Abstract
The Kibble–Zurek mechanism describes defect production due to non-adiabatic passage through a critical point. Here we study its variant from ramping the environment temperature to a critical point. We find that the defect density scales as \(\tau ^{-d\nu }\) or \(\tau ^{-d/z}\) for thermal or quantum critical points, respectively, in terms of the usual critical exponents and \(1/\tau\) the speed of the drive. Both scalings describe reduced defect density compared to conventional Kibble–Zurek mechanism, which stems from the enhanced relaxation due to bath-system interaction. Ramping to the quantum critical point is investigated by studying the Lindblad equation for the transverse field Ising chain in the presence of thermalizing bath, with couplings to environment obeying detailed balance, confirming the predicted scaling. The von-Neumann or the system-bath entanglement entropy follows the same scaling. Our results are generalized to a large class of dissipative systems with power-law energy dependent bath spectral densities as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Non-adiabatic dynamics and quantum quenches have been investigated intensively both experimentally and theoretically1,2. This allows us to address fundamental questions such as thermalization and equilibration, to introduce non-equilibrium quantum fluctuation relations3, to analyze non-linear response. The most archetypical feature is the Kibble–Zurek mechanism4,5,6, which describes universal features of defect production for near adiabatic passages across quantum critical points1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. This theory finds application in diverse fields of physics, ranging from quantum and statistical mechanics through cosmology and cold atomic systems to condensed matter physics.
The basic idea behind Kibble–Zurek theory is that when a system is driven to12,13 or through6,7 the quantum critical point (QCP) by ramping some control parameter, it undergoes an adiabatic–diabatic transition16. In the adiabatic phase, the system has enough time to adjust itself to the new thermodynamic conditions, therefore follows its equilibrium state and the defect production is negligible. On the other hand, upon entering into the diabatic regime, the relaxation time of the system is longer than the timescale associated to the drive. Therefore, the system cannot adjust itself to new equilibrium conditions and defects are inevitably produced. The density of defects depends on the rate of change of the control parameter and certain equilibrium critical exponents.
So far, the Kibble–Zurek mechanism has been exhaustively investigated in closed quantum systems. Recently, there is a surge of interest towards open quantum systems and non-hermitian Hamiltonians17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. These focus on open quantum systems, where dissipation and decoherence through gain and loss and Lindblad dynamics take place. In addition, the Lindblad equation opens the door to study thermalization dynamics by incorporating the principle of detailed balance in the couplings to the environment25,26,27,28,29. Various aspects of the Kibble–Zurek idea has been discussed under dissipative conditions30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42.
We generalize the Kibble–Zurek scaling for quantum systems containing a QCP, namely the transverse field Ising chain, and coupled to a thermalizing bath within the Lindblad equation. In this case, the relaxation is dominated by the system-bath coupling and not by the intrinsic relaxation scale of the QCP. By ramping down the environment temperature to reach the QCP, we find that the defect density obeys a universal scaling, distinct from the conventional Kibble–Zurek scenario, even when the initial temperature is relatively high. This is attributed to the enhanced relaxation due to bath-system interaction. The thermodynamic entropy of the systems also follows the same scaling.
Results
Kibble–Zurek scaling through driving the environment temperature
We review first the conventional Kibble–Zurek scaling before generalizing it to thermal and quantum phase transition in open quantum systems. We study quenching to the critical point, which satisfies the same scaling as ramping through the critical point12,13. The reduced temperature is \(\tilde{T}=T-T_c\) with \(T_c\) the critical temperature, and it is driven to the critical point as a function of time16. Here, we use the conventional approach of statistical physics that the system exchanges energy with a large heat bath at temperature T but their interaction is negligible43, e.g. the canonical ensemble. As a result, the temperature can appear in the Hamiltonian as a parameter through temperature dependent order parameter, external trapping potential etc., and the system is effectively a closed quantum system from the dynamics point of view. When the critical point is approached, the adiabatic–diabatic transition occurs when the rate, at which we drive the system through \(\tilde{T}(t)\), becomes comparable to the inverse of the relaxation time \(\tau _{\textrm{rel}}\). This follows \(\tau _{\textrm{rel}}\sim {\tilde{T}}^{-z\nu }\) with z and \(\nu\) the dynamical critical exponent and the exponent associated to the correlation length44,45,46. The adiabatic–diabatic transition occurs when these two inverse timescales become comparable
We consider linear cooling as \(\tilde{T}(t) = \tilde{T}_0 (1-t/\tau )\) with \(\tilde{T}_0\) the reduced initial temperature \(T_0-T_c\) and \(\tau ^{-1}\) the rate of change. From Eq. (1), the adiabatic–diabatic transition temperature is \(\tilde{T}(t_{tr}) \sim \tau ^{-1/(1 + z\nu )}\) at the transition time \(t_{tr}\). After \(t_{tr}\), the system leaves the adiabatic time evolution and defect production takes place. This temperature governs the scaling properties during the diabatic region. The correlation length scales45 as \(\xi \sim 1/(\tilde{T}(t_{tr}))^\nu\) and in a d-dimensional system, the density of defects follows
This equation applies for negligible system-heat bath interaction. Therefore, we now discuss the fate of the Kibble–Zurek scaling in the presence of non-negligible system-environment coupling, namely in a genuine open quantum system. In this case, the relaxation properties of the system are also influenced and even dominated by the interaction with the environment rather than the internal relaxation processes, namely the coupling to the environment plays a more important role than the intrinsic relaxation time of the system. Within a Lindblad description26,47,48, the environment is characterized by an effective spectral density \(\gamma\), which sets the characteristic damping rate, and possesses a given temperature through the temperature dependent environmental occupation numbers. In thermal equilibrium, the system itself exchanges energy with the bath and takes its temperature.
