Abstract
Age-based bodyweight estimation is commonly used in pediatric settings, but pediatric ICU patients often have preexisting comorbidity and resulting failure to thrive, hence their anthropometric measures may be small-for-age. Accordingly, age-based methods could overestimate bodyweight in such settings, resulting in iatrogenic complications. We performed a retrospective cohort study using pediatric data (aged < 16 years) registered in the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database from April 2015 to March 2020. All the anthropometric data were overlaid on the growth charts. The estimation accuracy of 4 age-based and 2 height-based bodyweight estimations was evaluated by the Bland–Altman plot analysis and the proportion of estimates within 10% of the measured weight (ρ10%). We analyzed 6616 records. The distributions of both bodyweight and height were drifted to the lower values throughout the childhood while the distribution of BMI was similar to the general healthy children. The accuracy in bodyweight estimation with age-based formulae was inferior to that with height-based methods. These data demonstrated that the pediatric patients in the Japanese ICU were proportionally small-for-age, suggesting a special risk of using the conventional age-based estimation but supporting the use of height-based estimation of the bodyweight in the pediatric ICU.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Anthropometric measurements (e.g. bodyweight, height, and head circumferences) are important to determine the dosage of medications and the equipment size for pediatric patients1. These anthropometric indices undergo dramatic changes as children grow during their entire childhood2, and numerous age-based and height-based methods have been proposed to guide appropriate medical interventions. These estimation methods are particularly important in pediatric emergency and intensive care settings, where immediate medical interventions are often required before measuring bodyweight on site, thus various age-based estimation formulas for estimating bodyweight3,4,5,6,7 have been proposed because precise age information is readily available in most cases.
However, it is notable that these age-based estimation formulae were developed based on general populations5,6,7,8,9,10, and pediatric patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) may not follow the anthropometric archetype of the general population because pediatric patients in the ICU often have preexisting comorbidity and resulting failure to thrive11,12,13. A couple of studies have provided anthropometric characteristics of the pediatric population admitted to ICUs. In a prospective British single-center study14, the pediatric population in the ICU had significantly lower weight-for-age compared to the general British children, with the increased proportion of extremely low weight-for-age (18% of the study population were less than − 2.5 SD below the UK reference population mean bodyweight). Ross et al.15, using a large retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from multiple pediatric ICUs in the United States, also showed that pediatric ICU patients had lower weight-for-age compared to the general US population. From the perspective of medical safety, this evidence collectively implicated that the use of age-based estimation of anthropometric values may pose a risk to the pediatric ICU population because of drug dosage errors5. However, the performance comparison of different bodyweight estimation methods has not yet been well explored for the pediatric ICU population.
In this study, we aimed to characterize anthropometric data of the pediatric ICU population in Japan, and evaluate the validity of age-based bodyweight estimation methods for the pediatric ICU population. We hypothesized that the pediatric population in ICU is proportionally small-for-age, hence height-based bodyweight estimation should be used for the pediatric patients in the ICU.
Methods
In this study, we aimed to investigate the distribution of anthropometric indices (bodyweight, height, and body mass index [BMI, identical to the Kaup index]) of Japanese children in ICU on the growth charts. We also aimed to evaluate the performance of established age-based bodyweight calculation tools compared with height-based estimation methods for the pediatric population in Japanese ICU.
Study design and cohort
We performed a retrospective cohort study using the data derived from the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database (JIPAD), a national intensive care unit registry in Japan16. We obtained the 5-year JIPAD data of consecutive patients aged less than 16 years who were admitted to ICU from April 2015 to March 2020. The database provides patient demographics and anthropometric data including bodyweight and height16. This study was reviewed and approved, and the need for informed consent was waived considering the retrospective design and complete anonymization, by Tokyo Medical and Dental University Review Board (M2020-245). All methods in our study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Data plotting on growth charts and standard deviation score calculation
All height and bodyweight data were plotted on the growth charts for Japanese children17 officially provided online by the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology (JSPE; http://jspe.umin.jp/medical/chart_dl.html, Accessed on April 2021). Percentile data of bodyweight and height for each age were calculated by using R software, version 4.1.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
To quantitatively compare the anthropometric indices of pediatric ICU patients with the above JSPE reference-standard, we used standard deviation scores (SDS) for bodyweight, height, and BMI as previously described15,18,19. The SDS for each anthropometric index was calculated using the Excel-based Clinical Tool for Growth Evaluation of Children provided by the JSPE (A general version can be downloaded at http://jspe.umin.jp/medical/chart_dl.html, Accessed on April 2021. A special version for big data analysis was kindly provided by Dr. Yoshiya Ito on behalf of JSPE). Each index required age-in-month to calculate, although the JIPAD database provides age-in-year for subjects aged more than three years. Therefore, for subjects aged three years or older, we calculated these indices using a surrogate age-in-month of “12 × (age) + 6” (e.g. 126 months-old for 10-year-old subjects). Patients were classified into the “extremely low” category for each index when the index was less than − 2.5 SD of the general Japanese population mean14.
