Abstract
Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs, NM-212) are well-known for their catalytic properties and antioxidant potential, and have many applications in various industries, drug delivery, and cosmetic formulations. CeO2 NPs exhibit strong antimicrobial activity and can be used to efficiently remove pathogens from different environments. However, knowledge of the toxicological evaluation of CeO2 NPs is too limited to support their safe use. In this study, CeO2 NPs were orally administered to Sprague Dawley rats for 13 weeks at the doses of 0, 10, 100, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, followed by a four week recovery period. The hematology values for the absolute and relative reticulocyte counts in male rats treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs were lower than those in control rats. The clinical chemistry values for sodium and chloride in the treated male rat groups (100 and 1000 mg/kg/day) and total protein and calcium in the treated female rat groups (100 mg/kg/day) were higher than those in the control groups. However, these changes were not consistent in both sexes, and no abnormalities were found in the corresponding pathological findings. The results showed no adverse effects on any of the parameters assessed. CeO2 NPs accumulated in the jejunum, colon, and stomach wall of rats administered 1000 mg/kg CeO2 NPs for 90 days. However, these changes were not abnormal in the corresponding histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Therefore, 1000 mg/kg bw/day may be considered the “no observed adverse effect level” of CeO2 NPs (NM-212) in male and female SD rats under the present experimental conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs, NM-212) are widely used as automobile exhaust gas purification catalysts, in semiconductor insulation layer polishing, display glass polishing, cosmetics, and solid fuel cells. CeO2 NPs are used as abrasives to flatten the surfaces of mirrors, ophthalmic lenses, electronic wafers, and lenses, and as corrosion inhibitors1,2,3,4. Furthermore, CeO2 NPs are key components of ultraviolet light-blocking materials and play an important role in the oil refining process. CeO2 NPs are most commonly used as additives (catalysts) in diesel to enhance its combustion efficiency5,6. Many efforts have been made to develop safe therapeutics using CeO2 NPs. Recent data suggest that CeO2 NPs may be used as scavengers of reactive oxygen species to protect against cardiomyopathy, neuronal toxicity, and radiation damage7,8,9,10. However, the potentially hazardous health effects of nanosized CeO2 are emerging issues, and publications on the toxicity of nanoparticles are rapidly increasing. Safety issues concerning CeO2 NPs have been increasing and adverse effects of CeO2 NPs are continuously reported11,12.
Furthermore, the impact of oral and inhalation exposure of CeO2 NPs has not been fully determined and has attracted much research interest, including studies on and reports of its adverse effects on cells and organisms13,14,15,16. Moreover, a few in vivo tests have suggested that the bioavailability of CeO2 NPs is too low to exert intrinsic toxicity, especially when nanoparticles are orally administrated17,18. Toxic doses of orally administered nanoparticles were relatively higher than those of generally known toxic chemicals, which may result from the low bioavailability and low concentration of CeO2 NPs in target organs19. In one study, mice were orally administered 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg CeO2 NPs for 14 days, and serum biochemistry, hematology, and histopathological analyses were conducted20. Thus, it is critical to evaluate the safety of CeO2 NPs by performing adequate toxicity studies, given the insufficient toxicological information on CeO2 NPs to support their safe use. In this regard, the use of CeO2 NPs (NM-212) can provide reference data for future studies with different exposure amounts and dosage administration schedules. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the toxicity of orally dosed CeO2 NPs in male and female Sprague Dawley (SD) rats to secure reference data that may be helpful for relevant future studies. The present study was performed in compliance with the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 1997) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS, Korea, 2018).
Materials and methods
Preparation and characterization of CeO2 NPs (NM-212) suspension
CeO2 NPs (NM-212) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany) (Product No. 22390; CAS No. 1306-38-3). CeO2 NPs were suspended in distilled water (DW) (stock concentration of 100 mg/mL) and the particle morphology was observed using TEM (JEM-3000F, 200 kV, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 1). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was also performed (JEM-2100F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 2). CeO2 NPs dispersion in DW is stable more than 5 days (Supplementary Information 3).
