Abstract
Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) mediates the innate immune response to bacterial lipopeptides and peptidoglycans by stimulating the production of inflammatory cytokines. However, the mechanisms by which TLR2 signaling regulates type I interferon (IFN)-β production are poorly understood. Here, we identified Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) as a negative regulator of TLR2-induced IFN-β production. Pharmacological inhibition or reduced expression of SHP2 potentiated TLR2 agonist-mediated IFN-β transcription and STAT1 activation, whereas overexpression of SHP2 impaired IFN-β transcription and STAT1 activation. SHP2 physically associated with the glycogen synthase kinase 3β (Gsk3β) in an agonist-dependent manner. Gsk3β positively regulates transcription of IFN-β following TLR2 stimulation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of SHP2. SHP2 inhibited the transcriptional activity of IRF-1 and IRF-8 at the IFN-β promoter. Remarkably, IRF-1 and IRF-8 are recruited to the IFN-β promoter in a SHP2 phosphatase activity-dependent manner. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms by which SHP2 and Gsk3β work together to modulate TLR2-mediated IFN-β production in macrophages.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Toll-like receptors (TLR) play a critical role in the early innate immune response to pathogens by recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and are involved in sensing endogenous danger signals1, 2. TLR2, which is expressed on monocytes, mature macrophages and dendritic cells, and mast cells, specifically recognizes components of Gram-positive bacteria, including bacterial lipoproteins, lipomannans and lipoteichoic acids3. TLR2 can form a heterodimer with either TLR1 to recognize triacylated lipopeptides, such as the synthetic ligand Pam3CSK4, or TLR6 to recognize diacylated lipopeptides like MALP-21, 3,4,5. The dimerization of these TLRs allows for recognition of a more specific and wider array of microbial components6.
Upon stimulation with TLR2 ligands, MyD88 recruits IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 (IRAK-4) to TLR2 through interaction of the death domains of both molecules. IRAK-1 is activated by phosphorylation and associates with TRAF6, thereby activating the IKK complex and leading to activation of MAP kinases and NF-κB3, 7,8,9. These signaling pathways are critical for TLR2-mediated pro- and/or anti-inflammatory cytokine production. Tollip and IRAK-M interact with IRAK-1 and negatively regulate TLR-mediated signaling pathways10, 11. Recent data indicate that localization of TLR2 ligands within endosomal compartments regulates TLR2-mediated induction of type I interferons (IFNs)12,13,14,15, suggesting a possible role of endocytic pathways in TLR2 signaling. However, the regulatory factor and/or signaling pathways that lead to TLR2-mediated type I IFN induction are unclear.
Src homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) is an evolutionarily conserved protein tyrosine phosphatase with a widespread expression pattern16. It contains two N-terminal SH domains, a classic protein-tyrosine phosphatase domain at the C-terminal end and two important tyrosine resides (Tyr542 and Tyr580) in the C-terminal tail16, 17. SHP2 positively regulates cytokine and growth factor signaling, but negatively regulates the activation of T and B lymphocytes and IFN-γ signaling18,19,20,21. These regulatory roles of SHP2 have been proposed to occur in either a phosphatase activity-dependent or -independent manner; e.g., SHP2 inhibits TLR3- and TLR4-activated IFN-β production in a phosphatase activity-independent manner by binding to TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1)21. SHP2 activity is regulated by several molecules, ZAP70 and PKA, in multiple signaling pathways22,23,24,25.
In the present study, we demonstrate that SHP2 and Gsk3β reciprocally regulate TLR2-mediated IFN-β production, thereby identifying SHP2 and Gsk3β as a negative and a positive regulator, respectively, of the TLR2 signaling pathway.
