Introduction

Laser ablation (LA) due its capability of complete ablation of any solid material, is the most frequent universal sample introduction technique for solid samples1,2. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) has become a powerful analytical tool for sensitive ultra-trace analysis of solid samples in recent years in different application fields, such as geological samples3,4, metallic and semiconducting materials, environmental and biological samples5,6,7 and so on.

Pt and Pd are known for their valuable properties and rare resources, which have been widely applied in petroleum, automobile, electronics, chemical industry, atomic energy, as well as environmental protection industry8,9,10. Consequently, accurate determination of Pt and Pd in geochemical samples is of great significance for geological science research and precious metal ore prospecting. However, it is difficult to accurate determination of ultra-trace Pt and Pd because of the low abundance and uneven distribution in natural Pt–Pd ore as well as the nugget effect11,12. Therefore, appropriate sample pretreatment techniques of Pt and Pd were needed prior to the determination.

Fire assay is an ancient but still used method, which plays an important role in the separation and enrichment of precious metals. The solid geochemical samples were mixed and reacted with solid fluxing agent at high temperature, then the target precious metals were concentrated by collectors to product high density alloy granule, conversely, the nonprecious metals and rock-forming elements reacted with solid flux to produce low density silicate or borate fluids13,14,15,16. Thereby, the target precious metals were successfully separated from the sample matrix. Based on the difference of collectors, fire assay methods can be divided into nickel sulfide fire assay (NiS-FA)16,17, lead fire assay (Pb-FA)18,19, antimony fire assay (Sb-FA)20, tin fire assay (Sn-FA)21,22 and so on. NiS-FA and Pb-FA are the most commonly used methods to simultaneously concentrate Pt and Pd in geochemical samples. In previous publications, also Pb fire assay buttons23,24,25 and NiS buttons26,27 were determined by LA-ICP-MS for precious metal when using external calibration against matrix-matched standards. However, due to the high and changeable reagent blank mainly from the NiO and PbO collector the accurate determination of ultra-trace Pt and Pd has become very difficult, thus the collector reagents must be purified in advance17,19. The selectivity of Sb-FA was unsatisfactory20 and Sn granules could not be removed by cupellation22. Therefore, other novel fire assay collectors were constantly searching and trying. Pt and Pd could form a series of alloys or metal inter-compounds with non-toxic Bi at high temperatures; thus Bi could quantitatively collect the precious metal elements in solid geological samples28.

In this work, a novel method of Bi-FA preconcentration combined with empirical coefficient method LA-ICP-MS for the determination of ultra-trace Pt and Pd in geochemical samples was established. Non-toxic Bi2O3 was used as the fire assay collector to enrich the precious metal elements into Bi granule, and Ag protection cupellation was employed to form Ag slice for direct laser ablation solid sample injection. Compared with Pb-FA and NiS-FA, the reagent blank of Bi2O3 was relatively low. Thus Bi2O3 could be directly employed to collect precious metal elements without purifying. Moreover, the harm of toxic collector to the analyst and environment was avoided by using the non-toxic Bi2O3. The Chinese Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) of Pt and Pd were treated by the same procedure to obtain completely matrix matched Ag slices, and the modified empirical coefficient method was employed to fit the correction curve. Laser ablation analysis of the Ag slice for direct solid sample injection was used to avoid acid digestion that was used in the traditional GF-AAS or ICP-MS determination methods, which saved the analysis time, reduced the blank value, decreased the interference of polyatomic molecular ions and the dilution effect, and eliminated acid reagents to protect the environment and the health of the analyst. The established method was successfully applied to determine Pt and Pd in real geochemical samples, and the determined values were in good agreement with the results of traditional Pb-FA GF-AAS method.

Experimental details

Instrumentation

A laser ablation system (Model GeoLas HD, Coherent, USA) coupled to the quadrupole (Q) ICP-MS (Model 7700x, Agilent, USA) was used in all experiments for the determination of Pt and Pd. The operating parameters laser ablation and mass spectrometric measurements are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Millionth electronic balance (ME5, Sartorius, Germany) and micropipettors (100–1000 μL, Brand, Germany) were used for weighing and pipetting.

Table 1 Laser ablation system operating condition.
Table 2 ICP-MS operation conditions.

Standard solutions and reagents

The mixed standard solutions (Pd and Pt 10 μg mL−1) in 10% aqua regia bought from SPEX CertiPrep group (USA). Ag standard solution (25 g L−1) was prepared and used as cupellation protector.

