Abstract
In this work, we study the effect of introducing a periodic curvature on nanostructures, and demonstrate that the curvature can lead to a transition from a topologically trivial state to a non-trivial state. We first present the Hamiltonian for an arbitrarily curved nanostructure, and introduce a numerical scheme for calculating the bandstructure of a periodically curved nanostructure. Using this scheme, we calculate the bandstructure for a sinusoidally curved two-dimensional electron gas. We show that the curvature can lead to a partner switching reminiscent of a topological phase transition at the time reversal invariant momenta. We then study the Bernevig-Hughes-Zhang (BHZ) Hamiltonian for a two-dimensional quantum well. We show that introducing a curvature can lead to the emergence of topological surface states.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Quantum cosmology is intimately linked to space-time curvature1,2,3. It is however difficult to obtain experimental evidence of the curvature effect in the universe. The rapid progress in the fabrication of curved nanostructures can provide an experimental study of the curvature effect. More specifically, there is much interest in the investigation of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and spin transport in curved two-dimensional (2D) systems4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19.
Quantum phase transitions, which have attracted a great deal of attention recently20,21,22,23,24,25, are phase transitions between different quantum phases at zero temperature. In particular, quantum phase transitions can be driven by tuning a non-temperature parameter20. Nevertheless, until now no study has yet investigated the curvature effect on quantum phase transitions. Recent theoretical and experimental studies both indicate that curvature is of considerable significance in curved nanostructures4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Hence, in a large-curvature system, it is necessary to fully understand the curvature effect on the quantum phase transition. The aim of this paper is to theoretically demonstrate the existence of the curvature-dependent quantum phase transition. Hence, in a large-curvature system, it is necessary to fully understand the curvature effect on the quantum phase transition.
In Section (II) we use the example of a two-dimensional spin (σ) system to illustrate how the Hamiltonian is modified in the presence of curvature. Here, spin (σ) refers to a generalized spin-like internal degree of freedom of the wavefunction over the SU(2) Bloch sphere. In Section (III), using the modified Hamiltonian, we numerically calculate the band-structure for the exemplary case of a periodic sinusoidal curvature. We show that the curvature can substantially change the band-structure in a manner that is reminiscent of the transition between a topologically trivial insulator to a non-trivial state. This is, however, not yet a true topological phase transition. In Section (IV), we demonstrate that for the Bernevig-Hughes-Zhang Hamiltonian24 describing a two-dimensional topological insulator, introducing a curvature does lead to a topological phase transition from a topologically trivial insulator to a non-trivial insulator with topological surface states.
Physics of Curvature
We introduce the curvilinear coordinates qi, i = 1, 2, 3. Since our systems are two-dimensional, we need two independent coordinates to specify a point \(\overrightarrow{r}\) on the surface. We denote these two coordinates as q1 and q2, so that a point on the surface is specified by \(\overrightarrow{r}=(x({q}^{1},{q}^{2}),y({q}^{1},{q}^{2}),z({q}^{1},{q}^{2}))\). Two (not necessarily orthonormal) basis vectors tangential to the surface, ei, i = (1, 2), are \({e}_{i}\equiv {\partial }_{i}\overrightarrow{r}\). An arbitrary point in three-dimensional space \(\overrightarrow{R}\) can then be specified in terms of the qi s as \(\overrightarrow{R}=\overrightarrow{r}({q}^{1},{q}^{2})+{q}^{3}\hat{n}({q}^{1},{q}^{2})\) where \(\hat{n}\) ≡ e1 × e2/|e1 × e2| is the normal vector to the surface.
Let us first consider a generic two-dimensional system with spin σj,
In the study of curvilinear systems, a central role is played by the tensor transformation rules
where the metric tensor matrix elements gij ≡ ei ⋅ ej, and the momentum operator pi acting to the right on a spatial wavefunction ψ, piψ ≡ −igij∂jψ. These transformation rules allow us to, for instance, convert a system written in terms of the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) into the curvilinear qi coordinates.