Results
SHP2 is a negative regulator of IFN-β induction by TLR2 ligand
SHP2 negatively regulates TRIF-dependent pro-inflammatory cytokines and type I IFN induction in TLR3 and TLR4 signaling21. Although SHP2 did not affect TLR2-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine production, no previous report investigated whether SHP2 regulates TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction. TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4 could trigger IFN-β expression at both mRNA and protein levels in macrophages (Supplementary Fig. S1). We next examined the effects of the SHP2 inhibitor NSC87877 on IFN-β expression induced by the Pam3CSK4 in macrophages. Pharmacological inhibition of SHP2 potentiated Pam3CSK4-induced IFN-β mRNA expression (Fig. 1a). SHP2 undergoes rapid phosphorylation of the tyrosine residue Y542 upon Pam3CSK4 stimulation (Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting that a TLR2 signaling pathway involving SHP2 regulates IFN-β expression. In the canonical type I IFN-induced signaling pathway, IFN-β activates Janus kinase 1 and tyrosine kinase 2, which phosphorylate the cytoplasmic transcription factors signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and STAT226, 27. Phosphorylation of STAT1 upon Pam3CSK4 treatment reached a maximum at 3 h and declined thereafter (Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, we examined the effect of SHP2 inhibition on the phosphorylation of STAT1 and observed that NSC87877 augmented Pam3CSK4-induced STAT1 phosphorylation (Fig. 1b). Pretreatment with a protein transport inhibitor, Brefeldin A, completely abolished STAT1 phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. S3). Moreover, macrophages from mice deficient in the IFN α/β receptor (IFNAR −/−) failed to phosphorylate STAT1 (Supplementary Fig. S3). These data suggest that IFN-β signaling induced by Pam3CSK4 directly mediates STAT1 phosphorylation.
Similar results were obtained when we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to suppress endogenous SHP2 expression in macrophages. Silencing of SHP2 markedly increased Pam3CSK4-induced IFN-β mRNA expression and STAT1 phosphorylation (Fig. 1c,d). In contrast, IFN-β induction as well as STAT1 phosphorylation upon Pam3CSK4 stimulation was significantly decreased when a constitutively active mutant of SHP2 (SHP2 E76K) was overexpressed in macrophages (Fig. 1e,f). These results indicate that SHP2 negatively regulates TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction and the secondary response to IFN-β, i.e. STAT1 activation, in a phosphatase activity-dependent manner.
Gsk3β positively regulates TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction
IFN-β production by TLR4-stimulated macrophages is negatively regulated by a serine/threonine kinase, Gsk3β28. Thus, it would be interesting to investigate whether the Gsk3β signaling axis is critically involved in TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction. Unlike TLR4 signaling where IFN-β production is negatively regulated by Gsk3β, Gsk3-inactivated macrophages treated with the Gsk3 inhibitor SB216763 showed a marked decrease in IFN-β mRNA levels as compared with cells stimulated with Pam3CSK4 alone (Fig. 2a). To confirm the regulatory role of Gsk3β in TLR2-mediated IFN-β expression, the effect of Gsk3 inhibition on Pam3CSK4-induced STAT1 phosphorylation was observed. As shown in Fig. 2b, Gsk3 inhibition resulted in a significant decrease in STAT1 phosphorylation in Pam3CSK4-stimulated macrophages (Fig. 2b). Further, similar results were observed in macrophages silenced by a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) specific for Gsk3β, shGsk3β (Fig. 2c,d). Conversely, overexpression of the constitutively active Gsk3β mutant (Gsk3β S9A) in macrophages markedly elevated IFN-β mRNA expression and STAT1 phosphorylation after Pam3CSK4 treatment (Fig. 2e,f). Together, these data indicate that Gsk3β positively regulates TLR2-induced IFN-β induction.
Gsk3β interacts with SHP2 and counteracts the inhibitory effect of SHP2
To understand the differential regulatory mechanisms controlled by SHP2 and Gsk3β in Pam3CSK4-mediated IFN-β induction, we initially investigated the interaction between SHP2 and Gsk3β. When HEK293T cells were co-transfected with SHP2 and HA-Gsk3β constructs, SHP2 co-immunoprecipitated with HA-Gsk3β, indicating that SHP2 interacted with Gsk3β in mammalian cells (Fig. 3a). We next investigated whether SHP2 endogenously interacts with Gsk3β. We observed that SHP2 endogenously interacted with Gsk3β in macrophages in response to Pam3CSK4 at the 3 h time point (Fig. 3b). The same results were obtained in HEK293-TLR2 cells when cells overexpressing SHP2 wild-type and HA-Gsk3β were immunoprecipitated with HA-Gsk3β after TLR2 stimulation (Fig. 3c).