Statistical analysis for the distribution of anthropometric data was performed using PRISM 7 (GraphPad) and R software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
Validity assessment of bodyweight estimation tools
We evaluated the validity of a total of six bodyweight estimation methods (Supplementary material 1): four age-based formulae (the original APLS formula20, the new APLS formula21, the Best Guess formula10, and the JAPAN formulae5) and two height-based methods (Broselow Pediatric Emergency Reference Tape 2019 edition [BT22; Vyaire Medical, Inc., Mettawa, IL, USA], and the JAPAN scale23). We chose the above 6 methods because we have recently developed and validated the age-based JAPAN formulae and the height-based JAPAN scale for bodyweight estimation for children using a Japanese large nationwide longitudinal survey5,23, and the other selected formulae have been commonly applied for bodyweight estimation and widely evaluated internationally3 although the covered age range varies according to the formulae (Supplementary material 1). Instead of fitting Broselow “Tape” to the actual patients, height data were cross-referenced to the BT scale and the JAPAN scale upon height-based bodyweight estimation. Notably, the covered height range varies according to the scales (Supplementary material 1).
The Bland–Altman approach and the proportions of the estimates within 10% of the recorded weight (ρ10%) were used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the estimation methods as previously described3,4,24,25. We generated Bland–Altman plots to visually evaluate the agreement between the recorded and estimated bodyweight and calculated the bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA)26. The resulting graph describes the difference of the two values (recorded and estimated bodyweight) plotted (the Y axis) against the mean of the two values (the X axis). The bias represents the difference between the recorded and estimated bodyweight where positive and negative values indicate under- and over-estimation of the bodyweight on average, respectively. The 95% LOA shows the interval in which 95% of the differences between the recorded and estimated bodyweight will fall.
While smaller bias and narrow 95% LOA interval mean a better estimation method, the ρ10% should be as large as possible to be a reliable bodyweight estimation method3,4,24,25. In this study, we also assessed ρ15% and ρ20% to reinforce the findings. In addition, we also evaluated the proportions of estimates within absolute difference (2 kg and 4 kg) of the recorded weight, because the percentage difference would carry different impacts depending on the recorded weight in pediatric patients (e.g. The 10% difference for a 10-kg child is 1 kg while it becomes 5 kg for a 50-kg child).
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Review Board (M2020-245) as well as the steering committee of JIPAD, and anonymized data were provided for analysis by the JIPAD.
Results
Pediatric ICU patients are proportionally small
A total of 7433 admission records from 60 facilities in the JIPAD database were identified in the study period: We excluded 113 records due to missing or improbable data and 704 readmissions within the same hospital stay. We analyzed 6616 admission records with complete data for age, sex, height, and bodyweight. The characteristics of the overall study cohort was presented in Table 1. Overall, the distributions of both bodyweight and height were shifted to the lower side (Fig. 1; the detailed data were shown in the Supplementary material 2 and 3) with approximate mean SDS of − 1.2 and around 20% of patients categorized in the extremely low category (Table 1). The distribution of BMI is almost bell-shaped (Fig. 2) and had higher mean SDS of − 0.52 (95% CI − 0.57 to − 0.48) with less subjects in the extremely low category (10.7%, Table 1). The disease category subgroup analysis revealed that subjects admitted due to “cardiovascular”, “respiratory”, or “gastrointestinal” diseases had lower mean SDSs than the other categories, mainly contributing to expansion of the population in extremely low categories (Table 2).
The accuracy of age-based bodyweight estimation for pediatric ICU patients is low
The performance of the bodyweight estimation methods was visually summarized in Bland–Altman plots (BA-plots; Fig. 3). The BA-plots for the four age-based methods were more widely distributed than those of the height-based formulae. The BA analysis also provides quantitative assessment of the performance where the best estimation formula should give small bias and narrow 95% LOA interval. The bias of age-based formulae was farther to zero with the wider 95% LOA when compared with that of height-based methods, which indicated that age-based formulae had lower accuracy and precision than height-based methods. We also calculated the ρ10% which should be a larger value when the estimation formula performs better, and the overall accuracy of age-based formulae indicated by ρ10% was lower, compared to the two height-based methods (Table 3).