Our prescription for obtaining the Hamiltonian for our two-dimensional curved surface is as follows: We first start from the Hamiltonian for a three-dimensional system Eq. 1, and apply the tensor transformation rules Eqs 2 to 4 to rewrite the Hamitonian in terms of the curvilinear qi coordinates. We then conceptually introduce a confining potential along the local surface normal direction, so that the particles are confined to q3 = 0, i.e. on the two-dimensional surface itself. This gives the effective Hamiltonian
where m0 is the rest mass of the electron, g(q1, q2) is the reduced metric tensor, and α is the Weingarten curvature matrix26. The indices m, n = (1, 2), and other index values range from 1 to 3. We emphasize that the confinement along the normal direction of the curved system will induce the curvature-controllable geometric potentials \(-\frac{1}{8{m}_{0}}[{\rm{Tr}}{(\alpha )}^{2}-4{\rm{Det}}(\alpha )]\) and \(\frac{1}{2}i{S}_{i3}{\sigma }^{i}{\rm{Tr}}(\alpha ))\psi \). The derivation of Eq. 5 is detailed in the Methods section.
For notational simplicity, let us introduce \({v}_{\mathrm{(2)}}\equiv \frac{1}{4}{\rm{Tr}}{({\alpha }_{m}^{n})}^{2}-4{\rm{Det}}({\alpha }_{m}^{n})\), \({v}_{\mathrm{(1)}}\equiv \frac{1}{2}{\rm{Tr}}({\alpha }_{m}^{n})\), and \({\partial }_{i}\equiv \frac{\partial }{\partial {q}^{i}}\), so that Eq. 5 can now be more concisely written as
A 2D System with Sinusoidal Periodicity
Now let us consider a periodically curved system, such as the one illustrated in Fig. 1 where the spin σ represents an orbital degree of freedom. We note in passing that a similar system has been studied in27 where the bulk of their results were obtained using a lattice Hamiltonian, whereas we study a continuum system here. By the Bloch theorem, an eigenstate of the system takes the form of \(\psi (\overrightarrow{q})=\exp (i{k}_{i}{q}^{i})u(\overrightarrow{r})\) where u is a periodic function with the same periodicity as the system. Consider an eigenstate with energy E. Using the alternative form of the curvilinear Laplacian operator \({\nabla }^{2}=({\partial }_{i}+({\partial }_{i}\,\mathrm{ln}\,\sqrt{g})){g}^{ij}{\partial }_{j}={\nabla }_{i}({g}^{ij}{\partial }_{j})\) where \({\nabla }_{i}\equiv ({\partial }_{i}+({\partial }_{i}\,\mathrm{ln}\,\sqrt{g}))\) we have
We may therefore take the terms acting on u in the left hand side of Eq. 7 as an effective Hamiltonian, Hu, for the periodic part of the Bloch state |u〉.
One consequence of having a periodic curvature is that the periodicity leads to the emergence of Brillouin zones, where the dispersion relations for all values of the crystal momentum \(\overrightarrow{k}\) can be folded back into the first Brillouin zone. This folding emerges automatically in numerical calculations of the bandstructure involving the Bloch theorem, as we shall see. To familiarise the reader with the folding of the dispersion relation into the first Brillouin zone, let us first consider the dispersion of an isotropic, translation invariant system. Such a system can be considered to be a periodic system with an arbitrary period. Consider for example a dispersion relation of E = k2/(2m) ± βk. Figure 2 demonstrates how the dispersion relation is folded from the extended zone scheme, in which k extends to infinity, to the reduced zone scheme in which k is now limited to the first Brillouin zone. Multiple energy bands which exhibit both particle-like (positive \({\partial }_{k}^{2}E\)) as well as hole-like (negative \({\partial }_{k}^{2}E\)) dispersion relations now emerge.
