Abstract
Respiratory diseases are one of the most common causes of death, and their early detection is crucial for prompt treatment. X-ray dark-field radiography (XDFR) is a promising tool to image objects with unresolved micro-structures such as lungs. Using Talbot-Lau XDFR, we imaged inflated porcine lungs together with Polymethylmethacrylat (PMMA) microspheres (in air) of diameter sizes between 20 and 500 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) over an autocorrelation range of 0.8–5.2 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\). The results indicate that the dark-field extinction coefficient of porcine lungs is similar to that of densely-packed PMMA spheres with diameter of \({200}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\), which is approximately the mean alveolar structure size. We evaluated that, in our case, the autocorrelation length would have to be limited to \({0.57}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) in order to image \({20}\,\hbox {cm}\)-thick lung tissue without critical visibility reduction (signal saturation). We identify the autocorrelation length to be the critical parameter of an interferometer that allows to avoid signal saturation in clinical lung dark-field imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Emphysema and fibrosis are irreversible changes of the lungs micro-structure, which reduce the oxygen intake. They are a common result of chronic lung illnesses like the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), one of the leading causes of death globally1,2. The trigger for COPD in particular can be attributed in large parts to smoking3, air pollution4 and toxic fumes5 in the working environment. Early detection of chronic lung diseases is a necessity to prevent a reduced quality of life and death for millions of people.
A promising candidate for early detection of emphysema and fibrosis is X-ray dark-field chest imaging. While conventional X-ray imaging relies only on the attenuation of X-rays by the tissue, imaging relying on refraction has attracted a lot of attention in the last decade. Imprinting an intensity pattern into an X-ray beam makes it possible to observe how it is deformed or diffused. The deformation due to refraction on structures large enough to be directly resolved by the imaging system leads to phase-contrast imaging6,7,8, whose use is explored in areas like mammography9, intraoperative breast CT10 or virtual histopathology11,12. We focus on the diffusion, referred to as X-ray Dark-Field Radiography (XDFR), which occurs due to multiple deflections on smaller structures, for example when the beam refracts on the many tissue-air interfaces of a lung. While a high density of tissue-air interfaces in a healthy lung strongly diffuses an X-ray beam, as strong dark-field signal, lung tissue with pathologies affected by emphysema or fibrosis13 diffuses less. Multiple studies have already shown that XDFR, in comparison with established methods like computed tomography, can provide better contrast for emphysema with a fraction of the dose13,14. The three-grating Talbot-Lau interferometer is a particular implementation of XDFR that gains traction in the medical imaging realm. It uses two absorption gratings and a phase grating to create an interference pattern from an incoherent X-ray tube, the analysis of which yields the three contrasts: conventional absorption, phase (resolvable refraction) and dark field (DF) (diffusion). The development started by successfully analysing murine lungs15,16,17, studies with porcine lungs18,19 and deceased human bodies20. Recently clinical human studies14,21,22 of chest radiography have been published, as well as a first design for a dark-field CT system23,24, which shows the diagnostic potential25 that dark-field lung imaging provides.
The object-induced diffusion of the Talbot carpet is caused by many interfaces of refractive-index changes26. This has been the topic of multiple studies that quantitatively model and simulate the emergence of the dark-field signal in, most often, distributions of ideal spheres27,28. Those studies identify the autocorrelation length as the crucial parameter determining the sensitivity of an interferometer to the physical feature size. For Talbot-Lau interferometers it is defined as27
where \(\lambda \) is the wavelength of the X-rays, \(L_s\) is the distance of the sample to \(\textrm{G}_2\) and \(p_2\) is the periodicity of the imprinted pattern (the period of the \(\textrm{G}_2\) grating as described in Fig. 1). Analytical theoretical frameworks exist for spheres and allow to fit data of more general shapes29. However, they fall short of interpreting more complicated objects and poly-chromatic setups30 or predicting measurements of complex samples through simulations. More realistic calculations resolve to numerical propagation of the wave front and emphasise the impracticality of interpreting the strength of the dark-field signal as a measure of the real-space autocorrelation function30.
So far only a few experimental points of the dark-field signal’s dependence on the autocorrelation length for lungs were reported31.
