Abstract
The release of rhizodeposits differs depending on the root position and is closely related to the assimilated carbon (C) supply. Therefore, quantifying the C partitioning over a short period may provide crucial information for clarifying root–soil carbon metabolism. A non-invasive method for visualising the translocation of recently assimilated C into the root system inside the rhizobox was established using 11CO2 labelling and the positron-emitting tracer imaging system. The spatial distribution of recent 11C-photoassimilates translocated and released in the root system and soil were visualised for white lupin (Lupinus albus) and soybean (Glycine max). The inputs of the recently assimilated C in the entire root that were released into the soil were approximately 0.3%–2.9% for white lupin within 90 min and 0.9%–2.3% for soybean within 65 min, with no significant differences between the two plant species; however, the recently assimilated C of lupin was released at high concentrations in specific areas (hotspots), whereas that of soybean was released uniformly in the soil. Our method enabled the quantification of the spatial C allocations in roots and soil, which may help to elucidate the relationship between C metabolism and nutrient cycling at specific locations of the root–soil system in response to environmental conditions over relatively short periods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The allocation of limited photoassimilates into the belowground plant parts is influenced by the various factors affecting the root–soil system, including root elongation, carbon (C) release, adaptation to the surrounding soil environment, and energy-requiring ion solubilisation and absorption1,2,3,4,5,6. Plant roots release a diverse variety of C compounds, termed rhizodeposits, into the rhizosphere, which extends several millimetres from the roots into the surrounding soil. It is estimated that approximately 3% of the assimilated C, corresponding to about 50% of the root biomass, is released by crops as rhizodeposits that remained in the soil7, including several organic compounds, border cells, and root exudates4,5,8. The release of organic substances occurs at a considerable cost to plants and, therefore, must be strictly regulated3,4. However, such regulatory mechanisms have not been fully elucidated owing to experimental technical difficulties.
In previous studies, various experimental approaches were developed to determine and estimate the C partitioning in plant roots and rhizosphere soil. Most of the commonly used approaches involve the destructive sampling of roots and rhizosphere soil. However, non-invasive approaches have also been developed to sample the soil solution near the roots5,9. These methods are useful for sampling the integrated amounts of released rhizodeposition sets at daily or weekly intervals during the plant growth period. However, the time lag between photosynthesis and soil CO2 efflux ranged from about a few hours to a few days, depending on the plant species (grasses or trees) and environmental conditions, including temperature10,11. A previous study proved that photoassimilates are translocated into the belowground plant parts very quickly and the rhizodeposits and root-derived CO2 from crops and grasses are detectable within the first few hours7. Additionally, photoassimilates are also very rapidly translocated into soybean roots (i.e., within 20 min)12,13. Therefore, C may also be quickly and continuously released14. The C allocation pattern in the belowground area of a rice paddy system was strongly dependent on the chase period and plant age, and the level of C markedly decreased in both roots and soil as plant growth proceeded15. Overall, some photoassimilates released as root exudates in the rhizosphere may exhibit pronounced short-term dynamics and have been suggested to be closely associated with root development. Thus, integrated and/or long-term sampling methods may not be the most appropriate for determining the detailed functions of the partitioning of such photoassimilates. A method that enables the quantitative analysis of short-term photoassimilate transport into the root and the surrounding soil with positional information is desirable for clarifying the C release capabilities at specific root positions.
Experimental systems based on pulse-labelling of 14C or 13C are commonly used to analyse photoassimilate allocation in the roots and rhizosphere7,14,15,16,17,18. In particular, imaging methods based on pulse-labelling of 14C have been applied to visualise the allocation of photoassimilates in the roots and surrounding area as rhizodeposits. For example, plant roots containing 14C-labelled photoassimilates translocated from the leaves to the roots as well as 14C-rhizodeposits released onto moistened filter paper have been visualised using autoradiography19,20,21,22,23. Additionally, soil-grown roots have been used to visualise C partitioning in the root and soil after several hours (or days) of 14CO2 pulse labelling18,24. However, a disadvantage of these experimental systems is that it is difficult to noninvasively visualise and quantify the distribution of C in root systems and the surrounding soil, because some of the rhizodeposits penetrate the soil surface by diffusion, and the beta-rays from 14C inside the root system and surrounding soil cannot penetrate the soil to be detected.
