Abstract
The use of cost-effective vaccines capable of inducing robust CD8+ T cell immunity will contribute significantly towards the elimination of persistent viral infections and cancers worldwide. We have previously reported that a cytolytic DNA vaccine encoding an immunogen and a truncated mouse perforin (PRF) protein significantly augments anti-viral T cell (including CD8+ T cell) immunity. Thus, the current study investigated whether this vaccine enhances activation of dendritic cells (DCs) resulting in greater priming of CD8+ T cell immunity. In vitro data showed that transfection of HEK293T cells with the cytolytic DNA resulted in the release of lactate dehydrogenase, indicative of necrotic/lytic cell death. In vitro exposure of this lytic cell debris to purified DCs from naïve C57BL/6 mice resulted in maturation of DCs as determined by up-regulation of CD80/CD86. Using activation/proliferation of adoptively transferred OT-I CD8+ T cells to measure antigen presentation by DCs in vivo, it was determined that cytolytic DNA immunisation resulted in a time-dependent increase in the proliferation of OT-I CD8+ T cells compared to canonical DNA immunisation. Overall, the data suggest that the cytolytic DNA vaccine increases the activity of DCs which has important implications for the design of DNA vaccines to improve their translational prospects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
DNA is an ideal platform to develop global vaccines because it is safe, cheap to manufacture rapidly and stable even in ambient temperatures. Furthermore, a landmark phase IIb clinical trial demonstrated that electroporation of a DNA vaccine (VGX-3100) was capable of eliciting immunity to clear human papillomavirus (HPV) and completely regress HPV-induced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in humans1. Although the protective mechanism of this vaccine is still not clear, it is likely that cell death and inflammation resulting from electroporation at the vaccination site are contributing factors to its efficacy2.
Several studies from our laboratory suggest that DNA vaccines designed to induce necrosis of vaccine-targeted cells elicit greater T cell immunity and protection than canonical DNA vaccines following intradermal (ID) immunisation3,4,5,6. In these studies, expression of the immunogen was driven by the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter while the simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter drove expression of a cytolytic protein, truncated mouse perforin (PRF). The CMV promoter is ∼10-fold more efficient in driving gene expression than the SV40 promoter3 and the encoded PRF contains a 12 amino acid deletion (12del PRF) at the C-terminus, resulting in cell death after expression7. This bicistronic plasmid design allows the immunogen to accumulate significantly within vaccine-targeted cells before necrosis occurs due to 12del PRF expression. Necrotic cell death results in release of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which act as natural adjuvants and result in inflammation and activation of antigen presenting cells (APCs)8. Dendritic cells (DCs) are APCs that are pivotal to initiate CD8+ T cell immunity and are the most efficient APC at cross-presenting antigens including antigens derived from dead cells9. Consequently, in this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the cytolytic DNA vaccine will activate DCs to cross-present antigens to CD8+ T cells more efficiently than canonical DNA vaccines which are non-cytolytic.
Results and Discussion
DCs exposed to necrotic or lytic cell environments mature and cross-present antigens to CD8+ T cells more efficiently than DCs exposed to healthy or apoptotic cells10,11,12 and the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from cells is indicative of lytic/necrotic cell death13. Consequently, to investigate whether expression of the truncated mouse perforin, 12del PRF, encoded by the bicistronic DNA vaccine resulted in lytic cell death, the release of LDH from transfected HEK293T cells was measured (Fig. 1A). In this experiment, the bicistronic DNA encoded the non-structural protein 3 (NS3) from hepatitis C virus as the immunogen. A mutant form of 12del PRF with a D483A mutation which renders PRF non-cytolytic7, 14 served as a control for these experiments. Transfection of HEK293T cells with the bicistronic DNA encoding 12del PRF, but not wild-type (WT) PRF, significantly increased LDH release from transfected cells compared to the control (NS3-12del D483A PRF) (Fig. 1A). In contrast, treatment of HEK293T cells with a pro-apoptotic drug, doxorubicin, failed to result in LDH release (Fig. 1A). Thus, only expression of 12del PRF from the bicistronic DNA vaccine resulted in significant necrotic cell death. These results are consistent with previous reports demonstrating the lytic activity of 12del PRF5, 7 and with the general understanding that apoptosis which fails to result in the release of DAMPs is non-inflammatory whereas necrosis not only results in the release of DAMPs, but is inflammatory leading to increased immunogenicity8.
