Abstract
Neoparamoeba perurans, the aetiological agent of amoebic gill disease, remains a persistent threat to Atlantic salmon mariculture operations worldwide. Innovation in methods of AGD control is required yet constrained by a limited understanding of the mechanisms of amoebic gill disease pathogenesis. In the current study, a comparative transcriptome analysis of two N. perurans isolates of contrasting virulence phenotypes is presented using gill-associated, virulent (wild type) isolates, and in vitro cultured, avirulent (clonal) isolates. Differential gene expression analysis identified a total of 21,198 differentially expressed genes between the wild type and clonal isolates, with 5674 of these genes upregulated in wild type N. perurans. Gene set enrichment analysis predicted gene sets enriched in the wild type isolates including, although not limited to, cortical actin cytoskeleton, pseudopodia, phagocytosis, macropinocytic cup, and fatty acid beta-oxidation. Combined, the results from these analyses suggest that upregulated gene expression associated with lipid metabolism, oxidative stress response, protease activity, and cytoskeleton reorganisation is linked to pathogenicity in wild type N. perurans. These findings provide a foundation for future AGD research and the development of novel therapeutic and prophylactic AGD control measures for commercial aquaculture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Neoparamoeba perurans is a free-living, facultative parasite of a variety of marine farmed aquaculture species1, and the aetiological agent of amoebic gill disease (AGD)2. A potentially lethal gill disorder without therapeutic intervention3,4, progression of AGD compromises normal gill function, as N. perurans interactions with gill epithelia result in hyperplastic mucoid patches and subsequent loss of respiratory and osmoregulatory structure5. Although amoebae from the genus Neoparamoeba appear to be ubiquitously distributed in the coastal marine environment6, prevalent outbreaks of AGD were initially limited to Tasmanian Atlantic salmon mariculture operations3. However, throughout the last decade, AGD has emerged globally as a significant source of economic loss and a threat to animal welfare in commercial Atlantic salmon aquaculture, with outbreaks now reported in most Northern and Southern Hemisphere salmon producing regions1,7.
Commercially viable therapeutic control measures for AGD in contemporary Atlantic salmon aquaculture are limited to non-medicinal freshwater or hydrogen peroxide bathing treatments8,9, typically administered via well-boat. While both treatments are effective in reducing AGD-associated pathology in affected cohorts, a subset of gill-associated N. perurans typically survive exposure, facilitating rapid post-bathing proliferation and reinfection of the host8,10,11. To mitigate AGD progression in sea farmed Atlantic salmon, 8-to-13- bathing treatments are required over the duration of a 15-to-18-month marine production cycle12,13. Current estimates of the operational costs imposed by labour and infrastructure requirements, and cumulative handling mortalities inherent to reiterative bathing treatments over a production cycle13, are not publicly available. However, early estimates placed the economic burden of AGD, including associated loses and freshwater bathing treatments, at 10–20% of total production costs14. Given the high associated costs, and, in the case of freshwater treatments, heavy reliance on finite freshwater supplies, current bathing treatments are not considered long-term solutions for the industry13.
Development of alternative therapeutic AGD mitigation strategies has been met with limited experimental success, with few achieving results comparable to freshwater or hydrogen peroxide treatments15,16,17. Despite decades of research, oral delivery of the anthelminthic, bithionol, or L-cystine ethyl ester have been the only alternatives to therapeutic bathing methods to achieve comparable protective efficacy against N. perurans17,18. While vaccination is considered key to effective disease control in intensive finfish culture19,20, owing to their biological complexity and the intricacies of host-parasite interactions, identification of protective antigens from fish parasites has remained elusive20. Accordingly, to date, administration of experimental vaccine candidates to Atlantic salmon has elicited, at best, a marginal protective antibody response against N. perurans21,22,23,24,25,26. Until recent advances, the limited progress made towards identifying the mechanisms by which N. perurans induce AGD has actively hindered development of alternative methods of AGD control.
In the absence of a publicly available reference genome, de novo transcriptome assembly and proteomic profiling provide valuable tools for the identification of N. perurans virulence determinants. Proteomic analyses have revealed distinct protein expression profiles between virulence-attenuated and malt yeast agar (MYA) cultured wild type N. perurans isolates27,28. With focus on soluble, cytoplasmic content, upregulated expression of proteins supporting wild type N. perurans cytoskeletal re-organisation, protein synthesis, response to oxidative stress, and putative host immunomodulation have been reported27. Exoproteomic analysis of cultured wild type N. perurans demonstrated serine protease activity in the extracellular product of virulence-attenuated N. perurans, in which the N. perurans commensal microbiome was partially attributed. Notably, in contrast to a previous in vitro observation29, this cell cytopathic effect was found to be absent in virulent N. perurans cultures28. Combined transcriptomic profiling of Atlantic salmon and cultured wild type N. perurans has been conducted, wherein a theoretical model for the host-parasite interactions involved in AGD pathogenesis was described30. However, transcriptomic analysis comparing N. perurans isolates with clear differences in their degree of virulence and comparisons using gill harvested wild type N. perurans not subject to serial passage has yet to be conducted.
