Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) often metastasize to lymph nodes resulting in poor prognosis for patients. Unfortunately, the underlying molecular mechanisms contributing to tumour aggressiveness, recurrences, and metastasis are still not fully understood. However, such knowledge is key to identify biomarkers and drug targets to improve prognosis and treatments. Consequently, we performed genome-wide expression profiling of 15 primary HNSSCs compared to corresponding lymph node metastases and non-malignant tissue of the same patient. Differentially expressed genes were bioinformatically exploited applying stringent filter criteria, allowing the discrimination between normal mucosa, primary tumours, and metastases. Signalling networks involved in invasion contain remodelling of the extracellular matrix, hypoxia-induced transcriptional modulation, and the recruitment of cancer associated fibroblasts, ultimately converging into a broad activation of PI3K/AKT-signalling pathway in lymph node metastasis. Notably, when we compared the diagnostic and prognostic value of sequencing data with our expression analysis significant differences were uncovered concerning the expression of the receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR and ERBB2, as well as other oncogenic regulators. Particularly, upregulated receptor tyrosine kinase combinations for individual patients varied, implying potential compensatory and resistance mechanisms against specific targeted therapies. Collectively, we here provide unique transcriptional profiles for disease predictions and comprehensively analyse involved signalling pathways in advanced HNSCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With over 500,000 new cases per year worldwide, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) develops from multiple anatomic subsites, including oral cavity, hypopharynx, oropharynx, larynx and nasopharynx1,2. Main risk factors include tobacco exposure, together with alcohol use, as well as infection with potentially oncogenic viruses, such as HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-31, and HPV-331,3,4. Moreover, the increasing (ab)use of so called ‘e-liquids’, as a more ‘healthy’ way of smoking, might need to be considered as an additional risk factor. However, conclusive studies are missing so far. When discovered in early-stage, HNSCC are treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy; for advanced stages treatment is multimodal1. Surgery is used when possible, usually combined with adjuvant chemoradiation, or definitive chemoradiation1. For recurrent and metastatic diseases, chemotherapy is applied with the option of alternative immunotherapy when chemotherapy is not tolerated1. All treatment is indicated mainly by primary site, TNM classification and other pathologic features limited by performance status1,5. Cancer therapies are changing gradually, shifting from systemic cytotoxic drugs to individual approaches. Essential for these personalized therapies are diagnostic tests predicting the clinical outcome of certain therapies using the vast knowledge of cancer origins and maintenance obtained by molecular biology6.
As the accumulation of mutations in tumours from patients with lymph node metastasis is not increased compared to patients without lymph node involvement7, other alterations have been suggested8. Expression profiling has been used to distinguish between cancer subtypes and predict disease outcome in different types of cancer9,10,11,12,13. Previous studies allowed the categorization of HNSCC tumours into distinct subtypes14, discovered a gene expression signature associated with recurrent disease15, or suggested genes with diagnostic or prognostic potential16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. Microarray analysis performed on normal oral epithelium compared to HNSCC elucidated the roles of microenvironment remodelling and immune responses in survival of HNSCC24. The only prognostic marker for HNSCC is the HPV status of the tumour, and predictive biomarkers to influence treatment selection are completely lacking1,25. Although HPV positive tumours differ significantly in their expression profiles, treatment options do not depend on the HPV status of the tumour1. Several new therapies targeting growth factor receptors or downstream signalling pathways are currently tested in clinical trials26. Without matching companion diagnostics, physicians will soon be challenged in choosing the most suitable therapy for each patient.
In this study, we analysed differentially expressed genes of HNSCC primary tumours compared to lymph node metastases in order to explore new biomarker candidates and involved signalling pathways. In contrast to other studies concentrating only on the analysis of primary tumours, we additionally focused on identifying the changes that lead to the dissemination of the primary tumour to lymph node metastasis. Gene expression microarray technology was applied to a group of 15 HNSCC tumours, their corresponding normal tissue mucosa and lymph node metastases resected by surgery. To facilitate data interpretation, statistical gene-set-enrichment methods and Qiagen’s software Ingenuity (Pathway Analysis, Comparison and Upstream Analysis, Biomarker Discovery) were used to intersect expressed genes with sets of genes associated with particular biological functions or pathways (as reviewed in27). We focused on obtaining a global view of differential gene expression in HNSCC compared to normal tissue mucosa, the primary tumour and corresponding lymph node metastases. The identification of characteristic gene expression signatures may potentially be exploited for diagnostic, prognostic or therapeutic purposes and promotes the reliability of the corresponding method.
Results
Validation of the gene expression data generated by oligonucleotide chip-arrays
In order to analyse gene expression, RNA from primary tumours (PT), lymph node metastases (M), and corresponding normal tissue mucosa (N) was subjected to microarray analysis using Affymetrix HG-U133A chips. The verification of the obtained data quality by independent experimental approaches is a prerequisite for further analytical approaches in all ‘omics’ technologies. Accordingly, we confirmed our chip-array data by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) for selected representative genes and samples. RT-PCR was performed to analyse expression patterns of randomly chosen CLCA4, FN1, POSTN, KRT24 and PRR4 in primary HNSCC vs. their corresponding normal tissue mucosa (PTvs.N, Fig. S1A) and ARPGAP25, FAIM3, RASGRP2, LYPD3, SERPINB4 and TP73L in lymph node metastasis vs. their corresponding primary HNSCC (Mvs.PT, Fig. S1B). FN1, POSTN and OLR1 genes were confirmed as up-regulated, KRT24, KRT4 and PRR4 as down-regulated in PTvs.N. ARPGAP25, FAIM3 and RASGRP2 genes were up-regulated, whereas LYPD3, SERPINB4 and TP73L were down-regulated in Mvs.PT. Additionally, quantitative PCR analyses were performed for ARGHAP25 (Fig. S2), SERPINB4 (Fig. S3) and PRR4 (Fig. S4). All results of qRT-PCR analyses were in accordance to the microarray data. In summary, the conducted controls underline the quality and reliability of our obtained GeneChip array data, fulfilling all prerequisites for further bioinformatics exploitation, model building and in depth functional and clinical analysis.
