Abstract
Motor learning is essential to maintain accurate behavioral responses. We used a larval zebrafish model to study ocular motor learning behaviors. During a sustained period of optokinetic stimulation in 5-day-old wild-type zebrafish larvae the slow-phase eye velocity decreased over time. Then interestingly, a long-lasting and robust negative optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN) was evoked upon light extinction. The slow-phase velocity, the quick-phase frequency, and the decay time constant of the negative OKAN were dependent on the stimulus duration and the adaptation to the preceding optokinetic stimulation. Based on these results, we propose a sensory adaptation process during continued optokinetic stimulation, which, when the stimulus is removed, leads to a negative OKAN as the result of a changed retinal slip velocity set point, and thus, a sensorimotor memory. The pronounced negative OKAN in larval zebrafish not only provides a practical solution to the hitherto unsolved problems of observing negative OKAN, but also, and most importantly, can be readily applied as a powerful model for studying sensorimotor learning and memory in vertebrates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sensory-motor learning is essential for animals to ensure accurate performance and motor coordination during reflex and voluntary behaviors1,2. Because movement accuracy can be compromised by many factors, such as changes in the environment, injuries in the central or peripheral motor systems, and the inherent variability of central motor commands, the brain relies on mechanisms such as neural adaptation3,4 and habituation5,6 to better control movements. The optokinetic system, which produces reflexive eye tracking movements in response to full-field motion of the visual surround, provides advantageous means to study sensorimotor learning. This system is highly conserved across vertebrate species, and its main function is to stabilize the visual image on the retina, thereby allowing high-resolution vision7,8. The resultant optokinetic nystagmus (OKN, or the optokinetic response/reflex, OKR) eye movements are robust and stereotyped7,9,10.
The velocity storage mechanism is a multisensory element that “stores” the visual and head velocity information received from the optokinetic and vestibular systems, respectively11,12. Following the offset of visual stimulation, subjects continue to generate persistent eye movements in the dark – termed optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN) – which are attributed to the velocity storage mechanism11. In human, other mammalian and non-mammalian species that were studied, the direction of the OKAN response is the same as the preceding OKN response and is termed positive OKAN11,13,14,15,16,17.
In addition to the positive OKAN, a negative OKAN (normally recorded after the cessation of positive OKAN), referring to afternystagmus beating in the opposite direction to the preceding OKN, has been identified in various organisms16,18,19,20,21,22,23. It is believed that the longer lasting negative OKAN is first masked by the shorter lasting positive OKAN; moreover, positive and negative OKAN seem to present a mutual waning and waxing relationship, as longer optokinetic stimulation leads to a weaker positive OKAN followed by stronger negative OKAN19,24,25. Furthermore, the manifestation of negative OKAN could be influenced not only by positive OKAN20,26, but also by smooth pursuit afternystagmus in foveated animals, in which the eyes continue moving in the same direction as the previous foveal tracking behavior27,28,29.
In the present study, we employed a larval zebrafish model to investigate negative OKAN. Taking advantage of the relatively inconspicuous positive OKAN and nonexistent smooth pursuit in the ocular motor system in larval zebrafish, robust negative OKAN could readily be elicited after sustained optokinetic stimulation in larvae at 5 days postfertilization (dpf). We observed the decay of OKN slow-phase velocity (SPV) during the optokinetic stimulation followed by negative OKAN with multiple time scales when the light was extinguished, or when images stopped moving. The SPV decay could be attributed to both sensory habituation and set-point adaptation of the retinal slip velocity; moreover, the set-point adaptation leads to the poststimulatory negative OKAN. This hypothesis is further supported by our mathematical simulations that fit the experimental data well when both mechanisms are incorporated. In summary, larval zebrafish offers a unique model to study sensorimotor learning by further investigations of the neurophysiological mechanisms that underlie negative OKAN.
Results
Negative OKAN in larval zebrafish
To test set-point adaptation in the ocular motor system by observing OKN and the resulting OKAN under different stimulus conditions, we recorded the eye movements of the larval zebrafish during 3 phases (see Methods; Fig. 1): First a 5 min base line period in the dark, next followed by 20 min of unidirectional 10 deg/sec optokinetic stimulation and finally another 20 min of darkness. Representative eye-position traces are shown in Fig. 2. We identified quick phase eye movements in both positive and negative directions (see Methods) for recorded eye movement (Fig. 2A). Magnification of the transitions between each of the three phases in Fig. 2A are shown in Fig. 2B (prestimulation to stimulation) and Fig. 2C (stimulation to poststimulation). In the dark before the optokinetic stimulation, eye movements consisted of bidirectional spontaneous saccades followed by centripetal slow eye drifts (Fig. 2B). After sustained optokinetic stimulation, we observed the negative OKAN for a duration of approximately 7 min (Fig. 2A,C). Interestingly, during negative OKAN, the beating field deviated toward the side of the previous stimulus direction (0 to 15 deg, Fig. 2A). In contrast, the eyes moved across a broader range during spontaneous eye movement in both the pre- and poststimulatory phases (±15 deg, Fig. 2A). Moreover, we could record a SPV accelerating phase (build-up phase, Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B) or a “silent” period of more than 30 seconds (Supplementary Fig. S1C) during the initial period of negative OKAN, suggesting the velocity storage of the preceding OKN.