In the case of driving the environmental temperature, the adiabatic–diabatic transition is determined by effective spectral density of the environment \(\gamma\). A more complicated case of energy dependent spectral density is discussed at the end of this section. Upon changing the environment temperature, the system temperature also changes. The rate of change of the system temperature should be compared to \(\gamma\) and not to the inherent relaxation time of the system, i.e.
We note that the r.h.s. of Eq. (3) contains in principle also the intrinsic relaxation rate of the system, i.e. \(\gamma + {\tilde{T}}^{z\nu }\). However, close to the critical point, the constant environmental coupling \(\gamma\) overwhelms the vanishing intrinsic relaxation rate \(T^{z\nu }\) of the system. In other words, the system relaxes through the faster relaxation channel from the environment (if present) rather than the increasingly long intrinsic relaxation time. For linear cooling, the adiabatic–diabatic transition happens at time \(1/\gamma\) before the critical point is reached. The temperature at this time instant is \(\tilde{T}(t_{tr})=\tilde{T}_0/\gamma \tau\). At the scale \(\tilde{T}(t_{tr})\), the system crosses over from a mainly adiabatic time evolution, when the density matrix closely follows the equilibrium state, to a diabatic time evolution with significant defect production. The correlation length scales with this temperature as \(\xi \sim 1/(\tilde{T}(t_{tr}))^{\nu }\) and the defect density with respect to the thermal expectation value is
for \(\gamma \tau \gg 1\). This applies to thermal phase transitions, driven by \(\tilde{T}\), in the presence of a finite coupling to environment \(\gamma\). In the limit of negligible coupling to environment, one has to consider the intrinsic relaxation time of the system instead, as discussed below Eq. (3), yielding Eq. (1). For a quantum phase transition, which occurs at \(T_c=0\), however, the temperature itself does not drive the quantum phase transition, and the associated thermal correlation length44,49 scales as \(\xi _T\sim T^{-1/z}\). Then, Eq. (4) is modified for a QCP as
using again the temperature \(T(t_{tr})=T_0/\gamma \tau\) at the adiabatic–diabatic transition. For a given \(\tau\), the defect density in Eqs. (4) and (5) is suppressed compared to the conventional Kibble–Zurek case due to the larger exponent. The lower defect density is the consequence of the enhanced relaxation stemming from the bath-system interaction compared to the diverging relaxation time (and vanishing energy scale) for closed quantum systems. In addition, Eqs. (4) and (5) predict not only the \(\tau\), but also the \(T_0\) and \(\gamma\) dependence of the defect density.
We can further generalize these scalings for an environment26,27,48 with energy dependent effective spectral density \(\gamma (E)\sim |E|^s\) with \(s>0\) exponent. The \(s=1\) case corresponds to the common Ohmic bath48. We find that while Eq. (4) remains unchanged, Eq. (5) is modified as
This follows from realizing that at temperature T, the dominant contribution to damping47 from environment comes from the \(E\sim T\) states, therefore the r.h.s of Eq. (3) becomes \(T^s\) through the energy dependent \(\gamma\). Therefore, Eq. (4) remains unchanged since \(T_c^s\) is non-singular for any \(T_c>0\). On the other hand, for the quantum case with \(T_c=0\), we can realize that \(\frac{1}{\tilde{T}} \left| \frac{d\tilde{T}}{dt}\right| \sim T^s\) becomes similar to the conventional Kibble–Zurek relation in Eq. (1) with the \(z\nu \rightarrow s\) and \(\tilde{T}\rightarrow T\) replacements. As a result, Eq. (5) for the number of defects after driving the environment temperature to QCP is altered to Eq. (6) for a power-law spectral density.
We also briefly address the case of non-linear ramps, i.e., when the temperature reaches zero according to \(T(t) = T_0(1-t/\tau )^p\). Following the same scaling arguments presented above, the exponent of Eq. (2) is modified to \(-p\nu d/(1+pz\nu )\) in accordance with Refs.50,51. In Eq. (4), the exponent changes to \(-p\nu d\), while in Eqs. (5) and (6) the exponents are modified to \(-pd/z\) and \(-pd/(z(1+ps))\), respectively. Further generalizations are also possible for a time dependent coupling, i.e. \(\gamma (t)\) as in Ref.52, which is beyond the scope of the present investigation.
