Abstract
Two conventional magneto-plasmonic (MP) structures are firstly superimposed with mirror symmetry to form a symmetric MP heterostructure. These two MP components are separated from each other by a noble metallic layer. The unique feature of this novel heterostructure is that both magneto-plasmon modes of the up and down MP portions can be coupled as the spacer becomes thinner. This intertwining effect leads to appearance of a new peak in the angular transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (TMOKE) curve of the heterostructure. This new peak which is reported for the first time in the TMOKE signal, is generally similar to plasmon induced transparency (PIT) phenomenon observed in plasmonic multilayered structures. We entitle this novel effect as “second resonance of TMOKE signal”. More importantly, the occurrence angle and magnitude of the second peak can be controlled by varying the thickness and material of separating layer between two MP parts. Also, the dispersion diagram of the heterostructure shows this coupling so that two branches convert into four branches by reducing the thickness of spacer. Furthermore, coupled oscillators model confirms emergence of the second peak in the TMOKE signal. These results can offer great promise for increasing sensitivity of conventional magneto-optical refractive index sensors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Surface plasmon polariton (SPP) modes are interesting effects which are resulted from the interaction between incident electromagnetic waves and oscillations of the electron plasma located on a metal-insulator interface. The unique capability of SPPs in the incarceration of electromagnetic energy at sub-wavelength scale caused that they have been employed in various applications especially in the plasmonic sensors1,2,3,4,5,6. One type of plasmonic systems containing two semi-infinite metallic layers that separated from each other by thin dielectric layer named Metal-Insulator-Metal (MIM) structures7,8,9,10. When the thickness of dielectric layer is sufficiently large, it behaves like a planar waveguide (WG) and allows the propagation of electromagnetic waves. In this case, when the peak of narrow resonances relevant to the SPPs excitation and the peak of broad resonances relevant to the WG modes occurred in an identical incident angle, one can observe a peak in the angular reflectivity curve, instead of minimum reflection in conventional plasmonic structure. This phenomenon is named plasmon induced transparency (PIT) effect11, borrowed from electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) effect which is firstly observed in quantum mechanical systems and later in other physical systems12,13,14,15,16,17. When the thickness of dielectric layer changes, PIT can convert into fano resonance. In this case, the angle of the resonance peak of WG mode is slightly smaller or larger than that of the SPP resonance peak11. PIT and fano resonance can enhance the sensitivity of standard plasmonic sensors18,19,20.
By inserting a ferromagnetic layer into the plasmonic systems, magneto-plasmonic (MP) structures to be formed21,22,23. In this situation an applied magnetic field can influence the SPP properties24,25. This effect was first investigated theoretically in metals26 and semiconductor-based SPPs27,28,29. On the other hand, the SPP excitations also affected the magneto-optic (MO) properties of the magnetized layer in these MP structures. Both magneto-optical Kerr and Faraday effects are enhanced in MP structures21,22,23,30,31,32,33. MP structures are suitable condidates for improving the sensing properties of sensors34,35,36,37,38,39,40. Similar interacting resonant phenomena like PIT and fano resonance have been observed in MO activity of MP structures41,42. In the Faraday effect as reported in the literature41, the longitudinal magnetized layer can increase the transparency of a trilayer magneto-plasmonic crystal by 24% at \(\lambda =840\, \text{nm}\). In other report a purely plasmonic disk interacts with a magneto-plasmonic superlattice one by an electric dipole which in turn produced by an applied magnetic field perpendicular to the disks. This interaction leads to induced MO activity in the plasmonic disk. Furthermore, at certain wavelengths and thicknesses of the separating layer between these two components the interaction is canceled. This leads to strong reduction in MO activity of the whole system. This inhibition of the resulting MO activity constitutes MO counterpart of the EIT effect42.
In this paper, we numerically demonstrate a new peak that is appeared in the angular transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (TMOKE) curve of symmetric MP heterostructure. This heterostructure contains two identical conventional MP structures which are separated from each other by a noble metallic layer. The new peak is created at the specific incident angle which both MP portions strongly interact with each other. The occurrence angle and magnitude of the new peak strongly depend on the thickness and material of the spacer. Also, coupled oscillators model provides main evidences of the coupling between MO activities of the two MP components which leads to appearance of the second peak in the TMOKE signal of proposed heterostructure.
Results
Here, we focus our attention on the TMOKE configuration. In this case, the magnetization vector is perpendicular to the SPP wave vector and parallel to the interface of the mediums. Presence of an external magnetic field causes that dielectric permittivity of magnetic materials becomes a tensor as follows43:
where \(\varepsilon _{m}\) is permittivity and ig is proportional to magnetization. In this configuration no change in the polarization of the incident light is occurred however the reflected intensity is changed by the incident angle of p-polarized light. The TMOKE signal, \( \Delta R/{R}\), is defined as:
where \(R_{pp}(H=0)\) and \(R_{pp}(\pm H)\) are reflectivities in the absence and presence (± directions) of the external magnetic field, respectively.
