Abstract
Experimental evidence suggests that ubiquitin-protein ligases regulate a number of cellular processes involved in tumorigenesis. We analysed the role of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HUWE1 for pathobiology of multiple myeloma (MM), a still incurable blood cancer. mRNA expression analysis indicates an increase in HUWE1 expression levels correlated with advanced stages of myeloma. Pharmacologic as well as RNAi-mediated HUWE1 inhibition caused anti-proliferative effects in MM cell lines in vitro and in an MM1.S xenotransplantation mouse model. Cell cycle analysis upon HUWE1 inhibition revealed decreased S phase cell fractions. Analyses of potential HUWE1-dependent molecular functions did not show involvement in MYC-dependent gene regulation. However, HUWE1 depleted MM cells displayed increased DNA tail length by comet assay, as well as changes in the levels of DNA damage response mediators such as pBRCA1, DNA-polymerase β, γH2AX and Mcl-1. Our finding that HUWE1 might thus be involved in endogenous DNA repair is further supported by strongly enhanced apoptotic effects of the DNA-damaging agent melphalan in HUWE1 depleted cells in vitro and in vivo. These data suggest that HUWE1 might contribute to tumour growth by endogenous repair of DNA, and could therefore potentially be exploitable in future treatment developments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The enzyme HECT, UBA And WWE Domain Containing E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase 1 (HUWE1) belongs to the Homologous to E6-AP Carboxyl Terminus (HECT) E3 ligases. HUWE1 catalyses both mono-ubiquitination and by using either K6, K11, K48 or K63 sites poly-ubiquitination of its substrates1. HUWE1 activity has been implicated in multiple cellular processes including, but not limited to, cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair2. Thus, HUWE1 is critical for maintaining adult stem cell dormancy in hematopoietic stem cells3. In addition, B cell-specific knockout of HUWE1 in mice demonstrated that interaction of HUWE1 with p53 is critical for both normal B cell development4 and the malignant growth of MYC-driven B cell cancers5. However, conflicting data regarding the impact of HUWE1 activity on MYC regulated genes and proliferation have been reported in colorectal cancer6,7.
Furthermore, HUWE1 function has also been implicated in the DNA damage response (DDR) ensuring genome integrity and comprising several different pathways specific for the respective type of DNA damage, e.g. oxidized or deaminated bases, bulky lesions such as DNA–protein adducts, or DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Thus, HUWE1 regulates the degradation of β and λ DNA polymerases, both of which are critical for genome stability and are involved in DDR8,9. In addition, H2A histone family member X (H2AX), a major DDR regulator upon DSBs, is degraded upon ubiquitination by HUWE110. Furthermore, HUWE1 has also been implicated in histone regulation11, and in the RNF8-dependent ubiquitylation response after UV- or IR-induced DSBs12.
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains a largely incurable B cell cancer requiring further efforts to better understand its pathobiology. Dependency on the ubiquitin–proteasome system is considered to be a hallmark of this disease affecting multiple critical cellular processes including cell cycle and apoptosis regulation, DNA damage repair or development of drug resistance13,14,15. Some of the most successful recent therapeutic approaches are targeting this system, e.g. proteasome inhibitors and cereblon-binding IMiDs. However, our current knowledge about E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases, a critical but complex component of the ubiquitin–proteasome system, and their potential role for MM pathobiology, is still limited.
Here, we ask whether HUWE1 might contribute to the malignant phenotype of MM, and investigate its role for malignant growth, MYC-dependent gene regulation and the DDR.
Results
HUWE1 expression increases during MM disease progression
First, we analysed HUWE1 expression in pre-malignant and malignant plasma cells (PCs) exploiting the publicly available GSE2113 mRNA data set16. Compared to pre-malignant PCs from patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), HUWE1 mRNA expression levels were significantly increased in bone marrow-derived MM cells, and still higher in leukemic MM cells (Fig. 1a). Additionally, a similar analysis using the GSE6477 dataset, which includes bone marrow-derived normal PCs and PCs from MGUS, Smoldering MM and newly diagnosed MM, also showed the same tendency (Supplementary Fig. 1a). These data indicate that HUWE1 expression is higher in advanced stages of MM. Western blot analysis confirmed HUWE1 expression in all human MM cell lines (HMCLs) tested (AMO-1, INA-6, JJN3, L-363, MM1.S, OPM-2, U266 and U266-MYC (Fig. 1b).
