Abstract
The current diagnostic technologies for assessing the axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) status accurately in breast cancer (BC) remain unsatisfactory. Here, we developed a diagnostic model for evaluating the ALNM status using a combination of mRNAs and the T stage of the primary tumor as a novel biomarker. We collected relevant information on T1–2 BC from public databases. An ALNM prediction model was developed by logistic regression based on the screened signatures and then internally and externally validated. Calibration curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were employed as performance metrics. The prognostic value and tumor immune infiltration of the model were also determined. An optimal diagnostic model was created using a combination of 11 mRNAs and T stage of the primary tumor and showed high discrimination, with AUCs of 0.828 and 0.746 in the training sets. AUCs of 0.671 and 0.783 were achieved in the internal validation cohorts. The mean external AUC value was 0.686 and ranged between 0.644 and 0.742. Moreover, the new model has good specificity in T1 and hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- negative (HR−/HER2−) BC and good sensitivity in T2 BC. In addition, the risk of ALNM and 11 mRNAs were correlated with the infiltration of M2 macrophages, as well as the prognosis of BC. This novel prediction model is a useful tool to identify the risk of ALNM in T1–2 BC patients, particularly given that it can be used to adjust surgical options in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor in women, accounting for 30% of all new cancer cases around the world1. The axillary lymph node (ALN) status is an important reference factor for predicting clinical outcomes in BC2, and it also determines the degree of axillary surgery, radiation therapy, neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy. Hence, it is of clinical importance to identify axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) accurately.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for evaluating the status of ALNs in patients with T1–2 BC. However, it is an invasive surgical procedure, with a false negative (FN) rate of 9.8%3, and approximately 50–70%4 of BC patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) do not have nonsentinel ALNM. Simultaneously, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or radiotherapy may be needed for patients with positive SLNs5. The current standard assessment methods for nodal staging in patients with T1–2 BC, such as a physical examination, ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT), have been shown to be less than satisfactory6,7,8.
Hence, a less invasive method is needed to evaluate the ALN status and to safely avoid the use of SLNB in patients without ALNM. There have been increasing numbers of studies with multiple prediction models for ALNM in BC that were based on several different kinds of factors, such as a combination of radiomics and kinetic curve patterns9, ultrasound images10, and miRNAs11. Previous studies have reported that mRNAs have been implicated in metastasis, proliferation, and apoptosis in BC12,13,14. In addition, clinical factors, such as pathological tumor size, are considered influencing factors for ALNM in BC15. Therefore, the construction of a model that combines mRNAs and clinicopathological factors to predict ALNM in T1–2 BC would be feasible and innovative.
In this study, we constructed a model to predict ALNM in T1–2 BC by analyzing public databases, and we also analyzed the association between the risk of ALNM and patient survival and immune cell infiltration. Therefore, we hope that this study will provide an effective and new method to predict lymphatic metastasis accurately in BC.
Materials and methods
Public datasets
Transcriptome profiling data (including lncRNA and mRNA data) normalized to fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) and relevant clinical information on BC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were downloaded. According to the specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, 465 samples in the TCGA database and 716 samples in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were selected. All 465 patients in the TCGA were randomly divided into two independent datasets at a ratio of 7:3 based on a computer-generated random number (training dataset: 326 patients; validation dataset: 139 patients). GSE9893 served as another training dataset. The clinical characteristics of all patients are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) female BC patients with pathological stage T1-T2 disease; and (b) patients with a pathological diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma or invasive lobular carcinoma. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) patients with incomplete clinicopathological information, such as TX stage (the primary tumor could not be assessed), NX stage (regional lymph node involvement could not be assessed), and MX stage (the metastatic status could not be assessed) in the TNM staging system, and those with an uncertain estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status; (b) patients who had received preoperative adjuvant therapy; and (c) patients with distant metastasis.
Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)
The “limma” package in R was utilized to select DEGs between lymph node (LN)-positive and LN-negative patients in the TCGA/GSE9893 datasets. We used the false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and |log2FC (fold change)| > 1 as the thresholds for identifying the DEGs. A volcano diagram and a heatmap were generated using the “pheatmap” R package.
Feature selection
We employed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to further select the most diagnostically predictive features in the training datasets. The lymph node status served as the dependent variable, and a minimum λ was used for feature selection. Then, we used univariate logistic regression to filter the diagnostic features selected by the LASSO regression analysis. The LASSO regression analysis was performed with the “glmnet” package in R.