Transverse field Ising chain
The paradigmatic example of a quantum phase transition is represented by the one-dimensional transverse field Ising model6,44,53,54,55,56,57 . We demonstrate how the scaling behaviour in Eq. (5) emerges explicitly in a system whose dynamics is governed by the Lindblad equation. The model is described by the Hamiltonian Ising coupled spins in a transverse magnetic field as
where j runs over the sites of the one-dimensional chain and \(J>0\). The number of sites is N and the length of the chain is \(L=Na\) with a the lattice constant. The dimensionless coupling \(g>0\) measures the strength of the transverse field. With a Jordan–Wigner transformation (see “Methods” section), Fourier transformation to momentum space and a Bogoliubov transformation, the Hamiltonian reduces to \(H = \sum _{k>0,m=\pm }E_k \left( d_{km}^+d_{km} -\frac{1}{2}\right)\), where \(E_k = 2J\sqrt{(g-\cos (ka))^2 + \sin ^2(ka)}\) is the energy spectrum of the fermionic excitations and \(d_{km}\) are fermionic operators. In the Hamiltonian, the sum runs over the wavenumbers \(k=(2n+1)\pi /L\) with an integer n. This quantization corresponds to an antiperiodic boundary condition for the fermionic c operators which is in accordance with periodic boundary condition for the spins6.
The density of states as a function of energy is calculated as \(G(E) = \frac{N}{\pi J}\left( 2(g^2 + 1) -(g^2-1)^2\left( \frac{2J}{E} \right) ^2 -\left( \frac{E}{2J}\right) ^2\right) ^{-\frac{1}{2}}\,.\) The domain of G(E) is \(\Delta<E<2J|g+1|\) with \(\Delta = 2J|g-1|\) being the gap.
For \(g=1\), the spectrum is gapless and the system realizes a QCP with critical exponents \(z=\nu =1\)44 and \(d=1\). The QCP separates ferromagnetic (\(g<1\)) and paramagnetic (\(g>1\)) phases. In Ref.6, the quantum quench between the two phases has been studied, i.e., when the system is driven along the g axis through the critical point at \(g=1\) and zero temperature \(T=0\). In the present paper, we consider approaching the QCP from another direction on the phase diagram as illustrated in Fig. 1.
Temperature quench to \(T=0\) within the Lindblad equation
We now couple the transverse field Ising chain to a thermalizing bath via the Lindblad equation18,20,26,58 and consider a quench in which the transverse field is kept constant while the environment temperature is driven linearly from a finite value to zero, see Fig. 1. This yields
where \({\mathcal {D}}\left( L;\rho ;L^+\right) = L\rho L^+ - \{L^+ L,\rho \}/2\). In order to thermalize the system, two jump operators are considered for each k and m, which couple to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian as \(L_{km,\uparrow } = d_{km}^+\) and \(L_{km,\downarrow } = d_{km}\), creating and annihilating a fermionic excitation with quantum numbers m and k, respectively. Thermalization is ensured by requiring the couplings to environment to obey detailed balance corresponding to a bath temperature T as \(\gamma _{k,\downarrow }/\gamma _{k,\uparrow } = e^{\beta E_k}\) with \(\beta =1/T\)27.
Since the goal is to investigate a time-dependent variation of temperature, the temperature dependence of the coupling constants \(\gamma _{k,\downarrow }\) and \(\gamma _{k,\uparrow }\) is essential. The condition of detailed balance determines their ratio only, while an explicit temperature dependence would follow by performing microscopic derivation of bath correlation functions27,59. For a system of the type in Eq. (8), the temperature dependence can be written as29,59
The transition rate \(\gamma\) is already independent from temperature. We emphasize that the Lindblad master equation makes sense only for small system-bath coupling \(\gamma\)26,27,58. We note that the jump operators \(L_{km,\sigma }\) are one of many possible choices to describe detailed balance, more jump processes between states of different wavenumbers could also be included. However, for the sake of simplicity and physical relevance, we focus on the most obvious dissipative processes.
In the followings, we assume that the temperature decreases from an initial temperature \(T_0\) to zero as
for \(0<t<\tau\), and describes linear cooling. Consequently, through \(\beta (t)=1/T(t)\), the coupling constants \(\gamma _{k,\uparrow }\) and \(\gamma _{k,\downarrow }\) depend on time. We note that time-dependent coupling as in Eqs. (9) and (10) preserve the Markovian approximation leading to the Lindbladian dynamics, as was demonstrated in Refs.60,61,62: time-local Lindbladians are Markovian as long as the coupling constants in Eq. (9) are positive throughout the time evolution, and can be connected to and derived from a suitably interacting system-environment model.
