Abstract
The Yermak Plateau (YP) is located across the Arctic–Atlantic gateway in the northwest of the Svalbard archipelago. In this region, internal waves are believed to cause intense turbulent mixing and hence influence the heat budget in the Arctic Ocean. Based on yearlong observations from three moorings, the characteristics and energetics of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves on the southern slope of the YP are investigated in this study. Diurnal internal waves induce large isothermal displacements exceeding 100 m, which are nearly one order of magnitude greater than those of semidiurnal internal waves. In addition, diurnal internal waves are strong in winter but weak in summer, while the semidiurnal internal waves exhibit complicated temporal variation. For the diurnal internal waves, their available potential energy is greater than the horizontal kinetic energy; whereas the situation is opposite for the semidiurnal ones. This feature is further clarified with twodimensional numerical simulations. Due to the larger tidal excursion, diurnal tidal forcing yields the generation of stronger higher harmonics, i.e., the semidiurnal internal waves. In contrast, higher harmonics are rather weak under the semidiurnal forcing. Moreover, a large proportion of energy for both diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves is dissipated locally. Results of this study can provide useful insight on the dynamics of internal waves in the Arctic Ocean.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As an important intermediate step of the oceanic energy cascade, internal waves make a significant contribution to the turbulent mixing, which is essential for the maintenance of global overturning circulation^{1,2,3,4}. In the midlatitude ocean, tidegenerated internal tides and windgenerated nearinertial internal waves make comparable contributions to the mixing^{5,6,7,8,9,10}. However, in the Arctic Ocean (AO), because of the presence of sea ice, the wind energy importing into the ocean is damped to an extent^{11,12,13,14}, which, on the other hand, highlights the role of tides in driving the mixing^{15}.
Previous observations have demonstrated widespread internal tidal waves within diurnal and semidiurnal bands in the AO^{16,17,18,19,20,21,22}. Because most of the AO is poleward of the critical latitudes (where the local inertial frequency is equal to the tidal frequency) of both semidiurnal and diurnal tides, internal tidal waves cannot freely propagate far away from their generation sites. Instead, they are trapped near their generation sites under the constraint of rotation and dissipated locally^{23,24,25,26}, resulting in enhanced mixing in some slope regions in the AO^{20,21,26,27,28}. The enhanced mixing further affects the heat budget in the AO and influences the global climate^{15,29,30}.
The Yermak Plateau (YP) is the main passage of the Atlantic Water to the AO (Fig. 1a;^{28,31}). The Atlantic Water carried by the West Spitsbergen Current could be an important source of heat and salt for the AO^{32}. As the Atlantic Water flows over the YP, it gets cooled and freshened because of strong airsea fluxes and turbulent mixing^{15,21,28}. Given the presence of strong barotropic tidal flow and steep slopes around the YP^{33}, breaking of tideinduced internal waves is considered to play a dominant role in driving the mixing near the YP^{21}.
Early observations from Padman et al.^{16} have verified the presence of internal tidal waves at the YP, which could induce intense current and isothermal displacement. The following work^{20} indicates that the internal tidal waves in this region are mainly in the diurnal and semidiurnal bands. Also, the measured dissipation rates at the YP are much higher than those in deep basin of AO^{27,28,34}. The simulated barotropictobaroclinic energy conversion in this region reaches 1 GW^{21}, which roughly accounts for 20% of the total conversion in the AO (~ 5 GW^{7,10}). It is also found that the internal tidal waves around the YP behave as trapped waves, and a large proportion of their energy is dissipated locally, which is responsible for the observed enhanced mixing^{21}. These studies substantially deepen our understanding of internal waves in the AO. However, owing to limited observations (site, range and duration), there remain some unknowns about the internal waves in the AO.
In this work, the diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves on the southern slope of the Yermak Plateau are investigated. Field experiment conducted in 2014–2015 provides valuable data on the southern slope of the YP^{35,36}, which give us an opportunity to better understand the internal waves there. During the experiment, yearlong data of currents, temperature and salinity were collected at three moorings with high temporal resolution and large vertical range. Based on these observations, the characteristics and energetics of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves on the southern slope of the YP are analyzed. Moreover, twodimensional numerical simulations are conducted, aiming to further investigate internal wave dynamics in this region.
Method
Moored observations
Observations from three moorings (Y1–Y3^{36}) during September 2014–August 2015 were used to study the internal waves on the southern slope of the YP. Figure 1b shows the locations of the three moorings, and more detailed information about the moorings is listed in Table S1 in supplementary information. At each mooring, the oceanic currents, temperature and salinity were recorded, with raw observations shown in Figs. S1–S3. All the observed data were interpolated at uniform 5 m vertical levels and onehour temporal intervals.
Because the moored observations cannot cover the full water depth at the three moorings, the temperature and salinity data from Multi Observation Global Ocean 3D Temperature Salinity Height Geostrophic Current and MLD products (MULTIOBS) at the three moorings are used as a supplementary. Results indicated that the MULTIOBS temperature, salinity and density show good agreements with observations (Fig. S4). In addition, barotropic tidal currents from Arc5km2018^{37} are also used as a comparison with observations.