Considering what we knew of the interaction between SHP2 and Gsk3β, we next questioned whether SHP2 and Gsk3β reciprocally regulate each other’s activity during TLR2 signaling. Gsk3 inhibition with SB216763 resulted in significantly increased phosphorylation of SHP2 after Pam3CSK4 stimulation, although p65 phosphorylation was not altered (Fig. 3d). Similarly, Gsk3β knockdown with shRNA in macrophages significantly increased Pam3CSK4-induced SHP2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3e). In contrast, Gsk3β S9A-overexpressing macrophages showed a marked inhibition of SHP2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3f). It is interesting to note that neither overexpression of SHP2 E76K, a constitutively active mutant of SHP2, nor SHP2 inhibition with SHP2-specific siRNA altered Pam3CSK4-mediated Gsk3β phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. S4). These results suggest that Gsk3β may act upstream of SHP2 to prevent the inhibitory function of SHP2 in TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction.
IRF1 and IRF8 are involved in TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction
The transcription factors responsible for type I IFN induction are members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family29. IRF1 is known as a transcription factor involved in TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction13. Because it has been reported that IRF8 is a substrate of SHP2 and SHP2 negatively regulates TLR3 signaling30,31,32, we questioned whether IRF8 together with IRF1 is involved in TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction. We first examined the expression patterns of IRF1 and IRF8 following treatment of macrophages with Pam3CSK4. As shown in Fig. 4a, IRF1 was rapidly induced by Pam3CSK4 stimulation up to the 1 h time point and declined thereafter, but IRF8 expression remained constant over time. We next determined whether IRF1 and IRF8 are required for TLR2-induced IFN-β expression using IRF1- and IRF8-specific siRNAs to silence those genes. Silencing of IRF1 or IRF8 markedly inhibited endogenous expression of the IFNB1 gene in macrophages (Fig. 4b). IFNB1 gene expression was significantly reduced when both IRF1 and IRF8 were simultaneously silenced by siRNAs. Moreover, co-expression of IRF1 and IRF8 in HEK293-TLR2 cells significantly increased IFN-β promoter activity compared to IRF1 or IRF8 alone (Fig. 4c).
Because a signaling pathway involving SHP2 and Gsk3β was important for TLR2-mediated type I IFN induction, we next examined the effect of SHP2 and Gsk3β on IRF1- and IRF8-induced IFN-β promoter activity. Pharmacological inhibition of SHP2 significantly enhanced activation of the IFN-β promoter induced by IRF1 and IRF8 (Fig. 4d), whereas treatment with a Gsk3 inhibitor markedly inhibited IRF1/IRF8-mediated activation of the IFN-β promoter (Fig. 4e).
It has shown previously that TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM)14, 33, 34, a sorting adaptor not only for TLR2, but also for TLR4, is required for the production of TLR2-dependent type I IFN response at the endosome. Our results agree with those findings in that TRAM adaptor but not TRIF35 is required for Pam3CSK4-mediated IFN-β induction via an endosome-dependent pathway (Figs 4f and S5).
SHP2 inhibits the recruitment of IRF1 and IRF8 to the IFNB1 promoter
Recently, Tailor et al. reported that IRF8 binds directly to the IFNB1 locus35; our data also showed that IRF1 and IRF8 regulate TLR2-mediated IFN-β induction at the transcriptional level. Therefore, we examined recruitment of IRF1 and IRF8 to the IFNB1 promoter using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays after stimulation of TLR2 in macrophages. Chromatin from macrophages treated with Pam3CSK4 for various time intervals or from untreated controls was used for immunoprecipitation with an anti-IRF1 or anti-IRF8 antibody, and precipitated DNA encompassing the IFNB1 gene promoter was then assayed by real-time PCR (Fig. 5a,b). The results showed that recruitment of IRF1 and IRF8 increased within 1 h of Pam3CSK4 stimulation. Binding of IRF8 drastically decreased with somewhat faster kinetics than that of IRF1 but was sustained thereafter.
Next, to determine whether binding of IRF1 and IRF8 is regulated by SHP2, the SHP2 E76K mutant was overexpressed in macrophages. The results showed that SHP2 E76K inhibited recruitment of IRF1 and IRF8 to the IFNB1 promoter (Fig. 5c). In contrast, knockdown of SHP2 with siRNA remarkably enhanced the binding of IRF1 and IRF8 to the IFNB1 promoter (Fig. 5d). These data demonstrated that SHP2 negatively regulates TLR2-dependent induction of IFN-β by affecting the binding of IRF1 and IRF8 to the IFNB1 promoter.
