Abstract
Spermatogenesis is a dynamic developmental process in which spermatogonial stem cells proliferate, differentiate and mature into functional spermatozoa. These processes require an accurate gene regulation network. Here, we investigated the dynamic changes that occur during spermatogenesis through a combination of histological and transcriptome analyses of different developmental stages of the testis. We constructed 18 testis transcriptome libraries, and the average length, N50, and GC content of the unigenes were 1,795 bp; 3,240 bp and 49.25%, respectively. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were related to germ cell proliferation and maturation, such as NANOS3, RARs, KIFs, steroid hormone synthesis-related genes and receptor genes, were identified between pairs of testis at different developmental stages. Gene ontology annotation and pathway analyses were conducted on DEGs with specific expression patterns involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis. Nine important pathways such as steroid hormone biosynthesis related to spermatogenesis were identified. A total of 21 modules that ranged from 49 to 7,448 genes were designed by a weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Furthermore, a total of 83 candidate miRNA were identified by computational methods. Our study provides the first transcriptomic evidence for differences in gene expression between different developmental stages of spermatogenesis in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Fish are the most diverse and abundant group of vertebrates. However, our knowledge about spermatogenesis in teleosts is limited to a few species that are used in basic research and/or aquaculture biotechnology1. In general, spermatogenesis is a complex developmental process wherein spermatogonia undergo a mitotic phase (the renewal of spermatogonial stem cells and mitotic proliferation of spermatogonia) and spermatocytes undergo meiosis and differentiate into spermatozoa. In adult testes, the balance between proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells is critical for the continuous production of male gametes. Drastic remoulding process occur from the spermatid, the initial haploid cell, to functional spermatozoa. Special structures take shape; the nucleus is condensed, and the cytoplasm and most organelles are discarded during spermiogenesis2.
Genes and steroid hormones coordinate the spermatogenesis process. However, detailed information about the genes and pathways that regulate the proliferation and maturation of male germ cells, especially at certain developmental stages, is lacking. During the early spermatogenesis period, mitosis of the spermatogonia and meiosis of the spermatocyte are accompanied by a cytoskeleton rearrangement. At these stages, the genes and pathways involved in cell signalling and cell division, such as MAPs, regulate male germ cell proliferation. Steroid hormones, such as progestogens, androgens and oestrogens show important variations during male gonad maturation. They are important regulators of spermatogenesis progression, from spermatogonial stem cell renewal to sperm maturation1.
With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies in recent years, gene expression patterns and their possible physiological functions in specific tissues at specific developmental stages at the transcriptomic level have been able to explored3. For example, during human spermatogenesis, transcriptomic dynamics can help predict the potential key genes that regulate male gamete generation4; in different boar breeds, transcriptome analyses revealed differences in the development of sexual function5 and in yellow catfish, comparative transcriptome analyses highlighted differences in expressed genes and signalling pathways between XY and YY testes6. However, information related to spermatogenesis during the different developmental stages in teleosts is limited.
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus, Scophthalmidae, Pleuronectiformes) is an economically important marine economic flatfish species in Europe and China. Recent studies have undertaken the large-scale transcriptome profiling of turbot to identify candidate genes involved in immunity, sex differentiation, sex differences and growth7,8,9,10. The probable roles of those predicted genes and pathways in turbot reproduction were also discussed. However, the types of male germ cells in the developing testis were different at different stages. Thus, the molecular mechanisms for male germ cell proliferation and maturation needs to be clarified. Further, the gene and signalling pathways for spermatogenesis and spermiogenesis are currently lacking.
The aims of the present study were to assess the transcriptome and the gene expression dynamics of six developmental stages of turbot ranging from MSII to MSVI and to identify pivotal differentially expressed genes (DEGs), gene families, and miRNA that may regulate spermatogenesis. The present study will provide useful information for the exploration of possible spermatogenesis mechanisms at the molecular level for marine fish species.
Results
Histological analysis of turbot male germ cells during spermatogenesis
A haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain analysis was conducted to understand the proliferation and maturation processes of male germ cells during testis development. Testis tissues were collected at the following different reproductive stages: MSII, MSIII, MSIII-MSIV, MSIV, MSV and MSVI. Morphological observations of the testes and male germ cell structural features are shown in Fig. 1. Spermatogenesis produced cysts and the germ cells of each cyst were in synchronous development. The type and number of germ cells per cyst changed from the MSII to MSVI stages. The histological developmental stage was determined according to the characteristics and ratios of male germ cells. Male germ cell proliferation mainly occurred at MSII and MSIII stages. At the MSII stage, the germ cells included spermatogonium (26.10%) and primary spermatocyte (48.95%) cells. The MSIII stage was the initiation stage of the gonad annual breeding cycle, during which the germ cells demonstrated a higher proliferative activity, including mitosis and meiosis. At this stage, the germ cells were spermatogonium (15.06%), primary spermatocytes (53.87%), secondary spermatocytes (15.03%) and other spermatids (15.87%). At the MSIV stage, most spermatocytes had developed into spermatids, and some of the spermatids had developed into spermatozoa, which then matured and hydrated at the MSV stage. The MSVI stage was the testis recession stage where the germ cell types were mainly primary spermatocyte (63.10%). At the MSVI stage, the ratios of different germ cell types were similar to each other but different compared to the MSIII stage (Table 1).