First of all, we consider the conventional trilayer MO structure which is containing Au (14 nm), Co (5.7 nm) and Ag (5.8 nm) layers, respectively from up to down over the semi-cylindrical BK7 prism, see Fig. 1a. After this introduction, we propose a MO heterostructure with two ferromagnetic layers which is formed by adding another MP (Co/Au) layer to this conventional MO structure, see Fig. 2a. All the thicknesses of different layers are designed and justified. In order to simulate these structures by COMSOL Multiphysics we utilized the values of \(n_{prism}=1.5151\), \(n_{Au}=0.196+i3.255\) and \(n_{Ag}=0.134+i3.986\)11 for refractive indices of prism, Au and Ag, respectively at incident wavelength of 632.8 nm. Also, the dielectric constant of the Co film is considered as \(\varepsilon _{m}=-10.6+i24.3\) and its MO constant is \(g=0.2-i0.944\)44, respectively. The \(R_{pp}(H=0)\) and \(R_{pp}(\pm H)\) curves versus incident angle are plotted in Fig. 1b and the top frames of Fig. 2b for the conventional and offered structures, respectively. We used these information for producing the TMOKE signal [see Eq. (2)] of each structure, see Fig. 1c and the top portion of Fig. 2c. By comparing these figures, It is easy to see that the TMOKE signal for proposed heterostructure became similar to that of for conventional trilayer MO structure. Now, we gradually reduce the thickness of the Ag layer. The angular reflectivity curves and their resulting TMOKE signals for 9 nm and 3 nm thicknesses of Ag spacer are shown in the middle and bottom frames of Fig. 2b and c, respectively. As the thickness of Ag layer decreases both MP portions, above (Au/Co) and below (Co/Au) this layer, strongly interact with each other and their magneto-plasmon modes are coupled to each other. As a consequent of this process, a new peak appears in the angular TMOKE curve respect to the corresponding one for this structure with thick Ag layer (20 nm), see Fig. 2c. According to Fig. 2c, bottom frames, the new (second) peak in the TMOKE signal is occurred at the same angle at which the transition from maximum to minimum reflectivity take placed, see the corresponding frames in Fig. 2b. However in the conventional trilayer MO structures39,40,45 the angular location of the maximum value of TMOKE signal is the same as the angle in which the minimum reflectivity is occurred. The new peak appeared in the TMOKE signal also occurs in the transition from the maximum and the minimum of TMOKE response of the heterostructure with thick Ag layer (20 nm), see Fig. 2c. We introduce this increasing in the MO activity as a “second resonance of TMOKE signal effect”. According to the above discussion, it can be said that the physical origin of this effect is due to the interaction between both MP parts and coupling their magneto-plasmon modes. To elucidate this process, let us calculate the skin depth \(\delta ={1}/{k_{m}}\)46 of the SPP mode at the first Au/Co interface in the absence and presence of the external magnetic field. For this task, we initially need to obtain the in plane (in x-direction) and out of plane (in z-direction) components of SPP wave vector at this interface. The former is given by:
where \(k_{0}\) is the wave vector of the incident light and \(\theta _{SPP}\) is the incident angle at which the reflectivity becomes minimum. According to the bottom portion of Fig. 2b we extract three angles of SPP excitation as \(\theta _{SPP}(+H)=51.83^{\circ }\), \(\theta _{SPP}(-H)=49.29^{\circ }\) and \(\theta _{SPP}(H=0)=51.08^{\circ }\). Then by using of Eq. (3) we obtain their corresponding SPP wave vectors as \(\beta (+H)\simeq 0.0118 (1/\text{nm})\), \(\beta (-H)\simeq 0.0114 (1/\text{nm})\) and \(\beta (H=0)\simeq 0.0117 (1/\text{nm})\). For the other component of SPP wave vector one can be used47
When the external magnetic field is zero \(g=0\), Eq. (4) is reduced to the corresponding plasmonic interface, \(k_{m}=\sqrt{ \beta ^{2}-k_{0}^{2} \varepsilon _{m}}\)46. Therefore, we calculate \(k_{m}\) for these cases as \(k_{m}(+H)\simeq k_{m}(H=0)\simeq 0.03\,(1/\text{nm})\) and \(k_{m}(-H)\simeq 0.032\,(1/\text{nm})\). Finally the corresponding skin depths are \(\delta (+H)\simeq \delta (H=0)\simeq 33.33\,(\text{nm})\) and \(\delta (-H)\simeq 31.25\,(\text{nm})\). By comparing total thickness (\(t_{total}=13\,\text{nm}\)) of the proposed heterostructure and \(\delta \), it is clear that \(\delta >t_{total}\). Therefore, the excited SPPs at the first Au/Co interface can be tunneled through the structure and induced the SPPs at the second one. This penetration provides the interaction between both MP branches in this heterostructure. In order to better understand this phenomenon we try to describe the behavior of the near field distributions of the x-component of the electric field, \(E_{x}\), and their variations versus z position (at the specific x positions where in the electric field has its maximum value that are shown by the cut lines) of the layers for heterostructure with 3 nm thickness of Ag layer (investigated heterostructure), see Fig. 3.