Data processing
Gaps exist in the raw observations, which may be caused by the vertical excursion of instruments under the influence of water movements. Here, linear interpolation is adopted to fill in the gaps of current observations in the temporal domain, if the raw current observations covered more than 95% of the total observation period at the corresponding depth^{38}. After this processing, the effective ranges of currents at moorings Y1Y3 are 85–1095 m, 50–705 m and 75–1035 m, respectively.
To isolate diurnal and semidiurnal signals from raw observations, a forthorder Butterworth filter is employed. The cutoff frequencies for diurnal and semidiurnal currents are [0.80, 1.20] cpd and [1.73, 2.13] cpd, respectively, which are determined from power spectra of currents. Note that windgenerated nearinertial waves are included in semidiurnal signals. Removing them from semidiurnal signals could be difficult, since their frequencies are close to the M_{2} and S_{2} tidal frequencies and considerably modulated by background currents^{39}.
The vertical displacements at the moorings are estimated from temperature rather than density, because of the sparse observations of salinity. Here, isotherm displacement is calculated by \(\eta (z,t) = [T(z,t)  \overline{T} (z,t)]/T_{z} (z,t)\), where \(\overline{T} (z,t)\) is the background temperature and \(T_{z} (z,t)\) is the temperature gradient^{40,41}. Both \(\overline{T} (z,t)\) and \(T_{z} (z,t)\) are calculated with lowpassed temperature considering the slowvarying background stratification^{42}.
The filtered diurnal and semidiurnal signals are projected onto vertical modes. As indicated in recent studies, this method is also feasible poleward of the critical latitude^{21,23,25,26}. From the modal prospective, horizontal currents (u and v, corresponding to the zonal and meridional components, respectively) and vertical displacements (η) of internal waves can be expressed as:
where Φ_{n} are the eigenfunctions of the eigenvalue problem for eigenspeed cn:
subject to boundary conditions Φ_{n}(0) = Φ_{n}(− H) = 0,
z is the depth, t is the time, N is the buoyancy frequency, ρ_{0} = 1027 kg/m^{3} is the reference density, H is the local water depth, u_{n}, v_{n} and η_{n} are the amplitudes of modal horizontal currents and vertical displacements with respect to mode n (n = 0 for the barotropic mode and n > 0 baroclinic modes). Following Alford and Zhao^{40}, N_{m} = 2 was considered in this study. Moreover, due to seasonal variation of background stratification, monthly averaged N from MULTIOBS is used in modal decomposition. A validation of modal decomposition is performed in the supplementary information (Text S1).
After modal decomposition, fulldepth horizontal currents and vertical displacements at the moorings are obtained, which can be used to calculate the depthintegrated horizontal kinetic energy (HKE) and available potential energy (APE) for internal waves:
and
Numerical modelling
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm^{43}) is used in this study, which solves fully nonlinear governing equations under the Boussinesq approximation with finitevolume method. The propose of our simulation is to clarify the internal wave dynamics captured by three moorings, rather than to reproduce the observations. A twodimensional configuration of the model is considered, since the crossisobath tidal current is dominant for barotropic tides. Alongisobath velocity is also allowed in the model due to the presence of Coriolis terms in horizontal momentum equations. In addition, the model is run in a hydrostatic mode, because the highly nonlinear internal waves as in Vlasenko et al.^{44} and Rippeth et al.^{25} are beyond the scope of this study. Horizontal resolution is set to 100 m near the slope region, and it is linearly stretched to 6 × 10^{3} m at open boundaries. Vertical resolution is set to 10 m. The total grid number of the simulation is 2000 × 350. Fluxlimited scheme is applied to the advection of temperature and salinity. Bottom boundary is treated as freeslip since boundary layer process cannot be resolved with the present vertical resolution^{45}. Sponge layers are added at two open boundaries to avoid boundary reflection of baroclinic waves. In addition, other parameters in the model are listed in Table 1, which are chosen empirically to suppress gridscale instability^{46,47,48}.
Realistic topography is extracted from ETOPO1 along the transect in Fig. 1b. The maximal and minimal depth are set to 3500 and 500 m, respectively. The maximal slope of the topography is 0.09. Stratification is derived from the MULTIOBS. Tidal forcing is imposed by adding a body force to the horizontal momentum equations, as in previous studies^{25,49,50,51}. Single tidal forcing is considered, whose amplitude U_{0} is obtained from observed barotropic currents at Y1 by harmonic analysis. Each simulation is operated for 6 days, and the simulated results are output every half an hour. Several sensitivity runs with different tidal forcing and stratifications are designed, and detailed information is shown in Table 2.
Results
Observations
Rotary frequency spectra are calculated with horizontal baroclinic currents at the three moorings. Here, the baroclinic current is directly calculated by removing verticalaveraged current from raw observations (see Text S1 in supplementary information). A 40day window with half overlapping is adopted to calculate the spectra, yielding a resolution of 0.025 cpd, which is sufficient to separate the local inertial frequency with semidiurnal tidal frequencies. As shown in Fig. 2, the baroclinic motions at the three moorings are similar, which are dominated by lowfrequency background currents. Spectral densities at diurnal and semidiurnal frequencies are obviously smaller than those at frequencies lower than 0.5 cpd. In addition, no significant peaks are found in the tridiurnal and quarterdiurnal frequency bands at the three moorings, suggesting the lack of highfrequency motions. In terms of rotation, the clockwise (CW) components are dominant for both the diurnal and semidiurnal bands, of which large spectral densities are found near the surface and bottom.
