Abstract
We report on infrared spectroscopy experiments on the electronic response in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 (x = 0, 0.021, and 0.067). Our data show that electron doping induced by La substitution leads to an insulator-to-metal transition. The evolution of the electronic structure across the transition reveals the robustness of the strong electronic correlations against the electron doping. The conductivity data of the metallic compound show the signature of the pseudogap that bears close similarity to the analogous studies of the pseudogap in the underdoped cuprates. While the low energy conductivity of the metallic compound is barely frequency dependent, the formation of the pseudogap is revealed by the gradual suppression of the featureless conductivity below a threshold frequency of about 17 meV. The threshold structure develops below about 100 K which is in the vicinity of the onset of the short-range antiferromagnetic order. Our results demonstrate that the electronic correlations play a crucial role in the anomalous charge dynamics in the (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The layered perovskite variant iridate Sr2IrO4 has attracted considerable attentions as a candidate correlated electron material from which unconventional superconductivity is predicted to emerge when external carriers are introduced. Sr2IrO4 bears close similarities to the parent compounds of high-temperature cuprate superconductors. The electromagnetic state of Sr2IrO4 is described by a pseudospin 1/2 antiferromagnetic Mott state where the cooperation between the electronic correlations and the spin-orbit coupling leads to the formation of the effective total angular momentum J eff = 1/2 Mott insulating state1, 2. The magnetic excitation spectra of Sr2IrO4 is well described by antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model with a pseudospin 1/2 on a quasi-two-dimensional square lattice3, 4. Given these similarities, theoretical studies suggest that a singlet d-wave or a triplet p-wave high-temperature superconductivity could emerge in electron or hole-doped Sr2IrO4, respectively5,6,7. Subsequent experimental effort searching for high-temperature superconductivity indeed uncovered the parallel phenomenology to the cuprates including the d-wave gap8, the pseudogap9,10,11,12,13, and other broken-symmetry phases14 in carrier-doped Sr2IrO4.
The spectroscopic manifestation of the pseudogap in electron-doped Sr2IrO4 is analogous to that of the enigmatic pseudogap in the cuprates. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) experiments on K-deposited or La-doped Sr2IrO4 revealed the antinodal pseudogap state with coherent nodal excitations upon electron doping9, 10. In K-deposited Sr2IrO4, the Fermi arc representing the pseudogap emerges at about 110 K for 0.7 monolayer coverage (~6% electron doping)9 and evolves into a nodal point with a d-wave symmetry at lower temperatures8. Scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS) studies demonstrated that the nanoscale electronic phase separation occurred upon electron doping and the pseudogap states emerged around the dopant atoms11, 12, 15. Despite these observations, the origin of the pseudogap in this J eff = 1/2 cuprate analog remains elusive. A roadblock to understanding this state is that its temperature evolution is not currently well defined. Although the ARPES data of K-deposited Sr2IrO4 suggested that the pseudogap developed at T * ≈ 110 K9, the temperature evolution of the pseudogap state is not included in the STS study on K-deposited Sr2IrO4 11 and the ARPES/STS studies in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 10, 12.
Infrared spectroscopy is well suited for investigating anomalous charge dynamics in correlated electron materials. Indeed infrared spectroscopy played critical roles in documenting the pseudogap phase in cuprates16,17,18,19,20,21, where for instance the electronic pseudogap inferred from nuclear magnetic resonance experiments was first identified in c-axis infrared conductivity data of YBa2Cu3O6+δ 16. Therefore infrared spectroscopy experiments could shed valuable insights on the nature of the charge transport and the pseudogap phase in electron doped Sr2IrO4, potentially providing a useful comparator to cuprates as well. However, to the best of our knowledge, no infrared spectroscopic study in carrier-doped Sr2IrO4 has been reported before.