Quantification of negative OKAN in larval zebrafish
To quantify negative OKAN, we analyzed SPVs between each quick phase. The average SPVs of every 10 sec over the entire 45-min recording period are shown in Fig. 3A (the single subject data of Fig. 2) and 3C (the average values of 15 subjects). In response to counterclockwise-rotating optokinetic stimulation (which was applied throughout the study), right eyes displayed faster SPV than left eyes due to the temporal-to-nasal asymmetry in lateral-eyed animals7,16,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41. We additionally computed the quick-phase frequency (QPF) and compared the pre- and poststimulatory values. We categorized the quick phases into positive and negative groups (Fig. 2A) and subsequently estimated the frequency of each group in a time window of 10 sec. The ∆QPF was calculated by subtracting the positive QPF from the negative QPF. The ∆QPFs are shown in Fig. 3B (the single subject data of Fig. 2) and 3D (the average values of 15 subjects). We calculated Pearson correlation between the average SPVs and the corresponding ∆QPFs for the same 10-sec time window. Our data showed a significant correlation between SPV and ∆QPF in larval zebrafish (Supplementary Fig. S2; Supplementary Table S1), similar results were found previously in human and mouse subjects42,43. Thus, we suggest that both SPV and QPF analyses give comparable estimates of the negative OKAN.
Time course of negative OKAN in larval zebrafish
We estimated the dynamics of OKN adaptation by fitting the decline of the SPV during the optokinetic stimulation phase with a second-order exponential decay model (Fig. 3C; OKN adaptation time constants ±95% confidence interval: 0.35 ± 0.36 min and 1.93 ± 0.82 min (left eye); 0.54 ± 0.23 min and 6.15 ± 4.66 min (right eye)). Using a similar method, we also estimated the decay of negative OKAN by fitting the poststimulatory SPV with a first-order exponential decay model (Fig. 3C: OKAN decay time constant ±95% confidence interval: 7.03 ± 0.79 min (left eye) and 5.02 ± 0.81 min (right eye)). Note, to avoid the velocity build-up (accelerating) phase (see ② in Fig. 1C), the first 2 min of the OKAN velocity data were excluded from the fitting. We also estimated the decay time courses of ∆QPF in the same way as with the SPV data: second-order exponential decay fitting for OKN adaptation and first-order exponential decay fitting for negative OKAN (Fig. 3D; OKN adaptation time constant ±95% confidence interval: 0.41 ± 0.21 min and 8.86 ± 1.28 min (left eye); 0.39 ± 0.17 min and 8.68 ± 1.28 min (right eye); OKAN decay time constant ±95% confidence interval: 4.22 ± 0.60 min (left eye) and 3.94 ± 0.55 min (right eye)).
The dependence of negative OKAN on optokinetic stimulus duration
To further study and estimate the negative OKAN dynamics, we subjected zebrafish larvae to optokinetic stimulation of different durations. First, we show representative eye traces after 4, 5, 7, 10, 20 and 40 min of 10 deg/sec optokinetic stimulation (Fig. 4). A robust negative OKAN, defined as continuous beating in the same direction as the previous stimulus, lasted for a longer duration following a longer optokinetic stimulation. The magnified traces show the transition phases between stimulatory and poststimulatory periods, in which one can clearly visualize the more sharpened (i.e., faster) poststimulatory eye movement and the increased poststimulatory beating frequency as the stimulus duration is prolonged. The average SPV and ∆QPF following 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 20 and 40 min of stimulation are shown in Fig. 5A,B,G,H, respectively. To better estimate the time span of negative OKAN following different stimulus durations, we subjected the SPV and ∆QPF of negative OKAN to exponential decay fitting. Due to the relatively low negative OKAN amplitude that largely decreased the signal-to-noise ratio, 3- and 4-min data were not subjected to fitting. The SPV decay fit traces were normalized to the peak and were plotted in Fig. 5C (left eye) and 5D (right eye), and the estimated time constants were plotted in Fig. 5E (Supplementary Table S2). The SPV data showed a significant correlation between stimulus duration and the decay time constant in both eyes (r = 0.87, p = 0.023, n = 6 in left eye and r = 0.93, p = 0.007, n = 6 in right eye, Pearson correlation analysis). The normalized fit traces of ∆QPF decay are shown in Fig. 5I,J, and the estimated time constants are shown in Fig. 5K (Supplementary Table S2). The ∆QPF data also showed a significant correlation between negative OKAN decay time course and stimulus duration (r = 0.95, p = 0.004, n = 6 in left eye and r = 0.89, p = 0.017, n = 6 in right eye, Pearson correlation analysis).