Onemonth segments of baroclinic currents and isotherm displacements corresponding to the diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves are shown in Fig. 3, from which their depthtime structures could be preliminarily illustrated. Results at Y1 are taken as an example. On the whole, the diurnal and semidiurnal baroclinic currents do not show visible difference in the magnitude, whereas the diurnal displacements are much greater than the semidiurnal ones. As shown in Fig. 3c, the diurnal displacement could reach 100 m, while the isotherm displacement corresponding to semidiurnal internal waves is much weaker, especially in the deep water (Fig. 3d). Similar phenomenon also exists at the other moorings (Figs. S5 and S6 in Supplementary information).
Then we examine the wave characteristics by hodographs of horizontal currents at three moorings (Figs. 4 and 5). For both diurnal and semidiurnal currents at the three moorings, the hodographs of raw filtered currents almost share the same pattern as those of the mode0 current amplitude. This result indicates that both the diurnal and semidiurnal currents at the three moorings are dominated by the barotropic component. The semidiurnal barotropic currents are found to be weaker than the diurnal ones. Except the diurnal barotropic currents at mooring Y2, which exhibit a circular feature (Fig. 4j), the diurnal and semidiurnal barotropic currents at these moorings show obvious polarized features: The major axes of diurnal barotropic currents at moorings Y1 and Y3 are nearly aligned in the crossisobath direction (38° east by north, red line in Figs. 4 and 5), while the major axes of semidiurnal barotropic currents at the three moorings are along 60 ^{o} east by north. This is favorable for the generation of internal tidal waves over topography according to the theory^{52,53}. Note that the observed polarization features of diurnal and semidiurnal barotropic currents generally agree with those of the K_{1} and M_{2} constituents extracted from the Arc5km2018 (black ellipses in Figs. 4 and 5), respectively. Compared with the barotropic currents, baroclinic currents show different features. Both the mode1 and mode2 currents are not polarized; instead, they exhibit a circular feature, indicating that the diurnal or semidiurnal internal waves do not have a deterministic propagation direction at the moorings^{54}.
Figure 6 illustrates the HKE and APE of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves at the three moorings, in which the first two baroclinic modes are considered. Note that we do not calculate the APE at mooring Y2 due to the bad modal decomposition result of vertical displacements there. On the whole, total energy (E = HKE + APE) of the diurnal internal waves are apparently greater than that of the semidiurnal ones in the deep region (moorings Y1 and Y3, Fig. 6 and Table 3). It is clearly shown that for diurnal internal waves, the APE is stronger than the HKE, whereas for semidiurnal internal waves, the HKE is dominant. As listed in Table 3, the annual mean HKE/APE ratios for diurnal internal waves at moorings Y1 and Y3 are 0.39 and 0.46. In contrast, the HKE/APE ratios for semidiurnal internal waves at moorings Y1 and Y3 are 6.78 and 2.42, which are generally comparable to those (2.55–6.70) estimated by Fer et al.^{21}.
Seasonal variations of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves are different. For diurnal internal waves, their seasonal cycles could be preliminarily inferred, since the dominant APE is strong in winter but weak in summer (Figs. 6a and c). At mooring Y1 (Y3), the total diurnal energy is 0.90 (1.17) kJ/m^{2} in winter and 0.69 (1.07) kJ/m^{2} in summer. However, the situation is different for semidiurnal ones. Variations of semidiurnal internal waves are different at the three moorings, as the semidiurnal HKE in summer is a little enhanced at moorings Y3 and Y2 but somewhat weakened at Y1 (Figs. 6b,d and f). In addition, both the diurnal and semidiurnal energy do not exhibit apparent springneap cycles. By decomposing them into coherent and incoherent components^{38,55,56,57}, it is found that their intermittence is caused by the incoherent components.
Numerical simulations
For further exploration on the internal wave dynamics on the southern slope of the YP, i.e., the different characteristics and HKE/APE ratios of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves, numerical simulations are conducted. Figure 7 shows baroclinic currents and isotherm displacements of runs K1A and M2A. Here, baroclinic current is calculated by subtracting depthaveraged current from total velocity^{58}. For run K1A, when onshore barotropic tidal flow accelerates, isotherms near the continental slope are lifted (Figs. 7a,b). Elevation of isotherms does not stop although the onshore tidal flow slackens (Figs. 7b,c). Instead, isotherms reach the highest position when onshore tidal flow decreases to zero (Fig. 7c). Thereafter, as the barotropic tidal flow turns, isotherms gradually move downward (Fig. 7d). They get back to the equilibrium positions when the tidal currents again slow down to zero (Fig. 7e). Different from those on the topographies at midlatitude oceans, such oscillations of isotherms do not evolve into internal waves that are radiated offshore from the topography. Correspondingly, baroclinic currents in the offshore region (x < − 100 km) are rather weak.