In this paper, we investigate the ab-plane (IrO2 plane) electronic response in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 (x = 0, 0.021, and 0.067) by using infrared spectroscopy. We observe that (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 undergoes a filling-controlled insulator-to-metal transition with La doping. Quantitative analyses on the evolution of the charge dynamics of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 show that the change in the optical excitation energy between the J eff = 1/2 Hubbard bands is negligible while its intensity is suppressed, indicating the robustness of the electronic correlations in electron-doped Sr2IrO4. The far-infrared conductivity of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 reveals a hallmark of the pseudogap: a gradual depletion of the conductivity below a threshold frequency quantifying the magnitude of the pseudogap 2ΔPG ≈ 17 meV. The evolution of the conductivity data associated with the formation of the pseudogap is quite similar to the phenomenology in the c-axis pseudogap of the underdoped cuprates16, 22, 23. At high temperatures, the spectral shape of the far-infrared conductivity in (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 is nearly frequency independent, indicating a bad metallic nature. With decreasing temperature across 100 K, the conductivity below 20 meV is gradually depressed, revealing the threshold structure. The temperature at which the pseudogap develops T * ≈ 100 K coincides with the previously reported onset temperature of short-range antiferromagnetic order15. Our results suggest that the pseudogap in electron-doped Sr2IrO4 arises from strong electronic correlations and persistent short-range antiferromagnetism.
Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the reflectivity spectra R(ω) of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 at various temperatures. The evolution of the low-energy R(ω) indicates an insulator-to-metal transition with electron doping. The far-infrared reflectivity spectra of Sr2IrO4, shown in the inset of Fig. 1(a), are dominated by sharp spikes due to infrared-active phonon modes. Two humps located at about 0.5 and 1 eV correspond to the optical excitations between the J eff bands1, 24, 25. Upon electron doping, R(ω) below 0.1 eV acquires a spectral shape that rises toward lower frequency, indicating an electronic conduction. While the two humps at about 0.5 and 1 eV persist in (Sr0.979La0.021)2IrO4 [Fig. 1(b)], the lower-energy one appears to be suppressed in (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 [Fig. 1(c)]. For (Sr0.979La0.021)2IrO4, the far-infrared R(ω) decreases continuously with decreasing temperature [inset of Fig. 1(b)], signaling an incoherent nature of the charge transport. The low-energy R(ω) of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 displays an anomalous temperature dependence [inset of Fig. 1(c)]. As the temperature decreases from 300 K to 100 K, the magnitude of R(ω) increases, which indicates an enhancement of the response from the itinerant carriers. However, as the temperature is lowered below 100 K, R(ω) below about 20 meV is suppressed. This feature is associated with the formation of a pseudogap.
Figure 2 displays the real part of the optical conductivity σ 1(ω) spectra of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4. The optical conductivity of Sr2IrO4 shows the characteristic two-peak structure of the J eff = 1/2 Mott insulator. The degeneracy of d orbitals of the iridium ions is broken by the cooperation of crystal field and spin-orbit coupling forming J eff states. The on-site Coulomb repulsion U splits the J eff = 1/2 band into a lower Hubbard band (LHB) and an upper Hubbard band (UHB). Two peaks at about 0.5 eV and 1 eV labeled as α and β correspond to the transitions from the LHB to UHB and from the J eff = 3/2 bands to the J eff = 1/2 UHB, respectively1, 24, 25.
Electron doping induces the appearance of spectral weight (SW) below the Mott gap. The conductivity data of (Sr0.979La0.021)2IrO4 in Fig. 2(b) show a weak ingap excitation (peak I) centered at about 0.2 eV. It is interesting to note that the α and β peaks are robust against 4.2% electron doping. An increase in the doping concentration up to 13.4% electrons/Ir (x = 0.067) causes a significant enhancement of the ingap excitation and a concomitant suppression of the peak α [Fig. 2(c)], in contrast to the barely altered peak β. In the energy region below 0.1 eV, σ 1(ω) at high temperature exhibits a weak Drude-like response, where the conductivity of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 below 0.1 eV rises slightly toward lower frequency. The evolution of this electronic response upon doping will be discussed later in detail.