Here, a comparative transcriptomic analysis of virulent wild type and avirulent clonal N. perurans isolates is presented. In contrast to wild type N. perurans, harvested directly from the gills of AGD-infected Atlantic salmon, the clonal strain of N. perurans used in the current study has been observed to be non-pathogenic towards Atlantic salmon in vivo29. This process of virulence attenuation in N. perurans through serial passage in vitro has been replicated by other research groups27,31. Common to these virulence-attenuated isolates is the absence of AGD-related gill pathology and gill-associated N. perurans detection in challenged Atlantic salmon27,29,31, despite detection of trophozoites in the water column of challenge systems29,31. Leveraging observed differences in pathogenicity, the current study aimed to characterise gene expression changes between wild type and clonal N. perurans to elucidate potential determinants of virulence, and to identify putative therapeutic or vaccine candidates for future characterisation and validation.
Results
Transcriptome assembly quality
Six N. perurans samples (three wild type and three clonal isolates) totalling 382 million pairs of 101 base length paired-end reads were generated from an Illumina Hiseq sequencing platform. Following pre-processing of samples prior to transcriptome assembly, a total of 378 million pairs from these six N. perurans samples were retained for assembly of contigs (Table S1B and C). From the Trinity assembly, a total of 86,517 transcripts clustered into 66,361 putative gene groupings (hereinafter referred to as genes for brevity) were generated (median transcript length: 507 bases, N50: 1155 bases; Table S1A). Evaluation based on BUSCO found 216 (84.7%) core, eukaryotic ortholog genes represented in the N. perurans transcriptome, with 27.8% duplicated contigs and a small percentage of fragmented or missing genes (C:84.7% [S:56.9%, D:27.8%], F:8.2%, M:7.1%, n:255). The high number of core eukaryotic ortholog genes is indicative of the relative completeness of the N. perurans transcriptome presented in the current study.
Transcriptome annotation
Transcripts were annotated using Trinotate leveraging Blastx to homology search the Swiss-Prot and the NCBI non-redundant (NR) databases, resulting in 28,840 (33.3%) and 41,550 (48.0%) positive identities, respectively. Approximately 14.1% of annotated transcripts were assigned best hit to sequences of the top five eukaryotic species, including Perkinsela sp. CCAP 1560/4, Acanthamoeba castellanii str. Neff, Arabidopsis thaliana, Dictyostelium discoideum and Symbiodinium microadriaticum. Of the transcripts assigned best hit using the NCBI NR database, approximately 35.1% were assigned to uninformative hypothetical, or uncharacterised proteins. Utilising Blastx and Blastp homology searches against the Swiss-Prot database and pfam2go, a total of 28,238 (98.0%) annotated transcripts were assigned to at least one GO term belonging to the three GO domains: biological process (63.9%), molecular function (22.2%), and cellular component (14.9%).
Differential gene expression analysis
Principal component analysis and clustering of normalised gene counts revealed distinct variation between the expression profiles of wild type and clonal N. perurans samples and expected clustering between biological triplicates, with some deviation observed between wild type replicates (Fig. 1). No significant outliers were detected, and all RNAseq samples were retained for downstream analysis. On average, of the 66,361 genes predicted, 41,583 (62.7%) were expressed in the wild type isolates, while 57,937 (87.3%) were expressed in the clonal isolates. Facilitating a comparative approach to detect transcripts potentially associated with wild type N. perurans pathogenicity, differential gene expression analysis identified 21,198 genes differentially expressed between the wild type and clonal isolates (Wald test; Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted P value < 0.05 and log2 fold change > 2). Of these genes, 5,674 were found to be upregulated in wild type N. perurans, with the remaining 15,525 genes showing downregulated expression (Fig. 2; Table S2). Annotation of differentially expressed genes in wild type N. perurans, leveraging the Swiss-Prot database, resulted in a total of 7,921 (37%) positive identities. When leveraging the NCBI Nr database, the percentage of annotated gene increased to 53%, with a total of 11,232 positive identities.
Heatmap (A) of sample-to-sample differences and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) (B) of the top 500 most variable genes using normalised (variance stabilising transformation) RNAseq data generated following raw read processing and de novo assembly using Trinity. Jitter was added to the PCA plot to avoid overplotting of replicates.
Heatmap (A) and volcano plot (B) of all differentially expressed genes comparing wild type versus clonal N. perurans isolates. Heatmap shading delineates the difference in Z-score between differentially expressed genes. A full list of differentially expressed genes is included in Table S2.
Upregulated differentially expressed genes, along with genes associated with enriched pathways (presented in Sect. "Gene set enrichment analysis"; Fig. 3) in wild type N. perurans isolates, were assigned to four categories of potential, putative virulence determinants inferred from other parasitic amoeba species. These broadly defined categories included genes associated with N. perurans cytoskeleton reorganisation, response to oxidative stress, protease activity, and lipid metabolism. Upregulated genes encoding for putative virulence factors falling under these broadly defined categories are summarised in Table 1.
Gene set enrichment analysis delineating the gene sets (nodes) significantly enriched wild type N. perurans isolates with respect to the biological process, molecular function, and cellular component GO domains. Node size reflects the total number of genes within the gene set. Edge thickness of lines between nodes represents the degree of similarity between gene sets (Overlap Coefficient = 0.5). A full list of genes associated with the upregulated gene sets of the wild type isolates is included in Table S4.