Next, to examine if DCs are activated following exposure of lytic cell debris resulting from 12del PRF expression, HEK293T cells were transfected with cytolytic- or control- DNA encoding the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA). These cells were then exposed to purified DCs from naïve C57BL/6 mice. This experiment showed that DCs (gated based on the expression of CD11c and Major Histocompatibility Complex Class (MHC-C) II (CD11c+ I-Ab+)) including the cross-presenting CD8α+ subset, which were exposed to HEK293T cells transfected with the cytolytic DNA expressed higher levels of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86, indicative of maturation, compared to DCs exposed to HEK293T cells transfected with control DNA (Fig. 1B and C). However, expression of the immunodominant peptide, SIINFEKL-H2-Kb, was not detected in these DC-HEK293T co-cultures (Fig. 1D). This was not surprising because the 25-D1.16 antibody fails to detect low levels of SIINFEKL-H2-Kb expression and is the only antibody available to quantify this peptide- MHC-CI complex on murine cells9. Staining for SIINFEKL-H2-Kb was observed only for DC subsets analysed in co-cultures involving heat-treated necrotic cells (as described in Materials and Methods) in the presence of 0.1 μg/ml SIINFEKL peptide (positive control) (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, the in vitro data (Fig. 1B,C) suggest that exposure of lytic cell debris resulting from cytolytic DNA expression can trigger maturation of DCs.
Proliferation of adoptively transferred carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labelled OT-I CD8+ T cells which present OVA epitopes, e.g. SIINFEKL, in recipient mice in the context of MHC-CI is commonly used to quantify antigen presentation by DC in vivo 15. Thus, this method was used to determine whether cytolytic DNA immunisation could augment antigen presentation by DCs to CD8+ T cells in vivo (Fig. 2). The data show that immunisation with cytolytic DNA failed to increase the number of proliferating C57BL/6 Rag −/− OT-I CD8+ T cells in the draining cervical lymph nodes (CLN) compared to the control when early phases of antigen presentation (days 4-8) were examined (Fig. 2). Similar results were generated when C57BL/6 OT-I CD8+ T cells (as opposed to C57BL/6 Rag−/− OT-I cells (CD45.2+)) were used for adoptive transfer and proliferation of these cells was examined 0–7 days following DNA immunisation (data not shown). However, we have demonstrated previously that cell death in vivo was detected 14 days after ID immunisation with cytolytic DNA3 and antigen presentation following ID DNA immunisation can be detected for at least 21 days post-immunisation16.
Consequently, we examined antigen presentation occurring from 7–22 days following ID immunisation with cytolytic or control DNA. As a positive control, one day after the adoptive transfer of OT-I cells into naïve recipient mice (n = 2), 20 μg SIINFEKL peptide +5 μg of LPS were injected ID per mouse prior to analysis 14 days later. LPS promotes maturation of antigen presenting cells and SIINFEKL injection is commonly used in adoptive transfer experiments to ensure that OT-I CD8+ T cells in recipients retain the capacity to proliferate and to delineate proliferating cells during flow cytometric analysis17. The results of these experiments show that cytolytic DNA immunisation increased the number of proliferating OT-I CD8+ T cells (CD45.2+) by ∼2-fold in the CLN as well as the spleen compared to the 12del D483A PRF control (Fig. 3). These findings are consistent with our previous report which demonstrated that a higher proportion of mature cross-presenting (i.e. CD8α+ CD80+) DCs emerge in the CLN 14 days following ID immunisation with cytolytic DNA compared to canonical DNA3. Furthermore, the increase in antigen presentation due to cytolytic DNA vaccination is consistent with our earlier reports which demonstrated that cytolytic DNA vaccination greatly enhances anti-viral effector CD8+ T cell immunity3,4,5,6. Thus, the data suggest that cytolytic DNA more efficiently activates DCs to present vaccine-encoded antigens to CD8+ T cells in vivo, compared to canonical DNA vaccination.
DCs are crucial to initiate CD8+ T cell immunity, but, being a rare cell population, direct targeting of DCs is difficult unless proteins/antibodies recognizing cell surface molecules (e.g. DEC205) are tagged on the DNA or lipid molecules (e.g. liposomes) are used to encapsulate DNA18. However, the use of protein or antibody tags increases the manufacturing and storage costs of the vaccine, and despite the potential of these strategies, none has resulted in widespread use2. Immunity against the protein tags can also develop resulting in reduced efficacy of the vaccine following booster vaccinations6. Consequently, alternative strategies to target DNA-encoded antigens to DCs are required and the findings from the current study suggest that cytolytic DNA encoding 12del PRF can be used to deliver vaccine-encoded antigens effectively to DCs in an indirect manner and enhance antigen presentation to naïve CD8+ T cells in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 4).