A closer inspection of the low-energy σ 1(ω) of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 reveals an infrared hallmark of the pseudogap, i.e., a gradual depletion of the conductivity with decreasing temperature16, 22, 23. In general terms, the pseudogap means a depletion of density of states26, 27. Thus the formation of the pseudogap implies the suppression of the optical conductivity below the energy of the pseudogap 2ΔPG. In Fig. 3(a), the optical conductivity below 50 meV is shown to highlight the pseudogap formation in (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4. The conductivity below the cutoff frequency of our experiments (dashed lines) were obtained by the Kramers-Kronig analysis of R(ω) with Hagen-Rubens low-energy extrapolation28 [See the Method section for details]. We stress that different extrapolation methods produce negligible variation in σ 1(ω) in the energy region covered in our experiments. Although the presence of the phonon modes complicates the correct identification of the spectral shape, the formation of the pseudogap is evident. The magnitude of σ 1(ω) below 50 meV increases with decreasing temperature from 300 K to 100 K. With further cooling below 100 K, the magnitude of σ 1(ω) above 20 meV keeps increasing, in stark contrast to the suppression of σ 1(ω) below 20 meV.
The formation of the pseudogap is better manifested after subtraction of the phonon contribution from the conductivity spectra [Fig. 3(b)]. Sr2IrO4 adopts the K2NiF4-type structure with I41/acd space group15. Group theory predicts six infrared-active phonon modes29, 30, which is consistent with the number of observed phonon modes in our σ 1(ω) [insets of Fig. 2]. The highest-energy mode at 82 meV corresponds to the stretching mode of the Ir-O bond. The other five phonon modes exist below 50 meV. Three external modes below 20 meV are related to the vibrations of the Sr ions against IrO6 octahedra and the remaining two bending modes at 35 and 45 meV are related to the modulation of the Ir-O-Ir bond angle25, 29, 30. The Drude-Lorentz oscillator model is employed to analyze the optical conductivity28, 31. The external phonon modes were fitted by three Lorentz oscillators. The electronic contribution to σ 1(ω) at 300, 200, and 100 K (75, 50, and 10 K) was simulated by a broad Drude oscillator (a Drude and two Lorentz oscillators). Then the contribution from the external modes was subtracted from σ 1(ω) to emphasize the sole electronic component to the conductivity in the low energy region [Fig. 3(b)]. Although the spectra are noisy, the phonon peaks can be isolated based on the comparison with σ 1(ω) of Sr2IrO4 and (Sr0.979La0.021)2IrO4 where the phonon modes are distinct [insets of Fig. 2(a) and (b)]. At 300 K, the optical conductivity spectrum below 0.05 eV is almost flat other than a slight rise toward lower frequencies, suggesting the incoherent character of the charge transport. As the temperature decreases to 100 K, the magnitude of σ 1(ω) increases continuously. In contrast, with the further lowering of temperature below 100 K, σ 1(ω) below 20 meV is suppressed, which is consistent with the behavior of the resistivity data15. The conductivity data at 50 and 10 K display a clear gap region below about 17 meV. It should be noted that σ 1(ω) above 20 meV is enhanced along with the pseudogap formation. This observation signals a transfer of the SW into higher energies. The temperature evolution of σ 1(ω) indicates that the magnitude of the pseudogap 2ΔPG is about 17 meV and the temperature T * below which the pseudogap develops is about 100 K.
It is interesting to note that the pseudogap behavior discovered in the ab-plane response of electron-doped Sr2IrO4 is similar to that of the c-axis pseudogap of underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+δ (YBCO)16, 17. The c-axis conductivity of the underdoped cuprates is characterized by a featureless incoherent far-infrared response. The pseudogap was manifested by a gradual depletion of the c-axis conductivity below certain energy with decreasing temperature. Such change leads to the development of a threshold structure at 2ΔPG 16, 17. The SW removed from the energy region below the pseudogap is shifted to higher energies22, 32, 33. Conversely, the signature of the pseudogap in the cuprates cannot be clearly identified from the in-plane optical conductivity due to the dominance of the coherent Drude-like peak but is represented by a drop in the frequency-dependent scattering rate below 2ΔPG 23. The bad metallic character of the ab-plane response of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 may enable the identification of the pseudogap behavior from our conductivity data.