Animal husbandry
Five-week-old male (n = 55) and female specific-pathogen-free outbred Sprague Dawley rats (n = 55) supplied by Orient Bio Inc. (Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea). The animals were acclimatized to their new surroundings for seven days. To reduce the body weigh variation blew 10% in each group, one hundred rats were selected and those animals randomly assigned to four groups (one control group and three treatment groups) using the Pristima system (Version 7.3 Xybion Medical System Co., USA). Ten males and 10 females/group were assigned to the four groups (main group), and 5 males and 5 females/group were assigned to the 0 mg/kg (control group) and 1000 mg/kg (high-dose). Those 2 groups (recovery group) were used to check the delayed toxicity or the recovered effects. All animals at terminal sacrifices were euthanized using isoflurane with necropsy. And, remained animals (5 males and 5 females) were euthanized using isoflurane. During the all-study periods, all animals were housed 2–3 per cage and there was attached cage card, described animal information, in each cage. The body weight ranges prior to the start of dosing were 204.6–234.5 g for the males and 158.1–194.1 g for the females. All rats were housed in polycarbonate cages with bedding (Laboratory animal Aspen bedding, Abedd Baltic Ltd., Jelgava, Latvia) throughout the study period and provided sterilized tap water and pelleted food (PMI Nutrition International, USA). The rats were maintained under the following conditions: 12/12 h light/dark cycle, temperature 23 ± 3 °C, relative humidity 50 ± 10%, air ventilation 10–20 times/h, and light intensity 150–300 lx. This study was performed in facilities approved by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. The all experiments were reviewed and approved by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Korea Institute of Toxicology [approval no. 2006–0180] and all experiments were performed according to the ARRIVE guidelines, the guidelines published by the OECD and the GLP regulations for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies of Korea Food Drug Administration21. No linestatistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes, but our sample sizes are based on to those reported in previous test study22. Animal experiments were designed to use all animals for the analysis, except for those that died or suffered from issues related to animal welfare throughout the experiment.
Animal treatment
One hundred rats were divided into four groups, including a control group (n = 15, each sex), and three groups of orally administered CeO2 NPs (low dose: 10 mg/kg bw/day (n = 10, each sex), middle dose: 100 mg/kg bw/day (n = 10, each sex), high dose: 1000 mg/kg bw/day (n = 15, each sex). Dose formulations were administered by oral gavage once daily for 13 consecutive weeks. A daily oral dose of CeO2 NPs (NM-212) was administered to SD rats for 13 weeks (91 days), followed by a four week (28 days) recovery period. The animals of main group were sacrificed at Day 92 and animals of recorvery group were sacrificed at Day 119. Animals were dosed at a volume of 10 mL/kg. The dose volume was calculated based on the most recently measured body weight. Saline (vehicle control) was administered to the rats in the control group. Rats were divided into four groups and subjected to treatment doses of 0, 10, 100, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs, respectively. The effects of the CeO2 NPs were analyzed by clinical observation, body weight measurements, and recording of the rats’ food consumption. Serum chemistry and hematology examinations were performed to assess the clinical pathology of CeO2 NPs. In addition, during necropsy, gross observation, organ weight, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry were performed, and meaningful results were obtained in the stomach, jejunum, and colon.
Mortality and body weight
All measurements and examinations were performed using the Pristima system. The general condition and behavior of the experimental animals were checked once daily throughout the acclimation period. However, during the treatment period and the day before necropsy was performed clinical signs were examined and recorded twice daily (before and after dosing). The animals were weighed on the day of arrival, prior to randomization, before the administration of the first dose, once weekly thereafter, and on the day of necropsy.
Food consumption and ophthalmic examination
Cage food consumption was recorded once during the acclimation period and once weekly during the treatment period. The individual food consumption was calculated and expressed as g/rat/day. External eye examinations were performed on all animals during the acclimation period. However, at week 13 before necropsy both external and fundus examinations of the animals in the control and high-dose (1000 mg/kg bw/day) groups were performed using a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope (Vantage Plus Digital, Keeler Ltd., England). Prior to examination via binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, a mydriatic compound (Midrin-P; Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan) was administered to each eye.