The fire assay collector of Bi2O3 and other solid fluxing agent such as Na2CO3, Na2B4O7·10H2O, Na2O2, CaO, SiO2 and flour were of analytical reagent grade (AR) and purchased from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. HCl and HNO3 were of excellent reagent grade (GR, Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Tianjin). Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm) obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used throughout the whole experiments.

Sample pretreatment and determination

Fire assay recipes, melting process, cupellation and Ag granule pretreatment

According to the mineral composition characteristics of geochemical samples (such as rock, soil, river sediment, chromite, black shale and polymetallic ore), the fire assay recipes were adjusted, as shown in Table 3. In order to have better sample decomposition and enrichment effect, some special samples should be pretreated before fire assay29. For example, sulfide rock sample should be heated in a furnace at 650 °C for 2 h; and chromite sample should be mixed well with CaO and Na2O2 and heated at about 680 °C for 1.5 h.

Table 3 Bi fire assay recipes for geochemical samples.

Raw materials according to Table 3 were mixed well in an ingredient bottle, 70% of the mixture was transferred into a 500 mL fire-clay crucible, then 250 μL of Ag standard solution (25 g L−1) was added. After drying, another 30% of the mixture was added and 20 g of covering agent (Na2CO3, Na2B4O7·10H2O, glass powder, Bi2O3 and flour were mixed well at 50 g: 20 g: 15 g: 10 g: 4 g) was uniformly added. Then the crucible was fused in a furnace heated to 1070 °C gradually and kept for 30 min. The melts in the crucible were poured into a cast iron mold. Once cooled, the Bi granule was separated from the slag.

The Bi granule was cupellated in a magnesia cupel at 940 °C until it produced a dazzling color and flashes, which was the end of cupellation process. At this stage, Bi in the granule was eliminated and the target precious metal elements were trapped in the Ag granule. The Ag granule was ultrasonic cleaned, weighed and annealed at 700 °C for 30 min, then was compressed into a thin slice (~ 0.2 mm). A blank sample was also subjected to this procedure.

Standard samples preparation

According to the fire assay recipes of Chinese Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) in Table 3, 10 g of CRMs (GBW07288, GBW07289, GBW07290, GBW07291, GBW07293, GBW07294, GBW07341 and GBW07342) and solid fluxing agent were mixed well in parallel. Then the next Ag standard solution and covering agent adding procedure and the preparation of external standard CRMs Ag slices steps were the same as “Fire assay recipes, melting process, cupellation and Ag granule pretreatment” section.

LA-ICP-MS determination

The slices of external standard CRMs series and real geochemical sample were determined by random multipoint (10 points) LA-ICP-MS for 195Pt, 105Pd and 109Ag (internal standard). The mass fractions of Pt and Pd in real geochemical samples were calculated by formula (1) as shown in Ref.29:

$$w = \frac{{w_{sam} \times m_{sam} - w_{0} \times m_{0} }}{{m_{s} }} \times 10^{3}$$
(1)

where \({w}_{0}\) is the mass fractions of Pt and Pd in blank Ag slice (μg g−1); \({m}_{0}\) is the mass of blank Ag slice (g); \({w}_{sam}\) is the mass fractions of Pt and Pd in real sample Ag slice (μg g−1); \({m}_{sam}\) is the mass of real sample Ag slice (g); \({m}_{s}\) is the mass of real sample (g).

Result and discussion

Comparison of different collectors

The regent blanks of Bi2O3, NiO and PbO were respectively determined by Bi-FA-ICP-MS, NiS-FA ICP-MS and Pb-FA GF-AAS, and the values were shown in Table 4. It could be seen that the reagent blank of Pt and Pd in Bi2O3 was extremely low compared to commercial PbO and NiO. Therefore, Bi2O3 could be used as collector directly without purification.

Table 4 Total procedure blanks (mean data ± standard deviation, n = 5) for Pt and Pd using commercially available Bi2O3, NiO and PbO (ng g−1).

Cupellation temperature

Metal Bi can be oxidized to Bi2O3 at ~ 300 °C. However, the melting point of Bi2O3 is 820 °C. Therefore, the cupellation temperature must be controlled to above 820 °C so that liquid Bi2O3 could be absorbed by the magnesia cupel. The effect of cupellation temperature was optimized with the data shown in Fig. 1. It can be seen that the cupellation speed was accelerated, and Bi content remaining in the Ag granule was also decreased with increasing of cupellation temperature. When the temperature reached to 950 °C, obvious volatilization of Bi2O3 could be observed. If the temperature was too high, the loss of Pt and Pd as well as muffle furnace would be increased. Therefore, 940 °C was selected as the cupellation temperature.