Prediction model construction and performance assessment
Using a multivariate logistic regression algorithm, we constructed a risk prediction model in the training dataset. A nomogram was formulated based on the results of the multivariable analyses by integrating multiple prediction indicators. Correspondingly, the coefficient of each feature in the model and the predicted index of each patient in the training cohort were calculated. The goodness of fit between the observed value and the predicted value was tested using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test and displayed in the calibration curve. The predictive discrimination of the model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to judge the clinical applicability of the nomogram by quantifying the net benefits at different threshold probabilities16. The prediction model was evaluated in the validation datasets. The “rms”, “ROCR” and “rmda” packages in R were applied to create the calibration curve, ROC graph and DCA curve.
Prognostic analysis
The largest Youden index was used as the cutoff value to separate the patients into high- or low-risk groups17. Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log‐rank test was subsequently performed to assess the differential outcomes in overall survival (OS) or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/) database18 was applied to analyze the difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to target gene expression.
Functional analysis and immune infiltration
We performed Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses on the DEGs using the “clusterProfiler” package in R. ImmuCellAI (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/ImmuCellAI#!/) and CIBERSORT were used to estimate tumor immune infiltration in each sample in the TCGA cohort19,20. Based on the “Gene” module of the TIMER2.0 database21 (http://timer.cistrome.org/), we further evaluated the correlation between the hub genes and the infiltration of M2 macrophages.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.0.2). The Wilcoxon rank‐sum test is a nonparametric statistical test mainly utilized for comparing two groups, and the Kruskal–Wallis test is suitable for comparing two or more groups. A conventional two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Clinical characteristics of the patients
We developed a risk prediction model for clinical ALNM in T1–2 BC patients. A flow chart of the whole study design is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. The clinical features of the patients in the training and internal validation sets in the TCGA are given in Table 1, and no differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups (P-value > 0.05). We also summarized the relevant clinical information of the BC samples from the GEO database that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Supplementary Table 1).
Development of a risk prediction model for BC
Differential gene expression analysis revealed 256 upregulated and 314 downregulated genes in the TCGA training sets (Fig. 1A). However, in the GSE9893 dataset, 2742 upregulated genes and 2176 downregulated genes were found (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the results revealed 35 common upregulated genes and 22 common downregulated genes (Fig. 1C). A total of 57 mRNAs were selected as biomarker candidates and used together with clinicopathologic factors (T stage, age, ER, PR, HER2, and subtypes) to construct a diagnostic model in the training set using LASSO regression analysis (Fig. 1D,E). The heatmap shows the correlations between the expression of the 57 mRNAs and clinicopathological variables. Compared with non-axillary lymph node metastasis (NALNM) group, the expression levels of many genes were higher in the ALNM group, such as HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB7 (Supplementary Fig. 2). In addition, the optimal value of λ in LASSO regression was 0.0185.
Subsequently, all significant factors in the univariate logistic regression analysis (Supplementary Table 2) were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, we constructed a risk prediction model that contains the T stage of the primary tumor and 11 genes in T1–2 BC, as shown in Supplementary Table 3.
Nomogram construction and validation
These 12 features that are associated with ALNM in BC were used to construct the nomogram (Fig. 2A). This nomogram can be used to estimate the probability of ALNM through the summation of the points of each variable.
To compare the discrimination ability of the model in predicting ALNM, we conducted ROC curve analysis of T1–2 BC patients. The AUC value of the model in the training set was 0.828 (95% CI: 0.783–0.873; P-value < 0.001), which indicated that the model had high prediction efficacy (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the calibration curve of the model demonstrated good agreement between the predictions and observations in the TCGA training set (Fig. 2C). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test suggested that the model had good fit (χ2 = 8.859; P-value = 0.354). Moreover, the prediction model showed a high net benefit to aid in clinical decisions for a risk probability threshold between 2 and 91% in the training set according to the DCA curve (Fig. 2D).
In the internal validation stage of the model, the AUC values were found to be 0.671, 0.746 and 0.783 (Fig. 3A–C, Supplementary Table 4). In the external validation cohort, the AUC value in the GSE11001 dataset was up to 0.742, while the AUC values in the other GEO datasets were 0.644, 0.661, 0.673, and 0.709 (Fig. 3D–H, Supplementary Table 4). The calibration curves showed great calibration of the risk prediction model in the internal and external validation cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Furthermore, the specificity of the risk prediction model in predicting ALNM in T1 BC was as high as 92.3–95.1%, and the false positive rate was between 4.9 and 7.7% (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Table 5). In patients with T2 BC, the sensitivity of the model was between 71.3 and 90.3% (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Table 6). The model also had good specificity in evaluating the risk of ALNM in HR−/HER2− BC patients (Fig. 4C, Supplementary Table 7).