Identification of significantly upregulated genes in primary tumours and corresponding lymph node metastases
After normalization, we calculated the expression differences over all patients to compare primary tumours to normal mucosa (PTvs.N) and lymph node metastasis to primary tumours (Mvs.PT). By sorting the resulting lists using stringent filter criteria (first by p-value, second by log2FC), we obtained four TOP 30 lists for highly upregulated PTvs.N (Table S4), downregulated PTvs.N (Table S5), upregulated Mvs.PT (Table S6) and downregulated Mvs.PT (Table S7).
The 45 data sets were subjected to supervised (adjusted to the origin of the primary site) average-linkage hierarchical clustering. Normal tissue mucosa and primary tumours grouped separately on a clustering dendrogram (Fig. 1A) as well as normal tissue mucosa and metastasis (data not shown). Comparison of primary tumours vs. metastasis showed only marginal differences, displaying a rather gradual transition (Fig. 2A). As expected, these results show that metastasis and primary tumour were closely related and could not be clearly distinguished from each other.
In order to pinpoint the most important upregulated genes for either PTvs.N or Mvs.PT, we restricted the dataset to a p-value of lower than 0.0001 (corresponds to a FDR of 0.003 in PTvs.N and 0.004 in Mvs.PT) and a log2 fold change (FC) higher than 1.5 (equates to a FC of 2.83). This data restriction resulted in a signature gene set of 38 upregulated genes for PTvs.N (Fig. 1B and Table S8), and 62 upregulated genes for Mvs.PT respectively (Fig. 2B and Table S9).
Several proteins involved in the (re-)organization and assembly of the extracellular matrix were significantly overexpressed in all primary tumours compared to normal tissue mucosa (Table S8): Matrix Metallopeptidases, Collagens, Asporin, Fibronectin, Laminin, Lysyl Oxidases, Microfibrillar-Associated Protein, Periostin, Serpin Inhibitors, Osteonectin and Osteopontin. Higher expression of genes like KIF23, UBE2C, MCM7, NUP107, RSRC1, MAD2, BTAK, RFC5, ECT2 and CENPA was also found in metastatic tumours reports from other studies14. The latter 5 genes were also present in the distant recurrence predictor of van’t Veer et al. for breast cancer28. Regarding the comparison of Mvs.PT (Table S9), we identified upregulation of several genes related to the immune response, cellular metabolism, several membrane proteins, as well as genes interacting with or regulating GTPases.
Ingenuity Analysis of significantly up-/downregulated genes
Previously reported correlations were investigated thoroughly using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tool to reinforce the validity of our analysis. We applied the same restrictions as before, but included downregulated genes (p-value of lower than 0.0001 and higher than a log2FC of |1.5|) to our Ingenuity analysis. Comparing gene expression profiles of PTvs.N, we identified several disease/function networks for cancer and connective tissue disorders with a score higher than 20 (Fig. 3 and Table S10). For the dataset Mvs.PT, top networks included one network for immune response, as well as several networks for cell movement, cell-to-cell signalling and interaction with a score higher than 20 (Fig. 4 and Table S11). All top networks are illustrated in detail in Supplementary Figures S12–S27.
Ingenuity Analysis of upstream regulators
To further understand the context of activated networks, we used the upstream analysis tool of the Ingenuity software. Among the analysed activated upstream regulators for PTvs.N (z-score higher than 2) we found glycoprotein CD44, a stem cell marker for HNSCC29 and several growth factors like FGF2, TGFB1 and TGFB3 (Table 1A). Notably, there were only two significantly activated upstream regulators in Mvs.PT, namely the PI3K family which has been implicated with a more aggressive and invasive tumour type8,30 and the cytokine IFNγ which has previously been suggested as a salivary biomarker for early diagnosis of oral cancer31 (Table 2).
Surprisingly, inhibited upstream regulators (z-score lower than -2) for PTvs.N included the oncogene MYC (Table 1). There were no significantly inhibited upstream regulators for Mvs.PT (Table 2). The Ingenuity Comparison Analysis of selected canonical pathways showed a high relevance for cancer pathways and tissue morphology in both primary tumours as well as metastases, whereas cell movement and inflammatory response were predicted more prominent just in metastases (Figs S8 and S9).
Further downstream analysis revealed several interesting networks, one of them being activated by Fibronectin 1 (FN1) in PTvs.N (Fig. S5). Since FN1 is involved in several cellular processes, such as remodelling of the extracellular matrix, it is of general note to investigate the expression and activation status of its downstream targets. This will allow the identification of potential activation processes and prediction of corresponding cellular processes. Downstream targets of FN1 include VEGFA, the Jnk Family, the Tgf beta family, HRAS and the ERK1/2 family, which collectively activate diverse cellular functions via the transcription factor ETS1 (expression of cytokine and chemokine genes), beta-Catenin (key downstream component of Wnt signalling), the transcription factor Jun-B (regulation of gene activity following growth factor response), the corresponding nuclear phosphoprotein c-Fos and Ap-1, as well as the transcription factor SP1. All of these genes were activated and/or overexpressed in our dataset PTvs.N (Fig. S5).