These quantities are calculated for the first maximum (\(40.26^{\circ }\)), first minimum (\(41.31^{\circ }\)), second maximum (\(47.95^{\circ }\)) and second minimum (\(62.21^{\circ }\)) which are indicated by yellow, black, green and red diamonds, respectively in the bottom frame of Fig. 2c. At the first maximum (yellow frames), most of the electric field is accumulated inside the prism and a few field transmitted through the structure and after refracted at Au/air interface propagated without appreciable reduction. Since the angle of first maximum is smaller than the critical angle at the prism/Au interface, see the bottom frame of Fig. 2b, thus SPPs never to be excited here. At the first minimum (black frames), a very weak evanescent field is generated at prism/Au interface and in turns after penetration is observed at Au/air interface with opposite direction. Since the phase matching condition between incident light and SPPs does not occur and SPPs can not excite at Au/Co interface nearly all of field is trapped in the prism. At the second maximum (green frames), the excited SPPs at the first Au/Co interface tunneled through the structure and induce the SPPs at the second one and both strongly couple with each other. The interference between re-emitted light from these coupled SPPs and the reflected light from the prism/Au interface leads to considerable enhancement of field at Au/air interface. As a consequent of this process second peak appears at TMOKE signal. Finally due to the angle of second minimum is larger than the angle of SPP excitation, the phase matching condition between incident light and SPPs becomes weak. This causes that the field enhanced at the prism/Au interface, see the red frames. Also, these calculating quantities for thick Ag layer and conventional trilayer MO structures are shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. As you can see in Figs. 4 and 5, there is a basic similarity between the features of these structures. But by inspection in the green frames of Fig. 3, the orange frames of Fig. 4 and the violet frames of Fig. 5 it can be understood that the nature of second peak is completely different from both other TMOKE peaks.
Explanation of second resonance of TMOKE by dispersion relation of the investigated heterostructure
Now we are interesting to apply some mathematical manipulation in order to obtain the characteristic equation of this MO heterostructure. For this task we consider the following regions \(z>0\), \(0>z>-b\), \(-b>z>-b-t\), \(-b-t>z>-b-2t\) and \(-2b-t>z\), see Fig. 6a, and obtain the spatial distribution of the electromagnetic field of the SPP associated with each of them. The magnetic fields are defined as
The corresponding electric fields can be obtained through Maxwell’s equations (see Supplementary). The continuity of \(H_{y}\) and \(E_{x}\) at the boundaries of \(z=0\), \(z=-b\), \(z=-b-t\) and \(z=-2b-t\) leads to the \(8\times 8\) matrix (see Supplementary). To have a nontrivial solution, the determinant of the coefficients matrix must be zero that yields the following SPP dispersion relation
where the parameters \(\alpha \) and \(\sigma \) are defined as
Figure 6b shows the dispersion diagram of the investigated heterostructure which is obtained by substituting the quantities of \(\varepsilon _{i}=1-\frac{\omega ^{2}_{pi}}{\omega ^{2}}, k_{i}=\sqrt{\beta ^{2}-\frac{\omega ^{2}}{c^{2}}\varepsilon _{i}} \quad i=1, 2\), \(\varepsilon _{m}=1-\frac{\omega ^{2}_{pm}}{\omega ^{2}}\), \(k_{m}=\sqrt{ \beta ^{2}-\frac{\omega ^{2}}{c^{2}}(\frac{\varepsilon _{m}^{2}-g^{2}}{\varepsilon _{m}}})\) and \(g=\frac{\omega _{pm}^{2}\omega _{c}}{\omega (\omega ^{2}+\omega _{c}^{2})}\) into Eq. (10). Where \(\omega _{p1}\), \(\omega _{p2}\) and \(\omega _{pm}\) are the plasma frequencies of the Au, Ag and Co layers, respectively. \(\omega _{c}=eB/m\) is the cyclotron frequency. e and m are the charge and mass of electron. B is the external magnetic field. The basic four dispersion curves correspond to the SPP excitation at the Au/Co, Co/Ag, Ag/Co and Co/Au interfaces of the heterostructure, from up to down, respectively. As it can be observed in Fig. 6b, by increasing the thickness of Ag layer the coupling between upper and lower SPPs decreases. For a thickness of 120 nm, this coupling is completely canceled and two upper branches of dispersion curve remain. These behaviors confirm the results obtained from the simulations discussed above.