Correlation between the amplitude of the negative OKAN and the adaptation extent to the preceding optokinetic stimulus
To study the correlation between the ultimate OKN adaptation, which is defined as the maximal reduction of OKN SPV or ∆QPF from the initial peak values to the close-to-plateau phase values during stimulation (estimated by fitting with a second-order exponential decay function), and the negative OKAN amplitude, which is defined as the absolute peak velocity or peak ∆QPF of OKAN (Fig. 5A,B,G,H), we performed a series of Pearson correlation analyses. The average OKAN amplitudes were plotted over the estimated OKN adaptation (Fig. 5F,L). The velocity data collected from both eyes showed significant correlations between estimated OKN adaptation and average negative OKAN amplitude (Fig. 5F; r = 0.96, p = 2.095e-04, n = 8 (left eye) and r = 0.77, p = 0.026, n = 8 (right eye), Pearson correlation analysis). Similarly, the ∆QPF data collected from both eyes also (Fig. 5L) showed a significant correlation between estimated OKN adaptation and average negative OKAN amplitude (r = 0.93, p = 7.295e-04, n = 8 (left eye) and r = 0.92, p = 0.001, n = 8 (right eye), Pearson correlation analysis). In summary, the OKN adaptation and the negative OKAN displayed a corresponding increase in their size, which may suggest shared underlying mechanisms of both phenomena.
Altered eye drift properties during negative OKAN in poststimulatory darkness
In animals, velocity-to-position integrator receives velocity signal and generates position signal to hold the gaze8. When the integrator is leaky (i.e. when the eyes cannot be held steady at an eccentric position), position signal decays exponentially, and thus the eye drifts back to the central position in the dark. Due to the leaky velocity-to-position neural integrator in larval zebrafish44, eye beatings toward more eccentric positions during negative OKAN could lead to a faster centripetal eye drifts and therefore an increase in the measured SPV. During both OKN and negative OKAN periods, eye beating fields deviated toward the side of the optokinetic stimulus direction (−5 deg to + 15 deg for OKN and 0–15 for OKAN, Fig. 2A), raising the concern of the possibility that the observed negative OKAN (or the increased poststimulatory SPV in darkness) could be simply leaky integrator-resulting centripetal eye drifts at more eccentric positions following asymmetric eye beatings. Thus, we drew the regression lines of the median velocity on median position of each slow phase in pre- and poststimulatory darkness. The result revealed a left/downward shift of the regression line after 20 min of stimulation in both eyes (Fig. 6), suggesting changed position-to-SPV relationship. Besides SPV, we also analyzed changes of the null position of the eye: Null positions are estimated as the x-intercept of regression lines, which are shifted from −8.02 deg to −23.56 deg in left eye and from 9.19 deg to −22.81 deg in right eye (calculated from the estimates listed in Supplementary Table S3). We additionally estimated the null position by using the entire slow phase data for the velocity-position plot which gave a similar result (data not shown).
We also tested the negative OKAN under stationary gratings because the influence of the leaky velocity-to-position neural integrator on poststimulatory SPV should be minimized in this viewing condition as the optokinetic system would normally stabilize the gaze (see Fig. 2A by Chen et al.44). In our data, eye position traces revealed clear negative OKAN under stationary gratings (Fig. 7A,B); moreover, the SPV under stationary gratings was faster after optokinetic stimulation compared to the baseline value before optokinetic stimulation (Fig. 7C). After exclusion of the first 2-min post-optokinetic stimulation data, the estimated negative OKAN decay time constants ± 95% confidence intervals are 13.55 ± 2.91 (left eye) and 2.25 ± 0.49 min (right eye), respectively. This fitting period selection is identical to that of the exponential fit of poststimulatory SPVs for minimizing the influence of velocity build-up phase (Fig. 4). However, since in this case there was no observable speed build-up phase at the beginning of the negative OKAN (Fig. 7D,E), we performed another time constant estimation by fitting the negative OKAN SPV data of the entire postoptokinetic stationary period and obtained time constants ± 95% confidence interval of 7.28 ± 0.96 min (left eye) and 2.41 ± 0.23 min (right eye), respectively.
Conceptual and mathematical model of negative OKAN
Based on the empirical data of OKN and negative OKAN in larval zebrafish, we hypothesize that sustained optokinetic stimulation leads to a set-point adaptation of the retinal slip velocity, which is reflected by the decreased SPV of OKN during the stimulation and manifested as negative OKAN in poststimulatory darkness (e.g., Figs. 3A,C, 5A,B). However, the SPV reduction cannot be explained by the set-point adaptation alone since the “adapted” amount (i.e. SPV reduction during OKN) is larger than the negative OKAN amplitude (e.g., Figs. 3A,C, 5A,B). Thus, we further suggest sensory habituation as another underlying mechanism that takes place simultaneously during the sustained stimulatory period.
To test these proposals, we simulated the conceptual model depicted in Fig. 8. The control system sends a motor command to the eyes in response to an error signal, which is the difference between the retinal slip velocity and its “internal” set point. The set point of the retinal slip velocity is normally 0 because the purpose of the optokinetic system is to stabilize the image on the retinae. The motor command simultaneously charges the adaptation operator (i.e. a leaky velocity integrator, the red component in Fig. 8) that defines the set point; therefore, over a sustained period of optokinetic stimulation, the change of the set point allows the optokinetic system to slow down its eye tracking without increasing the error signal despite of an increase in actual retinal slip. The habituation transfer function serves as a sensory filter that reduces the sensory input (i.e. the actual retinal slip velocity) at time. Once the light is extinguished, the current set point is subtracted from the sensory input of 0 (i.e. no visual input in the dark), which leads to an error signal of the set-point value but with an opposite sign. This error signal then drives the eyes to move in the opposite direction, i.e. the negative OKAN. The decay of negative OKAN represents the discharge of the set-point adaptation operator.