For the numerical results which follow, we consider a sinusoidally periodic curved surface shown in Fig. 1 which, for simplicity, is taken to be translation invariant along the q2 direction. A point lying on the surface is given by (x, y, z) = (q1, q2, z0sin(2πq1/L)) where L is the spatial periodicity. Following the Bloch scheme described above, the translation invariance along the q2 direction leads to an eigenstate of the system of the form ψ = exp(i(k1q1 + k2q2))u(q1) where u(q1) has the same spatial periodicity as the curved surface. u(q1) can therefore be expanded in terms of a Fourier series
Substituting Eq. 8 into Eq. 7 gives
Note that in Eq. 9 the integration on both sides of the equal sign carries an additional factor of \(\sqrt{g}\) due to the curvature of the system. This \(\sqrt{g}\) factor is necessary in the definition of the matrix elements between two arbitrary states |Ψ〉 and |Φ〉, i.e. for an arbitrary Hermitian operator O, we have \(\langle \Psi |O|{\rm{\Phi }}\rangle \equiv \int {\rm{d}}{q}^{1}\,\sqrt{g}{{\rm{\Psi }}}^{\ast }O{\rm{\Phi }}\), so that the Hermiticity condition 〈Ψ|O|Φ〉* = 〈Φ|O|Ψ〉 is satisfied. In our numerical calculations, we expand Eq. 9 in terms of a sufficiently large number, nmax, of exp(2inπ/L) basis modes sufficient to achieve convergence. Given the values of k1 and k2, we construct two 2nmax × 2nmax matrices which we denote as \(\tilde{{\bf{H}}}\) and \(\tilde{{\bf{A}}}\) from the left and right sides of the equal sign in Eq. 9 respectively by running the columns of the matrices over the n summation index and the rows over the m summation index. The additional factor of 2 in 2nmax comes from the spin degree of freedom. Eq. 9 then gives the generalized eigenvalue problem \(\tilde{{\bf{H}}}{\rm{c}}=E\tilde{{\bf{A}}}{\rm{c}}\) which can be numerically solved to give the eigenvalues E and the eigenvectors c, which represent the column vectors of the cn coefficients. (On a flat system where \(\sqrt{g}=1\) everywhere, \(\tilde{{\bf{A}}}\) reduces to an identity matrix.)
Figure 3 shows the dispersion relations for the lowest-energy bands at k2 = 0 for two SOI systems where the Hamiltonians for the three-dimensional systems take the form of \(H={p}^{2}\mathrm{/(2}m)+\alpha \overrightarrow{p}\cdot \overrightarrow{\sigma }\), i.e. Sij = αgij. We used the numerical values α = 0.1 eVÅ, m = 6.94 × 10−30 kg and L = 500 Å in our calculations. We have shown only the dispersion relations for positive values of k1 as the dispersion relations are symmetric about k1 = 0.
The dispersion relation shows the two-fold Kramers’ degeneracy at the Time-Reversal Invariant Points (TRIMs) at k1 = 0 and k1 = π/L. The dispersion relation for the less curved system in panel (a) resembles that of the flat system in Fig. 2b where a particle-like band with a positive \(({\rm{sign}}({k}_{1}){\partial }_{{k}_{1}}E)\) is degenerate with a hole-like band with a negative \(({\rm{sign}}({k}_{1}){\partial }_{{k}_{1}}E)\) at the TRIMs at k1 = 0, ±π/L. Increased curvature leads to a scenario similar to that in panel (b) where the bands now ‘switch partners’ and particle-like (hole-like) bands pair with particle-like (hole-like) bands at the TRIMs. Band gaps, i.e. energy ranges without propagating states, now emerge at k2 = 0.
While the partner switching and band gap opening are somewhat reminiscent of a topological phase transition in topological insulators, the Hamiltonian of Eq. 1 does not yet support topological phase transitions. This can be seen from the fact that the opening of the band gaps in panel (b) of Fig. 3 does not result in the emergence of topological edge states when an edge is introduced into the system.
Curvature-Controllable Quantum Phase Transitions with SOC
We will now turn our attention to a Hamiltonian in which a topological phase transition can be induced by the curvature. A topological insulator (TI) is a new state of quantum matter with an insulating bulk and a topologically protected conducting surface24,25,28,29,30,31. Bernevig, Hughes and Zhang (BHZ) introduced the Hamiltonian
to describe a quantum-well (QW) system on the xy plane hosting a two-dimensional topological insulator state24. Here, the σ s are Pauli matrices referring to an orbital degree of freedom, the sz is the z Pauli matrix referring to the real spin degree of freedom, k∥ is a vector on the xy plane, and A, B, M and D are quantum-well dependent parameters. The term containing sz represents a spin orbit coupling term. (We have dropped a term corresponding to a shift of the energy origin). Notice that in this Hamiltonian the two real spin orientations are decoupled to each other, so we may consider just a single real spin and get the corresponding results for the other spin by applying time reversal. We thus consider the real spin up. For our numerical calculations, we use the numerical values of A = −5 eVÅ2, B = −20 eVÅ2 and D = 0.5 eVÅ2 which are rounded values approximately equal in magnitude to those for the HgTe quantum well system in the original BHZ paper.