The PI3K family has been shown to be essentially important for metastatic transformation30 and is the most significant activated upstream activator in Mvs.PT (Table 2). The PI3K group activates NFkB via Akt and promotes the release of MMP9, which is the most important matrix metalloprotease in degrading the basement membrane, which is also predicted by Ingenuity (Fig. S6). The NFkB complex usually activates DNA damage response via RELA and RELB, blocking PPARG and the Jnk family but this could not be confirmed by our Ingenuity prediction for Mvs.PT (Fig. S7). The nuclear receptor PPAR gamma is activated, which should block pro-inflammatory NFkB-mediated responses32. In contrast, tumour-promoting cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL10 are upregulated (Fig. S7) underlining the complexity and crosslinking of malignant signalling pathways as previously described33.
Deregulated canonical pathways are essential for tumour maintenance and important factors of malignancy. For both primary tumours (Fig. S8) and metastases (Fig. S9), the pathways of Nicotine Degradation and Ethanol Degradation were activated (Figs S10 and S11). Since all patients were smokers and alcohol consumers (Table S1), those findings are in accordance to our expectations.
Comparison of amplification profiles of next generation genome sequencing data to our analysis
Since next generation sequencing (NGS) has had a major impact on cancer research, we compared recent NGS amplification34 and PARADIGM prediction data34 based on RNA sequencing data from the Broad Institute TCGA Genome database35 to our microarray analysis. Here, a log2FC higher than 0.263 was used as an overexpression tendency (corresponding to a 20% higher expression). For many genes, we found a concordant tendency of their regulation when we compared the genomic amplification and PARADIGM percentages (AMP) published by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project36 and our expressional data (Table 3). Especially FGFR1 (13% in PTvs.N and 7% in Mvs.PT to 10% in AMP), FGFR3 (7% in PTvs.N and Mvs.PT to 2% in AMP), DDR2 in lymph node metastasis (13% in Mvs.PT to 3% in AMP) and MET (7% in PTvs.N and Mvs.PT to 2% AMP, FC 2.4; Fig. S28) seem to be similarly overexpressed. Remarkably, we did not find a significant overexpression of EGFR, neither in the primary tumour, nor in their corresponding lymph node metastasis. In contrast, RNA-Seq-based amplification data suggested an AMP of 15% for EGFR. The receptor Her-2 (ERBB2), which was amplified in 4% of specimens in TCGA cohort, was mostly downregulated in our expression data as well as the RNA-Seq data (FC 0.479; Fig. S28). MYC, which was shown to be inactivated in our Ingenuity upstream analysis, was overexpressed in 7% of patients, compared to 14% amplification in TCGA samples. E2F1 and NFE2L2 overexpression values were both higher than expected by TCGA data, and even more elevated in metastasis than in primary tumours. We also found a higher expression for EPHA2, DDR2 and PIK3R1 compared to AMP published by TCGA. No significant differences between the fold changes of the PTvs.N to the Mvs.N dataset could be detected for FGFR1, IGF1R, FGFR2, MET, HRAS, PTEN and NF1. ERBB2, FGFR3 and MYC overexpression percentages were significantly higher in primary tumours than in metastases.
Comparison of individual Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RTK) expression patterns
Due to their crucial role in HNSCC as upstream regulators of e.g. the phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway mediating invasiveness and malignancy30, we concentrated on further exploring the expression of growth factor receptors (receptor tyrosine kinases, RTKs). Remarkably, in our study PI3K was one of only two significantly activated upstream regulators in Mvs.PT (Table 2). Based on the list of amplified genes from the HNSCC TCGA project, we created an overview of relative RTK expression for PTvs.N and Mvs.N (Fig. 5). With the exception of two patients, all patients showed overexpression tendency of at least one RTK indicated by an upregulation of at least 20%. Most patients showed an upregulation of random combinations of at least two RTKs. For example, patient 6 showed an upregulation combination of ERBB4, VEGFR2 and PDGFRB, and a slight upregulation of MET in PTvs.N. In patient 14, VEGFR2, PDGFRB and DDR2 were higher expressed in comparison to normal mucosa. An expanded overview of RTK and oncogene expression can be found in the Supplementary Material (Fig. S29).
Discussion
Precision medicine requires individualized therapeutic approaches that fulfill the needs of each patient. Therefore, both prognostic as well as predictive markers are a crucial prerequisite. The thorough understanding of underlying mechanisms of tumorigenicity is not only the basis for the development of new drugs, but also for biomarker development.
In this study we analysed and compared the expression profiles of 15 primary tumours to their corresponding normal tissue mucosa and paired lymph node metastasis. In contrast, previous microarray-based studies of HNSCC have focused only on primary tumours versus normal mucosa or primary tumour patterns of expression16,17,18,19,20,21,37. Since the number of patients is relatively low, p-values have to be interpreted with caution38. We are aware of the limitations of this study and recommend replicate tests for their verification.
We have identified and verified several genes and pathways that are significantly overexpressed in HNSCC tumours with lymph node metastases. Based on this study, we here provide a model how genes involved in tumorigenesis and metastatic progression are differentially expressed in HNSCC, involving changes in the extracellular matrix, hypoxia and EMT (overview in Fig. 6). Our finding of highly upregulated matrix metalloproteases, integrins, collagens, fibronectin, laminin and other ECM proteins supports previous studies showing that degradation of the basement membrane and remodelling of the extracellular matrix are essential during the invasion process of a tumour39,40,41.