Figure 9 demonstrates the model simulations and the empirical SPVs. Supplementary Table S4 lists all estimated parameters and goodness of fit. In addition, we also show the simulation result of including either only the set-point adaptation transfer function or the habituation transfer function to further demonstrate the necessity of having both transfer functions in the model to explain our experimental data (Supplementary Fig. S3 and Supplementary Table S5). Notably, when we only include sensory habituation transfer function (Supplementary Fig. S3A), the model readout shows no negative OKAN (Supplementary Fig. S3B). Furthermore, when we only include set-point adaptation transfer function (Supplementary Fig. S3C), the simulation only fits the negative OKAN part (Supplementary Fig. S3D). Thus, computer simulation leads to the same conclusion as the empirical data that negative OKAN is the result of set-point adaptation; however, without sensory habituation we could not explain the dynamical changes of SPVs during a sustained period of optokinetic stimulation.
Discussion
In this present study, we observed that the OKN responses of zebrafish show velocity adaptation in response to sustained visual stimulation, which, following the offset of the visual stimulus, is manifested as negative OKAN with shifted null position. We proposed a mechanism comprising multiple time course set-point adaptation of retinal slip velocity and using mathematical modeling we confirm that simulation of such a mechanism provides an excellent match to our empirical data.
Larval zebrafish as a novel model to study negative OKAN
The evolutionary difference in ocular motor circuits among animals and the variation in experimental paradigms might be two of the most important factors determining the various dynamics of negative OKAN documented in the literature. For instance, the smooth pursuit afternystagmus27,28, which occurs after foveal tracking of a moving target, likely masks or overshadows the negative OKAN in humans29. Afoveate animals are usually believed to display no robust smooth pursuit45,46. However, with only visual streaks, rabbits can display afternystagmus in the preceding OKN direction in darkness for more than 50 min25. This time scale is more similar to smooth pursuit afternystagmus than to positive OKAN, which is believed to last up to two minutes. Taking advantage of the fact that larval zebrafish perform no smooth pursuit and only inconspicuous positive OKAN, we were able to study the dynamics of negative OKAN independently. Our results are consistent with a recent scientific report on set-point adaptation in the vestibular system which suggests motor learning takes place on multiple time scales in an adaptive process47.
Velocity storage mechanism and negative OKAN in larval zebrafish
For a very long time, the optokinetic and the vestibular systems have been believed to share the same velocity-storage element48, which is fed by both visual and vestibular signals and is modified by gravity12. Positive OKAN reveals the discharge of the velocity storage11. In humans, labyrinth defects markedly diminishes positive OKAN18,49,50; therefore, vestibular input has been considered crucial for positive OKAN generation. The underdeveloped vestibular apparatus in larval zebrafish51 has been proposed to account for the missing positive OKAN in the animal10. Chen and colleagues proposed that the velocity-to-position neural integrator in larval zebrafish is not fully developed and leaky so that the velocity input from velocity storage mechanism fades away quickly, hence the difficulty in observing the positive OKAN44. Our data in the present study suggested a similar idea based on different pieces of evidence: we observed a quiet period (Supplementary Fig. S1C and Fig. 4B) or a build-up phase of the absolute SPV of negative OKAN for no more than 2 min (Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B, and Fig. 7D,E). Thus, our results suggest that despite the fact that a positive OKAN is lacking, negative OKAN is initially suppressed, most likely by velocity-storage components, further supporting velocity storage mechanism being at least partially developed and functional in 5-dpf zebrafish larvae.
Interestingly, under the stationary grating condition such a negative OKAN build-up phase has not been observed (Fig. 7D,E). Waespe and colleagues reported that a 5-sec stationary grating image exposure immediately after an optokinetic stimulation shortened the positive OKAN duration and increased both the duration and velocity of negative OKAN in primates26. Our data in larval zebrafish are consistent with their finding and suggest that while negative OKAN continues for minutes under the exposure of a stationary image surround, the velocity storage is discharged right away (Fig. 7). To adapt quickly to the dynamical world, it has been proposed that the cerebellum is sensitive to variation in visual and vestibular signals and erases the previously developed velocity storage52.
Negative OKAN demonstrates a set-point adaptation in the optokinetic system
This is the first time that set-point adaptation of retinal slip velocities has been applied to a model for negative OKAN. Previously, Leigh et al. suggested that the occurrence of negative OKAN is attributable to an adaptive mechanism53, a notion that is similar to the set-point adaptation. However, one important phenomenon during optokinetic set-point adaptation, the decrease in SPV during sustained OKN, has not been discussed in the past with the exception of a recent report in zebrafish larvae54. We speculate that, despite of the underlying set-point adaptation, the decreased SPV has not been observed in other rodent or primate models due to the prototypical cerebellar learning behavior, which on the contrary would increase the SPV gain during sustained optokinetic stimulation55,56. Without an observation of a decreased OKN gain, one is not able to introduce the set-point adaptation to the negative OKAN model.