Antitumor effects of the pharmacologic HUWE1 inhibitor BI8622
BI8622 has previously been described as an inhibitor of HUWE1 activity7. In order to investigate whether malignant growth of MM cells might be affected by pharmacologic HUWE1 inhibition, we treated HMCLs (Fig. 2a), primary MM cells and normal mononuclear cells from peripheral blood (PBMCs; Fig. 2b) with 10 µM BI8622 for 48 h prior to viability analysis by MTT assay (HMCLs) or annexin V/PI staining and FACS measurement (primary MM cells and PBMCs). BI8622 treatment led to significantly lower viability in all HMCLs tested (Fig. 2a), a dose response curve for MM1.S and BI8622 is shown in supplementary Fig. 2b. Primary MM cells obtained from 14 different patients showed heterogeneous sensitivity towards BI8622 treatment, with a more sensitive subgroup (n = 8) distinguishable from a group of rather insensitive samples (n = 6) (Fig. 2b). There was no correlation between the response towards BI8622 and the clinical parameters from the patients (Supplementary Table 1). In contrast, treatment of PBMCs with BI8622 did not lead to substantial loss of viability (n = 5) (Fig. 2b). These results indicate that HUWE1 might support MM cell growth/survival in vitro. Unfortunately, however, the short serum half-life of BI8622 precludes its use in in vivo models.
Sustained inducible knockdown of HUWE1 strongly reduces proliferation of HCMLs in longer-term culture
We therefore decided to also analyse the role of HUWE1 in MM by molecular genetic approaches and generated sublines of JJN3, MM1.S, U266 and U266-MYC stably transfected with a doxycycline-inducible shRNA expression cassette targeting HUWE1. Western blot analysis revealed effective depletion of HUWE1 protein in all HMCL sublines 5 days after addition of doxycycline to the cell culture (Fig. 2c). Accordingly, real time qPCR analysis demonstrated about 80–90% decreases of HUWE1-mRNA levels (Fig. 2d). Over the 18-day study period HUWE1 knockdown strongly affected the growth curves of all MM cell lines tested, although to different degrees (Fig. 2e). Whereas HUWE1 knockdown in JJN3 cells resulted in a slight increase of their doubling time from 1.51/1.82 days (95% CI) to 1.80/2.13 days, the effect in MM1.S cells was a shift from 1.41/2.23 days to 13.06 days/infinity. Analysis of the live cell fraction in the treated cultures showed only in MM1.S a decrease of viable cells, whereas in JJN3, U266 and U266-MYC no decrease of viability could be detected (Fig. 2f and supplementary Fig. 4a). Doxycycline treatment of parental cells was without discernible effect over the same time frame (shown for MM1.S and U266 cells in Supplementary Fig. 1c). U266 cells, which lack endogenous MYC expression, were more sensitive to HUWE1 knockdown (1.90/2.20 days vs 3.38/4.17 days) than MYC overexpressing U266-MYC cells (1.37/2.37 vs 1.69/4.22 days). This relative resilience of the U266-MYC growth curve was intriguing as HUWE1 has previously been reported to activate MYC target gene expression via MIZ1 inhibition in colon cancer cell lines7. However, of our four inducible HUWE1 knockdown models only the MYC negative U266 cell line displayed slight HUWE1 dependence of mRNA levels of MYC-dependent genes (RPL29, RPL37; Supplementary Fig. 1b), and altered MIZ1 expression levels upon HUWE1 knockdown were not observed at all (supplementary Fig. 3a). We therefore conclude that the effects of HUWE1 depletion on MM cell growth are not primarily mediated via MYC and MIZ1. To further characterize the observed anti-proliferative effect upon HUWE1 knockdown, we used bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining for FACS-based cell cycle analysis. HUWE1 knockdown entailed a significant reduction of the S phase in all HMCLs tested (Fig. 2f,g; supplementary Fig. 4a). In MM1.S we detected a decrease of viable cells over the analysed period of 18 days and an increase of the sub-G1 fraction in the cell cycle analysis.