Histological observation of testis at different stages. At stage II (MSII), the major spermatogenic cells were spermatogonium and primary spermatocyte while spermatozoa and spermatid were not found. At stage III, spermatogonia reduced and spermatocyte increased compared to MSII. This is the initiation stage of the annual breeding cycle. Stage III–IV of the testis is the transitional phase. Stage IV is the spermiogenesis stage and there was an increase in the proportion of spermatid. Stage V is the spawning phase and spermatozoa account for the principal parts. Stage VI is testis recession phase, wherein primary spermatocytes were the major cell type. a,b: MSII, e,f: MSIII, i,j: MSIII-MSIV, n,o: MSIV, r,s: MSV, v,w: MSVI. sg, spermatogonium; ps, primary spermatocyte; ss, secondary spermatocyte; st, spermatid; sz, spermatozoon. Scale bars: a,e,i,n,r and v = 500 μm; c,d,g,h,k,l,m,p,q,t,u,x and y = 10 μm.
Sequence analysis and de novo assembly
In this study, 18 cDNA libraries (MSII, MSIII, MSIII-IV, MSIV, MSV and MSVI) were constructed using total RNA from different development stages during spermatogenesis. There were three biological replicates at each stage. To ensure that the RNA-seq data satisfied the criteria for the transcriptome analyses, we conducted standard analyses for quality control. We generated approximately 120.7 Gb bases in total after Illumina HiSeq sequencing. We then produced 132,416 unigenes after assembling all of the samples together. The total length, average length, N50, and GC content of the unigenes were 237,774,222 bp; 1,795 bp; 3,240 bp and 49.25%, respectively. Unigenes were aligned to seven functional databases to obtain possible functional information, and 85,260 (NR database: 64.39%), 103,001(NT: 77.79%), 76,504 (Swissprot: 57.78%), 37,443 (COG: 28.28%), 74,679 (KEGG: 56.40%), 7,804 (GO: 5.89%) and 60,376 (Interpro: 45.60%) unigenes were annotated.
DEGs at different stages
The differential expression of genes at different stages was analysed. The greatest number of DEGs were identified between the MSII and MSIV stages. A total of 6,952 genes were up-regulated and 2,120 genes were down-regulated from MSII to MSIV. Second, in comparisons between MSII vs. MSIII, MSII vs. MSV, MSIV vs. MSVI, MSV vs. MSVI, MSIII vs. MSV and MSIII vs. MSVI, the number of DEGs ranged from 1,885 to 3,420. The number of DEGs was lowest at MSII vs. MSVI, MSIII vs. MSIV and MSIV vs. MSV, with values ranging from 300 to 721 DEGs. A total of 1,222 genes were up-regulated and 959 genes were down-regulated from MSIII to MSV, 141 genes were up-regulated and 159 genes were down-regulated at MSV compared to MSIV, and 914 genes were up-regulated and 1,829 genes were down-regulated from MSV to MSVI (Fig. 2a). A greater number of DEGs were detected between the proliferation and maturation stages than between adjacent development stages. The screened key DEGs between the development stages that were identified in the transcriptome database are listed in Table 2 [log2 (fold) ≥4, P ≤ 0.05]. We identified 1,823 genes that were specifically expressed at the MSII stage, 3,155 at the MSIII stage, 3,970 at the MSIV stage, 2,088 at the MSV stage and 2,376 at the MSVI stage (Fig. 2b).
DEGs between the different testis developmental stages. (a) Summary of DEGs. The x-axis represents compared samples. The y-axis represents DEG numbers. The blue colour represents up-regulated DEGs and the orange colour represents down regulated DEGs. (b) Venn diagram of testicular transcripts from different reproductive phases.