Hematology analysis
All rats were fasted overnight before necropsy and blood samples were collected. Blood samples for hematological and clinical chemistry analyses were collected from the vena cava during necropsy. Samples for hematological analysis were collected in tubes containing EDTA-2 K. The following parameters were analyzed using an ADVIA 2120i hematology analyzer (Siemens, USA): white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, differential leukocyte count (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and large unstained cells), and reticulocyte count. In addition, blood samples treated with 3.2% sodium citrate were analyzed for prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times using an ACL Elite Pro coagulation analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory, Italy).
Biochemical analysis
Blood samples, simultaneously collected into tubes without anticoagulant for hematological and clinical chemistry analyses, were placed at room temperature for at least 90 min, and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature to obtain serum. The levels of glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, total cholesterol, total protein, albumin, albumin/globulin ratio, total cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, creatine kinase, calcium, inorganic phosphorus, sodium, potassium, and chloride were measured using an automatic analyzer (TBA 120FR NEO; Toshiba Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
Gross findings and histopathological examination
After blood sampling, the animals were sacrificed by exsanguination through the vena cava and aorta under isoflurane anesthesia. Complete necropsy was performed on all experimental animals. The absolute weights of the brain, pituitary gland, liver, kidneys, spleen, heart, lungs, thymus, salivary gland, thyroid gland, testes, epididymis, prostate, seminal vesicle, uterus, and ovaries were determined, and relative organ weights (% of terminal body weight) were calculated.
Following detailed external and internal examinations, tissue samples (skin, mammary gland, testes, epididymis, prostate, seminal vesicle, urinary bladder, ovaries, uterus, vagina, spleen, pancreas, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, rectum, kidneys, heart, lungs, adrenal gland, liver, salivary gland, mesenteric lymph node, mandibular lymph node, thyroid gland, aorta, thymus, trachea, tongue, esophagus, sciatic nerve, skeletal muscle, sternum/marrow, femur/joint/marrow, thoracic spinal cord, Harderian gland, brain, pituitary gland, and eyes/optic nerve) were collected from each animal and preserved in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. The eyes and optic nerves were fixed in Davidson’s fixative, whereas the testes were fixed in Bouin’s fixative for approximately 48 h and then transferred to 70% ethanol. Preserved tissues were obtained from animals in the control and high-dose groups.
Immunohistochemistry and histopathological examination
Paraffin-embedded stomach and colon tissues were dewaxed using xylene and a graded alcohol series (100, 95, 70, and 50%). After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the tissues were placed in an antigen retrieval solution (ENZO, Seoul, Korea) and permeabilized with PBS containing Tween-20 (PBST, 1%). After blocking with 5% (v/v) bovine serum albumin in PBST (0.01%), the tissues were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against superoxide dismutase (SOD)-1, SOD-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), and cytochrome C (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). The tissues were then incubated with affinity-purified Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and mounted with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole mounting medium. Finally, images were captured using an inverted phase-contrast fluorescence microscope (IX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, stomach and colon tissues were sectioned, stained with 0.5% periodic acid solution for 5 min, stained with Schiff's reagent for 15 min, and counterstained with hematoxylin solution for 2 min. All steps were performed at room temperature and the tissue sections were examined under a microscope.
Statistical analysis
The data were statistically analyzed using multiple comparison methods. When the Bartlett’s test showed no significant deviations from variance homogeneity, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify differences among group means. A p value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Dunnett’s test was used to determine differences between the control and treatment groups when the data were significant based on ANOVA. Furthermore, when significant deviations from variance homogeneity were observed based on the Bartlett’s test, a non-parametric comparison test, the Kruskal–Wallis (H) test, was performed to determine any group mean differences (p < 0.05). When a significant difference was observed in the Kruskal–Wallis (H) test, the Dunn’s rank sum test was performed to quantify the specific pairs of group data that significantly differed from the mean. The Fisher’s exact test was used to compare pairs of data (including prevalence and percentage). The probability level was set at 1% or 5%. Statistical analyses were performed by comparing the data for the different dose groups with those of the control group, using the Pristima system.