HUWE1 knockdown inhibits malignant MM growth in the MM1.S/NOD scid mouse model in vivo
Next, we asked whether HUWE1 might also support malignant growth of MM cells in vivo. For these experiments, MM1.S cells, stably transfected to express luciferase for bioimaging, and harbouring a doxycycline-inducible shRNA expression cassette targeting HUWE1, were injected into the tail veins of NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice (Fig. 3a). Prior to MM cell inoculation, the mice were divided into a control group which was fed a normal grain-based diet, and a test group which received a diet containing doxycycline (200 mg/kg). Notably, in the immediate time period following injection, when MM1.S cells migrate into the bone marrow, they still express HUWE1 because it takes about 3 to 4 days of exposure to doxycycline to implement full-scale HUWE1 knockdown (Fig. 2 and supplementary Fig. 2c). At day 7 post-inoculation the control group displayed significantly larger tumour mass than the HUWE1 knockdown group (22.14 × 109 ± 4.70 × 109 vs. 13.98 × 109 ± 5.61 × 109 photons/sec). This difference was further magnified at 14 days post injection, when the control group was at 119.38 × 109 ± 37.69 × 109 photons/sec and HUWE1 knockdown group at 70.92 × 109 ± 20.35 × 109 photons/sec (Fig. 3b). These data demonstrate that HUWE1 loss reduces tumour growth in vivo.
Loss of HUWE1 expression impairs DNA repair capacity
Based on its reported involvement in DDR regulation, we hypothesized that the observed effects of HUWE1 knockdown on cell cycle regulation and proliferation are functionally linked to its role in DDR2,17. First, we assessed the effects of HUWE1 depletion on ubiquitination of γH2AX which has been shown to be important for both DSB signalling and restarting of stalled replication forks10,17. After irradiation of MM1.S cells (10 Gy) both γH2AX and ubiquitinated γH2AX increased to slightly lesser extents in HUWE1 knockdown cells (Fig. 4a), but this still constituted functional DSB repair signalling. Similarly, HUWE1 knockdown did not affect the capacity for DNA repair after acute irradiation damage, as measured by the % DNA tail-length in a Comet assay over a 45-min time-window, in any HMCL tested (exemplarily shown for MM1.S cells; Fig. 4b). However, we also observed that the steady state level of ubiquitinated γH2AX was decreased in MM1.S cells in the absence of HUWE1 expression, whereas γH2AX was increased (Fig. 4a, lanes 1 and 3). Next, we therefore analysed the steady state levels of DNA tail-length in different HMCLs with or without prolonged HUWE1 knockdown and found significant increases in all HUWE1-depleted conditions, indicative for increased endogenous DNA damage (Fig. 4c). Finally, we analysed a number of regulatory factors known to interact with HUWE1 and to be associated with DDR (e.g. γH2AX, BRCA1, Mcl1, p53, DNA-Polymerase β8,9,10,17) by Western blotting of MM cells with and without HUWE1 depletion (Fig. 4d). Whereas a strong increase of γH2AX was found in MM1.S cells (the HMCL most sensitive for growth inhibition by HUWE1 knockdown), this effect was less pronounced in U266 and absent in JJN3 or U266-MYC cells. In contrast, phospho-BRCA1 levels decreased and Mcl-1 expression increased upon HUWE1 knockdown in all HMCLs analysed (Fig. 4d). In contrast to other reports, we found no consistent evidence that HUWE1 is involved in the degradation of H2AX, HDM2, p53 or p21 (supplementary Fig. 2c), or of PCNA, BRCA1 or DNA-Pol β (Fig. 4d). Indeed, in the HMCLs tested the levels of DNA-Pol β were slightly increased upon HUWE1 knockdown (Fig. 4d). Taken together, these data indicate that the endogenous DNA damage repair is—at least in functionally distinguishable parts—negatively affected by the absence of HUWE1.