Following ID delivery of canonical DNA, antigen delivery to DCs is crucial to prime naïve CD8+ T cells; this may occur after direct transfection of DCs although antigen transfer/shedding from transfected fibroblasts/keratinocytes or DCs uptake of antigen derived from dead cells may also contribute to some degree19,20,21 (Fig. 4B). However, the vast majority of the cells in the dermis are fibroblasts and keratinocytes, and consequently, the bulk of the DNA delivered to this site will likely transfect these cells (Fig. 4). Consequently, cross-presentation is necessary to efficiently prime naïve CD8+ T cells and it is most likely that this mechanism of antigen presentation is exploited more effectively following cytolytic DNA vaccination compared to canonical DNA vaccination (Fig. 4). A caveat for the model described in Fig. 4 is that it is based on ID delivery of canonical or cytolytic DNA into the ear pinnae. It is possible that the method of antigen presentation to CD8+ T cells will vary depending on the route or mode of delivery of DNA22,23,24,25.
It is unclear which DC subsets cross-present antigen to CD8+ T cells following cytolytic DNA immunisation, but based on previous reports it is unlikely that Langerhan cells are required for cross-presentation26. It is likely that langerin+ dermal DCs27, CD8α+ and/or CD103+ DC subsets28, 29 are involved, but this requires further investigation.
DNA vaccines have historically failed to show efficacy in large animal models and humans owing mainly to poor immunogenicity and delivery of DNA into cells. The recent success of using DNA vaccines to treat cervical cancer patients1, 30 has reinvigorated the DNA vaccine research field. Furthermore, it is likely that a DNA vaccine will also emerge to protect against Zika virus infection in humans given that a plasmid DNA vaccine conferred protection in mice and macaques against Zika virus challenge31, 32. The cytolytic DNA vaccine encoding 12del PRF is also more immunogenic than canonical DNA vaccines in outbred pigs5, a recognised large animal in which to test the immunogenicity of experimental vaccines33. Consequently, these findings highlight exciting translational prospects for the cytolytic DNA to be used as a platform for designing vaccines against infectious diseases and cancer.
Materials and Methods
Mice
All experiments were approved and performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the University of Adelaide and the SA Pathology animal ethics committees. C57BL/6 and C57BL/6.SJL mice were of the 6J substrain and purchased from the Australian Resource Centre at Perth. C57BL/6 OT-I mice were purchased from the Australian Phenomics Facility at Canberra. Rag−/− C57BL/6 OT-I mice were bred in specific pathogen free conditions at the Sansom Institute for Health Research, Adelaide. All mice were housed in individually ventilated HEPA-filtered cages at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville.
DNA preparation and immunisations
The cytolytic DNA was constructed using the pVAX plasmid (Life Technologies) as described previously3. The genes for Gallus gallus ovalbumin (OVA) or codon-optimised NS34 were inserted downstream of the CMV promoter, and those for 12del PRF, 12del D483A PRF or WT PRF inserted downstream of the SV40 promoter. The different PRF sequences used are described in Brennan et al 7. All DNA vaccines were prepared using a well-established alkaline lysis method34 and endotoxins removed with an Endotoxin Removal Solution (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. A schematic diagram of the plasmid DNA constructs used in this study is shown in Fig. 5.
Aged matched (6–8 weeks old during initial vaccination) mice were under isofluorane anesthesia during ID DNA immunisations into the ear pinnae using a 29 G needle and syringe. Each mouse received 100 µg of endotoxin-free DNA in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (50 µg in 10 µl/ear). In the experiment described in Fig. 3, a proportion of the mice were immunised via the ID route with 20 μg SIINFEKL peptide +5 μg of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich) as a positive control.
LDH cytotoxicity assay
HEK293T cells were transfected with 200 ng of DNA in 96-well flat-bottom plates and LDH activity in the culture supernatant measured 48 hours later using the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Scientific Pierce) as we described5. Eight hours after transfection the Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Life Technologies) + 10% heat inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) which was used as cell culture medium during transfection was replaced with DMEM + 2% FBS. To induce apoptosis of HEK293T cells, cells were treated with 2 μM doxorubicin for 24 hours as described5. The percentage of maximum (specific LDH release) was calculated according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Scientific Pierce).