Results
Mortality, clinical observations, and body weight
No treatment-related mortality was observed and no treatment-related apparent adverse clinical findings were documented during the study period. The changes in body weight during the treatment period are shown in Table 1. No treatment-related changes in body weight were observed among the treatment groups (Supplementary Information 1).
Food consumption and ophthalmic examination
No changes or findings in food consumption (Table 2) were observed in any group (Supplementary Information 2). Abnormal ophthalmological findings were not observed in the treated group compared with the vehicle control group (data not shown).
Hematology and serum biochemistry
Male rats treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs exhibited a statistically significant decrease in the absolute and relative reticulocyte counts (%, 0.83-, and 0.83-fold, respectively).
A statistically significant increase in sodium levels (%, 1.01-, and 1.02-fold, respectively) was observed in male rats treated with 100 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs. Male rats treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs exhibited a statistically significant increase in the level of chloride (%, 1.02-fold). Female rats treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs exhibited a statistically significant increase in the levels of total protein (%, 1.07-fold) and calcium (%, 1.05-fold) (Tables 3 and 4).
Organ weights and gross findings
No treatment-related changes in absolute or relative organ weights were observed in any of the experimental male or female rats (Tables 5 and 6). In addition, no treatment-related gross findings were observed at necropsy in any of the treated male or female rats.
Histopathological examination (CeO2 NPs accumulation in the stomach wall)
The results of histopathological examination are shown in Table 7. In males, zona fasciculata vacuolation in the adrenal glands, mononuclear cell infiltration in the heart, tubule basophilia, cysts, mononuclear cell infiltration in the kidneys, mononuclear cell infiltration in the liver, alveolar macrophage aggregation in the lung (with bronchi), acinar cell atrophy, mononuclear cell infiltration in the pancreas, and mononuclear cell infiltration in the prostate were observed in the control and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs groups. In females, mononuclear cell infiltration in the heart and alveolar macrophage aggregation, mononuclear cell infiltration, and pigmented macrophages in the lungs (with bronchi) were observed in the control and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NP groups. The abovementioned histopathological findings were randomly distributed between the control and treated groups, and were considered spontaneous or incidental23. Thus, no consistent treatment-related histopathological lesions were found in either sex.
Accumulation of CeO2 NPs was observed in the jejunum, colon, and stomach wall of rats administered 1000 mg/kg CeO2 NPs for 90 days (Fig. 3).
Histological findings in stomach (A), Jejunum (B), and colon (C). Paraffin sections were obtained from control and the highest dosing (1000 mg/kg/day) rats and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. No remarkable findings were obtained from the 0 mg/kg dosed rat (control) whereas CeO2 NPs accumulation was found at 1000 mg/kg dosed rat (Arrows: Accumulation of CeO2 NPs).
Immunohistochemical examination
In addition, as SOD plays a central role in inhibiting xenobiotic-induced oxidative damage and subsequent apoptosis, we assessed the effects of CeO2 NPs on the expression of SOD1, SOD2, and cytochrome C protein in the colonic tissues of rats in the control and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NP groups. The expression of SOD1, 2, and cytochrome C are observed mainly in chief cells of stomach and apical border of epithelial cell in colon respectively. The expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, and cytochrome C proteins were not significantly different between the control and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NP groups. (Fig. 4).
Periodic acid-Schiff stain (PAS) stained stomach (A) and colon (B) and a comparison of the number of goblet cell per crypt in colon between control and CeO2-administered rats (C). Arrows indicate accumulation of CeO2. Administering of CeO2 didn’t affect PAS-positive mucus layer in stomach and the number of goblet cell number.
The number of goblet cells per crypt in the colon in the control and 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs groups were compared in periodic acid-Schiff stain (PAS)-stained stomach and colon tissues. PAS results showed that the addition of CeO2 NPs did not affect the PAS-positive mucus layer in the stomach or the number of goblet cells (Fig. 5).