HUWE1 knockdown strongly enhances growth-inhibitory effects of the DNA-damaging anti-MM agent melphalan in the MM1.S/NSG mouse model
Melphalan, an established chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of MM patients, damages DNA which, if not repaired, leads to induction of apoptosis in HMCLs (for review18). Therefore, we investigated if HUWE1 depletion may potentiate the anti-myeloma activity of melphalan. In the presence of 2.5 µm melphalan, knockdown of HUWE1 decreased proliferation of MM1.S cells in vitro from 69.41% ± 5.67 to 35.04% ± 1.24 compared to control as measured by MTT (Supplementary Fig. 4b). We then asked, if the increased melphalan sensitivity in vitro would also translate into an enhanced anti-tumour effect in vivo. Two groups of NSG mice (either with or without doxycycline-containing diet) were injected i.v. with luciferase expressing MM1.S cells endowed with an inducible expression cassette for shRNA targeting HUWE1 (Day 0), and the cells were allowed to migrate to the bone. Thereafter, starting at day 3 all mice were injected i.p. with 5 mg/kg melphalan (at days 3, 6 and 9), and bioluminescencent imaging was performed at days 3, 7 and 10 (Fig. 5a). Concomitant melphalan application and HUWE1 knockdown resulted in robust suppression of tumour growth (at day 7 post knockdown induction: 10.00 × 108 ± 1.12 × 108 photons/sec vs 38.09 × 108 ± 12.07 × 108 photons/sec in the melphalan-only control group; Fig. 5a,b). Moreover, this inhibition continued over 10 days (6.57 × 108 ± 2.02 × 108 photons/sec without HUWE1 and 20.81 × 108 ± 6.30 × 108 photons/sec with HUWE1) until the termination of the experiment due to animal health. These data support our finding that HUWE1 is involved in endogenous DNA damage repair which represents a salvage mechanism for DNA-damaged cells after treatment with alkylating agents like melphalan.
Discussion
Therapeutic intervention targeting molecular machineries that involve the ubiquitin proteasome system has been central to recent clinical advances in MM treatment and now forms the bedrock of current MM therapies15. However, many functional aspects of ubiquitination, in particular its role in tumorigenesis and as a potential therapeutic target remain to be better explored. Here we have investigated the HECT-E3 ligase HUWE1, which has been implicated in a number of oncogenic processes such as MYC regulation6,7 and DNA damage response (DDR)6,12,17, for its role in multiple myeloma. HUWE1 expression at either RNA- or protein level was detected in every MM cell line tested, which is in accordance with its pattern of ubiquitous expression in either normal or cancer tissue (www.protein-atlas.org/ENSG00000086758-HUWE1/pathology). Analysis of HUWE1 mRNA expression data from plasma cells also showed a moderate but still marked tendency for increase from the pre-malignant stages (normal PCs, MGUS) through intramedullary MM to plasma cell leukaemia suggesting a pathogenetic involvement of HUWE1 during MM progression to more aggressive forms. Inhibition of HUWE1 activity either by the pharmacologic compound BI8622 or by shRNA-mediated knockdown led to decreased growth and/or viability in MM cell lines as well as in a substantial fraction of primary MM samples, supporting a potential role of HUWE1 for malignant expansion. Both approaches varied somewhat in the extent of their effects and the pronounced decrease in viability across the board in MM cell lines after incubation with 10 µM BI8622 may in parts be due to different on-target effects to paralogs of HUWE1, e. g. HECTD4, or to off-target effects. However, the knockdown approach also demonstrated that HUWE1 depletion entails reduced proliferation rates, as shown by reduced S-phase components in cell cycle analyses. Accordingly, application of inducible HUWE1 knockdown in an MM1.S xenotransplantation model showed for the first time that blockade of HUWE1 expression is also effective at slowing tumour growth in vivo. Our data thus support findings in other cancer entities showing a role for HUWE1 for malignant growth5,6,7.