In contrast, zebrafish larvae do not appear to show such a gain-increase adaptation during optokinetic stimulation (unpublished data) and therefore can serve as a suitable model to test the set-point adaptation hypothesis for the negative OKAN. Our present study provides clear evidence for a decline in SPV during sustained OKN, indicating the underlying mechanism of set-point adaptation. However, set-point adaptation alone cannot explain the difference between the reduced SPV during OKN and the negative OKAN amplitude in the empirical data. Our simulations with only a set-point adaptation operator, underestimated adaptation (Supplementary Fig. S3D), while the addition of sensory habituation to our model provided dynamics that better fit our data (Fig. 8). Indeed, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in larval zebrafish54 demonstrate sensory adaption (attenuated response over time) to visual stimuli. Thus we speculate that sustained optokinetic stimulation leads to a filtered (sensory adapted) input at the first stages of visual processing (e.g. retina) before the signal is transmitted further downstream where set-point adaptation then occurs. Taken together, both our empirical data and the model simulation results suggest that the combined effects of sensory habituation and set-point adaptation and reduce the SPV of OKN. Set-point adaptation alone, however, contributes to the negative OKAN. It remains to be determined exactly how these two mechanisms are implemented at the circuit level.
Methods
All experiments in this study were carried out in agreement with the Federal Veterinary Office of Switzerland (FVO) guidelines for animal welfare and were run and designed in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the Testing of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Specially, no ethical approval is necessary for studies on larvae before they start independent feeding (120 hpf/5dpf), which is in accordance with the TSchV art. 112 stating experiments involving larvae that already ingest food freely need an approved license, which does not apply to this study.
Fish breeding and upkeep
AB and TU wild-type zebrafish lines were bred and maintained in 28 °C E3 (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, and 0.33 mM MgSO4) as described previously57,58 under a cycle of 14 hours of light/10 hours of darkness. Larvae at the age of 5 dpf were used for the experiments.
Experimental overview
The zebrafish larvae were placed in the center of an optokinetic cylinder where we could surround the fish with moving or stationary visual stimuli (Fig. 1A,B). The experiments consisted of three phases: First, a baseline period in which spontaneous eye movements were recorded either in darkness or in the presence of illuminated stationary gratings; next, an optokinetic stimulatory phase (OKN); and finally, a postoptokinetic-stimulatory phase (OKAN) in darkness or surrounded by illuminated stationary gratings. These three phases are shown in the schematic diagram in Fig. 1C, where hypothetical negative OKANs are affected by different levels of velocity-storage components (Fig. 1C, ① to ③ show the influence of weak to strong velocity-storage components). Eye positions were recorded during all three phases. The median of the SPV was computed for further analysis of OKN and OKAN (the bottom of Fig. C).
Stimulation of optokinetic nystagmus
All experiments were performed between 8:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Zebrafish larvae were restrained in low-melting agarose and placed in the center of an optokinetic drum without immobilizing the eyes. OKN was evoked through the usage of four digital light projectors (Samsung SP-H03 Pico Projector). The optokinetic stimulus consisted of a moving, computer-controlled black and white vertical sinusoid grating pattern with 100% contrast (maximum illumination 1524 lux) and spatial frequency of 0.053 cycles per degree projected onto a transparent screen at an angular velocity of 10 deg/sec, with stimuli lasting 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 20, 30 or 40 min. A custom-made program written in LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, Texas, USA)44 was used to control all the experimental processes and conditions such as frame processing, data recording, visual stimulus properties, and lighting.