Discussion
Type I IFNs are pleiotropic cytokines well recognized for their role in the induction of a potent antiviral response that is an essential part of the host defense system36,37,38. Although early investigations focused on the antiviral properties of type I IFNs, recent findings indicated that type I IFN signaling also plays a key role in the defense against bacterial infection39,40,41. In this regard, we found that SHP2 negatively regulates bacterial lipoprotein mimic Pam3CSK4-mediated IFN-β induction in macrophages. We used SHP2 siRNA to suppress endogenous SHP2 expression in primary mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages. Pam3CSK4-induced IFN-β expression was increased, and this effect correlated with the suppression of endogenous SHP2 expression. The negative role of SHP2 in Pam3CSK4-induced type I IFN signaling was confirmed by both pharmacological inhibition and overexpression of SHP2.
Previous studies revealed that Gsk3β differentially regulates TLR-mediated induction of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-12p40 and IL-10, by affecting the nuclear amount of p65 and CREB interacting with CBP42, 43. In addition, Gsk3β is critical for virus-triggered IRF3 activation and IFN-β production, and its functions in those regards are independent of its kinase activity44, 45. Instead, Gsk3β mediates oligomerization and auto-phosphorylation of TBK1, a kinase responsible for IRF3 phosphorylation after viral infection. In this study, we found that Gsk3β, unlike SHP2, promoted Pam3CSK4-induced type I IFN expression by binding to and controlling SHP2 in the TRAM-dependent endocytic pathway involving TLR2 signaling.
Overexpression of Gsk3β markedly inhibited Pam3CSK4-mediated SHP2 phosphorylation. Conversely, shRNA-mediated knockdown of Gsk3β increased SHP2 phosphorylation. Consistently, pharmacological inhibition of Gsk3 produced impaired SHP2 phosphorylation after Pam3CSK4 stimulation, suggesting that the kinase activity of Gsk3β is required for inhibition of SHP2 in TLR2 signaling. Although this finding is interesting, whether and how the serine/threonine kinase Gsk3β controls tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2 remains to be investigated. One potential hypothesis is that SHP2 might be a substrate of Gsk3β, thereby facilitating inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2.
Our findings suggest that SHP2 is able to regulate IFN-β transcription through inhibition of the DNA binding activity of IRF1 and IRF8. Previous work has revealed that SHP2 is mainly found in the cytoplasm but is also present in the nucleus, where it regulates target gene activation17, 46,47,48. Moreover, Gsk3β shuttles between the cytoplasm and nucleus49,50,51,52. Indeed, SHP2 associated with Gsk3β together with IRF-1 and IRF-8 in mammalian cells (Supplementary Fig. S6). Moreover, IRF1 and IRF8 mainly localized to the nucleus (Supplementary Fig. S7). We found that SHP2 translocated into the nucleus upon Pam3CSK4 stimulation, suggesting that these interactions may occur in the nucleus. Previously, it was shown that TLR2 activation induces type I IFN-β expression through IRF7-dependent pathway13. However, unlike IRF-1 and IRF-8, IRF-7 could not associate with SHP2 or Gsk3β (Supplementary Fig. S8), suggesting that TLR2 may use different IRFs depending on binding partners or cellular contexts.
It has shown previously that TRAM is required for the production of TLR2-dependent type I IFN response14, 33, 34. However, TRIF adaptor is not involved in this pathway, and our results agree with those findings because Pam3CSK4-mediated IFN-β induction was impaired by knockdown of TRAM but not TRIF. In contrast, Nilsen et al.33, 35 reported that TLR2 ligands can induce IFN-β in a TRAM/TRIF-dependent manner. The reason for this discrepancy still remains unclear, but presumably relates to varied experimental settings or conditions.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that SHP2 and Gsk3β reciprocally regulate type I IFN-β expression in response to TLR2 stimulation. In the context of bacterial infection, it is difficult to provide a simple conclusion regarding the function of type I IFN-β. It appears, instead, that in response to bacteria, type I IFN-β may serve a variety of beneficial and detrimental immune-related functions, many of which remain to be fully understood.