Assuming thermal equilibrium at \(t=0\), the probability that the state k m is filled with a fermion is calculated from the Lindblad equation as (see “Methods” section)
which depends on the wavenumber through \(E_k\) only.
Defect density
The total density of defects is obtained as
where G(E) is the density of states. The defect density represents the number of kinks in the FM state6,44 as the expectation value of \(\frac{1}{2}\sum _n(1-\sigma ^z_n\sigma ^z_{n+1})\) or the transverse magnetization in the PM phase, \(\sum _n\sigma ^x_n\). For a perfectly adiabatic quench, the system would reach its ground state and no defects would be present. For finite quench duration, however, a finite number of defects is generated at the end of the quench due to the adiabatic–diabatic transition.
The final density of defects \(n(\tau )\) depends strongly on whether the system is critical or gapped, which influences the behaviour of the density of states at low energies. For the critical gapless system (\(g=1\)), the density of states is constant, \(G(E)\sim \mathrm{const.}\) down to \(E=0\), while in the gapped phase (\(|g-1|\gg 0\)), the density of state diverges as \(G(E)\sim \sqrt{E/(E-\Delta )}\) at the gap edge, \(E\gtrsim \Delta\).
In principle, for the gapped phase, the number of defects after the temperature ramp is expected to be exponentially suppressed on general ground, while at or very close to the QCP, a power-law dependence as in Eq. (5) is expected.
We start with the behaviour in the gapped phases. The final density of defects is obtained analytically in “Methods” section. For near-adiabatic quenches in the gapped case (g far from 1) with both \(1\ll \beta _0 \Delta\) and \(1\ll \gamma \tau\), we find that
In both cases, the number of defects vanishes faster than power-law with \(\gamma \tau\) for long quenches, in accord with the gapped behaviour of the density of states. We note that the limit \(\gamma \tau \gg 1\) implies large values of \(\tau\) but \(\gamma\) is kept small to be within the validity of Lindbladian description.
For the gapless case, \(g=1\), the final density of defects follows a power-law dependence as
We note that the same scaling remains valid even if we stop the time evolution at \(T_f<T_0\) before reaching \(T=0\). This temperature is reached at \(t_f = \tau \left( 1-T_f/T_0\right)\) and using the time-dependence of the defect density n(t) from “Methods” section, we obtain
The first term describes the defect density in thermal state at \(T_f\), while the second term comes from the surplus defect density which scales again as \(\tau ^{-1}\) for long quenches.
We have also studied the full lattice version of the model by performing the energy and the temporal integrals numerically in Eqs. (11) and (12). Equations (13) and (14) agree nicely with the numerically exact results in Fig. 2 including the \(\gamma \tau\) and \(T_0\) dependences. Eq. (14) indeed shows the expected power-law decay in the adiabatic limit as Eq. (5) with \(z =d = 1\). The exponent of the decay differs from the conventional Kibble–Zurek exponent from Eq. (2), which would predict \(n(\tau )\sim \tau ^{-1/2}\) for the transverse field Ising model6. The difference is explained by the bath-system interaction preventing the system from “critical slowing down” and enhancing relaxation throughout the diabatic region. We have also checked numerically (see “Methods” section) that our scaling from Eq. (6) remains valid in the presence of an Ohmic bath, when the coupling to environment becomes energy dependent as \(\gamma \sim |E|^s\) with \(s=1\). In this case, the modified scaling reads as \(\tau ^{-1/2}\), which is perfectly captured by our exact numerics in “Methods” section.
Numerical results for the density of defects, \(n(\tau )\), at the end of the quench for various values of g. (a) Cooling to or very close to the QCP. The solid, dashed and dash-dotted line corresponds to the initial temperature of \(T_0/J=0.1\), 1 and 10, respectively. For each initial temperature, the black dotted line shows the \(\tau ^{-1}\) behavior of Eq. (14). (b) Far from the QCP, the numerical results (solid lines) agree with Eq. (13) (dashed and dotted lines) in limiting cases, the initial temperature is \(T_0/J= 0.1\). For \(g<1\), similar \(\tau\)-dependences are found.
Entropy
While closed quantum systems are typically described by a wavefunction, open quantum systems possess a density matrix. This allows us to calculate the thermodynamic entropy after the temperature ramp, which also quantifies the entanglement between the system of interest and its environment. The entropy change represents a useful measure of the adiabaticity of the quench. For the transverse field Ising model, after a perfectly adiabatic quench, the system is expected to reach the pure ground state with vanishing entropy. For a quench of finite duration, however, some entropy is unavoidably generated. The irreversible entropy production from Kibble–Zurek theory was touched upon in Ref.63. Based on the occupation probabilities \(p_{ks}(t)\) in Eq. (11), the entropy is
The final entropy, \(S(\tau )\), depends on the final occupation probabilities \(p(E_k,\tau )\).