In the limit as \(\beta \) goes to infinity, Eq. (10) is simplified to the following equation
After substituting the parameters \(\varepsilon _{1}\), \(\varepsilon _{2}\), \(\varepsilon _{m}\) and g in Eq. (11), it splits into two equations as follow
As it is shown from Fig. 6b, each two branches of the dispersion curve merge to each other and consequently only two horizontally lines are observed for very large value of \(\beta \). These lines are obtained from the solutions of Eq. (12).
Justification of second resonance of TMOKE signal by classical coupled oscillators model
As we know to elucidate the mechanism of the PIT and fano resonance effects which are occurred in the interacting resonant systems, coupled oscillators model is usually a suitable approach17,20,48,49,50. In the literature reports42, researchers use this mechanical model to discuss something like these effects for the MO activity in the MP nanostructures, with two interacting resonant branches one is purely plasmonic and other is magneto-plasmonic, by considering a neutral mass coupled with a charged mass in the static magnetic field. Accordingly, we utilize this classical model to explain the mechanism of second peak appeared in TMOKE signal. Because our investigated heterostructure has two MP branches,Au/Co and Co/Au, we consider both masses to be charged. In this situation we modeled the first MP portion (Au/Co) and the second one (Co/Au) by charged particles \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\), respectively. Both of them are in a static magnetic field. Coupling (Ag) layer between them is also denoted by a weak spring as schematically shown in Fig. 7. Placing a mass with charge q in an external magnetic field leads to the appearance of a Lorentz force \(F_{l}(t)=q\dot{r}\times B\). Here, due to TMOKE configuration the applied magnetic field (in the y-direction) is perpendicular to the driving external force F(t) (in the x-direction), where interacts with \(q_{1}\) and oscillates it. Then the Lorentz force (in the z-direction) is perpendicular to both driving external force and magnetic field such that the plane of movement of the masses is restricted to the x-z plane. The coupled equations of motion in this model are written as follow:
where the particle positions \(r_{1}\) and \(r_{2}\) are referred to their equilibrium state and restricted to the x-z plane, \(k_{1}\) and \(k_{2}\) are spring constants, \(m_{1}\) and \(m_{2}\) are the masses of the particles and \(k_{12}\) denotes the interaction between them. F is the driving external force which acts on the \(q_{1}\). It is important to note that in the presence of magnetic field the damping terms \(\beta _{i}\) become tensors:
when the external magnetic field is zero and there is only the friction force in a homogeneous medium, \(\beta \) can be considered as a scalar term b for each masses. The Lorentz force is written by:
We assume that the temporal part of the external driving force changes oscillatory (\(e^{-i\omega t}\)) and \(m_{1}=m_{2}=m\). We also consider the frequency relations as below:
where \(\gamma _{i}=b_{i}/m\) and \(\omega _{ci}=q_{i}B/m\). In deriving equations of motion in frequency space, we substitute Eq. (16) into Eq. (13), thus:
where \(f\equiv F/m\). In matrix form we have:
where \(\Omega _{i}^{2}=\omega ^{2}-\omega _{i}^{2}+i\omega \gamma _{i}\). Here, since the first MP portion (Au/Co) of the investigated heterostructure is similar to the second one (Co/Au) we assume that \(\omega _{c1}=\omega _{c2}\) and \(\gamma _{1} =\gamma _{2}\). The solutions of Eq. (18) can be written as follow:
where a, b, c, d and e parameters are defined as: \({\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} a=2\omega _{12}^{2}(-\Omega _{1}\Omega _{2}(\Omega _{1}+\Omega _{2})+\omega ^{2}(\omega _{c1}^{2}\Omega _{2}+\omega _{c2}^{2}\Omega _{1})) +(\omega ^{2}\omega _{c1}^{2}-\Omega _{1}^{2})(\omega ^{2}\omega _{c2}^{2}-\Omega _{2}^{2})+\omega _{12}^{4}((\Omega _{1}+\Omega _{2})^{2}-\omega ^{2}(\omega _{c1}+\omega _{c2})^{2}) ,\\ b=-\omega _{12}^{4}(\Omega _{1}+\Omega _{2})+\Omega _{1}(\omega ^{2}\omega _{c2}^{2} -\Omega _{2}^{2})+\omega _{12}^{2}(\Omega _{2}(2\Omega _{1}+\Omega _{2})-\omega ^{2}\omega _{c2}^{2}),\\ c=\omega (2\omega _{12}^{2}\omega _{c1}\Omega _{2}+\omega _{c1}(\omega ^{2}\omega _{c2}^{2}-\Omega _{2}^{2})-\omega _{12}^{4}(\omega _{c1}+\omega _{c2})) ,\\ d=\omega _{12}^{2}(-\Omega _{1}\Omega _{2}+\omega ^{2}\omega _{c1}\omega _{c2} +\omega _{12}^{2}(\Omega _{1}+\Omega _{2})),\\ e=\omega \omega _{12}^{2}(-\omega _{c2}\Omega _{1}-\omega _{c1}\Omega _{2} +\omega _{12}^{2}(\omega _{c1}+\omega _{c2})). \end{array}\right. }\)