Unlike the vertical displacements, notable values of baroclinic currents appear mainly around the shelf beak instead of the continental slope. Beamlike structures are observed at the shelf break (x = − 10 km), which are radiated both onshore and offshore (Fig. 7). Strength of the two beams is basically comparable. The offshore beam is nearly undetectable after one reflection at the sea surface. On the shallow shelf, due to the dissipation of highmode waves, beam structure also becomes invisible^{59,60}. Instead, lowmode waves going onshore are dominant (Figs. 7d,e).
When the M_{2} tidal forcing is imposed, the wave field exhibits different features. Upward and downward movements of isotherms exist, but their amplitudes are much smaller than those under the K_{1} tidal forcing (Fig. 7). In contrast, the baroclinic currents in run M2A are obviously greater than those in run K1A, and strong baroclinic currents can be found in the whole slope region. Two generation sites of internal wave beams are detected: one is at the base of continental slope (x = − 85 km) and the other is at the shelf break (x = − 10 km). In addition to the onshorepropagating waves on the shelf which are also found in run K1A, the offshorepropagating waves are clearly seen in this simulation. These results suggest that radiating waves could still be generated under subinertial forcing.
Figure 8 presents the timeseries of simulated baroclinic currents and isotherms at the three moorings. Under the K_{1} forcing, vertical displacements of isotherms show regular diurnal variability (Fig. 8a). Near the bottom, the amplitude of vertical displacements reaches nearly 100 m, and it gradually decreases with the distance from sea bottom. Oscillations of isotherms in shallow water are weaker than those in deep waters (e.g., at Y1 and Y3). These features are generally consistent with those captured by the moorings. As pointed out by Musgrave et al.^{24}, this could be attributed to subinertial, bottomtrapped wave response. However, unlike the displacements, the baroclinic currents at all the moorings do not exhibit pronounced diurnal cycles. At Y1, the period of baroclinic currents cannot be directly determined from the time series. At Y3 and Y2, it is very interesting to find that semidiurnal variability dominates the baroclinic currents. Different from those in run K1A, both the displacements and baroclinic currents in run M2A exhibit remarkable semidiurnal cycles (Fig. 8b). It is easy to find that the amplitude of vertical displacements is much smaller than that in run K1A, which also agrees with the observational results. Nevertheless, the baroclinic currents in run M2A are stronger than those in run K1A, especially in the deep regions (Y1 and Y3), although the forcing amplitude in run M2A is smaller. Moreover, no visible highfrequency signals are detected in the baroclinic currents or vertical displacements in run M2A.
Since signals at frequencies beyond the forcing frequency are found in baroclinic currents in run K1A (Fig. 8a), the power spectral densities (PSDs) of crossisobath baroclinic currents are calculated (Fig. 9). For run K1A (Figs. 9a–c), multifrequency feature is found for the baroclinic currents at these moorings. At mooring Y1, the PSDs at the K_{1} frequency and its higher harmonics are generally comparable (Fig. 9a). At moorings Y3 and Y2, it is noteworthy that the largest PSD appears at the semidiurnal frequency, which is almost one order of magnitude greater than that at the diurnal frequency, i.e., the forcing frequency (Figs. 9b and c). Considering the locations of Y3 and Y2, such semidiurnal baroclinic motion could be attributed to the offshore beam generated at the shelf break (Fig. 7). In addition, peaks are also detected at other higher harmonics (3–5 cpd), of which the PSDs are generally in the same order of magnitude as that at the diurnal frequency. The mixture of signals at the K_{1} frequency and its higher harmonics make it difficult to determine the dominant period directly from the baroclinic currents (Fig. 8a). For run M2A, semidiurnal motions are dominant at all the moorings (Figs. 9d–f), in accordance with the results shown in Fig. 7b. Depthaveraged PSDs of higher harmonics are approximately two orders of magnitude lower than that at the semidiurnal frequency. Moreover, when both the K_{1} and M_{2} forcing are imposed (run K1M2), PSD at the semidiurnal frequency is higher than that with the single M_{2} forcing, suggesting the intensification of semidiurnal internal waves by the diurnal forcing (Fig. 9g).
The different features of high harmonics in runs K1A and M2A could be attributed to different tidal excursion \(\varepsilon = \frac{{U_{0} }}{\omega L}\) for diurnal and semidiurnal tidal forcing, where U_{0} and ω are forcing amplitude and frequency, respectively, and L is the horizontal scale of topography. The total time derivation of tidal forcing F_{T} is expressed as^{61,62},
For small ε, internal waves at the forcing frequencies are generated; but for large ε, the second advection term in Eq. (6) could be dominant, resulting in the generation of waves not only at the fundamental frequency but also at higher harmonics^{24,37}. Because the K_{1} barotropic tidal current has a larger amplitude (Figs. 4 and 5) and lower frequency than the M_{2}, the tidal excursion in run K1A is almost four times larger than that in run M2A. Hence, noticeable higher harmonics are detected in run K1A.
Then we calculate the internal wave energy from the model outputs. Because multifrequency signals are found in the results of run K1A (Figs. 8 and 9), a bandpass filter is adopted to isolate the diurnal and semidiurnal signals. On the whole, the simulated results qualitatively agree with observations reported above: the APE is dominant for diurnal internal waves, whereas the HKE is dominant for semidiurnal internal waves (Fig. 10a and b). Both diurnal and semidiurnal energy decreases from Y1 to Y3, which is also consistent with observations (Table 3). There are two peaks of diurnal energy over the topography, with the higher one locating at the shelf break (Fig. 10a). Similar doublepeak structure is also found for the semidiurnal energy; however, larger values of energy are detected on the slope region rather than around the shelf break.