Eye movement recording and analysis
Zebrafish larvae at 5 dpf were tested. To prevent body movement without restricting eye movement, we embedded each larva dorsal side up in the center of a low-melting agarose drop (Sigma Type VII-A)59 on the bottom of a transparent glass plate. A platinum wire tool was used to remove the agarose around the head region so that the eyes could move freely in their regular medium, water. Thereafter, the larva-containing plate was completely submerged in the center of a translucent screen-wrapped glass cylinder filled with water and illuminated from below with infrared (IR)-emitting diodes (λpeak = 875 ± 15 nm, OIS-150 880, OSA Opto Light GmbH, Germany). The movements of both eyes were recorded at a sampling rate of 40 frames per sec by an IR-sensitive charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. The area around the eyes was manually selected as the region of interest. For each larva, spontaneous eye movements in the dark or in the presence of illuminated stationary gratings were recorded for 5 min, followed by a counterclockwise-rotating optokinetic stimulus lasting for the scheduled duration (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 20, 30 or 40 min). Throughout this paper, both the horizontal eye rotation and the rotating optokinetic stimulus in the counterclockwise direction are marked as positive. After the stimulus ended, either the light was turned off or the gratings were turned to stationary, and the recording of the OKAN eye movement continued until the larva regained its spontaneous eye movements. Data were analyzed using custom-developed software written in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Eye-position traces were smoothened using a Gaussian filter with a cutoff frequency of 5.5 Hz to increase the signal/noise ratio44. Eye movement velocity was calculated as the derivative of eye-position traces. To prevent the eye trace smoothing procedure from changing saccades into the slow phase data, we applied a three-step desaccading procedure to correctly identify quick- and slow-phases. Quick-phases and/or saccade eye movements were identified by a velocity threshold of 20 deg/sec that was applied to median velocities over a time window of every 0.5 sec and an eye dislocation threshold of 1 deg followed by manual adjustments60,61. Following desaccading the SPV was estimated as the median velocity in the first second of each slow phase. Similarly, we also computed the median eye position and used both data to draw the V-P (SPV versus Position) plot. The linear regression of velocity on position was estimated with ordinary least square by applying the fitlm function in MATLAB. We categorized the quick phases according to the velocity sign into positive and negative groups (Fig. 2A), followed by computing the QPF with counting the number of quick-phase eye movements in a time window of every 10 sec. To estimate the kinetics of the OKN adaptation, we fitted both the SPV and the change in quick-phase frequency (∆QPF), which was obtained by subtracting the positive QPF from the negative QPF, with a second-order exponential decay function:
where f(t) represents SPV or ∆QPF function of time (t), G1 is the gain of the first decay phase, t0 is the onset of optokinetic simulation, τ1 is the time constant of the first decay phase, G2 is the gain of the second decay phase, and τ2 is the time constant of the second decay phase.
To estimate the decay kinetics of negative OKAN, we fitted both the SPV and ∆QPF with a first-order exponential decay function:
where f(t) represents SPV or ∆QPF function of time (t), G is the gain, tc is the cessation of optokinetic simulation, τ is the time constant of decay and “offset” is not considered because SPV and ∆QPF are assumed to return to 0 gradually after the stimulation.
Model
To better understand how the experimentally-observed set-point adaptation occurs, we used a nonlinear model with a set of adaptation and habituation leaky integrators (Fig. 8) that is described by different sets of equations during stimulus presentation and after stimulus offset (i.e., during darkness). During stimulation, the model is described by the following set of differential equations:
where \(X={[A,Q,H]}^{T}\), Ve is the eye velocity, and Vs is the stimulus velocity. Here A, Q and H are the outputs of the leaky integrators of the adaption operator, velocity storage model and habituation operator, respectively. Moreover, g is the oculomotor gain; kVSM and TVSM are velocity storage gain and time-constant; ka is adaptation gain, and Ta is adaptation time constant; h is habituation gain; kh is habituation gain, and Th is habituation time constant; Vr denotes the retinal slip velocity.
After stimulus offset (onset of the darkness), the model is described by the following set of differential equations:
where \(Y={[A,Q]}^{T}\) and A and Q are defined as previously. The model was simulated using Simulink in MATLAB (the Mathworks, Natick, MA). We used global optimization (globalSearch function in MATLAB) in order to maximize the variance accounted for (VAF) defined by:
where Ve,est and Ve,measured are the model estimated and experimentally measured values of eye velocity, respectively, and var(.) denotes the variance. We used nonlinear least squares method and trust-region-reflective algorithm to optimize the parameters of the model.
Data availability
Data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The custom analysis code used in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Bastian, A. J. Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 21, 628–633, https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e328315a293 (2008).
Della-Maggiore, V., Landi, S. M. & Villalta, J. I. Sensorimotor adaptation: multiple forms of plasticity in motor circuits. Neuroscientist 21, 109–125, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858414545228 (2015).
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z. & Flanagan, J. R. Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 5, 487–494 (2001).
Thoroughman, K. A., Fine, M. S. & Taylor, J. A. Trial-by-trial motor adaptation: a window into elemental neural computation. Prog Brain Res 165, 373–382, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65023-1 (2007).
Shepard, N. T., Telian, S. A. & Smith-Wheelock, M. Habituation and balance retraining therapy. A retrospective review. Neurol Clin 8, 459–475 (1990).
Hall, C. D. & Cox, L. C. The role of vestibular rehabilitation in the balance disorder patient. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42, 161–169, xi, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2008.09.006 (2009).
Huang, Y. Y. & Neuhauss, S. C. The optokinetic response in zebrafish and its applications. Front Biosci 13, 1899–1916 (2008).
Leigh, R. J. & Zee, D. S. The neurology of eye movements. 5th edition. edn, (Oxford University Press, 2015).
Rinner, O., Rick, J. M. & Neuhauss, S. C. Contrast sensitivity, spatial and temporal tuning of the larval zebrafish optokinetic response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46, 137–142, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0682 (2005).
Beck, J. C., Gilland, E., Tank, D. W. & Baker, R. Quantifying the ontogeny of optokinetic and vestibuloocular behaviors in zebrafish, medaka, and goldfish. J Neurophysiol 92, 3546–3561, https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00311.2004 (2004).
Cohen, B., Henn, V., Raphan, T. & Dennett, D. Velocity storage, nystagmus, and visual-vestibular interactions in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 374, 421–433 (1981).