The positron-emitting tracer imaging system (PETIS) is an advanced imaging method for the quantitative analysis of radiotracer movements in intact plant bodies13,25,26,27. This method shares detection principles with positron emission tomography, which is mainly used in medical fields. The transport of 11C-labelled photoassimilates (11C-photoassimilates) from leaves to sink organs (e.g., roots and fruits) has been visualised previously using the PETIS13,27,28 or by positron emission tomography in combination with magnetic resonance imaging29,30 after pulse-feeding 11CO2 to plant leaves. In particular, the PETIS allows the visualisation of C translocation into the soil-grown root system because of the high energy of the gamma-rays (511 keV) from 11C that can permeate the soil13,28. Thus, it can be detected noninvasively. However, to the best of our knowledge, 11C-based imaging of photoassimilates in the surrounding soil coupled with the imaging of photoassimilate transport into the root system has not been reported. This may have been because of technical difficulties in distinguishing a small amount of 11C-photoassimilates in the surrounding soil from the much larger amounts of 11C-photoassimilates in the adjacent roots.
In this study, we hypothesised that the distributions of C transported to the whole root system through the phloem and released to the surrounding soil may differ depending on the positions of the root systems and the plant species. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a new method to visualise and evaluate the movement of 11C-photoassimilates into the root system and the release of 11C-photoassimilates into the soil coupled with positional information using the PETIS. The experiments allowed the characterisation of the different spatial C distributions in the rhizobox soil of white lupin (Lupinus albus) and soybean (Glycine max) plants.
Methods
Rhizobox design for imaging
To distinguish the 11C signals of the soil from that of roots, a rhizobox was specifically designed for the PETIS imaging experiments. The assembled rhizobox consisted of a square nylon 48-μm mesh (Clever Co. Ltd, Aichi, Japan) bag and a pair of soil boxes (Fig. 1a). Each soil box was 140-mm high × 110-mm wide × 14.5-mm deep. The soil box was filled with 170 g dry commercial garden soil (pH 5.7) consisting of red soil, compost, and fertiliser (0.48 mg g−1 nitrogen, 1.56 mg g−1 phosphorus, and 0.48 mg g−1 potassium) (Flower and Vegetable Soil; Tachikawa Heiwa Nouen Co. Ltd, Tochigi, Japan). The soil box was covered with a fitted nylon-mesh bag to confine the soil to the box. The nylon-mesh bag was created by sealing the nylon mesh using an electrothermal sealer (HAKKO Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Numerous 5-mm-diameter holes in the base of the soil box allowed water absorption.
Plant materials
The test plants were placed in a growth chamber maintained at 12 hours light (26 °C):12 hours dark (20 °C), with a photon flux density of 650 µmol m−2 s−1 at the tops of plants and 65% relative humidity for the entire cultivation period.
Seeds of white lupin (Lupinus albus L. ‘Energy’) were sterilised with 70% ethanol for 5 min and then thoroughly washed with deionised water. The seeds were sown on a vermiculite bed and then incubated in a growth chamber at 26 °C in the dark. One week after sowing, the seedlings were transferred to plastic containers holding 6 l of the following nutrient solution: 115.03 mg l−1 NH4H2PO4, 53.49 mg l−1 NH4Cl, 109 mg l−1 K2SO4, 0.935 mg l−1 KCl, 294.0 mg l−1 Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 123 mg l−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 0.367 mg l−1 H3BO4, 0.302 mg l−1 MnSO4·5H2O, 0.004 mg l−1 (NH4)6Mo7O24, 0.081 mg l−1 ZnSO4, 0.032 mg l−1 CuSO4·5H2O, 0.051 mg l−1 CoSO4·7H2O, 0.004 mg l−1 NiSO4·6H2O, 18.6 mg l−1 ethylenediamine-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate, and 13.9 mg l−1 FeSO4·7H2O at pH 5.2. The nutrient solution was renewed every 4 days during the 10 days hydroponic cultivation period.
Seeds of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Jack’] were sterilised with 70% ethanol for 30 s and with 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 20 min, and then thoroughly washed with deionised water. To reproduce the normal soybean roots grown in the field, the seeds were inoculated with a suspension of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens strain USDA110 for 2 hours, sown on a vermiculite bed, and then incubated in a growth chamber at 26 °C under dark conditions. One week after sowing, the seedlings were transferred to plastic containers holding 6 l of the nutrient solution31. The nutrient solution was renewed every 7 days during the 18 days hydroponic cultivation period.
After hydroponic cultivation, each root system of the white lupin and soybean plants was placed into a square nylon-mesh bag and sandwiched between two soil boxes. The plants were grown for another 10 days in the same growth chamber with the same conditions. The root systems could absorb water and nutrients from the soil through the mesh. The root system was easily removed from the two soil boxes without disturbing the soil surface (Fig. 1b). Water was initially added from the top of the rhizobox to produce a depth of approximately 3 cm in the watering tray every three days. Then the water was supplied through the holes at the bottom of the rhizobox. The holes were covered with nylon mesh to prevent lessivage.