With A, B and D fixed, a phase transition occurs when the value of M changes sign. Panel (a) of Fig. 4 shows the variation with the parameter M of the energies of the energy bands at k = 0 of a flat QW. (More than two bands appear in the figure because of the folding of the energy bands into the first Brillouin zone.) The two bands just above and below E = 0 are the conduction and valence bands respectively. As M is gradually increased from a large negative value, the energy separation between the two bands shrinks until it reaches zero. The bands then cross each other as M is increased further. The gap closing and subsequent band crossing at M = 0 corresponds to a quantum phase transition from a topologically non-trivial state to a trivial state.
We now consider the corresponding case for a curved QW system. In order to describe a curved surface, let us first extend Eq. 10 to three dimensions with the replacement of k∥ with \(-{\nabla }_{\mathrm{(3)}}^{2}\) where the subscript (3) indicates that this is the Laplacian operator in three dimensions. We then confine the resulting Hamiltonian to our desired curved two-dimensional surface similar to what we did in the previous section. This gives
where v(1) and v(2) are as defined in the text before Eq. 5.
The introduction of a curvature can shift the value of M at which the phase transition occurs. Panel (b) of Fig. 4 shows that in a curved structure the band crossing point is shifted away from M = 0 towards a small positive value of M. This shift can be intuitively understood in the following manner: In the Hamiltonian of a flat system Eq. 10, M is the momentum-independent term which appears together with σz. In the Hamiltonian for the curved system Eq. 11, there is an additional momentum-independent term Bv(2)σz which is associated with σz. The phase transition is therefore controlled by the sign of (M + Bv(2)) rather than that of M alone. For curved surfaces of the form (x, y, z) = (q1, q2, z(q1)), v(2) is always negative. This accounts for the small positive value of M at the transition point.
To gain another perspective on the controllability of the phase transition by the curvature, we now fix the value of M and vary z0, the amplitude of the sinusoidal variation instead. Panel (a) of Fig. 5 shows that as the curvature is increased from 0, the energy separation between the conduction and valence bands shrinks until the bands cross each other at a critical value of curvature, and a band inversion occurs. This band inversion is associated with a topological phase transition. When an interface to a topologically trivial material is introduced, here by imposing a hard wall potential at q2 = 0 and making the system a semi-infinite one extending from q2 = −∞ to q2 = 0, surface states localized near the interface emerge only on one side of band inversion (panel (c)) and not the other (panel (b)). A detailed account of how the surface states are obtained is provided in the Methods section. The fact that the states which emerge in the bulk band gap are surface states for the more curved structures can be ascertained by verifying that the density distribution of these topological surface states decay exponentially away from the surface (panel (d)) unlike the topologically trivial bulk states (panel (e)) which show a standing wave pattern.
Conclusion
In this work, we first showed the derivation of the Hamiltonian for a generic curved nanostructure. We next introduced a numerical scheme to calculate the bandstructure of a a periodically curved nanostructure. Using the Hamiltonian we derived, we showed that introducing curvature into a two-dimensional system can open up band gaps and lead to partner switching at the TRIMs. We then studied the BHZ Hamiltonian for a two-dimensional quantum well. We demonstrated that a quantum phase transition from a topologically trivial phase to a non-trivial phase can be induced by introducing a curvature.