Methods
Mice and cell culture
Normal 5- to 8-wk-old C57BL/6 male mice were obtained from the Animal Care Committee of Ewha Laboratory Animal Genomics Center. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Ewha Laboratory Animal Genomics Center, and were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were obtained from femurs and tibias of C57BL/6 mice. Bone marrow cells were flushed out from the bone marrow cavity and suspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone), 100 units/ml penicillin (Hyclone) and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Hyclone). After 1 day in culture, non-adherent cells were cultured in the presence of 10 ng/ml recombinant human M-CSF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 7 days, as described previously45. HEK293-Null and TLR2 cells were provided by Dr. S.K. Seo (Inje University, Busan, Korea). Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. HEK293-Null and TLR2 cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland, U.K.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Reagents and antibodies
The TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4 was purchased from Invivogen (San Diego, CA, USA). SB216763, Brefeldin A, and Bafilomycin A1 were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). NSC87877 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies specific to phosphor-SHP2 (Y542), phosphor-p65 (Y536), phosphor-STAT1 (Y701), Gsk3β, p65, IRF1, IRF8, and HA were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Antibodies specific to SHP2, IRF8/ICSBP (anti-goat), GAPDH, and β-actin were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The antibody against Gsk3α/β was purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Paisley, Scotland, U.K.).
Plasmids
Wild-type and C463S SHP2 plasmids were obtained from Dr. X. Cao (Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China). SHP2 E76K was made by performing site-directed mutagenesis. To generate the IRF1 plasmid, an IRF1 DNA fragment was obtained from cDNA isolated from mouse BMDMs by PCR and cloned into the pcDNA3.1-HA expression vector. The IRF8 plasmid was provided by Dr. H. Xiong (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA). The IRF8 DNA fragment produced by PCR was cloned into the pEBG expression vector. Plasmids containing various mutants of Gsk3β were described previously44. The IFN-β luciferase reporter construct was a gift from Dr. X. Lei (Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen). First strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was transcribed using the SuperScript Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) from mRNA. Real-time PCR was performed using the KAPA SYBR green FAST qPCR kit (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA) on an ABI 7300 real-time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Data were normalized to β-actin mRNA expression. The gene-specific primers used for real-time PCR were as follows: β-actin, sense; 5′-AGATGTGGATCAAGCAG-3′ and antisense; 5′-GCGCAAGTTAGGTTTTGTCA-3′, IFN-β, sense; 5′-CATCAACTATAAGCAGCTCCA-3′ and antisense; 5′-TTCAAGTGGAGAGCAGTTGAG-3′. Data were normalized to β-actin mRNA expression.
Retroviral infection
To prepare retroviruses, the Platinum-E (Plat-E) packaging cell line was transfected with various pMX-puro construct DNAs with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The retroviruses were used to infect BMDMs as previously described53. The pMX-puro vector and Plat-E cells were provided by T. Kitamura (University of Tokyo). After retroviral infection, the BMDMs were cultured in the presence of M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and puromycine (2 μg/ml) for 2 days. Puromycine-resistant BMDMs were starved with DMEM supplemented with 0.1% FBS (Hyclone) for 3 h, stimulated with Pam3CSK4 for the indicated times, and used for further analysis.
Immunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed on ice in lysis buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM PMSF and 1 μg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin) and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM NaVO4 and 1 mM NaF). For immunoprecipitation, cell lysates were incubated with the indicated primary antibodies at 4 °C for O/N, and were further incubated with protein A- or G-agarose (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) at 4 °C for 1 h with rotation. After washing five times with lysis buffer, immunoprecipitated proteins were boiled with 2 × SDS loading buffer, and separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
Western blot analysis
Cell were lysed in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, proteinase inhibitors (1 mM PMSF and 1 μg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin) and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM NaVO4 and 1 mM NaF) after vortexing 5 times for 30 min on ice. After 20 min centrifugation, the supernatants were boiled in 6X SDS sample buffer containing 0.6 M DTT. Cell lysates or immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and electrotransferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 and were immunoblotted with the indicated primary antibodies and secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP. Proteins were detected using an ECL detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, NJ, USA).
siRNA preparation and transfection
siRNA against mouse negative control, SHP2, IRF1, and IRF8 was synthesized by Genolution (Seoul, Korea). The siRNAs were transfected into BMDMs using the Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences of the siRNAs were as follows: si-SHP2, CACTGGGGACTACTATGACTT; si-IRF1, GAAGATAGCCGAAGACCTTTT; si-IRF8, ACTCATTCTGGTGCAGGTATT; scrambled nontargeting siRNA, CCTCGTGCCGTTCCATCAGGTAGTT, as a negative control.