PETIS imaging experiment
11CO2 tracer gas
The 11CO2 was produced by the reaction of 14N(p,α)11C caused by bombarding pure nitrogen gas with 10 MeV protons from an azimuthally varying field cyclotron located at the Takasaki Ion Accelerators for Advanced Radiation Application, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (Gunma, Japan)28. The irradiated gas that contained the nitrogen gas and 11CO2 was passed through a stainless-steel pipe cooled with liquid nitrogen. Only the 11CO2 gas was collected as dry ice in the stainless-steel pipe; its radioactivity was measured with a curimeter (IGC-3, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). The resultant 190–450 MBq of the 11CO2 (corresponding to approximately 0.56–1.32 pmol) was transferred to the gas conditioning system for the PETIS imaging experiment.
PETIS measurement
The PETIS was installed in the growth chamber during the imaging experiment (Fig. 2a). The PETIS apparatus, a modified PPIS-4800 (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan), had a field of view (FOV) that was 119.9-mm wide and 187.0-mm high, with a spatial resolution of 1.6–2.1 mm for the entire FOV32.
The rhizobox area of each test plant (four lupin and four soybean plants) was positioned just inside the FOV at the focal plane between two opposing PETIS detector heads. The photon flux density was maintained at 1,000 µmol m−2 s−1 throughout the imaging experiments. The leaves of the test plant were covered by a gas-tight feeding chamber to supply the 11CO2 tracer gas. The collected 11CO2 was extruded by a pump and mixed with ambient air (containing approximately 450 ppm CO2) supplied in one direction from the inlet to the outlet of the feeding chamber. The mixed tracer gas was supplied at a constant rate of 100 ml min−1, and the PETIS was immediately started to obtain images (Fig. 2b, Step 1). The 11CO2 was passed through the feeding chamber within 1 min and the residual 11CO2 that was not fixed by leaves was completely collected by soda lime (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) connected to the outlet of the feeding chamber. The movement of 11C-photoassimilates to the root system was monitored in real-time. When the 11C signal reached the root tips, at 70–90 min for white lupin and 65 min for soybean after the 11CO2 feeding, the whole plant with intact roots was quickly removed from the rhizobox (Fig. 2b, Step 2). Then, the rhizobox was reassembled, and the PETIS imaging resumed to visualise the released 11C present in the rhizobox soil without plant roots. The imaging continued for 20 min (Fig. 2b, Step 3). Images were acquired every 10 s.
An additional PETIS experiment was conducted to analyse the kinetics of 11C-photoassimilates translocated into the root and 11C-labelled organic substances released by the root into a hydroponic nutrient solution in a 35 days old soybean plant (Fig. S3a). After the 11CO2 feeding, the nutrient solution was continuously circulated by a pump (UPS-112E, NITTO KOHKI CO., LTD., Tokyo, Japan) at 13 ml min−1 through an InertSep Active Carbon column cartridge (GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to collect the released 11C-organic substances. Time-course analyses of 11C-labelled photoassimilates in the roots and cartridge were generated from the PETIS imaging data (Fig. S3b).
The prepared PETIS images were corrected for the sensitivity distribution and the counting efficiency of the gamma-rays on the detectors by using a standard radiation source, and for 11C radioactive decay (T1/2 = 1,223.1 s)29. In this way, we ensured that the PETIS images were quantitative with respect to the 11C radioactivity.
Analyses of the PETIS data
Serial images of the 11C-photoassimilates moving through the root system and the released 11C in the rhizobox soil were obtained (Figs. 3a,b and S1). The original PETIS image data were acquired as counts of gamma-rays at 10 s per frame. The counts of every six frames of image data were averaged and integrated to yield data at 60 s per frame for the root system. The same method was used to obtain data at 5 min per frame from every 30 frames of the original image data for released 11C into the soil. The PETIS imaging data were prepared using ImageJ ver. 1.51J8 software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). To align the image data intensity, all imaging data were normalized to the total arrived 11C radioactivity in the entire underground part of the rhizobox area within the root imaging period, i.e., including the 11C radioactivity of the roots and soil (Figs. 3 and S1). The value of total arrived 11C radioactivity was calculated from the average 11C radioactivity in a region of interest (ROI) set on the rhizobox area during the last 5 min of the root imaging period for each of the eight plants (four lupin and four soybean plants). Therefore, the colour scale of the imaging data of Figs. 3 and S1, the z-axis of Figs. 4 and S2, and the values in Fig. 5 indicate the relative 11C radioactivity levels.
On the basis of the PETIS imaging data and the superimposition onto the pictures taken after the imaging experiment, some ROIs were selected in the imaging data of both the root and rhizobox soil (Figs. 4 and S2). The ROIs were set by enclosing the high signal intensity regions selected in visual with different sized circles as the hotspot for the soil and for the corresponding positions on the roots in lupin (Figs. 4a and S2a). Two representative square ROIs were set on the high signal intensity regions of both sides of the soil and roots in soybean (Figs. 4b and S2b). The imaging data for the soil was used to generate a 3-D surface plot to indicate the relative 11C radioactivity levels (z-axis). Because the ROIs did not have the same area, to align and compare the image intensity for the different ROIs, the relative 11C radioactivity per unit area (mm2) of each ROI was calculated.