Discussion
Rapid and precise estimation of anthropometric values of children is important in an emergency room and ICU because they are key determinants for drug dosage and size of equipment. Several age-based bodyweight estimation formulae have been proposed because age is the most readily available information hence allowing us to immediately work out the answers even in urgent settings such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, however, the accuracy of these formulae has been questioned4. Height-based estimation formulae such as Broselow Tape are also widely used methods, but their accuracy has also been challenged3. Importantly, these estimation methods were derived from general pediatric populations, therefore whether it is applicable to critically ill children has not been well elucidated. This is particularly important in the pediatric ICU where significant proportions of patients have preexisting comorbidities and resulting failure to thrive. In this study, we demonstrated detailed visual data on anthropometric characteristics of the pediatric ICU population in Japan where both the ICU database and the national pediatric anthropometric references have been long established17.
We have demonstrated that the distributions of bodyweight and height of pediatric ICU population are shifted to the lower side, in line with the previous studies14,15. We have also demonstrated that the proportion of extremely low weight-for-age/height-for-age reaches to around 20% of pediatric patients in ICU while the general prevalence of childhood stunting in developed countries including Japan is around 6%27. On the other hand, we have also described that BMI-for-age had a balanced bell-shaped distribution, which suggests that the body shape is maintained conformable to bodyweight and height for each age in this population. Considering that BMI is a practical assessment index for nutritional status19,28, we speculate that the possible major explanation for the distribution dissociation between weight-/height-for-age and BMI-for-age is the patients’ morbidity rather than the poor nutritional status. Indeed, most disease groups had lower SDS of weight- or height-for-age than that of BMI-for-age, whereas the subjects with “trauma”, which is an acutely acquired condition, had comparable values of these indexes which were closer to zero. In response, most disease group have more subjects in the extremely low categories of weight- or height-for-age than that of BMI-for-age, whereas few subjects with “trauma” belonged to the extremely low categories of these indexes (Table 2).
These “proportionally small-for-age” anthropometric characteristics explain why the height-based bodyweight estimation methods had superior validity over age-based methods for children in ICU. In line with this, Flannigan et al. have described that the age-based new APLS formulae can overestimate the bodyweight of PICU patients in the UK29 by approximately 20%. Moreover, as shown in the Supplementary material 3, the distribution in bodyweight has a wide range in each age, suggesting that mean-for-age bodyweight alone carries a high risk of misestimation of actual bodyweight. This evidence collectively agrees with the recent SCCM guideline for safe medication in ICU where BT was recommended to reduce medication errors30.
Importantly, the “proportionally small-for-age” anthropometric characteristics of pediatric ICU population could influence the safety upon device size selection; i.e. age-based methods could overestimate device size in this population, contributing to undesirable outcomes. For example, overestimating endotracheal tube size does matter for pediatric ICU population because this may result in multiple unrequired attempts at intubation and upper airway injury due to excessive pressures on the mucosa, leading to post-extubation sore throat31,32, or subglottic stenosis at worst33,34. Indeed, there are several studies which demonstrated the inferior ability of the age-based device size estimation over the other approaches35,36,37,38,39. Therefore, from the viewpoint of patient safety, we suggest avoiding the age-based device size estimation and choose alternative way (e.g. height-based estimation) given the pediatric ICU population has such “proportionally small-for-age” anthropometric trends.
This study was inherently subject to some limitations. First, we calculated SDS for subjects aged 3 years or older using surrogate age of “12 × (age) + 6” as explained in the Methods section. We performed the sensitivity analysis, for confirmation, with the SDS calculated using the most conservative surrogate age of “12 × (age)” for these subjects, in which the results produced the same conclusion as the original (data not shown). However, we did not perform the analysis with the SDS calculated using the surrogate age of “12 × (age) + 11” because it was evident that the calculated SDS becomes smaller as the reference age gets older. Second, similar to other databases14,40, the JIPAD database allows guardian-reported or estimated values in case measured values of bodyweight and height are not available. However, we have reported that the accuracy of mother-reported anthropometric values are extremely high in Japan (ρ10%: 94.9%, ρ20%: 98.7%)24. Third, our data confirmed the superiority of height-based methods over age-based methods for bodyweight estimation of pediatric ICU patients, however, the ρ10% of height-based methods in this study were still lower than those reported previously4,41. Accordingly, we recommend avoiding age-based methods, and using height-based methods until obtaining patients’ actual bodyweight information in these population.