In the design of a dark-field imaging system the autocorrelation length plays a crucial role. It defines, together with the energy used26, the amount of diffusion caused by structures of a particular size. A given system is most sensitive to structures of approximately the size equal to its autocorrelation length27. Therefore, adjusting the autocorrelation length of the system allows to optimise the amount of diffusion for a defined structure size. It might seem natural to design a lung XDFR system with the autocorrelation length on the scale of the alveoli, around \({250}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\). However, it is impractical. Firstly, for energies in the \({40}-{70}\,\hbox {keV}\) range, which are necessary to penetrate a human chest, and a system length of a few meters, it would require grating structures with extremely high aspect ratios (below \({0.1}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) pitch at structure heights of around \({200}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\)), impossible to manufacture with the current technology. Secondly, even if such gratings would be available, a prohibitively large dose would be necessary such that that the extremely diffused pattern can still be resolved. The choice of the suitable parameters for a lung X-ray dark-field radiography system thus requires the knowledge of the sensitivity of the dark-field signal to the microstructure of the lung tissue over a range of the autocorrelation lengths.
In this work, we measured the strength of the dark-field signal of porcine lungs over a broad range, \({0.8}-{5.2}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\), of autocorrelation lengths. Porcine lungs are generally a good stand-in for human lungs, and have been used extensively in translational medicine32. Even though they show slightly different anatomical features in terms of number and placement of lung lobes compared to human lungs, the alveolar size in pig and humans is considered comparable, while porcine lungs might show slightly smaller features33,34,35. The lungs were passively inflated in a purposely built vacuum chamber and imaged alongside PMMA microspheres. Our results show that the relative strength of the dark-field signal of the lung tissue is comparable to that of a similar thickness of densely packed \({200}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\)–diameter PMMA spheres in the whole investigated range of the autocorrelation length. Finally, we elaborate on the potential consequences of our results for an informed choice of an autocorrelation length for the design of a human lung XDFR imaging system.
Methods
Inflation by negative pressure
Under in vivo conditions the lungs are inflated by a reduced surrounding pressure forcing air into the lungs. Inspired by36, we designed and built a vacuum chamber shown in Fig. 2. Lungs fitted with a tracheal tube can be hung in the chamber and connected to the surrounding atmosphere via an inlet through its lid. Once the lid was sealed and secured an external pump built up a negative pressure inside the chamber. The pressure was monitored via an absolute pressure sensor (PCR 280, Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH, Asslar, Germany) and controlled via a valve. Two opposite walls of the chamber had large \({0.075}\,\hbox {mm}\)–thick Kapton-foil windows (Dupont, Wilmington, DE, USA). The foil was glued to the aluminium frame with Araldite Standard two-component glue (Huntsman Corp., The Woodlands, TX, USA).
Porcine lungs ethics approval
Fresh porcine lungs were ordered through the veterinary department and obtained directly from the slaughterhouse (Schlachtbetrieb Zürich AG) of Zurich, Switzerland. As the pigs in question were destined to be slaughtered regardless of our study, no further ethics approval was necessary. In Switzerland, lungs fall into the category “K1” and are thus considered “risk materials”. Materials of category “K1” are banned from entering the food-cycle and have to be incinerated. This was ensured by disposing the samples at the cadaver collection facility after experiments, provided by each municipality in Switzerland. Throughout the study 15 porcine lungs have been acquired.
Imaging system
The measurements for the study have been done using a symmetric wide-field-of-view cone-beam grating interferometer schematically depicted in Fig. 1. A Talbot-Lau grating interferometer is a technical solution to perform X-ray interferometry with incoherent sources and pixel sizes much larger than the fringes. It consists of two absorption gratings, \(\text {G}_0\) and \(\text {G}_2\), as well as a phase-shifting grating \(\text {G}_1\). \(\text {G}_0\) acts as an array of narrow sources for partial coherence6, \(\text {G}_2\) with the same periodicity as the incident fringe allows to measure the intensity profile of the Talbot carpet that is created by the phase grating \(\text {G}_1\). A Talbot-Lau interferometer provides access to the absorption, refraction and small-angle-scattering properties of the sample. The corresponding signals are obtained by stepping one of the gratings and observing the intensity of the fringe pattern analysed by \(\text {G}_2\) for each pixel. The signal retrieval is discussed in the section “Image analysis”.
Symmetric geometries place \(\text {G}_1\) in the center between \(\text {G}_0\) and \(\text {G}_2\) and have the advantage that all gratings have the same period37,38. The design energy of the setup, one for which \(\text {G}_1\) shifts the phase of the wavefront by \(\pi \) and for which the distances between the gratings have been chosen, was \({46}\,\hbox {keV}\) and the total length was \({1766}\,\hbox {mm}\). \(\text {G}_0\), \(\text {G}_1\) and \(\text {G}_2\) were placed at \({100}\,\hbox {mm}\), \({918}\,\hbox {mm}\) and \({1736}\,\hbox {mm}\) away from the focal spot of the x-ray source, respectively. The detector was placed \({3}\,\hbox {cm}\) downstream of \(\text {G}_2\). This allows to move samples between \(\text {G}_1\) and \(\text {G}_2\) for a \(L_s\)-range of roughly \({75}-{760}\,\hbox {mm}\) and a range of possible autocorrelation lengths between \({0.5}-{5.2}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) for an effective energy39 of 46 keV.