Aside from the similarities, a quantitative difference exists in the energy scale of the SW transfer due to the formation of the pseudogap in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 and the cuprates. In the underdoped cuprates, the energy scale of the SW transfer significantly exceeds the magnitude of the pseudogap22, 32, 33. In contrast, the conductivity data of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 clearly demonstrate that the SW is only shifted to the region close to the pseudogap energy; σ 1(ω) right above 2ΔPG is enhanced with the opening of the pseudogap. In order to estimate the energy scale of the redistribution of the SW due to the formation of the pseudogap, we analyzed the temperature dependence of the \(SW(\omega )={\int }_{0}^{\omega }{\sigma }_{1}(\omega \text{'})d\omega \text{'}\) in the temperature region below T * ≈ 100 K. As shown in Fig. 3(c), the SW(ω) at ω < 2ΔPG decreases upon entering the pseudogap phase. At ω > 2ΔPG, the SW(ω) at lower temperatures increases more rapidly with increasing energy which indicates the accumulation of the SW in the corresponding energy region. In Fig. 3(d), the temperature dependence of the SW(17 meV) and SW(100 meV) normalized to the corresponding 100 K SW’s are shown, from which we find that the formation of the pseudogap removes about 17% of the spectral weight below 2ΔPG ≈ 17 meV and the sum rule is satisfied up to about 100 meV.
It is worthwhile comparing the infrared pseudogap to those revealed by other experimental techniques. An ARPES measurement on (Sr0.95La0.05)2IrO4 reported that the magnitude of the pseudogap at the antinodal point was 2ΔPG ≈ 50 meV10. A STM experiment on (Sr0.945La0.055)2IrO4 suggested 2ΔPG ≈ 70–300 meV12. These scales of the pseudogap are larger than the estimation from our infrared data. This may be attributed to the difference of the doping level. The La doping concentration of our sample is 6.7% which is larger than that of the crystals measured by the ARPES10 and STM12 studies. An ARPES measurement on surface-electron-doped Sr2IrO4 showed that the magnitude of the pseudogap decreases with increasing doping concentrations9. As the surface coverage increases from 0.5 monolayer to 0.7 monolayer which corresponds to the increase of electron doping concentration by about 8% in K-deposited Sr2IrO4, the magnitude of the pseudogap decreases from 80 meV to 20 meV. Assuming the linear relationship between the electron doping and the magnitude of the pseudogap, the ~8 meV decrease in the magnitude of the pseudogap per 1% extra electron doping should be respected. The electron doping concentration of our sample is 2x = 13.4% electrons/Ir which is 3.4% larger than 2x = 10% of the sample used in the ARPES study10. Therefore, the magnitude of the pseudogap of our sample is expected to be about 30 meV smaller than that of ~50 meV from the ARPES study, resulting in a magnitude of about 20 meV which is consistent with our observation.
The temperature T * ≈ 100 K at which the pseudogap develops in our data provides a clue on the origin of the pseudogap. Recent magnetization and neutron scattering experiments in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 revealed that while long-range antiferromagnetic order collapses beyond x = 0.02, short-range order survives up to the highest doping concentrations15. The onset temperature of the short-range antiferromagnetic order T SRO in (Sr0.94La0.06)2IrO4 is about 125 K and further decreases with increasing x. Thus, the T SRO in (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 is expected to be in the vicinity of 100 K where the pseudogap emerges. This correlation suggests that the short-range antiferromagnetic order may be responsible for the infrared pseudogap.