During the process of the testis development cycle, at the MSIII stage, the onset of the spermatogenesis stage, germ cells multiplied greatly. The expression of kinesin and myosin were up-regulated significantly, which regulated the activity of microtubules. Steroid metabolism-related genes such as cytochrome P450 20A1 (CYP20A1), thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3 (THRAP3), oestrogen receptor beta-a (ERβ-a) and 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 14 (HSD17B14) were up-regulated significantly in the MSIII stage vs the MSII stage, and played an important role in the onset of spermatogenesis. In addition, the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), insulin receptor substrate 2-B-like (IRS2B), matrix metalloproteinase-15 (MMP15), spermatogenesis-associated protein (SPATA), autophagy-related protein (ATG) and pannexin 1 (PANX1) genes were also present at a significantly high expression level in MSIII, suggesting that they may be involved in male germ cell proliferation at spermatogenesis initiation of the annual breeding cycle. At MSV, the sperm mature stage, steroid hormone-related genes and pathways were up-regulated significantly. The STAR, testosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3 (HSD17B3), steroid 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2), luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR), follicle stimulating hormone receptor II (FSHRII), stimulated by the retinoic acid gene 6 protein (STRA6), prolactin receptor (PRLR), steroidogenic factor 1(NR5A1) and oestrogen receptor beta genes (ERβ), among others, showed obvious high expression levels at the MSV stage. The steroid hormone-related genes and pathways are mainly responsible for regulating the last stage of sperm maturation (Table 2).
Functional annotation of DEGs
We performed a gene ontology (GO) classification and functional enrichment on DEGs of different stages. In total, 190 genes that were differentially expressed between the MSII and MSIII stages were assigned molecular functions (180 terms), followed by 174 DEGs that were assigned biological processes (621 terms) and 144 that were assigned cellular components (91 terms) (Fig. 3a). A total of 892 GO terms were assigned to DEGs from the MSII vs MSIII stage comparison. The GO analysis revealed transcripts related to specific processes such as cilium (GO:0005929), cilium organisation (GO:0044782) and Kupffer’s vesicle development (GO:0070121) in MSII vs MSIII. Consistently, DEGs between MSII and MSIII were also enriched in male germ cell proliferation processes such as the regulation of cell division (GO:0051302), regulation of mitotic cell cycle (GO:0007346), regulation of cell proliferation (GO:0042127), germ cell development (GO:0007281), spermatogenesis (GO:0007283) and male gamete generation (GO:0048232). Furthermore, a total of 146 DEGs between MSIII and MSV were assigned molecular functions (189 terms) followed by 146 DEGs assigned biological processes (581 terms) and 133 assigned cellular components (95 terms) (Fig. 3b). In total, 865 GO terms were identified for genes that were differentially expressed between the MSIII and MSV stages. GO analysis between MSIII and MSV uncovered genes related to the cytoskeleton such as microtubule cytoskeleton (GO:0015630), microtubule motor activity (GO:0003777), Kupffer’s vesicle development (GO:0070121), cilium assembly (GO:0042384) and cilium morphogenesis (GO:0060271) genes. GO terms related to steroid metabolism such as steroid hydroxylase activity (GO:0008395), 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone aldolase activity (GO:0047442), steroid hormone receptor activity (GO:0003707), progesterone metabolic process (GO:0042448), steroid metabolic process (GO:0008202), steroid hormone mediated signalling pathway (GO:0043401) and cellular response to steroid hormone stimulus (GO:0071383) play important roles in male cell maturation (Supplementary Table S1).
The pathway analysis with the KEGG pathway mapping database provided information on common pathways involved in spermatogenesis. In this study, nine important pathways (steroid hormone biosynthesis, ovarian steroidogenesis, prolactin, TGF-beta, Wnt, GnRH, mTOR, oestrogen and p53 signalling pathways) related to male germ cell proliferation and maturation were identified (Table 3). GO and KEGG annotations were helpful for identifying potential genes related to developmental processes.
Validation of DEGs with quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
To evaluate our DEG library, the expression levels of six DEGs, which were primarily involved in spermatogenesis, were analysed by qRT-PCR. Fig. 4 shows the qRT-PCR results, which reflect the same expression trends that were observed through the RNA-seq analysis.
Validation of the DEGs by qRT-PCR. The expression levels of CYP20A1, LHR, KIF15, STAR, BECN1 and MNS1 during different developmental stages were detected by qRT-PCR. UBQ and RSP were used as reference genes for normalisation of qRT-PCR data. Bars represent the standard deviation (SD). The x-axis indicates the developmental stage. The y-axis shows the relative expression level of genes. Note: The parameters tested were determined using one-way ANOVA and identified using the SNK test (P < 0.05). According to SNK analysis, the letter “a” represents the relative expression levels whose mean values are relatively larger. From “a” to “d”, the mean values decrease in turn. There is no significant difference between stages with the same letter. There is a significant difference between stages with different letters, (P < 0.05).
The expression changes in the selected genes (CYP20A1, LHR, KIF15, STAR, BECN1 and MNS1) along the reproductive cycle were significantly variable (ANOVA, P < 0.05) depending on the reproductive phase. From MSII to MSIII, CYP20A1, KIF15 and MNS1 were significantly up-regulated, while LHR, STAR and BECN1 were significantly up-regulated from MSIII to MSV. These qPCR results showed a similar temporal expression pattern to the one observed following an RNA-seq analysis during the different reproductive phases.