By substituting the suitable values as \(f=1 \; \text{m/s}^{2}\), \(\omega _{c1}=\omega _{c2}=0.01\omega _{2}\), \(\omega _{1}=0.9\omega _{2}\) and \(\gamma _{1}=\gamma _{2}=0.05\omega _{2}\) into Eq. (19) we obtain the oscillation amplitudes versus the frequency of particles along the x- and z-directions, see Fig. 7c–f. According to Fig. 7c,\(\omega _{12}=0.3\omega _{2}\), when we are considering the oscillations of the particles in x direction, coupling between two particles does not take placed well. This can be understood from the different oscillation frequencies of the particles. While we study the oscillations along z direction, see Fig. 7d, the role of the external magnetic field in the coupling between two particles is further revealed so that both particles have the same resonance frequencies. Furthermore, when \(\omega _{12}=0\), see Fig. 7e and f, the oscillation amplitudes of \(q_{2}\) along both of x- and z-directions are vanished and for \(q_{1}\) only one of the peaks is appeared. These results show that the interaction between two particles is canceled. Therefore, these oscillatory behaviors are in a good agreement with the corresponding ones in the TMOKE signal curves, in both cases \(\omega _{12}=0.3\omega _{2}\) (\(t_{Ag}=3 \; \text{nm}\)) and \(\omega _{12}=0\) (\(t_{Ag}=20 \; \text{nm}\)).
Influence of different layers on the second resonance of TMOKE signal characteristics
Effects of replacement of the Co layer with NiFe
In this position, we are interesting to study the influence of replacement of the ferromagnetic layer with another one in the investigated heterostructure. For this purpose, the ultra-soft NiFe with low coercivity and small saturation field was chosen as magnetic layer. The NiFe (81/19) layer has zero magnetostriction and high permeability51. At the first step we replace one of the Co layer with NiFe, refractive index \(n=2.18+i3.73\) and MO constant \(Q=0.0117+i0.0007\)52), see the top and middle structures of Fig. 8a. In the second step both Co layers are replaced with NiFe. It is shown by the bottom structure of Fig. 8a. This replacement leads to change in the permittivity tensor and thus in the second peak characteristics. The angular dependences of \(R_{PP}(\pm H, H=0)\) and their resulting TMOKE signals for three different locations of the NiFe layer which are denoted as \(NiFe^{up}\), \(NiFe^{down}\) and \(NiFe^{both}\) are shown from up to down in Fig. 8b and c, respectively. By comparing angular TMOKE curves in Fig. 8c one can conclude that the magnitude of the second peak for \(NiFe^{up}\) is larger than corresponding one for \(NiFe^{down}\). Due to the imaginary part of diagonal elements of the NiFe permittivity tensor, that are responsible for absorption in the structure, are smaller than corresponding elements in the Co permittivity tensor more evanescent wave can penetrate from up (Au/NiFe interface) to down (Co/Au interface) of the \(NiFe^{up}\) structure. Consequently, the magnitude of second peak increased. Also, by comparing the bottom frames of Figs. 2c and 8c we conclude that the value of second peak for the structure with two Co layers is two order of magnitude larger than that of for \(NiFe^{both}\) structure. This obvious difference in the values of second peak is resulting from the real parts of diagonal elements of the Co permittivity tensor are larger than corresponding elements in the permittivity tensor of NiFe. The total reflectance, transmittance and absorbance for investigated heterostructure and structures with NiFe layer are plotted in Fig. 9. The interesting point for all of the structures is that the transmittance becomes zero after angle of the total internal reflection and in this angle the reflectance and absorbance are maximum and minimum, respectively. On the contrary, the maximum of the absorbance occurs exactly at the same angle in which reflectivity becomes minimum (SPP excitation angle).
Effects of incorporation of SiO2 and graphene spacers
Now, we study the effects of incorporation of different layers on the interaction strength between two MP parts of the investigated heterostructure and finally on the second resonance of TMOKE signal characteristics. Firstly, we intercalate SiO2 (\(n_{\text{SiO}_{2}}=1.457\)11) spacer inside the investigated heterostructure such that two trilayer MO structures are above and below of this spacer layer, see the top frame of Fig. 10a. We examine different thicknesses of the spacer and find that the maximum value of second peak occurs at an optimum thickness of 27 nm. Going one step further, we incorporate a graphene monolayer with 0.34 nm thickness instead of the \(\text{SiO}_{2}\) layer, see the middle frame of Fig. 10a. The refractive index of graphene in the visible region for this thickness is given by \(n=3.0+ic_{1}\lambda /3\) where \(\lambda \) is wavelength of the incident light and \(c_{1}=5.446 \; \upmu \text{m}^{-1}\)53. The choice of graphene as separating layer was due to the fact that in the presence of a graphene monolayer, the intensity of SPP considerably enhances54. At the end of this investigation task we insert combination of the \(\text{SiO}_{2}\) and graphene spacers into investigated heterostructure, see the bottom frame of Fig. 10a. The reflectivity curves with and without external magnetic field as a function of incident angle and the resulting TMOKE signal for these structures are shown from top to bottom in Fig. 10b and c, respectively. By comparing different parts of Fig. 10c it is clear that in the presence of a graphene monolayer, the magnitude of second peak is larger than corresponding quantity of other proposed heterostructures.