A total of 120 (11-mm × 11-mm) squares for the four lupin plants and 108 (11-mm × 11-mm) squares for the four soybean plants were defined as ROIs in the root system and the corresponding rhizobox soil imaging data (top of Fig. 5a,b). The relative 11C radioactivity of the ROIs was used to generate independent scatter plots between the relative 11C radioactivity for the root (x-axis) and the soil (y-axis) for each white lupin and soybean plant (Fig. 5a,b). The x-axis values were calculated from the average of the relative 11C radioactivity levels in each ROI during the last 5 min of the root imaging period using the root imaging data in Figs. 3 and S1. Thus, the x-axis value indicates the arrived relative 11C radioactivity in the underground parts inside the rhizobox within the root imaging period (Fig. 2b, Step 1), i.e., including the 11C activity of the roots and soil. The corresponding y-axis values were calculated from the average of the relative 11C radioactivity levels in each ROI during the first 5 min using the soil imaging data in Figs. 3 and S1. The hotspot blocks (red circles) for white lupin included the entire hotspot area presented in Figs. 4a and S2a, but the other blocks did not (white circles). The correlation between the relative 11C radioactivity of the root and soil was determined for the hotspot blocks and for the other blocks, after which the coefficient of determination (R2) values were calculated (Fig. 5a). All the square-blocks of the soybean roots and soil were used for analysing correlations and calculating R2 (Fig. 5b). To compare the C release capabilities of the whole root system between the two test species, the proportions of 11C released from the whole root system to the soil, as the average release rates (%) in the rhizobox areas, were calculated. The average value of the last 5 min of the root imaging period was used to calculate the 11C radioactivity of the entire underground part (roots plus soil) and it was defined as the 11C radioactivity arrived in whole root system because the 11C of soil was released from the root system. The average value of the first 5 min of the soil imaging period was used for the released 11C radioactivity levels in the soil. Subsequently, the ratio of the 11C radioactivity level of the soil to that of the root was calculated for each test plant (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).
Results
Distribution of 11C-photoassimilates in the root system and soil
Several images of 11C-photoassimilates partitioning in the root system and the rhizobox soil are shown in Figs. 3 and S1. The 11C-photoassimilates translocated from the leaves reached the root base within 20 min after the 11CO2 feeding and were then gradually delivered to the whole root system in white lupin and soybean plants. The 11C-photoassimilates passed almost uniformly through the primary root and then were gradually translocated throughout the entire root system, including the root tips, within 70–90 min in white lupin and 65 min in soybean. In white lupin, the shape of the 11C signal in the final images of the root system did not reflect the relatively uniform distribution of the root system. Distinct hotspots of radioactivity occurred in some parts of the root system. An analysis of the distribution of released 11C from white lupin into the soil revealed a hotspot with a locally high 11C-activity level (Figs. 3a and S1a). In contrast to white lupin, the soybean plants showed almost uniform and coincident distributions of 11C in the soil and root system architecture in the final image. The distribution of released 11C from soybean in the rhizobox area was comparatively uniform (Figs. 3b and S1b).
Carbon input into the soil
The densities of 11C released from the root differed between white lupin and soybean (Fig. 4). The density of released 11C from white lupin was highest in ROI 2, followed by ROI 3, ROI 4, ROI 6, ROI 5, and ROI 1, representing the six hotspots in the rhizobox soil in this case (Fig. 4a). The average density of released relative 11C radioactivity in the rhizobox area (mm2) was approximately 2.0 Bq MBq−1 mm−2 in 80 min. The density of the released relative 11C radioactivity per hotspot area (mm2) was approximately 10.0–24.2 Bq MBq−1 mm−2 in the six ROIs of the hotspots. Therefore, the release density in the hotspots was greater than the average of the rhizobox area by approximately 5–12 times. In contrast to white lupin, the released 11C from soybean was almost uniformly distributed in the rhizobox area that was in contact with roots (Fig. 4b). The density of released relative 11C radioactivity was approximately 1.5 Bq MBq−1 mm−2 in the rhizobox area, and the highest values on both sides of the rhizobox area were approximately 2.9 and 2.6 Bq MBq−1 mm−2. In four test plants each of white lupin and soybean, the density of released 11C in the rhizobox areas ranged from 0.2 to 2.0 Bq MBq−1 mm−2 and 0.7 to 1.6 Bq MBq−1 mm−2, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two species. However, compared with soybean, white lupin released 11C in particular areas to form several hotspots, with different values (ranged from 1.0 to 24.2 Bq MBq−1 mm−2) in different plants (Figs. 4 and S2).