\(\text {G}_0\) and \(\text {G}_2\) have a period of \({4.2}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) at \({180}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) height. They are gold-plated absorption gratings made by the LIGA process40 on graphite substrates manufactured by Microworks (Karlsruhe, DE). In total three \(80\,\times \,60\hbox {mm}^{2}\) tiles build up \(\text {G}_2\), while a single tile \(\text {G}_0\) is used for phase-stepping. The phase-stepping was done with a P-841.6 piezoelectric-motor (Physik Instrumente (Karlsruhe, DE).
The phase grating \(\text {G}_1\) was fabricated on a \({300}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) thick N-type \(<100>\) double side polished 8-inch silicon wafer. First, the wafer was coated with a layer of MEGAPOSIT SPR220-3.0 positive tone photoresist and patterned using Heidelberg DWL66+ direct laser writer tool. The photoresist pattern was used as an etching mask for the following Si deep reactive ion etching process in a SPTS Rapier etching system. The process was optimized to ensure uniform etching depth and vertical trench sidewalls according to a previous report41. The grating lines were etched into the silicon substrate to a depth of \({59}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) for a \(\pi \)-shift at \({46}\,\hbox {keV}\). Finally, a single tiled \(\text {G}_1\) grating was diced out from the wafer to a size of \(160\,\times \,18\,\hbox {mm}^{2}\).
All gratings were bent around the source so that the lines were parallel to the beam across the whole wide field of view. The X-Ray source used was a Comet MXR-225HP/11 (Comet Group, Flamatt, CH) with a focal spot size of \({0.4}\,\hbox {mm}\) and was operated with 70 kVp at \({10}\,\hbox {mA}\). For detection a prototype detector by DECTRIS (Baden-Daettwil, CH) was used. This detector is a direct-conversion photon-counting device with a \({750}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\)–thick Cadmium-Telluride layer as the active medium and with an area of 256 \(\times \) 3096 isotropic \({75}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) pixels. A single energy threshold of 20 keV was used for all measurements. The spectrum was filtered with a \({3}\,\hbox {mm}\)–thick aluminium filter placed between the source and \(\text {G}_0\). The filtered spectrum has its effective energy at roughly 46 keV, the design energy of \(\text {G}_1\). The sample was placed between \(\text {G}_1\) and \(\text {G}_2\) on a vertical-translation stage. The lung experimental chamber was designed to generously accommodate a fully inflated lung, without the latter touching the chamber’s walls. This resulted in the autocorrelation being limited to a range between \({0.8}-{3.6}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) as it was physically impossible to place the lung very close to the gratings.
A reference phase-stepping scan without the sample in the beam is shown in Fig. 3. The intensity map is shown at the top, the phase map in the middle and the visibility map at the bottom. The average visibility in the field of view is \({6}\,\%\), which is largely due to local defects of the absorption gratings42, which appear as dark areas on the visibility map. The setup is optimized to have a high angular sensitivity and it is aligned to our best capabilities as the rather uniform phase map suggests.
PMMA microspheres
Three sizes of PMMA microspheres samples were obtained from Cospheric LLC (Santa Barbara, California 93160, USA): \({20}-{27}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\), \({180}-{212}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) and \({425}-{500}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\). The diameters were chosen to cover the structure size distribution of alveoli in lungs. PMMA was the material of choice as it features an attenuation coefficient similar to lung-tissue.
The diffusion induced by a sample depends on the number of interfaces. The PMMA spheres have a similar attenuation coefficient as tissue but have air gaps surrounding the spheres while lung tissue surrounds its air spaces. To estimate a comparable sample thickness of a lung’s region of interest and PMMA spheres, the air-PMMA volume filling is inverted to calculate the attenuation (Eq. 3) and R-values (Eq. 5). This allows a comparison between microspheres and lung tissue of roughly the same thickness by selecting a region of interest through the absorption value. The correction was performed by assuming an average mono-sphere packing volume fraction of \({64}\,\%\)43. This leads to an inversion factor of 1.778 = 0.64/(1-0.64).
Measurement protocol
Lungs were hung in the inflation chamber as shown in Fig 2. Alongside the inflated lung we imaged a frozen piece of porcine lung tissue, three Eppendorf tubes filled with microspheres of the size ranges 20–28 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\), 180–212 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) and 425–500 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) and an M4 screw were used.