Numerical results for the entropy, \(S(\tau )\), at the end of the quench for various values of g. (a) Cooling to or very close to the QCP. The solid, dashed and dash-dotted line corresponds to the initial temperature of \(T_0/J =0.1\), 1 and 10, respectively. For each initial temperature, the black dotted line shows the \(\tau ^{-1}\) behavior of Eq. (17). (b) Numerical results far from the QCP with the initial temperature \(T_0/J =0.1\), the black dashed lines denote \(2Nn(\tau )\).
In the gapped phase with \(1\ll \beta _0\Delta \ll \gamma \tau\), the final entropy is obtained as \(S(\tau ) \approx 2 N n(\tau )\), displayed in Fig. 3. Similarly to the defect density, the most interesting case involves quench to the gapless, critical system with \(g=1\). For long quenches, we get
The final entropy is plotted in Fig. 3 and is in good agreement with the numerical result for long quenches. For quenches terminating away from the QCP, the entropy gets exponentially suppressed in \(\tau\), similarly to the defect density. We expect that the residual entropy should scale as \(S(T=T_0/\gamma \tau )\) in general, where S(T) is the equilibrium thermal entropy of the system. The temperature \(T_0/\gamma \tau\) gets imprinted into the dynamics of the system at the adiabatic–diabatic transition. For the transverse field Ising chain, the thermal entropy scales64 as \(S(T)\sim T\), which explains the scaling in Eq. (17).
Discussion
We have studied the effect of cooling the environment temperature to a thermal or quantum critical point, and its influence on Kibble–Zurek scaling. We find that the diverging relaxation time, associated to critical points, gets replaced by the inverse coupling to environment, which results in a suppressed, but universal scaling of the defect density. By investigating the dissipative version of the transverse field Ising chain, we verify this prediction and also find that by ramping down the temperature to a gapped ground state, the defect density follows an exponential scaling with the ramp time. The system-bath entanglement entropy follows the same universal scaling and should be accessible experimentally, together with the defect density8.
For a power-law energy dependent bath spectral function with exponent s, the obtained Kibble–Zurek scaling in Eq. (6) is identical to the conventional one in Eq. (2) when \(z\nu =1/s\). Typically these numbers are of order one, therefore one can easily get identical scaling for a temperature quench to the conventional Kibble–Zurek scenario. In particular, as we demonstrated, an Ohmic bath with \(s=1\) for the transverse field Ising chain produces the conventional behaviour for the defect density with exponent 1/2. Experimentally, our results can be tested similarly to Ref.11.
The universal scaling of the defect density in terms of the quench duration for ramping to a quantum critical point applies to a large variety of open quantum systems, ranging from energy independent through subohmic and ohmic to super ohmic bath spectral densities. Not only are these results relevant in highlighting universal features during near-adiabatic cooling processes but can also be beneficial for quantum thermodynamics65 for efficient heat pumps or quantum refrigerators66. Moreover, understanding defect production through temperature variations close to quantum critical points promises to be important for smart design of adiabatic quantum computation protocols67 in open quantum systems.
Methods
Diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in the transverse field Ising model
With the Jordan–Wigner transformation \(\sigma _j^z = \left( c_j + c_j^+ \right) \prod _{m<j}e^{i\pi \hat{n}_m}\) and \(\sigma _j^x = 1 - 2\hat{n}_j\) with \(\hat{n}_j= c_j^+c_j\) as introduced in Ref.6, the Hamiltonian reads
By applying Fourier transform to momentum space, we obtain
where \(A_k = g-\cos (ka)\) and \(B_k = \sin (ka)\).
The Hamiltonian is diagonalized by the Bogoliubov transformation
where \(u_k = \sqrt{1 + (1+B_k/A_k)^{-1/2}}/\sqrt{2}\) and \(v_k=-i\sqrt{1 - (1+B_k/A_k)^{-1/2}}/\sqrt{2}\). After Bogoliubov transformation the Hamiltonian reads
where \(E_k = 2J\sqrt{(g-\cos (ka))^2 + \sin ^2(ka)}\) is the energy spectrum of the fermionic excitations. The energy dependent density of states G(E) is calculated based on the fact that the density of states should be preserves both in momentum and energy space, expressed as \(G(E)\textrm{d}E = 2\frac{L}{2\pi }dk\) where the factor 2 stems from the m-degeneracy. Substituting the spectrum and expressing the wavenumber with the energy leads to
Derivation of the number of defects after temperature quench in the transverse field Ising model
In this section, the derivation of the density of defects is presented. The number of defects is defined as \({\mathcal {N}}_S(t) =\sum _{km} p_k(t)\) where \(p_k(t) = \langle d_{km}^+d_{km} \rangle (t)\) is the occupation probability of the fermionic state corresponding to the quantum numbers k and m.