Independent scatter plots between the 11C radioactivity of the root and soil for four test plants of white lupin and soybean were prepared (Fig. 5). Each plot represents a square ROI block set in a position corresponding to the relationship between the root system and the soil. The red circles in the white lupin indicate the hotspot blocks that were selected to include the entire hotspot ROIs presented in Figs. 4a and S2a. For both test plant species, the values of the released relative 11C radioactivity in the soil (y-axis) tended to increase in proportion to the increasing values of the 11C radioactivity arrived in the root (x-axis). The correlation between the relative 11C radioactivity in the soil and the root plus soil was moderate, with R2 = 0.519–0.592 (p < 0.0001) for soybean and R2 = 0.515–0.677 (p < 0.0001) for white lupin, except for the hotspot blocks. In the hotspot blocks, the relative 11C radioactivity value of the soil was not necessarily proportional to the increase in the value in the root. The correlation of the hotspot blocks was lower than that of the other blocks (R2 = 0.005–0.695, p < 0.0001 for one plant and p = 0.0426–0.8419 for three plants) for white lupin. In the rhizobox area, the arrived 11C radioactivity of the entire underground part was 11–33 and 7–47 MBq for lupin and soybean plants, respectively. In the corresponding soil, the released 11C radioactivity was 74–827 and 111–1020 kBq for lupin and soybean plants, respectively (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The proportions of released 11C from the root to the soil were approximately 0.3%–2.9% for white lupin and 0.9%–2.3% for soybean (Supplementary Table 2). In soybean plants, the value of released 11C in each ROI was generally up to twice the average proportion of released 11C from the whole root; however, white lupin released a considerable proportion of its 11C in hotspot block areas (red circles), and its maximum value was approximately 4.7 times the average proportion of 11C released from the other block areas (white circles). In comparison with the released proportion, the maximum 11C activity level in hotspot areas was 23.1 times greater than the average 11C activity level of the other areas.
Discussion
In previous studies, various types of rhizoboxes were developed to analyse C allocation and its components in soil-grown plants5,9,16,33,34,35. One of the reasons for investigation of C allocation in belowground being difficult is that it is not easy to separate the root and surrounding soil noninvasively; therefore, the amounts of 14C- or 13C-assimilates allocated to the roots and surrounding soil could not be differentiated. Our rhizobox system allows rapid separation of the soil and roots without destroying the soil surface. Therefore, the rhizobox system allowed the imaging of a small amount of 11C released into the rhizobox soil (Figs. 1 and 2). Compared to other growing conditions (e.g., big rhizoboxes or natural conditions), the small, two-dimensional design of the rhizobox causes the roots to be restricted to a narrow space, which may have limited the C allocation rate into the belowground area. This potential drawback may suggest that the method requires improvement; notwithstanding, the rhizobox can yield a simple form of root system that can be easily observed, and includes the advantage that the method enables quantitative analysis of the spatial distribution of 11C-photoassimilates in the root system inside the rhizobox for an intact, living plant (Fig. 3). In contrast to 14C-tracers, 11C is suitable for the direct visualisation of roots in soil because the energy of the positron annihilation gamma-rays from 11C is high (511 keV); therefore, more than 99% of the gamma-rays can permeate the rhizobox (including the plant body and 14.5 mm of the soil box) into each PETIS detector, unlike the beta-rays from 14C. To the best of our knowledge, the present method is the first experimental system to successfully visualise and quantify the released C in different root positions of soil-grown living plants. This feature permits the positions of the roots and the surrounding soil to be aligned, enabling the sampling of the soil based on ROIs after the PETIS imaging.
In previous studies, fixed 14C was translocated from the leaves to the roots within 1 hour, and the exudation from the roots increased to a maximum after 2–3 hours of fixation in wheat14. In soybean plants, the photoassimilates were transported from leaves to the root base within 20 or 30 min after fixation, and the distribution of 11C-photoassimilates in the soil-grown root system was visualised12,13,28. The present results were consistent with those of previous studies, but they also indicated that photoassimilates translocation for 65–90 min is sufficient for the release and visualisation of the released C in the soil for white lupin and soybean plants. However, there is some difficulty in assessing the C allocation pattern of the underground part during the entirety of plant growth because the half-life of 11C is short, meaning that the PETIS imaging must be carried out over a short period of time. Zang et al. (2019) reported that the plant age and the chase period strongly affected C allocation patterns. The C allocated belowground (roots and soil) strongly decreased with plant age, but markedly increased within the first 10 days of the chase period after 14C or 13C labelling in the rice–soil system. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the three tracers (11C, 14C, and 13C) to cover C allocation over both the short and long term to correctly evaluate C allocation patterns as well as the spatial C distribution in roots and soil. Thus, the large variability of the C release proportions among the individual plants (Supplementary Table 2) may have been affected by interactions of these complex factors, such as plant age and the chase period of imaging.