The chamber was mounted on a vertical stage to measure the sample at different heights. Reference images were taken with the beam going through a \({5}\,\hbox {cm}\)–high window between the chamber and the stage. The vertical axis was mounted to the side of an X95 aluminum profile perpendicular to the optical axis. This allowed to move the lung container over rails to the desired position between \(\text {G}_1\) and \(\text {G}_2\). The pressure sensor and the vacuum pump were attached to the inflation chamber and a constant negative pressure of \({30}\,\hbox {mbar}\) was applied to inflate the lungs.
For every autocorrelation length, the image acquisition always started with a reference measurement followed by a series of sample projections with a \({8}\,\hbox {mm}\) vertical movement in between. At every sample position the exposure time was \({25}\,\hbox {s}\) in total, distributed evenly over a series of five phase-stepping projections with a G0 movement of \({0.84}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) between each image. In order to change the autocorrelation length, the aluminium profile with the sample stage was moved manually along the optical axis in steps of \({2}\,\hbox {cm}\). A separate measurement of frozen porcine lungs and PMMA microspheres outside the inflation chamber allowed a closer positioning to \(\text {G}_1\) and \(\text {G}_2\) and thus a wider range of the autocorrelation lenghts.
Image analysis
The signal-retrieval was performed with linear least-squares fit to every i-th pixel with the model44
where the intensity measured at the \(\text {G}_0\) in the position x is modelled by the intensity of the beam \(I^i\), visibility of the phase-stepping curve \(V^i\) and the phase-shift \(\phi ^i\), \(p_{\textrm{G}_0}\) is the period of the \(\text {G}_0\) grating. The decrease, and the attenuation image \(\Gamma ^i\) was obtained by relating \(I^i\) to the measured reference intensity image \(I^i_0\) (without the object in the beam):
The dark-field signal is defined in a similar manner to the Beer-Lambert law as an exponential decrease of the visibility of the interference pattern per thickness and is also corrected with a flat-field value:
where \(\Sigma \) is the dark-field signal and \(V_0\) the visibility of the flat-field. The R value is the ratio of the dark-field and the absorption, and gives a thickness-normalized value of dark-field signal, or the average dark-field extinction coefficient, in the case of homogeneous objects45:
The images were corrected for beam hardening46 through phase-stepping measurements of flat and solid PMMA plates, spanning the full field of view, with thicknesses between \({1}-{18}\,\hbox {cm}\), revealing the non-linearity of the attenuation signal. We pragmatically modelled the attenuation curve with a quadratic polynomial, and the change in the dark-field signal with a first-degree polynomial. More details on the beam hardening correction are presented in the Supplementary Information.
Next, the images were stitched together vertically. The overlapping part was averaged.
The R-value was displayed after median filter (radius of 6 pixels) to remove large values from the background from dividing values close to zero. The regions of interest were manually located throughout the different autocorrelation lengths to match the same spot as good as possible, while the radius was adjusted to account for the magnification changes.
We introduced a saturation score to account for the saturation of the dark-field signal, which occurs when there is no measurable visibility left after the sample. For each i-th pixel it compares the amplitude in the intensity variation during phase-stepping to the Poisson-distributed quantum noise:
where the max and min are taken over the phase-stepping series. In the last step the relation \(V_0^i\) = (\(I_{max}-I_{min}\))/(\(I_{max}+I_{min}\)) was inserted (this is only valid if the unit of the intensities is counts). A saturation score above one provides the information that the statistical noise in the measurement is higher than the remaining visibility amplitude. We would like to note that an increase of the visibility would always increase the denominator more than the numerator and lead to a reduced saturation score.
Similarly, the image noise defines the visibility that can be obtained even in absence of any signal. In these low signal conditions the noise can be described as47
where n is the number of phase steps, \(I_0\) is the number of photons in absence of a sample, t and \(\mu \) are thickness and the attenuation coefficient of the sample respectively. To arrive there the Beer-Lambert law was used to express I in terms of the incident number of photons and the thickness of the sample.
Results
We imaged a sample consisting of an inflated porcine lung, a frozen piece of porcine lung tissue, three vials with PMMA spheres and a metal screw, as depicted in Fig. 2. The attenuation \(\Gamma \), dark-field \(\Sigma \), \(R = \Sigma / \Gamma \) and the saturation-score images at the lowest autocorrelation length of \({0.8}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) are shown in Fig. 4. Data for all autocorrelation length are aggregated in two scatter plots in Fig. 5 showing the dark-field of different regions of interest as well as an equal-thickness plot with the R-value plotted on the right axis.