Luciferase assay
HEK293-Null and TLR2 cells were transfected with the IFN-β luciferase reporter constructs and the indicated combinations of gene constructs with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h, the cells were stimulated with Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/ml) and lysed in reporter lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, MI, USA). Luciferase activity was measured with a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The firefly luciferase activity of samples was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.
ChIP assay
This assay was performed with the protocol recommended by Millipore. In brief, BMDMs were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were lysed in 200 μl of lysis buffer and sonicated on ice with a Branson Digital Sonifier to shear DNA into pieces with an average size of 500 bp. After centrifugation, supernatants were pre-cleared with a 50% salmon sperm DNA/protein A agarose slurry for 1 h. Chromatin was incubated with 2 μg of normal IgG or anti-IRF1 and IRF8 antibodies O/N with rotation. This was followed by incubation with salmon sperm DNA/protein A agarose slurry for 1 h, then samples were sequentially washed with low salt buffer, high salt buffer, LiCl buffer, and twice with TE buffer. After elution, complexes were reverse cross-linked with NaCl for 4 h at 65 °C and digested with proteinase K, EDTA and Tris-HCl for 1 h at 45 °C. Purified DNA was subjected to quantitative real-time PCR with primers. Input DNA (1%) was used for normalization.
Statistics
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test to analyze differences among groups. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.
References
O’Neill, L. A., Golenbock, D. & Bowie, A. G. The history of Toll-like receptors - redefining innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 453–460, doi:10.1038/nri3446 (2013).
Medzhitov, R. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 449, 819–826, doi:10.1038/nature06246 (2007).
Kawai, T. & Akira, S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 11, 373–384, doi:10.1038/ni.1863 (2010).
Takeuchi, O. et al. TLR6: A novel member of an expanding toll-like receptor family. Gene 231, 59–65 (1999).
Jin, M. S. et al. Crystal structure of the TLR1-TLR2 heterodimer induced by binding of a tri-acylated lipopeptide. Cell 130, 1071–1082, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.008 (2007).
Underhill, D. M. et al. The Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited to macrophage phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens. Nature 401, 811–815, doi:10.1038/44605 (1999).
Li, S., Strelow, A., Fontana, E. J. & Wesche, H. IRAK-4: a novel member of the IRAK family with the properties of an IRAK-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 5567–5572, doi:10.1073/pnas.082100399 (2002).
Takeda, K. & Akira, S. Toll receptors and pathogen resistance. Cell Microbiol 5, 143–153 (2003).
Miggin, S. M. & O’Neill, L. A. New insights into the regulation of TLR signaling. J Leukoc Biol 80, 220–226, doi:10.1189/jlb.1105672 (2006).
Kobayashi, K. et al. IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 110, 191–202 (2002).
Didierlaurent, A. et al. Tollip regulates proinflammatory responses to interleukin-1 and lipopolysaccharide. Mol Cell Biol 26, 735–742, doi:10.1128/MCB.26.3.735-742.2006 (2006).
Ip, W. K. et al. Phagocytosis and phagosome acidification are required for pathogen processing and MyD88-dependent responses to Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of immunology 184, 7071–7081, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1000110 (2010).
Dietrich, N., Lienenklaus, S., Weiss, S. & Gekara, N. O. Murine toll-like receptor 2 activation induces type I interferon responses from endolysosomal compartments. PloS one 5, e10250, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010250 (2010).
Stack, J. et al. TRAM is required for TLR2 endosomal signaling to type I IFN induction. J Immunol 193, 6090–6102, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1401605 (2014).
Han, S. J. et al. Internalization and TLR-dependent type I interferon production by monocytes in response to Toxoplasma gondii. Immunol Cell Biol 92, 872–881, doi:10.1038/icb.2014.70 (2014).