Molecules Interacting with CasL-2 Proteins (MICALs) are monooxygenases that cause actin to depolymerize and are implicated in the regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics, intracellular trafficking, the docking and fusion of exocytotic vesicles and also have anti-apoptotic properties42. MICAL2, which was significantly upregulated in our PTvs.N dataset, has been identified as one of the most significantly upregulated genes in smoking-induced lung cancer43 and has been associated with prostate cancer progression44 as well as EMT, cancer growth and invasion45, but has not been implicated with head and neck cancer, yet.
The destruction and remodelling of the extracellular matrix not only drives the mechanical and proteolytic invasion of tumour cells, but also favours metastatic cell reprogramming and behaviour46,47,48. Specialized Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) can degrade various ECM proteins like collagens, basement membrane laminin and fibronectin46, leading to a more aggressive behaviour of the cancer, lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis, as shown in oral cancer49,50. When the Chemokine C-X-C Motif Receptor Type 4 (CXCR4), whose expression can be enhanced by hypoxia, binds Stromal Cell-derived Factor 1 (CXCL12), secreted by CAFs, release of MMP-9 to the tumour microenvironment is stimulated51,52. In our data, we identified a switch from MMP1, 3 and 13 in primary tumours to MMP1, 9 and 12 in metastases, as well as a significant upregulation of CXCL12/CXCR4. Resulting MMP levels and the ratio of activated MMPs to total MMP concentration compared to adjacent normal tissue is positively correlated with lymph node involvement51,53. MMP9 is the most versatile of the MMPs and can degrade various elements of the tumour microenvironment, like elastin, fibrillin, laminin, gelatin and collagens of type IV, V, XI and XVI52,54.
Hypoxia is very common in solid tumours, especially in HNSCC55, which has repeatedly been associated with poor prognosis56. Additionally, hypoxic environments induce genes supporting stem cell maintenance, angiogenesis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), leading to an aggressive, invasive phenotype57,58,59. CXCR4 inhibitors have most recently been suggested as treatment for advanced and metastasizing HNSCC60, and have previously been reported to have synergistic effects with anti-PDL1 therapies61.
Homeobox B7 (HOXB7) is a developmental gene we found highly upregulated in our PTvs.N dataset. HOXB7 confers epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer62, promotes malignant progression by activation of TGF signalling63 and lung metastasis64 and renders breast cancer cells resistant to tamoxifen through activation of the EGFR pathway65. HOXB7 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis66 and has been suggested as a prognostic factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma67. Migration of endothelial progenitor cells is mediated by CXCL12/CXCR4 via PI3K/Akt/eNOS signalling68. The CXCL12/CXCR4 system also facilitates lymph node metastatic potential in oral squamous cell carcinoma by enabling EMT69.
The phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is the most frequently altered oncogenic driver in head and neck cancer and its upstream regulators and downstream targets might be the most interesting targets for predictive biomarkers30,70. While we could not show a single significantly upregulated growth factor receptor for all patients, we could confirm the global upregulation of the pathway in our Ingenuity Analysis. Interestingly, most patients showed a tendency for upregulation of at least two RTKs in varying combinations (Fig. 5). Several correlations involving sets of RTKs have previously been shown in different tumour entities. A meta-analysis for breast cancer has indicated the association of an overexpression of various RTKs with poor outcomes and suggested a clinical evaluation of combination agents against RTKs or relevant oncogenic nodes71. In breast cancer, MEK inhibition resulted in acute ERK activity loss and subsequent c-MYC degradation that induced expression and activation of PDGFRB, DDR2 and VEGFR272, an RTK combination found in patients 6 (PT) and 10 (M) of our dataset (Fig. 5). It has been proposed that upregulation of FGFRs (as seen in patients 4, 9 and 10, as well as to a minor degree in patients 7, 12, 14 and 15, Fig. 5) could be involved in the development of resistance to anti-VEGFR therapies, since both pathways are regulating tumour neoangiogenesis (as reviewed in73). In breast cancer patients with FGFR1 or FGF3 amplification, multikinase FGFR/VEGFR inhibitors have shown promising activity74. It has been suggested to treat RTK-driven tumours by hitting signalling nodes interconnecting core pathways, targeting c-Abl as a signalling node connecting MET and TP5375,76 (cp. patients 2, 5, 6 and 9, Figs 5 and S29).
In comparison with recent high throughput sequencing data, we showed a comprehensive list of upregulated genes for each patient. Regarding numerous targeted therapies for HNSCC currently in clinical studies26, it will be essential to develop predictive biomarkers allowing the selection of an optimal therapy for each patient. Currently, molecular companion diagnostics are still lacking for all therapeutic approaches in HNSCC. For Cetuximab, the only targeted therapy currently in clinical use for HNSCC, the development of acneiform rash is still the best indicator for therapy response77. EGFR-expression status, determined by immunohistochemistry, could not be verified as a predictive marker for EGFR-targeted therapy response78,79, even though mechanisms of action and resistance mechanisms have been thoroughly investigated (as reviewed in80,81). EGFR is amplified in normal mucosa of tobacco using patients, and might thereby be not the oncogenic driver, but rather a response to carcinogenic agents81. This might explain our results for the comparison of EGFR expression in primary tumour vs. normal mucosa (Table 3 and Fig. 5).