It was therefore surprising that neither in MM cell lines engineered for doxycycline-inducible HUWE1 knockdown nor in the MYC-overexpressing subline U266-MYC, moderate to strong HUWE1 depletion had any discernible effects on the expression levels of MYC target genes, nor on MIZ protein, an inhibitor of MYC activity. Unlike its role in colon cancer, our data thus do not imply HUWE1 as important regulator of MYC activity in MM. However, our results are compatible with recent in-depth analyses of the genetic mechanisms of MYC dysregulation in MM, which suggest that—unlike in other cancer entities—MYC expression is not correlated with proliferation but may rather support other physiological needs of plasma cell tumors 19.
Different authors have implicated HUWE1 function in the DNA damage response. Interestingly, although we found no impairment of the immediate response to irradiation-induced acute DNA damage in HUWE1 depleted MM cells, we show for the first time that prolonged HUWE1 knockdown always led to significant accumulation of damaged DNA as witnessed by Comet-assay, clearly indicating a role for HUWE1 in the response to endogenous DNA damage. Yet, only in MM1.S cells, this effect was translated into a notable increase in γH2AX levels. At this point, it remains unclear if absence of increased levels of γH2AX in HUWE1-depleted cells might be a result of general impairment of the detection of damaged DNA, or if only in MM1.S cells single strand breaks are converted to the double strand breaks that induce formation of γH2AX.
Amongst a host of potential DDR mediators analysed, increased levels of Mcl1 and DNA polymerase β and decreased levels of phospho-BRCA1 were the only changes consistently observed in HUWE1-depleted MM cells. Mcl1 has indeed recently been shown to be targeted for degradation by HUWE120, but a connection to impaired DDR has so far only been shown in the context of Mcl1 depletion21. In addition it has been reported that Mcl1 acts as a functional switch between NHEJ and HR DNA repair pathways22. Likewise, the functional relationship between HUWE1 and BRCA1 remains puzzling, because in contrast to breast cancer cells23, HUWE1 depletion did not affect levels of BRCA1 itself. Similar to the absence of increased γH2AX, though, the strong decrease of phosphorylated BRCA1 again implies defective detection of DNA damage or impaired initiation of DNA damage responses in HUWE1-depleted cells. Our suggestion is that the BRCA1 phosphorylation may be facilitated by a ubiquitin tag from HUWE1, but that this modification is not essential for DDR after IR exposure.
Recently, it was demonstrated that inhibition of nucleotide excision repair increases sensitivity of HMCLs to the DNA-alkylating anti-MM agent melphalan24. Because the observed antiproliferative effects of HUWE1 depletion in MM cells also appear to be mediated by impaired repair of endogenous DNA damage, it was rational to test melphalan effectivity within the context of HUWE1 knockdown. While this combination only produced a modest effect on viability in vitro, MM tumour growth in vivo continually decreased over the length of the study indicating that knockdown of HUWE1 sensitized the cells to melphalan-induced cell death. Genome-wide mutation analysis in newly diagnosed MM patients identified driver mutations in HUWE1. The majority of the reported mutations affect splice sites in the HUWE1 mRNA with the consequence of HUWE1 inactivation25. In light of our data, these would suggest, that MM patients with HUWE1 inactivation display a reduced DNA repair capacity. Therefore HUWE1 would act as a tumor suppressor assisting in DNA repair in MM cells which due to the high replicative stress display increased DNA damage26,27.
In summary, our data support a role for HUWE1 in the regulation or execution of endogenous and melphalan-induced DDR, and in this capacity may contribute to the malignant phenotype of MM. Pharmacological targeting of HUWE1 could be an attractive option to increase effectivity of MM therapies mechanistically related to induction of DNA damage.