Immunofluorescence staining of stomach and colon tissue. Sections of control and highest dosing (1000 mg/kg) group were stained with (A) SOD1, (B) SOD2, and (C) Cytochrome C. The expression of SOD1, 2, and CytC are observed mainly in chief cells of stomach and apical border of epithelial cell in colon respectively. No specific difference were seen in expression of SOD1, SOD2 and CytC in stomach and colon between control and 1000 mg/kg-administered group respectively.
Discussion
CeO2 NPs have many applications in industry, drug delivery, and cosmetic formulations. They are mainly used for grinding glass, lenses, cathode ray tubes, jewelry, and complementary metal oxide semiconductor chips24,25. As CeO2 NPs in suspension have an excellent and well-controlled particle size distribution a very effective surface finish is achieved. Many efforts have been made to develop safe therapeutics using CeNPs26,27,28. Hence, the potentially hazardous health effects of nanoparticles are emerging issues among toxicologists and regulatory authorities. Safety issues concerning CeO2 NPs have been increasing and adverse effects of CeO2 NPs are continuously reported11,12.
In this study, we investigated the repeated toxicity of orally administered CeO2 NPs (NM-212) in rats to elucidate the in vivo toxicity mechanism of the nanoparticles. No dead animals were found during the experimental period (13 weeks after treatment). However, serum biochemical and hematological parameters showed statistically significant changes. The hematology values for the absolute and relative reticulocyte counts in male rats treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day were lower than those in the control group. The clinical chemistry values for sodium and chloride in the treated male groups (100 and 1000 mg/kg/day) and total protein and calcium in the treated female groups (100 mg/kg/day) were higher than those in the control group. The changes in hematological and serum biochemistry values were of little toxicological significance, given the high variability in these values among rats, or among individual values in the same rat29,30,31. Other statistically significant changes in rats were not considered treatment-related because the degree of change was relatively small or the values were within the normal range. Moreover, histopathological analysis confirmed the relatively non-toxic level of CeO2 NPs used in this study29,30,31.
CeO2 NPs was reported to be toxicity by Kumari that the activity of serum ALP was found to be increased significantly at 300 and 600 mg/kg bw/day of CeO2 NPs after 28 days of repeated oral exposure in both male and female rats. And, significant damage of liver was observed as dilated portal tract with exposure to CeO2 NPs in 600 mg/kg dose groups. Splenic hyperplasia was found along with inflammation in brain tissue upon exposure with 600 mg/kg bw/day of CeO2 NPs32. The ALP is the foremost enzyme that is found to increase in liver disease. However, present study was not treatment-related changes in statistically significant for ALP enzyme. Additionally, the other parameters of serum biochemistry related to liver disease was not observed. And, our results was not observed with 1000 mg/kg bw/day of CeO2 NPs-related microscopic finding. In the histopathological study, positive findings, mild focal hemorrhage, and infiltration were randomly distributed between the control and treatment groups and were considered spontaneous or incidental33,34,35,36. Thus, no consistent treatment-related histopathological lesions were detected in either of the groups.
Meanwhile, CeO2 NPs accumulated in the jejunum, colon, and stomach wall of rats administered 1000 mg/kg bw/day CeO2 NPs for 90 days. Safety assessments after CeO2 NP administration have been conducted in previous studies. Most of the orally exposed CeO2 NPs were excreted through feces within 24 h. Other oral CeO2 NP administration studies suggested that oral CeO2 NPs could hardly be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, and that most of the orally administered CeO2 NPs were excreted in feces within a few days13,37,38. Our results also confirmed those of previous studies, showing that CeO2 NPs were not deposited in internal organs after repeated oral administration. Furthermore, we confirmed that CeO2 NPs did not accumulate in the internal organs of rats, and that most of the orally administered CeO2 NPs were excreted in the recovery animals. These changes were not observed in the corresponding histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses.
A significant lack of CeO2 NP toxicity was observed in our study, but these results do not imply that all sized-CeO2 NPs are safe for humans and the environment.