Methods
Dimensional reduction
Let us consider an arbitrary operator O in a three-dimensional system in which we do not confine the system to lie on the two-dimensional system yet, and denote the determinant of the three-dimensional metric tensor with an upper case G, and the determinant of the two-dimensional surface as a lower case g. We denote the three-dimensonal wavefunction \({\mathscr{X}}\)(q1, q2, q3) = \({\mathscr{X}}\)t(q1, q2)\({\mathscr{X}}\)n(q3). Consider the expectation value of O over an infinitesimal volume element
This suggests that we should identify the effective wavefunction on the two-dimensional surface, ψ, as \(\psi =\sqrt{f}{{\mathscr{X}}}_{t},f\equiv {(\frac{G}{g})}^{\mathrm{1/2}}\) as the effective wavefunction on the two-dimensional surface. Consequently, we have \({{\mathscr{X}}}_{t}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{f}}\psi \) so that substituting this into the pipi operator gives
where \({\tilde{\nabla }}_{\mathrm{(2)}}^{2}\equiv {\sum }_{i,j}^{2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{G}}{\partial }_{i}(\sqrt{G}{G}^{ij}{\partial }_{j})\). This differs from the non-tilde version of \({\nabla }_{\mathrm{(2)}}^{2}\) in Eq. 11 in that the metric tensors and metric tensor matrix elements that appear in the \({\tilde{\nabla }}_{\mathrm{(2)}}^{2}\) are the three-dimensional metric tensors, which have q3 dependence, while \({\nabla }_{\mathrm{(2)}}^{2}\) is the Laplacian operator on the two-dimensional surface where q3 is fixed to 0. We take it as a given that
Setting q3 = 0 so that we are only considering states confined to our surface and dropping the q3 derivatives of ψ gives
Similarly, we have
Surface states
In our numerical calculations we conceptually truncate the system at q2 = 0 so that instead of extending from q2 = −∞ to q2 = ∞ the surface now extends from q2 = −∞ to q2 = 0. The wavevector k1 is still a good quantum number. An eigenstate of the semi-infinite system for a given value of k1 and energy E, if it exists, can be written as a linear combination of the infinite length eigenstates subjected to the boundary condition that the wavefunction vanishes at q2 = 0.
Let us therefore describe how we numerically obtain the infinite-length eigenstates when the energy E and k1 are given. Using a similar scheme to that outlined in the discussion surrounding Eq. 9, we construct a 2nmax × 2nmax numerical matrix representation of the Hamiltonian Eq. 11, H. We have
In going from Eq. 17 to Eq. 18 we decomposed H into a part independent of k2, H(0), a part linear in k2, H(1)k2 and a part quadratic in k2, H(2)(k2)2. Eq. 19 is a rewriting of Eq. 18 into a generalized eigenvalue problem where the eigenvalues are the k2 s and the eigenvectors (c,k2c)T. Since the block matrices in Eq. 19 are 4nmax × 4nmax matrices, there are 4nmax eigenvectors and corresponding values of k2. The k2 s may, in general, be complex.
One consequence of introducing the boundary is that evanescent states with complex q2 wavevectors may now be admissible in the system if the imaginary parts of the wavevectors are negative, so that these states decay away exponentially away from the surface. (Evanescent states cannot exist in the infinitely long system since they will blow up exponentially at either q2 = ∞ or q2 = −∞). The allowed states in our semi-infinite systems are therefore those with real values of k2, and those where the imaginary parts of k2 are negative. Depending on the given values of E and k1, the number of allowed states may range from 2nnmax, where all the k2 values have imaginary parts, to 4nnmax. On the other hand, the boundary condition that the wavefunction vanishes at q2 = 0 imposes 2nnmax constraints. It is always possible to find a non-trivial linear combination of vectors which sum up to zero when the number of vectors to choose from is more than the dimensionality of the vectors. Eigenstates for the semi-infinite system therefore exist when the the number of allowed infinite-length eigenstates exceeds 2nnmax.
For the case when the number of allowed infinite-length eigenstates is exactly 2nnmax, we construct a 2nmax × 2nmax matrix V whose columns consist of the allowed eigenstates. A linear combination of eigenstates which satisfies the boundary condition exists if and only if the determinant of V is zero.
References
Bojowald, M. Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5227 (2001).
Hořava, P. Spectral Dimension of the Universe in Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 161301 (2009).
Lü, H. & Pope, C. N. Critical Gravity in Four Dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 181302 (2011).
R. da Costa, C. T. Quantum mechanics of a constrained particle. Phys. Rev. A 23, 1982 (1981).
J. Chang, J.-Y., Wu, J.-S. & Chang, C.-R. Exact Hamiltonians with Rashba and cubic Dresselhaus spin-orbit couplings on a curved surface. Phys. Rev. B 87, 174413 (2013).