Methods
Cell culture
The human MM cell lines (HMCLs) U266 and JJN3 were purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany), MM1.S was bought from LGC Biolabs (Wesel, Germany), and the stably c-MYC-expressing U266-MYC subline was established in our laboratory as previously described28. All HCMLs were cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), GlutaMAX, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 100 µg/ml gentamicin (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany).
Primary MM cells
Primary MM cells were obtained from routine diagnostic bone marrow aspirates of patients after informed consent with permission of the Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg (76/13). The primary MM cells were purified from the bone marrow aspirate by CD138 MicroBeads (Miltenyi) as previously described29. Primary MM cells were kept in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 2 mg/l glucose, 100 µg/ml gentamicin and with 2 ng/ml interleukin 630.
Cloning of inducible HUWE-1 shRNA and of firefly luciferase lentiviral vectors
pHAGE-dsRed-firefly luciferase was cloned by digesting pHAGE-CMV-DsRed-UBC-eGFP (addgene #24526) and replacing eGFP with PCR amplified firefly luciferase. Linearized pHAGE and fragments were ligated using Gibson Assembly Master Mix (NEB). pINDUCER11-shHUWE was cloned by inserting a published shRNA encoding sequence for HUWE1 into pINDUCER-117,31 using Gibson Assembly (NEB).
Lentivirus production and HMCL transduction
Lentivirus production and transduction of MM cell lines was performed as previously described28.
Western blot
Protein expression analysis was performed as previously described32. Cells were lysed in RIPA-buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, R0278) supplemented with proteinase inhibitor cocktail (AppliChem, A7779). Samples with 15 µg (or 30 µg for HUWE detection) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto Immobilon-P PVDF membranes (Millipore). Membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C in antibody solution with 1–5% BSA or 5% non-fat dry milk/TBS-T (20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20). Antibodies used in this study are listed in supplementary information.
Growth study
2 × 105 cells/ml were plated in 25 cm2 flasks containing 10 ml RPMI-1640 GlutaMAX with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 µg/ml gentamicin and 1 µg/ml doxycycline. Every 2–3 days cells were washed in PBS and cell numbers were determined by a trypan blue (Sigma-Aldrich, T8154) exclusion method using a haemocytometer and by FACS (CyFlow SL, Partec).
BrdU cell cycle analysis
Cells were treated with 10 µM BrdU (BioLegend) for 2 h. After washing twice with PBS, the cells were fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol for 30 min at 4 °C. The cells were resuspended in 1 ml freshly prepared 2 M HCl/0.5% Triton X-100/PBS and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. After washing twice with PBS, the cells were treated with 1 ml 0.1 M sodium tetraborate/0.5% Tween/PBS for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were washed with PBS and incubated in 100 µl antibody solution (0.4 µl APC-conjugated anti-BrdU antibody, BioLegend in PBS with 5% FBS) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing, the cells were treated with 50 µl RNase A (10 µg/ml) for 30–60 min. Finally, cells were stained with 3.3 µg/ml DAPI for 10 min. Flow cytometry was performed with a FACS Canto II (BD BioSciences) and data were analyzed by FlowJo V9.
MTT assay
Cell sensitivity to melphalan with and without HUWE1 depletion was measured using an MTT-based assay. Metabolic activity was quantified by adding 10 μl Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide (final concentration 0.5 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich). After 4 h 100 μl solubilization solution (10% SDS in 0.01 M HCl) was added and after overnight incubation at 37 °C absorbance of the solubilized reduced formazan was measured at 570 nm with a microtiter plate reader (Sunrise, Tecan).
Alkaline single-cell electrophoresis “Comet Assay”
Detection and quantification of DNA damage was assayed using the Comet Assay essentially as described33.
qPCR, real time PCR
RNA extraction was performed using the NucleoSpin RNA isolation kit (Macherey–Nagel). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each cDNA sample was pre-diluted 1:20 and 4 μl were used with 4 × Luminaris Color HiGreen qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 250 nM primer for the qPCR reaction. A two-step cycling protocol was performed as follows: UDG pre-treatment for 2 min (50 °C), initial denaturation for 10 min (95 °C), 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 40 s at 60 °C (CFX Connect Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad). The relative quantity of the target mRNA was normalized to beta-2-microglobulin). The fold changes in RNA expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method28. Primer sequences are listed in supplementary information.