Gene set enrichment analysis
Using gene expression data from the entire N. perurans transcriptome, GSEA querying gene sets from the three GO domains, biological processes, molecular function, and cellular component, revealed 978 / 5354 gene sets putatively assigned by homology were upregulated in wild type N. perurans isolates. Of these gene sets, 206 were significantly enriched at a nominal P value of < 0.001 (Table S3). Gene sets potentially linked with putative virulence factors in wild type N. perurans isolates were identified using GSEA. Highly enriched gene sets putatively associated with actin-cytoskeleton in N. perurans, included cortical actin cytoskeleton (cellular component) and actin-binding, with associated gene sets therein, including actin filament binding (molecular function), actin crosslink formation, and actin filament bundle assembly (biological process). Additional highly enriched gene sets associated with mechanisms putatively mediated by actin-myosin processes in N. perurans were also significantly enriched, including pseudopodia, macropinocytic cup (cellular component), and phagocytosis (biological process). Finally, processes putatively associated with lipid metabolism in N. perurans were highly enriched in wild type isolates, involving gene sets for fatty acid beta-oxidation and the associated child terms, fatty acid beta-oxidation acyl-CoA oxidase, (biological process), and acyl-CoA oxidase activity (molecular function). Genes included in the enriched gene sets of the wild type N. perurans isolates displayed in Fig. 3 can be found in Table S4.
Discussion
Therapeutic treatments in contemporary Atlantic salmon mariculture, including freshwater bathing and hydrogen peroxide bathing, persist as the primary commercially viable methods of AGD control7,32. While development of alternative AGD control methods has largely been hindered by the limited progress made towards identifying N. perurans virulence determinants, advances in omics-based approaches have provided valuable tools by which therapeutic targets and vaccine candidates can be identified. Here, leveraging comparative transcriptomic analysis of confirmed virulent and avirulent N. perurans isolates, four categories of putative virulence determinants, encompassing genes encoding for cytoskeleton reorganisation, response to oxidative stress, protease activity, and lipid metabolism were identified.
Dynamic reorganisation of the cytoskeleton, typically by actin-myosin mediated processes, is necessary for cell motility and phagocytosis in amoeboid eukaryotes and, by extension, host colonisation by parasitic amoebae33,34. Here, cytoskeleton, cell motility, phagocytosis, and pseudopodium associated gene sets, of which actin is an essential component, were amongst the most highly enriched in the wild type isolates. Accordingly, an actin homologue (Physarum polycephalum), β-actin homologue (Paramoeba pemaquidensis), and two myosin-1 homologues (Acanthamoeba castellanii) were highly expressed in both clonal and wild type isolates, although significantly upregulated in the wild type amoebae. Considered a pathogenicity factor in other parasitic amoebae35,36, knockdown of actin gene expression of N. pemaquidensis has been shown to result in trophozoite transformation into an immobile cyst-like state37, suggesting actin-mediated processes are essential in supporting functions necessary for virulence in N. perurans.
To support the dynamic reorganisation of the cytoskeleton, actin-binding proteins are required to regulate actin assembly34. Three gene sets associated with actin assembly regulation, including actin-filament binding, actin crosslink formation, and actin binding were highly enriched in the wild type isolates. Within these gene sets, homologues of severin and gelsolin/villin family proteins were upregulated. Severin and villin appear to play a role in cytoskeleton dynamics38,39 and upregulated expression of these proteins has previously been observed in highly virulent cultures of N. fowleri40,41. Upregulated gene expression of profilin and formin homologues were also observed in the wild type amoebae. Profilin and formin are necessary for formation and elongation of actin filaments42 and have been shown to play an essential role in pseudopodia formation and phagocytosis in E. histolytica43, which correlate with its in vivo capacity for virulence44. While the association between N. perurans phagocytic capacity and AGD pathogenesis has not been determined31, a defining characteristic of clonal N. perurans avirulence is the incapacity for host attachment and associated initiation of AGD in Atlantic salmon29. Ultrastructural evidence suggests that N. perurans pseudopodia may extend into the gill epithelium45,46, potentially facilitating a form of host attachment, and implicating presumably actin-myosin mediated processes in AGD pathogenesis.
Eukaryotic elongation factors are highly conserved house-keeping polypeptides involved in protein synthesis and a variety of other cellular processes47, identified as protective vaccine candidates against several protozoan parasites48,49. Two transcripts putatively encoding for elongation factor 1 alpha (eEFA1; Paramoeba branchiphila) and elongation factor 2 (eEF2; Colpoda inflata) were exclusively expressed in the wild type isolate, along with highly upregulated expression of a bacterial elongation factor thermo unstable (EF-Tu; Novosphingobium aerophilum) homologue. Protein homologues of eEFA1 and potentially EF-Tu have previously been identified in N. perurans isolates27. Functionally, Neoparamoeba spp. eEFA1 appears to play a role in cell cytoskeleton dynamics, with knockdown using recombinantly produced N. pemaquidensis eEFA1 demonstrated to influence cell shape, and to reduce cell motility and pseudopodia radiation37. Similar eEFA1 function has been observed in E. histolytica, with co-localisation of eEFA1 and actin in pseudopodia and at sites of adhesion suggested to promote phagocytosis and play a role in pathogenicity50. Considering the promising protective effect provided by eEFA1 vaccine candidates against other parasitic protozoans48,49, the upregulated expression of putative elongation factors in wild type N. perurans isolates warrants further investigation of their antigenic properties and potential role in pathogenicity.