To estimate the maximal sample thickness before the dark-signal saturates, the lung’s base measurements (Lung inflated 1) were evaluated. The density of the lower lung during inspiration48 has been shown to be \(\rho _{L} = 0.154\,\)g/cm\(^3\). The mass attenuation coefficient of lung tissue49 (LT) at \({46}\,\hbox {keV}\) has been reported to be \(\mu _{LT} = 0.24\,\)cm\(^2\)/g. Based on the maximal dark-field signal obtainable before saturation
where \(\sigma _{\Sigma }\) is the noise floor from where the visibility can not be detected anymore. With this equation we can define a sensitivity of the measurement as
The maximal dark-field measurable for a certain sensitivity given by Eq. (9) and thickness yields
Inserting \(I_1 = I_0 e^{-\mu _{LT} \rho _L t_{max}} \) and solve for \(t_{max}\) leads to
where \(t_{max}\) is the maximal sample thickness before saturation and \(R(\xi )\) is the R-value of material in question at the autocorrelation length \(\xi \).
Figure 6 shows the corresponding values of \(t_{max}\) for the series ’Lung Inflated 1’ and the 180–212 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) PMMA spheres. \(R(\xi )\) is thickness-independent for homogeneous samples without saturation. For the constant thickness measurements, it corresponds to a scaled graph of the dark-field. The dark-field extinction coefficient increases over the autocorrelation length from zero until the feature size of the diffusing sample is reached and is constant thereafter (shown by Gkoumas et al.28 in Fig. 4 or Strobl26 in Fig. 3b). The R values that were measured over our autocorrelation range yield a straight line as shown in Fig. S3 (Supplementary Information). This allows to interpolate the data with a first-degree polynomial. Due to the gradual approach of R(\(\theta \)) to 0, the extrapolation of the polynomial leads to an upper bound. The exact slope provided in Fig. S3 corresponds to an effective energy of \({46}\,\hbox {keV}\) at \({70}\,\hbox {kVp}\) of a tungsten tube and may vary for different spectra.
The maximal traversed path for X-rays within lung tissue in a posterior-anterior imaging orientation in humans was estimated to be roughly \(t_{max} = {20}\,\hbox {cm}\) based on open accessible human chest CT scans50 and is indicated in Fig. 6 by the black line. Pathologies only lead to a decrease in dark-field signal and as such operating close to \(\xi _{max}\) is reasonable. The measurement sensitivity \(\tau (I_0, V_0)\) allows to connect imaging time/dose and the visibility with the maximal thickness achievable at a certain autocorrelation length.
Discussion
In this study a porcine lung inflation chamber is presented together with data of lung and PMMA microsphere dark-field signal over a wide range of the autocorrelation length. The aim was to provide data to the saturation limits of dark-field lung imaging and system parameters to prevent saturation from occurring.
We established the means to obtain, handle, inflate and image porcine lungs in a negative pressure container. Even though the porcine lungs had cuts and injuries from the slaughtering process the degree of inflation followed the applied pressure difference inside the vacuum chamber. As the lungs were contained in a closed container with almost no air circulation their surface did not dry and they stayed humid also over longer imaging sessions. While the system presented here reliably inflates the lungs and maintains a constant pressure comparable to in vivo conditions, it lacks distinct features present in the human body. Most notably the lack of a volume-confining structure acting against the lung’s expansion similar to the human rib-cage and its musculature as well as the lack of the heart and any circulatory effects.
The study supports findings33,34 that the thickness–corrected dark-field signal R of inflated porcine lungs is found to be similar to the one of PMMA spheres with a size range of 20–500 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) as shown in Fig. 5. For the comparison of lung structures with PMMA spheres a correction of the R-value by a factor 1.778 was necessary based on the inverted matter/air ratio, assuming average dense sphere packing. The exact value of this factor is not significant as it is used for qualitative comparisons only. As such, PMMA spheres are an easily obtainable suitable stand-in for lung samples in terms of the dark-field signal.
Gkoumas et al. reported that the dark-field signal of hard spheres stabilizes once \(\xi = d\), where \(\xi \) is the autocorrelation length and d is the diameter of the spheres28. This stabilizing effect, however, is not observable in our measurements, as the maximal autocorrelation length \(\xi \) reached was \({5.2}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) compared to the smallest imaged structure diameter of \({20}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\). In our case, the asymptotic tendency, best seen in the 20–27 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\) PMMA spheres, towards a constant dark-field signal can clearly be attributed to signal saturation. To not misinterpret results it is important to attribute a level of saturation (as shown in Eq. (6) and Fig. 4) to each pixel of the measurements.