Co-expression network analysis of DEGs
A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) with scale-free topology was applied to show co-expressed genes across the whole reproductive cycle to systematically and globally identify highly connected gene subnetworks or modules. Groups of genes exhibiting very similar patterns for each module were then detected using hierarchical clustering based on the topological overlap calculations. The expression values of the identified DEGs between different stages were considered, and a total of 21 modules were designed by using different colours in the WGCNA network. Each module had a size ranging from 49 (thistle2 module) to 7,448 genes (red module) (Fig. 5a,b). Furthermore, WGCNA was also used to identify highly correlated genes within these modules. The genes within the modules exhibited more topological overlap than the genes across the modules in the topological overlap heatmap. Modules were individually analysed for the enrichment of GO and KEGG pathways. The terms were screened by extracting those containing the reproduction-related DEGs with a fold change ≥4 and padj ≤0.05 from the modules, which was conducted to provide a biological interpretation of the constructed gene networks. For example, CYP26A1 from brown module while ER-β, IGF1, TRIP10 and MAPK4 of endocrine system from black module were identified in the gene network visualisation (Fig. 5c,d).
Co-expression network analysis of DEGs. (a) The network heatmap of selected genes. Each row and column represents a gene. The light colour indicates a low topological overlap, and a progressively darker colour indicates an increased topological overlap. (b) Hierarchical clustering dendrogram of the module eigengenes and a heatmap of the adjacencies using a weighted co-expression network analysis. (c) Visualisation of the candidate hub genes from the brown module. (d) Visualisation of the candidate hub genes from the black module. Node colour denotes differential expression levels: blue represents down-regulation, red represents up-regulation and orange represents up and down-regulation both presented. Node size represents the importance of a node. The edge denotes the interaction strength.
Identification of the genes involved in spermatogenesis and spermiogenesis
The previously reported genes related to male germ cell proliferation and maturation identified in the present study are listed in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. Members of the gene families AQP (4 isoforms), SOX (16 isoforms), and BMP (15 isoforms) and SPATA (9 isoforms) were widespread and present at high expression levels (Supplementary Table S2). In addition, androgen receptor (AR), follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), gonadal soma derived factor (GSDF), growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9), meiotic nuclear division protein 1 (MND1), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), DMRT, sperm flagellar protein 2 (SPEF2), synaptonemal complex protein 3 (SYCP3), membrane progesterone receptor alpha (PAQR7), progesterone receptor (PGR), 20beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD20B) and melatonin (MLT) have been previously reported and were also identified in the turbot testis transcriptome (Supplementary Table S3). The genes listed above were all identified in the turbot transcriptome database, though they did not present significantly different expression changes between the different stages, which suggests that they may play multiple roles in regulating the whole spermatogenesis process.
Turbot miRNA screening from RNA-seq data
A total of 83 candidate miRNAs were identified by computational methods. The sequences and structural properties of known miRNAs were used to screen the candidate miRNAs in the turbot transcriptome databases. The length range of the predicted pm-miRNAs was 18–24 bp. The number of sequences with 22 bp (51.81%) was significantly higher than others (Supplementary Fig. S1). The identified miRNAs are listed in Supplementary Tables S4. Spermatogenesis-related miRNAs, such as miR-34, miR-let-7, miR-29, miR-135, miR-449, miR-203 and so on were identified in the sm-miRNA database (Supplementary Table S4).
Discussion
In this study, we identified some key genes and pathways regulating spermatogenesis during the reproductive cycle of the testis from different development stages in turbot using histological and RNA-seq analyses. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate spermatogenesis combining male germ cell development with transcriptome in marine fish species. Previous reports related to the process of spermatogenesis in fish mainly focused on morphology descriptions, physiological studies, and the quantity and location of specific genes11,12,13. The large-scale identification of functional genes regulating testis development and spermatogenesis is limited, although omics have been used to investigate biological characteristics such as growth, immunity, sexual dimorphism and sex determination8,9,10. In the present study, we obtained many DEGs between different typical developmental stages. The differences in gene expression between MSII and MSIII, indicate that dramatic changes occurred from spermatogonium proliferation to spermatocytes meiosis. Another significant difference appeared between the MSIII and MSV stages, which indicates that significant changes occurred in the gene network for germ cell development from spermatocytes meiosis to sperm maturation.