Antioxidant enzymes constitute an established defence mechanism that protects parasites from endogenously produced and exogenous sources of reactive oxygen species51. Colonisation of N. perurans stimulates gill infiltration with inflammatory immune cells5,46, wherein a key process of host phagocyte antimicrobial activity is the production of reactive oxygen species52. Here, four transcripts with homology to the superoxide dismutases and two transcripts with homology to peroxiredoxins were highly expressed in both the wild type and clonal isolates, with significant upregulated expression observed in the wild type isolates. While the expression of superoxide dismutases has previously been reported in transcriptomic30 and proteomic analyses27,28 of xenic cultures of virulent N. perurans, the current study is the first to report gene expression of N. perurans peroxiredoxin homologues. Expression of peroxiredoxins and superoxide dismutases, primarily through enzyme mediated protection against host immune effector cells, have been attributed to pathogenicity in other parasitic amoebae species, including E. histolytica53,54, N. fowleri55 and A. castellanii56. Trophozoite survival during gill colonisation under host-mediated inflammatory conditions and with exposure to the gill-localised oxidative stress associated with AGD progression57 is indicative of the significance of endogenous antioxidant production in N. perurans pathogenicity.
Extracellular proteases are commonly described determinants of virulence in parasitic amoeba species that enable host invasion by facilitating host cell destruction and immune cell degradation58,59,60. As reported in these species, a contact-independent cell cytopathic effect has also been observed in vitro in N. perurans29. Previous proteomic analysis has implicated an S8 and S53 domain containing protein in this extracellular cytopathic effect, although attributed to virulence-attenuated N. perurans cultures, while highlighting the absence of its expression in virulent N. perurans cultures28. In contrast, in the current study, gene expression of the N. perurans peptidase S8, and S53 domain-containing protein was significantly upregulated in the wild type isolates relative to clonal N. perurans cultures. Here, cell lysis and subsequent RNA extraction from wild type isolates was performed directly after gill isolation, as opposed to gill isolation and subsequent 70-day xenic MYA culture of N. perurans prior to processing as previously described28. Although based on the implicit assumption that differential mRNA expression reflects protein level differences, wild type gene expression of proteases putatively associated with N. perurans cell cytotoxicity is indicative of external stimuli mediating production of extracellular product. Host stimulated secretion of cytopathic proteases has been observed in A. castellanii following exposure to host cell surface mannose residues59. Nonetheless, further in vitro validation of the potential need for external stimuli in production of wild type N. perurans extracellular product is required.
Cathepsins are a family of potent lysosomal proteases, of which some members retain activity outside of the endo/lysosomal system, that potentially support host invasion, and nutrient uptake in several parasitic amoeba species60,61. Through association with the putative role of these proteases in parasitic amoeba pathogenicity, expression of cathepsin B homologues in N. perurans has been suggested to play a role in AGD pathogenesis30. Here, gene expression of a cathepsin B domain containing protein with homology to N. fowleri cathepsin B, and two additional aspartic and cysteine cathepsin homologues, were upregulated in the wild type isolates. Naegleria fowleri cathepsin B, while localised in food cups and pseudopodia, is readily secreted and has been implicated in contact-independent pathology60,62. Notably, in previous research, cathepsin family protein expression was absent from the extracellular product of both clonal and wild type N. perurans cultures28, suggesting that these proteases do not play a role in excretory-secretory host cell lysis as observed in other parasitic amoeba. However, given the relevance of cathepsins as therapeutic or vaccine targets against parasites63,64, the upregulated expression of genes encoding for putative cathepsins in wild type N. perurans warrants further investigation of the potential role of these proteases in AGD pathogenesis.
Fatty acid oxidation encompasses a subset of catabolic processes in fatty acid metabolism that generate energy for cellular function65. Here, lipid oxidation, including gene sets associated with fatty acid beta oxidation and acyl-CoA oxidase activity, was highly enriched in the wild type isolates. While no studies to date have reported information regarding N. perurans fatty acid metabolism, the closely related N. pemaquidensis and endosymbiont, Perkinsela sp., appear to encode a complete set of genes required for fatty acid β-oxidation involving mitochondria and a glycosome/peroxisome-like organelle66. Previous research has shown in vitro that N. gruberi has an energy substrate preference for fatty acid oxidation67. Predicted to have the same preference, upregulation of genes associated with fatty acid oxidation has previously been observed in N. fowleri following mouse passage40, and inhibition of fatty acid oxidation using approved therapeutics has been demonstrated to impede trophozoite growth in vitro68. Currently, it is not known if fatty acid oxidation is necessary for N. perurans viability. However, the upregulated expression of genes putatively involved in N. perurans fatty acid oxidation highlights fatty acids as a potentially important energy substrate during gill colonisation and AGD pathogenesis.
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of virulent, gill-associated wild type N. perurans and confirmed avirulent, clonal N. perurans cultures revealed distinct gene expression profiles between the two phenotypes. Through identification of upregulated gene expression in wild type N. perurans and subsequent GSEA, genes putatively encoding for N. perurans virulence determinants were categorised under cytoskeleton reorganisation, response to oxidative stress, protease activity, and lipid metabolism. Given the paucity of knowledge concerning N. perurans biology and AGD pathogenesis, many of the putative virulence determinants presented here were inferred from other parasitic amoeba species. While the identification of potential therapeutic and vaccine candidates provides a foundation for the development of hypotheses for future AGD research, the necessity of further investigation of the mechanisms by which N. perurans induce AGD is emphasised.
Methodology
Neoparamoeba perurans culture and sample collection
Clonal and wild type N. perurans isolates were obtained from the University of Tasmania (Launceston, Tasmania, Australia). Clonal (clone 4) N. perurans were cultured on MYA plates as described previously69 for approximately 1,095 days prior to use in the current study and have been demonstrated to be avirulent29. Wild type N. perurans were isolated directly from the gills of Atlantic salmon derived from commercial stock, held at the University of Tasmania Aquaculture Centre (Launceston, Tasmania) using previously published methods70. Three separate wild type isolations were obtained from AGD mortality events over a period of one week. Each isolation was made up of 6 × 105 to 9 × 105 amoebae. Isolated wild type trophozoites were not subjected to MYA plate culture. Following gill isolation, wild type N. perurans were concentrated by centrifugation (550 g, 6 min at 4 °C) and immediately lysed with a lysis buffer (4 M Urea, 0.5% SDS, 50 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA) and retained for further processing.