Laurens, J. & Angelaki, D. E. The functional significance of velocity storage and its dependence on gravity. Experimental Brain Research 210, 407–422, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2568-4 (2011).
Takahashi, M. & Igarashi, M. Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Optokinetic Nystagmus in the Squirrel Monkey. Orl 39, 321–329, https://doi.org/10.1159/000275374 (1977).
Igarashi, M., Takahashi, M. & Homick, J. L. Optokinetic nystagmus and vestibular stimulation in squirrel monkey model. Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 218, 115–121, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00469739 (1977).
Tan, H. S., Collewijn, H. & Van der Steen, J. Optokinetic nystagmus in the rabbit and its modulation by bilateral microinjection of carbachol in the cerebellar flocculus. Experimental Brain Research 90, 456–468, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00230928 (1992).
Hess, B. J. M., Precht, W., Reber, A. & Cazin, L. Horizontal optokinetic ocular nystagmus in the pigmented rat. Neuroscience 15, 97–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(85)90126-5 (1985).
Marsh, E. & Baker, R. Normal and adapted visuooculomotor reflexes in goldfish. J Neurophysiol 77, 1099–1118 (1997).
Zee, D. S., Yee, R. D. & Robinson, D. A. Optokinetic responses in labyrinthine-defective human beings. Brain Res 113, 423–428 (1976).
Brandt, T., Dichgans, J. & Buchle, W. Motion habituation: inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after-nystagmus. Exp Brain Res 21, 337–352 (1974).
Waespe, W. & Henn, V. Reciprocal changes in primary and secondary optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN) produced by repetitive optokinetic stimulation in the monkey. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 225, 23–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00367349 (1978).
Bures, J. & Neverov, V. P. Reversed postoptokinetic nystagmus: a model of plasticity in the vestibuloocular system. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 39, 477–490 (1979).
Neverov, V. P., Buresova, O. & Bures, J. Effect of ECS on the neural traces underlying the reversive postoptokinetic nystagmus in the rabbit. Physiol Behav 18, 7–11 (1977).
Maioli, C. Optokinetic nystagmus: modeling the velocity storage mechanism. J Neurosci 8, 821–832 (1988).
Buttner, U., Waespe, W. & Henn, V. Duration and direction of optokinetic after-nystagmus as a function of stimulus exposure time in the monkey. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970) 222, 281–291 (1976).
Barmack, N. H. & Nelson, B. J. Influence of long-term optokinetic stimulation on eye movements of the rabbit. Brain Research 437, 111–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)91532-0 (1987).
Waespe, W., Huber, T. & Henn, V. Dynamic changes of optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN) caused by brief visual fixation periods in monkey and in man. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten Vereinigt mit Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 226, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00344118 (1978).
Marti, S., Bockisch, C. J. & Straumann, D. Prolonged asymmetric smooth-pursuit stimulation leads to downbeat nystagmus in healthy human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0235 (2005).
Muratore, R. & Zee, D. S. Pursuit after-nystagmus. Vision Res 19, 1057–1059 (1979).
Lin, T. F., Gerth-Kahlert, C., Hanson, J. V. M., Straumann, D. & Huang, M. Y. Spontaneous Nystagmus in the Dark in an Infantile Nystagmus Patient May Represent Negative Optokinetic Afternystagmus. Front Neurol 9, 151, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00151 (2018).
Braun, J. J. & Gault, F. P. Monocular and binocular control of horizontal optokinetic nystagmus in cats and rabbits. J Comp Physiol Psychol 69, 12–16 (1969).
Erickson, R. G. & Barmack, N. H. A comparison of the horizontal and vertical optokinetic reflexes of the rabbit. Exp Brain Res 40, 448–456 (1980).
Yucel, Y. H., Kim, M. S., Jardon, B. & Bonaventure, N. Abolition of monocular optokinetic nystagmus directional asymmetry after unilateral visual deprivation in adult vertebrates: involvement of the GABAergic mechanism. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 53, 179–185 (1990).
Wallman, J. & Velez, J. Directional asymmetries of optokinetic nystagmus: developmental changes and relation to the accessory optic system and to the vestibular system. J Neurosci 5, 317–329 (1985).
Gioanni, H., Rey, J., Villalobos, J., Bouyer, J. J. & Gioanni, Y. Optokinetic nystagmus in the pigeon (Columba livia). I. Study in monocular and binocular vision. Exp Brain Res 44, 362–370 (1981).
De’sperati, C., Tempia, F., Harvey, R. & Strata, P. Vergence compensation during binocularly- and monocularly-evoked horizontal optokinetic nystagmus in the pigmented rat. Vision Res 34, 3335–3345 (1994).
Bonaventure, N., Wioland, N. & Bigenwald, J. Involvement of GABAergic mechanisms in the optokinetic nystagmus of the frog. Exp Brain Res 50, 433–441 (1983).
Keng, M. J. & Anastasio, T. J. The horizontal optokinetic response of the goldfish. Brain Behav Evol 49, 214–229, https://doi.org/10.1159/000112993 (1997).
Klar, M. & Hoffmann, K. P. Visual direction-selective neurons in the pretectum of the rainbow trout. Brain Res Bull 57, 431–433 (2002).