The signals of the 11C-photoassimilates translocated into the root system (Figs. 3 and S1) included the signals of the released 11C-photoassimilates in the rhizobox soil before the removal of the root system from the rhizobox. However, because the signals of the released 11C were much weaker (less than 3%) than the signals of the 11C-photoassimilates in roots, it was necessary to separate the signals derived from the plant root from those derived from the released substances in the soil. The recently assimilated C from leaves arrived at the root base approximately 14 min after the tracer feeding in the plant shown in Fig. S3, which was similar to the timing presented in Fig. 3. The release of organic substances into the nutrient solution was first detected approximately 35 min after tracer feeding into the bathing solution using a trap column cartridge filled with active carbon (Fig. S3b right). Therefore, the released 11C-photoassimilates may be secreted as organic substances into the surrounding areas approximately 20 min after the photoassimilates are translocated into the root system. Moreover, the 11C signal from the root system to the soil included the 11C released from 40 to 65–90 min after the tracer feeding (Figs. 3 and S1).
The distribution of the released 11C in the rhizobox soil may conceivably include the 11C-rhizodeposits and 11CO2 that originated from root and rhizomicrobial respiration. However, the 11CO2 produced by respiration was able to dissolve in soil water or diffuse through the nylon mesh into the soil. Thus, the 11C signal in the soil may include the 11C activity due to respiration. Helal and Sauerbeck (1991) reported that in bean plants, rhizosphere respiration is consumed as 20% of the total assimilated C, and the rhizomicrobial and root respiration contributes 76%–84% and 16%–24% of the total rhizosphere respiration, respectively. In other recent studies on crops and grasses, about 10% and 16% of the assimilated C was allocated to the roots, with about 8% and 12% of the assimilated C lost as root respiration and about 3% and 5% of the assimilated C lost as rhizodeposits, respectively7. Therefore, a large amount of 11CO2 derived from root respiration, representing more than double the total amount of rhizodeposits, could be contained in the image data of the soil area. However, these previous studies estimated respiration based on the total root system or soil over long periods (more than a few hours). In the current study focusing on hotspots and the local areas over a short period, the amount of released 11C was 5–12 times higher in hotspots than in other areas (Fig. 4). Additionally, the respiration rate can vary by up to 2 times among the various positions of cluster roots and other root types in white lupin36. These findings may suggest that at least in the hotspots of white lupin, the 11C signal in the soil is mostly derived from the 11C-rhizodeposits released from the local roots. However, because of technical difficulties in separating the 11CO2 from the soil in our method, our results may need to be validated by new methods in future work. The soil imaging data of soybean were relatively uniform and did not reflect the clear shape of the soybean root system, which may be the result of the following: 1) the signal of the released 11C in the soil was too weak and the background noise was amplified; 2) the adjacent roots were intertwined with each other in the nylon-mesh bag, resulting in a mixture of released 11C from different roots; and 3) the released 11C from the roots was diffused in the water between the roots and the soil. Owing to these factors, the resolution of the released 11C imaging data decreased to approximately a few centimetres. One of the limitations of our method is that the resolution of the rhizodeposition imaging data is lower than that of phosphor imaging. Therefore, it may not be suitable for analysing a single root. However, a high released 11C signal was detected in white lupin, revealing a definite hotspot in the local soil area. Thus, the above-mentioned problems may be addressed by improving the high signal to noise ratio.
White lupin forms a structure called cluster roots in which lateral roots are densely packed. They secrete large amounts of organic acids and enzymes into the surrounding soil over a short period and intensively take up nutrients, including phosphorus and iron. The amount of root exudation varies by several fold depending on the changing surrounding environment and relationship with the root system’s growth stage at specific positions1,2,6. Li et al. (2010) reported that the concentration of citrate, a major fraction of released carboxylates, in the surrounding soil of white lupin cluster roots changed from 1.4 to 11.4 µmol g−1 dry soil under different soil conditions. In the present study, the released 11C distribution from white lupin showed a hotspot, with a very high localised 11C concentration, and the presence of cluster roots was confirmed. However, the other cluster roots did not release large amounts of 11C to form hotspots. This may have been because of the differences in the cluster root growth stages and/or soil environmental conditions. In contrast to white lupin, soybean does not form cluster roots, resulting in a uniform distribution of released 11C. However, the arrival times of 11C-photoassimilates into roots and the proportions of released 11C for the entire root systems were not significantly different between white lupin and soybean. The present method allowed us to determine the spatial C distribution in both the root system and soil and to better identify characteristic locations, like hotspots, in the rhizobox soil. Thus, from a physiological point of view, the PETIS imaging method can provide novel scientific information. Our results visually clarified for the first time that white lupin and soybean plants have different strategies for the release of 11C into the soil. These findings indicate that our method is sufficiently able to characterise the diversity in the release of recently assimilated 11C into the surrounding soil from different portions of the root system.