At the MSII stage, NANOS3 (sm-NANOS3) was predominantly expressed, with spermatogonium self-renewal and differentiation noted through histological observation. Similar results were obtained in mammals and other fish species14,15. For example, in mice, NANOS3 was expressed in most undifferentiated spermatogonia (As to Aal)14, which is responsible for maintaining the undifferentiated state of spermatogonia by the control of their cell cycle16. In some teleost, such as common carp (Cyprinus carpio)17, half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis)15 and zebrafish (Dania rerio)18, NANOS3 was also expressed in germline stem cells and maintained the stem characteristics. NANOS3 might play an important role in regulating the balance of the proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonium cells.
It is well known that RA, which is regulated by the RA synthesis enzymes ALDH and degradative enzymes CYP26, binds to its receptor to regulate downstream gene expression or acts directly on the effect of gene STRA8, regulating the initiation of meiosis during sex differentiation and spermatogenesis in mammals such as mice19,20,21 and some teleost species, such as zebrafish22, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)23, and southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis)24. In turbot, some genes related to RA metabolism and its receptor were significantly up-regulated at the MSIV stage compared with the MSII stage. Meanwhile, by constructing WGCNA gene network for DEGs, CYP26A1, one of the degradative cytochrome P450 enzymes, was identified as a candidate brown module hub gene in the gene network visualisation produced by WGCNA analysis. Therefore, we speculated that RA metabolism plays an important role in the regulation of meiosis in turbot by regulating spermatogonial cells during meiosis, including the differentiation of cells to secondary spermatocytes, processes that are observed from stage II to IV. An RA signal pathway is required for germ cell meiotic initiation during spermatogenesis.
In vertebrates, sperm development and maturation are directly regulated by gonadal steroid hormone secretion. The relationship between the expression of genes encoding steroidogenic proteins and receptors for gonadotropins and testicular steroid production have not yet been comprehensively determined in male teleost25. In turbot, sperm maturation occurred at the MSV stage, and steroidogenesis enzymes and steroid hormone receptors such as STAR and LHR both showed obvious high expression levels. Furthermore, members of the ovarian steroidogenesis pathways, such as the ER were also significantly up-regulated in turbot at the MSV stage. Oestrogen (E2) has been proven to play an important role in mammals26, insects27, and fish. Oestrogen significantly influenced the maturation and differentiation of spermatocytes into spermatids26,28 and significantly enhanced the sperm fertilising capacity in vitro, inducing the acrosome reaction and sperm capacitation29 in mammals. For teleost, such as the European eel (Anguilla Anguilla)13, githead seabream (Sparus aurata)30, and rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum)31, ER have been reported to be involved in the early stages of spermatogenic cell development. The significant up-regulation of the ER and DEG enrichment in the oestrogen pathway at the MSV stage indicated the high importance of E2 in sperm maturation and hydration in turbot. Furthermore, ER-β, IGF1, TRIP10 and MAPK4 of endocrine system were identified in the gene network visualisation from black module. They may experience interaction during sperm maturation.
Kinesins have been reported to be involved in acrosomal biogenesis in the rat32, Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis)33, and lobster (Procambarus clarkia)34. In the present study, members of the kinesin gene family, such as KIF15, KIF16B, KIF20B and KIF22, showed significant differences in expression patterns. The kinesins family in turbot might participate in the dynamic cytoskeleton rearrangements of male germ cells, including mitotic and meiotic division, essential organelle transport and the biogenesis of peculiar structures, although no acrosome biogenesis in teleost sperm was observed during male germ cell proliferation, sperm maturation and fertilisation.
In addition, in this study, a total of 83 candidate sm-miRNAs, including miR-34, miR-29, miR-202 and miR-let-7, were identified by bioinformatics combining with four screen criteria. Increasing evidence demonstrates that miRNAs play an important role in various biological processes by negatively regulating target mRNA. In mammals, miR-34 is required by developing gametes and embryos and may be a potential biomarker of sperm quality, miR-20235 maintains spermatogonial stem cells by inhibiting cell cycle regulators and RNA binding proteins and miR-29 and miR-let-736 promote SSC differentiation and the meiosis process. Because of their prominent functions, hundreds of miRNAs have been identified in recent years, while only a very small number of miRNAs involved in the spermatogenesis process in teleost have been identified. Therefore, the stage-specific requirements and regulatory mechanism for particular miRNAs in spermatogenesis remain largely uncharacterised for turbot.
In conclusion, transcriptome dynamics during spermatogenesis presented in the present study provide important molecular resources to improve our understanding of the testis development process of turbot. The identification of candidate genes such as NANOS3, RARs, KIFs, steroid hormone synthesis-related genes and receptor genes, related to male germ cells proliferation and maturation of turbot might contribute to find out that their regulatory roles in testis development. In addition, further study of these predicted genes could provide useful insights into turbot male germ cells development.