Adoptive transfer
Pooled splenocytes and lymph node cells from Rag−/− C57BL/6 OT-I or C57BL/6 OT-I mice were labelled with 10 or 30 μM CFSE (Molecular Probes) respectively as demonstrated17. After washing, red blood cells (RBC) were depleted in RBC lysis buffer (155 mM NH4Cl + 0.01 M Tris-HCl in Milli-Q water, pH 7.65), the labelled cells resuspended in PBS and injected intravenously (i.v.) into the lateral tail vein of C57BL/6.SJL vaccinated mice.
DC-HEK293T cell coculture
DCs were purified using splenocytes from naïve C57BL/6 mice using CD11c magnetic MicroBeads according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec). Prior to CD11c enrichment, the spleens were digested for 45 mins at room temperature using 100 mg/ml collagenase type 3 (Worthington) + 10 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich) in Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium (RPMI; Life Technologies) + 2% FBS.
HEK293T cells from 3 wells transfected with DNA as described above were cocultured for 8 hours at 37 °C + 5% CO2 with 1 × 105 purified DCs. As a positive control, naïve HEK293T cells (cultured for 48 hours) were incubated at 56 °C for 45 minutes to induce necrosis and cultured with 1 × 105 purified DCs in the presence of 0.1 μg/ml of SIINFEKL peptide. Following the coculture, the DCs were stained with antibodies that react against SIINFEKL-H-2Kb (25-D1.16, BioLegend), CD80 (eBioscience) and CD86 (BioLegend) to quantify antigen presentation (i.e. with 25-D1.16) and maturation (i.e. with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86) of the DCs using flow cytometric analysis. The SIINFEKL peptide used in this study was a gift from Dr. Charani Ranasinghe, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra.
Flow cytometry
Cell surface and intracellular staining was performed similar to that described in Holmes et al.35. Antibodies against mouse antigens CD8α, T cell receptor (TCR) Vβ5.1/5.2, CD80 and CD11c were purchased from eBioscience. Antibodies against mouse antigen I-Ab (MHC-CII) was from BD Pharmingen. All the other antibodies were purchased from BioLegend.
Statistical analysis
All graphs were constructed using GraphPad Prism 6 software and the p values of the data were calculated using a paired t-test or Kruskal-Wallis H test of the IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 24).
References
Trimble, C. L. et al. Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 386, 2078–2088 (2015).
Jorritsma, S. H., Gowans, E. J., Grubor-Bauk, B. & Wijesundara, D. K. Delivery methods to increase cellular uptake and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines. Vaccine 34, 5488–5494 (2016).
Gargett, T. et al. Induction of antigen-positive cell death by the expression of perforin, but not DTa, from a DNA vaccine enhances the immune response. Immunol Cell Biol 92, 359–367 (2014).
Gummow, J. et al. A Multiantigenic DNA Vaccine That Induces Broad Hepatitis C Virus-Specific T-Cell Responses in Mice. J Virol 89, 7991–8002 (2015).
Grubor-Bauk, B. et al. Intradermal delivery of DNA encoding HCV NS3 and perforin elicits robust cell-mediated immunity in mice and pigs. Gene Ther 23, 26–37 (2016).
Gargett, T. et al. Increase in DNA vaccine efficacy by virosome delivery and co-expression of a cytolytic protein. Clin Transl Immunology 3, e18 (2014).
Brennan, A. J. et al. Protection from endogenous perforin: glycans and the C terminus regulate exocytic trafficking in cytotoxic lymphocytes. Immunity 34, 879–892 (2011).
Kono, H. & Rock, K. L. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol 8, 279–289 (2008).
Joffre, O. P., Segura, E., Savina, A. & Amigorena, S. Cross-presentation by dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol 12, 557–569 (2012).
Melcher, A. et al. Tumor immunogenicity is determined by the mechanism of cell death via induction of heat shock protein expression. Nat Med 4, 581–587 (1998).
Gallucci, S., Lolkema, M. & Matzinger, P. Natural adjuvants: endogenous activators of dendritic cells. Nat Med 5, 1249–1255 (1999).
Sauter, B. et al. Consequences of cell death: exposure to necrotic tumor cells, but not primary tissue cells or apoptotic cells, induces the maturation of immunostimulatory dendritic cells. J Exp Med 191, 423–434 (2000).
Chan, F. K., Moriwaki, K. & De Rosa, M. J. Detection of necrosis by release of lactate dehydrogenase activity. Methods Mol Biol 979, 65–70 (2013).