Animal work
All experiments were performed with female NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1WjI/SzJ (NSG)-mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld) according to the German regulation for animal experimentation. 1 × 106 MM1.S-shHUWE1-firefly luciferase cells were washed, suspended in RPMI-1640 GlutaMAX medium and injected intravenously into NSG mice. Animals in the HUWEkd group received a doxycycline-supplemented diet (A112-D00203, ssniff, Soest). For the melphalan treatment animals were injected with 5 mg/kg melphalan (Sigma-Aldrich, M2011) on days 3, 7 and 10 after MM1.S cell transplantation. The growth of MM1.S cells was documented by bioluminescence imaging, IVIS Lumina system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Mice were anesthetized i.p. with a mixture of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine 2% (10 mg/ml) in 0.9% NaCl. 0.3 g/kg D-luciferin (BioSynth, L-8220) was coinjected. 10 min after injection bioluminescence was recorded. Data were analysed using Living Image software 4.4, Perkin Elmer.
Statistical analysis
A two-tailed Student’s t-test was applied to perform statistical analysis. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05. All experiments were performed as independent biological replicates at least three times. Calculations were performed with Prism GraphPad 8.0. All data are presented as mean ± SD.
Ethics declaration
All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and approved by the Regierung von Unterfranken AZ 55.2 2532-2-335.
Primary human MM cells were obtained from routine diagnostic bone marrow aspirates of patients after informed consent. All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg (AZ 76/13) and carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Michel, M. A., Swatek, K. N., Hospenthal, M. K. & Komander, D. Ubiquitin linkage-specific affimers reveal insights into K6-linked ubiquitin signaling. Mol. Cell 68, 233-246e235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.020 (2017).
Kao, S. H., Wu, H. T. & Wu, K. J. Ubiquitination by HUWE1 in tumorigenesis and beyond. J. Biomed. Sci. 25, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-018-0470-0 (2018).
King, B. et al. The ubiquitin ligase Huwe1 regulates the maintenance and lymphoid commitment of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1312–1321. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3559 (2016).
Hao, Z. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Mule acts through the ATM-p53 axis to maintain B lymphocyte homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 209, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20111363 (2012).
Qi, C. F. et al. Characterization of ARF-BP1/HUWE1 interactions with CTCF, MYC, ARF and p53 in MYC-driven B cell neoplasms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 6204–6219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13056204 (2012).
Myant, K. B. et al. HUWE1 is a critical colonic tumour suppressor gene that prevents MYC signalling, DNA damage accumulation and tumour initiation. EMBO Mol. Med. 9, 181–197. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201606684 (2017).
Peter, S. et al. Tumor cell-specific inhibition of MYC function using small molecule inhibitors of the HUWE1 ubiquitin ligase. EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 1525–1541. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201403927 (2014).
Markkanen, E. et al. Regulation of oxidative DNA damage repair by DNA polymerase lambda and MutYH by cross-talk of phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110449109 (2012).
Parsons, J. L. et al. Ubiquitin ligase ARF-BP1/Mule modulates base excision repair. EMBO J. 28, 3207–3215. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.243 (2009).
Atsumi, Y. et al. ATM and SIRT6/SNF2H mediate transient H2AX stabilization when DSBs form by blocking HUWE1 to allow efficient gammaH2AX foci formation. Cell Rep. 13, 2728–2740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.054 (2015).
Liu, Z., Oughtred, R. & Wing, S. S. Characterization of E3Histone, a novel testis ubiquitin protein ligase which ubiquitinates histones. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 2819–2831. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.7.2819-2831.2005 (2005).
Mandemaker, I. K. et al. DNA damage-induced histone H1 ubiquitylation is mediated by HUWE1 and stimulates the RNF8-RNF168 pathway. Sci. Rep. 7, 15353. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15194-y (2017).