The combination of NGS with other approaches is most promising for the development of clinically relevant, molecular subgroups that will guide treatment (as reviewed in82). Whole genome expression profiling, including mutational analysis by RNA-Seq might surpass the limitations of microarray technology, but currently is still too expensive to be included in large multi-centered clinical studies. This experimental approach might also lack reproducibility due to different platforms and handling. Additionally, the large amount of data produced by high throughput sequencing techniques has to be processed and interpreted carefully. Microarrays may no longer be the standard for basic scientific research, but are currently miniaturized and automated as a cost-effective on-chip nanotechnology for clinical diagnostic approaches83,84. We suggest analysing a selection of biomarker candidates by customized automated microarrays, which should be narrowed down by previous next generation sequencing approaches. These analyses should be performed parallel to clinical trials for HNSCC and other types of cancer. Correlating a small list of chosen potential biomarkers to clinical data of outcomes and treatment efficiency might facilitate following health technology assessment for drug approval as well as biomarker development. Such approaches should also be employed for investigating the pathobiological relevance of so called ‘e-liquids’, currently widely considered as a more ‘healthy’ way of smoking by the population.
In conclusion, we here shed new light on the expression differences in lymph node metastasis compared to primary HNSCC tumours, and provide the data for further analyses.
Material and Methods
Reagents
All reagents were purchased from Sigma unless stated otherwise.
Patient characteristics and material
Tissue samples were obtained from 15 patients undergoing surgical resection at the departments of otolaryngology of the Universities of Frankfurt and Mainz. Investigation has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards according to the Declaration of Helsinki and according to national and international guidelines. The study protocol has been approved by the ethics committees “Ethik-Kommission des Fachbereichs Medizin, Universitätsklinikum der Goethe-Universität” (#83756604) and “Ethik-Kommission der Landesärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz” (#83748515) after obtaining the patients’ informed consent to participate in the study and was processed anonymously. All cases were diagnosed histopathologically as HNSCC and staged according to the TNM classification of malignant tumours recommended by the ‘Union International contre le Cancer’ UICC. In this study, tumour specimens, corresponding non-malignant tissue from the oral cavity (buccal mucosa), and lymph node metastasis from each patient were analysed. The median age of patients was 56 years and 86% were males. Six of the resected tumours were classified as grade 2 (40%), nine as grade 3 (60%). Twelve patients had a lymph node status of N1/2 (80%) and three of N3 (20%). The majority of cancers were located in the hypopharynx (60%), 13.3% in the larynx and 26.6% in the oropharynx (Table S1). Specimens included oropharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal carcinoma of different tumour size (T1–T4) and lymph node status (N1-3), without distant metastasis (M0). Additional inclusion criteria were positive alcohol and tobacco use, HPV-negative status of the primary tumour, a histopathological grading of 2–3 and the patients did not have previous cancer treatment before surgery. Upon resection, samples were immediately placed on ice and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen within 30 min. Histological analyses were performed to ensure that each specimen of primary tumours and metastasis contained >70% tumour cells and <10% necrotic debris. Normal mucosa was histopathologically checked for non-malignancy. All criteria were cross-checked and approved by the independent analyses of at least two qualified head and neck pathologists. Samples not meeting these criteria were rejected.
RNA extraction
Frozen tissue samples (30–50 mg) were collected in 1 ml Trizol (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and dispersed using an Ultra-Turrax T25 tissue homogenizer (IKA Werke, Staufen, Germany). Total RNA was extracted according to the recommendations given by the manufacturer’s Trizol protocol and further purified on RNeasy Mini spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Integrity and purity of total RNA were assessed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Boeblingen, Germany) using RNA 6000 Nano LabChip Kit (Agilent) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as previously described85, accepting absorbance ratios of 1.8–2.2 for A260/A280 and a A260/A230 ratio of lower than 1.7. Samples not meeting these criteria were rejected.
Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR
RT-PCR was performed using specific primer sets for OSF2, FN1, KRT24, CLCA4, PRR4, SCCA2b, TP73L, LYPD3, FCMR, ARHGAP25 and RASGRP2 genes (Table S9). GAPDH was used to control the amounts of cDNA generated from each sample as described85,86,87. First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using a cDNA synthesis kit for RT-PCR (Superscript II, Invitrogen life technologies). 1 µg of total RNA was converted to cDNA and 1 µl of the 20 µl RT product was amplified for 30 cycles (initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 30 sec at 95 °C, 30 sec at a variable temperature for annealing and 1 min at 72 °C) followed by an extension of 5 min at 72 °C. RT-PCR amplification products were analysed on 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR analysis
For ARHGAP25, SERPINB4 and PRR4, changes in mRNA levels detected in microarray experiments were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR analysis, using the iCycler (BioRad, Munich, Germany). One µg of total RNA was converted to cDNA using Superscript II (Invitrogen Corporation) and oligo(dT) primer according to manufacturer’s specifications. PCR reaction mixtures consisted of 12.5 µl of 2× iQ SYBER Green Supermix (Abgene, UK), 0.5 µl of each 10 µM target primer, 1 µl (1:10) cDNA template in a final scaled down reaction volume of 25 µl. Thermal cycling conditions comprised an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 sec and variable annealing temperatures for 30 sec depending on the respective set of target primers. Cumulative fluorescence was measured at the end of the extension phase of each cycle. Specific amplicon formation with each primer pair was confirmed by dissociation curve analysis and by visualization of a single band on a 2% agarose gel. To define the relative expression of the genes, the PCR product results from each tumour sample were compared with the results from normal tissue or lymph node metastasis from the same patient. The relative expression ratio (R) of target gene is calculated using the equation: Ratio = (Etarget)ΔCp target(control-sample)/(Eref)ΔCpref(control-sample) based on its real-time PCR efficiencies (E) and the crossing point (CP) difference of an unknown sample versus a control and expressed relative to the non-regulated housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH), as described86,88.