Voskoboinik, I. et al. Calcium-dependent plasma membrane binding and cell lysis by perforin are mediated through its C2 domain: A critical role for aspartate residues 429, 435, 483, and 485 but not 491. J Biol Chem 280, 8426–8434 (2005).
den Haan, J. M., Lehar, S. M. & Bevan, M. J. CD8(+) but not CD8(−) dendritic cells cross-prime cytotoxic T cells in vivo. J Exp Med 192, 1685–1696 (2000).
Hovav, A. H. et al. Duration of antigen expression in vivo following DNA immunization modifies the magnitude, contraction, and secondary responses of CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol 179, 6725–6733 (2007).
Quah, B. J. & Parish, C. R. The use of carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to monitor lymphocyte proliferation. J Vis Exp (2010).
Romani, N. et al. Targeting skin dendritic cells to improve intradermal vaccination. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 351, 113–138 (2012).
Akbari, O. et al. DNA vaccination: transfection and activation of dendritic cells as key events for immunity. J Exp Med 189, 169–178 (1999).
Porgador, A. et al. Predominant role for directly transfected dendritic cells in antigen presentation to CD8+ T cells after gene gun immunization. J Exp Med 188, 1075–1082 (1998).
Elnekave, M. et al. Directly transfected langerin+ dermal dendritic cells potentiate CD8+ T cell responses following intradermal plasmid DNA immunization. J Immunol 185, 3463–3471 (2010).
Corr, M., von Damm, A., Lee, D. J. & Tighe, H. In vivo priming by DNA injection occurs predominantly by antigen transfer. J Immunol 163, 4721–4727 (1999).
Cho, J. H., Youn, J. W. & Sung, Y. C. Cross-priming as a predominant mechanism for inducing CD8(+) T cell responses in gene gun DNA immunization. J Immunol 167, 5549–5557 (2001).
Zanetti, M., Castiglioni, P., Rizzi, M., Wheeler, M. & Gerloni, M. B lymphocytes as antigen-presenting cell-based genetic vaccines. Immunol Rev 199, 264–278 (2004).
Colluru, V. T. & McNeel, D. G. B lymphocytes as direct antigen-presenting cells for anti-tumor DNA vaccines. Oncotarget 7, 67901–67918 (2016).
Bursch, L. S., Rich, B. E. & Hogquist, K. A. Langerhans cells are not required for the CD8 T cell response to epidermal self-antigens. J Immunol 182, 4657–4664 (2009).
Kaplan, D. H. In vivo function of Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells. Trends Immunol 31, 446–451 (2010).
Hildner, K. et al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 322, 1097–1100 (2008).
Bedoui, S. et al. Cross-presentation of viral and self antigens by skin-derived CD103+ dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 10, 488–495 (2009).
Kim, T. J. et al. Clearance of persistent HPV infection and cervical lesion by therapeutic DNA vaccine in CIN3 patients. Nat Commun 5, 5317 (2014).
Larocca, R. A. et al. Vaccine protection against Zika virus from Brazil. Nature 536, 474–478 (2016).
Abbink, P. et al. Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys. Science 353, 1129–1132 (2016).
Meurens, F., Summerfield, A., Nauwynck, H., Saif, L. & Gerdts, V. The pig: a model for human infectious diseases. Trends Microbiol 20, 50–57 (2012).
Birnboim, H. C. A rapid alkaline extraction method for the isolation of plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol 100, 243–255 (1983).
Holmes, K., Lantz, L. M., Fowlkes, B. J., Schmid, I. & Giorgi, J. V. Preparation of cells and reagents for flow cytometry. Curr Protoc Immunol Chapter 5, Unit 5 3 (2001).
Acknowledgements
Grants APP1026293, 543139 and 543143 from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia, grant BF040005 from the Australian-Indian biotechnology fund and a grant from the Hospital Research Foundation (THRF) supported the research in this study. THRF supports an early career fellowship for Danushka Wijesundara.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W.Y., B.Q., P.E., J.H., K.D. and I.V. helped execute the experiments conducted in the manuscript. E.G. and B.G. contributed with ideas necessary to develop the manuscript hypothesis and helped with the write-up of the manuscript. D.W. executed the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wijesundara, D.K., Yu, W., Quah, B.J.C. et al. Cytolytic DNA vaccine encoding lytic perforin augments the maturation of- and antigen presentation by- dendritic cells in a time-dependent manner. Sci Rep 7, 8530 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08063-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08063-1
- Springer Nature Limited