Clonal N. perurans isolations were pooled from multiple culture plates, with each isolation consisting of 5 × 104 to 3 × 105 amoebae. To harvest clonal N. perurans from MYA agar plates, amoebae were dislodged from the agar with gentle agitation using a plate spreader. The resulting supernatant was collected in a 50 mL microcentrifuge tube and vortexed for 3 s. The supernatant was then placed on a magnetic stirrer at half speed for 3 min to dislodge amoebae trapped in viscous culture medium. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 550 g for 5 min at room temperature to concentrate. After the supernatant was discarded, sterile seawater was added, and the pellet resuspended by gentle agitation. From this, 2 mL was transferred into individual wells of 6-well cell culture plates and amoebae were allowed to attach for 30 min. The supernatant was then discarded, attached amoebae were washed with sterile sea water, and double concentration lysis buffer immediately added to lyse cells for further processing.
Total nucleic acid and RNA extraction
Total RNA was extracted from N. perurans trophozoites using lysis buffer and purified using TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia), with an on-column DNase treatment step (Baseline-ZERO DNase, Lucigen, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA yields were determined spectrophotometrically using Qubit broad range RNA assays (ThermoFisher, Australia), and RNA integrity was estimated using gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel. For sequencing, from pooled wild type and clonal N. perurans RNA samples, 3 × 1.84 µg aliquots of wild type isolate RNA, and 3 × 1.70 µg aliquots of clonal isolate RNA were prepared and stored as ethanol precipitates (2.5 M ammonium acetate, 100% ethanol).
RNA sequencing and De novo transcriptome assembly
Purified RNA from clonal (n = 3) and wild type (n = 3) N. perurans isolates was delivered to Macrogen Inc., for library preparation for RNA sequencing (RNAseq). The sequencing workflow consisted of mRNA library preparation using reagents provided in the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT sample prep kit following the protocol, TruSeq Stranded mRNA sample preparation guide, part #15,031,047 Rev. E. Sequencing was conducted using an Illumina Hiseq system as 101 base paired-end reads, with an input quantity of 1 µg total RNA per sample.
Prior to transcriptome assembly, the quality of raw RNAseq reads was assessed using FastQC (www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Random sequencing errors were corrected with rCorrector71. In read pairs where at least one read was deemed unfixable, the “FilterUncorrectabledPEfastq.py” python script was used to discard these unfixable read pairs and to remove the “cor” header tags for downstream analysis (https://github.com/harvardinformatics/TranscriptomeAssemblyTools). Residual adapter sequences and low-quality bases (phred < 5) were trimmed using the Trim Galore! wrapper application72, with read pairs equal to or longer than 36 bp retained post-filtering. As wild type N. perurans were harvested from the gills of AGD-affected Atlantic salmon prior to RNA extraction, STAR 73 was used to map wild type and, to remain consistent, clonal N. perurans RNAseq reads to the Atlantic salmon genome assembly (ICSASG_v2; Genbank accession GCF_000233375.4) to remove host sequences. Residual rRNA was removed from RNAseq reads by mapping to the SILVA rRNA database74 using Bowtie275. Processed RNAseq reads from three wild type and three clonal samples were then assembled with Trinity76 using default parameters.
Assembly quality and transcript abundance estimation
Read support for the assembled transcriptome was quantified by mapping paired end RNAseq reads back to the assembled transcriptome using Bowtie2. For quantitative assessment of de novo transcriptome assembly quality and completeness, the presence of Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) was analysed using the conserved eukaryotic proteins (eukaryota_odb10, created 2020–09-10) database. To reduce the proportion of reported duplicates, the transcriptome assembly was filtered for isoforms prior to BUSCO analysis. After assessment of transcriptome quality, alignment-free transcript abundance was quantified by mapping filtered reads in Fastq format to the assembled transcriptome using Salmon77. A gene expression matrix was constructed using the “abundance_estimates_to_matrix.pl” python script included in the Trinity package.
Transcriptome annotation
Transcriptome assembly annotation was performed using Trinotate78. In brief, putative coding regions were extracted from the transcriptome assembly using TransDecoder (http://transdecoder.github.io) with default parameters and annotated by mapping transcripts and these putative coding regions separately using Blast leveraging Swiss-Prot and pfam databases. The NCBI NR database was included as a custom Blastx search using diamond with the “–very-sensitive” command line option79. All Blast searches were conducted with an expect value (e-value) cut-off of < 1 × 10–5, with the top blast hit used for annotation. Gene Ontology (GO) terms were assigned from best-matching Swiss-Prot annotations of homologous proteins, pfam2go, and eggnog database mapping. A custom gene matrix transposed (gmt) file was produced by extracting GO assignments from the Trinotate output file using the “extract_GO_assignments_from_Trinotate_xls.pl” script from the Trinity package. The resulting file was formatted for GSEA using a custom perl script.