On the basis of our measurements a maximal sample thickness can be estimated for a given autocorrelation length. Assuming a maximal lung thickness in an anterior-posterior (AP) orientation of \({20}\,\hbox {cm}\), a maximal autocorrelation length of \(\xi _{max} = {0.57}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) results, as indicated in Fig. 6. For practical applications operating at the maximal level of detectable visibility loss is not recommended as saturation effects already influence the results before reaching the threshold. The crossing point of the lung data with a \({20}\,\hbox {cm}\) thickness could only be obtained through extrapolation. To provide an interpolated crossing point the closest PMMA spheres to the lung with sizes of \({180}-{212}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) were displayed as well. The small container of these spheres allowed to obtain a measurement at lower autocorrelation length which provides a crossing point with the \({20}\,\hbox {cm}\) lung thickness estimation. The linearity of the R value is only given until saturation effects start to appear. For the shown \({180}-{212}\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) spheres this was not the case and the data points were therefore on a straight line.
Signal saturation in dark-field imaging is an expected effect that occurs once the noise level surpasses the visibility of the phase stepping curve. As dark-field imaging relies on the visibility loss caused by the sample due to small angle scattering, the imaging setup has to be designed such that it is capable of handling the intended sample without saturation. Maximising the visibility is an integral part of optimizing imaging systems and helps to reduce the saturation score as well as increasing the dose efficiency. In our setup the visibility of 6 \(\%\) is much lower than in similar setups22. We attribute it to local defects of the absorption gratings, mainly due to the small bending radius of \(\text {G}_0\)42. The local change in the periodicity reduces the coherence downstream with a magnification of 17 on \(\text {G}_2\) decreasing the visibility. While it is more challenging to reach low noise levels with low visibility, it does not impair the results in any other way. The sensitivity parameter \(\tau \) from Eq. (9) allows to estimate the gain for optimizations in visibility or dose. For clinical applications the dose, or \(I_0\), is to be minimized. Increasing the visibility allows to reduce the dose, but the saturation issue can not reasonably be solved by it. For a clinical lung imaging device, it is therefore necessary to use design parameters that put the autocorrelation length to a suitable value as shown in Fig. 6.
Conclusion
The emergence of first systems for dark-field lung radiography and CT raises the question of the range of parameters applicable for clinical imaging, not unlike the choice of the energy in attenuation imaging. In particular the autocorrelation length is the defining parameter for the sensitivity of DF imaging systems. Furthermore, just as attenuation imaging is susceptible to a loss of signal due to photon starvation, a similar saturation effect is observed in DF imaging due to a complete loss of resolvable visibility. We find out that the autocorrelation length of the system is the crucial parameter for the clinical value it can provide. A lung imaging system should be designed to operate at as high autocorrelation lengths as the visibility and dose allow without encountering saturation effects.
We report on a measurement of the DF signal of inflated porcine lungs in a wide range of autocorrelation lengths with a Talbot-Lau interferometer. We have identified the saturation of the signal to be the most likely design constraint for a human-scale DF imaging systems, because of a combination of a large thickness of the object and low dose. This favours designs with low autocorrelation length, which we quantify in a simplified lung-only case. Further work should also consider the effect of the surrounding tissue on both attenuation and visibility reduction. As the position of the measured object in a Talbot-Lau interferometer changes the autocorrelation length, it allows to tune the sensitivity of the system to the measured object. For quantitative applications, this poses an uncertainty, as the extended object has no uniform autocorrelation length. For clinical applications this can be an option to fine tune the sensitivity on a per-patient basis.
The comparison of the experiment with microspheres also allows the conclusion that the dark-field contrast is induced by structures with a mean size of a few hundred micrometers, which corresponds to the alveolar structure of the lung. Microspheres also provide an attainable and reliable lung substitute for qualitative testing of dark-field lung scanners. Therefore, PMMA microspheres are an attractive option for dark-field phantoms.
Given the potential of DF as a new clinical imaging modality, we hope that the framework we propose will help designing future clinical DF radiography systems.
Data availability
The data and analysis pipeline are publicly available at ETH Research Collection (https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000598251) and Renku (https://renkulab.io/projects/stamplab/autocorrelation-scan-of-porcine-lungs), respectively.
References
Murray, C. J. & Lopez, A. D. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global burden of disease study. Lancet 349, 1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2 (1997).
Soriano, J. B. et al. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Respir. Med. 5, 691–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X (2017).
Song, Q., Chen, P. & Liu, X. M. The role of cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary vascular endothelial cell apoptosis in copd. Respir. Res.https://doi.org/10.1186/S12931-021-01630-1 (2021).
Duan, R.-R., Hao, K. & Yang, T. Air pollution and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 6, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.05.004 (2020).