Target preparation and hybridization for Affymetrix GeneChip Arrays
Total RNA (5 µg) was used to prepare biotinylated cRNAs for hybridization, following the guidelines given in the Affymetrix GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual. cRNA clean-up was performed on RNeasy Mini filters (Qiagen). In all, 10 µg of fragmented, labelled cRNA were hybridized to Affymetrix HG-U133A arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using standard conditions (16 h, 45 °C). Arrays were washed and stained in a Fluidics Station 400 (Affymetrix) and scanned on a Gene Array Scanner 2500 (Agilent), as recommended by Affymetrix.
Statistical Analysis
Analysis of the data was performed using R 2.15.2 with the limma package 3.14.4. Raw fluorescence intensities from all hybridizations were normalized, applying robust multichip average (RMA) normalization for the. CEL data, followed by a quantile normalization to compare expression results across specimens89,90. For the comparison of primary tumours to normal mucosa (PTvs.N), metastasis to normal mucosa (Mvs.N) and metastasis to primary tumours (Mvs.PT) of differentially expressed genes, we also utilized the limma package and adjusted our model for each tissue type (supervised clustering). For multiple testing a Bonferroni correction was performed. Due to the large number of tests applied in this study, p-values have to be interpreted with caution.
For comparative analysis of our microarray analysis to NGS amplification data34 and PARADIGM prediction data (including RNA-Seq)34, we used genomic amplification percentages (AMP). AMP specifies the percentage of samples for which amplification of a respective gene was published by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project36. It should be noted that in our study we just compared data of HPV-negative tumours.
Ingenuity analysis
The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) tool (Ingenuity Systems) was used to identify pathways related to enriched genes in primary tumours (PTvs.N) or metastasis (Mvs.N), as well as primary tumours compared to metastasis (Mvs.PT). Data was filtered to meet the criteria p < 0,0001 and a log2FC > |1,5| threshold in our comparison analysis. For each probeset, its Affymetrix probeset ID and its p-value from the comparison analysis were loaded into the analysis tool and mapped to its corresponding gene object in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Marur, S. & Forastiere, A. A. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clinic proceedings 91, 386–396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017 (2016).
Torre, L. A. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 65, 87–108, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262 (2015).
Leemans, C. R., Braakhuis, B. J. & Brakenhoff, R. H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer 11, 9–22, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2982 (2011).
Vidal, L. & Gillison, M. L. Human papillomavirus in HNSCC: recognition of a distinct disease type. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 22, 1125–1142, vii, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2008.08.006 (2008).
Pfister, D. G. et al. Head and neck cancers, version 2.2013. Featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11, 917–923 (2013).
van’t Veer, L. J. & Bernards, R. Enabling personalized cancer medicine through analysis of gene-expression patterns. Nature 452, 564–570, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06915 (2008).
Onken, M. D. et al. A surprising cross-species conservation in the genomic landscape of mouse and human oral cancer identifies a transcriptional signature predicting metastatic disease. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20, 2873–2884, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0205 (2014).
Markwell, S. M. & Weed, S. A. Tumor and stromal-based contributions to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma invasion. Cancers 7, 382–406, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7010382 (2015).
Alizadeh, A. A. et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403, 503–511 (2000).
Golub, T. R. et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286, 531–537 (1999).
Bittner, M. et al. Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling. Nature 406, 536–540 (2000).
Huang, E. et al. Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes. Lancet 361, 1590–1596 (2003).
MacDonald, T. J. et al. Expression profiling of medulloblastoma: PDGFRA and the RAS/MAPK pathway as therapeutic targets for metastatic disease. Nature genetics 29, 143–152 (2001).
Chung, C. H. et al. Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression. Cancer cell 5, 489–500 (2004).
Ginos, M. A. et al. Identification of a gene expression signature associated with recurrent disease in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer research 64, 55–63 (2004).
Al Moustafa, A. E. et al. Identification of genes associated with head and neck carcinogenesis by cDNA microarray comparison between matched primary normal epithelial and squamous carcinoma cells. Oncogene 21, 2634–2640 (2002).
Alevizos, I. et al. Oral cancer in vivo gene expression profiling assisted by laser capture microdissection and microarray analysis. Oncogene 20, 6196–6204 (2001).
Cromer, A. et al. Identification of genes associated with tumorigenesis and metastatic potential of hypopharyngeal cancer by microarray analysis. Oncogene 23, 2484–2498 (2004).
El-Naggar, A. K. et al. Differential expression profiling of head and neck squamous carcinoma: significance in their phenotypic and biological classification. Oncogene 21, 8206–8219 (2002).
Leethanakul, C. et al. Distinct pattern of expression of differentiation and growth-related genes in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck revealed by the use of laser capture microdissection and cDNA arrays. Oncogene 19, 3220–3224 (2000).
Mendez, E. et al. Transcriptional expression profiles of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 95, 1482–1494 (2002).
Knauer, S. K. et al. An otoprotective role for the apoptosis inhibitor protein survivin. Cell Death Dis 1, e51 (2010).
Fetz, V. et al. Inducible NO synthase confers chemoresistance in head and neck cancer by modulating survivin. International journal of cancer 124, 2033–2041, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24182 (2009).
Thurlow, J. K. et al. Spectral clustering of microarray data elucidates the roles of microenvironment remodeling and immune responses in survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 28, 2881–2888, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8724 (2010).
Fakhry, C. et al. Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100, 261–269, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn011 (2008).
Suh, Y., Amelio, I., Guerrero Urbano, T. & Tavassoli, M. Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell death & disease 5, e1018, https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2013.548 (2014).