Energy budget of internal waves is estimated following^{63}:
where the F is the baroclinic energy flux, C is the barotropictobaroclinic energy conversion rate, and D is the dissipation. The energy flux and conversion rate are calculated as
and
where \(\left\langle \cdot \right\rangle\) denotes an average over a tidal period, and pressure perturbation p’ and vertical barotropic velocity w_{bt} at the sea bottom are calculated as in previous studies^{63,64,65}. Energy dissipation is calculated indirectly as the difference between energy conversion and flux divergence^{21,24,66}. Note that the energy budget is integrated within 100 < x < 5 km, where the entire continental slope is covered. As shown in Figs. 10c and d, the semidiurnal tidal forcing yields much larger barotropictobaroclinic energy conversion, although its forcing amplitude is smaller than the diurnal one. According to Kerry et al.^{63}, this could be explained by the phase difference between w_{bt}(− H, t) and p’(− H, t), which almost approaches 90° in run K1A. A small fraction of energy is radiated away from the topography. In run K1A, nearly half of the radiated energy is attributed to semidiurnal waves, i.e., the higher harmonics, while the contribution of diurnal waves is actually limited (Fig. 10c). However, the situation is quite different for run M2A, where the fundamental (semidiurnal) waves play a dominant role in energy radiation (Fig. 10d). This result is consistent with the above spectral analysis results (Fig. 9).
A large proportion of energy is dissipated locally, especially for that in run M2A, which could explain the observed intense turbulent mixing on the YP^{20,21,28}. Following previous studies^{67}, we further examine the local dissipation coefficient q which is defined as the ratio of energy dissipation to conversion. Here, the values of q are 0.53 and 0.87 in runs K1A and M2A, respectively, which are much larger than those in midlatitude oceans where strong tidal forcing exists, such as the Luzon strait (0.4^{67}), the Hawaii Islands (0.19^{68}) and the Mendocino Ridge (0.20–0.70^{24,69}). This result highlights the role of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves in driving mixing in the Arctic ocean.
Discussions
Discrepancies with linear theory
In the linear theory of internal waves, the governing equation in terms of stream function ψ is ^{23,25,70},
Because ω < f_{0} poleward of the critical latitude, the above equation is elliptic. As a result, corresponding solutions represent evanescent waves that are trapped near the topography. Nevetheless, the simulated results suggest the existence of freely propagating internal waves poleward of the critical latitude, of which the frequencies are lower than the local inertial frequency. Therefore, energy could be radiated away from the topography, although the proportion is lower than that in the midlatitude oceans. Moreover, in the presence of strong tidal forcing, the radiating internal waves could further evolve into solitons^{25,26,44}. This implies that the role of nonlinear terms should be taken into consideration.
Linear theory predicts that energy conversion poleward the critical latitude is proportional to \(\sqrt {{{f_{0}^{2} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{f_{0}^{2} } {\omega^{2} }}} \right. \kern\nulldelimiterspace} {\omega^{2} }}  1}\)^{71}. In other words, lowfrequency tidal forcing yields higher energy conversion for a certain latitude. But in our numerical results, it is found that diurnal energy conversion is much lower than the semidiurnal one, even though the diurnal forcing is stronger. This may suggest an overestimation of diurnal energy conversion poleward of the critical latitude^{71}.
Moreover, both the observational and numerical results demonstrate a rather low HKE/APE ratio for diurnal internal waves, unsatisfying the theoretical relation^{23}:
In the midlatitude oceans, the HKE/APE ratio deviating from the theoretical value may be related to standing waves^{40,42,72,73}. However, as shown in the numerical simulations, the continental slope is the only generation site for diurnal internal waves (Fig. 7). There is no superposition of diurnal internal waves with different propagation directions and hence no standing waves. In other words, standing waves are not the cause for the low HKE/APE ratios of diurnal internal waves at the moorings.
The aforementioned discrepancies indicate that the linear theory of internal waves cannot be simply generalized to the Arctic Ocean. Modifications will be made in further theoretical work.
Potential influence of other factors
Annually averaged stratification is used in the simulations. Nevertheless, observations have indicated remarkable seasonal variability of stratification in this region^{31}, which may affect the generated internal waves. To explore the impact of seasonalvarying stratifications, additional simulations with winter and summer stratifications are conducted (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 11, both diurnal and semidiurnal energy are strong in winter but weak in summer. For diurnal internal waves, the result is generally consistent with observations. This suggests that stratification could be a dominant factor controlling seasonal variability of diurnal internal waves. However, the simulated result disagrees with observations for semidiurnal waves, implying that their seasonal variation may be influenced by other factors. Because the semidiurnal frequencies are close to local Coriolis frequency, subtracting windgenerated nearinertial waves from semidiurnal band could be difficult. In other words, observed temporal variation of semidiurnal internal waves could be partially attributed to wind^{35}, but quantitative contributions of wind and tide to semidiurnal internal waves still need further investigation.