Ferrari, G. & Cuoghi, G. Schrödinger Equation for a Particle on a Curved Surface in an Electric and Magnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 230403 (2008).
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properites of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
Huertas-Hernando, D., Guinea, F. & Brataas, A. Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nanotubes and nanotube caps. Phys. Rev. B 74, 155426 (2006).
Jeong, J.-S., Shin, J. & Lee, H.-W. Curvature-induced spin-orbit coupling and spin relaxation in a chemically clean single-layer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195457 (2011).
Meijer, F. E., Morpurgo, A. F. & Klapwijk, T. M. One-dimensional ring in the presence of Rashba spin-orbit interaction: Derivation of the correct Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. B 66, 033107 (2002).
Liu, M.-H., Wu, J.-S., Chen, S.-H. & Chang, C.-R. Spin and charge trasnport in U-shaped one-dimensional channels with spin-orbit couplings. Phys. Rev. B 84, 085307 (2011).
Chang, C.-H., van den Brink, J. & Ortix, C. Strongly Anisotropic Ballistic Magnetoresistance in Compact Three-Dimensional Semiconducting Nanoarchitectures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 227205 (2014).
Schwaiger, S. et al. Rolled-up Thrree-Dimensional Metamaterials with a Tunable Rashba Frequency in thee Visible Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 163903 (2009).
Kuemmeth, F., Ilani, S., Ralph, D. C. & McEuen, P. L. Coupling of spin and orbital motion of electrons in carbon nanotubes. Nature 452, 448 (2008).
Georgiou, T. et al. Graphene bubbles with controllable curvature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 093103 (2011).
Levy, N. et al. Strain-induced Pseudo-Magnetic Fields Greater Than 300 Tesla in Graphene Nanobubbles. Science 329, 544 (2010).
Yan, W. et al. Strain and curvature induced evolution of electronic band structures in twisted graphene bilayer. Nature Commun. 4, 2159 (2013).
Siu, Z. B., Jalil, M. B. A. & Tan, S. G. Semicircular Rashba arc spin polarizer. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 17C513 (2014).
Siu, Z. B., Jalil, M. B. A. & Tan, S. G. Curvature induced out-of-plane spin accumulation in Rashba quantum waveguides. J. Appl. Phys. 121, 233902 (2014).
Sachdev S. Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University, 1999).
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W. & Bloch, I. Quantum phase transitions from a superfluid to a Mott insulaor in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39 (2002).
Baumann, K., Guerlin, C., Brennecke, F. & Esslinger, T. Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity. Nature 464, 1301 (2010).
Heyl, M., Polkovnikov, A. & Kehrein, S. Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135704 (2013).
Bernevig, B. A., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells. Science 314, 1757 (2006).
Konig, M. et al. Quantum Spin Hall Insulator State in HgTe Quantum Wells. Science 318, 766 (2007).
Gray, A. Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica (CRC Press, 1997).
Gentile, P., Cuoco, M. & Ortix, C. Edge States and Toplogical Insulating Phases Genereated by Curving a Nanowire with Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 256801 (2015).
Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Z 2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).
Lu, H. Z., Shan, W. Y., Yao, W., Niu, Q. & Shen, S. Q. Massive Dirac fermions and spin physics in an ultrathin film of topological insulator. Phys. Rev. B 81, 115407 (2010).
Yu, R. et al. Quantized Anamolous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators. Science 329, 61 (2010).
Chang, C.-Z. et al. Experimetnal Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator. Science 340, 167 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank W.-C. Chien for his help with the manuscript. This work is supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF), Prime Minister’s Office, under its Competitive Research Programme (NRF CRP12-2013-01, NUS Grant No. R-263-000-B30-281), the MOE-AcRF Tier-II grant MOE2015-T2-1-099 (NUS Grant No. R-380-000-012-112) and the Minister of Science and Technology of R. O. C. with the project no. 107-2112-M-002-013-MY3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.B.S. and J.-Y.C. performed most of the derivations and calculations. S.G.T., M.B.A.J. and C.-R.C. contributed to the discussion and analysis of the results. All authors wrote and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Siu, Z.B., Chang, JY., Tan, S.G. et al. Curvature induced quantum phase transitions in an electron-hole system. Sci Rep 8, 16497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34903-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34903-9
- Springer Nature Limited