Guerrero-Garcia, T. A. et al. The power of proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma. Expert Rev. Proteomics 15, 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2018.1543595 (2018).
Wang, X. et al. The proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor VLX1570 shows selectivity for ubiquitin-specific protease-14 and induces apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 26979. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26979 (2016).
Lub, S. et al. Novel strategies to target the ubiquitin proteasome system in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 7, 6521–6537. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6658 (2016).
Mattioli, M. et al. Gene expression profiling of plasma cell dyscrasias reveals molecular patterns associated with distinct IGH translocations in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 24, 2461–2473. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208447 (2005).
Choe, K. N. et al. HUWE1 interacts with PCNA to alleviate replication stress. EMBO Rep. 17, 874–886. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541685 (2016).
Fu, D., Calvo, J. A. & Samson, L. D. Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3185 (2012).
Misund, K. et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 34, 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0543-4 (2019).
Zhong, Q., Gao, W., Du, F. & Wang, X. Mule/ARF-BP1, a BH3-only E3 ubiquitin ligase, catalyzes the polyubiquitination of Mcl-1 and regulates apoptosis. Cell 121, 1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.009 (2005).
Mattoo, A. R. et al. MCL-1 depletion impairs DNA double-strand break repair and reinitiation of stalled DNA replication forks. Mol. Cell Biol. 37, e00535-e616. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00535-16 (2017).
Chen, G. et al. Targeting Mcl-1 enhances DNA replication stress sensitivity to cancer therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI92742 (2018).
Wang, X. et al. HUWE1 interacts with BRCA1 and promotes its degradation in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 444, 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.075 (2014).
Szalat, R. et al. Nucleotide excision repair is a potential therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 32, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.182 (2018).
Walker, B. A. et al. Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma. Blood 132, 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-03-840132 (2018).
Herrero, A. B. & Gutierrez, N. C. Targeting ongoing DNA damage in multiple myeloma: Effects of DNA damage response inhibitors on plasma cell survival. Front. Oncol. 7, 98. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00098 (2017).
Herrero, A. B., San Miguel, J. & Gutierrez, N. C. Deregulation of DNA double-strand break repair in multiple myeloma: Implications for genome stability. PLoS ONE 10, e0121581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121581 (2015).
Effenberger, M. et al. Glutaminase inhibition in multiple myeloma induces apoptosis via MYC degradation. Oncotarget 8, 85858–85867. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20691 (2017).
Chatterjee, M. et al. Combined disruption of both the MEK/ERK and the IL-6R/STAT3 pathways is required to induce apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells in the presence of bone marrow stromal cells. Blood 104, 3712–3721. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-04-1670 (2004).
Stuhmer, T. et al. Preclinical anti-myeloma activity of the novel HDAC-inhibitor JNJ-26481585. Br. J. Haematol. 149, 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08126.x (2010).
Meerbrey, K. L. et al. The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 108, 3665–3670. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019736108 (2011).
Bommert, K. S. et al. The feed-forward loop between YB-1 and MYC is essential for multiple myeloma cell survival. Leukemia 27, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.185 (2013).
Bankoglu, E. E. et al. Role of PTEN in oxidative stress and DNA damage in the liver of whole-body Pten haplodeficient mice. PLoS ONE 11, e0166956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166956 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) of Würzburg University (RB) and by the Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung (RB, KB). We would also like to thank E. Bankoglu and H. Stopper from the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Würzburg, for sharing the comet assay protocol, providing equipment and helpful discussion.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Wuerzburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.S.B. and K.B. designed experiments and contributed to writing the manuscript, V.K. performed and analysed the growth curves, comet assays and animal work, V.K. and J.K. and D.S. performed the WB and real time PCR experiments, M.C., T.S., and R.B. contributed to the writing, all authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kunz, V., Bommert, K.S., Kruk, J. et al. Targeting of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HUWE1 impairs DNA repair capacity and tumor growth in preclinical multiple myeloma models. Sci Rep 10, 18419 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75499-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75499-3
- Springer Nature Limited