In addition, the West Spitsbergen Current flows northward along the southern slope YP^{28,31} where the internal tidal waves are generated. According to the recent numerical work by He and Lamb^{74}, such current considerably affects the generation of internal waves near the critical latitude. The background currents induce nozero relative vorticity ζ, leading to variation of the effective Coriolis frequency, i.e., f_{eff} = f_{0} + ζ/2^{39}. Therefore, they could potentially create blocking regions where radiating internal waves cannot exist, and hence influence tidal energy conversion^{74}. Moreover, the twodimensional simulations conducted in this study with horizontally homogeneous stratification are a large simplification for the real situation. Observational results have demonstrated that the hodographs of baroclinic currents are not polarized, suggesting that internal tidal waves could propagate not only crossshore but also alongshore^{21}. Alongshore propagation of internal waves can only be reproduced in a 3D model. For this circumstance, energy conversion and radiation would be different from those in 2D cases. Hence, threedimensional numerical simulations with realistic tidal and subtidal forcings and stratification will be conducted for further investigation on internal wave dynamics at the YP in the future.
Summary
In this study, based on longterm moored observations, the characteristics and variability of diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves on the southern slope of the YP are investigated. Observational results indicate that diurnal internal waves induce large isothermal displacements over 100 m, which are nearly one order of magnitude greater than those for semidiurnal internal waves. The total energy of diurnal internal waves is greater than that of semidiurnal ones. However, the diurnal internal waves have larger APE than HKE, whereas the semidiurnal internal waves have larger HKE than APE. This result is partly consistent with previous observations^{21} and partly divergent from the linear theory. Moreover, diurnal internal waves show seasonal variations, which are strong in winter but weak in summer. In contrast, the temporal variation of semidiurnal internal waves is somewhat complicated, which is bit different at the three moorings.
Further exploration on internal wave dynamics is carried out with a twodimensional highresolution numerical model. The simulated results qualitatively agree with observations: the APE (HKE) is dominant for diurnal (semidiurnal) internal waves. In addition, due to the large tidal excursion, pronounced higher harmonics (semidiurnal internal waves) are generated under the diurnal forcing, which contribute a large proportion to energy radiation. In contrast, when semidiurnal forcing is imposed, waves at fundamental frequency are dominant. By estimating energy budget over the topography, it is found that most of energy for both diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves is dissipated locally, yielding a large local dissipation coefficient over 0.5.
The internal waves in the AO exhibit different features from those at low latitudes. However, the dynamics lying behind has not been fully understood. We hope that the results shown in this study can deepen the understanding of internal waves in the AO to some extent. Further studies with comprehensive observations and threedimensional highresolution simulations will be carried out, so that we can have a better understanding on internal wave dynamics as well as their influences on heat budget and even climate in the AO.
Data availability
The moored observations are downloaded from http://metadata.nmdc.no/metadataapi/landingpage/ac35993ab477cb6b7d4a0d0070d57b43. The MULTIOBS data are downloaded from https://marine.copernicus.eu/. Bathymetry is obtained from https://ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/. Source code of MITgcm is downloaded from http://mitgcm.org/ (version c66h).
References
Munk, W. & Wunsch, C. Abyssal recipes II: Energetics of tidal and wind mixing. DeepSea Res Pt I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 45, 1977–2010 (1998).
Garrett, C. Internal tides and ocean mixing. Science 301, 1858–1859 (2003).
MacKinnon, J. A. et al. Climate process team on internal wavedriven ocean mixing. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 98, 2429–2454 (2017).
Whalen, C. B. et al. Internal wavedriven mixing: Governing processes and consequences for climate. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 606–621 (2020).
Alford, M. H. Improved global maps and 54year history of windwork on ocean inertial motions. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016614 (2003).
Alford, M. H. Global calculations of local and remote nearinertialwave dissipation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 50, 3157–3164 (2020).
Simmons, H. L., Hallberg, R. W. & Arbic, B. K. Internal wave generation in a global baroclinic tide model. DeepSea Res. Pt II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 51, 3043–3068 (2004).
Niwa, Y. & Hibiya, T. Estimation of baroclinic tide energy available for deep ocean mixing based on threedimensional global numerical simulations. J. Oceanogr. 67, 493–502 (2011).
Niwa, Y. & Hibiya, T. Generation of baroclinic tide energy in a global threedimensional numerical model with different spatial grid resolutions. Ocean Model 80, 59–73 (2014).
Müller, M. On the space and timedependence of barotropictobaroclinic tidal energy conversion. Ocean Model 72, 242–252 (2013).
Rainville, L. & Woodgate, R. A. Observations of internal wave generation in the seasonally icefree Arctic. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041291 (2009).
Martini, K. I., Simmons, H. L., Stoudt, C. A. & Hutchings, J. K. NearInertial Internal Waves and Sea Ice in the Beaufort Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 2212–2234 (2014).
Dosser, H. V., Rainville, L. & Toole, J. M. Nearinertial internal wave field in the canada basin from icetethered profilers. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 413–426 (2014).
Dosser, H. V. & Rainville, L. Dynamics of the changing nearinertial internal wave field in the Arctic Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 46, 395–415 (2016).
Rippeth, T. P. et al. Tidemediated warming of Arctic halocline by Atlantic heat fluxes over rough topography. Nat. Geosci. 8, 191–194 (2015).