Torén, K. et al. Occupational exposure to vapor, gas, dust, or fumes and chronic airflow limitation, copd, and emphysema: the swedish cardiopulmonary bioimage study (scapis pilot). Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 12, 3407. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S144933 (2017).
Pfeiffer, F., Weitkamp, T., Bunk, O. & David, C. Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nat. Phys. 2, 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys265 (2006).
Pfeiffer, F. et al. Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer. Nat. Mater. 7, 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2096 (2008).
Pfeiffer, F. et al. X-ray dark-field and phase-contrast imaging using a grating interferometer. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 102006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3115639 (2009).
Arboleda, C. et al. Towards clinical grating-interferometry mammography. Eur. Radiol. 30, 1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06362-x (2020).
Havariyoun, G. et al. A compact system for intraoperative specimen imaging based on edge illumination x-ray phase contrast. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 235005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab4912 (2019).
Vila-Comamala, J. et al. High sensitivity x-ray phase contrast imaging by laboratory grating-based interferometry at high talbot order geometry. Opt. Express 29, 2049–2064. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.414174 (2021).
Kimm, M. A. et al. Grating-based phase-contrast ct (pcct): Histopathological correlation of human liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma specimen. J. Clin. Pathol. 73, 483–487. https://doi.org/10.1136/JCLINPATH-2019-206380 (2020).
Gassert, F. T. et al. X-ray dark-field chest imaging: Qualitative and quantitative results in healthy humans. Radiologyhttps://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210963 (2021).
Willer, K. et al. X-ray dark-field chest imaging for detection and quantification of emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e733–e744. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00146-1 (2021).
Yaroshenko, A. et al. Pulmonary emphysema diagnosis with a preclinical small-animal x-ray dark-field scatter-contrast scanner. Radiology 269, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122413 (2013) (PMID: 23696682).
Schleede, S. et al. Emphysema diagnosis using x-ray dark-field imaging at a laser-driven compact synchrotron light source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 17880–17885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206684109 (2012).
Vignero, J., Marshall, N. W., Vande Velde, G., Bliznakova, K. & Bosmans, H. Translation from murine to human lung imaging using x-ray dark field radiography: A simulation study. PLoS ONE 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206302 (2018).
Gromann, L. B. et al. In-vivo x-ray dark-field chest radiography of a pig. Sci. Rep. 7, 4807. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05101-w (2017).
De Marco, F. et al. Contrast-to-noise ratios and thickness-normalized, ventilation-dependent signal levels in dark-field and conventional in vivo thorax radiographs of two pigs. PLoS ONE 14, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217858 (2019).
Willer, K. et al. X-ray dark-field imaging of the human lung-a feasibility study on a deceased body. PLoS ONE 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204565 (2018).
Gassert, F. T. et al. X-ray dark-field chest imaging: Qualitative and quantitative results in healthy humans. Radiology 301, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210963 (2021).
Frank, M. et al. Dark-field chest x-ray imaging for the assessment of covid-19-pneumonia. Commun. Med. 2, 147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00215-3 (2022).
Viermetz, M. et al. Dark-field computed tomography reaches the human scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2118799119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118799119 (2022).
Viermetz, M. et al. Technical design considerations of a human-scale Talbot-Lau interferometer for dark-field CT. TechRXiv https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.20715286.v1
Graetz Dittmann, J., Balles, A., Hanke, R. & Zabler, S. Review and experimental verification of x-ray dark-field signal interpretations with respect to quantitative isotropic and anisotropic dark-field computed tomography. Phys. Med. Biol.https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abb7c6 (2020).
Strobl, M. General solution for quantitative dark-field contrast imaging with grating interferometers. Sci. Rep. 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07243 (2014).
Lynch, S. K. et al. Interpretation of dark-field contrast and particle-size selectivity in grating interferometers. Appl. Opt. 50, 4310–4319. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.004310 (2011).
Gkoumas, S. et al. A generalized quantitative interpretation of dark-field contrast for highly concentrated microsphere suspensions. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35259 (2016).
Yashiro, W., Terui, Y., Kawabata, K. & Momose, A. On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray talbot interferometry. Opt. Express 18, 16890–16901. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.016890 (2010).
Taphorn, K. et al. Grating-based spectral X-ray dark-field imaging for correlation with structural size measures. Sci. Rep. 10, 13195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70011-3 (2020).
Ludwig, V. et al. Exploration of different x-ray Talbot-Lau setups for dark-field lung imaging examined in a porcine lung. Phys. Med. Biol.https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab051c (2019).