In conclusion, the results of our 13 week repeated-dose toxicity study in male and female SD rats revealed no treatment-related changes in mortality, clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, hematology, clinical chemistry, gross findings at necropsy, or organ weights. Furthermore, ophthalmic examination, urinalysis, histopathological, and immunohistochemical investigations showed no CeO2 NP-related changes. Therefore, 1000 mg/kg bw/day may be considered the ‘no-observed-adverse-effect-level’ of CeO2 NPs (NM-212) in male and female SD rats under the present experimental conditions. However, further investigations on the activities of CeO2 NPs, as well as the chronic toxicity of CeO2 NPs are warranted.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hardman, R. A Toxicological review of quantum dots: Toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environ. Health Perspect. 114(2), 165–172 (2006).
Hirst, S. M. et al. Bio-distribution and in vivo antioxidant effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in mice. Environ. Toxicol. 28, 107–118 (2013).
Priestly, B. G., Harford, A. J. & Rsim, M. R. Nanotechnology: A promising new technology-but how safe?. Med. J. Austrail. 186(4), 187–188 (2007).
González, E. et al. Assessing the effect of CeO2 nanoparticles as corrosion inhibitor in hybrid biobased waterborne acrylic direct to metal coating binders. Polymers (Basel) 13(6), 848 (2021).
Dale, J. G., Cox, S. S., Vance, M. E., Marr, L. C. & Hochella, M. F. Transformation of cerium oxide nanoparticles from a diesel fuel additive during combustion in a diesel engine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51(4), 1973–1980 (2017).
Lv, J., Wang, S. & Meng, B. The effects of nano-additives added to diesel-biodiesel fuel blends on combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine: A review. Energies 15(3), 1032 (2022).
Colon, J. et al. Protection from radiation-induced pneumonitis using cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 5, 225–231 (2009).
Das, M. et al. Auto-catalytic ceria nanoparticles offer neuroprotection to adult rat spinal cord neurons. Biomaterials 28, 1918–1925 (2007).
Niu, J., Azfer, A., Rogers, L. M., Wang, X. & Kolattukudy, P. E. Cardioprotective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a transgenic murine model of cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Res. 73, 549–559 (2007).
Nalabotu, S. K. et al. Role of oxidative stress and apoptosis in the hepatic toxicity induced by cerium oxide nanoparticles following intratracheal instillation in male Sprague-Dawley Rats. J. Toxicol. Risk Assess. 5(2), 1–14 (2019).
Kipen, H. M. & Laskin, D. L. Smaller is not always better: Nanotechnology yields nanotoxicology. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 289, 696–697 (2005).
Kagan, V. E., Bayer, H. & Shvedova, A. A. Nanomedicine and nanotoxicology: Two sides of the same coin. Nanomedicine 1(4), 313–316 (2005).
Park, K. et al. Toxicity and tissue distribution of cerium oxide nanoparticles in rats by two different routes: Single intravenous injection and single oral administration. Arch. Pharmacal. Res. 41(11), 1108–1116 (2018).
Cassee, F. R. et al. Exposure, health and ecological effects review of engineered nanoscale cerium and cerium oxide associated with its use as a fuel additive. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 41(3), 213–229 (2011).
Osmond, M. J. & Mccall, M. J. Zinc oxide nanoparticles in modern sunscreens: An analysis of potential exposure and hazard. Nanotoxicology 4(1), 15–41 (2010).
Dhall, A. & Self, W. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: A brief review of their synthesis methods and biomedical applications. Antioxid. (Basel) 7(8), 97 (2018).
Das, S. et al. Tissue deposition and toxicological effects of commercially significant rare earth oxide nanomaterials: Material and physical properties. Environ. Toxicol. 32(3), 904–991 (2017).
Yokel, R. A., Unrine, J. M., Wu, P., Wang, B. & Grulke, E. A. Nanoceria biodistribution and retention in the rat after its intravenous administration are not greatly influenced by dosing schedule, dose, or particle shape. Environ. Sci. Nano 1(6), 549–560 (2014).
Park, E. J., Park, Y. K. & Park, K. Acute toxicity and tissue distribution of cerium oxide nanoparticles by a single oral administration in rats. Toxicol. Res. 25(2), 79–84 (2009).