Bioinformatic analyses
Bioinformatic analyses were performed in R v4.0280 and the GSEA desktop application v4.1.081 at the gene level using genes predicted by Trinity. The RNAseq dataset was evaluated for significant outliers using both principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering. Differential gene expression analysis was conducted using DESeq282, with gene-level abundance count data normalisation using the variance stabilising transformation (VST) function performed for downstream exploratory analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The Wald test was used to generate p values and Log2 fold changes comparing the wild type to clonal N. perurans isolates. Genes with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted P values less than 0.05 and a log2 fold change (Log2FC) equal to or greater than one were considered differentially expressed. Gene set enrichment analysis81 was used to identify gene sets with statistically significant differences in expression between the wild type and clonal N. perurans isolates. All transcripts putatively assigned to genes by trinity, presented as a gene count matrix normalised using variance stabilising transformation (VST), were subjected to GSEA using a custom GMT file (produced as described in Sect. "Transcriptome annotation") as the reference gene sets file. Default parameters were used for GSEA, with gene sets smaller than 15 and larger than 500 excluded and significance tested using gene set permutation (2500 permutations). Results from GSEA were visualised using the Enrichment Map plugin for Cytoscape83 with default parameters.
Data availability
Data supporting this study are included within the article, the supplementary material, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (BioProject: PRJNA800826).
References
Oldham, T., Rodger, H. & Nowak, B. F. Incidence and distribution of amoebic gill disease (AGD)—An epidemiological review. Aquaculture 457, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.013 (2016).
Young, N., Crosbie, P., Adams, M., Nowak, B. & Morrison, R. Neoparamoeba perurans n. sp., an agent of amoebic gill disease of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Int. J. Parasitol. 37, 1469–1481 (2007).
Munday, B., Foster, C., Roubal, F. & Lester, R. in Pathology in marine science. Proceedings of the Third International Colloquium on Pathology in Marine Aquaculture, held in Gloucester Point, Virginia, USA, October 2–6, 1988. 215–222 (Academic Press Inc.).
Steinum, T. et al. First cases of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in Norwegian seawater farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and phylogeny of the causative amoeba using 18S cDNA sequences. J. Fish Dis. 31, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00893.x (2008).
Adams, M. & Nowak, B. Amoebic gill disease: sequential pathology in cultured Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.. J. Fish Dis. 26, 601–614 (2003).
Page, F. C. The classification of ‘naked’amoebae (Phylum Rhizopoda). Arch. Protistenk. 133, 199–217 (1987).
Rodger, H. Amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed salmon (Salmo salar) in Europe. Fish Veter. J. 14 (2014).
Adams, M. B., Crosbie, P. B. B. & Nowak, B. F. Preliminary success using hydrogen peroxide to treat Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., affected with experimentally induced amoebic gill disease (AGD). J. Fish Dis. 35, 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2012.01422.x (2012).
Foster, C. & Percival, S. Paramoebic gill disease. Occurrence of Paramoeba in Tasmania. Saltas Aquanote (1988).
Parsons, H., Nowak, B., Fisk, D. & Powell, M. Effectiveness of commercial freshwater bathing as a treatment against amoebic gill disease in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 195, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00567-6 (2001).
Clark, G., Powell, M. & Nowak, B. Effects of commercial freshwater bathing on reinfection of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, with Amoebic Gill Disease. Aquaculture 219, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00020-6 (2003).
Kube, P. D., Taylor, R. S. & Elliott, N. G. Genetic variation in parasite resistance of Atlantic salmon to amoebic gill disease over multiple infections. Aquaculture 364–365, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.08.026 (2012).
Taylor, R. S., Muller, W. J., Cook, M. T., Kube, P. D. & Elliott, N. G. Gill observations in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.) during repeated amoebic gill disease (AGD) field exposure and survival challenge. Aquaculture 290, 1–8 (2009).
Munday, B. L., Zilberg, D. & Findlay, V. Gill disease of marine fish caused by infection with Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis. J. Fish Dis. 24, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2001.00329.x (2001).
Harris, J., Powell, M., Attard, M. & Green, T. Efficacy of chloramine-T as a treatment for amoebic gill disease (AGD) in marine Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquacult. Res. 35, 1448–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01170.x (2004).
Findlay, V., Zilberg, D. & Munday, B. Evaluation of levamisole as a treatment for amoebic gill disease of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J. Fish Dis. 23, 193–198 (2000).
Florent, R. L., Becker, J. & Powell, M. D. Further development of bithionol therapy as a treatment for amoebic gill disease in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.. J. Fish Dis. 32, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.01001.x (2009).
Roberts, S. D. & Powell, M. D. Oral L-cysteine ethyl ester (LCEE) reduces amoebic gill disease (AGD) in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Dis. Aquat. Org. 66, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao066021 (2005).
Assefa, A. & Abunna, F. Maintenance of fish health in aquaculture: Review of epidemiological approaches for prevention and control of infectious disease of fish. Veter. Med. Int. 2018, 5432497. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5432497 (2018).
Shivam, S., El-Matbouli, M. & Kumar, G. Development of fish parasite vaccines in the OMICs era: Progress and opportunities. Vaccines 9, 179 (2021).
Valdenegro-Vega, V. A., Cook, M., Crosbie, P., Bridle, A. R. & Nowak, B. F. Vaccination with recombinant protein (r22C03), a putative attachment factor of Neoparamoeba perurans, against AGD in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and implications of a co-infection with Yersinia ruckeri. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 44, 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2015.03.016 (2015).
Cook, M. et al. Amoebic Gill Disease (AGD) Vaccine development Phase II-molecular basis of host-pathogen interactions in amoebic gill disease. Aquafin Cooperat. Res. Centre Sustain. Aquacult. Finfish Project 3 (2008).