Padman, L., Plueddemann, A. J., Muench, R. D. & Pinkel, R. Diurnal tides near the Yermak Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 97, 12639–12652 (1992).
Pnyushkov, A. V. & Polyakov, I. V. Observations of tidally induced currents over the continental slope of the Laptev Sea. Arctic Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 78–94 (2012).
Janout, M. A. & Lenn, Y. Semidiurnal tides on the Laptev Sea shelf with implications for shear and vertical mixing. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 202–219 (2014).
Støylen, E. & Fer, I. Tidally induced internal motion in an Arctic fjord. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 21, 87–100 (2014).
Fer, I., Skogseth, R. & Geyer, F. Internal waves and mixing in the marginal ice zone near the Yermak Plateau. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 1613–1630 (2010).
Fer, I., Müller, M. & Peterson, A. K. Tidal forcing, energetics, and mixing near the Yermak Plateau. Ocean Sci. 11, 287–304 (2015).
Marchenko, A. V., Morozov, E. G., Kozlov, I. E. & Frey, D. I. Highamplitude internal waves southeast of Spitsbergen. Cont. Shelf Res. 227, 104523 (2021).
Musgrave, R. C., Pinkel, R., MacKinnon, J. A., Mazloff, M. R. & Young, W. R. Stratified tidal flow over a tall ridge above and below the turning latitude. J. Fluid Mech. 793, 933–957 (2016).
Musgrave, R. C., MacKinnon, J. A., Pinkel, R., Waterhouse, A. F. & Nash, J. Tidally driven processes leading to nearfield turbulence in a channel at the crest of the Mendocino Escarpment. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 46, 1137–1155 (2016).
Rippeth, T. P. et al. Tidal conversion and mixing poleward of the critical latitude (an Arctic Case Study). Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075310 (2017).
Fer, I. et al. Tidally forced lee waves drive turbulent mixing along the Arctic Ocean margins. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088083 (2020).
Dosser, H. V., Chanona, M., Waterman, S., Shibley, N. C. & Timmermans, M. L. Changes in internal wavedriven mixing across the Arctic Ocean: Finescale estimates from an 18year panArctic Record. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091747 (2021).
Koenig, Z., Kolås, E. H. & Fer, I. Structure and drivers of ocean mixing north of Svalbard in summer and fall 2018. Ocean Sci. 17, 365–381 (2021).
Peterson, A. K., Fer, I., McPhee, M. G. & Randelhoff, A. Turbulent heat and momentum fluxes in the upper ocean under Arctic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 1439–1456 (2017).
Polyakov, I. V. et al. Greater role for Atlantic inflows on seaice loss in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean. Science 356, 285–291 (2017).
Nilsen, F., Ersdal, E. A. & Skogseth, R. Winddriven variability in the Spitsbergen polar current and the Svalbard branch across the Yermak Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016734 (2021).
Kolås, E. & Fer, I. Hydrography, transport and mixing of the West Spitsbergen Current: The Svalbard Branch in summer 2015. Ocean Sci. 14, 1603–1618 (2018).
Padman, L. & Erofeeva, S. A barotropic inverse tidal model for the Arctic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019003 (2004).
Fer, I. Nearinertial mixing in the Central Arctic Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 2031–2049 (2014).
Peterson, A. K. Mixing processes in the changing Arctic Ocean, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bergen, 138 (2017).
Fer, I., & Peterson, A. K. Moored measurements of ocean current, temperature and salinity from Yermak Plateau, Sep. 2014Aug. 2015. Norwegian Marine Data Centre. https://doi.org/10.21335/NMDC1508183213 (2019).
Erofeeva, S., & Egbert, G. Arctic Ocean Inverse Tide Model on a 5 kilometer grid, 2018. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.18739/A21R6N14K (2020).
Cao, A., Guo, Z., Lv, X., Song, J. & Zhang, J. Coherent and incoherent features, seasonal behaviors and spatial variations of internal tides in the northern South China Sea. J. Marine Syst. 172, 75–83 (2017).
Kunze, E. Nearinertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 544–565 (1985).
Alford, M. H. & Zhao, Z. Global patterns of lowmode internalwave propagation. Part I: Energy and energy flux. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 37, 1829–1848 (2007).
MacKinnon, J. A. et al. Parametric subharmonic instability of the internal tide at 29.8°N. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 43, 17–28 (2013).
Zhao, Z., Alford, M. H., Lien, R. C., Gregg, M. C. & Carter, G. S. Internal tides and mixing in a submarine canyon with timevarying stratification. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 2121–2142 (2012).
Marshall, J., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., Perelman, L. & Heisey, C. A finitevolume, incompressible navier stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 5753–5766 (1997).
Vlasenko, V., Stashchuk, N., Hutter, K. & Sabinin, K. Nonlinear internal waves forced by tides near the critical latitude. DeepSea Res Pt I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 50, 317–338 (2003).
Legg, S. Scattering of Lowmode internal waves at finite isolated topography. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 359–383 (2014).
Legg, S. & Adcroft, A. Internal wave breaking at concave and convex continental slopes. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 33, 2224–2246 (2003).