Theoretical analysis of the sensor response of proposed heterostructures
As we know the plasmonic sensors based on the PIT and fano resonance effects have higher sensitivity than the conventional surface plasmon resonance sensors. Therefore, it is predicted that the appeared second peak in TMOKE signal of MP heterostructures also can improve the performance of the conventional MO refractive index sensors. For calculating sensitivity of the intensity-interrogated sensor which is changed by refractive index of the sensing medium in the Kretschmann configuration, it is better to use the following formula39,55,56,57:
where S is the sensor signal (either optic or magneto-optic). In the our particular case, S is the value of the second peak that occurred at its corresponding angle, \(\theta \), for each \(n_{d}\). \(n_{d}\) is the refractive index of the sensing medium. According to Eq. (20), the sensitivity has two contributions, the slope of the angular TMOKE curve, \(\partial S / \partial \theta \) and angular displacements of this curve when the refractive index changes, \(\partial \theta / \partial n_{d}\). We change refractive index of the medium surrounding the sensor from \(n_{d}=1\) to \(n_{d}=1.010\) by step of \(\Delta n=0.002\) and extract these two contributions for three types of the our proposed heterostructures, see Fig. 11. The sensitivities of these structures, which are obtained by substituting these two contributions in Eq. (20), are listed in Table 1. We compare these results by data reported in the literatures for conventional MO structures, see Table. 1.
According to right column of Table 1 it is easy to see that the our proposed heterostructures are more sensitive than conventional MO structures.
Discussion
We first proposed a symmetric MO heterostructure with two identical MP parts that separated from each other by a noble metallic layer in the Kretschmann configuration. When the separating layer was thick, the angular TMOKE curve of this heterostructure became similar to the corresponding one for the conventional trilayer MO structure. By decreasing the thickness of this layer, the interaction between two MP portions increased as a consequent, a new peak appeared in the TMOKE signal compared to the previous case. We introduced this new peak as a second resonance of TMOKE signal. We also studied the effects of the replacement of magnetic layer with another one and insertion of different spacers between two MP branches of the investigated heterostructure. In order to elucidate the occurrence mechanism of the second resonance we obtained dispersion relation of the basic heterostructure and plotted it. For small thicknesses of the spacer, the dispersion diagram exhibitted four branches which correspond to the SPP excitation at the four interfaces of the heterostructure. This behavior shows the coupling between magneto-plasmon modes of the two MP components. Gradually, as the thickness of spacer increases, the interaction between two MP portions decreases and both magneto-plasmon modes uncoupled so that only two upper branches are remained. Furthermore, we calculated the electric field distribution along the SPP propagation at the angle of second peak and compared it with the corresponding distribution at the angle of maximum TMOKE signal for the conventional structure and proposed heterostructure with thick separating layer. This task demonstrated that the nature of second peak was completely different from two another maximums. We also established a perfect analogy between investigated heterostructure and the coupled oscillators model. This analogy allows us to conclude that the appearance of the second peak in the TMOKE signal is direct result of the coupling between MO activities of the both MP parts. By simulation we demonstrated that the coupling between two magneto-plasmon modes of the upper and lower MP parts causes the sensitivity of the refractive index sensors significantly increases compared to the corresponding conventional MO sensors based on the TMOKE signal.
Methods
Fabrication process
There are no fabrication challenges for construction of the proposed heterostructuers. For example, the fabrication steps of the first proposed heterostructure are depicted in different parts of Fig. 12.
Data availability
The calculated results during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Brolo, A. G., Gordon, R., Leathem, B. & Kavanagh, K. L. Surface plasmon sensor based on the enhanced light transmission through arrays of nanoholes in gold films. Langmuir 20, 4813–4815 (2004).
Gordon Ii, J. & Ernst, S. Surface plasmons as a probe of the electrochemical interface. Surf. Sci. 101, 499–506 (1980).
Nylander, C., Liedberg, B. & Lind, T. Gas detection by means of surface plasmon resonance. Sens. Actuators 3, 79–88 (1982).