Methods
Experimental fish, and sample collection
The study described in this article was conducted following the European Union (EU) Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/labanimals/legislation_en.html) and was approved by the ethical committee of the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Turbot were reared indoors in circular tanks supplied with flow-through seawater with an ambient temperature of 18 °C ± 0.5 °C and a dissolved oxygen level of ≥5 mg/ml at Shenghang Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. (Weihai, Shangdong Province, China). A photoperiod management regime in accordance with the 8L: 16D, 12L: 12D and 16L: 8D sequential order was used to control gonad development. Three samples were obtained at the same time once in two weeks.
Turbot samples were measured for total weight (±0.001 g), length (±1 mm), and gonad weight (±0.001 g). The gonadosomatic index was 100 (gonad weight/body weight). Gonads were divided in half with one lobe collected and processed for histology and one lobe collected for molecular studies and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were collected from March 2016 to July 2016 to obtain males undergoing distinct developmental stages of the reproductive cycle (Stage–Stage). Stage II testes were collected from 11-month-old males. Approximately 32 males aged between 11 months old (0.38–0.42 kg) and the breeding stage were selected. Testes were excised and examined by anatomical and histological methods to determine their developmental stages.
Light microscope observation and statistical analysis
A testis lobe from each fish was fixed in Bouin’s solution for 24 h, dehydrated in a series of ethanol, clarified in xylene and embedded in paraffin. The tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned with a microtome (Leica RM 2155) at 3 μm thicknesses. All tissue sections were stained with HE. Images were captured by a Nikon Ni-E microscope equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri2 imaging system. All sections from each male fish were examined in a random fashion. Each cell type (spermatogonia, spermatocyte, spermatid, and spermatozoa) at each section of the border and inside of the cyst was scored and five random images per fish were analysed.
Construction and sequencing of cDNA libraries
Total RNA for each sample was extracted with integrity, and the size distributions of the RNA samples were verified using an Agilent 2200 Bioanalyer (Agilent Technologies, Germany). Samples with an RNA Integrity Number ≥8.0 were used for cDNA library preparation. The concentration of RNA in each extracted sample was measured.
cDNA libraries were constructed for each RNA sample and 18 samples and 18 libraries were sequenced. During the QC step, an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System were used to quantify and qualify the sample library. Then, the library underwent paired-end sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq X-Ten. After sequencing, we received raw reads and filtered out any reads that had low-quality scores, were adaptor-polluted or had a high content of unknown bases (N) to produce clean reads. The specific parameters for raw reads filtering as follows: remove reads with adaptors; remove reads in which unknown bases(N) comprise >5%; remove low-quality reads (we define a low-quality read as the percentage of base which quality is lesser than 15 is greater than 20% in a read). After filtering, the remaining reads are termed ‘clean reads’. Next, a de novo assembly was run with the clean reads to obtain unigenes.
Analysis of the transcriptome results
The clean reads were assembled into non-redundant transcripts using the assembler Trinity37, which has been developed specifically for the de novo assembly of transcriptomes using short reads. Then, the transcripts were clustered to Unigenes with Tgicl38. The Unigenes were used for Basic Local Assignment Search Tool (BLAST) searches and annotation against the NT, NR, COG, KEGG and SwissProt databases39. Blast version, v2.2.23; parameters, default; website: http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi. Functional annotation with GO terms (www.geneontology.org) was performed with the Blast2GO software40. Blast2GO version, v2.5.0; parameters, default; website: http://www.blast2go.com. The InterPro annotation was performed using InterProScan5 software41. InterProScan5 version, v5.11-51.0; parameters, default; website: http://code.google.com/p/interproscan/wiki/Introduction. The clean reads were mapped to the unigenes using Bowtie242, and then gene expression levels were calculated with RSEM43. Bowtie2 version, v2.2.5; parameters, -q–phred64–sensitive–dpad0–gbar99999999–mp1,1–np1–score-minL,0,-0.1-I1-X1000–no-mixed–no-discordant -p1-k200; website: http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/ Bowtie2 /index.shtml. RSEM version, v1.2.12; parameters, default; website:
http://deweylab.biostat.wisc.edu/ RSEM. The gene expression levels were counted as FPKM. We detected DEGs with DEseq244. DEseq2: parameters, fold change ≥2.00 and adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05.
qRT-PCR validation of the DEGs
Six genes (CYP20A1, LHR, KIF15, STAR, BECN1 and MNS1) were chosen for confirmation of DEG data by qRT-PCR. The experiments used SYBR Green (Takara, Dalian, China) detection in a CFX Connect Real-time System (Applied Biosystems, BIORAD, USA). The UBQ and RSP genes were used as reference genes in these experiments45. Relative gene expression data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method. All reactions were carried out in triplicate.
WGCNA
A gene co-expression network was constructed using the WGCNA method, which was implemented with the WGCNA package in R46.