The prognostic role of the risk prediction model
All patients were separated into high- or low-risk groups according to the optimal cutoff value. Kaplan–Meier analyses were subsequently performed to assess the differential outcomes between the two groups. Patients in the high-risk group had worse OS (P-value = 9.337e−07) and DMFS (P-value = 3.45e−02) (Fig. 5A,B).
To further evaluate the prognostic value of genes in the risk prediction model, the RFS of BC patients was investigated with the Kaplan–Meier Plotter database. Interestingly, the expression of ACOX1, CD1A, OPN3, REPS1, RTN1, CNP, DUT, HOXB3, and PYGB was significantly associated with the prognosis of BC (P-value < 0.05), which was consistent with the predictive value of the model (Fig. 5C).
Analysis of gene functions and tumor immune infiltration
We analyzed the common differentially expressed genes by functional enrichment analysis, and the results indicated that the abovementioned genes mostly function in the processes of antigen processing and endogenous peptide antigen (Fig. 6A), which suggests that the common genes may be associated with tumor immune infiltration. Furthermore, we evaluated the correlation between the risk of ALNM in T1–2 BC patients and the immune infiltration level with the ImmunCellAI online resource. The results showed that the risk of ALNM was related to the infiltration of tumor immune cells such as macrophages, T helper type 1 cells (Th1), T helper type 17 cells (Th17), and cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) (Fig. 6B).
We calculated the 22 subpopulations of immune cells in 685 BC patients (according to the previous inclusion and exclusion criteria of the TCGA database, patients were re-incorporated without restricting the expression of ER,PR and HER2) by using the CIBERSORT algorithm and investigated the differences between tissues with different N stages. Surprisingly, the lymph node stage was correlated with the infiltration of M2 macrophages (P-value < 0.05) (Fig. 6C). Based on the TIMER2.0 database, we further explored the functions of the 11 genes in the model, all of which were associated with the infiltration of M2 macrophages (Fig. 6D).
Discussion
ALNs are often the first and most frequent metastatic site and are the most important factor for the diagnosis and prognosis of BC22,23. In the current study, we developed and validated a risk prediction model to evaluate the probability of positive lymph nodes in patients with T1–2 BC to improve the ability of preoperative individualized treatment decisions in the future.
As mentioned previously, the risk prediction model incorporates 11 genes that may be related to ALNM and the T stage of the primary tumor. The results of this study showed that the risk of ALNM was positively correlated with tumor size, and similar results have been reported15.
To confirm the generalizability and repeatability of the established model, we used internal verification and external verification cohorts for further analysis. Generally, an AUC value greater than 0.75 indicates high accuracy, 0.75 to 0.6 indicates general accuracy, and less than 0.6 indicates low accuracy24. In this study, the distinguishing ability of the risk prediction model in T1–2 BC was acceptable regardless of whether it was used in either the internal or external validation cohort. Furthermore, the model had good specificity in predicting ALNM in T1 or HR−/HER2− BC patients, which means that SLNB may be omitted in patients who are classified as low risk according to this model based on the patient’s condition. In stage T2 patients, the model showed good sensitivity, suggesting that patients who are classified as high risk need to receive neoadjuvant therapy or accept ALND directly. Interestingly, although the model was designed to predict ALNM in T1–2 BC, we found that it could be used to predict patient survival, supporting the clinical and prognostic value of the model.
The expression of acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1) is associated with brain metastasis in BC25. CD1a molecule (CD1A) may predict regional lymph node invasion and prognosis in BC26. Deoxyuridine triphosphatase (DUT) is correlated with the treatment of BC27. FKBP prolyl isomerase 9 (FKBP9) has been shown to be related to distant metastasis in prostate cancer28. The frequency of FKBP9 mutation is relatively high in BC29. A previous study revealed that low expression of homeobox B3 (HOXB3) was associated with a poor prognosis in hormone receptor-negative BC30. Glycogen phosphorylase B (PYGB) has potential applications in the prevention of BC metastasis31. Signal recognition particle 14 (SRP14) plays a role in OS in acute myeloid leukemia patients32. The expression of 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′ phosphodiesterase (CNP) correlates with glioblastoma patient survival33. Opsin 3 (OPN3) promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma34. RALBP1-associated Eps domain-containing 1 (REPS1) may be involved in neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation35. The last gene, reticulon 1 (RTN1), is believed to be associated with prognosis and evolution in malignant glioma36. Furthermore, many genes in 57 candidate biomarkers, such as HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB7, COL3A1, COL5A2, KRT18 and KRT19, are closely related to tumorigenesis, metastasis and invasion of cancer37,35,36,37,38,39,43.