Kramer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. Jr & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30, 523–530 (2013).
van‘t Veer, L. J. et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415, 530–536 (2002).
Faber, A. et al. CD44 as a stem cell marker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology reports 26, 321–326, https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2011.1322 (2011).
Simpson, D. R., Mell, L. K. & Cohen, E. E. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral oncology 51, 291–298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.012 (2015).
Prasad, G. & McCullough, M. Chemokines and cytokines as salivary biomarkers for the early diagnosis of oral cancer. Int J Dent 2013, 813756, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/813756 (2013).
Lawrence, T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1, a001651, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001651 (2009).
Karin, M. NF-kappaB as a critical link between inflammation and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1, a000141, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000141 (2009).
Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature 489, 519–525, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11404 (2012).
Center, B. I. T. G. D. A. In Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (2016).
Cancer Genome Atlas, N.. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 517, 576–582, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14129 (2015).
Kuriakose, M. A. et al. Selection and validation of differentially expressed genes in head and neck cancer. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 61, 1372–1383 (2004).
Schlingemann, J. et al. Patient-based cross-platform comparison of oligonucleotide microarray expression profiles. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 85, 1024–1039 (2005).
Paz, H., Pathak, N. & Yang, J. Invading one step at a time: the role of invadopodia in tumor metastasis. Oncogene 33, 4193–4202, https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.393 (2014).
Rosenthal, E. L. & Matrisian, L. M. Matrix metalloproteases in head and neck cancer. Head & neck 28, 639–648, https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20365 (2006).
Wünsch, D. et al. Taspase1: a ‘Misunderstood’ protease with translational cancer relevance. Oncogene 35, 3351–3364, https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.436 (2016).
Zhou, Y., Gunput, R. A., Adolfs, Y. & Pasterkamp, R. J. MICALs in control of the cytoskeleton, exocytosis, and cell death. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 68, 4033–4044, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0787-2 (2011).
Fang, X., Netzer, M., Baumgartner, C., Bai, C. & Wang, X. Genetic network and gene set enrichment analysis to identify biomarkers related to cigarette smoking and lung cancer. Cancer treatment reviews 39, 77–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.001 (2013).
Ashida, S. et al. Expression of novel molecules, MICAL2-PV (MICAL2 prostate cancer variants), increases with high Gleason score and prostate cancer progression. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 12, 2767–2773, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1995 (2006).
Mariotti, S. et al. MICAL2 is a novel human cancer gene controlling mesenchymal to epithelial transition involved in cancer growth and invasion. Oncotarget 7, 1808–1825, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6577 (2016).
Gaggioli, C. et al. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nature cell biology 9, 1392–1400, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1658 (2007).
Goetz, J. G. et al. Biomechanical remodeling of the microenvironment by stromal caveolin-1 favors tumor invasion and metastasis. Cell 146, 148–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.040 (2011).
Uchida, D. et al. Acquisition of lymph node, but not distant metastatic potentials, by the overexpression of CXCR4 in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 84, 1538–1546, https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700190 (2004).
Lim, K. P. et al. Fibroblast gene expression profile reflects the stage of tumour progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. The Journal of pathology 223, 459–469, https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2841 (2011).
Marsh, D. et al. Stromal features are predictive of disease mortality in oral cancer patients. The Journal of pathology 223, 470–481, https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2830 (2011).
Ishikawa, T. et al. Hypoxia enhances CXCR4 expression by activating HIF-1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology reports 21, 707–712 (2009).
Koontongkaew, S., Amornphimoltham, P., Monthanpisut, P., Saensuk, T. & Leelakriangsak, M. Fibroblasts and extracellular matrix differently modulate MMP activation by primary and metastatic head and neck cancer cells. Medical oncology 29, 690–703, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-9871-6 (2012).
Uchida, D. et al. Possible role of stromal-cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 signaling on lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Experimental cell research 290, 289–302 (2003).
Price, S. J., Greaves, D. R. & Watkins, H. Identification of novel, functional genetic variants in the human matrix metalloproteinase-2 gene: role of Sp1 in allele-specific transcriptional regulation. The Journal of biological chemistry 276, 7549–7558, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M010242200 (2001).
Isa, A. Y., Ward, T. H., West, C. M., Slevin, N. J. & Homer, J. J. Hypoxia in head and neck cancer. The British journal of radiology 79, 791–798, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/17904358 (2006).
Janssen, H. L., Haustermans, K. M., Balm, A. J. & Begg, A. C. Hypoxia in head and neck cancer: how much, how important? Head & neck 27, 622–638, https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20223 (2005).
Jiang, J., Tang, Y. L. & Liang, X. H. EMT: a new vision of hypoxia promoting cancer progression. Cancer biology & therapy 11, 714–723 (2011).
Semenza, G. L. Oxygen sensing, hypoxia-inducible factors, and disease pathophysiology. Annual review of pathology 9, 47–71, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104720 (2014).
Sullivan, R. & Graham, C. H. Hypoxia-driven selection of the metastatic phenotype. Cancer metastasis reviews 26, 319–331, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-007-9062-2 (2007).
Knopf, A., Fritsche, M. K. & Li, Y. CXCR4: A New Player in an Old Scene? ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 79, 34–42, https://doi.org/10.1159/000455706 (2017).
Garrido-Laguna, I. & Hidalgo, M. Pancreatic cancer: from state-of-the-art treatments to promising novel therapies. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 12, 319–334, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.53 (2015).
Wu, X. et al. HOXB7, a homeodomain protein, is overexpressed in breast cancer and confers epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer research 66, 9527–9534, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4470 (2006).