Reproduction-related genes during spermatogenesis identified from transcriptome sequences
The identification of homologous unigenes with spermatogenesis-related proteins was carried out by searching the key words of reported proteins in BLASTX alignment results with the databases mentioned above. The identification of key unigenes that regulate male germ cell proliferation and maturation during different development stages was based on the differential expression results.
Bioinformatics prediction of miRNAs from transcriptome sequences
Sequences used for sm-miRNA prediction were derived from a local BLAST search that compared the turbot transcriptome database with the miRNA hairpin database. The procedures for searching for candidate sm-miRNA were performed, as previously reported, with some modification (evalue = 1e-5)47.
Availability of Data
Sequence data generated for the present study has been deposited to NCBI Short Read Archive. The SRA ID assigned is: SRP136753.
References
Schulz, R. W. et al. Spermatogenesis in fish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 165, 390–411 (2010).
Zhu, Z. J., Yang, S. & Li, Z. Transcriptome research on spermatogenic molecular drive in mammals. Asian J Androl. 17, 961–971 (2015).
Li, G. L. & Qian, H. Transcriptome using Illumina sequencing reveals the traits of spermatogenesis and developing testes in Eriocheir sinensis. PLoS One. 12, e0172478 (2017).
Zhu, Z. J. et al. Dynamics of the transcriptome during human spermatogenesis: predicting the potential key genes regulating male gametes generation. Sci. Rep. 6, 19069 (2016).
Ding, H. S., Luo, Y., Liu, M., Huang, J. S. & Xu, D. Q. Histological and transcriptome analyses of testes from Duroc and Meishan boars. Sci. Rep. 6, 20758 (2016).
Wu, J. J. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes and signaling pathways between XY and YY testis in yellow catfish. PLoS One. 10, e0134626 (2015).
Hu, Y. L., Huang, M., Wang, W. J., Guan, J. T. & Kong, J. Characterization of gonadal transcriptomes from the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Genome. 59, 1–10 (2016).
Ma, D. Y. et al. Transcriptome analysis for identification of genes related to gonad differentiation, growth, immune response and marker discovery in the Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). PLoS One. 11, e0149414 (2016).
Ribas, L. et al. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of the process of gonadal sex differentiation in the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 422, 132–149 (2016).
Robledo, D. et al. Integrative Transcriptome, Genome and quantitative trait loci resources identify single nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes for growth traits in Turbot. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 243 (2016).
Valero, Y. et al. Characterization of the annual regulation of reproductive and immune parameters on the testis of European sea bass. Cell Tissue Res. 362, 215–229 (2015).
Feng, C. C. et al. Progestin is important for testicular development of male turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) during the annual reproductive cycle through functionally distinct progestin receptors. Fish Physiol Biochem. 44, 35–48 (2018).
Morini, M. et al. The expression of nuclear and membrane estrogen receptors in the European eel throughout spermatogenesis. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 203, 91–99 (2017).
Suzuki, H., Sada, A., Yoshida, S. & Saga, Y. The heterogeneity of spermatogonia is revealed by their topology and expression of marker proteins including the germ cell-specific proteins Nanos2 and Nanos3. Dev. Biol. 336, 222–231 (2009).
Huang, J. Q., Li, Y. J., Shao, C. W., Wang, N. & Chen, S. L. Identification, characterization and functional analysis of regulatory region of nanos gene from half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Gene. 617, 8–16 (2017).
Lolicato, F. et al. Potential role of Nanos3 in maintaining the undifferentiated spermatogonia population. Dev Biol. 313, 725–738 (2008).
Su, B. F. et al. Expression and knockdown of primordial germ cell genes, vasa, nanos and dead end in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) embryos for transgenic sterilization and reduced sexual maturity. Aquaculture. 420, S72–S84 (2013).
Beer, R. L. & Draper, B. W. nanos3 maintains germline stem cells and expression of the conserved germline stem cell gene nanos2 in the zebrafish ovary. Dev. Biol. 374, 308–318 (2013).
Endo, T. et al. Periodic retinoic acid–STRA8 signaling intersects with periodic germ-cell competencies to regulate spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E2347–E2356 (2015).
Koubova, J. et al. Retinoic acid activates two pathways required for meiosis in Mice. Plos Genetics 10, e1004541 (2014).
Griswold, M. D., Hogarth, C. A., Bowles, J. & Koopman, P. Initiating meiosis: the case for retinoic acid. Biol Reprod. 86, 35 (2012).
Pradhan, A. & Olsson, P. E. Inhibition of retinoic acid synthesis disrupts spermatogenesis and fecundity in zebrafish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 217, 81–91 (2015).
Feng, R. J. et al. Retinoic acid homeostasis through aldh1a2 and cyp26a1 mediates meiotic entry in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Sci. Rep. 5, 10131 (2015).
Dong, R. R. Characterization of Stra8 in Southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis): evidence for its role in meiotic initiation. BMC. Mol. Biol. 14, 11 (2013).