Legg, S. Internal tides generated on a corrugated continental slope. Part I: Crossslope barotropic forcing. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 34, 156–173 (2004).
Legg, S. & Huijts, K. M. H. Preliminary simulations of internal waves and mixing generated by finite amplitude tidal flow over isolated topography. Deep Sea Res Pt II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 53, 140–156 (2006).
Vlasenko, V., Stashchuk, N., Guo, C. & Chen, X. Multimodal structure of baroclinic tides in the South China Sea. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 17, 529–543 (2010).
Vlasenko, V., Guo, C. & Stashchuk, N. On the mechanism of Atype and Btype internal solitary wave generation in the northern South China Sea. DeepSea Res Pt I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 69, 100–112 (2012).
Guo, C., Chen, X., Vlasenko, V. & Stashchuk, N. Numerical investigation of internal solitary waves from the Luzon Strait: Generation process, mechanism and three dimensional effects. Ocean Model 38, 203–216 (2011).
Bell, T. H. Lee waves in stratified flows with simple harmonic time dependence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 705–722 (1975).
St. Laurent, L., & Garrett, C. The role of internal tides in mixing the deep ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 2882–2899 (2002).
Kundu P. K., & Cohen, I. M. Fluid Mechanics Second Edition. Academic Press, 730pp (2002).
Lee, H. I., Wang, Y. H., Yang, Y. & Wang, D. P. Temporal variability of internal tides in the northeast South China Sea. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007518 (2012).
Xu, Z., Yin, B., Hou, Y. & Xu, Y. Variability of internal tides and nearinertial waves on the continental slope of the northwestern South China Sea. J. Geophys. Res. 118(1), 197–211 (2013).
Yadidya, B., Rao, A. D. & Latha, G. Investigation of internal tides variability in the Andaman Sea: Observations and simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 127, e2021JC018321 (2022).
Hughes, K. G. & Klymak, J. M. Tidal conversion and dissipation at steep topography in a channel poleward of the critical latitude. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 49, 1269–1291 (2019).
Pickering, A. & Alford, M. H. Velocity structure of internal tide beams emanating from Kaena Ridge. Hawaii. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 1039–1044 (2012).
Kelly, S. M., Jones, N. L., Nash, J. D. & Waterhouse, A. F. The geography of semidiurnal mode1 internaltide energy loss. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4689–4693 (2013).
Nakamura, T. et al. The generation of largeamplitude unsteady lee waves by subinertial K_{1} tidal flow: A possible vertical mixing mechanism in the Kuril Straits. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 30, 1601–1621 (2000).
Vlasenko, V., Stashchuk, N., & Hutter, K. Baroclinic tides: Theoretical modeling and observational evidence (365 pp.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2005).
Kerry, C. G., Powell, B. S. & Carter, G. S. Effects of remote generation sites on model estimates of M2 internal tides in the Philippine Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 43(1), 187–204 (2013).
Nash, J. D., Alford, M. H. & Kunze, E. Estimating internal wave energy fluxes in the Ocean. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech. 22, 1551–1570 (2005).
Buijsman, M. C. et al. Semidiurnal internal tide incoherence in the equatorial Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012590 (2017).
Kang, D. & Fringer, O. Energetics of barotropic and baroclinic tides in the monterey Bay Area. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 272–290 (2012).
Alford, M. H. et al. Energy flux and dissipation in Luzon Strait: Two tales of two ridges. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 2211–2222 (2011).
Carter, G. S. et al. Energetics of M2 barotropictobaroclinic tidal conversion at the Hawaiian Islands. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2205–2223 (2008).
Musgrave, R. C. et al. The influence of subinertial internal tides on neartopographic turbulence at the Mendocino Ridge: Observations and modeling. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 47, 2139–2154 (2017).
Echeverri, P. & Peacock, T. Internal tide generation by arbitrary twodimensional topography. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 247–266 (2010).
Falahat, S. & Nycander, J. On the generation of bottomtrapped internal tides. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 526–544 (2014).
Zhao, Z., Alford, M. H., MacKinnon, J. A. & Pinkel, R. Longrange propagation of the semidiurnal internal tide from the Hawaiian Ridge. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 713–736 (2010).
Johnston, T., Rudnick, D. L. & Kelly, S. M. Standing internal tides in the tasman sea observed by gliders. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 45, 2715–2737 (2015).
He, Y. & Lamb, K. G. Effects of an alongshelf current on the generation of internal tides near the critical latitude. J. Fluid Mech. 932, A55 (2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors deeply thank Drs. Ilker Fer and Algot K. Peterson for sharing the moored observations. This study was supported by Finance Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (ZDKJ202019), CAS Key Deployment Project of Centre for Ocean MegaResearch of Science (COMS2020Q07), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41876015, 42176244).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.W., A.C. and Q.L. conceived the research. A.C. processed the observational data. S.W. performed the numerical simulations. S.W and A.C. wrote the first draft of the paper with the contributions from Q.L. and X.C. to the revisions. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Cao, A., Li, Q. et al. Diurnal and semidiurnal internal waves on the southern slope of the Yermak Plateau. Sci Rep 12, 11682 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598022156620
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598022156620
 Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by

Trapped tidal currents generate freely propagating internal waves at the Arctic continental slope
Scientific Reports (2023)