In order to gain more insights on the pseudogap as well as the electronic response in the (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 system, we now elaborate on the doping evolution of σ 1(ω) at 10 K [Fig. 4(a)]. The doping-induced changes in σ 1(ω) are limited in the energy region below 0.6 eV where the excitation between the J eff = 1/2 bands is the main contributor. We analyzed σ 1(ω) by using the Drude-Lorentz oscillator model28, 31:
The first and second terms represent the Drude and the Lorentz oscillators, respectively. S D and γ D (S j and γ j ) denote the strength and the scattering rate of the Drude (Lorentz) oscillator, respectively. ω j in the second term denotes the resonance frequency of the Lorentz oscillator. The strength of the oscillator is proportional to its SW. Figure 4(c–e) show the results of the Drude-Lorentz oscillator analysis. We first note that the positions of the peaks α and β do not change evidently with x in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 [Fig. 4(c)]. On the other hand, the SW’s of the optical excitations exhibit a significant doping evolution. At x = 0.021, the SW’s of the peaks α and β slightly diminish and a weak ingap excitation appears [Fig. 4(d)]. As x increases to 0.067, the peak α is drastically suppressed and the peak I acquires the SW, whereas the SW of the peak β is almost untouched.
The negligible shift of the peaks α and β revealed in our analysis suggests that the magnitude of the electronic correlations does not vary appreciably with electron doping, which has an implication on recent discussions on the role of the electronic correlations in La-doped Sr2IrO4. An ARPES experiment on (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 reported that the Mott gap closed due to the merging between the J eff = 1/2 LHB and UHB with electron doping10. This observation was attributed to the reduction of the on-site Coulomb repulsion U. However, the first-principles calculation study pointed out that U did not change noticeably at low dopings and could only be fully suppressed upon 80% electron doping34. Another ARPES study showed that the J eff = 1/2 bands were consistently separated upon electron doping. It was also observed that the photoemission intensity due to the J eff = 1/2 LHB was suppressed significantly and the SW was shifted into the gap while the intensity from the J eff = 3/2 bands did not change evidently35. Our data agree with the latter ARPES result and suggest that the electronic correlations remain robust against electron doping in the (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 system. An observation of the phase separated state in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 also supports the persistence of the electronic correlations12.
Dynamical mean-field theory study of the optical responses in several cuprates suggested that the degree of the electronic correlations can be estimated from the temperature dependence of the low-energy spectral weight36, 37. Toschi et al. found that the spectral weight followed a quadratic temperature dependence
for any infrared cutoff below which intraband responses are main contributors to σ 1(ω)36, 37. The electronic correlations were manifested in an unexpectedly large magnitude of the coefficient B(Ω = ω p) where ω p is the plasma frequency. The plasma frequency of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 obtained from the fit of σ 1(ω) is about 1.4 eV where the contribution from the interband transition, the peak β, is significant. Therefore one cannot apply the equation (2) with Ω = ω p to (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 for assessing the degree of the electronic correlations. The SW(Ω = 0.05 eV) decreases with increasing the temperature. However, the quadratic temperature dependence is not evident. We can observe a signature of the electronic correlations in the SW(Ω = 0.5 eV, T) data which includes the contribution from the intraband responses, i.e., the Drude-like mode and the ingap excitaiton. We find that the SW(Ω = 0.5 eV, T) increases at higher temperatures [Fig. 3(e)], which indicates the incoherent nature of the low-energy electronic response of (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 possibly due to the electronic correlations38.