Kusakabe, M., Nakamura, I., Evans, J., Swanson, P. & Young, G. Changes in mRNAs encoding steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, steroidogenic enzymes and receptors for gonadotropins during spermatogenesis in rainbow trout testes. J. Endocrinol. 189, 541–554 (2006).
Carreau, S., Bouraima-Lelong, H. & Delalande, C. Estrogen, a female hormone involved in spermatogenesis. Adv Med Sci. 57, 31–36 (2012).
Misra, S. et al. Estrogen related receptor is required for the testicular development and for the normal sperm axoneme/mitochondrial derivatives in Drosophila males. Sci. Rep. 7, 40372 (2017).
Carreau, S. et al. Estrogen signaling in testicular cells. Life Sci. 89, 584–587 (2011).
Adeoya-Osiguwa, S. A., Markoulaki, S., Pocock, V., Milligan, S. R. & Fraser, L. R. 17beta-Estradiol and environmental estrogens significantly affect mammalian sperm function. Hum. Reprod. 18, 100–7 (2003).
Chauvigne, F., Parhi, J., Olle, J. & Cerda, J. Dual estrogenic regulation of the nuclear progestin receptor and spermatogonial renewal during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) spermatogenesis. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 206, 36–46 (2017).
Bahamonde, P. A., McMaster, M. E., Servos, M. R., Martyniuk, C. J. & Munkittrick, K. R. Characterizing transcriptional networks in male rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) that regulate testis development over a complete reproductive cycle. PLoS One. 11, e0164722 (2016).
Yang, W. X. & Sperry, A. O. C-terminal kinesin motor KIFC1 participates in acrosome biogenesis and vesicle transport. Biol Reprod. 69, 1719–1729 (2003).
Yu, K. M. et al. KIFC1 participates in acrosomal biogenesis, with discussion of its importance for the perforatorium in the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Cell Tissue Res. 337, 113–123 (2009).
Ma, D. D., Bi, L. A. & Yang, W. X. KIFC1 is essential for acrosome formation and nuclear shaping during spermiogenesis in the lobster Procambarus clarkia. Oncotarget. 8, 36082–36098 (2017).
Chen, J. et al. MicroRNA-202 maintains spermatogonial stem cells by inhibiting cell cycle regulators and RNA binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 4142–4157 (2017).
Tong, M. H., Mitchell, D., Evanoff, R. & Griswold, M. D. Expression of mirlet7 family microRNAs in response to retinoic acid-induced spermatogonial differentiation in Mice. Biol Reprod. 85, 189–197 (2011).
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).
Pertea, G. et al. TIGR gene indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics. 19, 651–652 (2003).
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215, 403–10 (1990).
Conesa, A., Gotz, S., Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Terol, J., Talon, M. & Robles, M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 21, 3674–3676 (2005).
Quevillon, E. et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W116–W120 (2005).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9, 357–359 (2012).
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 12, 323 (2011).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Robledo, D. et al. Analysis of qPCR reference gene stability determination methods and a practical approach for efficiency calculation on a turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) gonad dataset. BMC Genomics. 15, 648 (2014).
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 9, 559 (2008).
Zheng, Z. et al. Computational prediction of candidate miRNAs and their potential functions in biomineralization in pearl oyster Pinctada martensii. Saudi J Biol Sci. 23, 372–378 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31472264, 31572602, 31372514), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-47), The Scientific and Technological Innovation Project Financially Supported by Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (No. 2015ASKJ02, 2015ASKJ02-03-03), Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS and Chinese Academy of science and technology service network planning (KFJ-EW-STS-060).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.H.L. and J.L. conceived this study; X.Y.W. and Q.H.L. designed and performed the experiments; X.Y.W. conducted the data analysis and prepared figures and tables. X.Y.W., Q.H.L. wrote the manuscript. X.S.H., X.Y.S., Y.F.W., C.C.F., R.X., H.X.Z. and Z.C.S. participated in turbot cultivation and sample collection. All of the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Liu, Q., Xu, S. et al. Transcriptome Dynamics During Turbot Spermatogenesis Predicting the Potential Key Genes Regulating Male Germ Cell Proliferation and Maturation. Sci Rep 8, 15825 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34149-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34149-5
- Springer Nature Limited
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Spermatogenesis-Related CircRNAs and LncRNAs in Goat Spermatozoa
Biochemical Genetics (2024)
-
Developmental RNA-Seq transcriptomics of haploid germ cells and spermatozoa uncovers novel pathways associated with teleost spermiogenesis
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of gonadal development and renewal in the ovoviviparous black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii)
BMC Genomics (2021)
-
The initiation of puberty in Atlantic salmon brings about large changes in testicular gene expression that are modulated by the energy status
BMC Genomics (2019)