Conclusion
We demonstrated that the distributions of bodyweight and height of pediatric population in intensive care units are skewed toward small-for-age using prospectively collected database from 60 ICUs in Japan. Our results suggest a special risk of using age-based methods, and support relative but clear advantages of using height-based methods for patient safety, especially in pediatric ICU settings.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from JIPAD, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under permission for the current study, and are thus not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the steering committee of JIPAD.
Abbreviations
- APLS:
-
Advanced pediatric life support
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- BT:
-
The Broselow tape
- ICU:
-
Intensive care units
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- JIPAD:
-
The Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database
- JSPE:
-
The Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology
- LOA:
-
Limits of agreement
- SD(S):
-
Standard deviation (scores)
- UK:
-
The United Kingdom
- US:
-
The United States
References
Tofovic, S. P. & Kharasch, E. in Smith’s Anesthesia for Infants and Children (eds P.J. Davis & F.P. Cladis) Ch. 7, (Elsevier, 2017).
Isojima, T., Kato, N., Ito, Y., Kanzaki, S. & Murata, M. Growth standard charts for Japanese children with mean and standard deviation (SD) values based on the year 2000 national survey. Clin. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 25, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1297/cpe.25.71 (2016).
Wells, M., Goldstein, L. N., Bentley, A., Basnett, S. & Monteith, I. The accuracy of the Broselow tape as a weight estimation tool and a drug-dosing guide - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 121, 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.026 (2017).
Wells, M. & Goldstein, L. N. How and why paediatric weight estimation systems fail - a body composition study. Cureus 12, e7198. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7198 (2020).
Nosaka, N. et al. New age-based weight estimation formulae for Japanese children. Pediatr. Int. 59, 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.13259 (2017).
Theron, L., Adams, A., Jansen, K. & Robinson, E. Emergency weight estimation in Pacific Island and Maori children who are large-for-age. Emerg. Med. Australas. 17, 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00729.x (2005).
Leffler, S. & Hayes, M. Analysis of parental estimates of children’s weights in the ED. Ann. Emerg. Med. 30, 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70137-9 (1997).
Park, J. et al. A new age-based formula for estimating weight of Korean children. Resuscitation 83, 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.023 (2012).
Luscombe, M. & Owens, B. Weight estimation in resuscitation: Is the current formula still valid?. Arch. Dis. Child. 92, 412–415. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.107284 (2007).
Tinning, K. & Acworth, J. Make your Best Guess: An updated method for paediatric weight estimation in emergencies. Emerg. Med .Australas. 19, 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01026.x (2007).
Mehta, N. M. et al. Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children–an international multicenter cohort study. Crit. Care Med. 40, 2204–2211. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e18a8 (2012).
Grippa, R. B. et al. Nutritional status as a predictor of duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill children. Nutrition 33, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.05.002 (2017).
Campos-Mino, S. & Figueiredo-Delgado, A. Failure to thrive in the PICU: An overlooked real problem. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 20, 776–777. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001986 (2019).
Prince, N. J., Brown, K. L., Mebrahtu, T. F., Parslow, R. C. & Peters, M. J. Weight-for-age distribution and case-mix adjusted outcomes of 14,307 paediatric intensive care admissions. Intensive Care Med 40, 1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3381-x (2014).
Ross, P. A., Newth, C. J., Leung, D., Wetzel, R. C. & Khemani, R. G. Obesity and mortality risk in critically ill children. Pediatrics 137, e20152035. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2035 (2016).
Irie, H. et al. The Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database (JIPAD): A national intensive care unit registry in Japan. J. Crit. Care 55, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.004 (2020).
Isojima, T. et al. Growth references for Japanese individuals with Noonan syndrome. Pediatr. Res. 79, 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.254 (2016).
Must, A. & Anderson, S. E. Body mass index in children and adolescents: considerations for population-based applications. Int. J. Obes. (Lond) 30, 590–594. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803300 (2006).
Bechard, L. J. et al. Nutritional status based on body mass index is associated with morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill children in the PICU. Crit. Care Med. 44, 1530–1537. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001713 (2016).