In order to determine the dynamics of \(p_k(t)\), let us recall the Lindblad equation
where \(L_{km,\uparrow } = d_{km}^+\), \(L_{km,\downarrow } = d_{km}\), \(H=\sum _{k>0,m}E_k (d_{km}^+d_{km}-\frac{1}{2})\) and the coupling constants are given by
and \(\gamma _{k,\downarrow }(t) = \gamma - \gamma _{k,\uparrow }\) with the time-dependent temperature \(T(t) = T_0(1-t/\tau )\). Note that both the unitary and the dissipative terms are diagonal in k and m. Hence, for each km, the dynamics is restricted to a two-dimensional Hilbert space spanned by the states that km is empty or occupied. Using the empty and occupied states as basis, the density matrix can be represented by
with the real-valued functions \(p_k(t) = \langle d_{km}^+ d_{km}\rangle\) and complex-valued functions \(q_k(t)\). Based on the Lindblad equation, the following equations are derived.
If \(\gamma _{k,\uparrow }\) and \(\gamma _{k,\downarrow }\) did not change with time, the steady state of Eq. (26) would be \(q_{k,\infty }=0\) and \(p_{k,\infty } =(1+\gamma _{k,\downarrow }/ \gamma _{k,\uparrow })^{-1} = (1 + e^{\beta E_k})^{-1}\) describing thermal equilibrium.
The time evolution of occupation probability for different quench duration. The solid line is the numerical solution of Eq. (27) while the dashed line corresponds to the system in thermal equilibrium at the instantaneous temperature.
In our model, we assume that the initial condition is the thermal equilibrium state corresponding to the initial temperature \(T_0\), i.e., \(p(0) = (1+e^{\beta _0 E})^{-1}\) with \(\beta _0 = T_0^{-1}\) and \(q(0)=0\). The inhomogeneous differential equations in Eq. (26) are solved by
and \(q_k(t)=0\) for the time interval \(0<t<\tau\). After the temperature quench, i.e., when the cooling has already ended and the temperature is constant zero, we obtain \(p(t>\tau ) = p(\tau ) e^{-\gamma (t-\tau )}\).
The time dependence of p(t) is evaluated numerically and is shown in Fig. 4 for several quench durations. In the figure, dashed lines show the probability for the system in thermal equilibrium at the instantaneous temperature. It can be observed that for long quenches, the time evolution follows closely the equilibrium values but for short quenches, they differ significantly.
The final number of defects is obtained by summing up Eq. (27) leading to
where
is the expectation value of the total number of fermionic excitations in the system where \(\Delta = 2J|g-1|\) is the gap.
We are mostly interested in the low-temperature behavior, i.e., when the temperature is much lower than the bandwidth during the whole quench, \(T_0\ll 2J\). In this situation, only low-energy states are occupied for which the density of states is approximated as
and the function \(F(\beta )\) is computed as
where the upper limit of the integral in Eq. (29) has been set to infinity.
Numerical investigations show that the approximate functions in Eq. (31) are in good agreement with the numerically evaluated Eq. (29) at low temperatures. Substituting Eq. (31) into Eq. (28), we obtain
if g is far from 1. In the formula, \(\Phi (x)\) is the error function defined as \(\Phi (x) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi }}\int _{0}^x e^{-y^2}\textrm{d}y\). If \(g=1\),
At the end of the quench, \(t=\tau\), the density of defects is calculated as
for g being far from 1 and
for \(g=1\).
Defect density in the transverse field Ising model coupled to an ohmic thermal bath
In this section, we assume that the transverse field Ising chain is coupled to an environment with the coupling constants
with \(\gamma (E)=\gamma _0 \frac{E}{2J}\) and \(E_k\) is the positive-valued spectrum of fermionic excitations. In contrast to the previous model, the coupling constants are characterized by an effective spectral density proportional to the energy as typical for Ohmic environment48. The normalization with 2J has been introduced to preserve the dimension of \(\gamma _0\).
The time evolution is formally the same in each wavenumber sector as before in Eq. (27) but the relaxation rate \(\gamma\) should be replaced by \(\gamma _0 E_k\). The final density of defects is determined by the integral
In the \(g=1\) case, the defect density is expected to scale as \(n(\tau )\sim \tau ^{-\frac{d}{z(1+s)}}\) where \(d=1\) is the dimension of the transverse field Ising model, \(z=1\) is the dynamical critical exponent and \(s=1\) for Ohmic environment. Hence, \(n(\tau )\sim 1/\sqrt{\tau }\). The scaling law is confirmed by numerically evaluating the integrals in Eq. (38). As shown in Fig. 5, the combination of \(n(\tau )\sqrt{\tau }\) converges to a constant value indicating that the defect density obeys \(n(\tau )\sim 1/\sqrt{\tau }\) indeed.
Final defect density at \(g=1\) in the case of Ohmic environment obtained by numerically integrating Eq. (38). For large \(\tau\), the combination \(n(\tau )\sqrt{2\beta _0 J\gamma _0\tau }\) tends to a constant value which equals approximately 0.152 implying that \(n(\tau )\sim 1/\sqrt{\tau }\).