Liedberg, B., Nylander, C. & Lunström, I. Surface plasmon resonance for gas detection and biosensing. Sens. Actuators 4, 299–304 (1983).
Homola, J., Yee, S. S. & Gauglitz, G. Surface plasmon resonance sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 54, 3–15 (1999).
Garoli, D., Yamazaki, H., Maccaferri, N. & Wanunu, M. Plasmonic nanopores for single-molecule detection and manipulation: Toward sequencing applications. Nano Lett. 19, 7553–7562 (2019).
Economou, E. Surface plasmons in thin films. Phys. Rev. 182, 539 (1969).
Villa, F., Lopez-Rios, T. & Regalado, L. Electromagnetic modes in metal-insulator-metal structures. Phys. Rev. B 63, 165103 (2001).
Refki, S., Hayashi, S., Rahmouni, A., Nesterenko, D. V. & Sekkat, Z. Anticrossing behavior of surface plasmon polariton dispersions in metal-insulator-metal structures. Plasmonics 11, 433–440 (2016).
Matsunaga, K., Watanabe, T., Neo, Y., Matsumoto, T. & Tomita, M. Attenuated total reflection response to wavelength tuning of plasmon-induced transparency in a metal-insulator-metal structure. Opt. Lett. 41, 5274–5277 (2016).
Neo, Y., Matsumoto, T., Watanabe, T., Tomita, M. & Mimura, H. Transformation from plasmon-induced transparence to-induced absorption through the control of coupling strength in metal-insulator-metal structure. Opt. Express 24, 26201–26208 (2016).
Luk’Yanchuk, B. et al. The fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 9, 707–715 (2010).
Harris, S. E., Field, J. & Imamoğlu, A. Nonlinear optical processes using electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1107 (1990).
Xu, Q. et al. Experimental realization of an on-chip all-optical analogue to electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 123901 (2006).
Zhang, S., Genov, D. A., Wang, Y., Liu, M. & Zhang, X. Plasmon-induced transparency in metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 047401 (2008).
Papasimakis, N., Fedotov, V. A., Zheludev, N. & Prosvirnin, S. Metamaterial analog of electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 253903 (2008).
Liu, N. et al. Plasmonic analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency at the drude damping limit. Nat. Mater. 8, 758–762 (2009).
Hayashi, S., Nesterenko, D. V. & Sekkat, Z. Fano resonance and plasmon-induced transparency in waveguide-coupled surface plasmon resonance sensors. Appl. Phys. Express 8, 022201 (2015).
Sekkat, Z. et al. Plasmonic coupled modes in metal-dielectric multilayer structures: Fano resonance and giant field enhancement. Opt. Express 24, 20080–20088 (2016).
Hayashi, S., Nesterenko, D. V. & Sekkat, Z. Waveguide-coupled surface plasmon resonance sensor structures: Fano lineshape engineering for ultrahigh-resolution sensing. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 48, 325303 (2015).
Safarov, V. et al. Magneto-optical effects enhanced by surface plasmons in metallic multilayer films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3584 (1994).
Yang, K., Clavero, C., Skuza, J., Varela, M. & Lukaszew, R. Surface plasmon resonance and magneto-optical enhancement on Au-Co nanocomposite thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 103924 (2010).
Demidenko, Y., Makarov, D., Schmidt, O. & Lozovski, V. Surface plasmon-induced enhancement of the magneto-optical Kerr effect in magnetoplasmonic heterostructures. JOSA B 28, 2115–2122 (2011).
Ferreiro-Vila, E., García-Martín, J. M., Cebollada, A., Armelles, G. & González, M. Magnetic modulation of surface plasmon modes in magnetoplasmonic metal-insulator-metal cavities. Opt. Express 21, 4917–4930 (2013).
González-Díaz, J. B. et al. Surface-magnetoplasmon nonreciprocity effects in noble-metal/ferromagnetic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 76, 153402 (2007).
Chiu, K. & Quinn, J. Magnetoplasma surface waves in metals. Phys. Rev. B 5, 4707 (1972).
Brion, J., Wallis, R., Hartstein, A. & Burstein, E. Theory of surface magnetoplasmons in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1455 (1972).
De Wames, R. & Hall, W. Magnetic field effect on plasma-wave dispersion in a dielectric layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 172 (1972).
Wallis, R., Brion, J., Burstein, E. & Hartstein, A. Theory of surface polaritons in anisotropic dielectric media with application to surface magnetoplasmons in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 9, 3424 (1974).
Hermann, C. et al. Surface-enhanced magneto-optics in metallic multilayer films. Phys. Rev. B 64, 235422 (2001).
Jain, P. K., Xiao, Y., Walsworth, R. & Cohen, A. E. Surface plasmon resonance enhanced magneto-optics (supremo): Faraday rotation enhancement in gold-coated iron oxide nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 9, 1644–1650 (2009).