Mackway-Jones, K., Molyneux, E., Phillips, B., ALSG. Advanced Paediatric Life Support: The Practical Approach 4th edn. (Blackwell, 2005).
Samuels, M. & Wieteska, S. Advanced Paediatric Life Support: The Practical Approach 5th edn. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
Deboer, S., Seaver, M. & Broselow, J. Color coding to reduce errors. Am. J. Nurs. 105, 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-200508000-00031 (2005).
Nosaka, N. et al. Development of a Japanese scale for assessment of paediatric normal weight. Resuscitation 105, e11-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.025 (2016).
Nosaka, N., Fujiwara, T., Knaup, E., Okada, A. & Tsukahara, H. Validity of mothers’ reports of children’s weight in Japan. Acta Med. Okayama 70, 255–259. https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/54500 (2016).
Loo, P. Y., Chong, S. L., Lek, N., Bautista, D. & Ng, K. C. Evaluation of three paediatric weight estimation methods in Singapore. J. Paediatr Child Health 49, E311-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12141 (2013).
Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307–310 (1986).
de Onis, M., Blossner, M. & Borghi, E. Prevalence and trends of stunting among pre-school children, 1990–2020. Public Health Nutr. 15, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980011001315 (2012).
Valla, F. V. et al. Nutritional management of young infants presenting with acute bronchiolitis in Belgium, France and Switzerland: Survey of current practices and documentary search of national guidelines worldwide. Eur. J. Pediatr. 178, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3300-1 (2019).
Flannigan, C., Bourke, T. W., Sproule, A., Stevenson, M. & Terris, M. Are APLS formulae for estimating weight appropriate for use in children admitted to PICU?. Resuscitation 85, 927–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.313 (2014).
Kane-Gill, S. L. et al. Clinical practice guideline: Safe medication use in the ICU. Crit. Care Med. 45, e877–e915. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002533 (2017).
McHardy, F. E. & Chung, F. Postoperative sore throat: Cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia 54, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00780.x (1999).
Stout, D. M., Bishop, M. J., Dwersteg, J. F. & Cullen, B. F. Correlation of endotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 67, 419–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198709000-00025 (1987).
Sherman, J. M. & Nelson, H. Decreased incidence of subglottic stenosis using an “appropriate-sized” endotracheal tube in neonates. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 6, 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950060311 (1989).
Contencin, P. & Narcy, P. Size of endotracheal tube and neonatal acquired subglottic stenosis. Study Group for Neonatology and Pediatric Emergencies in the Parisian Area. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 119, 815–819. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1993.01880200015002 (1993).
Davis, D., Barbee, L. & Ririe, D. Pediatric endotracheal tube selection: A comparison of age-based and height-based criteria. AANA J. 66, 299–303 (1998).
Shibasaki, M. et al. Prediction of pediatric endotracheal tube size by ultrasonography. Anesthesiology 113, 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ef6757 (2010).
Park, S. et al. Prediction of endotracheal tube size using a printed three-dimensional airway model in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: A prospective, single-center, single-group study. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 74, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21114 (2021).
Good, R. J. et al. accuracy of bedside ultrasound femoral vein diameter measurement by PICU providers. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 21, e1148–e1151. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002439 (2020).
Tsukamoto, M., Yamanaka, H. & Yokoyama, T. Predicting the appropriate size of the uncuffed nasotracheal tube for pediatric patients: A retrospective study. Clin. Oral Investig. 23, 493–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2774-6 (2019).
Numa, A., McAweeney, J., Williams, G., Awad, J. & Ravindranathan, H. Extremes of weight centile are associated with increased risk of mortality in pediatric intensive care. Crit. Care 15, R106. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10127 (2011).
Wells, M., Goldstein, L. N. & Bentley, A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of weight estimation systems used in paediatric emergency care in developing countries. Afr. J. Emerg. Med 7, S36–S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.06.001 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank the physicians and staffs of all participating facilities for their effort in gathering data for JIPAD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.N. conceived and designed the study project. N.N., T.A., R.U., Y.M., K.T. and K.W. participated in the study design and statistical analysis. N.N., T.A. and K.W. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Y.M., R.U., K.T. and K.W. critically revised and helped N.N. drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nosaka, N., Anzai, T., Uchimido, R. et al. An anthropometric evidence against the use of age-based estimation of bodyweight in pediatric patients admitted to intensive care units. Sci Rep 13, 3574 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30566-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30566-3
- Springer Nature Limited