In this study, the odds ratios (ORs) of eight genes in the risk prediction model were more than 1, suggesting that the aforementioned genes, such as ACOX1 and DUT, facilitate lymph node metastasis in BC. In addition, we found that the high expression of ACOX1, CNP, DUT and OPN3 was associated with poor survival. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the above genes may serve as adverse prognostic indicators of survival by affecting ALNM in BC patients. Similarly, BC patients with high CD1A or REPS1 expression had longer survival times than those with low CD1A or REPS1 expression.
Previous studies have shown that M2 macrophages play protumor roles44 and that the infiltration of M2 macrophages is correlated with lymph node metastasis of BC45. A similar result was found in this study. We found that the risk of ALNM and the 11 genes in the risk prediction model were correlated with the infiltration of M2 macrophages by bioinformatics analysis, which indicates that the above genes may affect ALNM in BC by participating in tumor immune infiltration.
In summary, we innovatively constructed a risk prediction model that contains the T stage of the primary tumor and 11 genes in T1–2 BC, although we used different cohorts for internal and external verification. However, this was a retrospective study, and further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to demonstrate its potential clinical application value in the future.
Data availability
The data which used in this article are public data.
References
Siegel, R. L. et al. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 7–33 (2021).
Chang, C. C. et al. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters and textural features on (18)F-FDG PET/CT in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Sci. Rep. 9, 10946 (2019).
Krag, D. N. et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: Results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 8, 881–888 (2007).
Di Filippo, F. et al. Elaboration of a nomogram to predict non sentinel node status in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node, intra-operatively assessed with one step nucleic acid amplification method. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 34, 136 (2015).
Gradishar, W. J. et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Comp. Cancer Netw. 18, 452–478 (2020).
Schipper, R. J. et al. Axillary ultrasound for preoperative nodal staging in breast cancer patients: Is it of added value?. Breast 22, 1108–1113 (2013).
Majid, S., Tengrup, I. & Manjer, J. Clinical assessment of axillary lymph nodes and tumor size in breast cancer compared with histopathological examination: A population-based analysis of 2,537 women. World J. Surg. 37, 67–71 (2013).
Shien, T. et al. Evaluation of axillary status in patients with breast cancer using thin-section CT. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 314–319 (2008).
Shan, Y. N. et al. A nomogram combined radiomics and kinetic curve pattern as imaging biomarker for detecting metastatic axillary lymph node in invasive breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 10, 1463 (2020).
Gao, Y. et al. Nomogram based on radiomics analysis of primary breast cancer ultrasound images: Prediction of axillary lymph node tumor burden in patients. Eur. Radiol. 31, 928–937 (2021).
Xie, X. et al. Preoperative prediction nomogram based on primary tumor miRNAs signature and clinical-related features for axillary lymph node metastasis in early-stage invasive breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 142, 1901–1910 (2018).
Zhang, N. et al. The GPER1/SPOP axis mediates ubiquitination-dependent degradation of ERα to inhibit the growth of breast cancer induced by oestrogen. Cancer Lett. 498, 54–69 (2021).
Li, Y. et al. OSR1 phosphorylates the Smad2/3 linker region and induces TGF-β1 autocrine to promote EMT and metastasis in breast cancer. Oncogene 40, 68–84 (2021).
Lone, B. A. et al. SUPT5H post-transcriptional silencing modulates PIN1 expression, inhibits tumorigenicity, and induces apoptosis of human breast cancer cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 54, 928–946 (2020).
Min, Y. et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: Clinicopathologic features and survival outcome compared with ductal carcinoma in situ. J. Breast Cancer 16, 404–409 (2013).
Vickers, A. J. et al. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 8, 53 (2008).
Guo, H. et al. Prognostic values of a novel multi-mRNA signature for predicting relapse of cholangiocarcinoma. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 16, 869–881 (2020).
Györffy B.,et al. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast cancer research and treatment 123, 725–31 (2010).
Miao, Y. R. et al. ImmuCellAI: A unique method for comprehensive t-cell subsets abundance prediction and its application in cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Sci. 7, 1902880 (2020).
Newman A. M., et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles.Nature methods 12, 453–7 (2015).
Li T., et al. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic acids research 48, W509–w14 (2020).
Yuan, C. et al. Expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in primary breast tumours and metastatic axillary lymph nodes and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Sci. Rep. 9, 14356 (2019).
Suman, P., Mishra, S. & Chander, H. High formin binding protein 17 (FBP17) expression indicates poor differentiation and invasiveness of ductal carcinomas. Sci. Rep. 10, 11543 (2020).
Alba, A. C. et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: Users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA 318, 1377–1384 (2017).