Villavedra, M. et al. Characterisation of an immunodominant, high molecular weight glycoprotein on the surface of infectious Neoparamoeba spp., causative agent of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in Atlantic salmon. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 29, 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2010.07.036 (2010).
Morrison, R. N. & Nowak, B. F. Bath treatment of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with amoebae antigens fails to affect survival to subsequent amoebic gill disease (AGD) challenge. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 25 (2005).
Zilberg, D. & Munday. Responses of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., to Paramoeba antigens administered by a variety of routes. J. Fish Dis. 24, 181–183, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2001.00280.x (2001).
Mostafa, A., Munday, B. L., Rough, K. & Whittington, R. Immunological aspects of amoebic gill disease in salmonids. Dis. Aquat. Org. 25, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao025023 (1996).
Ní Dhufaigh, K. et al. Comparative proteomic profiling of newly acquired, virulent and attenuated Neoparamoeba perurans proteins associated with amoebic gill disease. Sci. Rep. 11, 6830. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85988-8 (2021).
Ní Dhufaigh, K. et al. Differential exoproteome and biochemical characterisation of Neoparamoeba perurans. Microorganisms 9, 1258 (2021).
Bridle, A. R., Davenport, D. L., Crosbie, P. B., Polinski, M. & Nowak, B. F. Neoparamoeba perurans loses virulence during clonal culture. Int. J. Parasitol. 45, 575–578 (2015).
Botwright, N. A., Mohamed, A. R., Slinger, J., Lima, P. C. & Wynne, J. W. Host-parasite interaction of atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the ectoparasite Neoparamoeba perurans in amoebic gill disease. Front. Immunol. 12, 1900 (2021).
Cano, I. et al. In vitro gill cell monolayer successfully reproduces in vivo Atlantic salmon host responses to Neoparamoeba perurans infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 86, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.11.029 (2019).
Nowak, B. F. Neoparamoeba perurans. Fish Parasites, Pathobiology and Protection 2012, Woo, P. & Buchmann, K eds. 1–18 (2012).
González-Robles, A. et al. Acanthamoeba castellanii: identification and distribution of actin cytoskeleton. Exp. Parasitol. 119, 411–417 (2008).
Pollard, T. D. & Cooper, J. A. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science 326, 1208–1212. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175862 (2009).
Sohn, H.-J., Kim, J.-H., Shin, M.-H., Song, K.-J. & Shin, H.-J. The Nf-actin gene is an important factor for food-cup formation and cytotoxicity of pathogenic Naegleria fowleri. Parasitol. Res. 106, 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1760-y (2010).
Kumar, N. et al. EhCoactosin stabilizes actin filaments in the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004362 (2014).
Lima, P. C., Botwright, N. A., Harris, J. O. & Cook, M. Development of an in vitro model system for studying bacterially expressed dsRNA-mediated knockdown in Neoparamoeba genus. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 16, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-014-9561-4 (2014).
Hofmann, A., Noegel, A. A., Bomblies, L., Lottspeich, F. & Schleicher, M. The 100 kDa F-actin capping protein of Dictyostelium amoebae is a villin prototype ('protovillin’). FEBS Lett. 328, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(93)80968-z (1993).
Eichinger, L., Noegel, A. A. & Schleicher, M. Domain structure in actin-binding proteins: expression and functional characterization of truncated severin. J. Cell Biol. 112, 665–676 (1991).
Herman, E. K. et al. A comparative ‘omics approach to candidate pathogenicity factor discovery in the brain-eating amoeba Naegleria fowleri. bioRxiv (2020).
Zysset-Burri, D. C. et al. Genome-wide identification of pathogenicity factors of the free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri. BMC Genomics 15, 496 (2014).
Kovar, D. R., Harris, E. S., Mahaffy, R., Higgs, H. N. & Pollard, T. D. Control of the assembly of ATP- and ADP-actin by formins and profilin. Cell 124, 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.038 (2006).
Bharadwaj, R. & Bhattacharya, A. Coordinated activity of amoebic formin and profilin are essential for phagocytosis. Mol. Microbiol. (2021).
Sateriale, A., Vaithilingam, A., Donnelly, L., Miller, P. & Huston, C. D. Feed-forward regulation of phagocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica. Infect. Immun. 80, 4456–4462. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00671-12 (2012).
Wiik-Nielsen, J. et al. Morphological diversity of Paramoeba perurans trophozoites and their interaction with Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., gills. J. Fish Dis. 39, 1113–1123 (2016).
Lovy, J. et al. Ultrastructural examination of the host cellular response in the gills of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, with amoebic gill disease. Vet. Pathol. 44, 663–671 (2007).
Sasikumar, A. N., Perez, W. B. & Kinzy, T. G. The many roles of the eukaryotic elongation factor 1 complex. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 3, 543–555 (2012).
Coler, R. N., Goto, Y., Bogatzki, L., Raman, V. & Reed, S. G. Leish-111f, a recombinant polyprotein vaccine that protects against visceral Leishmaniasis by elicitation of CD4+ T cells. Infect. Immun. 75, 4648–4654. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00394-07 (2007).
Wang, S. et al. Toxoplasma gondii Elongation Factor 1-Alpha (TgEF-1α) is a novel vaccine candidate antigen against toxoplasmosis. Front. Microbiol. 8, 168–168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00168 (2017).
Zhou, H. et al. Evaluation on elongation factor 1 alpha of entamoeba histolytica interaction with the intermediate subunit of the Gal/galnac lectin and actin in phagocytosis. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090702 (2020).