We note that the scaling law of \(n(\tau )\sim \tau ^{-\frac{d}{z(1+s)}}\) can also be verified numerically in the case of a non-Ohmic effective spectral density, \(\gamma (E) = \gamma _0 (E/2J)^s\). For instance, for \(s=2\), \(d=z=1\), the scaling law predicts \(n(\tau )\sim \tau ^{-1/3}\) which is numerically confirmed as shown in Fig. 6.
Final defect density at \(g=1\) in the case of non-Ohmic (\(s=2\)) environment obtained numerically. For large \(\tau\), the combination \(n(\tau )\cdot \left( 2\beta _0 J\gamma _0\tau \right) ^{1/3}\) tends to a constant value which equals approximately 0.145 implying that \(n(\tau )\sim \tau ^{-1/3}\).
Data availability
The data supporting the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A. & Vengalattore, M. Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
Dziarmaga, J. Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state. Adv. Phys. 59, 1063 (2010).
Campisi, M., Hänggi, P. & Talkner, P. Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011).
Kibble, T. W. B. Topology of cosmic domains and strings. J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
Zurek, W. H. Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?. Nature 317, 505 (1985).
Dziarmaga, J. Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Exact solution of the quantum Ising model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005).
Polkovnikov, A. Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201 (2005).
Keesling, A. et al. Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator. Nature 568, 207 (2019).
Beugnon, J. & Navon, N. Exploring the Kibble–Zurek mechanism with homogeneous Bose gases. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50(2), 022002 (2017).
Ko, B., Park, J. W. & Shin, Y. Kibble–Zurek universality in a strongly interacting fermi superfluid. Nat. Phys. 15, 1227 (2019).
Xiao, L. et al. Non-Hermitian Kibble–Zurek mechanism with tunable complexity in single-photon interferometry. PRX Quantum 2, 020313 (2021).
Damski, B. & Zurek, W. H. How to fix a broken symmetry: Quantum dynamics of symmetry restoration in a ferromagnetic Bose–Einstein condensate. New J. Phys. 10(4), 045023 (2008).
Białończyk, M. & Damski, B. One-half of the Kibble–Zurek quench followed by free evolution. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2018(7), 073105 (2018).
Qiu, L.-Y. et al. Observation of generalized Kibble–Zurek mechanism across a first-order quantum phase transition in a spinor condensate. Sci. Adv. 6(21), eaba7292 (2020).
Cui, J. et al. Experimentally testing quantum critical dynamics beyond the Kibble–Zurek mechanism. Commun. Phys. 3, 44 (2020).
del Campo, A., Retzker, A. & Plenio, M. B. The inhomogeneous Kibble–Zurek mechanism: Vortex nucleation during Bose–Einstein condensation. New J. Phys. 13(8), 083022 (2011).
El-Ganainy, R. et al. Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry. Nat. Phys. 14(1), 11 (2018).
Rotter, I. & Bird, J. P. A review of progress in the physics of open quantum systems: Theory and experiment. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 114001 (2015).
Bender, C. M. & Boettcher, S. Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having \(\cal{PT}\) symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
Ashida, Y., Gong, Z. & Ueda, M. Non-hermitian physics. Adv. Phys. 69, 3 (2020).
Bergholtz, E. J., Budich, J. C. & Kunst, F. K. Exceptional topology of non-hermitian systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
Nalbach, P., Vishveshwara, S. & Clerk, A. A. Quantum Kibble–Zurek physics in the presence of spatially correlated dissipation. Phys. Rev. B 92, 014306 (2015).
Arceci, L., Barbarino, S., Rossini, D. & Santoro, G. E. Optimal working point in dissipative quantum annealing. Phys. Rev. B 98, 064307 (2018).
Oshiyama, H., Suzuki, S. & Shibata, N. Classical simulation and theory of quantum annealing in a thermal environment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 170502 (2022).
Rajagopal, A. The principle of detailed balance and the Lindblad dissipative quantum dynamics. Phys. Lett. A 246(3), 237 (1998).
Carmichael, H. An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
Breuer, H. & Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
Palmero, M., Xu, X., Guo, C. & Poletti, D. Thermalization with detailed-balanced two-site Lindblad dissipators. Phys. Rev. E 100, 022111 (2019).
Reichental, I., Klempner, A., Kafri, Y. & Podolsky, D. Thermalization in open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. B 97, 134301 (2018).
Rossini, D. & Vicari, E. Dynamic Kibble–Zurek scaling framework for open dissipative many-body systems crossing quantum transitions. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023211 (2020).
Kuo, W.-T., Arovas, D., Vishveshwara, S. & You, Y.-Z. Decoherent quench dynamics across quantum phase transitions. SciPost Phys. 11, 84 (2021).
Yin, S., Mai, P. & Zhong, F. Nonequilibrium quantum criticality in open systems: The dissipation rate as an additional indispensable scaling variable. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094108 (2014).
Keck, M., Montangero, S., Santoro, G. E., Fazio, R. & Rossini, D. Dissipation in adiabatic quantum computers: Lessons from an exactly solvable model. New J. Phys. 19(11), 113029 (2017).