Jung, Y. Y., Kim, H. M. & Koo, J. S. Expression of lipid metabolism-related proteins in metastatic breast cancer. PLoS ONE 10, e0137204 (2015).
La Rocca, G. et al. CD1a down-regulation in primary invasive ductal breast carcinoma may predict regional lymph node invasion and patient outcome. Histopathology 52, 203–212 (2008).
Miyakoshi, H. et al. 1,2,3-Triazole-containing uracil derivatives with excellent pharmacokinetics as a novel class of potent human deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 55, 6427–6437 (2012).
Jiang, F. N. et al. Increasing of FKBP9 can predict poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 216, 152732 (2020).
Chang, Y. S. et al. Pathway mutations in breast cancer using whole-exome sequencing. Oncol. Res. 28, 107–116 (2020).
Zhu, L. et al. Loss of HOXB3 correlates with the development of hormone receptor negative breast cancer. PeerJ 8, e10421 (2020).
Altemus, M. A. et al. Breast cancers utilize hypoxic glycogen stores via PYGB, the brain isoform of glycogen phosphorylase, to promote metastatic phenotypes. PLoS ONE 14, e0220973 (2019).
Shi, L., Huang, R. & Lai, Y. Identification and validation of signal recognition particle 14 as a prognostic biomarker predicting overall survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. BMC Med. Genomics 14, 127 (2021).
Zorniak, M. et al. Differential expression of 2′,3′-cyclic-nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase and neural lineage markers correlate with glioblastoma xenograft infiltration and patient survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 3628–3636 (2012).
Xu, C. et al. Expression of OPN3 in lung adenocarcinoma promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis. Thoracic Cancer 11, 286–294 (2020).
Drecourt, A. et al. Impaired transferrin receptor palmitoylation and recycling in neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 266–277 (2018).
Maimaiti, A. et al. Integrated gene expression and methylation analyses identify DLL3 as a biomarker for prognosis of malignant glioma. J. Mol. Neurosci. 71, 1622–1635 (2021).
Inamura, K. et al. HOXB2, an adverse prognostic indicator for stage I lung adenocarcinomas, promotes invasion by transcriptional regulation of metastasis-related genes in HOP-62 non-small cell lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 28, 2121–2127 (2008).
He, Q. et al. Homeobox B5 promotes metastasis and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma, via FGFR4 and CXCL1 upregulation. Theranostics 11, 5759–5777 (2021).
Huo, X. Y. et al. HOXB7 promotes proliferation and metastasis of glioma by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 25, 3146 (2021).
Srour, M. K. et al. Gene expression comparison between primary triple-negative breast cancer and paired axillary and sentinel lymph node metastasis. Breast J. 26, 904–910 (2020).
Ding, Y. L., Sun, S. F. & Zhao, G. L. COL5A2 as a potential clinical biomarker for gastric cancer and renal metastasis. Medicine 100, e24561 (2021).
Zhang, J., Hu, S. & Li, Y. KRT18 is correlated with the malignant status and acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer. Biosci. Rep. 39, 8 (2019).
Wang, X. et al. BRAF(V600E)-induced KRT19 expression in thyroid cancer promotes lymph node metastasis via EMT. Oncol. Lett. 18, 927–935 (2019).
Arole, V. et al. M2 tumor-associated macrophages play important role in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 188, 37–42 (2021).
Tashireva, L. A. et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity of macrophages and fibroblasts in breast cancer is associated with the morphological diversity of tumor cells and contributes to lymph node metastasis. Immunobiology 222, 631–640 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank TCGA ang GEO databases for providing clinical information and the RNA-Seq data of patients with breast cancer.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the natural science foundation of the Hunan Province of China (2020JJ4828) and the science and technology innovation Program of Hunan Province (2021SK2026).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design and conception: N.L., Y.W., Q.Y.Z., W.J.Y. Data analysis and interpretation: N.L., Y.W., D.J.O.Y., Q.T.C., L.Y.Z., Q.Y.Z., W.J.Y. Study oversight: Q.Y.Z., W.J.Y. Manuscript writing: all authors. Data visualizations: N.L., Y.W., J.F.J., W.J.Y. Revision: N.L., Y.W., J.F.J., W.J.Y. Manuscript approval: all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, N., Wen, Y., Zou, Q. et al. Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for clinical axillary lymph node metastasis in T1–2 breast cancer. Sci Rep 12, 687 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04495-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04495-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Characteristics and risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis of microinvasive breast cancer
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2024)
-
3D reconstruction based novel methods are more effective than traditional clinical assessment in breast cancer axillary lymph node metastasis prediction
Scientific Reports (2022)