A direct comparison between σ 1(ω) of the single-layer (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 and the bilayer (Sr1−x La x )3Ir2O7 systems further highlights the importance of the electronic correlations in the charge dynamics of the single-layer system. Figures 4(a) and (b) illustrate that (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 has a stronger propensity for localizing the doped charge carriers. Although less electrons are doped in (Sr0.949La0.051)3Ir2O7 (7.65% electrons/Ir doping) than in (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4 (13.4% electrons/Ir doping), a coherent Drude-like peak without any trace of the pseudogap is registered in the bilayer compound39. The evolutions of the SW’s of the peaks α and β also support the notion of the stronger tendency for charge localization in the single-layer system. Figure 4(e) displays the changes in the SW’s of the peaks α and β of the two systems which are normalized to those of their corresponding parent compounds. The SW’s of the peaks α and β in (Sr0.977La0.023)3Ir2O7 (3.45% electrons/Ir doping) decrease by about 50% and 33%, respectively. On the other hand, the SW’s of the two peaks in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 decrease substantially slowly. The SW’s of the peaks α and β in (Sr0.979La0.021)2IrO4 (4.2% electrons/Ir doping) are suppressed by about 19% and 5% respectively, suggesting the strong influence of the electronic correlations for inhibiting the delocalization of the doped electrons.
The distinct behavior of σ 1(ω) in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 compared to that of (Sr1−x La x )3Ir2O7 may be attributed to the weaker mixing between the spin-orbit split J eff = 1/2 and 3/2 in the former system. In the Ruddlesden-Popper series iridates Sr n+1Ir n O3n+1, the dimension determined by n can control the effective bandwidth of the J eff bands. The increase in the dimensionality enhances the interlayer coupling and the mixing between the J eff = 1/2 and 3/2 bands40. Thus, the effective bandwidth of the J eff bands scale with n. The current observations indicate that only the J eff = 1/2 bands are relevant for the low-energy charge dynamics in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4. This suggests that the mixing is negligible and the magnitude of the effective electronic correlations defined by the ratio of U to the bandwidth W is the strongest in the single-layer system. The suppressions of the peaks α and β with electron doping in the bilayer system can be naturally explained in terms of the increase in the mixture and the effective bandwidth of the J eff bands with increasing n.
Conclusion
The electronic response of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 (x = 0, 0.021, and 0.067) upon electron doping is explored by infrared spectroscopy. The conductivity data show that the energy value of the Mott-gap excitation, i.e., the optical transition between the J eff = 1/2 Hubbard bands remains almost untouched across the filling-controlled insulator-to-metal transition. It is established that only the optical excitation between the J eff = 1/2 Hubbard bands was suppressed by electron doping, which is in sharp contrast to the behavior of σ 1(ω) in (Sr1−x La x )3Ir2O7 where the optical excitation from the J eff = 3/2 bands to the J eff = 1/2 upper Hubbard band is also suppressed. In metallic (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4, the low-energy conductivity spectra are dominated by incoherent excitations. All these observations suggest the persistence of the strong electronic correlations upon electron doping in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4. The signature of the pseudogap is identified in the conductivity data of the bad metallic compound (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4, where a gradual depletion of the far-infrared conductivity with decreasing the temperature below T * ≈ 100 K is observed. The magnitude of the infrared pseudogap 2ΔPG at this concentration is found to be about 17 meV and the pseudogap temperature T * estimated from the data is in the vicinity of the onset temperature of the short-range antiferromagnetic order15. Our work indicates that the strong electronic correlations and remnant antiferromagnetism are responsible for the pseudogap in (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4.
Methods
Single crystals of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4 (x = 0, 0.021, and 0.067) were grown using flux technique. Stoichiometry and the La concentrations were checked by energy dispersive spectroscopy measurements. Details of the growth and the characterizations of the single crystals were described in ref. 15. We measured the ab-plane reflectivity spectra R(ω) in the energy region between 10 meV and 1 eV as a function of temperature by using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker vertex 70 v). To compensate the effect of rough surfaces, we use in-situ gold overcoating technique41. We measured the temperature-dependent dielectric constants in the energy region between 1 and 5 eV by using spectroscopic ellipsometer (VASE, J. A. Woollam Co.). We obtained the complex optical conductivity by the Kramers-Kronig analysis28. For the extrapolation of R(ω) below 10 meV for insulating Sr2IrO4, constant values that match with the magnitude of R(ω = 10 meV) were chosen28. The Hagen-Rubens relation28 was used for the low-energy extrapolation of R(ω) for (Sr0.979La0.021)2IrO4 and (Sr0.933La0.067)2IrO4. We verified that the conductivity data at ω ≥ 10 meV did not depend on the extrapolation methods.