Naz, S., Tayyaba, S., Kazmi, B. & Zia, M. CeO2 nanoparticles synthesized through green chemistry are biocompatible: In vitro and in vivo assessment. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 33(5), e22291 (2019).
KFDA. Good Laboratory Practice Regulation for Non-Clinical Laboratory Studies (Notification No. 2017-32) (2017).
Han, H. Y. et al. Toxicity of orally administered food-grade titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J. Appl. Toxicol. 41(7), 1127–1147 (2021).
Boorman, G. A., Eustis, S. L., Elwell, M. R., Montgomery, C. A. & MacKenzie, W. F. Pathology of the Fischer Rat: Reference and Atlas (Academic Press, 1990).
Khorrami, M. B. et al. Antioxidant and toxicity studies of biosynthesized cerium oxide nanoparticles in rats. Int. J. Nanomed. 14, 2915–2926 (2019).
Hasanzadeh, L. et al. Green synthesis of labeled CeO2 nanoparticles with 99mTc and its biodistribution evaluation in mice. Life Sci. 212, 233–240 (2018).
Ma, R. et al. A critical review on visible-light-response CeO2-based photocatalysts with enhanced photooxidation of organic pollutants. Catal. Today. 335(1), 20–30 (2019).
Wason, M. S. & Zhao, J. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: Potential applications for cancer and other diseases. Am. J. Transl. Res. 5(2), 126–131 (2013).
Nourmohammadi, E. et al. Cytotoxic activity of greener synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using carrageenan towards a WEHI 164 cancer cell line. Ceram. Int. 44(16), 19570–19575 (2018).
Derelanko, M. J. & Auletta, C. S. Handbook of Toxicology (CRC Press, 2014).
Han, Z. Z. et al. Reference data of the main physiological parameters in control Sprague-Dawley rats from pre-clinical toxicity studies. Lab. Anim. Res. 26(2), 153–164 (2010).
Lee, J. M. et al. Historical control data from 13-week repeated toxicity studies in Crj: CD (SD) rats. Lab. Anim. Res. 28(2), 115–121 (2012).
Kumari, M., Kumari, S. I. & Grover, P. Genotoxicity analysis of cerium oxide micro and nanoparticles in Wistar rats after 28 days of repeated oral administration. Mutagenesis 29, 467–479 (2014).
Wallig, M. A., Bolon, B., Haschek, W. & Rousseaux, C. Fundamentals of Toxicologic Pathology 3rd edn. (Academic Press, 2017).
Son, W. C. & Gopinath, C. Early occurrence of spontaneous tumors in CD-1 mice and sprague-dawley rats. Toxicol. Pathol. 32(4), 371–374 (2004).
Willard-Mack, C. L. et al. Nonproliferative and proliferative lesions of the rat and mouse hematolymphoid system. Toxicol. Pathol. 47(6), 665–893 (2019).
McInnes, E. F. & Mann, P. Background Lesions in Laboratory Animals: A Color Atlas (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2011).
Lee, J. et al. Safety assessment of cerium oxide nanoparticles: Combined repeated-dose toxicity with reproductive/developmental toxicity screening and biodistribution in rats. Nanotoxicology 14(5), 696–710 (2020).
He, X. et al. Lung deposition and extrapulmonary translocation of nano-ceria after intratracheal instillation. Nanotechnology. 21(28), 285103 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF‑2015M3A7B6027948 and NRF-2021M3A9H3016047) and the Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT) Research Program (No. 1711195881).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.Y.H. designed and carried out overall experiment and drafted the manuscript. B.K.K. and Y.SY. helps in animal experiment and biochemical parameter estimation. J.R. helped in histo-pathology slide preparations. S.M.P., M.S.C., S.K. and M.B.H. helped in performing the characterization of nanoparticles. H.Y.H., J.H.O., T.G.L. and S.Y. helped in final cheek up of drafted manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, HY., Kim, BK., Rho, J. et al. Safety assessment and gastrointestinal retention of orally administered cerium oxide nanoparticles in rats. Sci Rep 14, 5657 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54659-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54659-9
- Springer Nature Limited