In conclusion, we developed and demonstrated the utility of a novel method for the visualisation and evaluation of the 11C-photoassimilate distributions in the root system and the rhizobox soil using white lupin and soybean as test plants. The results suggest that the ratio of photoassimilate allocation in the root and the released 11C in the surrounding soil differs spatially in the root system and that the C allocation process varies depending on the plant species. Our method demonstrates the possibility of the non-destructive sampling of roots and surrounding soil at specific positions in the root system based on the PETIS imaging data. It also allows for analyses of the chemical and biological characteristics of the surrounding soil without radionuclides after the PETIS imaging because the half-life of 11C (20.39 min) is short. The released C compounds have important effects on microbial populations and nutrient solubility and availability, while also enhancing the plant’s ability to cope with adverse soil–chemical conditions1,2,37,38. Therefore, the method will be useful for future investigations of the mechanisms involved in, and the control of, plant secretory systems, the effects of the released C on abiotic and/or biotic factors, and the ecological functions of plant–rhizosphere microbial community interactions.
References
Li, H.-G., Shen, J.-B. & Zhang, F.-S. & Lambers, H. Localized application of soil organic matter shifts distribution of cluster roots of white lupin in the soil profile due to localized release of phosphorus. Annals of Botany 105, 585–593, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq012 (2010).
Neumann, G. et al. Physiological Aspects of Cluster Root Function and Development in Phosphorus-deficient White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Annals of Botany 85, 909–919, https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1135 (2000).
Farrar, J., Hawes, M., Jones, D. & Lindow, S. How roots control the flux of carbon to the rhizosphere. Ecology 84, 827–837, https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0827:HRCTFO]2.0.CO;2 (2003).
Jones, D. L., Nguyen, C. & Finlay, R. D. Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant and Soil 321, 5–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0 (2009).
Oburger, E. et al. Evaluation of a novel tool for sampling root exudates from soil-grown plants compared to conventional techniques. Environmental and Experimental Botany 87, 235–247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.11.007 (2013).
Dinkelaker, B., RÖMheld, V. & Marschner, H. Citric acid excretion and precipitation of calcium citrate in the rhizosphere of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant, Cell &. Environment 12, 285–292, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01942.x (1989).
Pausch, J. & Kuzyakov, Y. Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale. Global Change Biology 24, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13850 (2018).
Lynch, J. M. & Whipps, J. M. Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 129, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011685 (1990).
Wenzel, W. W., Wieshammer, G., Fitz, W. J. & Puschenreiter, M. Novel rhizobox design to assess rhizosphere characteristics at high spatial resolution. Plant and Soil 237, 37–45, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013395122730 (2001).
Kuzyakov, Y. & Gavrichkova, O. REVIEW: Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls. Global Change Biology 16, 3386–3406, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02179.x (2010).
Kayler, Z., Keitel, C., Jansen, K. & Gessler, A. Experimental evidence of two mechanisms coupling leaf-level C assimilation to rhizosphere CO2 release. Environmental and Experimental Botany 135, 21–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.12.002 (2017).
Ito, S. et al. Real-time analysis of translocaion of phtosynthates to nodules in soybean plants using 11CO2 with a positron-emitting tracer imaging system (PETIS). Radioisotops 59, 145–154, https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.59.145 (In Japanese with English abstract and figure legends) (2010).
Kawachi, N. et al. Real-time whole-plant imaging of 11C translocation using positron-emitting tracer imaging system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 648, S317–S320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.10.152 (2011).
Dilkes, N. B., Jones, D. L. & Farrar, J. Temporal Dynamics of Carbon Partitioning and Rhizodeposition in Wheat. Plant Physiology 134, 706–715, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.032045 (2004).
Zang, H. et al. Allocation of assimilated carbon in paddies depending on rice age, chase period and N fertilization: Experiment with 13CO2 labelling and literature synthesis. Plant and Soil 445, 113–123, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-03995-1 (2019).
Pausch, J., Tian, J., Riederer, M. & Kuzyakov, Y. Estimation of rhizodeposition at field scale: upscaling of a 14C labeling study. Plant and Soil 364, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1363-8 (2013).
Sauer, D., Kuzyakov, Y. & Stahr, K. Spatial distribution of root exudates of five plant species as assessed by 14C labeling. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 169, 360–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200621974 (2006).
Pausch, J. & Kuzyakov, Y. Photoassimilate allocation and dynamics of hotspots in roots visualized by 14C phosphor imaging. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 174, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900271 (2011).
Dennis, P. G., Miller, A. J. & Hirsch, P. R. Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities? FEMS Microbiology Ecology 72, 313–327, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00860.x (2010).