Qian, H. et al. Directional asymmetries in the optokinetic response of larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). Zebrafish 2, 189–196, https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2005.2.189 (2005).
Wallman, J. Subcortical optokinetic mechanisms. Rev Oculomot Res 5, 321–342 (1993).
Mueller, K. P. & Neuhauss, S. C. Quantitative measurements of the optokinetic response in adult fish. J Neurosci Methods 186, 29–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.020 (2010).
Soares, D., Cahill, H. & Nathans, J. The Optokinetic Reflex as a Tool for Quantitative Analyses of Nervous System Function in Mice: Application to Genetic and Drug-Induced Variation. PLoS One 3, e2055, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002055 (2008).
Waddington, J. & Harris, C. M. The distribution of quick phase interval durations in human optokinetic nystagmus. Exp Brain Res 224, 179–187, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3297-z (2013).
Chen, C. C. et al. Velocity storage mechanism in zebrafish larvae. J Physiol 592, 203–214, https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.258640 (2014).
Stahl, J. S. Using eye movements to assess brain function in mice. Vision Res 44, 3401–3410, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.011 (2004).
Evinger, C. & Fuchs, A. F. Saccadic, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat. J Physiol 285, 209–229 (1978).
Jareonsettasin, P. et al. Multiple Time Courses of Vestibular Set-Point Adaptation Revealed by Sustained Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Labyrinth. Current Biology 26, 1359–1366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.066 (2016).
Demer, J. L. & Robinson, D. A. Different time constants for optokinetic and vestibular nystagmus with a single velocity-storage element. Brain Res 276, 173–177 (1983).
Tomlinson, R. D., Rubin, A. M., Wallace, I. R. & Barber, H. O. Optokinetic afternystagmus and post rotatory nystagmus in patients with unilateral labyrinthine lesions. J Otolaryngol 13, 217–220 (1984).
Ireland, D. J. & Jell, R. M. Optokinetic after-nystagmus in man after loss or reduction of labyrinthine function - a preliminary report. J Otolaryngol 11, 86–90 (1982).
Lambert, F. M., Beck, J. C., Baker, R. & Straka, H. Semicircular canal size determines the developmental onset of angular vestibuloocular reflexes in larval Xenopus. J Neurosci 28, 8086–8095, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1288-08.2008 (2008).
Waespe, W., Cohen, B. & Raphan, T. Dynamic modification of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by the nodulus and uvula. Science 228, 199–202 (1985).
Leigh, R. J., Robinson, D. A. & Zee, D. S. A hypothetical explanation for periodic alternating nystagmus: instability in the optokinetic-vestibular system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 374, 619–635 (1981).
Perez-Schuster, V. et al. Sustained Rhythmic Brain Activity Underlies Visual Motion Perception in Zebrafish. Cell Rep 17, 1098–1112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.065 (2016).
Inoshita, T. & Hirano, T. Occurrence of long-term depression in the cerebellar flocculus during adaptation of optokinetic response. Elife 7, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36209 (2018).
Wada, N., Funabiki, K. & Nakanishi, S. Role of granule-cell transmission in memory trace of cerebellum-dependent optokinetic motor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 5373–5378, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402546111 (2014).
Mullins, M. C., Hammerschmidt, M., Haffter, P. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. Large-scale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: in search of genes controlling development in a vertebrate. Current biology: CB 4, 189–202 (1994).
Haffter, P. et al. The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 1–36 (1996).
Arrenberg, A. B. Fiber Optic-Based Photostimulation of Larval Zebrafish. Methods Mol Biol 1451, 343–354, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3771-4_24 (2016).
Romano, F., Tarnutzer, A. A., Straumann, D., Ramat, S. & Bertolini, G. Gaze-evoked nystagmus induced by alcohol intoxication. J Physiol 595, 2161–2173, https://doi.org/10.1113/JP273204 (2017).
Bertolini, G. et al. Gaze holding in healthy subjects. PLoS One 8, e61389, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061389 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Marco Penner, Christopher Bockisch and Urs Scheifele for the technical support, and Christian Grimm, Peter Achermann and Bernhard Hess for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Oxford McGill ZNZ Partnership in the Neurosciences Pilot Project Funding (K.E.C., M.J.C. and M.Y.H.), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (M.J.C.), the Research Grant for the Faculty of Medicine, UZH (M.Y.H.), the Dr. Dabbous Foundation (T.-F.L., A.M.F., D.S. and M.Y.H.), and the Betty and David Koetser Foundation for Brain Research (T.-F.L. and M.Y.H.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.-F.L. and M.Y.H. designed the research, T.-F.L., M.M., A.F.M., D.P. and D.L. performed experiments, T.-F.L., M.M., F.R., D.S., K.E.C., M.J.C. and M.Y.H. performed analyses, and T.-F.L., M.M. and M.Y.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, TF., Mohammadi, M., Fathalla, A.M. et al. Negative optokinetic afternystagmus in larval zebrafish demonstrates set-point adaptation. Sci Rep 9, 19039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55457-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55457-4
- Springer Nature Limited