Zamora, A. et al. Kibble–Zurek mechanism in driven dissipative systems crossing a nonequilibrium phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 095301 (2020).
Hedvall, P. & Larson, J. Dynamics of non-equilibrium steady state quantum phase transitions. arXiv:1712.01560.
Patanè, D., Silva, A., Amico, L., Fazio, R. & Santoro, G. E. Adiabatic dynamics in open quantum critical many-body systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 175701 (2008).
Yin, S., Lo, C.-Y. & Chen, P. Scaling in driven dynamics starting in the vicinity of a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. B 94, 064302 (2016).
Anglin, J. R. & Zurek, W. H. Vortices in the wake of rapid Bose–Einstein condensation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1707 (1999).
Witkowska, E., Deuar, P., Gajda, M. & Rzazewski, K. Solitons as the early stage of quasicondensate formation during evaporative cooling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 135301 (2011).
Liu, I.-K., Dziarmaga, J., Gou, S.-C., Dalfovo, F. & Proukakis, N. P. Kibble–Zurek dynamics in a trapped ultracold Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033183 (2020).
Navon, N., Gaunt, A. L., Smith, R. P. & Hadzibabic, Z. Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a homogeneous Bose gas. Science 347(6218), 167 (2015).
King, E. C., Kriel, J. N. & Kastner, M., Universal cooling dynamics towards a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 050401 (2023).
Clerk, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., Marquardt, F. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
Sachdev, S. Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
Cardy, J. Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
Continentino, M. Quantum Scaling in Many-Body Systems: An Approach to Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017).
Brenes, M. et al. Tensor-network method to simulate strongly interacting quantum thermal machines. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031040 (2020).
Weiss, U. Quantum Dissipative Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).
Herbut, I. A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
Barankov, R. & Polkovnikov, A. Optimal nonlinear passage through a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076801 (2008).
Sen, D., Sengupta, K. & Mondal, S. Defect production in nonlinear quench across a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 016806 (2008).
Rossini, D. & Vicari, E. Coherent and dissipative dynamics at quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rep. 936, 1 (2021).
Dutta, A. et al. Quantum Phase Transitions in Transverse Field Spin Models: From Statistical Physics to Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).
Coldea, R. et al. Quantum criticality in an Ising chain: Experimental evidence for emergent \(e_8\) symmetry. Science 327, 177 (2010).
Kinross, A. W. et al. Evolution of quantum fluctuations near the quantum critical point of the transverse field Ising chain system \({\rm conb}_{2}{\rm o}_{6}\). Phys. Rev. X 4, 031008 (2014).
King, A. D. et al. Coherent quantum annealing in a programmable 2,000 qubit Ising chain. Nat. Phys. 18, 1324–1328 (2022).
Bando, Y. et al. Probing the universality of topological defect formation in a quantum annealer: Kibble–Zurek mechanism and beyond. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033369 (2020).
Daley, A. J. Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems. Adv. Phys. 63, 77 (2014).
D’Abbruzzo, A. & Rossini, D. Self-consistent microscopic derivation of Markovian master equations for open quadratic quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 103, 052209 (2021).
Laine, E.-M., Luoma, K. & Piilo, J. Local-in-time master equations with memory effects: Applicability and interpretation. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45(15), 154004 (2012).
Amato, G., Breuer, H.-P. & Vacchini, B. Microscopic modeling of general time-dependent quantum Markov processes. Phys. Rev. A 99, 030102 (2019).
Donvil, B. & Muratore-Ginanneschi, P. Quantum trajectory framework for general time-local master equations. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 4140 (2022).
Deffner, S. Kibble–Zurek scaling of the irreversible entropy production. Phys. Rev. E 96, 052125 (2017).
Liang, T. et al. Heat capacity peak at the quantum critical point of the transverse Ising magnet conb2o6. Nat. Commun. 6, 7611 (2015).
Alicki, R. & Kosloff, R. Introduction to Quantum Thermodynamics: History and Prospects. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–33, ISBN 978-3-319-99046-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99046-0_1.
Gluza, M. et al. Quantum field thermal machines. PRX Quantum 2, 030310 (2021).
Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank B. Gulácsi for useful discussions. This research is supported by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office—NKFIH within the Quantum Technology National Excellence Program (Project No. 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00001), K134437 and K142179, by the BME-Nanotechnology FIKP grant (BME FIKP-NAT), and by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI-UEFISCDI, under Projects Number PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-0277. Á. B. acknowledges the support of the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) under J1-3008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The calculations were performed by Á. B for the transverse field Ising model and by B. D. for the generalized Kibble–Zurek scaling. The results were discussed and the manuscript was written by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bácsi, Á., Dóra, B. Kibble–Zurek scaling due to environment temperature quench in the transverse field Ising model. Sci Rep 13, 4034 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30840-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30840-4
- Springer Nature Limited