Judge, E. P. et al. Anatomy and bronchoscopy of the porcine lung: A model for translational respiratory medicine. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 51, 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2013-0453TR (2014).
Lum, H. & Mitzner, W. A species comparison of alveolar size and surface forces. J. Appl. Physiol. (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 62, 1865–1871. https://doi.org/10.1152/JAPPL.1987.62.5.1865 (1987).
Koeppen, B. M. & Stanton, B. A. Berne & Levy - Physiology 7 edn (Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2018).
Hansen, J. E. & Ampaya, E. P. Human air space shapes, sizes, areas, and volumes. J. Appl. Physiol. 38, 990–995. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1975.38.6.990 (1975) (PMID: 1141139).
Biederer, J. & Heller, M. Artificial thorax for MR imaging studies in porcine heart-lung preparations. Radiology 226, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2261011275 (2003).
Donath, T. et al. Inverse geometry for grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 054703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3208052 (2009).
Weitkamp, T., David, C., Kottler, C., Bunk, O. & Pfeiffer, F. Tomography with grating interferometers at low-brilliance sources - art no. 63180s. Dev. X-Ray Tomogr. Vhttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.683851 (2006).
Pandeshwar, A., Kagias, M., Wang, Z. & Stampanoni, M. Modeling of beam hardening effects in a dual-phase x-ray grating interferometer for quantitative dark-field imaging. Opt. Express 28, 19187–19204. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.395237 (2020).
Becker, E., Ehrfeld, W., Hagmann, P., Maner, A. & Münchmeyer, D. Fabrication of microstructures with high aspect ratios and great structural heights by synchrotron radiation lithography, galvanoforming, and plastic moulding (liga process). Microelectron. Eng. 4, 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9317(86)90004-3 (1986).
Shi, Z., Jefimovs, K., Romano, L. & Stampanoni, M. Towards the fabrication of high-aspect-ratio silicon gratings by deep reactive ion etching. Micromachineshttps://doi.org/10.3390/mi11090864 (2020).
Richter, M. et al. Investigation on the mechanical interface stability of curved high aspect ratio x-ray gratings made by deep x-ray lithography. J. Micro/Nanopattern. Mater. Metrol. 21, 024901. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.21.2.024901 (2022).
Baranau, V. & Tallarek, U. Random-close packing limits for monodisperse and polydisperse hard spheres. Soft Matter 10, 3826–3841. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52959B (2014).
Wang, Z. et al. Low-dose multiple-information retrieval algorithm for x-ray grating-based imaging. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 635, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.01.079 (2011).
Wang, Z. & Stampanoni, M. Quantitative x-ray radiography using grating interferometry: a feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 6815–6826. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/19/6815 (2013).
Yashiro, W., Vagovič, P. & Momose, A. Effect of beam hardening on a visibility-contrast image obtained by x-ray grating interferometry. Opt. Express 23, 23462–23471. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.023462 (2015).
Chabior, M. et al. Signal-to-noise ratio in x ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 053105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3630051 (2011).
Kohda, E. & Shigematsu, N. Measurement of lung density by computed tomography: Implication for radiotherapy. Keio J. Med. 38, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.38.454 (1989).
X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients | NIST. https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients, Accessed on 23.09.2022.
Shakouri, S. et al. Covid19-ct-dataset: an open-access chest ct image repository of 1000+ patients with confirmed covid-19 diagnosis. BMC Res. Notes, https://doi.org/10.1186/S13104-021-05592-X (2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Gordan Mikuljan of PSI for technical expertise and support. The authors acknowledge the clean room facilities of PSI for gratings fabrication, H. Schift and K. Vogelsang for the DWL66+ tool. We thank DECTRIS for providing the loan prototype. This work has been funded by the SNF R’Equip Grant 206021 189662 (SiDRY), the SNF Sinergia Grant Nr. CRSII5 183568, the PHRT-Pioneer Project Nr. 2021-612 CLARINET as well as the Swisslos Lottery Fund of Kanton Aargau.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the work and approved the manuscript. S.S., D.E., M.R., M.P., Z.W., M.S. planning of project; S.S., D.E., M.R. data acquisition and data analysis; M.R., Z.W., S.S. design of system hardware and software; L.R., Z.S., K.J. manufactured the phase grating; M.R., M.P., Z.W., M.S. supervision of the project; S.S., D.E., M.R. writing of draft; S.S. took the lead in writing the manuscript; M.R., M.P., K.J., L.R., M.S. provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Spindler, S., Etter, D., Rawlik, M. et al. The choice of an autocorrelation length in dark-field lung imaging. Sci Rep 13, 2731 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29762-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29762-y
- Springer Nature Limited