Xu, D. & Qu, C. K. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the JAK/STAT pathway. Frontiers in bioscience: a journal and virtual library 13, 4925–4932 (2008).
Neel, B. G., Gu, H. & Pao, L. The ‘Shp’ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 28, 284–293, doi:10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4 (2003).
Lee, K. M. et al. Molecular basis of T cell inactivation by CTLA-4. Science 282, 2263–2266 (1998).
Sedy, J. R. et al. B and T lymphocyte attenuator regulates T cell activation through interaction with herpesvirus entry mediator. Nature immunology 6, 90–98, doi:10.1038/ni1144 (2005).
You, M., Yu, D. H. & Feng, G. S. Shp-2 tyrosine phosphatase functions as a negative regulator of the interferon-stimulated Jak/STAT pathway. Molecular and cellular biology 19, 2416–2424 (1999).
An, H. et al. SHP-2 phosphatase negatively regulates the TRIF adaptor protein-dependent type I interferon and proinflammatory cytokine production. Immunity 25, 919–928, doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.014 (2006).
Cha, Y. & Park, K. S. SHP2 is a downstream target of ZAP70 to regulate JAK1/STAT3 and ERK signaling pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells. FEBS letters 584, 4241–4246, doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2010.09.016 (2010).
Burmeister, B. T. et al. Protein Kinase A (PKA) Phosphorylation of Shp2 Protein Inhibits Its Phosphatase Activity and Modulates Ligand Specificity. The Journal of biological chemistry 290, 12058–12067, doi:10.1074/jbc.M115.642983 (2015).
Tsai, C. C. et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta facilitates IFN-gamma-induced STAT1 activation by regulating Src homology-2 domain-containing phosphatase 2. Journal of immunology 183, 856–864, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0804033 (2009).
Tseng, P. C. et al. Regulation of SHP2 by PTEN/AKT/GSK-3beta signaling facilitates IFN-gamma resistance in hyperproliferating gastric cancer. Immunobiology 217, 926–934, doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2012.01.001 (2012).
Darnell, J. E. Jr., Kerr, I. M. & Stark, G. R. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science 264, 1415–1421 (1994).
Ihle, J. N. & Kerr, I. M. Jaks and Stats in signaling by the cytokine receptor superfamily. Trends Genet 11, 69–74 (1995).
Wang, H. et al. IFN-beta production by TLR4-stimulated innate immune cells is negatively regulated by GSK3-beta. J Immunol 181, 6797–6802 (2008).
Taniguchi, T., Ogasawara, K., Takaoka, A. & Tanaka, N. IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annual review of immunology 19, 623–655, doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.623 (2001).
Huang, W. et al. Leukemia-associated, constitutively active mutants of SHP2 protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibit NF1 transcriptional activation by the interferon consensus sequence binding protein. Mol Cell Biol 26, 6311–6332, doi:10.1128/MCB.00036-06 (2006).
Zhu, C., Lindsey, S., Konieczna, I. & Eklund, E. A. Constitutive activation of SHP2 protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibits ICSBP-induced transcription of the gene encoding gp91PHOX during myeloid differentiation. Journal of leukocyte biology 83, 680–691, doi:10.1189/jlb.0807514 (2008).
Fragale, A. et al. Critical role of IRF-8 in negative regulation of TLR3 expression by Src homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2 activity in human myeloid dendritic cells. J Immunol 186, 1951–1962, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1000918 (2011).
Nilsen, N. J. et al. A role for the adaptor proteins TRAM and TRIF in toll-like receptor 2 signaling. J Biol Chem 290, 3209–3222, doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.593426 (2015).
Kagan, J. C. et al. TRAM couples endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4 to the induction of interferon-beta. Nat Immunol 9, 361–368, doi:10.1038/ni1569 (2008).
Oshiumi, H., Matsumoto, M., Funami, K., Akazawa, T. & Seya, T. TICAM-1, an adaptor molecule that participates in Toll-like receptor 3-mediated interferon-beta induction. Nat Immunol 4, 161–167, doi:10.1038/ni886 (2003).
Tailor, P. et al. The feedback phase of type I interferon induction in dendritic cells requires interferon regulatory factor 8. Immunity 27, 228–239, doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.06.009 (2007).