References
Kim, B. J. et al. Novel J eff = 1/2 Mott state induced by relativistic spin-orbit coupling in Sr2IrO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076402 (2008).
Kim, B. J. et al. Phase-Sensitive Observation of a Spin-Orbital Mott State in Sr2IrO4. Science 323, 1329–1332 (2009).
Fujiyama, S. et al. Two-dimensional Heisenberg behavior of J eff = 1/2 isospins in the paramagnetic state of the spin-orbital Mott insulator Sr2IrO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 247212 (2012).
Kim, J. et al. Magnetic excitation spectra of Sr2IrO4 probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering: establishing links to cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 177003 (2012).
Wang, F. & Senthil, T. Twisted Hubbard model for Sr2IrO4: magnetism and possible high temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 136402 (2011).
Watanabe, H., Shirakawa, T. & Yunoki, S. Monte Carlo study of an unconventional superconducting phase in iridium oxide J eff = 1/2 Mott insulators induced by carrier doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 027002 (2013).
Meng, Z. Y., Kim, Y. B. & Kee, H. Y. Odd-parity triplet superconducting phase in multiorbital materials with a strong spin-orbit coupling: application to doped Sr2IrO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 177003 (2014).
Kim, Y. K., Sung, N. H., Denlinger, J. D. & Kim, B. J. Observation of a d-wave gap in electron-doped Sr2IrO4. Nat. Phys. 12, 37–41 (2015).
Kim, Y. K. et al. Fermi arcs in a doped pseudospin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Science 345, 187–190 (2014).
de la Torre, A. et al. Collapse of the Mott Gap and Emergence of a Nodal Liquid in Lightly Doped Sr2IrO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 176402 (2015).
Yan, Y. J. et al. Electron-Doped Sr2IrO4: An Analogue of Hole-Doped Cuprate Superconductors Demonstrated by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041018 (2015).
Battisti, I. et al. Universality of pseudogap and emergent order in lightly doped Mott insulators. Nat. Phys. 13, 21–25 (2016).
Cao, Y. et al. Hallmarks of the Mott-metal crossover in the hole-doped pseudospin-1/2 Mott insulator Sr2IrO4. Nat. Commun. 7, 11367 (2016).
Zhao, L. et al. Evidence of an odd-parity hidden order in a spin-orbit coupled correlated iridate. Nat. Phys. 12, 32–36 (2016).
Chen, X. et al. Influence of electron doping on the ground state of (Sr1−x La x )2IrO4. Phys. Rev. B 92, 075125 (2015).
Homes, C. C., Timusk, T., Liang, R., Bonn, D. A. & Hardy, W. N. Optical conductivity of c axis oriented YBa2Cu3O6.70: Evidence for a pseudogap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1645–1648 (1993).
Basov, D. N., Timusk, T., Dabrowski, B. & Jorgensen, J. D. c-axis response of YBa2Cu4O8: A pseudogap and possibility of Josephson coupling of CuO2 planes. Phys. Rev. B 50, 3511–3514 (1994).
Basov, D. N. et al. Pseudogap and charge dynamics in CuO2 planes in YBCO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4090–4093 (1996).
Puchkov, A. V. et al. Evolution of the pseudogap state of high-T c superconductors with doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3212–3215 (1996).
Startseva, T. et al. Temperature evolution of the pseudogap state in the infrared response of underdoped La2−x Sr x CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 59, 7184–7190 (1999).
Lee, Y. S. et al. Electrodynamics of the nodal metal state in weakly doped high-T c cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 72, 054529 (2005).
Uchida, S., Tamasaku, K. & Tajima, S. c-axis optical spectral and charge dynamics in La2−x Sr x CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 53, 14558–14574 (1996).