Figure 1
figure 1

The optimization of cupellation temperature of Bi2O3.

After Bi cupellation, the target Pt and Pd were trapped in the Ag granule. The Ag granule was annealed at 700 °C to further homogenize the alloy of Pt, Pd and Ag, and which was compressed into ~ 0.2 mm slices to facilitate the use of the laser ablation system.

Preparation of Ag slices

The solid samples determined by LA-ICP-MS were required to be as uniform as possible, thus the effect of annealing on the signal stability of 105Pd and 195Pt were evaluated and shown in Fig. 2. It was observed that, the signal fluctuation before annealing was obviously larger than that after annealing. Therefore, the Ag granules were annealed at 700 °C to ensure the uniformity of the target Pt and Pd inside the Ag slices.

Figure 2
figure 2

The effect of annealing on signal stability of 105Pd and 195Pt. Solid line and dotted line were the average and standard deviation after annealing.

Mass spectral interferences

Based on the principle of high abundance and free from isobaric interference, the monitored isotopes of Pt, Pd and Ag were shown in Table S1, 195Pt and 105Pd were selected as measuring isotopes. Though 107Ag and 109Ag are close in abundance, the mass charge ratio difference of 109Ag/105Pd is larger than 107Ag/105Pd, then 109Ag was selected as internal standard isotope. The possible interferences from polyatomic molecular ions on 195Pt, 105Pd and 109 Ag were shown in Table S2. After Bi-FA and cupellation, there were only trace Bi, Au, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh and Ir reserved in Ag granule. Compared to traditional solution injection system, laser ablation solid sample injection could avoid the introduction of large amount of Cl, N, H and O into the ICP. Based on the above means, the possible interferences of polyatomic molecular ions could be effectively decreased.

Modified empirical coefficient method

The empirical coefficient method is based on the certified values and signal strength of a series of CRMs, using linear or nonlinear regression methods to obtain the coefficients for the quantification formula and allow quantitative sample analysis30, which is usually used in X-ray fluorescence analysis of solid samples. However, the traditional empirical coefficient method has a high demand on sample matrix, which requires the composition and structure of the CRMs and the real sample to be tested should be highly similar. Up to now, only a few geochemical Certified Reference Materials included soil, stream sediments, peridotite, chromite and Pt–Pd ores were developed by China. Some special samples, such as polymetallic ore and black shale, the matrix was not identical to the existing CRMs, the accuracy of the method will be affected.

In this work, a fully matrix-matched Ag slices were obtained and modified empirical coefficient method LA-ICP-MS was established for the determination of ultra-trace Pt and Pd in multiple geochemical samples. Bi-FA was employed to enrich the target precious metal elements from the CRMs and real samples (such as soil, river sediment, chromite, olivinite and Pt–Pd ore) into the Bi granule. After Ag protection cupellation, Pt and Pd were enriched in the Ag slices, fully matrix-matched was achieved and the typical Ag slices of CRMs were shown in Fig. 3. Details of the matrix-matched Pt and Pd mixed external standard CRMs series in the Ag slices are shown in Table 5. The concentrations for Pt and Pd in the media of Ag slices were 0.407–2958 μg g−1 and 0.407–2636 μg g−1, respectively. The representative time-resolved LA-ICP-MS signals of blank and certified sample were shown in Fig. S1.

Figure 3
figure 3

The typical Ag slices of CRMs. (A) CRMs before Bi-FA, (B) CRMs after Bi-FA.

Table 5 The mass fractions of Pt and Pd in the Ag slices of CRMs.

Internal standard calibration strategy for LA-ICP-MS

In this work, internal standard calibration method was employed to reduce analysis error and correct biases resulting from fluctuations in laser output power as well as sample ablation amount and transport efficiency, to improve the method precision and accuracy. Due to Ag content in the Ag slices were almost identical between CRMs and real samples, then 109Ag in the Ag slices was selected as internal standard isotope for the determination of 195Pt and 105Pd. According to the basic principle and formula (Formula 2) of internal standard method29, the concentration of the target element in real sample could be calculated.