Uchida, H., Masuda, Y., Fujikawa, R., Baryshev, A. & Inoue, M. Large enhancement of faraday rotation by localized surface plasmon resonance in au nanoparticles embedded in bi: Yig film. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 843–845 (2009).
Maccaferri, N. et al. Resonant enhancement of magneto-optical activity induced by surface plasmon polariton modes coupling in 2d magnetoplasmonic crystals. ACS Photonics 2, 1769–1779 (2015).
Rizal, C. et al. Magnetophotonics for sensing and magnetometry toward industrial applications. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 230901 (2021).
Maccaferri, N. et al. Ultrasensitive and label-free molecular-level detection enabled by light phase control in magnetoplasmonic nanoantennas. Nat. Commun. 6, 6150 (2015).
Pourjamal, S., Kataja, M., Maccaferri, N., Vavassori, P. & Van Dijken, S. Hybrid ni/sio2/au dimer arrays for high-resolution refractive index sensing. Nanophotonics 7, 905–912 (2018).
Gabbani, A. et al. Magnetoplasmonics beyond metals: Ultrahigh sensing performance in transparent conductive oxide nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 22, 9036–9044 (2022).
Caballero, B., García-Martín, A. & Cuevas, J. C. Hybrid magnetoplasmonic crystals boost the performance of nanohole arrays as plasmonic sensors. ACS Photonics 3, 203–208 (2016).
Regatos, D., Sepúlveda, B., Fariña, D., Carrascosa, L. G. & Lechuga, L. M. Suitable combination of noble/ferromagnetic metal multilayers for enhanced magneto-plasmonic biosensing. Opt. Express 19, 8336–8346 (2011).
Regatos, D. et al. Au/Fe/Au multilayer transducers for magneto-optic surface plasmon resonance sensing. J. Appl. Phys. 108, 054502 (2010).
Belotelov, V. et al. Plasmon-mediated magneto-optical transparency. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–7 (2013).
Armelles, G. et al. Mimicking electromagnetically induced transparency in the magneto-optical activity of magnetoplasmonic nanoresonators. Opt. Express 21, 27356–27370 (2013).
Gong, Y. et al. Current control of light by nonreciprocal magnetoplasmonics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 191104 (2015).
Visnovsky, S. et al. Magneto-optical studies of Pt/Co multilayers and Pt-Co alloy thin films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 3390–3392 (1993).
Manera, M. G., Ferreiro-Vila, E., García-Martín, J. M., García-Martín, A. & Rella, R. Enhanced antibody recognition with a magneto-optic surface plasmon resonance (MO-SPR) sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 58, 114–120 (2014).
Maier, S. A. et al. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications Vol. 1 (Springer, 2007).
Ho, K.-S. et al. Switchable plasmonic routers controlled by external magnetic fields by using magneto-plasmonic waveguides. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–8 (2018).
Lassiter, J. B. et al. Designing and deconstructing the fano lineshape in plasmonic nanoclusters. Nano Lett. 12, 1058–1062 (2012).
Joe, Y. S., Satanin, A. M. & Kim, C. S. Classical analogy of fano resonances. Phys. Scr. 74, 259 (2006).
Lassiter, J. B. et al. Fano resonances in plasmonic nanoclusters: Geometrical and chemical tunability. Nano Lett. 10, 3184–3189 (2010).
Kieling, V. C. Parameters influencing the electrodeposition of Ni-Fe alloys. Surf. Coat. Technol. 96, 135–139 (1997).
Mahmoodi, S., Moradi, M. & Mohseni, S. Magneto-optical response of Cu/NiFe/Cu nanostructure under surface plasmon resonance. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 420, 258–262 (2016).
Bruna, M. & Borini, S. Optical constants of graphene layers in the visible range. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 031901 (2009).
Zhang, N. M. Y. et al. Hybrid graphene/gold plasmonic fiber-optic biosensor. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2, 1600185 (2017).
Homola, J., Yee, S. S. & Gauglitz, G. Surface plasmon resonance sensors: Review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 54(1–2), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(98)00321-9 (1999).
Homola, J. & Piliarik, M. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Sensors (Springer, 2006).
Pellegrini, G. & Mattei, G. High-performance magneto-optic surface plasmon resonance sensor design: An optimization approach. Plasmonics 9, 1457–1462 (2014).
Khaghani, Z., Hosseini Farzad, M. & Asgari, A. Enhanced magneto-optical effect in three layer based magnetoplasmonic structures. Opt. Quant. Electron. 54, 645 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. A. Ghasempour Ardakani for his very great assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.R.: software, data curation. M.H., and A.R.: methodology, investigation, conceptualization, writing—review, and editing. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rezaeian, A., Hosseini Farzad, M. Magneto-optical heterostructures with second resonance of transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect. Sci Rep 14, 3493 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54039-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54039-3
- Springer Nature Limited