Basov, D. N. & Timusk, T. Electrodynamics of high-T c superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 721–779 (2005).
Moon, S. J. et al. Dimensionality-controlled insulator-metal transition and correlated metallic state in 5d transition metal oxides Sr n+1Ir n O3n+1 (n = 1, 2, and ∞). Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226402 (2008).
Moon, S. J. et al. Temperature dependence of the electronic structure of the J eff = 1/2 Mott insulator Sr2IrO4 studied by optical spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 80, 195110 (2009).
Timusk, T. & Statt, B. The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey. Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 61 (1999).
Basov, D. N., Averitt, R. D., van der Marel, D., Dressel, M. & Haule, K. Electrodynamics of correlated electron materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 471–541 (2011).
Wooten, F. Optical Properties of Solids. (Academic Press, New York, 1972).
Pintschovius, L. et al. Lattice dynamics of La2NiO4. Phys. Rev. B 40, 2229–2238 (1989).
Tajima, S. et al. Optical-phonon study of single crystals of various layered cuprates and related materials: Evidence of unique electron-phonon coupling in the CuO2 plane. Phys. Rev. B 43, 10496–10507 (1991).
Dressel, M. & Grüner, G. Electrodynamics of solids: optical properties of electrons in matter. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2002).
Puchkov, A. V., Basov, D. N. & Timusk, T. The pseudogap state in high-T c superconductors: an infrared study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 10049–10082 (1996).
Uykur, E., Tanaka, K., Masui, T., Miyasaka, S. & Tajima, S. Persistence of the superconducting condensate far above the critical temperature of YBa2(Cu,Zn)3Oy revealed by c-axis optical conductivity measurements for several Zn concentrations and carrier doping levels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 127003 (2014).
Liu, P. et al. Electron and hole doping in the relativistic Mott insulator Sr2IrO4: A first-principles study using band unfolding technique. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195145 (2016).
Brouet, V. et al. Transfer of spectral weight across the gap of Sr2IrO4 induced by La doping. Phys. Rev. B 92, 081117 (2015).
Toschi, A. et al. Temperature dependence of the optical spectral weight in the cuprates: role of electron correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 097002 (2005).
Toschi, A. & Capone, M. Optical sum rule anomalies in the cuprates: Interplay between strong correlation and electronic band structure. Phys. Rev. B. 77, 014518 (2008).
Di Pietro, P., Hoffman, J., Bhattacharya, A., Lupi, S. & Perucchi, A. Spectral Weight Redistribution in (LaNiO3) n /(LaMnO3)2 Superlattices from Optical Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 156801 (2015).
Ahn, G., Song, S. J., Hogan, T., Wilson, S. D. & Moon, S. J. Infrared Spectroscopic Evidences of Strong Electronic Correlations in (Sr1−xLax)3Ir2O7. Sci. Rep. 6, 32632 (2016).
Carter, J.-M., Shankar, V. V. & Kee, H.-Y. Theory of metal-insulator transition in the family of perovskite iridium oxides. Phys. Rev. B 88, 035111 (2013).
Homes, C. C., Reedyk, M., Cradles, D. A. & Timusk, T. Technique for measuring the reflectance of irregular, submillimeter-sized samples. Appl. Opt. 32, 2976–2983 (1993).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (2014R1A2A1A11054351 and 2017R1A2B4009413). This work was supported in part by NSF Award No. DMR-1505549 (S.D.W. and X.C.). Part of this study has been performed using facilities at IBS Center for Correlated Electron Systems, Seoul National University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.H.S., G.H.A., and S.J.S. performed the experiments. J.H.S. and S.J.M. analyzed the data. X.C. and S.D.W. prepared and characterized the samples. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, J.H., Ahn, G.H., Song, S.J. et al. Infrared probe of pseudogap in electron-doped Sr2IrO4 . Sci Rep 7, 10494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10725-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10725-z
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Effects of the on-site energy on the electronic response of Sr3(Ir1−xMnx)2O7
Scientific Reports (2022)