Holz, M., Zarebanadkouki, M., Kuzyakov, Y., Pausch, J. & Carminati, A. Root hairs increase rhizosphere extension and carbon input to soil. Annals of Botany 121, 61–69, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx127 (2018).
Dennis, P. & Jones, D. 14C pulse labelling and allocation imaging. Handbook of methods used in rhizosphere research. Vol. 631 336–337 (Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 2006).
Kuzyakov, Y. & Domanski, G. Model for rhizodeposition and CO2 efflux from planted soil and its validation by 14C pulse labelling of ryegrass. Plant and Soil 239, 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014939120651 (2002).
McDougall, B. M. & Rovira, A. D. Sites of exudation of 14C-labelled compounds from wheat roots. New Phytologist 69, 999–1003, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1970.tb02479.x (1970).
Norton, J. M., Smith, J. L. & Firestone, M. K. Carbon flow in the rhizosphere of ponderosa pine seedlings. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 22, 449–455, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90177-2 (1990).
Fujimaki, S. et al. Tracing cadmium from culture to spikelet: noninvasive imaging and quantitative characterization of absorption, transport, and accumulation of cadmium in an intact rice plant. Plant Physiology 152, 1796–1806, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.151035 (2010).
Suzui, N., Yin, Y.-G., Ishii, S., Sekimoto, H. & Kawachi, N. Visualization of zinc dynamics in intact plants using positron imaging of commercially available 65Zn. Plant Methods 13, 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0188-0 (2017).
Hidaka, K. et al. Dynamic Analysis of Photosynthate Translocation into strawberry fruits using non-invasive 11C-labeling supported with conventional destructive measurements using 13C-labeling. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01946 (2019).
Yamazaki, H. et al. Live-imaging evaluation of the efficacy of elevated CO2 concentration in a closed cultivation system for the improvement of bioproduction in tomato fruits. Plant Biotechnology 32, 31–37, https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.14.1210a (2015).
Jahnke, S. et al. Combined MRI–PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. The Plant Journal 59, 634–644, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03888.x (2009).
Hubeau, M. & Steppe, K. Plant-PET Scans: In vivo mapping of xylem and phloem functioning. Trends Plant Sci 20, 676–685, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.008 (2015).
Ishii, S. et al. Real-time imaging of nitrogen fixation in an intact soybean plant with nodules using 13N-labeled nitrogen gas. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 55, 660–666, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00403.x (2009).
Uchida, H. et al. A compact planar positron imaging system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 516, 564–574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2003.08.165 (2004).
Neumann, G. & Martinoia, E. Cluster roots – an underground adaptation for survival in extreme environments. Trends in Plant Science 7, 162–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02241-0 (2002).
Neumann, G., George, T. & Plassard, C. Strategies and methods for studying the rhizosphere—the plant science toolbox. Plant and Soil 321, 431–456, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9953-9 (2009).
Helal, H. M. & Sauerbeck, D. Short term determination of the actual respiration rate of intact plant roots. Developments in Agricultural and Managed Forest Ecology Vol. 24 (eds B. L. McMichael & H. Persson) 88-92 (Elsevier, 1991).
Florez-Sarasa, I., Lambers, H., Wang, X., Finnegan, P. M. & Ribas-Carbo, M. The alternative respiratory pathway mediates carboxylate synthesis in white lupin cluster roots under phosphorus deprivation. Plant, Cell & Environment 37, 922–928, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12208 (2014).
Walker, T. S., Bais, H. P., Grotewold, E. & Vivanco, J. M. Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiology 132, 44–51, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.019661 (2003).
Jones, D. L., Hodge, A. & Kuzyakov, Y. Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. New Phytologist 163, 459–480, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01130.x (2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. Hiroyuki Suto (Tokyo Nuclear Services Co. Ltd, Japan) for technical assistance with 11CO2 production. We thank Prof. Takuji Ohyama (Niigata University, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan) for providing the B. diazoefficiens strain USDA110 and Prof. Jun Wasaki (Hiroshima University, Japan) for providing white lupin seeds. We thank Dr. Mitsutaka Yamaguchi and Dr. Yuto Nagao for their help with calculating the gamma-ray penetration rate. We thank Lesley Benyon, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers JP23380155, JP24780251, JP15H04578, JP15H02438, and 19H01169).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.-G.Y., S.F., T.N., T.S. and N.K. designed the rhizobox and the imaging experiments. Y.-G.Y., N.S., K.K., Y.M., Y.U. and N.K. conducted the PETIS imaging experiments and analysed the imaging data. Y.-G.Y., N.S. and N.K. wrote the manuscript, which was reviewed by the other authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, YG., Suzui, N., Kurita, K. et al. Visualising spatio-temporal distributions of assimilated carbon translocation and release in root systems of leguminous plants. Sci Rep 10, 8446 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65668-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65668-9
- Springer Nature Limited