294554 (2024).
Hussain, A., Ali, H., Usman, M., Zaman, FD. & Park, C. Some new families of exact solitary wave solutions for pseudo-parabolic type nonlinear models. J. Math. 2024 (2024).
Adeyemo, O.D. Applications of cnoidal and snoidal wave solutions via optimal system of subalgebras for a generalized extended (2+1)-D quantum Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation with power-law nonlinearity in oceanography and ocean engineering. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. (2022).
Adeyemo, O. D., Zhang, L. & Khalique, C. M. Optimal solutions of Lie subalgebra, dynamical system, travelling wave solutions and conserved currents of (3+1)-dimensional generalized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation type I. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137(8), 954 (2022).
Adeyemo, O. D., Zhang, L. & Khalique, C. M. Bifurcation theory, lie group-invariant solutions of subalgebras and conservation laws of a generalized (2+1)-dimensional BK equation type II in plasma physics and fluid mechanics. Mathematics 10(14), 2391 (2022).
Choi, J. H. & Kim, H. New exact solutions of the reaction–diffusion equation with variable coefficients via the mathematical computation. Int. J. Biomath. 11(04), 1850051 (2018).
Fabrizio, M., Franchi, F., Lazzari, B. & Nibbi, R. A non-isothermal compressible Cahn–Hilliard fluid model for air pollution phenomena. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 378, 46–53 (2018).
Kunti, G., Mondal, P.K., Bhattacharya, A. & Chakraborty, S. Electrothermally modulated contact line dynamics of a binary fluid in a patterned fluidic environment. Phys. Fluids30(9) (2018).
Wei, L. & Mu, Y. Stability and convergence of a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for the general Lax equation. Open Math. 16(1), 1091–103 (2018).
Zhao, X. & Liu, C. Optimal control for the convective Cahn–Hilliard equation in 2D case. Appl. Math. Optim. 70, 61–82 (2014).
Zhang, S. & Xia, T. A generalized F-expansion method and new exact solutions of Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 183(2), 1190–200 (2006).
Ebaid, A. & Aly, E. H. Exact solutions for the transformed reduced Ostrovsky equation via the F-expansion method in terms of Weierstrass-elliptic and Jacobian-elliptic functions. Wave Motion 49(2), 296–308 (2012).
Zhang, S. & Xia, T. A generalized F-expansion method with symbolic computation exactly solving Broer–Kaup equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 189(1), 836–43 (2007).
Liu, Q. & Zhu, J. M. Exact Jacobian elliptic function solutions and hyperbolic function solutions for Sawada–Kotere equation with variable coefficient. Phys. Lett. A. 352(3), 233–8 (2006).
Scheel, A. Spinodal decomposition and coarsening fronts in the Cahn–Hilliard equation. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 29, 431–64 (2017).
Hongjun, G. & Changchun, L. Instability of traveling waves of the convective–diffusive Cahn–Hilliard equation. Chaos Solit. Fractals 20(2), 253–8 (2004).
Yue, P., Zhou, C. & Feng, J. J. Sharp-interface limit of the Cahn–Hilliard model for moving contact lines. J. Fluid Mech. 645, 279–94 (2010).
Yan, Z. An improved algebra method and its applications in nonlinear wave equations. Chaos Solit. Fract. 21(4), 1013–21 (2004).
Gu, C. (ed.) Soliton Theory and Its Applications. (Springer, 2013).
Rehman, H. U., Ullah, N. & Asjad, M.I. & Akgül, A. Exact solutions of convective–diffusive Cahn–Hilliard equation using extended direct algebraic method. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 39(6), 4517–32 (2023).
Adel, M. Aldwoah, K. Alahmadi, F. & Osman, M.S. The asymptotic behavior for a binary alloy in energy and material science: The unified method and its applications. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. (2022).
Lu, D., Osman, M. S., Khater, M. M., Attia, R. A. & Baleanu, D. Analytical and numerical simulations for the kinetics of phase separation in iron (Fe–Cr–X (X= Mo, Cu)) based on ternary alloys. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 537, 122634 (2020).
Riaz, M. B., Baleanu, D., Jhangeer, A. & Abbas, N. Nonlinear self-adjointness, conserved vectors, and traveling wave structures for the kinetics of phase separation dependent on ternary alloys in iron (Fe–Cr–Y (Y= Mo, Cu)). Results Phys. 25, 104151 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through a large group Research Project under grant number RGP2/105/45.
Funding
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Northern Border University, Arar, KSA for funding this research work through the project number NBU-FFR-2024-1166-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Writing original draft, Akhtar Hussain and Tarek F. Ibrahim; Writing review and editing, Akhtar Hussain., Tarek F. Ibrahim, and F.M. Osman Birkea, Abeer M. Alotaibi; Methodology, Tarek F. Ibrahim, Akhtar Hussain, F.M. Osman Birkea, Bushra R. Al-Sinan and Herbert Mukalazi; Software, Akhtar Hussain and Tarek F. Ibrahim; Supervision, F.M. Osman Birkea and Herbert Mukalazi; Project administration, Herbert Mukalazi; Visualization, Akhtar Hussain, Tarek F. Ibrahim, Abeer M. Alotaibi, and F.M. Osman Birkea; Conceptualization, Akhtar Hussain, Bushra R. Al-Sinan, Abeer M. Alotaibi, Tarek F. Ibrahim and Herbert Mukalazi; Formal analysis, Bushra R. Al-Sinan, Herbert Mukalazi and Akhtar Hussain.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hussain, A., Ibrahim, T.F., Birkea, F.M.O. et al. Exact solutions for the Cahn–Hilliard equation in terms of Weierstrass-elliptic and Jacobi-elliptic functions. Sci Rep 14, 13100 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62961-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62961-9
- Springer Nature Limited