$$\frac{{w_{t}^{sam} }}{{w_{t}^{std} }} = \frac{{I_{t}^{sam} w_{i}^{sam} /I_{i}^{sam} }}{{I_{t}^{std} w_{i}^{std} /I_{i}^{std} }} = \frac{{I_{t}^{sam} /I_{i}^{sam} }}{{I_{t}^{std} /I_{i}^{std} }}$$
(2)

where \(w_{t}^{sam}\) and \(w_{t}^{std}\) are the concentrations of target element (Pt and Pd) in Ag slices of real and standard samples (μg g−1), respectively; \(w_{i}^{sam}\) and \(w_{i}^{std}\) are concentrations of internal standard element (Ag) in Ag slices of real and standard samples (μg g−1), respectively. In our experiment, as the concentrations of internal standard element in real and standard samples were the same by adding the same amount of Ag standard solution during Ag protection cupellation procedure, then the formula is simplified; \(I_{t}^{sam}\) and \(I_{t}^{std}\) are the signal strength of target element in Ag slices of real and standard samples (cps), respectively; \(I_{i}^{sam}\) and \(I_{i}^{std}\) are the signal strength of internal standard element in Ag slices of real and standard samples (cps), respectively.

The internal standard and non-internal standard method coefficient of variations (CVs) (n = 10) were compared in Table 6. It is observed that the CVs of 195Pt and 105Pd by non-internal standard method were between 5.71 and 6.68%. In comparison, the CVs were reduced to 2.54–4.05% when internal standard method was used.

Table 6 Determined CVs of non-internal standard and internal standard LA-ICP-MS methods.

Analytical performance

The Pt and Pd mixed external standard series were prepared with the concentrations of 0.407–2958 μg g−1 and 0.407–2636 μg g−1 in the media of Ag slices. The standard series of CRMs are shown in Table 5. At the optimum conditions, the intensities of 195Pt, 105Pd and 109Ag were detected by LA-ICP-MS, and the concentrations of target elements were calculated by formula (2).

The analytical performance of the proposed Bi-FA LA-ICP-MS method has been validated using the calibration curve equation, fit coefficient and LODs, shown in Table 7. Excellent curve fitting of Pt and Pd were obtained and shown in Fig. S2 (0.407–2958 μg g−1 and 0.407–2636 μg g−1, respectively), with the correlation coefficients exceeding 0.9996. Based on 3δblank approach as recommended by IUPAC for spectrochemical measurements, the LODs (3 * standard deviation of background/slope of calibration curve, for 10 g sample) of the proposed method for the target Pt and Pd were 0.074 and 0.037 ng g−1, respectively. The LODs for Pt and Pd obtained by this method along with other methods were compared. The results in Table 8 revealed that, due to the high enrichment factor (about 1667 fold, 10 g sample weight pre-concentrated into ~ 6 mg Ag granules) the LODs obtained in this work and our previous Pb-FA LA-ICP-MS methods29 were much lower than those low enrichment factor methods based LA-ICP-MS and NiS/Pb fire assay24,25,26,27.

Table 7 Analytical performance data by the established Bi-FA LA-ICP-MS method for Pt and Pd.
Table 8 Comparison of detection limits using this proposed technique and other conventional methods.

Sample analysis

Under the optimal experimental and instrumental conditions, real geochemical samples were analyzed by the established Bi-FA LA-ICP-MS method and compared to Pb-FA GF-AAS method. The results are shown in Table 9. It can be seen that the determined values are in good agreement with the results of traditional Pb-FA GF-AAS, and the spiked recoveries were between 87.8 and 125.0%.

Table 9 Comparison of analytical data for Pt and Pd in real geochemical samples by the proposed Bi-FA LA-ICP-MS and traditional Pb-FA GF-AAS methods (n = 5, ng g−1).

Conclusions

In this work, the method of Ag protection cupellation Bi-FA combined with LA-ICP-MS for the determination of Pt and Pd was established. Bi2O3 was used as fire assay collector, which has the advantages of lower toxicity and blank values than conventional Pb fire assay. Complete matrix match for the CRMs standards and real geochemical samples were obtained by the modified empirical coefficient method. In order to reduce analysis error and the instability of LA-ICP-MS test parameters, 109Ag was selected as internal standard isotope and internal standard calibration strategy was used. Due to the advantages of obtained by solid sample pretreatment and analysis, the sample throughput was improved and interference of polyatomic molecular ions was decreased. The established method was successfully applied to determination of Pt and Pd in real geochemical samples, and the determined values were in good agreement with the results of traditional Pb-FA GF-AAS analysis.