Liu, S. et al. HOXB7 promotes malignant progression by activating the TGFbeta signaling pathway. Cancer research 75, 709–719, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3100 (2015).
Chen, H. et al. Hoxb7 inhibits transgenic HER-2/neu-induced mouse mammary tumor onset but promotes progression and lung metastasis. Cancer research 68, 3637–3644, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2926 (2008).
Jin, K. et al. The HOXB7 protein renders breast cancer cells resistant to tamoxifen through activation of the EGFR pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 2736–2741, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018859108 (2012).
De Souza Setubal Destro, M. F. et al. Overexpression of HOXB7 homeobox gene in oral cancer induces cellular proliferation and is associated with poor prognosis. International journal of oncology 36, 141–149 (2010).
Bitu, C. C. et al. HOXB7 expression is a prognostic factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology 60, 662–665, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04102.x (2012).
Zheng, H., Fu, G., Dai, T. & Huang, H. Migration of endothelial progenitor cells mediated by stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha/CXCR4 via PI3K/Akt/eNOS signal transduction pathway. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology 50, 274–280, https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0b013e318093ec8f (2007).
Onoue, T. et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by the stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 system in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. International journal of oncology 29, 1133–1138 (2006).
Lui, V. W. et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer discovery 3, 761–769, https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0103 (2013).
Templeton, A. J. et al. Prognostic relevance of receptor tyrosine kinase expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer treatment reviews 40, 1048–1055 (2014).
Duncan, J. S. et al. Dynamic reprogramming of the kinome in response to targeted MEK inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell 149, 307–321 (2012).
Dieci, M. V., Arnedos, M., Andre, F. & Soria, J. C. Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as a cancer treatment: from a biologic rationale to medical perspectives. Cancer discovery 3, 264–279 (2013).
Dienstmann, R. et al. Genomic aberrations in the FGFR pathway: opportunities for targeted therapies in solid tumors. Ann Oncol 25, 552–563 (2014).
Furlan, A. et al. Abl interconnects oncogenic Met and p53 core pathways in cancer cells. Cell death and differentiation 18, 1608–1616 (2011).
Brandl, A. et al. Dynamically regulated sumoylation of HDAC2 controls p53 deacetylation and restricts apoptosis following genotoxic stress. J Mol Cell Biol (2012).
Trivedi, S. et al. Immune biomarkers of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy. Ann Oncol 26, 40–47 (2015).
Ang, K. K. et al. Randomized phase III trial of concurrent accelerated radiation plus cisplatin with or without cetuximab for stage III to IV head and neck carcinoma: RTOG 0522. J Clin Oncol 32, 2940–2950 (2014).
Harrington, K. et al. Postoperative Adjuvant Lapatinib and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Maintenance Lapatinib Monotherapy in High-Risk Patients With Resected Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Oncol 33, 4202–4209 (2015).
Chong, C. R. & Janne, P. A. The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer. Nature medicine 19, 1389–1400, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3388 (2013).
Chapman, C. H., Saba, N. F. & Yom, S. S. Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: still lost in translation? Annals of translational medicine 4, 80 (2016).
Sethi, N., MacLennan, K., Wood, H. M. & Rabbitts, P. Past and future impact of next-generation sequencing in head and neck cancer. Head & neck 38(Suppl 1), E2395–2402 (2015).
Gulley, M. L. & Morgan, D. R. Molecular oncology testing in resource-limited settings. J Mol Diagn 16, 601–611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.07.002 (2014).
Docter, D. et al. No king without a crown–impact of the nanomaterial-protein corona on nanobiomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond) 10, 503–519 (2015).
Knauer, S. K. et al. Functional characterization of novel mutations affecting survivin (BIRC5)-mediated therapy resistance in head and neck cancer patients. Hum Mutat 34, 395–404, https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22249 (2013).
Knauer, S. K. et al. The survivin isoform survivin-3B is cytoprotective and can function as a chromosomal passenger complex protein. Cell cycle Georgetown, Tex 6, 1502–1509 (2007).
Rosorius, O. et al. Direct observation of nucleo-cytoplasmic transport by microinjection of GFP-tagged proteins in living cells. BioTechniques 27, 350–355 (1999).
Engels, K. et al. NO signaling confers cytoprotectivity through the survivin network in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 68, 5159–5166 (2008).
Bolstad, B. M., Irizarry, R. A., Astrand, M. & Speed, T. P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185–193 (2003).
Irizarry, R. A. et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249–264, https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249 (2003).
Lawrence, M. S. et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 505, 495–501, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12912 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We thank Sandra Schneider for excellent technical assistance. Grant support: BMBF-NanoBEL, Impulsfonds RLP, BioMATICS, SFB1093, and NanoTransMed, which is cofounded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the framework of the INTERREG V Upper Rhine program, the Swiss Confederation and the swiss cantons of Aargau, Basel-Landschaft and Basel-Stadt. This study was supported by grants from the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, Else-Kröner Foundation, Zeiss-ChemBioMed, Stiftung Tumorforschung Kopf-Hals, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Support Program of the University Hospital Mainz.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.G., N.H., A.G.-A. and J.M. conceived, designed and conducted experiments and analysed the data; D.W., S.K., J.K., C.M. and S.S. co-designed the study and revised the manuscript; D.G., D.W. and R.S. conceived and designed the study and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Goesswein, D., Habtemichael, N., Gerhold-Ay, A. et al. Expressional analysis of disease-relevant signalling-pathways in primary tumours and metastasis of head and neck cancers. Sci Rep 8, 7326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25512-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25512-7
- Springer Nature Limited