Zhou, A., Hassel, B. A. & Silverman, R. H. Expression cloning of 2-5A-dependent RNAase: a uniquely regulated mediator of interferon action. Cell 72, 753–765 (1993).
Noppert, S. J., Fitzgerald, K. A. & Hertzog, P. J. The role of type I interferons in TLR responses. Immunol Cell Biol 85, 446–457, doi:10.1038/sj.icb.7100099 (2007).
Lu, J., O’Hara, E. B., Trieselmann, B. A., Romano, P. R. & Dever, T. E. The interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase PKR will phosphorylate serine, threonine, or tyrosine at residue 51 in eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha. J Biol Chem 274, 32198–32203 (1999).
Auerbuch, V., Brockstedt, D. G., Meyer-Morse, N., O’Riordan, M. & Portnoy, D. A. Mice lacking the type I interferon receptor are resistant to Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med 200, 527–533, doi:10.1084/jem.20040976 (2004).
Boxx, G. M. & Cheng, G. The Roles of Type I Interferon in Bacterial Infection. Cell Host Microbe 19, 760–769, doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.016 (2016).
Monroe, K. M., McWhirter, S. M. & Vance, R. E. Induction of type I interferons by bacteria. Cell Microbiol 12, 881–890, doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01478.x (2010).
Martin, M., Rehani, K., Jope, R. S. & Michalek, S. M. Toll-like receptor-mediated cytokine production is differentially regulated by glycogen synthase kinase 3. Nat Immunol 6, 777–784, doi:10.1038/ni1221 (2005).
Lei, C. Q. et al. Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta regulates IRF3 transcription factor-mediated antiviral response via activation of the kinase TBK1. Immunity 33, 878–889, doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.021 (2010).
Ko, R., Park, J. H., Ha, H., Choi, Y. & Lee, S. Y. Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta ubiquitination by TRAF6 regulates TLR3-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Nat Commun 6, 6765, doi:10.1038/ncomms7765 (2015).
Araki, T., Nawa, H. & Neel, B. G. Tyrosyl phosphorylation of Shp2 is required for normal ERK activation in response to some, but not all, growth factors. J Biol Chem 278, 41677–41684, doi:10.1074/jbc.M306461200 (2003).
Wu, T. R. et al. SHP-2 is a dual-specificity phosphatase involved in Stat1 dephosphorylation at both tyrosine and serine residues in nuclei. J Biol Chem 277, 47572–47580, doi:10.1074/jbc.M207536200 (2002).
Tsutsumi, R. et al. YAP and TAZ, Hippo signaling targets, act as a rheostat for nuclear SHP2 function. Dev Cell 26, 658–665, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.08.013 (2013).
Grimes, C. A. & Jope, R. S. The multifaceted roles of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta in cellular signaling. Prog Neurobiol 65, 391–426 (2001).
Bijur, G. N. & Jope, R. S. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta is highly activated in nuclei and mitochondria. Neuroreport 14, 2415–2419, doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000099609.19426.70 (2003).
Franca-Koh, J., Yeo, M., Fraser, E., Young, N. & Dale, T. C. The regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 nuclear export by Frat/GBP. J Biol Chem 277, 43844–43848, doi:10.1074/jbc.M207265200 (2002).
Meares, G. P. & Jope, R. S. Resolution of the nuclear localization mechanism of glycogen synthase kinase-3: functional effects in apoptosis. J Biol Chem 282, 16989–17001, doi:10.1074/jbc.M700610200 (2007).
Jang, H. D. et al. Inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta is required for osteoclast differentiation. J Biol Chem 286, 39043–39050, doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.256768 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. 2016R1A2B3010699; No. 2012R1A5A1048236; No. 2012M3A9C5048708) and the National Research Council of Science and Technology through the Degree & Research Center program (DRC-2014-1-KBSI).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design: J.H.P. and S.Y.L.; Study conduct: J.H.P. and R.K.; Data analysis and interpretation: J.H.P., R.K. and S.Y.L.; Drafting manuscript: J.H.P. and S.Y.L.; All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J.H., Ko, R. & Lee, S.Y. Reciprocal regulation of TLR2-mediated IFN-β production by SHP2 and Gsk3β. Sci Rep 7, 6807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07316-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07316-3
- Springer Nature Limited