Gretes, M. C., Poole, L. B. & Karplus, P. A. Peroxiredoxins in parasites. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 17, 608–633 (2012).
Havixbeck, J. J., Rieger, A. M., Wong, M. E., Hodgkinson, J. W. & Barreda, D. R. Neutrophil contributions to the induction and regulation of the acute inflammatory response in teleost fish. J. Leukoc. Biol. 99, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.3HI0215-064R (2015).
Sim, S. et al. NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species-mediated activation of ERK1/2 is required for apoptosis of human neutrophils induced by Entamoeba histolytica. J. Immunol. 174, 4279–4288 (2005).
Davis, P. H., Zhang, X., Guo, J., Townsend, R. R. & Stanley, S. L. Jr. Comparative proteomic analysis of two Entamoeba histolytica strains with different virulence phenotypes identifies peroxiredoxin as an important component of amoebic virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 1523–1532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05344.x (2006).
Kim, J. H. et al. Immunodominant antigens in Naegleria fowleri excretory–secretory proteins were potential pathogenic factors. Parasitol. Res. 105, 1675–1681 (2009).
Kim, J. Y. et al. Functional expression and characterization of an iron-containing superoxide dismutase of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Parasitol. Res. 111, 1673–1682 (2012).
Marcos-López, M. et al. Oxidative stress is associated with late-stage amoebic gill disease in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J. Fish Dis. 41, 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12699 (2018).
Moncada, D., Keller, K., Ankri, S., Mirelman, D. & Chadee, K. Antisense inhibition of Entamoeba histolytica cysteine proteases inhibits colonic mucus degradation. Gastroenterology 130, 721–730 (2006).
Hurt, M., Neelam, S., Niederkorn, J. & Alizadeh, H. Pathogenic Acanthamoeba spp. secrete a mannose-induced cytolytic protein that correlates with the ability to cause disease. Inf. Immun. 71, 6243–6255. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.71.11.6243-6255.2003 (2003).
Lee, J. et al. Novel cathepsin B and cathepsin B-like cysteine protease of Naegleria fowleri excretory–secretory proteins and their biochemical properties. Parasitol. Res. 113, 2765–2776 (2014).
Que, X. et al. Cysteine proteinases from distinct cellular compartments are recruited to phagocytic vesicles by Entamoeba histolytica. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 119, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00387-5 (2002).
Seong, G. S. et al. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against cathepsin B and cathepsin B-Like proteins of Naegleria fowleri. Exp. Parasitol. 183, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2017.09.004 (2017).
Smooker, P. M., Jayaraj, R., Pike, R. N. & Spithill, T. W. Cathepsin B proteases of flukes: The key to facilitating parasite control?. Trends Parasitol. 26, 506–514 (2010).
Sojka, D., Hartmann, D., Bartošová-Sojková, P. & Dvořák, J. Parasite cathepsin D-like peptidases and their relevance as therapeutic targets. Trends Parasitol. 32, 708–723 (2016).
Gabaldón, T., Ginger, M. L. & Michels, P. A. M. Peroxisomes in parasitic protists. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 209, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2016.02.005 (2016).
Tanifuji, G. et al. Genome sequencing reveals metabolic and cellular interdependence in an amoeba-kinetoplastid symbiosis. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).
Bexkens, M. L. et al. Lipids are the preferred substrate of the protist Naegleria gruberi, relative of a human brain pathogen. Cell Rep. 25, 537-543.e533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.055 (2018).
Sarink, M. J., Tielens, A. G. M., Verbon, A., Sutak, R. & van Hellemond, J. J. Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation as a new target to treat primary amoebic meningoencephalitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, e00344-e1320. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00344-20 (2020).
Crosbie, P., Bridle, A., Cadoret, K. & Nowak, B. In vitro cultured Neoparamoeba perurans causes amoebic gill disease in Atlantic salmon and fulfils Koch’s postulates. Int. J. Parasitol. 42, 511–515 (2012).
Adams, M. B., Bridle, A. R., Norte dos Santos, C., Pennacchi, Y. & Nowak, B. F. Comparative susceptibility and host responses of endemic fishes and salmonids to amoebic gill disease in Tasmania. 2015. Launceston (2015).
Song, L. & Florea, L. Rcorrector: Efficient and accurate error correction for Illumina RNA-seq reads. GigaScience 4, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-015-0089-y (2015).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 (2013).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
Bryant, D. M. et al. A tissue-mapped axolotl de novo transcriptome enables identification of limb regeneration factors. Cell Rep. 18, 762–776 (2017).
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x (2021).
R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ (2017).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102 (2005).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21 (2014).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Acknowledgements
This research was fully funded by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects funding scheme (project: LP160101762). The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.B, P.C, B.N and A.S conceptualised and designed the experiment. P.C developed and maintained clonal N. perurans isolates and harvested all wild type and clonal N. perurans isolates. P.C prepared all N. perurans isolates for RNA extraction and purification. A.B extracted, purified and processed RNA from all N. perurans isolates for RNAseq. A.S developed the bioinformatics methodology for the experiment, conducted all bioinformatic and statistical analyses of RNAseq data, interpreted results, produced all figures, and wrote the manuscript. Project administration, funding, resources, supervision, and critical review and edits were provided by A.B and B.N.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, A.J., Crosbie, P.B.B., Nowak, B.F. et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling of virulent and avirulent isolates of Neoparamoeba perurans. Sci Rep 12, 5860 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09806-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09806-5
- Springer Nature Limited